SmTRC1, a novel Schistosoma mansoni DNA transposon, discloses new families of animal and fungi transposons belonging to the CACTA superfamily
© DeMarco et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 26 June 2006
Accepted: 07 November 2006
Published: 07 November 2006
The CACTA (also called En/Spm) superfamily of DNA-only transposons contain the core sequence CACTA in their Terminal Inverted Repeats (TIRs) and so far have only been described in plants. Large transcriptome and genome sequence data have recently become publicly available for Schistosoma mansoni, a digenetic blood fluke that is a major causative agent of schistosomiasis in humans, and have provided a comprehensive repository for the discovery of novel genes and repetitive elements. Despite the extensive description of retroelements in S. mansoni, just a single DNA-only transposon belonging to the Merlin family has so far been reported in this organism.
We describe a novel S. mansoni transposon named SmTRC1, for S. mansoni T ransposon R elated to C ACTA 1, an element that shares several characteristics with plant CACTA transposons. Southern blotting indicates approximately 30–300 copies of SmTRC1 in the S. mansoni genome. Using genomic PCR followed by cloning and sequencing, we amplified and characterized a full-length and a truncated copy of this element. RT-PCR using S. mansoni mRNA followed by cloning and sequencing revealed several alternatively spliced transcripts of this transposon, resulting in distinct ORFs coding for different proteins. Interestingly, a survey of complete genomes from animals and fungi revealed several other novel TRC elements, indicating new families of DNA transposons belonging to the CACTA superfamily that have not previously been reported in these kingdoms. The first three bases in the S. mansoni TIR are CCC and they are identical to those in the TIRs of the insects Aedes aegypti and Tribolium castaneum, suggesting that animal TRCs may display a CCC core sequence.
The DNA-only transposable element SmTRC1 from S. mansoni exhibits various characteristics, such as generation of multiple alternatively-spliced transcripts, the presence of terminal inverted repeats at the extremities of the elements flanked by direct repeats and the presence of a Transposase_21 domain, that suggest a distant relationship to CACTA transposons from Magnoliophyta. Several sequences from other Metazoa and Fungi code for proteins similar to those encoded by SmTRC1, suggesting that such elements have a common ancestry, and indicating inheritance through vertical transmission before separation of the Eumetazoa, Fungi and Plants.
Transposable elements constitute a large portion of the genomes of eukaryotes and play an important role in genome structure and evolution [1, 2]. They can be assigned to two broad groups, retroelements (Class I) and DNA-only transposable elements (Class II). Unlike the retroelements, DNA-only transposons do not rely on a RNA intermediate, but transpose directly from DNA using a multi-step cut and paste mechanism catalyzed by a transposase that recognizes the transposon DNA by its Terminal Inverted Repeats (TIRs) (Reviewed in ). Class II elements in eukaryotes can be categorized on the basis of sequence similarities into nine superfamilies: Mariner-TC1; hAT; P; Mutator; CACTA; PIF/Harbinger; Transib; piggyBac; and Merlin [3–5].
Most elements of the CACTA superfamily of DNA-only transposons (also called En/Spm) contain the core sequence CACTA in their TIRs and so far have only been described in plants [3, 5]. The prototypical CACTA maize Suppressor-mutator (Spm) transposon was one of the first transposons described by Barbara McClintock , and subsequent studies have shown that most of its length is occupied by a single transcription unit, which can be alternatively spliced to generate four distinct transcripts (tnpA to tnpD) encoding different proteins . Two of these transcripts, tnpA and tnpD, encode proteins that have been shown to be essential for transposition [8, 9]. TNPA protein has been shown to perform a role in reactivating the methylated transposon promoter and to repress active unmethylated promoter [10, 11], while TNPD protein interacts directly with TNPA and stabilizes its binding to DNA .
Schistosoma mansoni, a digenetic blood fluke, is a major cause of schistosomiasis in humans and an important source of morbidity on a global scale. The disease is endemic in 74 developing countries, infecting about 200 million individuals, and an additional 500–600 million are estimated to be at risk . The S. mansoni genome is approximately 270 Mbp long  and 55% of its content is expected to comprise mobile elements or other repetitive sequences . Recently, independent transcriptome and genome sequencing initiatives have provided an extensive repository for the discovery of novel genes and repetitive elements [16, 17]. Despite the extensive description of retroelements in S. mansoni [15, 18, 19], so far the presence of just a single DNA-only transposon, belonging to the Merlin family, has been reported in this organism .
