Phylogeography and domestication of Indian river buffalo
© Kumar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 30 January 2007
Accepted: 04 October 2007
Published: 04 October 2007
The water buffalo- Bu balus bubalis holds tremendous potential in livestock sector in many Asian countries, particularly India. The origin, domestication and genetic structure of the Indian river buffalo are poorly understood. Therefore, to understand the relationship among the maternal lineages of Indian river buffalo breeds and their domestication process, we analysed mitochondrial D-loop region of 217 animals representing eight breeds from eight different locations in India along with published sequences of Mediterranean buffalo.
The maximum parsimony tree showed one major clade with six internal branches. Reduced median network revealed expansion from more than one set of haplotypes indicating complex domestication events for this species. In addition, we found several singleton haplotypes. Using rho statistics, we obtained a time estimate of 6300 years BP for the expansion of one set of hapltoypes of the Indian domestic buffalo. A few breed specific branches in the network indicated an ancient time depth of differentiation of some of the maternal lineages of river buffalo breeds. The multidimensional display of breed pairwise FST values showed significant breed differentiation.
Present day river buffalo is the result of complex domestication processes involving more than one maternal lineage and a significant maternal gene flow from the wild populations after the initial domestication events. Our data are consistent with the available archaeological information in supporting the proposition that the river buffalo was likely to be domesticated in the Western region of the Indian subcontinent, specifically the present day breeding tracts of the Mehsana, Surati and Pandharpuri breeds.
The domestic water buffalo is a major source of meat, draught, hide and employment to the marginal farmers and landless labourers in many Asian countries. Broadly, water buffalo is of two types: 1) River buffalo- distributed in the Indian sub-continent, Middle-east and Eastern Europe. 2) Swamp buffalo- distributed in North-eastern parts of India, Bangladesh, China and South-east Asian countries . India has approximately ninety-eight million buffalo, primarily of the river type, representing fifty-six percent of the total world population. The importance of this species to the Indian dairy industry is immense; buffalo constitute 35% percent of the bovine population in India but they contribute more than 55% to the total milk production. There are at least nine well-defined breeds in India, representing approximately 30% of the total buffalo population of 90 million; the remaining animals are non-descript .
Mitochondrial genome is inherited through maternal lineage only, and unlike the nuclear genome there is a complete absence of genetic recombination in mtDNA. These two factors along with the comparative ease of genotyping of large number of individuals have meant that mtDNA polymorphisms have found tremendous usage in the evolutionary studies of maternal lineages of various species. Five to ten fold higher mutation rate of mtDNA control region as compared to that of single copy nuclear genes makes mtDNA control region extremely suitable for studying the process of derivation of domesticated animal stocks from their respective wild ancestors. Mitochondrial D-loop DNA sequences have provided significant insights into the domestication and past migration history of cattle [3–5], sheep , goat [7, 8] and pig . It has become increasingly clear that most of the livestock species have been domesticated more than once [5, 7, 10, 11]. Recently, it has been shown that the Indian river buffalo has been domesticated independent of the swamp buffalo [12, 13]. To analyse the population structure of the Indian river buffalo, and to understand the process of their domestication, we have analysed the mitochondrial D-loop region of 217 animals from the eight different breeds sampled from eight locations in India. We have also included in our analysis the published mtDNA D-loop sequences of the Mediterranean buffalo.
Mitochondrial DNA variation in Indian river buffalo breeds
Haplotype diversity of eight Indian buffalo breeds.
