Open Access

Phylogeny and androgenesis in the invasive Corbicula clams (Bivalvia, Corbiculidae) in Western Europe

  • Lise-Marie Pigneur1Email author,
  • Jonathan Marescaux1,
  • Kathleen Roland1,
  • Emilie Etoundi1,
  • Jean-Pierre Descy1 and
  • Karine Van Doninck1
BMC Evolutionary Biology201111:147

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-147

Received: 24 November 2010

Accepted: 27 May 2011

Published: 27 May 2011

Abstract

Background

The genus Corbicula is one of the most invasive groups of molluscs. It includes both sexual and androgenetic lineages. The present study re-assessed the different morphotypes and haplotypes of West European Corbicula in order to clarify their taxonomic identification and phylogenetic relationships with American and Asian Corbicula clams. We studied several populations from West European river basins (Meuse, Seine, Rhine and Rhône) through an "integrative taxonomy" approach. We combined morphology, partial mitochondrial COI and cyt b sequences and eleven microsatellite loci. Furthermore, we looked for discrepancies between mtDNA and nrDNA/morphology, indicative of androgenesis between lineages.

Results

There are three Corbicula morphotypes in Western Europe associated to three mitochondrial lineages and three genotypes. Form R shares the same COI haplotype as the American form A and the Japanese C. leana. Form S and the American form C have the same haplotype, although their morphologies seem divergent. The European form Rlc belongs to the same mitochondrial lineage as both the American form B and the Asian C. fluminea.

Interestingly, within each haplotype/genotype or lineage, no genetic diversity was found although their invasive success is high. Moreover, we detected rare mismatches between mtDNA and nrDNA/morphology, indicative of androgenesis and mitochondrial capture between form R and form S and therefore challenging the phylogenetic relatedness and the species status within this genus. The global phylogenetic analysis revealed that the sexual Corbicula lineages seem restricted to the native areas while their androgenetic relatives are widespread and highly invasive.

Conclusions

We clarified the discrepancies and incongruent results found in the literature about the European morphotypes of Corbicula and associated mitochondrial lineages. The three West European morphotypes belong to three distinct nuclear and mitochondrial lineages. However mitochondrial capture occurs in sympatric populations of forms R and S. The species status of the morphotypes therefore remains doubtful. Moreover the androgenetic lineages seem widely distributed compared to their sexual relatives, suggesting that androgenesis and invasive success may be linked in the genus Corbicula.

Background

The clams of the genus Corbicula are successful fresh and brackish water invaders considered 'r'-strategists, with rapid maturation, high fecundity, and high dispersal [13]. These bivalves are benthic filter-feeders which can reduce phytoplankton density [46], compete with native species [7, 8] and damage industrial cooling systems [9]. The genus Corbicula is of particular interest both because of its diverse reproductive strategies (from free-swimming larvae to incubation of larvae in gills) [10] and because it contains sexual and asexual reproducing lineages. The genus includes sexual dioecious species as well as hermaphrodites, with at least some or all of the latter reproducing through a rare form of asexual reproduction, known as androgenesis, in which offspring are clones of their father [11, 12]. Androgenesis in Corbicula is characterized by the fertilization of an oocyte by an unreduced sperm (with a DNA content equal to the DNA content of a somatic cell). The maternal nuclear DNA is then entirely extruded as two polar bodies and only the 'male' pronucleus remains and becomes the nucleus of the zygote [1114].

Interestingly, androgenetic Corbicula lineages have biflagellate sperm while sexual ones are characterized by monoflagellate sperm [1519].

The modern native range of the genus Corbicula is Asia, the Middle East, Australia and Africa but fossils have been recorded in Europe, North America and Japan (reviewed in [20]). The first record of Corbicula outside its extant original range was in 1924 in British Columbia [21, 22]. The clams then quickly spread throughout North America and arrived in South America in the 1970s [23] and in Europe in the 1980s [24].

Although Corbicula is one of the most important invasive bivalve groups because of its ecological and economic impacts, the taxonomic status of the invaders remains unresolved, because, amongst others, the genus shows considerable phenotypic variation in shell shape and ornamentation, some of which ecophenotypic [25]. The first traditional morphology-based taxonomic studies of Asian Corbicula described approximately 200 species [2628]. However, subsequent studies based on shell characteristics [29], allozymes [25] or genetics [30] suggested the occurrence of fewer species. In addition, both dioecious sexual and hermaphroditic clonal lineages were found in Asia [17, 31] but their evolutionary relationships, taxonomic status and nomenclature are still uncertain. Park & Kim [31] studied several Asian populations of Corbicula and showed that the estuarine species form a distinct sister-clade of the freshwater species with two mitochondrial lineages being the most common in freshwater habitats in Asia. Within these two major lineages, several haplotypes are also found in the invaded areas (America and Europe), e.g. haplotype FW1 in North America and haplotype FW5 in America and Europe [31] (Table 1).
Table 1

GenBank accession numbers, COI haplotype designation and localities of Corbicula spp. sequences included in phylogenetic analysis.

Code1

Taxon

Location

Haplotype

GenBank

Sperm morphology

sandai A

C. sandai

Japan

 

AF196272

monoflagellate³

sandai B

C. sandai

Japan

 

AF196273

monoflagellate³

austr

C. australis

Australia

 

AF196274

Biflagellate4

FW1

C. fluminea

Korea

 

AF196269

biflagellate³ α

FW1

C. sp. (form B)

USA

B1-3

AF519509-11

biflagellate5

C2

C. sp. (form C) 2

Argentina

 

AF519512

 

FW2

C. sp.

China

 

AF457989

 

FW3

C. sp.

China

 

AF457990

 

FW4

C. fluminalis

Netherlands

V

AF269096-8

 

FW4

C. sp. (form Rlc)

See Table 4

3

GU721084

biflagellate6

FW4

C. subplanata

Indonesia

 

DQ285602

 

lindu

C. linduensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285579

monoflagellate7

FW5

C. fluminea

France

I

AF269090-3

 

FW5

C. sp. (form A)

USA

A1-13

AF519495-507

biflagellate5

FW5

C. sp. (form R)

See Tables 3, 4

1

GU721082

biflagellate6

FW5

C. leana

Japan

 

AF196268

biflagellate³ α

FW5

C. sp.

Germany

H2

AY097263-75

 

FW7

C. fluminea

France

II

AF269094

 

FW8

C. sp.

Taiwan

 

AF457991

 

H7

C. sp.

Germany

 

AY097284

 

FW9

C. javanica

Indonesia

 

AF457993

 

FW10

C. sp.

Korea

 

AF457992

 

FW11

C. sp.

China

 

AF457994

 

FW12

C. sp.

China

 

AF457995

 

FW13

C. sp.

China

 

AF457999

 

FW14

C. fluminea

Thailand

 

AF196270

 

FW15

C. sp.

Vietnam

 

AF468017

 

FW16

C. sp.

Vietnam

 

AF468018

 

FW17

C. sp. (form S)

See Tables 3, 4

2

GU721083

biflagellate6

FW17

C. fluminea-like

France (Rhône)

IV

AF269095

 

FW17

C. sp. (form C)

Argentina

C1

AF519508

biflagellate5

FW17

C. sp.

Germany

H4

AY097277-81

 

H1

C. sp.

Germany

 

AY097262

 

H5

C. sp.

Germany

 

AY097282

 

H8

C. sp.

Germany

 

AY097285

 

H18

C. sp.

Israel

 

AY097295-8

 

H25

C. sp.

France (Rhône)

 

AY097302

 

H26

C. sp.

France (Rhône)

 

AY097303

 

fluminalis A

C. fluminalis A

China

 

AF457996

 

fluminalis C

C. fluminalis C

China

 

AF457998

 

H32

C. sp.

Japan

 

AY097312

 

japonica A

C. japonica

Japan

 

AF196271

monoflagellate7

Kor4

C. sp.

Korea

 

EU090399

 

KR1

C. japonica

Korea

 

AF367440

monoflagellate7

lamar

C. lamarckiana

Thaïland

 

DQ285578

monoflagellate8

loeh80

C. loehensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285580

monoflagellate8

loeh81

C. loehensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285581

monoflagellate8

mata89

C. matannensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285589

monoflagellate8

mata63

C. matannensis

Indonesia

 

AY275663

monoflagellate8

mata65

C. matannensis

Indonesia

 

AY275665

monoflagellate8

mata92

C. matannensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285592

monoflagellate8

mata87

C. matannensis

Indonesia

 

DQ295587

monoflagellate8

mata94

C. matannensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285594

monoflagellate8

posso

C. possoensis

Indonesia

 

DQ285598

monoflagellate8

anomio

C. anomioides

Indonesia

 

DQ285605

 

mada

C. madagascariensis

Madagascar

 

AF196275

 

Neocorbicula limosa

N. limosa

Argentina

 

AF196277

monoflagellate8

Sperm morphology is indicated if known: biflagellate sperm is considered as indicative for androgenesis [19], 1haplotype name used in the present study, 2mitochondrial-morphotype mismatch, ³ [15], 4 [16], 5 [18], 6present study, 7 [41], 8 [17], αandrogenetic forms as evidenced by cytological studies [11, 12].