Using the public repository of S. mansoni sequence data as a starting point, we describe a novel S. mansoni transposon named SmTRC1, an element that shares several characteristics with plant CACTA transposons, which suggests a distant relationship between these elements. A survey of complete genomes from the Animal and Fungi kingdoms revealed novel families of DNA transposons belonging to the CACTA superfamily.
Results and discussion
Isolation of SmTRC1 clones from S. mansoni genome
We found a 2 bp direct repeat suggestive of target site duplication flanking the inverted repeat in 7 out of 14 (50%) of the copies of these elements analyzed (Figure 2B). Three of these copies were found to be inserted into repetitive elements of the S. mansoni genome. Two of them were inserted into copies of the S. mansoni LTR retrotransposons Saci-1 and Saci-4 [18, 19] and one into an unidentified repetitive element of which there are at least 40 copies in the preliminary assembly of the S. mansoni genome. When the flanking sequences of these three elements were aligned with paralogous sequence copies of the respective repetitive element [GenBank:BH202328.1, GenBank:BN000802.1, GenBank:AL620357.1] obtained from either the GSS or the nr databases at GenBank, it was clear that the original repetitive element (not having an inserted transposon) contained none of the direct repeats flanking the SmTRC1 elements (Figure 2C); one of the 2bp direct repeat motifs was missing from the original repetitive element. This suggests that the direct repeats are in fact target-site duplications created by insertion of the SmTRC1 element. It is well known that transposon integration results in the duplication of a short host sequence at the insertion site and that the length of the target-site duplication is determined by the properties of each transposase , therefore these data provide further evidence for the mobility of SmTRC1 elements.
Using different combinations of a set of primers designed from the extremities of the transposon sequence from Supercontig_0018735, we performed several PCR reactions to amplify genomic copies of SmTRC1. A typical result is shown in Figure 1A; the major products are approximately 2.5 kbp. Cloning and sequencing of this major band revealed a 2274 bp clone that represented a truncated copy of SmTRC1, which we designated SmTRC1d1 (Figure 1B, bottom). This element displays a truncated ORF that codes for only 98 amino acids out of the 560 deduced from the full-length transposon. The entire sequence of SmTRC1d1 aligns with the full-length genomic transposon, but it lacks part of the ORF and its 3' tandem repeat (Figure 1B), hence its short length. The diversity of lower molecular weight bands generated by PCR (Figure 1A) suggests that SmTRC1 copies of several sizes, differently truncated, must exist in the S. mansoni genome.
For one set of PCR amplifications with genomic DNA as template, we used a 16 bp region downstream from the left TIR as forward primer, and a sequence composed of 8 bp overlapping the 3'-end of the right TIR plus a 12 bp region immediately downstream as reverse primer. This primer set permitted a copy of approximately 4.7 kb to be amplified; this copy was cloned and sequenced (Figure 1B, middle). The sequence was named SmTRC1f1; it lacked 71 bp at its 5'-end, including the left TIR, owing to the design of the primer used in the amplification reaction, but otherwise it appears to represent an integral copy of SmTRC1 (Figure 1B, middle). In fact, this clone displays 99.8 % nucleotide identity (only 9 mismatches over 4675 nucleotides) with the element described in Supercontig_0018735, and one base in the left TIR is deleted in both sequences. This suggests that we had cloned from the PCR products a copy representing the sequence contained in Supercontig_0018735; the nine mismatched bases may have arisen from mutations generated either naturally in the field among the copies from individual parasites, or artificially from the Taq polymerase during the PCR amplification step.
Identification of TRC transposons in other species
A BLASTP search against the nr database at GenBank was performed using the protein encoded by SmTRC1-ORF as query. The highest hits produced were with two proteins of unknown function from Schistosoma japonicum [GenBank:AAW24935.1] (with E-value 10-20) and Anopheles gambiae [GenBank:EAA01922.3] (with E-value 10-9). The next best hits (E-value 10-5) were with the TNPD proteins of CACTA transposons from Oryza sativa. It is worth noting that the region displaying similarity corresponds exactly to the Transposase_21 domain (Pfam 02992). In fact, as described below, global alignment of this region of the SmTRC1-ORF product with the Transposase_21 domains of CACTA transposons indicates several conserved residues.
