Open Access

A horizontal gene transfer supported the evolution of an early metazoan biomineralization strategy

  • Daniel J Jackson1Email author,
  • Luciana Macis1,
  • Joachim Reitner1 and
  • Gert Wörheide2, 3
BMC Evolutionary Biology201111:238

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-238

Received: 16 June 2011

Accepted: 12 August 2011

Published: 12 August 2011

Abstract

Background

The synchronous and widespread adoption of the ability to biomineralize was a defining event for metazoan evolution during the late Precambrian/early Cambrian 545 million years ago. However our understanding on the molecular level of how animals first evolved this capacity is poor. Because sponges are the earliest branching phylum of biomineralizing metazoans, we have been studying how biocalcification occurs in the coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana.

Results

We have isolated and characterized a novel protein directly from the calcified spherulites of A. willeyana. Using three independent lines of evidence (genomic architecture of the gene in A. willeyana, spatial expression of the gene product in A. willeyana and genomic architecture of the gene in the related demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica), we show that the gene that encodes this protein was horizontally acquired from a bacterium, and is now highly and exclusively expressed in spherulite forming cells.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the ancient and close association that exists between sponges and bacteria, and provide support for the notion that horizontal gene transfer may have been an important mechanism that supported the evolution of this early metazoan biomineralisation strategy.

Background

The fossil record of early animal life could be briefly summarized as a period dominated by soft-bodied organisms that were replaced at the dawn of the Phanerozoic by an unprecedented diversity and disparity of animals able to form mineralized structures [14]. Decoding the genetic and molecular mechanisms that instruct the assembly of mineralized body parts is therefore of great importance if we are to have a complete understanding of how complex animal life evolved. Because sponges evolved the capacity to construct a skeleton early on in their evolution [1], and are widely thought to be the earliest branching metazoan phylum [5, 6], we have been investigating the genetic and molecular basis of biocalcification in the coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana [7, 8]. Some coralline sponges, such as A. willeyana, construct their calcified skeletons by accreting individual microscopic spherulites together (Figure 1a-c), a strategy employed by reef forming sponges known from the Permian and Triassic [9]. Recently we demonstrated that spherulites in A. willeyana are initially formed by calcifying the organic remains of degraded bacteria [8] via the activity of at least one highly conserved biomineralizing enzyme [7]. Here we show that a major proteinaceous component of the A. willeyana skeleton, which is likely to be directly involved in spherulite formation, was horizontally transferred from a bacterium into the A. willeyana genome.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-11-238/MediaObjects/12862_2011_1836_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

A. willeyana and characterization of Awi-Spherulin expression. (A) Lateral and (B), apical views of A. willeyana. (C) Expanded view of the boxed region in (B) illustrates nascent spherulites. (D), SDS-PAGE gel of organic material extracted from purified spherulites. The band at 52 kDa (arrow) is Awi-Spherulin. Bands indicated by asterisks are Astrosclerin. (E) Apical view similar to that in (C) following WMISH against Awi-Spherulin. Positive cells have a distribution indicative of a role in spherulite formation. (F-H) Sections of WMISH preparations show Awi-Spherulin is expressed within spherulite forming cells. (I-K) WMISH against Astrosclerin reveals the same expression pattern as Awi-Spherulin. Arrowhead in (I) indicates the insoluble organic matrix of an individual spherulite.

Results and Discussion

Isolation and evolutionary characterization of the novel biocalcification protein Spherulin

Using previously described de-mineralization, protein extraction and separation techniques [7], our continuing efforts to characterize the spherulitic proteome of A. willeyana identified a prominent protein of 52 kDa on SDS-PAGE gels. This band was excised, and an amino terminal fragment sequenced by Edman degradation. The resulting peptide was used to design degenerate PCR primers which amplified a fragment of DNA from a cDNA library. This was cloned, sequenced and used to design gene specific primers that allowed the full-length cDNA to be isolated (Additional file 1). Due to the association of this protein with spherulites we have named it 'Spherulin'.