In the New World, three shell morphotypes have been distinguished for invasive Corbicula [18]. The two North American morphs show substantial morphological and genetic differences [32, 33] with form A (also referred to as the "white form") being apparently derived from populations of C. leana from Japan and form B (the "purple form") being derived from populations of C. fluminea from China and/or Korea [34, 19]. Both morphs have also been recorded in South America where a third, genetically distinct, morph also occurs (form C; [18]).

In Europe, Corbicula clams were first recorded in French and Portuguese estuaries in 1980 [24]. They have subsequently succeeded in colonising many of the major European watersheds and can reach high densities in some rivers and lakes ([3539], authors' personal observation). Ever since Corbicula was found in Europe in the 1980s, it has been debated which species invaded this continent and where they came from. A study [40] revealed two morphotypes in several European rivers. They were identified as C. fluminea and C. fluminalis. C. fluminalis sensu stricto is a hermaphroditic form from Central Asia, the Caucasus and Middle East, characterized by a high triangular shell [41]. Both morphotypes found in European rivers were genetically characterized as two distinct genetic lineages based on allozymes and mitochondrial COI sequences. However, in the River Rhône, Renard et al. [40] found none of these two haplotypes but instead found a unique, third haplotype (COI haplotype IV) with the morphology of the "C. fluminea" lineage (Table 2). Based on enzyme polymorphism and RFLP analysis of the mitochondrial COI gene, this cryptic, unnamed lineage was considered a separate species ("C. fluminea-like") [40]. Pfenninger et al. [42] also conducted a genetic study on Corbicula including European samples. Two morphotypes, the "round form" (R) and the "saddle form" (S), were found sympatrically in the River Rhine. Based on mitochondrial COI sequence data, the round form (R) from the Rhine has the haplotype H2 which is identical to haplotype I of Renard et al. [40], American form A [18, 19, 34] and Asian C. leana haplotype FW5 [31, 34]. However, form S from the Rhine, which is morphologically close to the C. fluminalis of Renard et al. [40], has exactly the same COI haplotype (haplotype H4) as the third genetic lineage (haplotype IV) from the Rhône and not the expected C. fluminalis haplotype. These COI data also indicate that the haplotype H4 of form S, and hence Renard et al.'s [40] haplotype IV, is identical to the haplotype C1 of American form C ([18, 19]). Moreover, random DNA amplification fingerprinting and ITS1 RFLP analysis revealed the presence of cryptic hybrids between the R and S lineages from the River Rhine [42]. These hybrids could display either parental morphotypes or, in a few cases, intermediate morphotypes. In Portugal, the populations of Corbicula from the Lima and Minho rivers are morphologically distinct but have the same COI haplotype, identical to haplotype FW5 (the "form A - form R lineage") [43]. The observed difference in shell shape and colour has been attributed to an adaptation to distinct ecological conditions, different origins and/or genetic alterations during distinct migration, or differential selection processes in the two rivers [43].
Table 2

Comparison of the COI results for the different Corbicula morphotypes including the previous nomenclature used.

Renard et al. 2000 [40]

Haplotype I (FW5) C. fluminea

Haplotype IV (FW17) C. fluminea-like (Rhône)

Haplotype V (FW4) C. fluminalis

Pfenninger et al. 2002 [42]

Haplotype H2 (FW5) Form R

 

Haplotype H4 (FW17) Form S

Present study

Haplotype 1 (FW5) Form R

Genotype 1

Haplotype 2 (FW17) Form R(mt/morphotype mismatch: 2 individuals)

Genotype 1

Haplotype 3 (FW4) Form Rlc (Rhône) Genotype 3

Haplotype 2 (FW17) Form S Genotype 2

Asian haplotypes (Siripattrawan et al. 2000 [34]; Park & Kim 2003 [31])

C. leana Haplotype FW5

C. fluminea (FW1) C. subplanata Haplotype FW4

(Haplotype FW17)

American haplotypes (Lee et al. 2005 [18])

Haplotypes A1-13 (FW5) Form A

Haplotype B1-3 (FW1) Form B

Haplotype C1 (FW17) Form C

Representative COI haplotypes from each lineage have been included. See Table 1 and Fig. 2 for the whole data set. Genotypes (from microsatellite data) are indicated for each of the three forms investigated in the present study. Haplotype FW17 was not found in any Asian population but this nomenclature was used for the European haplotype IV [31].

Revising the divergent results obtained by Renard et al. [40] and Pfenninger et al. [42] for the "C. fluminalis - form S" morphotype (see also Table 2), it is still unclear which European morphotype of Corbicula corresponds to which haplotype and what is their phylogenetic relationship with American and Asian Corbicula clams. In Europe and America, most individuals of Corbicula that have the same morphotype also have the same mitochondrial haplotype. However a mismatch between mtDNA and morphotype may be observed because of androgenesis between distinct genetic lineages [18, 19, 44]. More specifically, an unreduced spermatozoon from one lineage can fertilize the egg of another lineage. The maternal nuclear DNA of the latter one will be extruded as two polar bodies but the mitochondria will be retained, while only the 'male' pronucleus of the first lineage will be involved in the zygote development [11, 18, 19]. This phenomenon has also been referred to as egg parasitism. In some rare cases, the maternal nuclear genome can be partially or totally retained, leading to a peculiar form of hybridisation [18].

Furthermore, Komaru et al. [45, 46] observed in laboratory populations of C. leana and C. fluminea that incomplete extrusion of the maternal genome occurs, causing an elevation of ploidy level. Indeed, individuals of C. fluminea of several ploidy levels have been reported (2n: [47]; 3n: [48]; 4n: [48]).

The present study aimed at re-investigating the different morphotypes and haplotypes in West European lineages of Corbicula in order to finally clarify their phylogenetic relationships with American and Asian clams. We applied an "integrative taxonomy" approach by studying morphology and comparing it to molecular data [49]. More specifically, we used shell and sperm morphology, partial mitochondrial COI and cyt b sequences and, in addition, nuclear polymorphic microsatellite loci to study Corbicula spp. collected from the Western European river basins Meuse, Seine, Rhine and Rhône. In our phylogenetic dataset we included published COI haplotypes of European, African, American, Asian and Australian lineages. Moreover, we explored the presence of mismatches between mtDNA and nrDNA/morphotype (cytonuclear mismatches) in European populations, indicative of androgenesis between lineages and therefore challenging the sister-taxon relationships and the species status within the genus Corbicula. Furthermore, we emphasize the possible relationship between androgenesis and the invasive success of Corbicula clams.