Number of Haplotypes
0.9563 ± 0.0213
0.9570 ± 0.0200
0.9943 ± 0.0119
0.9901 ± 0.0116
0.9619 ± 0.0302
0.9610 ± 0.0278
0.9972 ± 0.0111
0.9402 ± 0.0202
Reduced median network analysis of river buffalo
Dating of population expansion of Indian river buffalo
Reduced median network (Fig. 4) showed multiple and overlapping star-like appearances suggesting expansion of the corresponding haplotypes in the background of several singletons. The time depth of the expanding haplotypes in a reduced median network can be calculated using rho statistics . To estimate the time of expansion of some of the founding haplotypes of the river buffalo, we performed reduced median network for the hypervariable region I [see Additional file 1]. In this network, many of the expanding haplotypes that might have acted as nodes were interconnected through a single mutational step, thus making it difficult to estimate the time depth of their expansion. However, we could calculate the rho statistics for the minor lineage of river buffaloes represented by the R1 node (Fig. 4 & see Additional file 1) since the latter was isolated in the network. We obtained a rho value of 0.756 (95% confidence interval: 0.582 – 0.864) resulting into an expansion time of 6300 years BP using a mutation rate of 32% per nucleotide Myr-1.
Both the AMOVA and MDS display of FST values suggested a strong breed effect on the D-loop sequence variation. The MDS display based on the mitochondrial sequences was broadly reminiscent of the cluster structure of these breeds obtained from 27 microsatellite loci  with two notable exceptions. The microsatellite markers showed clustering of the Mehsana and Bhadawari breeds along with an admixture of the Murrah, Surati and Nagpuri breeds. However, in the present study the maternal lineage of the Mehsana breed stood out from the admixture and instead located itself along with the Jaffarabadi (Fig. 1). Similarly the maternal lineage of the Bhadawari breed tended to make its own cluster. There is an anecdotal evidence to suggest that the Mehsana breed has been an outcome of gene flow from the Murrah males in the recent past. That would explain one of the major differences in the clustering results obtained from the maternal and autosomal markers. Generally it is believed that the breed formation may be a very late activity with a low time depth vis-à-vis the process of domestication of a particular livestock species  and the breed differentiation may be the result of an intensive selection mainly operating through the paternal lineages. However, it was surprising to note strong breed effect on the mitochondrial variation (Fig. 1). A few breed specific branches in the network (Fig. 4) indicated an ancient time depth of differentiation of some of the maternal lineages of river buffalo breeds. It appears that the very concept of 'breed' in the river buffalo may not have the same connotation as in the case of modern breeds of cattle in the Western world [3, 4]. These results should have obvious implications in arriving at rational decisions aimed at conservation of buffalo genetic variability .
The phylogenetic analysis in the present study unveiled one main clade with six internal branches for the river buffalo. The Mediterranean haplotypes intermingled with the Indian buffalo haplotypes. This is consistent with a common origin of the Mediterranean and Indian domestic river buffalo. In reduced median network there was evidence in support of expansion from four nodes, out of which one node, namely R1, was far off from the remaining three expanding nodes. There were several minor branches and a large number of singleton haplotypes located far away from these nodes. Our phylogenetic and network results clearly demonstrated that the present day river buffalo are an outcome of a complex domestication process. Multiple domestication events appear to be a rule rather than an exception in livestock species [5, 10, 11]. For an example, horses have been domesticated from several wild populations at different locations and a few mitochondrial lineages of modern horse population are breed- specific . With the Indian buffalo, particularly the Mehsana breed, the situation is much more complicated because of the presence of several singleton haplotypes. It might be possible that a very large number of females with highly divergent mitochondrial sequences contributed to the domesticated stocks. Alternatively, there might have been a 'trickling in' effect in terms of continuous addition of females from the wild to the domestic herds over an extended period. The co-existence of the domestic and wild stocks in the same time and space, an essential requirement in favour of such a scenario, has been well known [14, 17].