The SmTRC1-ORF sequence was used as query to perform an additional TBLASTN search directly into several complete animal and fungal genomes using the Genomic Blast tool at NCBI. This search produced hits indicating high similarity (E-value 10-88 to 10-30) between the deduced SmTRC1-ORF translated sequence and translated sequences from genomes of such diverse animals as Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Ciona intestinalis, Danio rerio and Aedes aegypti. In all these cases, practically the whole protein was aligned, not only the Transposase_21 domain. The search against fungal genomes produced hits indicating moderate similarity (E-values 10-16 to 10-4) between the deduced SmTRC1-ORF translated sequence and translated sequences from the genomes of e.g. Rhizopus oryzae, Coprinopsis cinerea and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. For several of the above organisms, multiple hits were generated in the TBLASTN searches against the genomic sequence, indicating that more than one copy must be present in their genomes.
As noted earlier, SmTRC1 has a 54 bp TIR sequence at its extremities, which is consistently present in all copies examined. Also, the S. mansoni TIR sequence has an internal repeat of the motif AAAGGGGAAATAAAG. A TRC element of approximately 5.2 kb was detected in the Tribolium castaneum genomic sequence [GenBank:AAJJ01002287.1], and displays at its extremities an inverted repeat of 27 bp with the sequence CCCTAGTAGCACCGAATATTTGTAAAA. In addition, we found a 10 bp inverted repeat (CCCAGTCAAC) flanking a TRC in an A. aegypti genomic segment [GenBank:AAGE02020512] that delimits a 9.2 kb element. Both elements have a 2 bp direct repeat adjacent to each inverted repeat (Figure 2B), suggesting that target site duplication occurred when the mobile elements were inserted, analogous to the situation in the S. mansoni genomic sequences.
It is interesting to note that the first 3 bases in the TIRs from the T. castaneum and A. aegypti elements are identical to those in the TIR of S. mansoni (Figure 2D), suggesting that animal TRCs may display a CCC core sequence in their TIRs analogous to the CACTA core sequence in TIRs from CACTA transposons. Comparison of these animal TIRs with those of the plant CACTA transposons showed a high similarity between the T. castaneum TIR core sequence and the CACTA core sequence of plants, with only one mismatched base (Figure 2D). No such level of similarity is found in S. mansoni or A. aegypti TIR core sequences, which display only 3 and 2 coincident bases, respectively. Owing to the low numbers of bases and examples involved, it is difficult to determine whether the matching bases in T. castaneum are coincidental or reflect an evolutionary process.
We have not been able to characterize the TIRs flanking the ORFs of TRC elements in organisms other than those described above, namely S. mansoni, A. aegypti and T. castaneum. In some animal species, the TIRs may have become unrecognizable because of mutations or have been lost through further recombination. Another possibility is that some of these elements may represent domesticated transposases [23–26], which no longer transpose but perform another cellular function instead. Further analyses of these animal elements are warranted to determine which is the case for each particular element.
Estimation of the number of copies of Sm TRC1 by Southern blotting
SmTRC 1 produces multiple spliced transcripts
Intriguingly, no S. japonicum ESTs with homology to SmTRC1 were found by either BLASTN or TBLASTN searches using the full-length S. mansoni element as query against GenBank dbEST. This contrasts with the 70 S. mansoni ESTs (64 with discontinuous and 6 with continuous alignments) that were found with an E-value lower than 10-10 by a BLASTN search against the same database. This leads us to hypothesize that these elements either have a much lower transcriptional activity in S. japonicum than in S. mansoni or have been eliminated from the S. japonicum genome.
To document the existence of alternatively spliced transcripts in S. mansoni better, we used the sequences at the extremities of many of the 70 ESTs known to align to SmTRC1 to design primers for amplifying additional SmTRC1 transcripts by RT-PCR using mRNA as template. The RT-PCR reaction produced a strong amplification band of approximately 900 bp and sub-products of lower molecular weight, plus a faint amplification band of higher molecular weight, which suggests that full-length transcripts may be expressed at a low level (Figure 4A). No amplification was seen in the control without reverse transcription, indicating that the amplification products were in fact derived from bona fide transcribed messages.
