Characterisation of marsupial PHLDA2 reveals eutherian specific acquisition of imprinting
© Suzuki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 19 July 2010
Accepted: 19 August 2011
Published: 19 August 2011
Genomic imprinting causes parent-of-origin specific gene expression by differential epigenetic modifications between two parental genomes. We previously reported that there is no evidence of genomic imprinting of CDKN1C in the KCNQ1 domain in the placenta of an Australian marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) whereas tammar IGF2 and H19, located adjacent to the KCNQ1 domain in eutherian mammals, are imprinted. We have now identified and characterised the marsupial orthologue of PHLDA2, another gene in the KCNQ1 domain (also known as IPL or TSSC3) that is imprinted in eutherians. In mice, Phlda2 is a dose-sensitive negative regulator of placental growth, as Cdkn1c is for embryonic growth.
Tammar PHLDA2 is highly expressed in the yolk sac placenta compared to other fetal tissues, confirming a similar expression pattern to that of mouse Phlda2. However, tammar PHLDA2 is biallelically expressed in both the fetus and yolk sac placenta, so it is not imprinted. The lack of imprinting in tammar PHLDA2 suggests that the acquisition of genomic imprinting of the KCNQ1 domain in eutherian mammals, accompanied with gene dosage reduction, occurred after the split of the therian mammals into the marsupials and eutherians.
Our results confirm the idea that acquisition of genomic imprinting in the KCNQ1 domain occurred specifically in the eutherian lineage after the divergence of marsupials, even though imprinting of the adjacent IGF2-H19 domain arose before the marsupial-eutherian split. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that genomic imprinting of the KCNQ1 domain may have contributed to the evolution of more complex placentation in the eutherian lineage by reduction of the gene dosage of negative regulators for both embryonic and placental growth.
Genomic imprinting produces monoallelic gene expression resulting from the parent-of-origin-dependent epigenetic modifications. Both DNA methylation and histone modifications are required to establish the paternal and maternal imprinting during development of the germ cells and to maintain it after fertilisation [1–4]. In humans and mice defects in some epigenetic modifiers or co-factors cause global disorders of genomic imprinting and of imprinted gene expression with early embryonic lethality, demonstrating that genomic imprinting is essential for mammalian development [5–10].
It is still unclear, however, why genomic imprinting has arisen in mammalian evolution, because adopting monoallelic gene expression means abandoning the merits of diploidy. In higher vertebrates, genomic imprinting has been found so far only in the viviparous therian mammals (eutherians and marsupials), but not in the egg-laying mammals, the monotremes [11, 12]. Since only viviparous mammals have genomic imprinting, and many imprinted genes regulate fetal and placental growth, some authors have suggested that genomic imprinting is correlated with the evolution of mammalian viviparity [13–17]. It is therefore of great interest to compare genomic imprinting between eutherians and marsupials that diverged between 130 and 148 million years ago [18–20].
Most eutherians form a chorioallantoic (allantoic) placenta that is the site of highly efficient nutritional exchange between fetus and mother, allows lengthy intra-uterine growth, and in many cases supports the growth of a precocial young. In contrast, most marsupials depend on a relatively short-lived chorio-vitelline (yolk sac) placenta. Although often ignored, a yolk sac placenta is also present and functions for varying periods of time in all eutherian mammals [21–23]. Marsupials give birth to altricial young that are at a much earlier developmental stage than the neonates of most eutherians, but have developed a complex and advanced lactation system that supports further development and growth after birth, usually in a pouch [24, 25].