Initial BLAST searches using partial RACE fragments returned hits against uncharacterized proteins with similarity to sugar transporters derived exclusively from bacteria. Conversely, exhaustive BLAST searches directed against a wide phylogenetic range of eukaryotic unicellular and multicellular draft or complete genomes (more than 270) did not return any positive hits (see Additional file 2 for a complete list of eukaryotic genomes searched). One exception to this was the identification of a clear Spherulin homolog in the draft genome of the demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica. This restricted phylogenetic distribution of Spherulin led us to the initial hypothesis that the poriferan Spherulin sequences were in fact derived from the abundant bacterial communities known to exist throughout A. willeyana and A. queenslandica, and which are particularly numerous within the cells that initiate spherulite formation in A. willeyana [8, 9]. However, once we isolated the full length mRNA from A. willeyana the presence of a putative poly-A signal and poly-A tail (Additional file 1) suggested that this may not be a bacterially derived gene product, and could be the product of a horizontal gene transfer (HGT).

Three independent lines of evidence demonstrate Spherulinis now located within poriferan genomes

To test this hypothesis we first localized Awi-Spherulin expression using whole mount in situ hybridization (WMISH). These experiments clearly show that Awi-Spherulin is expressed in the same spherulite forming cells that Astrosclerin is expressed in (Figure 1f-k), a gene we previously demonstrated to be involved in spherulite formation [7]. Furthermore, endobiotic bacteria associated with A. willeyana are visible following WMISH, and Spherulin expression was not detected in these bacterial cells after multiple rounds of WMISH (data not shown).

We also investigated the genomic architectures of Awi- and Aqu-Spherulin. We amplified Awi-Spherulin from genomic DNA and found that the amplicon was 940 bp larger than the cDNA derived product. The 940 bp of additional sequence possessed the characteristics of a typical spliceosomal intron with classic GT-AG donor/acceptor sites [10], a polypyrimidine tract 5' of the acceptor site [11], and several adenine residues immediately upstream of this tract that could act as intron break point residues [12] (Figure 2a). The presence of this splicesomal intron indicates that the Awi-Spherulin gene is now located within the A. willeyana genome.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-11-238/MediaObjects/12862_2011_1836_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Genomic architectures of Awi- and Aqu-Spherulin and their evolutionary relationships with homologous prokaryotic sequences. (A) Awi-Spherulin possesses a signal sequence (highlighted grey) indicating it is located extracellularly, within which a 940 bp intron is located. GT/AG splice sites (highlighted red), a polypyrimidine tract (highlighted blue) and putative adenine break point residues (arrows) are indicated. (B) Aqu-Spherulin is located on genome scaffold 13507 (schematically represented here reverse complimented), and is immediately flanked by eukaryotic specific sequences. Scaffold locations are indicated. (C) Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic and prokaryotic Spherulin sequences.

While the A. queenslandica Spherulin homolog is intron-less, genomic sequence immediately flanking Aqu-Spherulin codes for metazoan specific genes (Virilizer and a lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase), indicating that Aqu-Spherulin is located within the A. queenslandica genome (Figure 2b).

The deep ancestry of the Spherulin HGT event has removed evidence of Spherulin'sbacterial heritage

Phylogenetic incongruence, where evolutionary relationships are well established, can indicate a history of HGT activity [13], and is considered to be a gold standard for the demonstration of HGT ancestry [14]. We therefore performed phylogenetic analyses using a range of Spherulin sequences. All of our analyses grouped the two poriferan Spherulins together with high support, while all other prokaryotic sequences formed distantly related clades (Figure 2c). While this result is not phylogenetically incongruent (sponge Spherulin proteins would be expected to form an outgroup to all other prokaryotic Spherulin-like sequences in the absence of HGT), it does not provide evidence against HGT. It does however, provide information regarding the origins of the poriferan Spherulin gene. Because Awi- and Aqu-Spherulin form a well separated and supported clade, it is clear that an HGT event established this gene in a common ancestor of A. willeyana and A. queenslandica, and must therefore have occurred during or prior to the Triassic 265-220 MYA when these two species of sponge shared a common ancestor [9]. Because of the long branch that leads to the two poriferan genes, they must have since been evolving under pressures distinct from those of the prokaryotic Spherulin homologs.

