Open Access

Yarrowia lipolytica vesicle-mediated protein transport pathways

BMC Evolutionary Biology20077:219

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-219

Received: 11 May 2007

Accepted: 12 November 2007

Published: 12 November 2007

Abstract

Background

Protein secretion is a universal cellular process involving vesicles which bud and fuse between organelles to bring proteins to their final destination. Vesicle budding is mediated by protein coats; vesicle targeting and fusion depend on Rab GTPase, tethering factors and SNARE complexes. The Génolevures II sequencing project made available entire genome sequences of four hemiascomycetous yeasts, Yarrowia lipolytica, Debaryomyces hansenii, Kluyveromyces lactis and Candida glabrata. Y. lipolytica is a dimorphic yeast and has good capacities to secrete proteins. The translocation of nascent protein through the endoplasmic reticulum membrane was well studied in Y. lipolytica and is largely co-translational as in the mammalian protein secretion pathway.

Results

We identified S. cerevisiae proteins involved in vesicular secretion and these protein sequences were used for the BLAST searches against Génolevures protein database (Y. lipolytica, C. glabrata, K. lactis and D. hansenii). These proteins are well conserved between these yeasts and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We note several specificities of Y. lipolytica which may be related to its good protein secretion capacities and to its dimorphic aspect. An expansion of the Y. lipolytica Rab protein family was observed with autoBLAST and the Rab2- and Rab4-related members were identified with BLAST against NCBI protein database. An expansion of this family is also found in filamentous fungi and may reflect the greater complexity of the Y. lipolytica secretion pathway. The Rab4p-related protein may play a role in membrane recycling as rab4 deleted strain shows a modification of colony morphology, dimorphic transition and permeability. Similarly, we find three copies of the gene (SSO) encoding the plasma membrane SNARE protein. Quantification of the percentages of proteins with the greatest homology between S. cerevisiae, Y. lipolytica and animal homologues involved in vesicular transport shows that 40% of Y. lipolytica proteins are closer to animal ones, whereas they are only 13% in the case of S. cerevisiae.

Conclusion

These results provide further support for the idea, previously noted about the endoplasmic reticulum translocation pathway, that Y. lipolytica is more representative of vesicular secretion of animals and other fungi than is S. cerevisiae.

Background

Yarrowia lipolytica is a hemiascomycetous dimorphic yeast, generally regarded as safe (GRAS), which has been used for biotechnological applications. It is able to produce large amounts of several metabolites such as citric acid and to secrete a variety of extracellular proteins (alkaline or acid proteases, RNase, lipases etc.) [1]. Its good protein secretion capacities have allowed the engineering of powerful heterologous protein expression systems [reviewed in [2]]. Y. lipolytica is also a conveniently tractable model organism, of which the secretion pathway was studied for several years in our laboratory [3]. We focused on the early steps of protein translocation in the endoplasmic reticulum [48], on the quality control of protein folding [9] and on the glycosylation pathway [10]. Several genes involved in these steps were cloned and analysed.

The results of the Génolevures II sequencing project of four hemiascomycetous yeasts [11] allowed us to search for proteins involved in the secretion pathway of Y. lipolytica and we compared them to the proteins of the three other yeasts, Candida glabrata, Kluyveromyces lactis and Debaryomyces hansenii. C. glabrata has become the second most common cause of candidiasis after Candida albicans. C. glabrata is not dimorphic, in contrast to other Candida species, and is phylogenetically closer to Saccharomyces cerevisiae [12]. K. lactis is less closely related to S. cerevisiae and has the capacity to grow on lactose as a sole carbon source, it has been used for industrial applications [13, 14]. D. hansenii is a cryotolerant marine yeast which grows at salinities up to 24%. D. hansenii is the most common yeast found in cheese and provides proteolytic and lipolytic activities during cheese ripening [15]. In this work, we first established the list of proteins, predicted from whole genome analysis, which are potentially involved in vesicular transport in Y. lipolytica. Candidates were identified through BLAST searches against S. cerevisiae protein sequences. We then search for homologues of these proteins in the predicted protein set encoded by the three other genomes. Among the differences observed, we noticed a number of plasma membrane SNARE proteins (three Ssop) in Y. lipolytica compared to the four other yeasts. S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata have two SSO genes whilst in K. lactis and D. hansenii, we detected only one gene. We finally focused on one specific feature of the Y. lipolytica secretory pathway, namely the existence of a Rab4-related protein. In mammalian cells, the GTP binding protein Rab4p is involved in the regulation of plasma membrane protein recycling [16]. A Rab4-related protein is also found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and in filamentous fungi such as Neurospora crassa, Aspergillus fumigatus or Phaenerochaete chrysosporium but is absent from S. cerevisiae, Candida albicans [17] and the three other hemiascomycetous yeasts. We constructed a strain of Y. lipolytica deleted for the RAB4 gene and analysed its phenotypic pattern.

Results and discussion

Vesicle-mediated protein transport pathways

The only membrane that a secretory protein must traverse is the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum, the transport of the protein to its final destination continues through vesicles which bud and fuse between organelles [for reviews: [18, 19]]. Vesicle budding is mediated by protein coats; vesicle targeting and fusion depend on Rab GTPase, tethering factors and SNARE complexes.

Vesicle budding

Protein coats (see Additional file 1)
Endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport

Endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport is mediated by the action respectively of the COPII and COPI coat complexes [[2023] for reviews]. The COPII coat is assembled on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and allows cargo selection and membrane budding [24]. The COPI complex is involved in retrieval of recycled proteins back to the endoplasmic reticulum [25]. COP I subunits could also have a role in vacuolar sorting [26].

COPII coat vesicles (see Additional file 2-1)

Vesicle budding is initiated by the activation of the GTPase Sar1p by the endoplasmic reticulum integral membrane guanine exchange factor Sec12p [27, 28]. Sar1p initiates membrane curvature [[29], for mammalian Sar1p see [30]]. The membrane-bound Sar1p-GTP recruits the heterodimer complex Sec23p-Sec24p. These pre-budding complexes are gathered by the Sec13p-Sec31p complex into nascent vesicles [see [31]: the mammalian Sec13p-Sec31p structure]. The Sec23p subunit activates the hydrolysis of GTP by Sar1p and reverses the assembly process. Sec16p stabilizes the coat against premature disassembly after Sar1p hydrolyses GTP [32]. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor the assembly and disassembly of COPII coat, it was suggested that a kinetically stable prebudding complex was maintained during multiple Sar1p GTPase cycles [33]. In S. cerevisiae, there are one Sec23p, one Sec23p-related protein, one Sec24p, two Sec24p-related proteins (Sfb2p and Sfb3p) and one Sec12p homologue (Sed4p). In Y. lipolytica and D. hansenii, all the COP II coat components are well conserved and we find two Sec23p-homologues, two Sec24p-homologues but no Sed4p proteins. In C. glabrata, there are two Sec23p-homologues, three Sec24p-homologues and two Sec13p-homologues and in K. lactis we found the same proteins as in S. cerevisiae with the exception of Sfb2p and Sed4p.

