RT-qPCR reveals opsin gene upregulation associated with age and sex in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) - a species with color-based sexual selection and 11 visual-opsin genes
© Laver and Taylor; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 2 November 2010
Accepted: 29 March 2011
Published: 29 March 2011
PCR-based surveys have shown that guppies (Poecilia reticulata) have an unusually large visual-opsin gene repertoire. This has led to speculation that opsin duplication and divergence has enhanced the evolution of elaborate male coloration because it improves spectral sensitivity and/or discrimination in females. However, this conjecture on evolutionary connections between opsin repertoire, vision, mate choice, and male coloration was generated with little data on gene expression. Here, we used RT-qPCR to survey visual-opsin gene expression in the eyes of males, females, and juveniles in order to further understand color-based sexual selection from the perspective of the visual system.
Juvenile and adult (male and female) guppies express 10 visual opsins at varying levels in the eye. Two opsin genes in juveniles, SWS2B and RH2-2, accounted for >85% of all visual-opsin transcripts in the eye, excluding RH1. This relative abundance (RA) value dropped to about 65% in adults, as LWS-A180 expression increased from approximately 3% to 20% RA. The juvenile-to-female transition also showed LWS-S180 upregulation from about 1.5% to 7% RA. Finally, we found that expression in guppies' SWS2-LWS gene cluster is negatively correlated with distance from a candidate locus control region (LCR).
Selective pressures influencing visual-opsin gene expression appear to differ among age and sex. LWS upregulation in females is implicated in augmenting spectral discrimination of male coloration and courtship displays. In males, enhanced discrimination of carotenoid-rich food and possibly rival males are strong candidate selective pressures driving LWS upregulation. These developmental changes in expression suggest that adults possess better wavelength discrimination than juveniles. Opsin expression within the SWS2-LWS gene cluster appears to be regulated, in part, by a common LCR. Finally, by comparing our RT-qPCR data to MSP data, we were able to propose the first opsin-to-λmax assignments for all photoreceptor types in the cone mosaic.
For the better part of a century, guppies (Poecilia reticulata) have served as a model organism for the study of male coloration, courtship displays, female mate-choice, and visual-pigment evolution [1–8]. Within these, and in other aspects of guppy life-history, a large number of sex- and population-specific morphological and behavioral characteristics have been described [3, 9–14], with the most salient of this variation being guppies' pronounced sexual dimorphism. For example, the Cumaná guppy studied here, from a human perspective, exhibits polymorphic black, red, orange, yellow, and iridescent color patterns in males, while females are green, yellow, and iridescent. In areas of low-predation, such as that of Cumaná guppies, male coloration increases and serves as an indicator of fitness to females, while under high predation pressure this coloration is subdued [15, 16]. Thus, conspicuous male coloration is a trade-off as it attracts both females and predators . These observations suggest that color vision, at least in females, plays an important role in mate choice and, therefore, in the evolution of variation in male coloration.
Vision is mediated by membrane-bound photoreceptors encoded by opsin genes. The opsin family has been broadly sorted into three subfamilies: photoisomerases, rhabdomeric opsins (r-opsins), and ciliary opsins (c-opsins) (reviewed by Lamb et al. [17, 18]). Although r-opsins are used for vision in protostomes the term 'visual opsin' has been used to describe the c-opsins expressed in vertebrate rods and cones. Visual opsins have been categorized into five spectral classes: LWS, SWS1, SWS2, RH2, and RH1 . The first four of these opsin classes facilitate cone-based photopic (bright light) vision and color perception, while RH1, the most recently evolved of the five spectral classes [20, 21], facilitates rod-based scotopic (low light) vision. Visual-opsin gene loss and duplication and divergence have generated extensive repertoire variation among vertebrates that, in many cases, correlates to spectral environment (see reviews [22, 23]).
Remarkably, the Cumaná guppy genome encodes at least 11 visual opsins. This repertoire includes one RH1 gene, three short wavelength-sensitive genes (SWS1, SWS2A, and SWS2B), two middle wavelength-sensitive genes (RH2-1 and RH2-2), and four long wavelength-sensitive (LWS) genes: A180, P180, S180, and S180r. The eleventh gene is a hybrid locus (A180 with a P180 3' end) that has not been detected in other guppy populations [6–8, 24]. The observation that amino acid substitutions have occurred at key sites, even among recent duplicates (e.g., A180 and S180)  suggests that much, if not all, of this diversity is a product of selection.
Long before the guppy opsin gene repertoire was characterized, microspectrophotometry (MSP) data indicated that guppies had several distinct classes of retinal photoreceptor cells (hereafter referred to as, 'photoreceptors'). These include ultraviolet (UV), short- and middle-wavelength sensitive cones with maximal absorption (λmax) at 359/389, 410, and 465 nm, respectively, as well as one or more of three LWS cones with λmax values clustering at 533, 543, and 572 nm. Rod λmax was also characterized at about 503 nm [25–27]. Collectively, these findings implicate photoreceptor-level expression of at least six of the 11 visual-opsin genes found in guppies, though it has not been possible, until now, to associate each λmax to a specific opsin and photoreceptor morphology (or 'type').
In several fish species a large visual-opsin gene repertoire appears to play an important role in the tuning of vision for particular environments (see reviews [28, 29]). While these examples of vision tuning deal with wavelength sensitivity, evidence of increased color discrimination by means of an expanded opsin gene repertoire has recently been shown in non-teleost species. Transgenic mice expressing three instead of two LWS opsins exhibited enhanced discrimination of red and orange wavelengths of light . Similarly, Mancuso et al.  demonstrated that it was possible to treat adult squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) congenital red-green color blindness using LWS-recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) gene therapy. The intriguing implication of these studies is that retinal circuitry and higher order neuronal processes are either sufficient or adapt to mediate this augmentation to congenital vision. Thus, the potential for guppies to have increased color sensitivity and/or discrimination seemingly hinges on if, and to what extent, these 'extra opsins' are expressed in the retina.
Although all 10 non-hybrid visual opsins are expressed at the mRNA level in Cumaná guppy eyes [8, 24], little is known about the relative abundance of each opsin. Ward et al.  indicated that LWS expression is predominated (>97%) by A180 transcripts; however, only three adult fish were surveyed. Here we used reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to characterize expression levels of all non-hybrid visual opsins. We surveyed males, females, and juveniles in order to test the hypothesis that sexual selection influences color vision in guppies. As adults, males exhibit elaborate red, orange, and yellow colorations that strongly influence female mate choice [2–4, 8, 32–34]. Since embryos and juveniles do not show these characteristic colors, and by definition are not sexually active, we predicted that if opsin gene expression plays a role in color-based sexual selection, then LWS upregulation will coincide with sexual maturity. Finally, the recent discovery that SWS2 and LWS occur in a tandem array in Cumaná guppies  allowed us to test the hypothesis that distance from a candidate LCR influences opsin expression in guppies, as is the case for human LWS/MWS [36, 37] and zebrafish (Danio rerio) RH2s .