Nearly 100 imprinted genes have been isolated in mice and humans. Imprinting has been studied in fourteen orthologues of these genes in marsupials but only 6 are imprinted [11, 17, 26–33]. These are IGF2, IGF2R, PEG1/MEST, PEG10, INS and H19, and are from 4 independent domains. We have previously reported that there is no evidence of genomic imprinting of CDKN1C (also known as p57 KIP2 ) in a marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) [28, 34]. CDKN1C is located in the KCNQ1 domain mapped adjacent to the IGF2-H19 domain in eutherians and marsupials. Genomic imprinting of the IGF2-H19 domain is highly conserved between eutherians and tammars . Although the imprinting regulatory mechanisms of the KCNQ1 and IGF2-H19 domains are known to be independent in mouse, the two domains are only 300 kb distant from each other and both contain several important genes that control fetal and placental growth. Therefore, to confirm whether the only gene in the domain that is not imprinted in the tammar is the CDKN1C gene, we examined the imprinting status of the orthologue of the PHLDA2 gene from the tammar wallaby KCNQ1 domain.
PHLDA2 negatively controls growth of the chorioallantoic placenta in both human and mouse. In mice, deletion of Phlda2 causes placental overgrowth . In contrast, biallelic expression of Phlda2, due to loss of imprinting, contributes to placental growth retardation and results in conceptuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) . Furthermore, a single extra dose of Phlda2 has serious consequences for placental development, driving the loss of the junctional zone and reducing the amount of stored glycogen . In humans, whilst there is silencing of PHLDA2 in complete hydatidiform moles , there is upregulation in placentae of fetuses with IUGR [39, 40]; consistent with the results of genetic experiments in mice. Thus, the importance of gene dosage of PHLDA2 in eutherian placentation has been demonstrated by a number of studies. In this study, we characterise the orthologue of PHLDA2 in a marsupial, the tammar wallaby and examine its imprinting status in the chorio-vitelline placenta to clarify its possible contribution for the evolution of chorioallantoic placenta in the eutherian linage by dosage reduction consequent to acquisition of genomic imprinting.
Characterisation of tammar PHLDA2
Tissue specific expression pattern of tammar PHLDA2
Tammar PHLDA2 protein distribution in the yolk sac placenta
Allelic expression analysis of tammar PHLDA2
In this study, we identified and characterised the marsupial orthologue of PHLDA2. The amino acid sequence of tammar PHLDA2 shared highest conservation within the PH domain and lower conservation in the flanking sequences of both terminals, suggesting the essential role in the PH domain in contrast to the flanking regions, consistent with previous reports . There was a similar high conservation of the amino acid sequences within the PH domain in the platypus, tammar and human PHLDA2, suggesting that this domain has a significant role with a similar function in marsupials and monotremes. The high level of mRNA expression in the trilaminar yolk sac and the protein localisation to the cytoplasm of trophoblast cells suggest that PHLDA2 functions in the tammar yolk sac placenta during pregnancy. However, although murine Phlda2 has the highest expression in the yolk sac , in mice with a disrupted Phlda2 gene the only abnormalities reported are in the chorioallantoic placenta . Therefore, an ancestral role for PHLDA2 in the yolk sac might have been transferred to the chorioallantoic placenta during the evolution of the mouse.
There was no evidence of genomic imprinting of tammar PHLDA2 in this study. The mouse Kcnq1 domain forms a large imprinted gene cluster including Phlda2, Slc22a18, Cdkn1c, Kcnq1, Ascl2 (also known as Mash2) and some placenta-specific imprinted genes. However, we know now that at least two genes, CDKN1C and PHLDA2 that are involved in embryonic and placental growth in eutherians, are not imprinted in this marsupial . Considering that both genes are located to the middle of the domain and that all the imprinted genes in this domain are co-ordinately regulated by a single imprinting centre in the mouse, our data strongly suggests that the whole KCNQ1 domain lacks genomic imprinting in marsupials. Interestingly, the IGF2-H19 imprinted domain, located adjacent to the KCNQ1 domain shares a highly conserved imprinting regulatory mechanism complete with a differentially methylated region and associated miRNA between eutherians and marsupials . This study thus confirms that the origin of imprinting of the KCNQ1 domain evolved in the eutherian lineage after the divergence of marsupials, whereas that of the IGF2-H19 domain appeared before the marsupial-eutherian split, regardless of the close proximity of these two domains .