COP I coat vesicles (see Additional file 2-2)

The COP I coat assembles by the same process as COP II complex involving an Arfp-GTPase [for a review about Arf1p: [34]; mammalian Arf1p: [35]; mammalian COPI assembly review: [36]]. All the S. cerevisiae components are conserved in Y. lipolytica, though the Y. lopolytica Sec28p is only weakly related to the S. cerevisiae protein. In K. lactis, the Arf1 protein homologue was not identified but another Arf protein could play the role of Arf1p (see Additional file 2-12).

Post-Golgi transport

In the trans-Golgi network, the proteins are sorted to the plasma membrane, the endosomal/vacuolar system or recycled back from the endosome. Coated vesicle adaptors facilitate cargo selection [for reviews: [19, 37]].

Adaptor protein complex (see Additional file 2-3)

In S. cerevisiae, by homology to the mammalian adaptor protein (AP) subunit sequences, three potential heterotetrameric adaptor protein complexes have been identified [38]. Each complex is composed of two large (Aplp), one medium (Apmp) and one small (Apsp) subunits. The AP-1 complex is associated with clathrin-coated vesicles and is involved in retention of late Golgi membrane proteins [39] and trafficking to the vacuole [40]. This complex is alone able to associate with clathrin [38, 41]. Unlike the mammalian AP-2 complex which associates with endocytic clathrin-coated vesicles, the AP-2 complex of S. cerevisiae is apparently not involved in endocytosis. The AP-3 complex is involved in independent clathrin-coated vesicle transport of membrane proteins from Golgi to vacuoles [42]. In Y. lipolytica, we also identified three potential AP complexes. As in S. cerevisiae, two AP-1 medium subunits were found, but only two small subunits could be identified which could correspond to the AP-2 and AP-3 small subunits. The three other yeasts have the same set of proteins as S. cerevisiae for their adaptor protein complexes.

GGA proteins (Golgi-localized, γ ear-containing, ARF-binding proteins) (see Additional file 2-3)

GGA proteins are implicated in Golgi to endosomes clathrin-coated vesicle transport and bind to ubiquitin to facilitate this sorting [43, 44]. In S. cerevisiae, the GGA gene is duplicated but in the four yeasts studied, as in C. elegans and D. melanogater, there is only one gene: GGA2 which, evolutionary, is closer to the hypothetical common ancestor [45].

Synaptojanin-like protein (see Additional file 2-3)

The S. cerevisiae Inp53p, a synaptojanin-like protein acts together with the AP-1 complex in the Golgi to endosome clathrin-dependant pathway which is distinct from the direct Golgi to prevacuolar compartment mediated by GGA proteins [46].

Retromer complex (see Additional file 2-4) and sorting nexins (see Additional file 2-5)

Sorting nexins play a role in retrieval of proteins from the prevacuolar compartment or post-Golgi endosomes and different nexins operate in different classes of endosomes [reviewed in [4749]]. The sorting nexins Snx4p, Snx41p and Snx42p are required for the retrieval of the SNARE Snc1p from the post-Golgi endosome; Grd19p and the retromer complex are involved in the retrieval of endosomal SNARE Pep12p from the prevacuolar compartment [50]. The retromer complex consists of five proteins: Vps5p, Vps17p, two sorting nexins which form a dimer and associate with the complex formed by Vps26p, Vps29p and Vps35p [see [51, 52] for mammalian retromer complex structure].

Vesicle targeting and fusion

RabGTPase (see Additional file 3 and Additional file 2-6)
Rab proteins are small monomeric guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) which are membrane-associated and cycle between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound protein. These switches regulate all the steps in the secretion pathway. Mammalian Rab proteins belong to the Ras superfamily of GTPase. All the members of this superfamily have conserved nucleotide, phosphate and magnesium binding sequences but the Rab sequences can be distinguish by their C-terminal prenylation site and five Rab-specific regions (RabF) [53]. Pereira-Leal and Seabra [53] have also identified Rab subfamily specific regions (RabSF). They studied the evolution of the Rab family [54] and by their analysis, they observed that Rab proteins co-segregating in the phylogenetic trees showed a pattern of similar cellular localisation and/or function. In S. cerevisiae, Ypt1p, Ypt31p/32p and Sec4p are the essential Rab GTPases which regulate the exocytic pathway and Ypt6p, Ypt7p and Ypt51p/52p/53p are involved in the endocytic pathway. S. cerevisiae also has two other Rab GTPase, Ypt10p and Ypt11p which are also present in C. glabrata and we can find Ypt11p in K. lactis. Ypt10p seems to be involved in endocytic function and Ypt11p is required for endoplasmic reticulum inheritance [55]. In C. glabrata, a Ypt53p homologue could not be identified and in K. lactis it is Ypt32p which was not found. In Y. lipolytica, we can find homologues of the nine S. cerevisiae proteins necessary for the secretion pathway. Ypt10p and Ypt11p are absent but we can find two other Rab-related proteins, Rab2p and Rab4p as in the filamentous fungi [17]. The analysis of the phylogenic tree (Fig. 1) obtained after alignment of several human Rabp, S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica Yptp sequences revealed that human Rab1p, Rab2p, Rab4p, Rab5p and Rab11p cosegregate with Y. lipolytica proteins. As N. crassa [56] and other filamentous fungi, Y. lipolytica has a large protein secretion capacity and is able to switch from a yeast life cycle to a filamentous form in response to environmental conditions; in this latter form it needs a better capacity of secretion and of recycling plasma membrane material. In mammalian cells, Rab2p has been proposed to regulate the retrograde transport between the Golgi and the endoplasmic reticulum [57] and Rab4p is involved in the recycling of plasma membrane proteins [see [16, 58] for a review about recycling pathways]. The comparison of the mouse, rat, human, N. crassa, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Y. lipolytica sequences (Fig. 2 and Additional file 4) shows that the nucleotide, phosphate and magnesium binding regions, the RabF and RabSF sequences are well conserved. We also compared these Rab4p sequences with other proteins of the mammalian Ras superfamily (data not shown) and we identified a sequence GIQYG next to the RabSF4 region, and particularly the tyrosine residue only present in the Rab4p sequences. The analysis with the NetPhos program (CBS prediction server) identified this tyrosine as a potential phosphorylation site. We suggest that this tyrosine could be important in the regulation of Rab4p activity. In order to get more information about this filamentous fungi specificity, we analysed the effects of a deletion of the gene coding for the Y. lipolytica Rab4-related protein. This deletion showed only slight phenotypic changes. The aspect of the colony on rich medium plate was slightly different (Fig. 3). The ability to make the dimorphic transition was not impaired but at OD600 of 10, we quantified that the percentage of cells undergoing a dimorphic transition for the wild type strain was 74% and 38% for the mutant strain and the cells in the yeast form had a more spherical appearance in the mutant strain than in the wild type and aggregated more readily (Fig. 4). The round morphological aspect is also observed in the Y. lipolytica rac mutant, the Rac protein is another member of the Ras superfamily which is implicated in the induction of the hyphal growth [59]. The slight differences in the morphology of the mutant strains suggested a potential modification of the wall composition. This was confirmed by the increased sensitivity of the strain to calcofluor white (Fig. 5), implicating an increase in chitin composition of the wall. We also observed a decrease in the sensitivity to SDS (Fig. 5) suggesting a decrease in the porosity of the wall. These two events are also encountered when the genes coding for a heterotrimeric G-proteins of Aspergillus nidulans are mutated, these mutations in this filamentous fungus confer resistance to the antifungal plant PR-5 (Pathogenesis-Related) protein [60]. We suggest that the Y. lipolytica Rab4 protein could be important to recycle the receptor associated with a heterotrimeric G-protein. The mutant Y. lipolytica rab4 strains were able to produce diploids as well as the wild type strain (data not shown) indicating that the recycling of the pheromone receptor, associated with a G-protein, was not impaired. The Y. lipolytica Rab4p does not regulate endocytosis as the incorporation of FM4-64 was the same as the wild type strain compared to a sls2 mutant strain in which the FM4-64 incorporation is delayed (Fig. 6). Y. lipolytica Sls2p is homologous to the S. cerevisiae Rcy1p which plays a role in the recycling pathway (see "The vesicle-SNARE Snc1p recycling" section below).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of some human Rabp, S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica Yptp. "]" indicates when Y. lipolytica protein sequences are closer to human ones. The tree was obtained with ClustalX program, 1.81 version [177] and presented with Treeview program, 1.6.6 version [178].