Animal care and treatment
Guppy housing and rearing
Guppy (n-value) life cycle stage when
sequestered in light-dark cycle
Number of offspring
Age at time of
Total RNA [ng/μL] b and purity (A260/280)
from pooled c left eyes
Total RNA [ng/μL] and purity (A260/280)
from pooled right eyes
Gravid female (1)
Gravid female (1)
Gravid female (1)
Extraction of total RNA and cDNA synthesis
Following light-dark cycle adaptation period (a minimum of 2 weeks for adults) guppies were euthanized in 1 g/L tricaine methanesulphonate, MS222, (Sigma®) at 13:00 hours of the light phase. Sampling time was based on cichlid and zebrafish studies indicating that the highest level of cone opsin expression coincides with the end of the photopic day [39, 40]. Eyes from 45 individuals were excised and pooled according to age, sex, and left or right eyes (see primary survey, Table 1), with each pool individually placed into 1.0 mL PureZOL™ (Bio-Rad®) containing a 3 mm tungsten carbide bead. Extraction of left and right eyes were alternated among individuals to eliminate RNA degradation bias that might have occurred between specimen death and eye immersion in PureZOL™ (a total of 1 minute for the first eye, and 2 minutes for the second eye). To assess variability between broods of the same age, one-month-old juveniles from two females were sampled (primary survey, Table 1). Four additional groups of five individuals, for each sex, had both eyes pooled to expand the A180 and S180 expression dataset (see secondary survey, Table 1).
Eyes immersed in PurZOL™ solution (plus carbide bead), were homogenize in a Retsch® MM301 Mixer Mill at 20 Hz for 6 minutes. Total RNA was extracted using the Aurum™ Total RNA Fatty and Fibrous Tissue (BioRad®), which included a 25 minute DNase I incubation. Concentration and purity (A260/A280) of total RNA was measured using a ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop®) (Table 1). iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kits (Bio-Rad®), which incorporates random hexameric and oligo-dT primers to yield a cDNA representation of total RNA at time of sampling, were used to generate single-stranded cDNA from 2000 ng total RNA per 40 μL reaction. This yielded total cDNA concentrations of 50 ng/μL for each sample, assuming close to 100% conversion. cDNA samples were diluted 50-fold for subsequent RT-qPCR and 10-fold for subsequent reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; all cDNA was stored at -20°C.
Oligonucleotide primers and sequences
Visual opsin genea, reference geneb,
Primer Sequence (5'→3')
Amplicon size (bp) and GenBank
Primers designed against GenBank accession
number or reference
LWS A180 a
LWS P180 a
LWS S180 a
LWS S180r a
COI b *
MCS (141) + Insert
Development of plasmid standards
Preliminary qPCR assays, using the methods described below, revealed amplification efficiencies (Eff = 10(-1/slope) - 1) of several opsins to be significantly different from one another (SD >13%) (see Additional file 3), indicating that relative quantification among opsins would not be acceptable. Therefore, Effs were determined by standard curves run in parallel with cDNA samples for each gene during RT-qPCR (see below). To make these plasmid standards, RT-PCR products were generated using opsin- and reference-gene specific primers (Table 2), with subsequent amplicons purified using QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit, A-tailed with Native Taq Polymerase (Invitrogen®), and cloned using the pGEM®-T Easy Vector System II kit (Promega®). Verification of clone insert size was determined by plasmid-PCR, using SP6 and T7 multi-cloning site (MCS) primers (Promega®) (Table 1), followed by sequencing (CBR or Macrogen, USA). Plasmids (with opsin or reference gene inserts) were serial diluted to 107, 106, 105, 104, and 103 copies per 16.3 μL reaction for generation of standard curves by RT-qPCR (detailed below).
Plasmid standard curve values
Plasmid::gene of interest
Amplification Efficiency (%)
r-squared values (Rsq)
Y = -4.976*Log(X) + 56.76
Y = -4.539*Log(X) + 51.69
Y = -3.494*Log(X) + 43.42
Y = -3.998*Log(X) + 51.22
Y = -4.141*Log(X) + 52.61
Y = -3.846*Log(X) + 41.51
Y = -3.881*Log(X) + 43.15
Y = -4.142*Log(X) + 49.30
Y = -3.378*Log(X) + 38.49
Y = -4.036*Log(X) + 39.05
Y = -3.828*Log(X) + 41.05
Y = -3.402*Log(X) + 38.67
Y = -3.651*Log(X) + 39.80
Y = -4.132*Log(X) + 47.75
Y = -3.861*Log(X) + 42.84
Y = -4.217*Log(X) + 50.74
Y = -3.774*Log(X) + 43.27
Y = -4.184*Log(X) + 51.10
The recent discovery that Cumaná guppies (P. reticulata) express 10 of their 11 visual-opsin genes in adult eyes [6, 8, 24], suggested that this species possesses enhanced wavelength sensitivity and/or discrimination. Characterization of this repertoire was particularly exciting given the wealth of data on color-based sexual selection in this species. However, RT-qPCR data reported here indicates that the guppy eye might not be the irradiance detector we had initially envisioned.
Two to four visual opsins predominate in guppy eyes
Our RT-qPCR analysis of Cumaná guppy eyes revealed that all 10 non-hybrid visual-opsin genes are expressed in juveniles and adults (males and females) (Figure 1). Curiously, only two opsin genes in juveniles (SWS2B and RH2-2), three in males (SWS2B, RH2-2, and A180), and four in females (SWS2B, RH2-2, A180, and S180), produced the majority of visual opsin transcripts in the eye, excluding RH1 (Figure 2A). At first, these surprising results suggest that juveniles, males, and females are at least dichromatic, trichromatic, and tetrachromatic, respectively. However, any extrapolations from opsin expression to color vision require data on the location of opsins in the guppy retina, not just their quantity. To shed light on this, we compared our RT-qPCR data to MSP data on guppy cone cells. This allowed us to assign visual opsins to λmax peaks. As λmax peaks are known for specific cone types, and for specific regions of the retina, we were able to assign opsins to different cone types and areas of the retina.