Results

Morphological analysis

Two main morphotypes have been discriminated visually. They correspond to the forms described by Pfenninger et al. [42]: a round and broad form with deep ridges (round form, R) and a narrow form with closely spaced ridges (saddle form, S) (see [39] for pictures of both forms). Both forms occur syntopically in the Hollands Diep (Rhine-Meuse delta), in the River Meuse (Belgium, Table 3) and in the Rivers Seine and Rhine (Table 4). The individuals from the River Rhône can be subdivided into two colour groups of form R [36], viz. one with dark shells whose interior surface is white and purple (as in form R sampled elsewhere), the other with lighter shells whose interior is white-yellow (light form, Rlc). Form Rlc from the Rhône has also been recorded in the River Gardon (France, see [39]). Measurements were made on 429 specimens of Corbicula from all sampled localities. The measurements provided in the literature for the lectotypes of C. fluminea Müller and C. fluminalis Müller (collection of Universitetets Zoologisk Museum of Copenhagen [20]) and the type specimen of C. leana Prime (original description of the species in [26]) were also included in the analysis. The two main forms identified a priori (R and S) could be distinguished on the basis of the Principal Components Analysis (PCA) conducted on the three studied ratios (H/L, H/W and L/W, see Methods) (Figure 1). Form Rlc from the Rhône was morphometrically close to form R (Figure 1). We therefore conducted a new PCA on these two forms exclusively (results not shown). This analysis still showed an overlap between the two forms but suggested that specimens of form Rlc have a significantly lower H/L ratio (analysis of variance, p < 0.01). However, our study included only 14 specimens of form Rlc and a more extensive sampling is needed to test the differences with form R. The morphological distinction between forms R and Rlc is mainly based on colour, especially of the inner shell. Moreover, we noticed that juvenile individuals of form Rlc have an orange spot on their umbo (the dorsal shell protrusion) which is not observed for juveniles of form R (Pigneur LM & Marescaux J, personal observation).
Table 3

Sampling sites of Corbicula spp. in River Meuse.

Origin

Location (collectors)

Form

(R, Rlc, S)

N COI

Meuse

Revin

R

5

(France)

Vireux-Molhain

R

7

 

Chooz

R

2

Meuse

Heer-Agimont

R

7

(Belgium)

Hastière

R

10

 

Waulsort

R

12

 

Dinant

R

7

 

Houx

R

8

 

Godinne

R

6

 

Rivière

R

4

 

Tailfer

R

8

 

Beez (provided by divers)

R

3

 

Sclayn

R

5

 

Huy

R

6

 

Tihange (nuclear power plant)

R and S

17

 

(provided by C. Lamine - C. Martin)

  
 

Amay

R and S

22

 

Liège-Monsin

R

1

 

Hermalle-sous-Argenteau

R

5

 

Lixhe

R

7

Meuse

Cuijk

R

8

(Netherlands)

Alem

R

8

Hollands Diep

Moerdijk

R and S

7

(Rhine-Meuse delta,

(provided by M. Greijdanus - B. Reeze)

  

Netherlands)

'Midden' (provided by B. Reeze)

R and S

11

The sites are presented from upstream to downstream. Collector names are indicated when different from the authors. N COI = number of individuals sequenced for COI.

Table 4

Details of the populations of Corbicula studied.

River

Country

Location

Form

(R, Rlc, S)

Collectors

N

COI/cyt b

Meuse

France

See Table3

R

See Table3

176/20 (Table 3)

 

Belgium

 

R, S

  
 

Netherlands

 

R, S

  

Seine

France

Poses

R

Authors

6/3

   

S

 

6/3

Rhine

Germany

Köln

R

M. Weitere - C. Viergutz

10/5

   

S

 

3/3

Rhône

France

Creys

R

J. Mouthon

5/2

   

Rlc

 

9/5

Origin, collector and number of individuals sequenced for COI and cyt b genes. (R = form R, S = form S, Rlc = form Rlc, N COI /cyt b = number of individuals sequenced for COI /cyt b).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-11-147/MediaObjects/12862_2010_Article_1757_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Relationship between scores on Axis 1 and Axis 2 for the Principal Components Analysis for shell measurements on 429 specimens of Corbicula. R in red, Rlc in blue and S in green represent individuals of forms R, Rlc and S respectively. The type specimens of C. fluminalis, C. fluminea and C. leana are represented by symbols. Mo1 and Se26 are the two individuals exhibiting a mitochondrial-morphotype mismatch.

The lectotype of C. fluminea clustered with individuals of morphotypes R and Rlc on the biplot. The type specimen of C. leana was found in the margin of the group composed of individuals of form R only. The lectotype of C. fluminalis was found within the group of specimens of form S (Figure 1). The two individuals (Mo1 and Se26) showing a cytonuclear mismatch (see COI and cyt b sequences analysis below) were morphologically part of the R-Rlc group (Figure 1).

Sperm morphology

The sperm morphology of the three morphotypes of Corbicula (forms R, S and Rlc) was investigated because the biflagellate sperm type has been recognized as a diagnostic marker of androgenetic reproduction in this genus [15, 16, 18]. The analysis revealed biflagellate spermatozoa in the three morphotypes of Corbicula (forms R, S and Rlc). These three forms thus seem to reproduce through androgenesis like the invasive lineages found in America [18].

COI and cyt bsequences analysis

COI and cyt b sequences were obtained respectively from 215 and 41 specimens from Meuse, Seine, Rhine and Rhône (Tables 3, 4). The analysis revealed only three haplotypes each corresponding to one of the three morphotypes. All individuals of a same morphotype exhibited exactly the same haplotype (except for 2 individuals, see below). Sequence comparisons between the three COI haplotypes revealed 22 variable sites distributed throughout the sequenced fragment (681 bp) (Alignment provided in Additional file 1). For cyt b, only 10 sites out of 326 were variable (Additional file 2). Since our cyt b sequences were relatively short (326 bp) and a lower number of sequences for this gene are available for Corbicula, we have conducted the sequence analysis and the phylogenetic study with COI only.

One haplotype (COI haplotype 1) was found in all our sampled populations. This haplotype 1 was exclusively found in form R and its nucleotide sequence is identical to European C. fluminea (haplotype I, [40]) and haplotype H2 [41], the American form A [18, 34], the Japanese C. leana [34] and the Asian haplotype FW5 [31] (Tables 1, 2). We will refer to this COI haplotype as haplotype FW5 which was a common code used in Park & Kim [31] for all individuals of Corbicula with this COI sequence.

The second haplotype (COI haplotype 2) was found in all specimens of form S and in two specimens of form R (Table 2). Haplotype 2 is identical to the European "C. fluminea-like" COI haplotype IV from the Rhône [40] and haplotype H4 found in form S in the Rhine [42] and to the American form C [18] (Tables 1, 2). We will refer to this haplotype as haplotype FW17 as in Park & Kim [31]. Haplotype FW17 has not been found in any Asian population [31].

We observed a discrepancy between the mitochondrial lineage and morphology for two individuals of form R. The first one was a single individual from the River Meuse at Liège-Monsin (individual Mo1) and the second one is a single individual from the Seine (individual Se26). Both individuals had the morphotype R but exhibited the COI haplotype 2 (found in form S). The same results were obtained for cyt b haplotypes. We sequenced both genes again on new tissue samples from these two individuals and obtained the same results.

Our third haplotype (COI haplotype 3) was exclusively found in the individuals of form Rlc from the Rhône while form R from this same site had the haplotype 1 (FW5) (Table 2). Renard et al. [40] found COI haplotype IV in the five individuals studied from the Rhône; we did not find this haplotype IV in the new samples we obtained from River Rhône. Our haplotype 3 from the Rhône is identical to the sequence of C. fluminalis (haplotype V) from Renard et al. [40] (Table 2). Therefore, there is a discordance between our haplotypes and those obtained by Renard et al. [40] for form S. The same discrepancy was also reported by Pfenninger et al. [42] (Table 2). Our haplotype 3 is identical to the haplotype FW4 of the Indonesian C. subplanata [31, 50] (Table 1). We will here refer to haplotype FW4 as in Park & Kim [31]. This haplotype FW4 clusters with the American haplotype B1 (identities: 636/637 bp) and C. fluminea from Korea (identities: 613/614 bp) (Figure 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-11-147/MediaObjects/12862_2010_Article_1757_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Maximum Likelihood tree based on a 562 bp fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene from Corbicula spp. Posterior probabilities from Bayesian Inference (first) and bootstrap values from Maximum Likelihood (second) are indicated for nodes found in both analyses. Sequence of Neocorbicula limosa was used as an outgroup. See Table 1 for the origin of all the sequences. The three European morphotypes are indicated (form R, form S and form Rlc) and the frames are colour coded according to Fig. 1. Two individuals of form R exhibited the COI haplotype of form S (haplotype 2 = FW17).