Our estimate of the expansion time of one of the haplotypes was 6300 years BP using rho statistics. Water buffalo has been depicted on the Indus Valley civilization seals dated around the third millennium BC. This information has been used to suggest that buffalo was probably domesticated around that time in these areas . Such a proposition does not stand scrutiny. On the contrary, the form and context are more akin to these individuals being of the wild types. Wild buffalo remains have been recovered from ancient sites in Balochistan- Mehargarh in Pakistan and Santhli in North Gujarat . Buffalo remains dating around mid third millennium BC from Kutch-Dholavira, Gujarat in India are thought to be from the domestic buffalo as determined from the size differences between the Dholavira and Santhli/Mehargarh remains . These workers have argued that the suggested importance of milk and milk products during the Harappan times [19, 20] and the presence of domestic buffalo during this period are consistent with each other, implying that water buffalo might have already been the dairy animal in the Indus Valley civilization by then. Further, on the basis of size diminution of the buffalo from Dholavira, it has been suggested that the process of domestication of water buffalo was likely to be extended earlier than the Harappan period . The time estimate of expansion of at least one of the haplotypes of river buffalo (6300 years BP) in the present study is consistent with this suggestion of these authors.
We have earlier shown that the Indian river buffalo were domesticated independent of swamp buffalo . Our present study supports the following scenario of the river buffalo domestication. The Mediterranean and Indian domestic river buffalo have been derived from the same stocks through a complex process. During domestication and/or afterwards there might have been a continuous influx of maternal variability from the wild buffalo into the domestic stocks. The time of expansion of at least one of the several expanding haplotypes was estimated to be 6300 years BP. If the river buffalo was domesticated in the Indian subcontinent, as has been suggested by archaeological studies, the Western region represented by the present day breeding tract of the Mehsana, Surati and Pandharpuri breeds appears to be the most likely candidate region.
Sample collection, amplification and sequencing of mitochondrial DNA
Two hundred and seventeen river buffalo samples representing eight different breeds from Northern, Northwestern, Central and Southern India (Fig. 5) were used in this study. The sampling and sequencing protocol have been described in our earlier study .
Sequence alignment and population analyses
AUTOASSEMBLER (Perkin Elmer) and CLUSTALX programs  were used for sequence editing and alignment purpose respectively. Haplotype diversity, AMOVA and population pairwise differences (FST) were calculated using ARLEQUIN version 2.001 . The pair wise FST values were displayed by multidimensional scaling (MDS) using SPSS11.0. Isolation by distance (IBD) between breeds was examined by Mantel's tests  as implemented in IBD 2.1 program .
To construct phylogenetic tree, 135 D-loop haplotypes obtained from 217 Indian river buffalo sequences and 11 published haplotypes of Mediterranean buffalo were used. We considered a 945 bp fragment of the D-loop region for which sequences were available for the two types of river buffalo. Bos taurus (NCBI: accession no.: NC_006853) was used as the out-group. A maximum parsimony (MP) tree was constructed using MEGA 3.1 . The close-neighbour-interchange algorithm was chosen with a search level of three. The searches included 100 replications of random addition trees with 1000 bootstrapping. In addition, the reduced median network was applied to the dataset containing 228 sequences of river buffalo (Indian and Mediterranean) using NETWORK 126.96.36.199 program  with the parameters set to a weight of two and threshold value of one.
The Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi through a part of a research grant to the corresponding author supported this work. We thank Prof. M. L. Madan and Dr. V. K. Taneja for their help in arranging sample collection from the Nagpuri and Toda breeds, respectively.