Guppy visual-opsin expression in rods and cones
SWS2 and RH2 assignments
Our expression data led us to assign the 408 and 465 nm peaks to SWS2B and RH2-2, respectively. This was due to SWS2B and RH2-2 transcripts exhibiting a combined RA of >65% among all guppies assayed, whereas SWS2A and RH2-1 transcripts showed ~5% RA (Figure 3B-box). It is, therefore, likely (assuming opsin expression is proportional to cone cell number) that the above MSP studies detected more of the highly expressed pigments than their less expressed counterparts. These data, combined with the observation that MSP consistently found 464-472 nm peaks for accessory double-cones (DCs) in multiple populations (Figure 3A), led us to attribute the majority of RH2 and SWS2 expression in juvenile and adult guppy eyes to RH2-2 in accessory DCs and SWS2B in dorsal long single-cones (LCs) (Figure 3B-C). This conclusion, as well as others made below, is contingent on opsin-class expression in photoreceptor types being similar between our Venezuelan population (Cumaná) and that of the above MSP studies done on Trinidadian populations (Aripo, Paria, and Quinam). This is probable given that the λmax values for photoreceptors types are consistent among all populations sampled to date, with variation limited to the long wavelength-sensitive region (Figure 3A).
At this point, it is important to note that, although dorsal-ventral differences in opsin expression have not been investigated in Cumaná guppies, dorsal-ventral differences in cone pigment distribution (Figure 3C) were found in another population via MSP . Furthermore, MSP data showing that accessory DCs invariably contain 468 nm pigments (Figure 3A) , combined with morphological studies (reported and reviewed by Kunz and Wise ) showing that the ventral retina is largely devoid of ellipsosomes (present only in accessory DCs [46, 47]), supports the above MSP finding and our proposal that Cumaná guppies exhibit similar dorsal-ventral expression. Finally, the spectral selective-pressures thought to be responsible for this pattern (discussed later) are present in Cumaná guppy habitats.
Variation in λmax of LWS cones is present among adult guppy individuals in both Trinidadian and Venezuelan populations. For three Trinidadian populations, one or more peak absorption (clustered around 533, 543, or 572 nm) is exhibited (Figure 3A) . However, as these data represent 15 individuals from each of the three populations (Aripo, Paria, and Quinam) grouped together during analysis, it is unclear if variation in λmax is attributed to individual and/or population-level differences. Although, individual variation was, indeed, observed for the Paria population in an earlier study . Similarly, for Venezuelan guppies, recent MSP data indicate that individuals of at least one population (Cumaná) also contain one or more of three LWS cones. These cones have λmax values of about 525, 540, and 560 nm, with four out of the seven individuals assayed containing only 540 nm cones . Given this, and that we report data from only our highly inbred Cumaná lab-population, it stands to reason that we should see limited variability in LWS opsin expression - a hypothesis that is supported by A180 transcripts clearly predominating in our lab population (Figure 2A), as was indicated in preliminary work .
Previously, guppy A180-to-λmax assignments have been based on values from other species  and on the -7 nm shift attributed to the S180A substitution . These data led Ward et al.  to assign A180's λmax to 553 nm. However, with both A180 transcription and 540 nm LWS cones predominating in Cumaná guppies, we can now attribute these cones to A180 expression. Further support for this assignment comes from a relative of the guppy, the green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri), that expresses P180, S180, and S180r, but lacks A180 . The fact that this species does not exhibit an absorption peak near 540 nm  supports our assignment of A180 being responsible for the 540/543 nm peak found in guppies. Within a cone mosaic unit, LWS ventral twin-DCs and ventral LCs have been shown to have the same λmax values, indicating expression of the same pigment(s) (Figure 3C) [44, 50, 51]. In light of these data, the principle member of DCs, LWS ventral twin-DCs (the predominant type of DC in the ventral retina of guppies [44, 50, 51]), and ventral LCs, all appear to express A180 in Cumaná guppies (Figure 3B-C).
MSP showed no significant difference between male and female λmax frequencies for LWS cones among guppies from the three different Trinidadian populations mentioned above . Although our Venezuelan population showed a significant difference between male and female A180 expression, ~15% versus 20% RA, respectively (Figure 2A-C), this difference might not have been recognized by MSP or may not be present in Trinidadian populations. We also detected a significant increase in female S180 expression in our population (Figure 2C). Trinidadian populations exhibit relatively few 560 nm peaks , which we assign to S180 (detailed below), indicating that S180 expression appears to differ among populations.
S180 and S180r - the most red-shifted LWS opsins in guppies - were once both predicted to have λmax values of approximately 560 nm [7, 8]. However, the spectral-tuning effects of the amino acid differences between these two opsins have not been determined . Since female Cumaná guppies express 10 times more S180 transcripts than that of S180r (Figure 3B-box), and that 560 nm cones are the only cones more red-shifted than A180 cones in this population , we attribute these 560 nm cones to S180 expression. This assignment is consistent with the two S180 (SHYTA five-site haplotype) opsins found in medaka (Oryzias latipes) having a λmax of 561 and 562 nm .
Trinidadian guppy populations exhibit LWS cones with λmax values at about 572 nm . Given S180r's low transcription and lack of 572 nm cones in our Venezuelan guppy population, as well as S180r's amino acid differences from S180, we attribute the 572 nm cones in Trinidadian populations to S180r expression. This assignment is consistent with at least one of bluefin killifish's (Lucania goodei) two LWS opsins being S180r , as both LWS-A and LWS-B seem to absorb at 573 nm . Green swordtail also exhibits a similar peak (568 nm), though this is thought to be due to S180 subtypes (S180-1 and/or S180-2) ; however, since quantitative expression data is currently unavailable for this species, S180r can not be ruled out.
The above opsin-to-λmax assignments for A180, S180, and S180r are also consistent with the predicted λmax of P180 being the most blue-shifted LWS opsin at 512 nm (531 nm minus the 19 nm blue-shift of the S180P substitution [8, 54]). Since rods are the only retinal photoreceptor near P180's predicted λmax (512 nm) for both Trinidadian and Venezuelan guppy populations (Figure 3A), and that we detected <1% RA for P180, it seems that if visual relevancy is exhibited at this expression level in Cumaná guppies, then it may be due to a small number of P180 cones missed by MSP scans or, more likely, coexpression with another opsin that may serve to broaden the spectral absorption range of the cell.
Given our P180, A180, S180, and S180r λmax assignments of 512, 540, 560, and 572 nm, respectively, which LWS opsin is responsible for the ~525-533 nm peak found in multiple guppy populations [25, 26]? Hofmann and Carleton  dissented from the previously held notion that the ~525 nm peak was attributed to a LWS opsin. Instead, they assigned the ~525 nm peak to the RH2 opsin class, which is consistent with other teleost RH2s absorbing in this range [52, 53, 55, 56]. However, it has not yet been discerned whether this peak is due to RH2-1 or RH2-2. Given RH2-1's low expression, relative to RH2-2 (~5% versus ~40% RA, respectively), and the rarity of 525 nm cones among Cumaná guppies , it appears that RH2-1 is a strong candidate for explaining the 525-533 nm peaks found in principle DCs among various populations. This assignment is also consistent with RH2-1 absorbing at 537 nm in bluefin killifish .