In the Kcnq1 domain of mice, while Cdkn1c is a negative regulator for embryonic growth , Phlda2 negatively controls placental growth [35–37] and acts as a true rheostat for placental growth . Recently, using a single copy transgenic mouse, Tunster et al., (2010) reported that Phlda2 regulates extraembryonic energy stores. Two-fold over-expression of Phlda2 caused a 60% loss of the spongiotrophoblast layer with a 25-35% reduction of glycogen storage. Since acquisition of genomic imprinting of PHLDA2 in the KCNQ1 domain by silencing of the paternal allele was accompanied by gene dosage reduction in eutherians, this might have affected the evolution of placental structure and/or energy stores. In laboratory mice that have two active copies of Phlda2 with the second copy provided by the BAC transgene, there was only a slight progressive slowing of embryonic growth . However, greater reduction of fetal growth may have been seen if the mice had had restricted food intake, as is often the case in the wild, so that limited nutrition would need to be partitioned between mother and fetuses. In this situation, reduced expression of PHLDA2 could have had a selective advantage through greater placental development. We hypothesise that acquisition of imprinting in the KCNQ1 domain in the ancestral line that gave rise to the eutherian mammals may have allowed increased the placental growth and extended gestation that characterises this group of mammals.
Animals and tissue collection
Tammar wallabies of Kangaroo Island origin were maintained in our breeding colony in grassy, outdoor enclosures. Lucerne cubes, grass and water were provided ad libitum and supplemented with fresh vegetables. Fetuses and yolk sac placenta tissue were collected between days 21 and 26 of the 26.5 days gestation as previously described [24, 42]. Experimental procedures conformed to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2004) guidelines and were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committees of the University of Melbourne.
Amplification of tammar PHLDA2 sequence
The following primer pair for the amplification of the 272 bp tammar PHLDA2 fragment was designed from the highly conserved region in the multi-species sequence alignment:
272 forward 5'-GCGAGGGCGAGCTGGAGAAGCG-3'
272 reverse 5'-GATGGCCGCGTTCCAGCAGCTCT-3'
Thirty five cycles of PCR amplification were carried out in 25 μl total volume with 5-10 ng tammar cDNA from the yolk sac placenta using 0.5 U "TaKaRa Ex Taq Hot Start Version" (TaKaRa), 10 pmol each primers and 5 nmol each dNTP mixture under the following cycle conditions: 96°C × 15 s, 60°C × 30 s and 72°C × 30 s. PCR product was purified by "ExoSAP-IT" (GE) before sequencing. The 3' terminal of PHLDA2 mRNA was determined by "3' RACE System for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends" (Invitrogen) using the same forward primer described above as the gene specific primer. The intronic sequence was amplified by genomic PCR under the same conditions described above with 25 ng genomic DNA and the following primer pair:
Exon1 forward 5'-CGACTTCCGCTGCCCCGACG-3'
Exon2 reverse 5'-AAGACAAGGTCCCCATCGAG-3'
Calculation of the amino acid sequence homology
The percentage homology of the amino acid sequence in the PH domain between tammar and multiple species was calculated using the homology search program in the "GENETYX-MAC" software.
Quantification of tammar PHLDA2 mRNA was performed using "Mx3000P QPCR System" (Agilent Technologies) with "Brilliant II SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix" (Agilent Technologies) under the following cycle conditions: 95°C × 15 s, 60°C × 30 s, 72°C × 30 s. The following primer pairs were used for the amplifications of PHLDA2 and ACTB as control:
PHLDA2 forward 5'-AGCCTCTTTCAGCTGTGGAA-3'
PHLDA2 reverse 5'-AAAATAGACGTGTTTGGCCG-3'
ACTB forward 5'-TTGCTGACAGGATGCAGAAG-3'
ACTB reverse 5'-AAAGCCATGCCAATCTCATC-3'
Total RNA was extracted from the fresh frozen fetal tissues and yolk sac placentas using "TRI Reagent Solution" (Applied Biosystems) and reverse transcribed using "SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System" (Invitrogen) with Oligo(dT) primer.