Our analysis yielded only three haplotypes for all studied individuals among the four sampled European rivers. Surprisingly, Pfenninger et al. [42] recorded a larger number of COI haplotypes, especially in the River Rhine. We aligned all of these haplotypes and observed that some sequences contain several Ns or are shorter than most published sequences. We therefore included only some representative haplotypes of that study in our Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses.

Mitochondrial phylogeny (COIgene)

In total, 57 COI sequences of Corbicula available in GenBank, including those three sequences from the present study, were included in the phylogenetic analysis (Table 1). Out of these 57 sequences, 47 COI haplotypes were defined (Additional file 1). From the 714 positions (562 excluding gaps or missing data) including the outgroup, 158 sites were variable (28%). Only 13% of the sites remained variable when we excluded the outgroup, the estuarine lineages (see Figure 2) and C. madagascariensis.

Based on the lower value of Akaike information criterion (AIC), the GTR+γ model was selected for phylogenetic analysis. Neocorbicula limosa was used as an outgroup. ML analysis and BI gave a similar topology. The phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) shows two divergent clades: an "estuarine clade" (Asian C. fluminalis and C. japonica) and a "freshwater clade". Within this freshwater clade, C. madagascariensis is a sister-taxon to all other freshwater lineages of Corbicula. In this latter group, there is no clear geographic clustering of haplotypes of Corbicula, highlighting their cosmopolitan distribution. However the phylogenetic relationships between the freshwater lineages of Corbicula remain unresolved due to the low support (bootstrap and posterior probabilities) obtained for most clades. The three haplotypes of our study (referred to as FW4, FW5 and FW17 as in Park & Kim [31]) are each associated with a distinct freshwater subclade. Within each of these subclades, there are mostly representatives of Corbicula with biflagellate sperm (see Table 1) suggesting that these lineages reproduce through androgenesis [19]. However the clade containing haplotype FW4 also includes C. linduensis which has monoflagellate sperm [17], suggesting that this latter reproduces sexually.

Microsatellites

Nuclear markers were mainly used in this study to investigate the observed mismatches between mtDNA and nrDNA/morphotype. For all eleven polymorphic micosatellite loci, the two individuals with morphotype R and COI haplotype 2 (FW17) of form S (individuals Mo1 and Se26) exhibited exactly the same microsatellite genotype as the form R individuals. Therefore, both individuals clearly belong to the form R lineage at the morphological and nuclear levels but have the form S mitochondrial haplotype.

The same eleven microsatellite loci were also used to analyse several West European individuals of Corbicula belonging to the three different morphotypes (Table 5). For microsatellite locus ClB03, forms R and S present the same alleles (heterozygous; 2 alleles) while for the loci ClA02, ClB11 and C01 forms S and Rlc have the same allele size. Two loci (ClA01 and ClA03) did not amplify in form S, though they did amplify in the two specimens of form R with mtDNA COI haplotype 2 (as in form S). Two other loci (ClD06 and ClE01) did not amplify in form Rlc. The remaining four microsatellite loci amplified in all three forms and revealed differences in allele size between form R, S and Rlc. Since the microsatellite library was constructed for form R [51], it is not surprising that, due to the genetic divergence between the three forms, some loci did not cross-amplify in form S or Rlc (Table 5).
Table 5

Characteristics of polymorphic microsatellite loci and amplification in the three morphotypes of Corbicula of Western Europe.

Primer name

Morphotype

Repeat type

Ta (°C)

N

Size (bp)

ClA01

 

(gt)

   
 

R

 

53

27

198

 

S/R

 

53

2

198

 

S

 

53

23

-

 

Rlc

 

53

15

196

ClA02

 

(tg)

   
 

R

 

53

27

110-114

 

S/R

 

53

2

110-114

 

S

 

53

23

112-116

 

Rlc

 

53

15

112-116

ClA03

 

(tg)

   
 

R

 

53

27

192-194

 

S/R

 

53

2

192-194

 

S

 

53

23

-

 

Rlc

 

53

15

190

ClB03

 

(ag) (ga)

   
 

R

 

53

27

233-239

 

S/R

 

53

2

233-239

 

S

 

53

23

233-239

 

Rlc

 

53

15

239

ClB11

 

(ca)

   
 

R

 

53

27

311

 

S/R

 

53

2

311

 

S

 

53

23

311-313

 

Rlc

 

53

15

311-313

ClC01

 

(gt)

   
 

R

 

53

27

175-179

 

S/R

 

53

2

175-179

 

S

 

53

23

173-175

 

Rlc

 

53

15

173-175

ClC08

 

(ct) (ct)

   
 

R

 

55

27

216-220

 

S/R

 

55

2

216-220

 

S

 

55

23

260-306-(316)

 

Rlc

 

55

15

306

ClC12

 

(ac)

   
 

R

 

53

27

226

 

S/R

 

53

2

226

 

S

 

53

23

226-228

 

Rlc

 

53

15

230

ClD06

 

(gcgt)

   
 

R

 

53

27

199-207

 

S/R

 

53

2

199-207

 

S

 

53

23

237

 

Rlc

 

53

15

-

ClD12

 

(gtgc)

   
 

R

 

53

27

274-278

 

S/R

 

53

2

274-278

 

S

 

53

23

264-274

 

Rlc

 

53

15

274

ClE01

 

(tg)

   
 

R

 

53

27

213

 

S/R

 

53

2

213

 

S

 

53

23

209

 

Rlc

 

53

15

-

Ta = annealing temperature, N = number of individuals genotyped, Size = allele(s) size(s). S/R represents the two individuals with the COI haplotype 2 (like in form S) and the morphotype R. "R", "S" and "Rlc" refer to the three West European morphotypes.

Surprisingly, for each tested microsatellite locus, zero polymorphism was observed between individuals within each morphotype originating from different West-European populations. Only three distinct genotypes (genotypes 1, 2 and 3 for forms R, S and Rlc respectively) were identified. Bayesian clustering conducted using the STRUCTURE software revealed distinct categories, with the highest and most reliable probabilities for K = 3 (Additional file 3). This confirmed the observed differences between the three forms and the presence of only three invasive haplotypes/genotypes of Corbicula in Western Europe (Table 5).

These results are indicative of an overall very low genetic divergence within European Corbicula and could be related to their clonal reproductive mode.

Discussion

- Three European morphotypes/haplotypes/genotypes

The dark-coloured form R individuals we found correspond morphologically to the description of C. fluminea in [36, 41, 42]. Our morphological analysis did not provide a strong taxonomic assignment although the type specimen of C. leana was plotted near the group including form R. The sequence of haplotype 1, found in all studied individuals of form R in Europe (except the two "mismatches"), was identical to Asian haplotype FW5. Those results are congruent with those of Siripattrawan et al. [34] and Hedtke et al. [19] which concluded that populations of American form A (and therefore the European form R) are derived from populations of C. leana (haplotype FW5) from Japan. On the basis of these COI results, the European form R would not correspond to C. fluminea sensu stricto as previously assumed. Regarding the genotyping results, all 27 individuals of form R had one specific nuclear genotype (genotype 1) for the 11 tested loci.