Archer and Lythgoe  were the first to detect the presence of UV-sensitive single cones with a λmax at 389 nm in guppies. Endler et al.  later reported (based on a V.N. Rush personal communication) cones with a λmax at 359 nm, while recent work by Watson et al.  showed identical results. In retrospect, it is understandable that Archer and colleague's early MSP studies [25, 26], as well as others preceding it (reviewed in Figure 3A), might have had difficulties detecting UV-sensitive cones due to the scanning range of their measuring beam (~370-730 nm). This appears to account for the lack of short corner-cones (SCs) described in previous MSP studies (Figure 3A). Indeed, ultra-structure studies on adult guppy retinas have shown SCs across the whole retina (Figure 3C), excluding a thin peripheral zone and most of the ventral retina (reviewed by Kunz ), which in teleosts generally contain SWS1 . Based on these data, we assign the 359 nm peak to SWS1 expression in SCs, which is consistent with SWS1-to-λmax assignments in other teleosts (reviewed by Hofmann and Carleton ).
With the above assignment, it is curious that our SWS1 expression data among all guppies examined is relatively low (<1% RA) given the apparent quantity of SCs in the retina (Figure 3B-C). This observation may be explained, in part, by ultra-structural analysis that showed a decrease in ventral SCs relative to that of the dorsal retina (Figure 3C) (reviewed by Kunz ). Furthermore, the spectral conditions (see Additional file 1) of our population and/or age at sampling might have contributed to these low expression levels. Such minimal SWS1 expression is not unique, as comparable levels are seen in zebrafish juveniles and adults , as well as adult medaka , while rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) experience more than a 20-fold decrease in SWS1 expression during development from parr to smolt .
RH1 expression, located in rods (λmax ≈ 503 nm) , fluctuated among guppy ages without a clear pattern emerging, with overall expression being relatively low compared to cone opsins (Figure 1). This was not expected since adult guppies have an increased number of rods relative to juveniles (Figure 3B-C), which should be reflected by RH1 upregulation in adults. Similar to the SWS1 expression pattern discussed above, the spectral environment of our population might have affected RH1 expression. Although the guppies used in this study were on a synthetic light-dark cycle, the lab population from which they were originally sampled experienced 24-hour artificial light conditions (accompanied by seasonal ambient lighting) since it was established six years prior to the present study. Additionally, guppy rods are known to move sclerally under photopic conditions . This movement increases absorption and recycling of the rod disks by the adjacent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [57, 61]. Furthermore, in the cichlid, Haplochromis burtoni, RH1 expression peaks near the beginning of the light cycle , while cone opsins are maximally expressed towards the end of the light cycle . With these factors in mind, it appears that low RH1 expression in guppies reflects both sampling time and artificial light conditions.
Opsin spatial expression
Guppy cone cells are organized into a square mosaic across the retina (reviewed by Kunz ). Thus, dorsal- and ventral-mediated vision is probably comparable to central vision with respect to visual acuity; putting equal importance on dorsal-ventral differences in opsin expression with respect to spectral sensitivity and/or discrimination. MSP data indicate that the majority of twin DCs and LCs in the ventral retina of guppies express LWS pigments (Figure 3C). In other fish, dorsal-ventral differences in expression are also seen. Zebrafish, for example, express shorter wavelength-sensitive RH2-1, RH2-2, and LWS-2 in the dorsal retina, while expressing their longer wavelength-sensitive counterparts (RH2-3, RH2-4, and LWS-1) in the ventral retina [38, 63]. This expression of longer wavelength-sensitive opsins in the ventral retina of diurnal shallow-water species appears to be, at least partially, a result of the transmission properties of the water .
Guppies are a tropical, freshwater, surface dwelling species native to Trinidad and Venezuela [3, 26, 50], and are found in clear to tea colored water [64, 65]. The majority of these freshwater environments contain dissolved/suspended organic material that tends to absorb short-wavelength light, resulting in increased transmission of long-wavelengths through the water column (reviewed by Levine and MacNichol ). This appears to be reflected in the LWS-dominant ventral retina of the guppy, which at increasing depths seems tuned to the most abundant downwelling light (long-wavelengths), thereby maximizing contrast of objects above (e.g., food, predators, and conspecifics) (Figure 3D) [50, 66]. However, this adaptation may be at the cost of color discrimination, due to a single cone class (LWS) predominating in this region [50, 66]. Conversely, the dorsal-central retina seems well suited for color discrimination given the presence of at least three different cones pigments [50, 66], where we propose that spectrally diverse opsins (SWS2B, RH2-2, and A180, as well as S180 in females, for Cumaná guppies) predominate (Figure 3D). This opsin expression pattern would be fitting since males perform courtship displays most often in front and sometimes slightly below females [67, 68].
Complicating the interpretation of opsin expression and MSP data is the potential for coexpression of two or more visual opsins in a cone cell. This might explain the low expression of some of the opsin genes detected in our guppy population. Coexpression may serve to expand the absorption range of guppy cones, as this appears to be the case for the Siberian hamster . Recently, rainbow trout have been shown to coexpress RH2 duplicates during the parr-to-smolt transition, yielding a cone with a broader absorption range than other classes . However, coexpression is likely to diminish photoreceptor sensitivity to a specific wavelength if total opsin expression in that cell is constant.
Individual opsin expression
Low-abundance opsins may play a key role in guppy vision even if their transcript levels are a consequence of expression in relatively few cones cells. For example, humans have approximately 92 million rods and about 4.6 million cones per eye . Thus, about five percent of photoreceptors are responsible for generating color vision, while only 5-10 percent of this population is comprised of SWS cones (reviewed by Calkins ). Despite this relatively small quantity of SWS cones, humans can readily detect short wavelengths of light, and when SWS is not functional or absent (i.e., tritanopia, or 'blue-yellow color blindness') the effect on color discrimination is often dramatic (reviewed by Bowmaker [73, 74]). With this in mind, one should not discount the potential role of even a small population of guppy cone cells. Alternatively, it is possible that one or more of the opsin genes with low-abundance transcription are upregulated at a time not represented in this study (e.g., embryonic development).
LWSupregulation in adult guppies
In the previous section we formed a model of opsin expression in the guppy cone mosaic that is consistent with the selective pressures of environmental spectra and sexual selection. With this in mind, we now seek to identify the evolutionary forces that have led to this species' LWS expression pattern.