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Ypt4p/Rab4p protein sequences alignment. The figure shows the upper quartile, for the full image, see Additional file 4. Mus musculus (Mm), Rattus norvegicus (Rn), Homo sapiens (Hs), Drosophila melanogaster (Dm), Neurospora crassa (Nc), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) and Yarrowia lipolityca (Yl) Ypt4/Rab4 protein sequences alignment was obtained with ClustalX program, 1.81 version [177] and presented with GeneDoc program, 2.6.002 version [179].

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Colony morphology of Y. lipolytica strains. Wild type (wt) and two independent clones of rab4Δ (-1,-5) strains were grown as isolated colonies on solid YPD rich medium. Observation (64×) of a five days culture by binocular microscopy.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Disruption of Y. lipolytica RAB4 gene does not impair hyphal growth but affects dimorphic transition. Microscope observation of the wild type (wt) and the mutant (rab4Δ) strains in liquid rich YPD medium exponential growth (OD600:2) and stationary phase (OD600:10).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

SDS and Calcofluor white sensitivity. The rab4Δ (-1,-5) mutant strains are more sensitive to calcofluor white (CW) and more resistant to SDS than the wild type (wt) strain.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Endocytosis in the rab4Δ mutant strain is not impaired. The incorporation of FM4-64 in the rab4Δ-5 mutant strain is the same as in the wild type (wt) strain compared to a sls2 mutant strain in which the FM4-64 incorporation is delayed. Y. lipolytica Sls2p is homologous to the S. cerevisiae Rcy1p which plays a role in the recycling pathway (see "The vesicle-SNARE Snc1p recycling" section). Low panel: Nomarski.

Regulation of Rab-GTPase [for reviews see [6164]]

Rab proteins cycle between cytosolic inactive GDP-bound form and active membrane associated GTP-bound form. The cytosolic form exists in a complex with a GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI). Post-translational prenylation of the protein is important for its activity and prenylated Rabp is recruited to the appropriate membrane by a GDI displacement factor (GDF) which catalyses the dissociation step. The nucleotide exchange is favoured by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF). GTP-bound Rabp is then activated and can interact with its effectors. The recycling of the Rab protein is stimulated by the GTPase activating protein (GAP) and the GDP-bound Rab protein is released from the membrane by GDI.

Prenylation [[65], see [66] for mammalian prenylation] (see Additional file 2-7)

Most of Rab proteins contain two C-terminal cysteine residues which are isoprenylated with two geranylgeranyl moieties. This reaction is catalyzed by geranylgeranyl transferase II (GGTase II), this enzyme has two subunits, a third subunit, Rab escort protein (REP), is a chaperone.

GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) (see Additional file 2-7)

Gdi1p recycles the Yptp/Sec4p proteins from their target membranes back to the vesicular pool [67].

GDI displacement factor (GDF) (see Additional file 2-7)

In vitro experiments with mammalian proteins identified that Yip3p catalyses the dissociation of endosomal Rab proteins from GDI [68]. The Yip family (Yip1p, Yip2p, Yip3p, Yip4p, Yip5p and Yif1p) are membrane proteins which interact with prenylated Rab proteins [69]. In S. cerevisiae, Yip1p has been identified through a two-hybrid screen as a protein interacting with Ypt1p and Ypt31p in their GDP form [70]. With a similar screen, Yif1p has been identified as a Yip1p-interacting protein [71]. These two proteins form an integral membrane complex that bind Ypt1p and is required for Golgi membrane fusion by interaction with the Golgi SNARE proteins [72]. Yos1p (Yip One Suppressor 1) associates with Yip1p-Yif1p complex [73]. This protein was only identified in D. hansenii.

Guanine exchange factor (GEF) (see Additional file 2-7)

The activation and membrane stabilisation of the Rab protein are accompanied by exchange of the GDP for the GTP, this activity being catalysed by the guanine exchange factor. Each GEF is specific for a Rab protein and seems to be recruited by the activated Rabp playing a role immediately upstream in the secretion pathway [74, 75]. The TRAPP I protein complex binds the COP II vesicles and activates Ypt1p by guanine exchange [76]. TRAPP II Trs120p-Trs130p subunits join the TRAPP I complex to switch the GEF activity from Ypt1p to Ypt31p-Ypt32p acting in late Golgi [77, 78]. Sec2p [see [79] for the crystal structure and 80 for the crystal structure of the Sec2p/Sec4p complex] is a highly efficient guanine exchange factor of Sec4p [81], the Rabp essential for exocytosis [[82], see [83] for Sec4p regulation cascade, [84] for Sec2p association with exocyst]. Vps9p is the Ypt51p GEF [85]. The Ric1/Rgp1p is the Ypt6p GEF [86], the BLAST against the S. cerevisiae proteins showed only one subunit in Y. lipolytica, Rgp1p, but by comparison with the D. hansenii protein we could identify a potential Y. lipolytica Ric1p. And Vps39p is the Ypt7p GEF [87].

GTPase activating protein (GAP) (see Additional file 2-7)

The recycling of the Rab protein is favoured by the GTPase activating protein. In S. cerevisiae, eight GTPase activating proteins have been identified and are not specific for one Rab protein in in vitro experiments (Gyp1p, Gyp6p, Gyp7p: [88]; Gyp2p, Gyp3p, Gyp4p: [89]; Gyp5p, Gyp8p: [90]). In the four yeasts, the Gyp3p homologue, Gyp4p was not identified. Gyl1p is Gyp-like protein interacting with Gyp5p involved in the control of polarized exocytosis [91], this protein has an homologue only in C. glabrata but not in the three other yeasts.

Tethering factors (see Additional file 5), [reviewed in [9294]]

The secretory vesicles are tethered to their target membrane by two classes of molecules: coiled-coil proteins able to form homodimeric complex as long as several times the diameter of the vesicle and large multisubunit complexes.