We cloned and sequenced these different RT-PCR products. Mapping the different sequences to the full-length SmTRC1 genomic sequence confirmed a diversity of splicing patterns, as already suggested by mapping of previously existing GenBank ESTs (Figure 4B). Two of the sequenced clones (Clones B1 and B2) are similar in size to the major band from the RT-PCR reaction, indicating that this band may contain more than one product. These two products did not overlap the ORF region, and the intron formed between their exons 1 and 2 does not display the canonical CT-AG splicing sites. However, mapping of these transcripts to the entire S. mansoni genome showed that canonical splicing sites are present at the extremities of the same intron in some truncated forms of the element (data not shown). This indicates that these transcripts probably originated from truncated copies that are apparently transcriptionally active, being responsible for a considerable fraction of the SmTRC1 transcripts detected.
Clone B1 has an ORF of 681 bp that is interrupted by a TGA stop codon at bases 439 to 441. However, alignment with the SmTRC1f1 sequence shows substitution of the TGA by CTA, which codes for isoleucine (Figure 4C). We named this hypothetical protein product SmTRC-PrA (S. mansoni TRC Protein A). In addition, a 4 bp deletion at base 37 of this clone in relation to SmTRC1f1 produces a frame shift at the beginning of the message. This suggests that the transcript was generated from a truncated copy of this element and that degeneration has produced the stop codon interrupting the ORF. Clone B2 has a shorter ORF that codes for a product very similar to the deduced N-terminal amino acids of the ORF product of clone B1; this hypothetical protein product was named SmTRC-PrB.
Although most of the ESTs exhibit a splicing pattern that does not include the SmTRC1-ORF sequence in any exon, the presence of a few ESTs mapped in the region of the SmTRC1-ORF suggests that it is actually transcribed and translated. We were not able to clone the high molecular weight products directly from the first RT-PCR using primers designed from the extremities of EST sequences, but we designed a primer from the 5'-end of the SmTRC1-ORF sequence and used a primer from the 3' extremity of the transcripts. The ensuing RT-PCR resulted in the amplification of a partial transcript of 1.3 kb (data not shown). Cloning and sequencing of this message showed that it was indeed derived from exons mapping to the SmTRC1-ORF as well as from other exons in the 3' region (Figure 4B, clone B4). It codes for an incomplete hypothetical protein product of 125 amino acids named SmTRC-PrC. A longer, complete version of the message encoding a longer SmTRC-PrC protein is expected to exist, including the Transposase_21 domain in its amino-terminal portion. Clone B4 also exhibits a second ORF coding for a protein of 299 amino acids, 175 of which are shared with SmTRC-PrA (76% of the SmTRC-PrA amino acids). In view of this level of conservation, we named this protein SmTRC-PrA2. Characterization of additional clones could eventually identify further alternatively spliced forms of SmTRC1-derived transcripts.
The Spm element of Maize has been shown to display four different transcripts (TnpA-D) generated by alternative splicing, each coding for a different protein product . One of these transcripts (TnpD) spans the entire region comprising ORFs 1 and 2 predicted in the spm DNA, which explains the selection pressure that maintains such ORFs in the transposon structure. Similarly, we predict the existence of a spliced transcript spanning all the TRC1-ORF to explain the maintenance of such a large ORF and the conserved amino acid sequence observed on comparison with elements from other animals. The diverse splicing pattern of the transcribed S. mansoni messages results in distinct ORFs coding for different proteins; only the Transposase_21 domain of proteins encoded by these transposons has a detectable similarity with proteins from CACTA transposons. The other portions of the proteins encoded by these alternatively spliced S. mansoni transcripts appear not to be detectably conserved.
Spm TnpA, a short alternatively spliced transcript that lacks the Transposase_21 domain, is apparently more abundantly transcribed in plants than the other, longer transcripts. This reflects the results of RT-PCR experiments suggesting that shorter TRC transcripts are more abundantly transcribed in S. mansoni than the longer alternatively spliced transcript that includes the Transposase_21 domain. Spm TnpD displays two ORFs in tandem, one coding for TNPD and the other for TNPA . Likewise, clone B4 also exhibits two ORFs in tandem, one coding for SmTRC-PrC and the other for a SmTRC-PrA-like protein.