An important finding of this study is the marked upregulation of A180 from near 3% RA in juveniles to about 20% RA in adults (Figure 2A). These data may have far-reaching implications, as it supports our hypothesis that if opsin gene duplication and divergence plays a role in sexual selection then we expect to see LWS upregulation coinciding with sexual maturity (i.e., adulthood). This result thereby implicates A180 in conferring adult guppies with increased spectral sensitivity and/or discrimination. However, the selective pressures that may have led to, and/or maintained, this upregulation appear to differ between sexes.
For males, we propose that A180 upregulation enhances detection of foods with greater quantities of carotenoids. This ability would increase conspicuousness (i.e., spot coloration), as guppies do not synthesize carotenoid pigments de novo; instead, the acquisition and subsequent modification of such pigments starts with ingestion of carotenoids found in the fruit and algal component of their diet [75–77]. Being able to better detect food would increase overall fitness, while acquisition of foods with greater amounts of carotenoids would increase the color saturation of orange spots [75, 76, 78], which is an indicator of foraging ability [76, 79] and immunocompetence [80, 81]. In turn, reproductive fitness levels would rise since females from many populations show a preference for males with greater orange spot area and color saturation [4, 64, 75, 76]. Together, these factors are strong candidates for selective forces driving A180 upregulation in male guppies.
For females, we propose that increased A180 expression would allow for enhanced spectral discrimination of male spot coloration - long known to be an integral trait assessed by females in a prospective mate [2–4, 32] - or provide improved detection and evaluation of male sigmoid displays. The latter of which was proposed by Ward et al.  regarding non-specific LWS upregulation. Interestingly, the juvenile-to-female transition also showed upregulation of S180 from about 1.5% to 7% RA (Figure 2A and 2C), which further supports our hypothesis of LWS upregulation at sexual maturity, suggesting that increased S180 may also enhance discrimination of male coloration or courtship displays. Furthermore, our secondary survey detected small but statistically significant A180 upregulation in females relative to males (Figure 2C), which may also augment spectral discrimination of male coloration. Importantly, these data are consistent with laboratory and wild guppy disk-pecking experiments that showed both sexes are attracted to orange colors, while females exhibited a greater interest for orange and males for yellow , which may reflect female upregulation of S180 and/or the small upregulation (relative to males) of A180 detected in the present study. Additionally, it is possible that females also benefit from consumption of carotenoid-rich food, as guppy egg carotenoid levels positively correlate with dietary intake; although, offspring quality does not appear to be affected . Intriguingly, the only other known taxa with sex-specific differences in opsin gene expression are the lycaenid butterflies, where color-based sexual selection has also been demonstrated .
For both male and female guppies, it has been proposed that increased expression of spectrally distinct opsins can aide in motion detection , which may heighten male (possibly rival male) detection or predator avoidance. However, if the increased expression and number of LWS opsins seen in adults confers an adaptive advantage with respect to predation, then one would expect upregulation of these genes to be selected for at earlier developmental stages (i.e., juveniles). This indicates that upregulation of A180 and S180 confers an adaptive advantage to events that occur later on in life, such as rival male detection, food acquisition, or mate choice. It is, therefore, fitting that disk pecking experiments also showed a lack of juvenile preference between orange and red colors, which may reflect an inability to discriminate between the two, while adults were able to make this distinction . This suggests that adults have increased discrimination of long wavelengths of light - an ability usually afforded by additional spectrally-distinct LWS opsins [30, 31], which we propose is a function of the A180 and S180 upregulation only observed in adults. Furthermore, no differences in color preference were detected between guppies from high- versus low-predation populations , indicating that color discrimination is not linked to predation.
Our above proposal is also consistent with Rodd et al.'s  work, which indicates that female guppies' preference for male orange-coloration has developed as a product of a sensory bias for orange-colored objects, such as carotenoid-rich fruits. Thus, the high expression of A180 in males and their ability to discriminate longer wavelengths of light is not surprising, as it probably was beneficial for both sexes to be able to detect fruit before female's preference for male coloration emerged.
Effects of LCR proximity on opsin gene expression in guppy eyes
For guppies, Watson et al.  hypothesized that if A180 is located closest to the putative LCR then this may explain its relatively high expression among LWS, as distance from a LCR has been shown to negatively correlate with opsin expression (reviewed by Watson et al. ). Now that the genomic location of these genes are known for guppy, we expand on this hypothesis in that both SWS2B and A180 should be the most highly expressed genes in the SWS2-LWS gene cluster if distance to the LCR negatively correlates with expression. Our results indicate that this might be the case, with SWS2B and A180 exhibiting predominant expression in this gene cluster (Figure 4A). Zebrafish also exhibit highest expression of their most proximal LWS (LWS-1) , while both LWS-1 and LWS-2 exhibit different spatial expression [38, 63]. However, medaka deviate from this pattern with SWS2A expression exceeding SWS2B (Figure 4A), while expression data for its two LWS (A and B) are unknown since primers that can distinguish between the two were not used . Currently, quantitative expression data for X. helleri opsins are also unknown.
If the above upregulation is solely a consequence of proximity to the LCR, then A180 levels should be consistent among populations since this genomic architecture would not likely vary. However, it is clear that among teleosts, locus distance to a LCR does not always negatively correlate with expression, implying that other cis- or trans-acting factors also regulate expression in this gene cluster, which may explain the differences in LWS-cone maximal absorption among populations and individuals.
S180rgenomic location and expression
Both guppies and X. helleri possess a fourth LWS (S180r) that lacks introns II-V and is located in intron XI of gephyrin (GPHN) (Figure 4B), which suggests that S180r is a result of retrotransposition [8, 35, 41]. This is consistent with retrogenes typically inserting into areas of the genome unlinked to the progenitor gene (reviewed by Kaessmann et al. ). Orthologs of S180r have also recently been identified in the one-sided livebearer (Jenynsia onca) and the four-eyed fish (Anableps anableps) [24, 86]. Furthermore, exon/intron I structure and length are highly conserved between guppy S180r and its progenitor gene, S180, as is the case in X. helleri (Figure 4B), indicating that S180r did not obtain its single intron post retrotransposition.
While the intron that survived retroduplication might bear enhancers that promote expression in the retina, it is also possible that the S180r transcripts we detected in guppy eyes were driven by GPHN regulatory elements. However, since S180r is in the reverse orientation to GPHN (Figure 4B), GPHN pre-mRNA (i.e., before intron splicing) could not additionally function as the coding strand for the S180r protein; although, the S180r non-coding region could be converted into cDNA and amplified by RT-qPCR, yielding the appearance of low-level coding-transcripts where there may be none. Nonetheless, transcription of S180r (i.e., yielding coding strand mRNA) in the eye may occur via other mechanisms (Figure 4B). One such mechanism stems from GPHN being present at inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synapses where it aids in the translocation and stabilization of GABA receptors to the postsynaptic membrane (reviewed by Sassoe-Pagnetto ). Thus, it would be highly expressed in guppy eyes since there are a myriad of GABAergic synapses present in the vertebrate retina . GPHN's high expression would probably be accompanied by an increasingly open chromatin structure where retrogenes are more accessible to transcriptional machinery , while neighboring GPHN enhancers may also facilitate S180r transcription.