Endoplasmic reticulum-cis-Golgi-network

Several factors are involved in the tethering of vesicles to the Golgi, TRAPP complex (see Additional file 2-8), COG complex (see Additional file 2-9) and Uso1p (see Additional file 2-10). TRAPP is associated with the Golgi and two forms of the complex exist: TRAPP I (7 subunits) acts in the endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport and TRAPP II which contains the TRAPP I subunits together with three other proteins acts in Golgi traffic. In Y. lipolytica only two TRAPP II specific subunits were identified by comparison with the S. cerevisiae protein sequences but for the Trs65p we used the protein identified in D. hansenii to detect a potential Y. lipolytica protein. Both complexes are able to interchange guanine nucleotide on Ypt1p. In vitro, TRAPP I can bind COPII vesicles by binding the coat Sec23p subunit [95] and this could be the first event before interaction of the vesicle with its target [76]. The crystal structure of the mammalian Bet3p, the most conserved TRAPP protein, reveals a dimeric structure with hydrophobic channels and a covalent modification with a palmitate [96, 97], the crystallographic study of the complex Bet3p-Trs33p reveals specific interactions between these subunits [98]. This subunit could be responsible for the targeting and the anchoring in the Golgi membrane and could direct the other TRAPP components to the Golgi [96, 99]. Trs120p, a TRAPP II subunit, is required for vesicle traffic from the early endosome to the late Golgi [100]. Trs120p and Trs130p TRAPP II subunits are conserved from yeast to mammals; the Trs65p subunit is conserved only in some fungi and unicellular eukaryotes [101]. The other tethering factors, Uso1p, a long coiled-coil protein and the COG complex composed of eight subunits in S. cerevisiae are recruited before the last step of membrane fusion. Uso1p and the COG complex also have a function in sorting of endoplasmic reticulum-vesicles containing GPI-anchored proteins [see [102] for a review about differential ER exit] and in retrograde vesicular trafficking within the Golgi [reviewed in [103]]. The Uso1 protein consists of an N-terminal globular head region, a coiled-coil tail which mediates dimerisation and a C-terminal acidic region. The NCBI Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool has identified in the Y. lipolytica Uso1 protein the first two domains but not the C-terminal acidic region. When we compare the consensus sequence of this region with the Y. lipolytica sequence, only the last 50 residues of this domain are well conserved. The Saccharomyces cerecisiae and the mammalian COG complex are composed of eight subunits, a multiple of four subunits, as one the GARP and the exocyst complexes (see below), which could reflect an interaction with a four-component complex such as the trans SNARE complex [92]. In Y. lipolytica, only five subunits were identified as probable COG proteins by comparison with the S. cerevisiae proteins. Cog1p, Cog2p and Cog7p were not detected by BLAST searches but in mammals these proteins were identified by their function as their sequence similarity with the S. cerevisiae proteins is low [104]. Cog2p was found in D. hansenii and its sequence used to make the BLAST search with the Y. lipolytica proteins. This allowed the identification of a potential Y. lipolytica Cog2p homologue, but Cog1p and Cog7p were not found in Y. lipolytica, and in D. hansenii, Cog1p was not found. These proteins probably exist but should be identified by another means.

Cis-Golgi-network-Endoplasmic reticulum (see Additional file 2-11)

Dsl1p complex is a large complex composed of the peripheral endoplasmic reticulum membrane proteins Dsl1p, Dsl3p (Sec39p) and Tip20p [105, 106]. Dsl1p contains three domains, an N-terminal coiled-coil region of 200 aminoacids which interacts with Tip20p, a central highly acidic region of interaction with Ret2p and Ret1p (two COP I subunits) and a conserved C-terminal sequence which could recruit cytoskeletal elements [105]. The 200 amino acid N-terminus from the Dsl1p protein identified in Y. lipolytica does not align with the S. cerevisiae sequence. Nevertheless the Y. lipolytica sequence also contains potential coiled-coil regions (as determined by the coiled-coil prediction program, NPS@:Network Protein Sequence Analysis, [107]). The Tip20p sequence of Y. lipolytica has only 19 % identities with the S. cerevisiae sequence. This could explain the divergent N-terminal sequence of Dsl1p which is involved in the interaction of the two proteins. Dsl1p, Tip20p and Dsl3p are required for the stability of the SNARE complex at the endoplasmic reticulum [106].

Golgi

S. cerevisiae TRAPP II complex (see Additional file 2-8) is composed of ten subunits and could have a role in retrograde transport of Golgi vesicles [108]. The trs130 mutant (coding for a TRAPP II subunit) displays synthetic interaction with mutation in a COPI subunit (Ret2p) and a deletion of ARF1 (see Additional file 2-12) is implicated in COPI formation [108].

A role of the COG complex (see above) has also been found in retrograde transport to early Golgi vesicles [109].

The VFT/GARP complex (see Additional file 2-13) localizes to the trans-Golgi network and is required for retrograde traffic from early endosomes to the Golgi [110, 111]. The S. cerevisiae complex is composed of four subunits [112, 113], it is the effector of Ypt6p and interacts with the SNARE Tlg1p. Only three subunits were identified in Y. lipolytica and D. hansenii but the undetected Vps51p unit also has no homologue in mammalian [114] and seems to be a regulatory subunit [97] which could be replaced by another protein as suggested by Liewen, et al. [114]. The structural analysis of the interaction between S. cerevisiae Tlg1p and Vps51p has determined an N-terminal peptide of Vps51p which deletion does not block transport to the late Golgi from endosomes [115].

Golgins (see Additional file 2-10, -12) [reviewed in [116, 117]] are coiled-coil proteins which organize the structure and the trafficking pathways in the Golgi. These proteins have mainly been studied in mammalian cells but in Sacharomyces cerevisiae several homologues have been identified: Uso1p is the homologue of the mammalian p115 required for endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi transport; Grh1p, the GRASP65-homologue, a Golgi localized protein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint [118]; Imh1p, involved in transport between an endosomal compartment and the Golgi, Imh1p contains a Golgi-localization (GRIP) domain that interacts with activated Arl1p-GTP to be localized to the Golgi, this is regulated by Arl3p [[119, 120]] and Arl3p requires the N-terminal acetyltransferase NatC complex and the protein Sys1p to be targeted to the Golgi [121] [for a review about Arl proteins see [122]]; Coy1p, the CASP homologue, a Golgi membrane protein related to Giantin, its deletion in S. cerevisiae restores normal growth to cells lacking the SNARE Gos1p [123] and Rud3p, a golgin-160-related protein, is a Golgi matrix protein that is involved in the structural organization of the cis-Golgi [124].

Golgi-Endosome, Endosome-Vacuole [37]

The TRAPP II subunit Trs120p is required for vesicle traffic from early endosome to the late Golgi [100].

The Vps Class C/HOPS complex [reviewed in: [92, 125]) (see Additional file 2-14):

The HOPS complex composed of Vps11p, Vps18p, Vps16p, Vps41p with the protein Vps19p are the effectors of Ypt51p in endosomal traffic. In vacuolar transport, the complex seems to recruit the Rab Ypt7p GEF Vps39p which activates Ypt7p. Activated Ypt7p acts on the HOPS complex to promote tethering and binding to the SNARE Vam3p through the interaction with the SNARE-binding protein, Vps33p. Vps33p together with other HOPS complex subunits is found in complex with Vps8p, a hydrophilic membrane-associated protein [126]. HOPS complex binds phosphoinositides and SNARE Vam7p [127].