The individuals of form S (Meuse, Seine and Rhine rivers) correspond morphologically to Corbicula fluminalis as defined by Renard et al. [40] and Korniushin [41]. Our morphological analysis, through the PCA, also showed similarity between the European form S and the lectotype of C. fluminalis from Mesopotamia. The COI haplotype 2 found in form S was identical to haplotype FW17 and to American haplotype C1 (of form C). Interestingly Park & Kim [31] already highlighted that no Asian haplotype corresponds to haplotype FW17. Genetic and morphological data of specimens from the native area of C. fluminalis (Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia) are needed to confirm the taxonomic assignment of the European form S/American form C. Our results also suggest that form S does not correspond to C. fluminalis sensu Park & Kim [31]. This Chinese, estuarine C. fluminalis was found in the same mitochondrial clade as C. japonica (Figure 2). Korniushin [41] already reconsidered this form as C. cf. japonica on the basis of anatomy and reproductive features. The genotyping results showed that all 23 European individuals of Corbicula of form S had the same, distinct nuclear genotype (genotype 2) for the 9 microsatellite loci that amplified in form S although these nuclear markers were developed for form R.

We obtained new samples from the Rhône and our analysis revealed the presence of two distinct COI lineages in this river: (i) the haplotype 1 (FW5) in individuals of form R and (ii) the haplotype 3 (FW4) found in specimens of form Rlc exclusively. The European light form Rlc had the same COI haplotype as the Indonesian C. subplanata, and was closely related to the American form B and Corbicula fluminea from Asia [19, 34]. Glaubrecht et al. [10, 17] already made the assumption that C. subplanata would be conspecific with the widespread C. fluminea. Hedtke et al. [19] concluded that the American form B would be derived from populations of the Asian lineage C. fluminea. As in form S, 9 microsatellite loci amplified in European form Rlc and revealed a third distinct genotype (genotype 3), being identical in all tested individuals of form Rlc.

The overall low genetic divergence between and within the three forms and the possibility of a peculiar hybridization through androgenesis between forms (see below) suggest that invasive lineages of Corbicula may represent a polymorphic species complex. Therefore we propose to use the nomenclature "form R", "form S" and "form Rlc" for the three West-European lineages of Corbicula.

- Unravelling discordant COI results

The sequence of haplotype 3 (FW4) we found in form Rlc (Rhône) was identical to the C. fluminalis - haplotype V and not to the expected haplotype IV of the Rhône found by Renard et al. [40]. This result of Renard et al. [40] is contrasting with our data and those of Pfenninger et al. [42]. Moreover, Renard et al. [40] included 6 individuals of the C. fluminalis form (form S) from the Meuse (Netherlands) but their sequence (COI haplotype V) does not correspond to the one we found (haplotype 2) in our sampling of morphotype S and it does not correspond to haplotype H4 from form S published by Pfenninger et al. [42] (see Table 2). We do not have any evidence of temporal changes in the studied populations and we therefore hypothesize a mismatch between the published sequences and their associated names/populations in the paper of Renard et al. [40]. More specifically, the COI sequence assigned to C. fluminalis (haplotype V) in their publication actually belongs to the individuals from the Rhône (their third unidentified lineage) and corresponds to our form Rlc (also from the Rhône), while their sequence of haplotype IV (Rhône) corresponds to their specimens of C. fluminalis as Pfenninger et al. [42] and this study demonstrated. In Table 2, we present a summary of the incongruence and a comparison of European, American and Asian COI haplotypes of Corbicula.

- Mitochondrial/morphotype-nuclear mismatch

In Europe and North America, most individuals of Corbicula with the same morphotype belong to the same mitochondrial lineage ([18, 19, 42], this study). In addition, in this study we have preliminary indications that the same Corbicula morphotype also belongs to a single genotype although more individuals should be investigated. However, we detected a discrepancy between the mitochondrial lineage and, the morphology and the nuclear lineage of two specimens of form R, one from the Meuse and one from the Seine, two of the three rivers where we found forms R and S in sympatry. These individuals with morphotype R exhibit the mitochondrial haplotype of form S (for both cyt b and COI) but all polymorphic microsatellite markers identified a form R nuclear DNA origin (genotype 1) for both specimens. In the absence of recent nuclear exchange between the morphotypes, the observed mismatch could be explained by double uniparental inheritance (DUI), population polymorphism in the ancestor of the species or egg parasitism between the species [19]. Hedtke et al. [19] did not find any evidence of DUI in individuals presenting a mtDNA/morphotype mismatch. The hypothesis of a polymorphic ancestor was rejected on the basis of their phylogenetic analysis [19]. Hedtke et al. [19] therefore concluded that this observed discrepancy could only be the consequence of an androgenetic "egg capture": after fertilization between the unreduced sperm of one haplotype and the egg of a distinct haplotype, the maternal nuclear DNA from the egg is extruded. The descendant therefore contain paternal nuclear DNA while they retain the maternal mitochondrial DNA, resulting in a cytonuclear mismatch as observed here for two individuals.

A similar cytonuclear mismatch was observed in some American populations between forms A and B and between forms B and C living in sympatry [18, 19]. Discrepancies between nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies have already been reported for Corbicula [42, 44]. According to our mitochondrial phylogeny and our microsatellite data, the disjunction found in our two singular individuals would imply a spermatozoon of lineage R that "parasitized" an egg of lineage S.

- Androgenesis and invasiveness

In freshwater ecosystems, Corbicula fluminea sensu lato is considered one of the most invasive species [3] because of its large geographic dispersal and invasive behaviour [3, 20, 24]. The invasive success of lineages of Corbicula is attributed to their following biological traits: rapid growth and maturation, high fecundity, excellent dispersal capacities and association with human activities [3]. However, their unique reproductive mode might also play a role in the invasiveness of lineages of Corbicula while this has never been highlighted. Our phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2) demonstrates that the "freshwater clade" includes both sexual dioecious and androgenetic lineages. The sexual lineages are mostly restricted to limited Asian areas, e.g. C. sandai which is endemic to Lake Biwa (Japan) or C. matannensis which is endemic to Indonesia. Moreover, it has been shown that, on a limited spatial scale, the lacustrine lineages of Corbicula from Sulawesi (Indonesia) form well-defined genetic clades [50] while identical or closely related haplotypes of the androgenetic lineages are found over large geographic distances, both in the native and invaded regions ([31, 50], this study). This emphasizes that androgenesis seems to favour the invasive success of these clams. More specifically, androgenetic Corbicula are hermaphrodites and capable of self-fertilization. Therefore, a single individual may easily found a new population if the conditions are favourable. This is one of the main advantages of asexual as compared to sexual lineages [52].

In addition, our genetic analysis of European populations of Corbicula revealed an absence of polymorphism within each form. Many invasive species escape low levels of genetic diversity owing to multiple and/or repeated introduction events [53, 54]. On the contrary, there is a "prevalence of genetic bottlenecks" in invasive species with several species showing a low genetic diversity but a high invasive potential [55]. This is considered the "genetic paradox of invasive species" [5558]. In the case of Corbicula, further investigations should assess the genetic diversity of the native populations to determine whether the invasive forms have encountered genetic bottlenecks or not. Due to androgenesis several of the lineages in the native area may indeed contain a low genetic diversity. Whatever the origin of their low genetic diversity, invasive lineages of Corbicula represent one of those examples of "genetic paradox". Phenotypic plasticity, which is particularly high in molluscs, might have played an important role in the adaptation to and colonization of new environments as demonstrated in many other invasive species [5961]. In other words, those three invasive clonal lineages of Corbicula, particularly form R dominating in Western Europe, could be "general purpose genotypes" or even "super-genotypes" associated with high levels of plasticity in response to fluctuating environmental conditions [62, 63].

However, a certain level of genetic diversity in Corbicula may be found in the combination of a nuclear genome of one lineage with a new mitochondrial genome of a different lineage as a result of androgenesis between lineages. This may provide a higher advantage to androgenetic lineages compared to other asexually reproducing species. Mitochondrial capture has already been pointed out as dispersal strategy in the endangered cypress tree Cupressus dupreziana. This androgenetic organism produces diploid pollen that may in turn fertilize the ovule of the related, common species Cupressus sempervirens. This latter species, then, acts as a surrogate mother [64, 65]. Moreover, androgenesis allows an elevation of ploidy when there is mixing of nuclear genomes during incomplete extrusion of the maternal nuclear genome [19, 45, 46].