Our RT-qPCR analysis of visual-opsin gene expression in juvenile and adult guppies has enabled us to propose the first opsin-to-λmax assignments for all photoreceptors in the cone mosaic. Where SWS1 (λmax ≈ 359 nm) is expressed in SCs, SWS2B (λmax ≈ 408 nm) is expressed in LCs, RH2-2 (λmax ≈ 465 nm) is expressed in the accessory member of DCs, and LWS opsins (A180, λmax ≈ 540 nm, predominating in Cumaná guppies) are expressed in the principle member of DCs, LWS ventral twin-DCs, and ventral LCs. Variation in λmax of LWS cones among guppies appears to be a result of individual and/or population level differences, which likely explains the low-abundance LWS transcripts detected in the present study. Although our results indicate that Cumaná guppy juveniles, males, and females are at least di-, tri-, and tetra-chromatic, respectively, it is important to keep in mind that opsin coexpression and differential spatial-temporal expression may enable low-abundance opsins to be visually relevant. in situ hybridization experiments will be carried out to test this hypothesis.
Marked LWS (A180 and to lesser extent S180) upregulation in adults coincides with males donning orange and red spots, whose area and color saturation positively correlate with reproductive fitness and carotenoid-rich food ingestion. Given this, and that behavioral studies suggest that adults may have greater discriminatory abilities at longer wavelengths light than juveniles, LWS upregulation in adults is implicated in enhancing spectral discrimination of male coloration and carotenoid-rich foods, with the former seeming to have arisen from a sensory bias of the latter.
In the SWS2-LWS gene cluster, genes closest to the candidate LCR, SWS2B and A180, exhibited the highest expression. However, locus distance to a LCR does not always negatively correlate with expression in other teleosts, indicating that additional regulatory factors are present. This may account for the differences in LWS-cone λmax among guppy populations and individuals.
The authors thank Felix Breden, Corey Watson, and Ben Sandkam of Simon Fraser University for helpful comments and discussions, as well as for sharing unpublished sequence and MSP data, and special thanks to Anna von Rossum of Simon Fraser University for editing the manuscript. Additional thanks to researchers from the University of Victoria: Roderick Haesevoets from the Centre for Biomedical Research DNA Sequencing Facility, Caren Helbing for aid in developing a qPCR buffer, Brad Anholt for use of his Stratagene® Mx4000® Multiplex Quantitative PCR machine, and Nigel Livingston for use of his Ocean Optics Inc USB2000 spectrophotometer. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
- Winge O: The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. Journal of Genetics. 1927, 18: 1-43. 10.1007/BF03052599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Endler JA: Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 1983, 9: 173-190. 10.1007/BF00690861.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Endler JA: Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution. 1980, 34: 76-91. 10.2307/2408316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Houde AE: Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution. 1987, 41: 1-10. 10.2307/2408968.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans JP, Zane L, Francescato S, Pilastro A: Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature. 2003, 421: 360-363. 10.1038/nature01367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann M, Tripathi N, Henz SR, Lindholm AK, Weigel D, Breden F, Dreyer C: Opsin gene duplication and diversification in the guppy, a model for sexual selection. Proc Biol Sci. 2007, 274: 33-42. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3707.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Weadick CJ, Chang BSW: Long-wavelength sensitive visual pigments of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Six opsins expressed in a single individual. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007, 7 (suppl 1): S1-S11. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ward MN, Churcher AM, Dick KJ, Laver CR, Owens GL, Polack MD, Ward PR, Breden F, Taylor JS: The molecular basis of color vision in colorful fish: Four long wave-sensitive (lws) opsins in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are defined by amino acid substitutions at key functional sites. BMC Evol Biol. 2008, 8: 210-10.1186/1471-2148-8-210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Farr JA: Role of predation in evolution of social-behavior of natural-populations of guppy, Poecilia-reticulata (pisces-poeciliidae). Evolution. 1975, 29: 151-158. 10.2307/2407148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodd FH, Reznick DN: Variation in the demography of guppy populations: The importance of predation and life histories. Ecology. 1997, 78: 405-418.Google Scholar
- Rodd FH, Reznick DN, Sokolowski MB: Phenotypic plasticity in the life history traits of guppies: Responses to social environment. Ecology. 1997, 78: 419-433. 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0419:PPITLH]2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reznick DN, Bryga HA: Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata: Poeciliidae) .5. Genetic basis of parallelism in life histories. American Naturalist. 1996, 147: 339-359. 10.1086/285855.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reznick DN, Butler MJ, Rodd FH, Ross P: Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) .6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution. 1996, 50: 1651-1660. 10.2307/2410901.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luyten PH, Liley NR: Geographic-variation in the sexual-behavior of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (peters). Behaviour. 1985, 95: 164-179. 10.1163/156853985X00109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- ENDLER JA: A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evolutionary Biology. 1978, 11: 319-364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Endler JA: Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res. 1991, 31: 587-608. 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90109-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamb TD, Collin SP, Pugh EN: Evolution of the vertebrate eye: Opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007, 8: 960-976. 10.1038/nrn2283.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lamb TD: Evolution of vertebrate retinal photoreception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2009, 364: 2911-2924. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0102.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama S: Molecular evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000, 19: 385-419. 10.1016/S1350-9462(00)00002-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collin SP, Knight MA, Davies WL, Potter IC, Hunt DM, Trezise AE: Ancient colour vision: Multiple opsin genes in the ancestral vertebrates. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: R864-865. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okano T, Kojima D, Fukada Y, Shichida Y, Yoshizawa T: Primary structures of chicken cone visual pigments: Vertebrate rhodopsins have evolved out of cone visual pigments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 5932-5936. 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5932.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Collin SP, Davies WL, Hart NS, Hunt DM: The evolution of early vertebrate photoreceptors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009, 364: 2925-2940. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0099.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hunt DM, Carvalho LS, Cowing JA, Davies WL: Evolution and spectral tuning of visual pigments in birds and mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009, 364: 2941-2955. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0044.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Owens GL, Windsor DJ, Mui J, Taylor JS: A fish eye out of water: Ten visual opsins in the four-eyed fish, anableps anableps. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e5970-10.1371/journal.pone.0005970.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Archer SN, Endler JA, Lythgoe JN, Partridge JC: Visual pigment polymorphism in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Vision Res. 1987, 27: 1243-1252. 