SmTRC 1 ORF contains a conserved Transposase_21 domain
Three different conserved motifs can be discerned, marked I-III in the aligned proteins (Figure 5). In most of the elements, a first conserved motif I/L/V-X-I/L/V/F-X-I/L/V/F-X2-D-G-X3-F/Y-X7–9-W-P-I/L/V of Transposase_21 domain is present (Figure 5, box I); however, in 3 out of 4 fungal sequences this motif shows an interchange between tryptophan and glycine residues. This suggests that these two residues have an important role and that only the position of one residue relative to the other is essential for activity of this protein. In the second conserved domain (Figure 5, box II), the fungal proteins show a level of conservation comparable to Magnoliophyta and higher than Eumetazoa. Thus, only proteins from Fungi and Magnoliophyta have a proline immediately after the conserved glycine residue (Figure 5, box II), and an additional P-L/I conserved motif in the middle of this domain; both are absent from Eumetazoa. Interestingly, we identified a L/V/I-D-X-L/M-H-X3-L-G motif in the Transposase_21 domain that is present in the eumetazoan TRC elements (Figure 5, box A) and also in 3 out of the 4 fungal TRC proteins, but is absent in proteins from Magnoliophyta.
Among the conserved residues there are two aspartyl residues (DD), one in the first and one in the third conserved domain, separated by 80 residues; this is very similar to the distance between the two aspartyl residues in the DDE motifs in Tn3 transposases . There is also a glutamyl residue (E) in the conserved domain 2 in all but three sequences, two of which have this residue in adjacent positions and one in a position 2 residues away. It is possible that conservation of such an amino acid triad reflects a similar catalytic mechanism in the DDE motif despite the different arrangement of residues. In this case its function would be similar to that described for the DDE motif, which is presumed to coordinate divalent metal ions to promote catalysis of DNA cleavage and ligation . Moreover, there is a conserved CXXC motif in the conserved domain 3 that is identical to the configuration of cysteines in the zinc-finger-like motifs (HHCC domains) of retroviral integrases, suggesting that TRC cysteines may also be involved in DNA binding.
The DNA-only transposable element SmTRC1 from S. mansoni exhibits various characteristics, such as generation of multiple spliced transcripts, the presence of terminal inverted repeats at the extremities of the elements flanked by direct repeats and the presence of a Transposase_21 domain, that suggest a distant relationship to CACTA transposons from Magnoliophyta. Despite these similarities, conservation of proteins deduced from this new family of transposons in relation to CACTA transposons is restricted to the Transposase_21 domain. The presence in S. mansoni of multiple transcripts and a higher expression level of a shorter alternatively spliced transcript coding for an ORF lacking the Transposase_21 domain suggests that similar strategies are employed by transposons from animals and plants. The absence of conservation between SmTRC-PrA/SmTRC-PrB and plant TNPA protein indicates that these S. mansoni proteins either have a different evolutionary origin or are very divergent. The latter is more probable since we could detect no similarity between the S. mansoni proteins SmTRC-PrA and SmTRC-PrB and any sequences encoded in other animal or fungal TRC elements by BLASTP or TBLASTN comparison to the genomes of these organisms, suggesting that this protein is rapidly evolving. Nevertheless, SmTRC-PrA must perform an analogous role to the DNA binding function described for TNPA in plant transposons, and experimental verification of this hypothesis is warranted.
Several sequences from Metazoa and Fungi code for proteins similar to those encoded by SmTRC, providing evidence that this superfamily exists in branches other than Plants. Data from phylogenetic analysis of the Transposase_21 domain suggests a common ancestry for such elements, and indicates inheritance through vertical transmission before the separation of Eumetazoa, Fungi and Plants. This organization permits a division of the CACTA superfamily into 3 different families, each represented by one of these branches (circles in Figure 6). The C. neoformans element appears to be an exception, being more closely related to the plant transposon family than to the Fungi family.
In view of the evolutionary distance between these related elements, the few conserved amino acids of the Transposase_21 domain must be essential for TNPD function. These conserved residues are preferential targets for future mutagenesis experiments to determine the importance of the Transposase_21 domain for TNPD function, as they are expected to abolish or significantly alter the domain functionality.
Discovery of this new transposable element in S. mansoni should help in obtaining a more complete annotation of the genome of this parasite. Apparently DNA transposons are not as widespread as retroelements in S. mansoni, since only 2 elements of the former type (; this report) and 28 of the latter type [15, 19] have been described. Nevertheless, DNA transposons may have a significant impact on the biology of the parasite. Comparison between Merlin and SmTRC1 shows that these elements have very distinct characteristics, the former being more compact (1.4 kpb  as opposed to 4.5 kbp) and presenting a slightly higher copy number, with an estimated 500 copies  compared to 30–300 for SmTRC1. On the other hand, most of the copies from both SmTRC1 and Merlin elements appear to be internal deletion derivatives. Several transcripts of both elements have been detected in the S. mansoni EST database, suggesting that both are transcriptionally active.