Golgi-Plasma Membrane
The Exocyst (see Additional file 2-15, -16)

The S. cerevisiae exocyst complex is composed of eight subunits (Sec3p, Sec5p, Sec6p, Sec8p, Sec10p, Sec15p, Exo70p and Exo84p), a quatrefoil complex as in the COG and the GARP complexes [92]. The activated Rab protein, Sec4p, present on the secretory vesicles, binds the exocyst subunit Sec15p in subcomplex with Sec10p resulting in the association with the other subunits and Sec3p [128]. Sec3p is the spatial landmark defining the sites of polarized exocytosis [129]. The localization of Sec3p is mediated by Rho GTPases, Rho1p [130] and Cdc42p [131]. Rho3p plays a role in exocytosis through its interaction with Exo70p ([132134]). These Rho proteins also have a role in actin polymerisation. Assembly of the exocyst occurs when the subcomplex associated with the vesicles joins Sec3p and Exo70p on the plasma membrane [135]. The Sec6p subunit dimerizes and interacts with the SNARE Sec9p, playing a role in SNARE complex regulation [136]. A cyclical regulatory network contributes to the establishment and maintenance of polarized cell growth [137]. Bem1p interacts with Sec15p and is involved in the Cdc42p-mediated polarity [138].

SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor Attachment protein REceptor) proteins [see reviews: [125, 17, 139141] for mammalian SNAREs] (see Additional file 6 and Additional file 2-17)

After the tethering of the vesicle close to its target membrane, the fusion of the membranes is initiated through the action of SM (Sec1/Munc18, see below) and SNARE proteins. SNARE proteins share one conserved sequence called the SNARE motif which contains 60–70 amino acids that include heptads repeat typical of coiled coils. They contain a C-terminal transmembrane domain or a hydrophobic post-translational modification motif. SNARE proteins associate to form complex undergoing conformational changes. Free SNARE motifs are unstructured and when they are associated in a complex they assemble into elongated four-helical bundles. SNAREs are present on the vesicle and the target membranes and the formation of the complex pulls the membrane close together. SNARE proteins are classified in to subfamilies based on a highly conserved layer of interacting amino acids (three glutamines: Qa-, Qb-, Qc-, one arginine: R-) in the centre of the helix bundle. All complexes contain one copy of each SNARE motif. In S. cerevisiae, twenty-four SNARE-encoding genes have been identified [reviewed in [139]]. Twenty-two of these genes could be found in Y. lipolytica by sequence homology. As in other fungi [17], Vam3p and Spo20p were not detected. Spo20p, which seems specific to S. cerevisiae (also not identified in the three other yeasts), contains both Qb and Qc SNARE motifs and is required during sporulation for the prospore membrane formation [142, 143]. Vam3p SNARE is required for homotypic vacuole fusion in S. cerevisiae and there is no homologue outside the Saccharomycetes, the Saccharomycetaceae, K. lactis, has a Vam3p SNARE, but in D. hansenii, another Saccharomycetaceae as in Y. lipolytica (Dipodascaceae) the Vam3 protein was not detected. The mitosporic Saccharomycetales, C. glabrata, possess a Vam3 protein. Pep12p is a late endosomal Qa SNARE with sequence similarity with Vam3p, that can complement vam3 mutants [144]. In Y. lipolytica and in D. hansenii, the BLAST searches allowed us to identify the Pep12p SNARE and another SNARE we propose to name Pep12p-like because its sequence is closer to Pep12p than to Vamp3p. This Pep12p-like SNARE could play the role of the S. cerevisiae Vam3p in both yeasts. A specificity of Y. lipolytica is the presence of three SSO genes resulting probably from gene triplication, and this seems unique to Y. lipolytica. The Sso proteins are implicated in the fusion of the secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane and S. cerevisiae Sso1p also has sporulation-specific functions [145]. The multiplicity of SSO genes in Y. lipolytica could reflect its good secretion capacity and its capacity to induce hyphal growth which needs better recycling of plasma membrane material. On the contrary, only one Sso protein (Sso2p) and one Snc protein (Snc2p) were found in K. lactis and D. hansenii. The SSO and SNC genes of K. lactis have been cloned by complementation in S. cerevisiae of sso2-1 and snc1Δ snc2Δ sem1Δ mutant strains. The K. lactis Ssop can perform both of the S. cerevisiae Ssop functions and the K. lactis Sncp seems to perform only the S. cerevisiae Sncp functions [146]. Sft1p was not detected in C. glabrata, Syn8p was not detected in C. glabrata and K. lactis and Nyv1p was not detected in D. hansenii.

Regulation of fusion
The Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins (see Additional file 2-18) [reviewed in [147]]

The SM proteins confer specificity to membrane fusion through their binding to the N-terminal domain of the Qa SNARE protein. Four SM proteins have been found in S. cerevisiae, Sly1p acting between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi [148] and Sec1 at the final step of exocytosis, Vps45p and Vps33p playing a role between Golgi and endosomes and between endosomes and vacuole. Each SM protein can bind several Qa SNARE but also other SNARE implicated in the same complex, as has been shown for Sly1p [149]. In addition one SNARE can bind two SM proteins at the same organelle: Vps45p and Vps33p with Pep12p [126]. Mso1p, a Sec1p-interacting protein, binds to SNARE complex and plays an essential role for vesicle fusion during prospore membrane formation [150, 151].

Vsm1p (see Additional file 2-19)

The phosphorylation of SNAREs by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) regulates their ability to assemble into functional complexes [152, 153]. Phosphorylation of the Sed5p t-SNARE regulates endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi transport as well as Golgi morphology [154]. The Ssop phosphorylation allows the binding of Vsm1p, a negative regulator of secretion which prevents the formation of the SNARE complex [155]. Dephosphorylation of Ssop by ceramide activated protein phosphatase (CAPP) increases its ability to form a complex with Sec9p [152]. Three S. cerevisiae genes code for a PKA but only one gene could be identified in Y. lipolytica and D. hansenii and two were identified in C. glabrata and K. lactis. The CAPP is composed of two regulatory subunits (Tpd3p and Cdc55p) and one catalytic subunit (Sit4p) which were found by sequence homology in the four yeasts in addition to further one Tpd3p-like in C. glabrata.

SNARE recycling

SNARE complex dissociation (see Additional file 2-20):

After the membrane fusion step, the trans-SNARE complex becomes a cis-SNARE complex whose dissociation requires the ATPase Sec18p and the soluble NSF-attachment protein (Sec17p) as cofactor [156, 157]. In vacuole fusion, Sec17p may displace HOPS from SNAREs to permit subsequent rounds of fusion [158]. Two Sec18 proteins were detected in C. glabrata.

The vesicle-SNARE Snc1p recycling (see Additional file 2-20)

The S. cerevisiae RCY1 gene has been identified with a screen for mutants affected in membrane traficking along the endocytic pathway [159]. Rcy1p contains an amino-terminal F box and a CAAX box motif in its carboxyl-terminal sequence. The F box region of the protein is required for the recycling of the vesicle-SNARE Snc1p. The CAAX box is required for its localization in polar growth regions. Rcy1p interacts with Skp1p through the F box motif and both proteins form a complex necessary for the recycling function [160]. Rcy1p is a positive regulator of Ypt6p [161]. Gyp1p, the Ypt1p GTPase activator is also involved in the recycling of Snc1p [162], as well as Snx4p, Snx41p and Snx42p [43]. The ARF-GAP Gcs1p facilitates the incorporation of the Snc1p into COPI recycling vesicles [163]. Rcy1p is a downstream effector of Ypt31, 32p [164].