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90200-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Archer SN, Lythgoe JN: The visual pigment basis for cone polymorphism in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Vision Res. 1990, 30: 225-233. 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90038-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Endler JA, Basolo A, Glowacki S, Zerr J: Variation in response to artificial selection for light sensitivity in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Am Nat. 2001, 158: 36-48. 10.1086/320862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann CM, Carleton KL: Gene duplication and differential gene expression play an important role in the diversification of visual pigments in fish. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2009, 49: 630-643. 10.1093/icb/icp079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trezise AE, Collin SP: Opsins: Evolution in waiting. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: R794-796. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs GH, Williams GA, Cahill H, Nathans J: Emergence of novel color vision in mice engineered to express a human cone photopigment. Science. 2007, 315: 1723-1725. 10.1126/science.1138838.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mancuso K, Hauswirth WW, Li Q, Connor TB, Kuchenbecker JA, Mauck MC, Neitz J, Neitz M: Gene therapy for red-green colour blindness in adult primates. Nature. 2009, 461: 784-787. 10.1038/nature08401.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bourne GR, Breden F, Allen TC: Females prefer carotenoid colored males as mates in the pentamorphic livebearing fish, Poecilia parae. Naturwissenschaften. 2003, 90: 402-405. 10.1007/s00114-003-0444-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kodric-Brown A, Nicoletto PF: Consensus among females in their choice of males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1996, 39: 395-400. 10.1007/s002650050306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kodric-Brown A, Nicoletto PF: Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): The interaction between male color and display. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2001, 50: 346-351. 10.1007/s002650100374.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watson CT, Gray SM, Hoffmann M, Lubieniecki KP, Joy JB, Sandkam BA, Weigel D, Loew E, Dreyer C, Davidson WS, Breden F: Gene duplication and divergence of long wavelength-sensitive opsin genes in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 2010, Google Scholar
- Hayashi T, Motulsky AG, Deeb SS: Position of a 'green-red' hybrid gene in the visual pigment array determines colour-vision phenotype. Nature Genetics. 1999, 22: 90-93. 10.1038/8798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winderickx J, Battisti L, Motulsky AG, Deeb SS: Selective expression of human × chromosome-linked green opsin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 9710-9714. 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9710.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tsujimura T, Chinen A, Kawamura S: Identification of a locus control region for quadruplicated green-sensitive opsin genes in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 12813-12818. 10.1073/pnas.0704061104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Halstenberg S, Lindgren KM, Samagh SP, Nadal-Vicens M, Balt S, Fernald RD: Diurnal rhythm of cone opsin expression in the teleost fish Haplochromis burtoni. Vis Neurosci. 2005, 22: 135-141. 10.1017/S0952523805222022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li P, Temple S, Gao Y, Haimberger TJ, Hawryshyn CW, Li L: Circadian rhythms of behavioral cone sensitivity and long wavelength opsin mrna expression: A correlation study in zebrafish. J Exp Biol. 2005, 208: 497-504. 10.1242/jeb.01424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watson CT, Lubieniecki KP, Loew E, Davidson WS, Breden F: Genomic organization of duplicated short wave-sensitive and long wave-sensitive opsin genes in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri. Bmc Evolutionary Biology. 2010, 10: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-87.Google Scholar
- Bowmaker JK: Evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Vision Research. 2008, 48: 2022-2041. 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowmaker JK, Loew ER: The senses: A comprehensive reference. 2008, Boston: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
- Levine JS, MacNichol EF, Kraft T, Collins BA: Intraretinal distribution of cone pigments in certain teleost fishes. Science. 1979, 204: 523-526. 10.1126/science.432658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacNichol EF, Kunz YW, Levine JS, Harosi FI, Collins BA: Ellipsosomes: Organelles containing a cytochrome-like pigment in the retinal cones of certain fishes. Science. 1978, 200: 549-552. 10.1126/science.644317.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunz YW, Wise C: Structural differences of cone oil-droplets in light and dark adapted retina of Poecilia-reticulata-p. Experientia. 1978, 34: 246-249. 10.1007/BF01944706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nag TC, Bhattacharjee J: Retinal ellipsosomes: Morphology, development, identification, and comparison with oil droplets. Cell Tissue Res. 1995, 279: 633-637. 10.1007/BF00318176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama S, Radlwimmer FB: The molecular genetics and evolution of red and green color vision in vertebrates. Genetics. 2001, 158: 1697-1710.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama S, Radlwimmer B: The "Five-sites" Rule and the evolution of red and green color vision in mammals. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1998, 15: 560-567.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levine J, MacNichol EJ: Visual pigments in teleost fishes: Effects of habitat, microhabitat, and behavior on visual system evolution. Sensory Processes. 1979, 3: 95-131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levine JS, Lobel PS, MacNichol EF: Visual communication in fishes. Environmental physiology of fishes. Edited by: Ali MA. 1979, New York: Plenum Press, 447-475.Google Scholar
- Matsumoto Y, Fukamach S, Mitam H, Kawamura S: Functional characterization of visual opsin repertoire in medaka (Oryzias latipes). Gene. 2006, 371: 268-278. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuller RC, Carleton KL, Fadool JM, Spady TC, Travis J: Genetic and environmental variation in the visual properties of bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei. J Evol Biol. 2005, 18: 516-523. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00886.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davies WL, Collin SP, Hunt DM: Adaptive gene loss reflects differences in the visual ecology of basal vertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2009, 26: 1803-1809. 10.1093/molbev/msp089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shand J, Davies WL, Thomas N, Balmer L, Cowing JA, Pointer M, Carvalho LS, Trezise AE, Collin SP, Beazley LD, Hunt DM: The influence of ontogeny and light environment on the expression of visual pigment opsins in the retina of the black bream, acanthopagrus butcheri. J Exp Biol. 2008, 211: 1495-1503. 10.1242/jeb.012047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spady TC, Parry JWL, Robinson PR, Hunt DM, Bowmaker JK, Carleton KL: Evolution of the cichlid visual palette through ontogenetic subfunctionalization of the opsin gene arrays. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2006, 23: 1538-1547. 10.1093/molbev/msl014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunz YW: Cone mosaics in a teleost retina: Changes during light and dark adaptation. Experientia. 1980, 36: 1371-1374. 10.1007/BF01960104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allison WT, Dann SG, Helvik JV, Bradley C, Moyer HD, Hawryshyn CW: Ontogeny of ultraviolet-sensitive cones in the retina of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2003, 461: 294-306. 10.1002/cne.10682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chinen A, Hamaoka T, Yamada Y, Kawamura S: Gene duplication and spectral diversification of cone visual pigments of zebrafish. Genetics. 2003, 163: 663-675.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Veldhoen K, Allison WT, Veldhoen N, Anholt BR, Helbing CC, Hawryshyn CW: Spatio-temporal characterization of retinal opsin gene expression during thyroid hormone-induced and natural development of rainbow trout. Visual Neuroscience. 2006, 23: 169-179. 10.1017/S0952523806232139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young RW: A difference between rods and cones in renewal of outer segment protein. Investigative Ophthalmology. 1969, 8: 222-&-Google Scholar