- Androgenetic species: the pitfall of mitochondrial phylogenies

Several studies revealed mitochondrial/morphotype discrepancies in populations of Corbicula where distinct forms live in sympatry ([18, 19, 42], this study) and hypothesized that it was the consequence of an androgenetic egg parasitism ([18, 19], this study). We would like to highlight here that this type of mitochondrial capture could lead to inaccurate species delimitation. The mitochondrial gene tree only traces the maternal lineage and it is, in the case of androgenesis, misleading for species relationships. Until now, most phylogenetic studies in Corbicula have relied mainly or solely on mitochondrial data, but this can result in the grouping of distinct nuclear lineages in the same mitochondrial cluster. Therefore the use of an "integrative taxonomy" approach as developped here, combining nuclear and mitochondrial data along with morphology, is essential to verify the phylogenetic relationships within androgenetic taxa such as Corbicula. Moreover, we suggest that due to these peculiar hybridization events between lineages as a consequence of an androgenetic mode of reproduction, invasive European Corbicula should be considered as a polymorphic species complex including three distinct clusters. For example, the European form S and the American form C have the same COI sequence but appear very different on the basis of shell morphology compared to pictures of form C from Lee et al. [18]. The observed differences in shell shapes could be related to phenotypic plasticity, but alternatively, forms S and C could also belong to distinct nuclear lineages sharing the same mitochondrial DNA through androgenesis. The same hypothesis seems confirmed by preliminary results in the COI cluster "form B - form Rlc". These morphs can easily be distinguished: the form B from the Americas has a deep purple inner shell surface while the form Rlc from Europe has a whitish inner shell surface. The assessment of cross-amplification of microsatellite loci in American forms revealed that form B and form Rlc have distinct genotypes [51]. They therefore belong to distinct clusters at the nuclear level.

Conclusions

The three different morphotypes of Corbicula found in Europe are clearly distinct at the mitochondrial and nuclear level. The European form S seems related to C. fluminalis on the basis of morphology while mitochondrial data suggest that forms R and Rlc are derived from the androgenetic C. leana and C. fluminea respectively. However this taxonomic assignment remains uncertain and, due to the weak phylogenetic signal among freshwater Corbicula, these could be considered as a polymorphic species complex. Moreover, species delineation in Corbicula is even more complicated since we have to take into account the possibility of androgenesis and egg capture between the different morphotypes as observed in this study for two individuals. Hedtke et al. [19] also demonstrated that nuclear exchange is possible and that the nuclear DNA of the American Corbicula form B originated from hybridization of separate nuclear lineages. As a consequence, taxonomic assignment in androgenetic lineages based on mitochondrial phylogeny only may be biased, and using an "integrative taxonomy" approach combining nuclear and mitochondrial data along with morphology may at least avoid the pitfall of pooling divergent evolutionary nuclear lineages. We therefore recommend using the proposed nomenclature form R, form S and form Rlc for convenience in differentiating the three invasive European Corbicula lineages.

Furthermore our phylogeny highlights that the cosmopolitan, invasive forms of Corbicula have identical or closely related haplotypes and seem to be androgenetic while the sexual, dioecious lineages seem restricted to the native Asian areas. Androgenesis would thus play an important role in the invasive success of Corbicula clams, especially because they are hermaphrodites and capable of self-fertilization.

Methods

Specimen collection

Live specimens were collected from 23 localities in the Meuse river in France, Belgium and the Netherlands (Table 3), and from one site in the Seine river in France (Table 4). Additional specimens from one locality in the Rhine and one in the Rhône were obtained (Table 4). Specimens were immediately processed or preserved in 96% ethanol prior to analysis. Individuals from the Meuse and Seine rivers were collected in fish bypasses with a handnet or directly from the river bottom with a handnet, or dug out from the sediment with an Eckman dredge.

Morphological analysis

The shell morphology of the different morphs from Meuse, Rhine, Rhône and Seine rivers was analysed. The shells of 429 individuals were measured for length (L), height (H) and width (W) with a calliper: "L" is the maximal anteroposterior dimension, "H" is the maximal dorsoventral dimension and "W" is the maximal width of the valves. We also included published measurements of the lectotypes of C. fluminea and C. fluminalis [20] and of the original description of C. leana [26]. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out using the table of the three morphometric ratios (H/L, H/W and L/W). Calculations were performed and graphics drawn using R software with the ade4 package [66]. The function "dudi.pca" was used to apply the PCA to the correlation matrix. Scores from axis 1 were plotted against those from axis 2, each point was identified individually.

Sperm morphology

Biflagellate sperm is indicative of androgenesis in the genus Corbicula [15, 16, 18]. We analysed the sperm morphology of specimens of form R (Meuse, N = 4), form S (Rhine and Seine, N = 5) and form Rlc (Rhône, N = 3). To isolate and observe the spermatozoa, a protocol was adapted from several studies [6769]. The individuals preserved in absolute ethanol were opened and the visceral mass, which includes the gonads, was cut. The tissue was collected in a tube and collagenase resuspended in RPMI was added (final concentration: 1 mg/l). The tissue was sheared and collagenase-RPMI mix was added to a final volume of 600 μl. The preparation was then incubated at 45°C until complete degradation. The samples were centrifuged during 3 minutes at 3000 rpm. One drop of the undernatant was put on a glass slide and observed under a light microscope at 100× magnification.

Gene amplification and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the adductor muscles or the foot of 215 individual specimens (fresh or preserved in 96% ethanol) using the DNeasy blood & tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A fragment of 710 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene and a fragment (430 bp) of the cytochrome b (cyt b) gene were amplified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using the primers LCOI490 and HCO2198 [70] and, UCYTB151F and UCYTB270R, respectively [71]. Amplifications were performed in 25 μl total volume including 0.5 μl of gDNA, 1× GoTaq Green reaction buffer (Promega), 200 μM of dNTPs (Promega), 0.5 μM of both primers and 0.1 U of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). PCR conditions were: 4 min at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at annealing temperature (45 °C for COI and 42°C for cyt b) and 45 s at 72°C, and then a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were purified and sequenced with each universal primer on an automated ABI3730XL Genetic Analyzer (Macrogen Inc.). COI and cyt b sequences were deposited in GenBank [GU721082-GU721084; JF518976-JF518978]. Sequences were visualized and aligned using BioEdit 7.0.5.3 [72].

Phylogenetic analyses (COI)

The evolutionary model for the phylogenetic analysis of COI sequences was selected using jModelTest 0.1 software [73]. Maximum-likelihood trees were constructed with PhyML 2.4.5 software and bootstrap values were obtained for 1,000 replicates [74]. A Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was performed using MrBayes 3.1.2 [75]. We ran four independent analyses with four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) each, for 4 million generations. Trees and parameters were sampled every 100 generations. To ensure stabilization, we discarded the first 25% of sampled trees. The remaining trees were used to compute a consensus tree. The split frequency was below 0.01. For all analyses, published COI sequence of Neocorbicula limosa was used as an outgroup. A total of 54 sequences from several Corbicula lineages available on GenBank were included (origins in Table 1). Trees were visualized using MEGA4 [76].

Microsatellite study

We used eleven microsatellite loci described in Pigneur et al. [51] to analyze individuals of the three observed European morphotypes (see Table 5 for the number of tested individuals). Regarding the samples from the Meuse, Rhône and Rhine, the individuals analyzed in the present study are different from those used in Pigneur et al. [65]. For each locus, the amplification was performed in 10 μl total volume including 0.5 μl of gDNA, 1× GoTaq reaction buffer (Promega), 200 μM of dNTPs (Promega), 0.5 μM of both primers and 0.1 U of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). The forward primers were 5' fluorescently labelled and fitted with a GTTTCTT PIG-tail. Amplification by PCR was performed as follows: 4 min at 94°C followed by 30 cycles: 45 s at 94°C, annealing for 45 s and 72°C for 45 s, and then a final extension of 12 min at 72°C. The fragments were analysed on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer with GeneScan-500 (LIZ) size standard (Applied Biosystems). Results were visualized using GENEMAPPER software (Applied Biosystems). Additionally, the microsatellite results were analyzed using Bayesian clustering with the STRUCTURE software version 2.0 [77] to define the number of categories (K) of individuals. STRUCTURE was run for 10 repetitions of each K from 1 to 5 assuming admixture. Analysis was performed using a burn-in period of 50,000 followed by 200,000 MCMC repetitions.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are due to B. Reeze and M. Greijdanus (samples from Hollands Diep), C. Lamine and C. Martin (samples from Tihange nuclear plant, Meuse river), C. Viergutz and M. Weitere (samples from Rhine river), and J. Mouthon (samples from Rhône river) for specimen collection. We are grateful to A.-L. Tarbe, S. Stenuite, X. Li, L. Viroux, B. Leporcq and A. Evrard for help during lab and field work. We also thank Dr. S. Hedtke and Dr. T. Backeljau for fruitful discussions and three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful comments and critical reading of this manuscript.