Further evidence for the deep ancestry of the Spherulin HGT is provided by a composition analysis. Codon usage typically differs significantly between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms [15], and can therefore be used to detect cases of HGT [1618]. The level of gene expression often influences codon usage bias, with highly expressed genes typically possessing a greater bias [19]. Accordingly, we first quantified levels of Spherulin expression from three A. willeyana individuals relative to six other genes using quantitative real time PCR (qPCR). Awi-Spherulin is expressed on average 20 times higher than the previously characterized spherulite-forming gene Astrosclerin [7], and at almost 28% the level of actin (Figure 3), indicating it is a highly expressed gene. We then surveyed the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of 181 A. willeyana evolutionarily conserved genes (Additional file 3), and compared these RSCU patterns with Awi-Spherulin and Spherulin homologs from 10 prokaryotes. The high level of Awi-Spherulin expression has clearly shaped its codon usage bias such that it is now more similar to eukaryotic genes that have no HGT ancestry (Figure 3). This result supports the hypothesis that the Spherulin-HGT event took place hundreds of millions of years ago. Intriguingly, A. queenslandica does not form any calcified structures, suggesting that the functions of the two poriferan Spherulins have diverged from each other. In support of this we could not detect any Aqu-Spherulin transcripts among 66,000+ A. queenslandica ESTs derived from 3 distinct larval cDNA libraries, suggesting that Aqu-Spherulin is not expressed during development.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-11-238/MediaObjects/12862_2011_1836_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Comparative qPCR analysis and codon usage bias of A. willeyana and prokaryotic genes. The bar chart illustrates the expression levels of six A. willeyana house keeping genes quantified relative to Awi-Spherulin. Error bars are the standard error of 3 replicates derived from 3 individuals. The scatter plot is a correspondence analysis of relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of 181 A. willeyana genes. Superimposed are the RSCUs of 10 prokaryotic Spherulin homologs (grey circles) and Awi-Spherulin (red circle). Also indicated by color are the genes used in the qPCR analysis.

While there are many examples of HGT between prokaryotes [20], well established examples of HGT from prokaryotic into metazoan organisms are relatively few, with some examples revealed to be artifacts of improper analysis [13, 2123]. When they are detected, prokaryotic to eukaryotic HGTs often reflect relatively recent events because commonly employed methods to detect them (phylogenetic incongruence and composition analyses) require the maintenance of a phylogenetic signal [14]. Indeed the only method that would detect the Spherulin HGT is a phyletic pattern analysis [24, 25]. In this type of analysis the phyletic distribution of the gene of interest does not reflect the known evolutionary relationships of the species it is found in. The number of independent gene losses that must be invoked in order to account for such a distribution suggests that another explanation (HGT) should be considered. Our fortuitous identification of the HGT that established Spherulin in an ancestral poriferan genome highlights the fact that phylogenetic incongruence and composition based analyses may miss HGTs between clades of organisms that either have poor genomic resources, and/or represent HGTs that occurred in the distant past.

While the HGT we describe here may have been the result of a transfer of a sponge gene into a bacterial endobiont, this is extremely unlikely due to the phyletic distribution of Spherulin homologs throughout the Proteobacteria; Spherulin homologs are present in delta- and gamma-proteobacteria (Figure 2), and can also be detected in alpha-proteobacteria and enterobacteria. Such a distribution could only be possible if the sponge Spherulin gene had been horizontally transferred from an ancestral sponge into each of these distinct bacterial lineages independently. Alternatively, sponges would need to have been present at a time when the last common ancestor of these bacterial lineages existed, a scenario not supported by fossil or molecular data.

The Spherulin gene likely supported the evolution of the Astrosclerabiomineralization strategy

HGTs are thought to often involve the transfer of enzymes involved in metabolic processes [26, however see, 27 for an alternative view]. Given its similarity with sugar transporters, the modern and/or ancestral function of Awi-Spherulin suggests that the Spherulin-HGT falls within this category. It is tempting to speculate that Awi-Spherulin is functionally required to supply the energy necessary for the metabolically demanding process of biocalcification, however such a hypothesis awaits support by functional characterization of Awi-Spherulin. Unfortunately, in vivo manipulation of Awi-Spherulin expression or translation is currently not possible as methods to culture A. willeyana in the laboratory have not been established. Additionally there is no functional data available for any of the prokaryotic Spherulin homologs. Nonetheless, the presence of Awi-Spherulin protein in purified spherulites, and its high level of expression exclusively in spherulite forming cells is strong evidence that it plays a direct role in biocalcification in A. willeyana.