In addition, it is interesting to consider the SmTRC1 element as a potential new tool for insertional mutagenesis experiments in Schistosoma and other platyhelminths; CACTA elements have been successfully used for this purpose in plants [30, 31]. Moreover, other superfamilies of transposons have been widely used for invertebrate and vertebrate transgene experiments and constitute a valuable tool for analyzing gene function and effects on phenotype [32–34]. Further studies on other Metazoa and Fungi elements from the family described here will certainly provide candidate vectors for several other organisms.
RT-PCR and genomic DNA PCR
The BH isolates of S. mansoni were maintained in the laboratory by routine passage through mice and snails. Adult parasites were obtained by portal perfusion of hamsters 7 to 8 weeks after infection. Tissues were conserved in RNALater (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Tissue mRNAs were extracted using MAC isolation kits (Miltenyi Biotec). mRNA samples were treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (1 U/10 μl; Promega) for 30 minutes at 37°C. cDNAs were prepared using the Superscript II first strand synthesis system for RT-PCR (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's instructions. A parallel control reaction was performed without the addition of reverse transcriptase and used as template for a PCR reaction to detect any genomic DNA contamination. The PCR step was performed using Advantage II polymerase (Clontech) with the buffer supplied by the manufacturer, 200 μM dNTPs, and 200 nM of each primer using the following program: 95°C (1 min); 35 cycles of 95°C (30 s), 55°C (30 s) and 68°C (4 min); and final extension at 68°C (3 min). The reaction products were cloned into pGem-T vector (Promega) and sequenced.
Genomic DNA was extracted from 800 mg of adult worms (approximately 3,000 worms) using the protocol described by Ausubel et al. . PCR reactions were performed using the same conditions as described in the previous paragraph.
Southern blot experiments for estimating the number of copies of SmTRC1 were performed according to the protocol described by DeMarco et al. , except that Stu I was used in place of BamH I and that Saci-2 was used as a benchmark. The total signal intensity for each lane was calculated using ImageQuant v5.1 (Molecular Dynamics), with a fixed area rectangle to delimit the area for each sample analyzed.
Sequence alignment and construction of phylogenetic trees
Using the deduced protein sequence of the Transposase_21 domain from SmTRC1, we retrieved several other sequences that showed significant similarity (E-values less than 10-4) in a tBLASTn search against genomes of Metazoa and Fungi at NCBI. We used these sequences along with the sequences of known CACTA transposons from Magnoliophyta to perform an alignment using ClustalX v1.83 . Alignments were imported to the GeneDoc program V2.6.002 for shading of conserved residues. Further analysis with Clustal X and the neighbor-joining method, using the three conserved regions indicated by boxes I to III in Figure 5 and excluding positions with gaps, resulted in the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 6. The confidence of the branches was evaluated by bootstrap analysis using 1,000 samplings. Phylogenetic trees were drawn using Treeview (version 1.6.6) . The GenBank sequences and accession numbers utilized for construction of alignments and phylogenetic trees are as follows: (1) Transposase family tnp2 members – Arabdopsis thaliana, [GenBank:CAB80813.1]; Brassica rapa, [GenBank:BAA85462]; Daucus carota, [GenBank:BAA20532.1], Oryza sativa, [GenBank:DAA02106.1]; Zea mays, [GenBank:AAA66266.1]; Ipomoea trifida, [GenBank:AAS79612.1]; (2) Whole genome DNA sequences – Aedes aegypti, [GenBank:AAGE02020512]; Danio rerio, [GenBank:CAAK02057130.1]; Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, [GenBank:AAGJ01221697.1]; Ciona intestinalis, [GenBank:AABS01001120.1]; Tribolium castaneum, [GenBank:AAJJ01002287.1]; Drosophila pseudoobscura, [GenBank:AADE01004520.1]; Glomus intraradices, [GenBank:AC156590]; Phakopsora pachyrhizi, [GenBank:AC149399]; Cryptococcus neoformans, [GenBank:EAL18770.1]; Rhizopus oryzae, [GenBank:AACW02000214.1].