Tissue sections (8 μm) were treated with 5% hydrogen peroxide in dH2O for 15 min to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Slides were blocked in 10% normal goat serum in 0.1% BSA/TBS. Mouse monoclonal antibody raised against a partial recombinant human PHLDA2 (ABNOVA, H00007262-M01) was applied to sections at a 1:100 dilution at 4°C overnight. Antibody binding was detected with goat anti-mouse biotinylated secondary antibody (Dako) and amplified using the "Strept ABC Complex/HRP" (Dako). Antibody localisation was visualised using "Liquid DAB+ Substrate-Chromogen System" (Dako). Tissues were counterstained with haematoxylin.
Allelic expression analysis
RNA was isolated using the "ISOGEN" (Nippongene). Extracted RNA was then treated with DNase (RT grade; Nippongene) at room temperature for 1 hr. Reverse transcription was performed using "SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System" (Invitrogen) with Oligo(dT) primer. RT-PCR amplifications were carried out at the same conditions as described in the previous section for the fetus #1 and #2, and 30 cycles with 68°C of annealing temperature for the fetus #3 and the pouch young #1, using following primer pair:
Exon1 forward 5'-CGACTTCCGCTGCCCCGACG-3'
Intron reverse 5'-TAGAGACTCCAGGAGCTGGC-3'
Three percent agarose gels were used for the electrophoresis. For amplification of IGF2, PCR conditions were the same in the previous section except the annealing temperature was 65°C and the primer pair:
Intron forward 5'-GACTCCACTTTCTTCCTTCCCTT-3'
Exon reverse 5'-AAAGCATGGCAGCCCACACT-3'
PCR products were purified by "ExoSAP-IT" (GE) before sequencing.
Animals were held in our research colony under permits 1000450 and 10001910 from the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment. We thank Scott Brownlees, Kerry Martin and members of the wallaby research group for assistance in animal husbandry and handling. This work was supported by grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to SS and FI, and by JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad to SS, and by an Australian Research Council Federation Fellowship to MBR.
- Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R: Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature. 1993, 366 (6453): 362-365. 10.1038/366362a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mager J, Montgomery ND, de Villena FP, Magnuson T: Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed. Nat Genet. 2003, 33 (4): 502-507. 10.1038/ng1125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneda M, Okano M, Hata K, Sado T, Tsujimoto N, Li E, Sasaki H: Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature. 2004, 429 (6994): 900-903. 10.1038/nature02633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciccone DN, Su H, Hevi S, Gay F, Lei H, Bajko J, Xu G, Li E, Chen T: KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature. 2009, 461 (7262): 415-418. 10.1038/nature08315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bourc'his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, Bollman B, Bestor TH: Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science. 2001, 294 (5551): 2536-2539. 10.1126/science.1065848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E: Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development. 2002, 129 (8): 1983-1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Judson H, Hayward BE, Sheridan E, Bonthron DT: A global disorder of imprinting in the human female germ line. Nature. 2002, 416 (6880): 539-542. 10.1038/416539a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murdoch S, Djuric U, Mazhar B, Seoud M, Khan R, Kuick R, Bagga R, Kircheisen R, Ao A, Ratti B, Hanash S, Rouleau GA, Slim R: Mutations in NALP7 cause recurrent hydatidiform moles and reproductive wastage in humans. Nat Genet. 2006, 38 (3): 300-302. 10.1038/ng1740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Ito M, Zhou F, Youngson N, Zuo X, Leder P, Ferguson-Smith AC: A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev Cell. 2008, 15 (4): 547-557. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.014.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mackay DJ, Callaway JL, Marks SM, White HE, Acerini CL, Boonen SE, Dayanikli P, Firth HV, Goodship JA, Haemers AP, Hahnemann JM, Kordonouri O, Masoud AF, Oestergaard E, Storr J, Ellard S, Hattersley AT, Robinson DO, Temple IK: Hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci in individuals with transient neonatal diabetes is associated with mutations in ZFP57. Nat Genet. 