In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pof6p, the Rcy1p-homologue, has been identified through a two-hybrid interaction with Skp1. Both proteins are required for normal septum processing and cell separation [165], a function which may also require the exocyst function [166].

Previous to these works, a mutation sls2-1, was isolated in Y. lipolytica that causes synthetic lethality when combined with the conditional lethal mutation in the 7S RNA of the signal recognition particle [167]. Rcy1p and Pof6p are the homologues of Sls2p.

Conclusion

The sequencing of four hemiascomycetous yeasts has allowed us to search for proteins involved in vesicular transport by comparison with proteins identified in S. cerevisiae. The method used does not allow the identification of a protein which does not exist in S. cerevisiae or does not belong to a protein family. To identify new candidates, a list from other organism should be established or experimental approach should be performed. The proteins identified are highly conserved between the five yeasts but we have brought to light several specificities of Y. lipolytica in keeping with its good protein secretion capacities and its dimorphic aspect. In Table 1, we summarize these differences. Some of the proteins for which we did not find homologues have probably a too divergent sequence to be identified through the BLAST searches and may be identified in the future by functional screens. But, the presence of Rab2p- and Rab4p-related proteins as is found in fungi, a potential role of Rab2-related protein and Ypt1p in vesicular transport between endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi and of Rab4-related protein in addition to Sls2p/Rcy1p in membrane recycling reflect the greater complexity of the Y. lipolytica secretion pathway, which is probably dictated by the necessity to secrete and recycle membrane material needed for its filamentous growth. In this work, we have shown that the Rab4p-related protein could have a role in this membrane recycling since a modification of the aspect of the colony, the decrease of the number of cells undergoing dimorphic transition and the change of the wall permeability of the rab4 deleted strain were observed. The three Sso proteins are also indicative of a large secretion capacity and a study of this specificity would be interesting. As previously shown through the diverse studies of Y. lipolytica, this dimorphic yeast has a secretion pathway closer to the mammalian one than has S. cerevisiae. Its translocation apparatus is largely devoted to the co-translational translocation of nascent peptides through the endoplasmic reticulum membrane as is seen in mammalian cells. C. glabrata and K. lactis are the closest to S. cerevisiae for the proteins listed. We found among the C. glabrata proteins, 2 COPII coat protein Sec13p-homologues and 2 Sec18p-homologues implicated in the SNARE recycling and this seems to be specific to this yeast. For K. lactis and D. hansenii, only one Ssop and one Sncp were detected. Though D. hansenii is classified in Saccharomycetaceae, as is S. cerevisiae, and Y. lipolytica is a Dipodascacae, these two yeasts seem closer at least for the proteins involved in vesicular transport. These results are in agreement with the phylogenetic tree presented by Dujon et al [11]. In Fig. 7a, we have shown the proportion of the 165 Y. lipolytica protein sequences listed (see Additionnal file 2: Y. lipolytica column) with the greatest homology to S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata, K. lactis, D. hansenii, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, N. crassa, other fungi, animals and plants sequences (see Additional file 7). 72% of these proteins are closest to fungi and N. crassa. If we exclude animals, plants and fungi (keeping only N. crassa) from this search (Fig. 7b), we observed that 52% of the Y. lipolytica proteins listed are closer to N. crassa. The last comparison is performed without N. crassa (Fig. 7c): in this case, 40% of the proteins are closer to D. hansenii. This could reflect their common physiology, the filamentous growth and good secretion ability for Y. lipolytica and N. crassa and their proteolytic and lipolytic activities and high salt tolerance [168] for Y. lipolytica and D. hansenii. These results confirm that considering the identified proteins playing a role in vesicular transport, Y. lipolytica is closer to the fungi than to S. cerevisiae. The proteins that are the best conserved between S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica, are the SNARE proteins (see Additional file 7). In Fig. 8a, we have presented the percentage of the Y. lipolytica proteins with the greatest homology to the S. cerevisiae and animal: 40% of these proteins are closer to the animal ones, particularly, proteins of the AP complexes, Ypt and Arf proteins, TRAPP and HOPS complexes (see Additional file 7), whereas for S. cerevisiae, only 13% of these proteins are closer to animals than to Y. lipolytica (Fig. 8b, see Additional file 8). Koumandou and coworkers [169] have analysed the protein sequences of tethering complexes and SM proteins from five eukaryotic supergroups. They conclude that the most recent common eukaryotic ancestor had a complex endomembrane system with COG, Exocyst, Dsl1, GARP tethering complexes which could have originated from one common ancestral complex, TRAPP and HOPS complexes which are independently derived and all four SM protein families represented. The phylogenetic tree presented by Dujon et al [11] indicates that Y. lipolytica may be less distant from the last common eukaryotic ancestor and the observation of a good sequence conservation between Y. lipolytica and animal TRAPP and HOPS subunits for example, suggests that these complexes are required for the evolution of multicellular organisms. Similarly, Hall et al. [170] showed that Rab4p was an ancient component of the endomembrane trafficking system since it exists, and its recycling function is conserved, in Trypanosoma brucei which belongs to an eukaryotic supergroup separated from that of yeast, fungi and animals. In Y. lipolytica also, the presence and the possible recycling role of a Rab4-like protein was observed while in S. cerevisiae and in the three other hemiascomycetous yeasts, this protein has been lost. These observations indicate that S. cerevisiae has diverged further from the last common eukaryotic ancestor than has Y. lipolytica, as far as vesicle-mediated protein transport pathways are concerned and that Y. lipolytica has retained the complexity of the trafficking system allowing evolution to a multicellular organization. So as has been said for fungi [171], we can say that «Yarrowia lipolytica and humans are closer than you think» and that this yeast constitutes an interesting model to study the secretion pathway.
Table 1

Differences observed for the five hemiascomycetous yeasts.

 

S. cerevisiae

Y. lipolytica

C. glabrata

K. lactis

D. hansenii

COPII

Sec24p, Sfb2,3p (Sec24p-related)

2 proteins

3 proteins

2 proteins

2 proteins

 

Sec13p

1 protein

2 proteins

1 protein

1 protein

 

Sed4p

no hits

1 protein

no hits

no hits

Adaptor

Aps1,2,3p

2 proteins

3 proteins

3 proteins

3 proteins

 

Gga1,2p

1 protein (Gga2p)

1 protein (Gga2p)

1 protein (Gga2p)

1 protein (Gga2p)

Sorting Nexin

Snx41,42p

1 protein

2 proteins

2 proteins

2 proteins

Yptp

Ypt7p

1 protein

1 protein

1 protein

2 proteins

 

Ypt10p

no hits

1 protein

no hits

no hits

 

Ypt11p

no hits

1 protein

1 protein

no hits

 

Ypt31-32p

2 proteins

2 proteins

1 protein (Ypt31p)

1 protein (Ypt32p)

 

Ypt51,52,53p

3 proteins

2 proteins

3 proteins

3 proteins

 

no hits

Rab2,4p-related

no hits

no hits

no hits

Yptp regulation

Yos1p

no hits

no hits

no hits

1 protein

 

Gyp4p

no hits

no hits

no hits

no hits

 

Gyl1p

no hits

1 protein

no hits

no hits

COG complex

Cog1p

no hits

1 protein

1 protein

no hits

 

Cog2p

1 protein

1 protein

1 protein

1 protein

 