Accession numbers of sequences identified in this work
We have deposited all sequences obtained in this work at EMBL under the following numbers: SmTRC1f1, [EMBL:AM268206]; SmTRC1d1, [EMBL:AM268205]; SmTRC-PrA, [EMBL:AM268207]; SmTRC-PrB, [EMBL:AM268208]; SmTRC-PrC, [EMBL:AM268209]. We have also deposited Third Party Annotations (TPAs) at EMBL for Transposase family Tnp2 members, under the following TPA numbers: Aedes aegypti, [EMBL:BN000947]; Danio rerio, [EMBL:BN000951]; Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, [EMBL:BN000955]; Ciona intestinalis, [EMBL:BN000948]; Tribolium castaneum, [EMBL:BN000946]; Drosophila pseudoobscura, [EMBL:BN000950]; Glomus intraradices, [EMBL:BN000952]; Phakopsora pachyrhizi, [EMBL:BN000953]; Rhizopus oryzae, [EMBL:BN000954]; Cryptococcus neoformans, [EMBL:BN000949].
This work was supported by a grant from FAPESP, Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, and by fellowships from FAPESP and CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brasil. The technical assistance of Renato Alvarenga is acknowledged.
- Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W: The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994, 371 (6494): 215-220. 10.1038/371215a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kidwell MG, Lisch D: Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (15): 7704-7711. 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7704.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz AM: Mobile DNA II. 2002, Washington, D.C. , ASM Press, xviii, 1204 p.,  p. of plates-Google Scholar
- Feschotte C: Merlin, a new superfamily of DNA transposons identified in diverse animal genomes and related to bacterial IS1016 insertion sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2004, 21 (9): 1769-1780. 10.1093/molbev/msh188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Capy P, Bazin C, Higuet D, Langin T: Dynamics and evolution of transposable elements. Molecular biology intelligence unit. 1998, Austin, Tex; New York , Landes Bioscience ; North American distributor Chapman & Hall, 197 p.-Google Scholar
- McClintock B: The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1950, 36 (6): 344-355. 10.1073/pnas.36.6.344.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masson P, Rutherford G, Banks JA, Fedoroff N: Essential large transcripts of the maize Spm transposable element are generated by alternative splicing. Cell. 1989, 58 (4): 755-765. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90109-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masson P, Strem M, Fedoroff N: The tnpA and tnpD gene products of the Spm element are required for transposition in tobacco. Plant Cell. 1991, 3 (1): 73-85. 10.1105/tpc.3.1.73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frey M, Reinecke J, Grant S, Saedler H, Gierl A: Excision of the En/Spm transposable element of Zea mays requires two element-encoded proteins. EMBO Journal. 1990, 9 (12): 4037-4044.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlappi M, Raina R, Fedoroff N: Epigenetic regulation of the maize Spm transposable element: novel activation of a methylated promoter by TnpA. Cell. 1994, 77 (3): 427-437. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90157-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui H, Fedoroff NV: Inducible DNA demethylation mediated by the maize Suppressor-mutator transposon-encoded TnpA protein. Plant Cell. 2002, 14 (11): 2883-2899. 10.1105/tpc.006163.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raina R, Schlappi M, Karunanandaa B, Elhofy A, Fedoroff N: Concerted formation of macromolecular Suppressor-mutator transposition complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (15): 8526-8531. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8526.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- WHO-Geneve: WHO Technical Report Series 912: prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. 2002, Geneva , World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Simpson AJ, Sher A, McCutchan TF: The genome of Schistosoma mansoni: isolation of DNA, its size, bases and repetitive sequences. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1982, 6 (2): 125-137. 10.1016/0166-6851(82)90070-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brindley PJ, Laha T, McManus DP, Loukas A: Mobile genetic elements colonizing the genomes of metazoan parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19 (2): 79-87. 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)00061-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verjovski-Almeida S, DeMarco R, Martins EA, Guimaraes PE, Ojopi EP, Paquola AC, Piazza JP, Nishiyama MY, Kitajima JP, Adamson RE, Ashton PD, Bonaldo MF, Coulson PS, Dillon GP, Farias LP, Gregorio SP, Ho PL, Leite RA, Malaquias LC, Marques RC, Miyasato PA, Nascimento AL, Ohlweiler FP, Reis EM, Ribeiro MA, Sa RG, Stukart GC, Soares MB, Gargioni C, Kawano T, Rodrigues V, Madeira AM, Wilson RA, Menck CF, Setubal JC, Leite LC, Dias-Neto E: Transcriptome analysis of the acoelomate human parasite Schistosoma mansoni. Nat Genet. 2003, 35 (2): 148-157. 