2008, 40 (8): 949-951. 10.1038/ng.187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pask AJ, Papenfuss AT, Ager EI, McColl KA, Speed TP, Renfree MB: Analysis of the platypus genome suggests a transposon origin for mammalian imprinting. Genome Biol. 2009, 10 (1): R1-10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB, Papenfuss AT, Shaw G, Pask AJ: Eggs, embryos and the evolution of imprinting: insights from the platypus genome. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2009, 21 (8): 935-942. 10.1071/RD09092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko-Ishino T, Kohda T, Ishino F: The regulation and biological significance of genomic imprinting in mammals. J Biochem. 2003, 133 (6): 699-711. 10.1093/jb/mvg090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reik W, Lewis A: Co-evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6 (5): 403-410. 10.1038/nrg1602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cattanach BM, Beechey CV, Peters J: Interactions between imprinting effects: summary and review. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006, 113 (1-4): 17-23. 10.1159/000090810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB, Ager EI, Shaw G, Pask AJ: Genomic imprinting in marsupial placentation. Reproduction. 2008, 136 (5): 523-531. 10.1530/REP-08-0264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB, Hore TA, Shaw G, Graves JA, Pask AJ: Evolution of genomic imprinting: insights from marsupials and monotremes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009, 10: 241-262. 10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo Z-X, Ji Q, Wible JR, Yuan C-X: An Early Cretaceous Tribosphenic Mammal and Metatherian Evolution. Science. 2003, 302 (5652): 1934-1940. 10.1126/science.1090718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo Z-X: Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution. Nature. 2007, 450 (7172): 1011-1019. 10.1038/nature06277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bininda-Emonds OR, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RD, Beck RM, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A: The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature. 2007, 446 (7135): 507-512. 10.1038/nature05634.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freyer C, Zeller U, Renfree MB: The marsupial placenta: a phylogenetic analysis. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2003, 299 (1): 59-77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB: The composition of fetal fluids of the marsupial Macropus eugenii. Dev Biol. 1973, 33 (1): 62-79. 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90165-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freyer C, Renfree MB: The mammalian yolk sac placenta. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2009, 312 (6): 545-554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tyndale-Biscoe CH, Renfree MB: Reproductive Physiology of Marsupials. 1987, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB: Life in the pouch: womb with a view. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006, 18 (7): 721-734. 10.1071/RD06072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Killian JK, Byrd JC, Jirtle JV, Munday BL, Stoskopf MK, MacDonald RG, Jirtle RL: M6P/IGF2R imprinting evolution in mammals. Mol Cell. 2000, 5 (4): 707-716. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80249-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill MJ, Ingram RS, Vrana PB, Tilghman SM: Allelic expression of IGF2 in marsupials and birds. Dev Genes Evol. 2000, 210 (1): 18-20. 10.1007/PL00008182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki S, Renfree MB, Pask AJ, Shaw G, Kobayashi S, Kohda T, Kaneko-Ishino T, Ishino F: Genomic imprinting of IGF2, p57(KIP2) and PEG1/MEST in a marsupial, the tammar wallaby. Mech Dev. 2005, 122 (2): 213-222. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.10.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rapkins RW, Hore T, Smithwick M, Ager E, Pask AJ, Renfree MB, Kohn M, Hameister H, Nicholls RD, Deakin JE, Graves JA: Recent assembly of an imprinted domain from non-imprinted components. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2 (10): e182-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ager E, Suzuki S, Pask A, Shaw G, Ishino F, Renfree MB: Insulin is imprinted in the placenta of the marsupial, Macropus eugenii. Dev Biol. 2007, 309 (2): 317-328. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki S, Ono R, Narita T, Pask AJ, Shaw G, Wang C, Kohda T, Alsop AE, Marshall Graves JA, Kohara Y, Ishino F, Renfree MB, Kaneko-Ishino T: Retrotransposon silencing by DNA methylation can drive mammalian genomic imprinting. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (4): e55-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030055.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Edwards CA, Mungall AJ, Matthews L, Ryder E, Gray DJ, Pask AJ, Shaw G, Graves JA, Rogers J, the SAVOIR Consortium, Dunham I, Renfree MB, Ferguson-Smith AC: The evolution of the DLK1-DIO3 imprinted domain in mammals. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6 (6): e135-10.1371/journal.pbio.0060135.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Smits G, Mungall AJ, Griffiths-Jones S, Smith P, Beury D, Matthews L, Rogers J, Pask AJ, Shaw G, VandeBerg JL, McCarrey JR, the SAVOIR Consortium, Renfree MB, Reik W, Dunham I: Conservation of the H19 noncoding RNA and H19-IGF2 imprinting mechanism in therians. Nat Genet. 2008, 40 (8): 971-976. 10.1038/ng.168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ager EI, Pask AJ, Gehring HM, Shaw G, Renfree MB: Evolution of the CDKN1C-KCNQ1 imprinted domain. BMC Evol Biol. 2008, 8: 163-10.1186/1471-2148-8-163.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Frank D, Fortino W, Clark L, Musalo R, Wang W, Saxena A, Li CM, Reik W, Ludwig T, Tycko B: Placental overgrowth in mice lacking the imprinted gene Ipl. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (11): 7490-7495. 10.1073/pnas.122039999.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Salas M, John R, Saxena A, Barton S, Frank D, Fitzpatrick G, Higgins MJ, Tycko B: Placental growth retardation due to loss of imprinting of Phlda2. Mech Dev. 2004, 121 (10): 1199-1210. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.05.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tunster SJ, Tycko B, John RM: The imprinted Phlda2 gene regulates extraembryonic energy stores. Mol Cell Biol. 2010, 30 (1): 295-306. 10.1128/MCB.00662-09.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saxena A, Frank D, Panichkul P, Van den Veyver IB, Tycko B, Thaker H: The product of the imprinted gene IPL marks human villous cytotrophoblast and is lost in complete hydatidiform mole. Placenta. 2003, 24 (8-9): 835-842. 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00130-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMinn J, Wei M, Schupf N, Cusmai J, Johnson EB, Smith AC, Weksberg R, Thaker HM, Tycko B: Unbalanced placental expression of imprinted genes in human intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta. 2006, 27 (6-7): 540-549. 10.1016/j.placenta.2005.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diplas AI, Lambertini L, Lee MJ, Sperling R, Lee YL, Wetmur J, Chen J: Differential expression of imprinted genes in normal and IUGR human placentas. Epigenetics. 2009, 4 (4): 235-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saxena A, Morozov P, Frank D, Musalo R, Lemmon MA, Skolnik EY, Tycko B: Phosphoinositide binding by the pleckstrin homology domains of Ipl and Tih1. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (51): 49935-49944. 10.1074/jbc.M206497200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB: Marsupials: Placental Mammals with a Difference. Placenta. 2010, 31 (Supplement 1): S21-S26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renfree MB: Implantation and placentation. Reproduction in Mammals. Edited by: Austin CR, Short RV. 1982, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2: 26-69. SecondGoogle Scholar
- Qian N, Frank D, O'Keefe D, Dao D, Zhao L, Yuan L, Wang Q, Keating M, Walsh C, Tycko B: The IPL gene on chromosome 11p15.5 is imprinted in humans and mice and is similar to TDAG51, implicated in Fas expression and apoptosis. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6 (12): 2021-2029. 10.1093/hmg/6.12.2021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrews SC, Wood MD, Tunster SJ, Barton SC, Surani MA, John RM: Cdkn1c (p57Kip2) is the major regulator of embryonic growth within its imprinted domain on mouse distal chromosome 7. BMC Dev Biol. 2007, 7: 53-10.1186/1471-213X-7-53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.