- Korenbrot JI, Fernald RD: Circadian rhythm and light regulate opsin mrna in rod photoreceptors. Nature. 1989, 337: 454-457. 10.1038/337454a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takechi M, Kawamura S: Temporal and spatial changes in the expression pattern of multiple red and green subtype opsin genes during zebrafish development. J Exp Biol. 2005, 208: 1337-1345. 10.1242/jeb.01532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Endler JA, Houde AE: Geographic-variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution. 1995, 49: 456-468. 10.2307/2410270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Endler JA: Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist. 1992, 139: S125-S153. 10.1086/285308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levine JS, MacNichol EF: Color vision in fishes. Scientific American. 1982, 246: 108-117.Google Scholar
- Baerends GP, Brouwer R, Waterbolk HT: Ethological studies on Lebistes reticulatus (peters) 1. An analysis of the male courtship pattern. Behaviour. 1955, 8: 249-334. 10.1163/156853955X00238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liley NR: Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes. Behaviour Supplement. 1965, 1-197.Google Scholar
- Lukats A, Dkhissi-Benyahya O, Szepessy Z, Rohlich P, Vigh B, Bennett NC, Cooper HM, Szel A: Visual pigment coexpression in all cones of two rodents, the siberian hamster, and the pouched mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002, 43: 2468-2473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson L, Sabbah S, Hawryshyn C: Spectral sensitivity of single cones in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): A whole-cell voltage clamp study. Vision Research. 2010, 50: 2055-2061. 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE: Human photoreceptor topography. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1990, 292: 497-523. 10.1002/cne.902920402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calkins DJ: Seeing with s cones. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2001, 20: 255-287. 10.1016/S1350-9462(00)00026-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowmaker JK: Visual pigments and molecular genetics of color blindness. News Physiol Sci. 1998, 13: 63-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowmaker JK: Evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Vision Res. 2008, 48: 2022-2041. 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kodric-Brown A: Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: An environmental component to female choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1989, 25: 393-401. 10.1007/BF00300185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grether GF: Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: A test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution. 2000, 54: 1712-1724.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril CT: A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: Are male guppies mimicking fruit?. Proc Biol Sci. 2002, 269: 475-481. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1891.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grether GF, Kolluru GR, Lin K, Quiroz MA, Robertson G, Snyder AJ: Maternal effects of carotenoid consumption in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Functional Ecology. 2008, 22: 294-302. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01365.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karino K, Shinjo S, Sato A: Algal-searching ability in laboratory experiments reflects orange spot coloration of the male guppy in the wild. Behaviour. 2007, 144: 101-113. 10.1163/156853907779947427.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grether GF, Kasahara S, Kolluru GR, Cooper EL: Sex-specific effects of carotenoid intake on the immunological response to allografts in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 2004, 271: 45-49. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2526.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Houde AE, Torio AJ: Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies. Behavioral Ecology. 1992, 3: 346-351. 10.1093/beheco/3.4.346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sison-Mangus MP, Bernard GD, Lampel J, Briscoe AD: Beauty in the eye of the beholder: The two blue opsins of lycaenid butterflies and the opsin gene-driven evolution of sexually dimorphic eyes. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2006, 209: 3079-3090. 10.1242/jeb.02360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- White EM, Church SC, Willoughby LJ, Hudson SJ, Partridge JC: Spectral irradiance and foraging efficiency in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour. 2005, 69: 519-527. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakefield MJ, Anderson M, Chang E, Wei KJ, Kaul R, Graves JAM, Grutzner F, Deeb SS: Cone visual pigments of monotremes: Filling the phylogenetic gap. Visual Neuroscience. 2008, 25: 257-264. 10.1017/S0952523808080255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaessmann H, Vinckenbosch N, Long MY: Rna-based gene duplication: Mechanistic and evolutionary insights. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2009, 10: 19-31. 10.1038/nrg2487.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Windsor DJ, Owens GL: The opsin repertoire of jenynsia onca: A new perspective on gene duplication and divergence in livebearers. BMC Res Notes. 2009, 2: 159-10.1186/1756-0500-2-159.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sassoe-Pognetto M, Fritschy JM: Gephyrin, a major postsynaptic protein of gabaergic synapses. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2000, 12: 2205-2210. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00106.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chavez AE, Grimes WN, Diamond JS: Mechanisms underlying lateral gabaergic feedback onto rod bipolar cells in rat retina. Journal of Neuroscience. 2010, 30: 2330-2339. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5574-09.2010.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Anctil M, Ali MA: Cone droplets of mitochondrial origin in retina of Fundulus-heteroclitus (pisces-cyprinodontidae). Zoomorphologie. 1976, 84: 103-111. 10.1007/BF02568559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kunz YW, Ennis S: Ultrastructural diurnal changes of the retinal photoreceptors in the embryo of a viviparous teleost (Poecilia reticulata p.). Cell Differ. 1983, 13: 115-123. 10.1016/0045-6039(83)90103-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunz YW, Ennis S, Wise C: Ontogeny of the photoreceptors in the embryonic retina of the viviparous guppy, Poecilia reticulata p. (teleostei). An electron-microscopical study. Cell Tissue Res. 1983, 230: 469-486. 10.1007/BF00216193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunz YW, Wise C: Development of the photoreceptors in the embryonic retina of Lebistes reticulatus (peters). Electron microscopical investigations. (with 7 figures). Rev Suisse Zool. 1974, 81: 697-701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunz YW, Wise C: Regional differences of argentea and sclera in eye of Poecilia-reticulata-p (teleostei-cyprinodontidae) - light-microscopic and electron-microscopic study. Zoomorphologie. 1977, 87: 203-215. 10.1007/BF00995820.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yacob A, Kunz YW: 'disk shedding' in the cone outer segments of the teleost, Poecilia reticulata p. Cell Tissue Res. 1977, 181: 487-492. 10.1007/BF00221770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yacob A, Wise C, Kunz YW: The accessory outer segment of rods and cones in the retina of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata p. (teleostei). An electron microscopical study. Cell Tissue Res. 1977, 177: 181-193. 10.1007/BF00221080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.