Conclusions

Sponges are well known for the abundant bacterial communities they harbor [28], a condition that significantly increases the likelihood of HGTs [14]. We provide here the first example of a HGT event into a sponge genome from a prokaryote, which serves to highlight the intimacy of the sponge-bacteria relationship. The fact that Awi-Spherulin is most likely involved in skeletogenesis suggests that this HGT event may have contributed to the evolution of A. willeyana's bodyplan. With the growing availability of metazoan genomes, and our understanding of the mechanisms that support the mobilization of genetic material, more instances of HGT into and between eukaryotic genomes will certainly be revealed. We predict that such events will often be associated with fundamental evolutionary changes to gene regulation, gene repertoire and morphological diversity.

Methods

Spherulites were isolated from snap frozen A. willeyana individuals collected around Lizard Island (Great Barrier Reef, Australia) and during the Deep DownUnder Expedition (http://www.deepdownunder.de) at various reefs on the Queensland Plateau (Australia). A prominent band at 52 kDa was excised from a standard 12% SDS-PAGE gel and sequenced by Edman degradation. From this sequence a degenerate primer (5'-TGICCDATRTCIGGDATISWRTTRTADATICCIAC-3') was designed and used to isolate a 3' fragment from a cDNA library cloned into a λ TripleX vector (Clontech). 3' and 5' RACE fragments were subsequently isolated and assembled into a putative full length mRNA. The significant BLAST hit of Awi-Spherulin against S. aurantiaca was statistically tested and confirmed using PRSS3 [29]. WMISH was performed as previously described [7] using 1,234 bp DIG labeled sense and anti-sense probes. Comparative quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a Qiagen Rotor-Gene Q machine and SYBR green chemistry. Primer sequences to all genes are available in Additional file 4. For each A. willeyana individual Spherulin was set as the calibrator. A set of Spherulin protein homologs was downloaded from GenBank and aligned using ClustalW2 with gap opening and gap extension penalties set to 3 and 1.8 respectively (see Additional file 5 for the alignment). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using MrBayes v. 3.1.2. Four runs each with 8 chains were run for 1.1 million generations at a temperature of 0.2. The first 25% of these trees were discarded as burnin. A correspondence analysis of relative synonymous codon usage was conducted using CodonW (http://sourceforge.net/projects/codonw/). A. willeyana CDSs derived from an EST collection were assembled and searched against NCBI's nr database in order to unambiguously identify correct reading frames and start and stop codons from highly conserved genes (minimum BLASTx e value 10-6). Sequences with high similarity to bacterial sequences were removed leaving a total of 181 A. willeyana CDSs (Additional file 3).

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) funding to DJJ through the CRC for Geobiology and the German Excellence Initiative, and to GW and JR (Projects Wo896/4, Wo896/6 [SPP1174 Deep Metazoan Phylogeny], Wo896/7 [Deep DownUnder]). We thank Birgit Roring for initial technical assistance. The Awi-Spherulin sequence has been deposited in GenBank under accession number AY916059.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Courant Research Centre Geobiology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen
(2)
Department of Earth- and Environmental Sciences & GeoBioCenterLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
(3)
Bavarian State Collections of Palaeontology & Geology