This study received financial support from the University of Namur (FUNDP) and from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Unit in Environmental and Evolutionary Biology (URBE), University of Namur (FUNDP)

References

  1. den Hartog C, van den Brink FBW, van der Velde G: Why was the invasion of the River Rhine by Corophium curvispinum and Corbicula species so successful?. J Nat Hist. 1992, 26: 1121-1129. 10.1080/00222939200770651.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mouthon J, Parghentanian T: Comparison of the life cycle and population dynamics of two Corbicula species, C. fluminea and C. fluminalis (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) in two French canals. Archiv Hydrobiol. 2004, 161: 267-287. 10.1127/0003-9136/2004/0161-0267.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sousa R, Antunes C, Guilhermino L: Ecology of the invasive Asian clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) in aquatic ecosystems: an overview. Ann Limnol - Int J Lim. 2008, 44: 85-94. 10.1051/limn:2008017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen RRH, Dresler PV, Phillips EJP, Cory RL: The effect of the Asiatic clam, Corbicula fluminea, on phytoplankton of the Potomac River, Maryland. Limnol Oceanogr. 1984, 29: 170-180. 10.4319/lo.1984.29.1.0170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC: The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol. 2001, 46: 1431-1446. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00771.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Descy J-P, Everbecq E, Gosselain V, Viroux L, Smitz JS: Modelling the impact of benthic filter-feeders on the composition and biomass of river plankton. Freshw Biol. 2003, 48: 404-417. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01017.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuller SLH, Imlay M: Spatial competition between Corbicula manilensis (Philippi), the Chinese clam (Corbiculidae), and fresh-water mussels (Unionidae) in the Waccamaw River basin of the Carolinas (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Assoc Southeastern Biol Bull. 1976, 23: 60-Google Scholar
  8. Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Kesterton T, Padilla DK: Dominance of the Asiatic clam, Corbicula fluminea (Müller) in the benthic community of a reservoir. J Shellfish Res. 2003, 22: 487-493.Google Scholar
  9. Isom BG: Historical review of Asiatic clam (Corbicula) invasion and biofouling of waters and industries in the Americas. Am Malacol Bull Special Edition. 1986, 2: 1-5.Google Scholar
  10. Glaubrecht M, Fehér Z, von Rintelen T: Brooding in Corbicula madagascariensis (Bivalvia, Corbiculidae) and the repeated evolution of viviparity in corbiculids. Zool Scri. 2006, 35: 641-654. 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2006.00252.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Komaru A, Kawagishi T, Konishi K: Cytological evidence of spontaneous androgenesis in the freshwater clam Corbicula leana Prime. Dev Genes Evol. 1998, 208: 46-50. 10.1007/s004270050152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishibashi R, Ookubo K, Aoki M, Utaki M, Komaru A, Kawamura K: Androgenetic reproduction in a freshwater diploid clam Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae). Zool Sci. 2003, 20: 727-732. 10.2108/zsj.20.727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Komaru A, Konishi K: Non-reductional spermatozoa in three shell color types of the freshwater clam Corbicula fluminea in Taiwan. Zool Sci. 1999, 16: 105-108. 10.2108/zsj.16.105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ishibashi R, Komaru A, Ookubo K, Kiyomoto M: The second meiosis occurs in cytochalasin D-treated eggs of Corbicula leana even though it is not observed in control androgenetic eggs because the maternal chromosomes and centrosomes are extruded at first meiosis. Dev Biol. 2002, 244: 37-43. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0590.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Konishi K, Kawamura K, Furuita H, Komaru A: Spermatogenesis of the freshwater clam Corbicula aff. fluminea Müller (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae). J Shellfish Res. 1998, 17: 185-189.Google Scholar
  16. Byrne M, Phelps H, Church T, Adair V, Selvakumaraswamy P, Potts J: Reproduction and development of the freshwater clam Corbicula australis in southeast Australia. Hydrobiologia. 2000, 418: 185-197. 10.1023/A:1003986512832.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaubrecht M, von Rintelen T, Korniushin AV: Toward a systematic revision of brooding freshwater Corbiculidae in Southeast Asia (Bivalvia, Veneroida): on shell morphology, anatomy and molecular genetics of endemic taxa from islands in Indonesia. Malacologia. 2003, 45: 11-40.Google Scholar
  18. Lee T, Siripattrawan S, Ituarte CF, Foighil DO: Invasion of the clonal clams: Corbicula lineages in the New World. Am Malac Bull. 2005, 20: 113-122.Google Scholar
  19. Hedtke SM, Stanger-Hall K, Baker RJ, Hillis DM: All-male asexuality: origin and maintenance of androgenesis in the Asian clam Corbicula. Evolution. 2008, 62: 1119-1136. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00344.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Araujo R, Moreno D, Ramos M: The Asiatic clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) in Europe. Amer Malac Bull. 1993, 10: 39-49.Google Scholar
  21. Counts CL: Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia: Sphaeriacea) in British Columbia. Nautilus. 1981, 95: 12-13.Google Scholar
  22. McMahon RF: The occurrence and spread of the introduced Asiatic freshwater clam, Corbicula fluminea (Müller), in North America: 1924-1982. Nautilus. 1982, 96: 134-141.Google Scholar
  23. Ituarte CF: Corbicula and Neocorbicula (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) in the Paranà, Uruguay, and Río de La Plata basins. Nautilus. 1994, 107: 129-135.Google Scholar
  24. Mouthon J: Sur la présence en France et au Portugal de Corbicula (Bivalvia, Corbiculidae) originaire d'Asie. Basteria. 1981, 45: 109-116.Google Scholar
  25. Kijviriya V, Upatham ES, Viyanant V, Woodruff DS: Genetic studies of Asiatic clams, Corbicula, in Thailand: Allozymes of 21 nominal species are identical. Am Malacol Bull. 1991, 8: 97-106.Google Scholar
  26. Prime T: Notes on the species of the family Corbiculidae, with figures. Annals Lyceum Nat Hist New York. 1864, 8: 57-92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Prime T: Notes on the species of the family Corbiculidae, with figures. Annals Lyceum Nat Hist New York. 1866, 8: 213-237.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Prashad B: Zoological results of a tour in the Far East. Revision of the Japanese species of the genus Corbicula. Mem of the As Soc of Bengal. 1924, 6: 522-529.Google Scholar
  29. Morton B: Corbicula in Asia. Proceedings of the First International Corbicula Symposium; Fort Worth, Texas. Edited by: Britton JC. 1979, Texas Christian University Research Foundation, 15-38.Google Scholar
  30. Park J-K, Choe BL, Eom KS: Two mitochondrial lineages in Korean freshwater Corbicula (Corbiculidae: Bivalvia). Mol Cells. 2004, 17: 410-414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Park J-K, Kim W: Two Corbicula (Corbiculidae: Bivalvia) mitochondrial lineages are widely distributed in Asian freshwater environment. Mol Phylog Evol. 2003, 29: 529-539. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00138-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hillis DM, Patton J: Morphological and electrophoretic evidence for two species of Corbicula (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) in North America. Am Midl Nat. 1982, 108: 74-80. 10.2307/2425294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Counts CL: The zoogeography and history of the invasion of the United States by Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae), special edition. Proceedings of the Second International Corbicula Symposium. Edited by: Britton JC. 1986, American Malacological Union, 7-39.Google Scholar
  34. Siripattrawan S, Park JK, O'Foighil D: Two lineages of the introduced Asian freshwater clam Corbicula occur in North America. J Mollus Stud. 2000, 66: 423-429. 10.1093/mollus/66.3.423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Haesloop U: Establishment of the Asiatic clam Corbicula cf. fluminalis in the tidal Weser river (N. Germany). Archiv Hydrobiol. 1992, 126: 175-180.Google Scholar