Cog7p

no hits

1 protein

1 protein

1 protein

Arfp

Arf1,2,3p

2 proteins(Arf1,3p)

2 proteins(Arf1,2p)

2 proteins (Arf2,3p)

3 proteins

 

Arl1p

2 proteins

1 protein

1 protein

1 protein

Arl3p localization

NatC complex (3 proteins)

2 proteins

3 proteins

3 proteins

3 proteins

GARP complex

Vps51p

no hits

1 protein

1 protein

no hits

SNARE-Qa

Vam3p

Pep12p-like

1 protein

1 protein

Pep12p-like

 

Sso1,2p

3 proteins

2 proteins

1 protein (Sso2p)

1 protein (Sso2p)

SNARE-Qb,Qc

Spo20p

no hits

no hits

no hits

no hits

SNARE-Qc

Sft1p

1 protein

no hits

1 protein

1 protein

 

Syn8p

1 protein

no hits

no hits

1 protein

SNARE-R

Nyv1p

1 protein

1 protein

1 protein

no hits

 

Snc1,2p

2 proteins

2 proteins

1 protein (Snc2p)

1 protein (Snc2p)

Exocytosis SNARE regulation proteins

Tpd3p (CAPP regulatory subunit)

1 protein

2 proteins

1 protein

1 protein

 

Tpk1,2,3p (PKA)

1 protein

2 proteins

2 proteins

1 protein

SNARE recycling

Sec18p

1 protein

2 proteins

1 protein

1 protein

See Additional file 2 for the list of proteins potentially implicated in vesicular transport.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

The percentage of Y. lipolytica proteins with the greatest homology: a: to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata, Kluyveromyces lactis, Debaryomyces hansenii, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Neurospora crassa, other fungi, animals, plants proteins; b: to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata, Kluyveromyces lactis, Debaryomyces hansenii, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Neurospora crassa proteins; c: to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata, Kluyveromyces lactis, Debaryomyces hansenii, Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins. See Additional file 7 for the list of E-values obtained with BLAST of Y. lipolytica proteins against NCBI eukaryotic sequences.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-7-219/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_510_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Percentages of greatest homology. a: The percentage of Y. lipolytica proteins with the greatest homology to S. cerevisiae and animal proteins; b: The percentage of S. cerevisiae proteins with the greatest homology to Y. lipolytica and animal proteins. See Additional file 8 for the list of E-values obtained with BLAST of the S. cerevisiae proteins against NCBI eukaryotic protein sequences.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

Escherichia coli strains DH5alpha (F'/end A1 hsd R17 (rK- mK+) sup E44 thi-1 rec A1 gyr A (Nalr) rel A1 Δ (lac IZYA-arg F) U 169deo R (φ 80dlac Δ (lac Z)M15) was used as host strain for bacterial transformations and plasmid propagation.

The Yarrowia lipolytica strain INAG136463 (MatB, scr1 : : ADE1, SCR2, his-1, leu-2, ura3) was used for the inactivation of RAB4-related gene.

Escherichia coli cells were grown in LB medium (1% bactotryptone, 1% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl), 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 37°C. Yarrowia lipolytica cells were cultivated either on rich YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 1% bactopeptone, 1% glucose), 28°C, or on minimal medium: 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco laboratories), 2% glucose as carbon source, 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 28°C with amino acids required and 1,25 mg/ml 5'-fluoroorotic acid for ura3- strain selection.

Gene inactivation

Disruption was performed using the two-step «pop-in/pop-out» method [172]. The disrupted gene was obtained by the deletion of the Bst EII-Cla I fragment of the RAB4-related gene cloned between the Hind III-Kpn I sites of the p0 vector [173].

DNA techniques

Standard techniques were used according to Sambrook et al. [174]. Enzymes were supplied by New England Biolabs. All vectors inserts were checked by sequencing by Genome express (France).

Transformation procedures

The E. coli strains were transformed by the method of Chung and Miller [175].Y. lipolytica strain transformations were carried out according to Xuan et al. [176].

Sensitivity to SDS and Calcofluor White

Cells of the INAG136463 (wt) and two clones (1, 5) of the deleted rab4-related strains were grown in YPD medium. 5 μl droplets of serial dilutions of exponential growing cultures of each strain were inoculated on the surface of YPD plates containing 2.5 μg/ml, 5 μg/ml, 10 μg/ml Calcofluor White (CW) or 0.0075 %, 0.015%, 0.03% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).

FM4-64 staining

For the strains of yeast cells, 3 OD600 units of exponential growth in YPD medium (OD600 0.5–1) were resuspended in 150 μl of YPD containing 40 μM FM4-64. Cells were incubated 10 min. at 28°C and washed three times in ice-cold medium. Cells were resuspended in YPD and incubated at 28°C. Aliquots were taken at various times and internalization was stopped with 10 mM NaN3 and 10 mM NaF. Stained cells were visualized using fluorescence optics [adapted from [159]].

Informatic analyses

Hemiascomycetous yeast genome sequences, BLAST searches of vesicular secretion proteins and BLAST results (performed Apr 25, 2003 with 1,093,702 sequences) were obtained from the Génolevures web site [180]. S. cerevisiae sequences were collected from Saccharomyces Genome Database [181]. BLASTs against protein databases were obtained from NCBI (BLAST with 4,554,902 sequences) [182] and Infobiogen web site [183]. Protein analyses were done with NCBI Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool [184], ExPASy Proteomics tools [185] and CBS Prediction Servers [186].

A list of proteins implicated in S. cerevisiae vesicular secretion was made from literature. These S. cerevisiae protein sequences were used for BLAST searches with the Génolevures web site. For protein families such as Rab protein, autoBLAST, which means BLAST of a sequence against its own genome, were made to identify all the members of the family. The protein sequences of the new members were identified by BLAST searches against the NCBI eukaryotic protein sequences.

The percentages of proteins with the greatest homology (Fig. 7 and 8) were determined by quantification of the best E-values obtained with the BLAST searches against the NCBI eukaryotic protein sequences.

Abbreviations

Y. lipolytica

Yl Yarrowia lipolytica:

C. glabrata

Cg Candida glabrata:

K. lactis

Kl Kluyveromyces lactis:

D. hansenii

Dl Debaryomyces hansenii:

S. cerevisiae

Sc Saccharomyces cerevisiae:

N. crassa

Nc Neurospora crassa:

SNARE: 

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor Attachment protein Receptor.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by INRA, CNRS and AgroParisTech. We gratefully thank R. Haguenauer-Tsapis and J.-M. Galan from Institut Jacques Monod-CNRS (France) for helpful discussions about membrane protein recycling. We thank C.R. Tinsley for the copyediting of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaire INRA-CNRS-AgroParisTech UMR 1238 CBAI