References

  1. Knoll AHK: Biomineralization and Evolutionary History. Rev Min Geo. 2003, 229-356.Google Scholar
  2. Morris SC: The Cambrian ''explosion'': Slow-fuse or megatonnage?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 4426-4429. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Marshall CR: Explaining the Cambrian "Explosion" of animals. Ann Rev Earth Plan Sci. 2006, 34: 355-384. 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.031504.103001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Valentine J: 2004, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press
  5. Philippe HP, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, Renard E, Houliston E, Quéinnec E, Da Silva C, Wincker P, Le Guyader H, Leys S, Jackson DJJ, Schreiber F, Erpenbeck D, Morgenstern B, Wörheide GW, Manuel M: Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol. 2009, 19: 706-712. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pick K, Hervé P, Fabian S, Erpenbeck D, Jackson DJ, Wrede P, Matthias W, Alie A, Burkhard M, Manuel M, Wörheide G: Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects non-bilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27: 1983-1987. 10.1093/molbev/msq089.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson DJ, Macis L, Reitner J, Degnan BM, Wörheide G: Sponge paleogenomics reveals an ancient role for carbonic anhydrase in skeletogenesis. Science. 2007, 316: 1893-1895. 10.1126/science.1141560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jackson DJ, Thiel V, Wörheide G: An evolutionary fast-track to biocalcification. Geobiology. 2010, 8: 191-196. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00236.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wörheide G: The reef cave dwelling ultraconservative coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana LISTER 1900 from the Indo-Pacific - Micromorphology, Ultrastructure, Biocalcification, Isotope Record, Taxonomy, Biogeography, Phylogeny. Facies. 1998, 38: 1-88. 10.1007/BF02537358.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Sheth N, Roca X, Hastings ML, Roeder T, Krainer AR, Sachidanandam R: Comprehensive splice-site analysis using comparative genomics. Nuc Acid Res. 2006, 34: 3955-3967. 10.1093/nar/gkl556.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Coolidge CJ, Seely RJ, Patton JG: Functional analysis of the polypyrimidine tract in pre-mRNA splicing. Nuc Acid Res. 1997, 25: 888-896. 10.1093/nar/25.4.888.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Newby M, Greenbaum N: Sculpting of the spliceosomal branch site recognition motif by a conserved pseudouridine. Nat Struct Biol. 2002, 9: 958-965. 10.1038/nsb873.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakashima K, Yamada L, Satou Y, Azuma J, Satoh N: The evolutionary origin of animal cellulose synthase. Dev Gen Evol. 2004, 214: 81-88. 10.1007/s00427-003-0379-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Keeling PJ, Palmer JD: Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution. Nat Rev Gen. 2008, 9: 605-618. 10.1038/nrg2386.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharp PM, Cowe E, Higgins DG, Shields DC, Wolfe KH, WRIGHT F: Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nuc Acid Res. 1988, 16: 8207-8211. 10.1093/nar/16.17.8207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Groisman EA, Saier MH, Ochman H: Horizontal transfer of a phosphatase gene as evidence for mosaic structure of the Salmonella genome. EMBO J. 1992, 11: 1309-1316.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Médigue C, Rouxel T, Vigier P, Hénaut A, Danchin A: Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation. J Mol Biol. 1991, 222: 851-856. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90575-Q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Delorme C, Godon JJ, Ehrlich SD, Renault P: Mosaic structure of large regions of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris chromosome. Microbiology. 1994, 140: 3053-3060. 10.1099/13500872-140-11-3053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ikemura T: Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985, 2: 13-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Aravind L: Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: quantification and classification. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001, 55: 709-742. 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.709.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kondrashov FA, Koonin EV, Morgunov IG, Finogenova TV, Kondrashova MN: Evolution of glyoxylate cycle enzymes in Metazoa: evidence of multiple horizontal transfer events and pseudogene formation. Biol Dir. 2006, 1: 31-10.1186/1745-6150-1-31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Syvanen M: Horizontal gene transfer: evidence and possible consequences. Annu Rev Genet. 1994, 28: 237-261. 10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.001321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Grunau C, Boissier J: No evidence for lateral gene transfer between salmonids and schistosomes. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 918-919. 10.1038/ng1110-918.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen O, Rubinstein ND, Stern A, Gophna U, Pupko T: A likelihood framework to analyse phyletic patterns. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 2008, 363: 3903-3911. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen O, Pupko T: Inference and characterization of horizontally transferred gene families using stochastic mapping. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27: 703-713. 10.1093/molbev/msp240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA: Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature. 2000, 405: 299-304. 10.1038/35012500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cohen O, Gophna U, Pupko T: The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather than function constitutes a barrier to horizontal gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28: 1481-1489. 10.1093/molbev/msq333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas T, Rusch D, Demaere MZ, Yung PY, Lewis M, Halpern A, Heidelberg KB, Egan S, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S: Functional genomic signatures of sponge bacteria reveal unique and shared features of symbiosis. ISME J. 2010, 4: 1557-1567. 10.1038/ismej.2010.74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearson WR: Searching protein sequence libraries: Comparison of the sensitivity and selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and FASTA algorithms. Genomics. 1991, 11: 635-650. 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90071-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jackson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.