  36. Mouthon J: Répartition du genre Corbicula Megerle von Mühlfeld (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) en France à l'aube du XXIe siècle. Hydroécol Appl. 2000, 12: 135-146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Brancotte V, Vincent T: L'invasion du réseau hydrographique français par les mollusques Corbicula spp. Modalité de colonisation et rôle prépondérant des canaux de navigation. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic. 2002, 365/366: 325-337.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Werner S, Rothhaupt K-O: Effects of the invasive bivalve Corbicula fluminea on settling juveniles and other benthic taxa. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2007, 26: 673-680. 10.1899/07-017R.1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Marescaux J, Pigneur L-M, Van Doninck K: New records of Corbicula clams in French rivers. Aquatic Invasions. 2010, 5: S35-S39. 10.3391/ai.2010.5.S1.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Renard E, Bachmann V, Cariou ML, Moreteau JC: Morphological and molecular differentiation of invasive freshwater species of the genus Corbicula (Bivalvia, corbiculidea) suggest the presence of three taxa in French rivers. Mol Ecol. 2000, 9: 2009-2016. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.01104.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Korniushin AV: A revision of some Asian and African freshwater clams assigned to Corbicula fluminalis (Müller, 1774) (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Corbiculidae), with a review of anatomical characters and reproductive features based on museum collections. Hydrobiologia. 2004, 529: 251-270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Pfenninger M, Reinhardt F, Streit B: Evidence for cryptic hybridization between different evolutionary lineages of the invasive clam genus Corbicula (Veneroida, Bivalvia). J Evol Biol. 2002, 15: 818-829. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00440.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sousa R, Freire R, Rufino M, Mendez J, Gaspar M, Antunes C, Guilhermino L: Genetic and shell morphological variability of the invasive bivalve Corbicula fluminea (Muller, 1774) in two Portuguese estuaries. Est Coast Shelf Sci. 2007, 74: 166-174. 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Park J-K, Lee JS, Kim W: A single mitochondrial lineage is shared by morphologically and allozymatically distinct freshwater Corbicula clones. Mol Cells. 2002, 14: 318-322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Komaru A, Kumamoto A, Ishibashi R: Possible elevation of ploidy levels by accidental formation of female pronucleus in androgenetic clam Corbicula leana. Dev Biol. 2001, 18: 87-Google Scholar
  46. Komaru A, Kumamoto A, Kato T, Ishibashi R, Obata M, Nemoto T: A hypothesis of ploidy elevation by formation of a female pronucleus in the androgenetic clam Corbicula fluminea in the Tone River Estuary, Japan. Zool Sci. 2006, 23: 529-532. 10.2108/zsj.23.529.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Komaru A, Konishi K, Nakayama I, Kobayashi T, Sakai H, Kawamura K: Hermaphroditic freshwater clams in the genus Corbicula produce non-reductional spermatozoa with somatic DNA content. Biol Bull. 1997, 193: 320-323. 10.2307/1542934.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Qiu A, Shi A, Komaru A: Yellow and brown shell colour morphs of Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae) from Sichuan Province, China, are triploids and tetraploids. J Shellfish Res. 2001, 20: 323-328.Google Scholar
  49. Dayrat B: Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linn Soc. 2005, 85: 407-415. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. von Rintelen T, Glaubrecht M: Rapid evolution of sessility in an endemic species flock of the freshwater bivalve Corbicula from ancient lakes on Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biol Lett. 2006, 2: 73-77. 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Pigneur L-M, Risterucci A-M, Dauchot N, Li X, Van Doninck K: Development of novel microsatellite markers to identify the different invasive lineages in the Corbiculacomplex and to assess androgenesis. Mol Ecol Res.
  52. Maynard Smith J: The Evolution of Sex. 1978, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Rodríguez Schettino L, Lara AC, Larson A, Losos JB: Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature. 2004, 431: 177-181. 10.1038/nature02807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lavergne S, Molofsky J: Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 3883-3888. 10.1073/pnas.0607324104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Holland BS: Invasion without a bottleneck: microsatellite variation in natural and invasive populations of the brown mussel Perna perna (L). Mar Biotechnol. 2001, 3: 407-415. 10.1007/s1012601-0060-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Puillandre N, Dupas D, Dangles O, Zeddam JL, Barbin K, Silvain JF: Genetic bottleneck in invasive species: the potato tuber moth adds to the list. Biological Invasions. 2008, 10: 319-333. 10.1007/s10530-007-9132-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Reed DH, Frankham R: Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol. 2003, 17: 230-237. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01236.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Golani D, Azzurro E, Corsini-Foka M, Falautano M, Andaloro F, Bernardi G: Genetic bottlenecks and successful invasions: the case of a recent Lessepsian migrant. Biol Lett. 2007, 3: 541-545. 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Dybdhal MF, Kane SL: Adaptation VS phenotypic plasticity in the success of a clonal invader. Ecology. 2005, 86: 1592-1601. 10.1890/04-0898.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Geng YP, Pan XY, Xu CY, Zhang WJ, Li B, Chen JK, Lu BR, Song ZP: Phenotypic plasticity rather than locally adapted ecotypes allows the invasive alligator weed to colonize a wide range of habitats. Biol Inv. 2007, 9: 245-256. 10.1007/s10530-006-9029-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Poulin J, Sakai AK, Weller SG, Nguyen T: Phenotypic plasticity, precipitation, and invasiveness in the fire-promoting grass Pennisetum setaceum (Poaceae). Am J Bot. 2007, 94: 533-541. 10.3732/ajb.94.4.533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Vrijenhoek RC, Parker ED: Geographical parthenogenesis, general purpose genotypes and frozen niche variation. Lost Sex. Edited by: Schön I, Martens K, Van Dijk P. 2009, Berlin: Springer Publications, 99-131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Le Roux JJ, Wieczorek AM, Wright MG, Tran CT: Super-genotype: global monoclonality defies the odds of nature. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2:Google Scholar
  64. Pichot C, El Maâtaoui M, Raddi S, Raddi R: Surrogate mother for endangered Cupressus. Nature. 2001, 412: 39-10.1038/35083687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pichot C, Liens B, Rivera Nava JL, Bachelier JB, El Maâtaoui M: Cypress surrogate mother produces haploid progeny from alien pollen. Genetics. 2008, 178: 379-383. 10.1534/genetics.107.080572.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Dray S, Dufour AB: The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw. 2007, 22: 1-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Britton JC, Morton B: A dissection guide, field and laboratory manual for the introduced bivalve Corbicula fluminea. Malac Rev. 1982, suppl 3
  68. Guo X, Allen SK: Reproductive potential and genetics of triploid Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg). Biol Bull. 1994, 187: 309-318. 10.2307/1542288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Howard DR, Trantow CM, Thaler CD: Motility of a biflagellate sperm: waveform analysis and cyclic nucleotide activation. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2004, 59: 120-130. 10.1002/cm.20027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R: DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotech. 1994, 3: 294-299.Google Scholar
  71. Merrit TJS, Shi L, Chase MC, Rex MA, Etter RJ, Quattro JM: Universal cytochrome b primers facilitate intraspecific studies in molluscan taxa. Mol Mar Biol Biotech. 1998, 7: 7-11.Google Scholar
  72. Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999, 41: 95-98.Google Scholar
  73. Posada D: jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 1253-1256. 10.1093/molbev/msn083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52: 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 754-755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnely P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000, 155: 945-959.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pigneur et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.