10.1038/ng1237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- El-Sayed NM, Bartholomeu D, Ivens A, Johnston DA, LoVerde PT: Advances in schistosome genomics. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20 (4): 154-157. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.02.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeMarco R, Kowaltowski AT, Machado AA, Soares MB, Gargioni C, Kawano T, Rodrigues V, Madeira AMBN, Wilson RA, Menck CFM, Setubal JC, Dias-Neto E, Leite LCC, Verjovski-Almeida S: Saci-1, -2 and -3 and Perere, four novel retrotransposons with high transcriptional activities from the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni. J Virol. 2004, 78: 2967-2978. 10.1128/JVI.78.6.2967-2978.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeMarco R, Machado AA, Bisson-Filho AW, Verjovski-Almeida S: Identification of 18 new transcribed retrotransposons in Schistosoma mansoni. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 333 (1): 230-240. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute S. mansoni genome project. [http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_mansoni/]
- Plasterk RH, Izsvak Z, Ivics Z: Resident aliens: the Tc1/mariner superfamily of transposable elements. Trends Genet. 1999, 15 (8): 326-332. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01777-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang GD, Tian PF, Cheng ZK, Wu G, Jiang JM, Li DB, Li Q, He ZH: Genomic characterization of Rim2/Hipa elements reveals a CACTA-like transposon superfamily with unique features in the rice genome. Mol Genet Genomics. 2003, 270 (3): 234-242. 10.1007/s00438-003-0918-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller WJ, McDonald JF, Nouaud D, Anxolabehere D: Molecular domestication--more than a sporadic episode in evolution. Genetica. 1999, 107 (1-3): 197-207. 10.1023/A:1004070603792.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bundock P, Hooykaas P: An Arabidopsis hAT-like transposase is essential for plant development. Nature. 2005, 436 (7048): 282-284. 10.1038/nature03667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hammer SE, Strehl S, Hagemann S: Homologs of Drosophila P transposons were mobile in zebrafish but have been domesticated in a common ancestor of chicken and human. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22 (4): 833-844. 10.1093/molbev/msi068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cordaux R, Udit S, Batzer MA, Feschotte C: Birth of a chimeric primate gene by capture of the transposase gene from a mobile element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (21): 8101-8106. 10.1073/pnas.0601161103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pereira A, Cuypers H, Gierl A, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Saedler H: Molecular analysis of the En/Spm transposable element system of Zea mays. EMBO Journal. 1986, 5 (5): 835-841.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kapitonov VV, Jurka J: Molecular paleontology of transposable elements from Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetica. 1999, 107 (1-3): 27-37. 10.1023/A:1004030922447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yurieva O, Nikiforov V: Catalytic center quest: comparison of transposases belonging to the Tn3 family reveals an invariant triad of acidic amino acid residues. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1996, 38 (1): 15-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wisman E, Cardon GH, Fransz P, Saedler H: The behaviour of the autonomous maize transposable element En/Spm in Arabidopsis thaliana allows efficient mutagenesis. Plant Mol Biol. 1998, 37 (6): 989-999. 10.1023/A:1006082009151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tissier AF, Marillonnet S, Klimyuk V, Patel K, Torres MA, Murphy G, Jones JD: Multiple independent defective suppressor-mutator transposon insertions in Arabidopsis: a tool for functional genomics. Plant Cell. 1999, 11 (10): 1841-1852. 10.1105/tpc.11.10.1841.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Handler AM: A current perspective on insect gene transformation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2001, 31 (2): 111-128. 10.1016/S0965-1748(00)00159-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy AJ, Clark K, Carlson CM, Fritz S, Davidson AE, Markley KM, Finley K, Fletcher CF, Ekker SC, Hackett PB, Horn S, Largaespada DA: Mammalian germ-line transgenesis by transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99 (7): 4495-4499. 10.1073/pnas.062630599.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Izsvak Z, Ivics Z: Sleeping beauty transposition: biology and applications for molecular therapy. Mol Ther. 2004, 9 (2): 147-156. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K: Preparation of genomic DNA from mammalian tissue. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 1994, Hoboken , John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (24): 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Page RD: TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996, 12 (4): 357-358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.