- Cockrill WR: The water buffalo: a review. Brit Vet J. 1981, 137: 8-16.Google Scholar
- George M, Balaine DS, Vij PK, Kumar S: Conservation and management of buffalo genetic resources of India. Buffalo Production and Health. Edited by: Nagarcenkar R. 1988, ICAR, New Delhi, 31-37.Google Scholar
- Loftus RT, MacHugh DE, Bradley DG, Sharp PM, Cunningham P: Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 2757-2761. 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2757.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradley DG, MacHugh DE, Cunningham P, Loftus RT: Mitochondrial diversity and the origin of the African and European cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 5131-5135. 10.1073/pnas.93.10.5131.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beja-Pereira A, Caramelli D, Lalueza-Fox C, Vernesi C, Ferrand N, Casoli A, Goyache F, Royo LJ, Conti S, Lari M, Martini A, Ouragh L, Magid A, Atash A, Zsolnai A, Boscato P, Triantaphylidis C, Ploumi K, Sineo L, Mallegni F, Taberlet P, Erhardt G, Sampietro L, Bertranpetit J, Barbujani G, Luikart G, Bertorelle G: The origin of European cattle: evidence from modern and ancient DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 8113-8118. 10.1073/pnas.0509210103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loehr J, Worley K, Grapputo A, Carey J, Veitch A, Coltman DW: Evidence for cryptic glacial refugia from North American mountain sheep mitochondrial DNA. J Evol Biol. 2006, 19: 419-430. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01027.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luikart G, Giellly L, Excoffier L, Vigne JD, Bouuvet J, Taberlet P: Multiple maternal origins and weak phylogeographic structure in domestic goats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 5927-5932. 10.1073/pnas.091591198.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joshi MB, Rout PK, Mandal AK, Smith CT, Singh L, Thangaraj K: Phylogeography and origin of Indian domestic goats. Mol Biol Evol. 2004, 21: 454-462. 10.1093/molbev/msh038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giuffra E, Kijas JMH, Amarger V, Carlborg O, Jeon JT, Andersson L: The Origin of the domestic pig: Independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics. 2000, 154: 1785-1791.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jansen T, Forster P, Levine MA, Oelke H, Hurles M, Renfrew C, Weber J, Olek K: Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the domestic horse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 10905-10910. 10.1073/pnas.152330099.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G: DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4: 900-910. 10.1038/nrg1203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Nagarajan M, Sandhu JS, Kumar N, Behl V, Nishanth G: Mitochondrial DNA analyses of Indian water buffalo support a distinct genetic origin of river and swamp buffalo. Anim Genet. 2007, 38: 227-232. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01602.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lei CZ, Zhang W, Chen H, Lu F, Liu RY, Yang XY, Zhang HC, Liu ZG, Yao LB, Lu ZF, Zhao ZL: Independent maternal origin of Chinese swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim Genet. 2007, 38: 97-102. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01567.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Gupta J, Kumar N, Dikshit K, Navani N, Jain P, Nagarajan M: Genetic variation and relationships among eight Indian riverine buffalo breeds. Mol Ecol. 2006, 15: 593-600. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02837.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forster P, Harding R, Torroni A, Bandelt AJ: Origin and evolution of native American mtDNA variation: A reappraisal. Am J Hum Genet. 1996, 59: 935-945.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro B, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Wilson MC, Matheus PE, Sher AV, Pybus OG, Gilbert MTP, Barnes I, Binladen J, Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Baryshnikov GF, Burns JA, Davydov S, Driver JC, Froese DG, Harington CR, Keddie G, Kosintsev P, Kunz ML, Martin LD, Stephenson RO, Storer J, Tedford R, Zimov S, Cooper A: Rise and fall of the beringian steppe bison. Science. 2004, 306: 1561-1565. 10.1126/science.1101074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel AK, Meadow RH: The exploitation of wild and domestic water buffalo in prehistoric northwestern south Asia. Archaeology of the near east: Proceedings of the third international symposium on the archeozoology of the southwestern Asia and adjacent areas. Edited by: Buitenhuis HL, Bartosiewicz L, Choyke AM. 1998, ARC- publications, Groningen, The Netherlands, 180-199.Google Scholar
- Zeuner FE: A history of domesticated animals. London, Hutchinson. 1963Google Scholar
- Gouin P: Rapes, Jarres et faisselles: la production et l'exploration des produits laitiers dans l'Indus du 3e millenaire. Paleorient. 1990, 16: 37-54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gouin P: Cuillers harappeennes: technologie et interpretation. Paleorient. 1992, 18: 143-149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 24: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L: ARLEQUIN 2.0: A software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland. 2002Google Scholar
- Mantel NA: The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967, 27: 209-220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jensen JA, Bohonak J, Kelley SK: Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet. 2005, 6: 13-10.1186/1471-2156-6-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA 3.1: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5: 150-163. 10.1093/bib/5.2.150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Sykes BC, Richards MB: Mitochondrial portraits of human populations. Genetics. 1995, 141: 743-753.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.