References

  1. Barth G, Gaillardin C: Physiology and genetics of the dimorphic fungus Yarrowia lipolytica. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997, 19: 219-37. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00299.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Madzak C, Gaillardin C, Beckerich JM: Heterologous protein expression and secretion in the non-conventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: a review. J Biotechnol. 2004, 109: 63-81. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckerich JM, Boisramé A, Gaillardin C: Yarrowia lipolytica : a model organism for protein secretion studies. Int Microbiol. 1998, 1: 123-130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Broughton J, Swennen D, Wilkinson BM, Joyet P, Gaillardin C, Stirling CJ: Cloning of SEC61 homologues from Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica reveals the extent of functional conservation within this core component of the ER translocation machinery. J Cell Sci. 1997, 110: 2715-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Swennen D, Joyet P, Gaillardin C: Cloning the Yarrowia lipolytica homologue of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SEC62 gene. Curr Genet. 1997, 31: 128-32. 10.1007/s002940050186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boisrame A, Kabani M, Beckerich JM, Hartmann E, Gaillardin C: Interaction of Kar2p and Sls1p is required for efficient co-translational translocation of secreted proteins in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 30903-8. 10.1074/jbc.273.47.30903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kabani M, Beckerich JM, Gaillardin C: Sls1p stimulates Sec63p-mediated activation of Kar2p in a conformation-dependent manner in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 6923-34. 10.1128/MCB.20.18.6923-6934.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boisrame A, Chasles M, Babour A, Beckerich JM, Gaillardin C: Sbh1p, a subunit of the Sec61 translocon, interacts with the chaperone calnexin in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 4947-56. 10.1242/jcs.00187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Babour A, Beckerich JM, Gaillardin C: Identification of an UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast. 2004, 21: 11-24. 10.1002/yea.1051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnay-Verdier S, Boisramé A, Beckerich JM: Identification and characterization of two alpha-1,6-mannosyltransferases, Anl1p and Och1p, in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Microbiology. 2004, 150: 2185-95. 10.1099/mic.0.26887-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S, Lafontaine I, De Montigny J, Marck C, Neuveglise C, Talla E, Goffard N, Frangeul L, Aigle M, Anthouard V, Babour A, Barbe V, Barnay S, Blanchin S, Beckerich JM, Beyne E, Bleykasten C, Boisrame A, Boyer J, Cattolico L, Confanioleri F, De Daruvar A, Despons L, Fabre E, Fairhead C, Ferry-Dumazet H, Groppi A, Hantraye F, Hennequin C, Jauniaux N, Joyet P, Kachouri R, Kerrest A, Koszul R, Lemaire M, Lesur I, Ma L, Muller H, Nicaud JM, Nikolski M, Oztas S, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O, Pellenz S, Potier S, Richard GF, Straub ML, Suleau A, Swennen D, Tekaia F, Wesolowski-Louvel M, Westhof E, Wirth B, Zeniou-Meyer M, Zivanovic I, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Thierry A, Bouchier C, Caudron B, Scarpelli C, Gaillardin C, Weissenbach J, Wincker P, Souciet JL: Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature. 2004, 430: 35-44. 10.1038/nature02579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fidel PL, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD: Candida glabrata : review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to Candida. albicans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 80-96.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schaffrath R, Breunig KD: Genetics and molecular physiology of the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Fungal Genet Biol. 2000, 30: 173-90. 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Toffano-Nioche C, Artiguenave F, Duchateau-Nguyen G, Lemaire M, Marmeisse R, Montrocher R, Robert C, Termier M, Wincker P, Wesolowski-Louvel M: Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 11. Kluyveromyces lactis. FEBS Lett. 2000, 487: 66-70. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02282-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lepingle A, Casaregola S, Neuveglise C, Bon E, Nguyen H, Artiguenave F, Wincker P, Gaillardin C: Genomic exploration of thehemiascomycetous yeasts: 14. Debaryomyces hansenii var. hansenii. FEBS Lett. 2000, 487: 82-6. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02285-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. van der Sluijs P, Hull M, Webster P, Male P, Goud B, Mellman I: The small GTP-binding protein rab4 controls an early sorting event on the endocytic pathway. Cell. 1992, 70: 729-40. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90307-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta GD, Brent Heath I: Predicting the distribution, conservation, and functions of SNAREs and related proteins in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2002, 36: 1-21. 10.1016/S1087-1845(02)00017-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bonifacino JS, Glick BS: The mechanisms of vesicle budding and fusion. Cell. 2004, 116: 153-66. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01079-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson MS: Adaptable adaptors for coated vesicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14: 167-74. 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.02.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mancias JD, Goldberg J: Exiting the endoplasmic reticulum. Traffic. 2005, 6: 278-85. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00279.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang BL, Wang Y, Ong YS, Hong W: COPII and exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 293-303. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.02.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Watson P, Stephens DJ: ER-to-Golgi transport: form and formation of vesicular and tubular carriers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 304-15. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.03.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurkan C, Stagg SM, Lapointe P, Balch WE: The COPII cage: unifying principles of vesicle coat assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 727-38. 10.1038/nrm2025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Barlowe C, Orci L, Yeung T, Hosobuchi M, Hamamoto S, Salama N, Rexach MF, Ravazzola M, Amherdt M, Schekman R: COPII: a membrane coat formed by Sec proteins that drive vesicle budding from the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 1994, 77: 895-907. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90138-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Letourneur F, Gaynor EC, Hennecke S, Demolliere C, Duden R, Emr SD, Riezman H, Cosson P: Coatomer is essential for retrieval of dilysine-tagged proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 1994, 79: 1199-207. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90011-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gabriely G, Kama R, Gerst JE: Involvement of specific COPI subunits in protein sorting from the late endosome to the vacuole in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 526-40. 10.1128/MCB.00577-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Barlowe C, Schekman R: SEC12 encodes a guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor essential for transport vesicle budding from the ER. Nature. 1993, 365: 347-9. 10.1038/365347a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Futai E, Hamamoto S, Orci L, Schekman R: GTP/GDP exchange by Sec12p enables COPII vesicle bud formation on synthetic liposomes. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 4146-55. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600428.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee MC, Orci L, Hamamoto S, Futai E, Ravazzola M, Schekman R: Sar1p N-terminal helix initiates membrane curvature and completes the fission of a COPII vesicle. Cell. 2005, 122: 605-17. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bielli A, Haney CJ, Gabreski G, Watkins SC, Bannykh SI, Aridor M: Regulation of Sar1 NH2 terminus by GTP binding and hydrolysis promotes membrane deformation to control COPII vesicle fission. J Cell Biol. 2005, 171: 919-24. 10.1083/jcb.200509095.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stagg SM, Gurkan C, Fowler DM, LaPointe P, Foss TR, Potter CS, Carragher B, Balch WE: Structure of the Sec13/31 COPII coat cage. Nature. 2006, 439: 234-8. 10.1038/nature04339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Supek F, Madden DT, Hamamoto S, Orci L, Schekman R: Sec16p potentiates the action of COPII proteins to bud transport vesicles. J Cell Biol. 2002, 158: 1029-38. 10.1083/jcb.200207053.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sato K, Nakano A: Dissection of COPII subunit-cargo assembly and disassembly kinetics during Sar1p-GTP hydrolysis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005, 12: 167-74. 10.1038/nsmb893.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Donaldson JG, Honda A, Weigert R: Multiple activities for Arf1 at the Golgi complex. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 364-73. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.03.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. D'Souza-Schorey C, Chavrier P: ARF proteins: roles in membrane traffic and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 347-58. 10.1038/nrm1910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Liu W: Insights into COPI coat assembly and function in living cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16: e1-4. 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.08.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bowers K, Stevens TH: Protein transport from the late Golgi to the vacuole in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 438-54. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.04.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeung BG, Phan HL, Payne GS: Adaptor complex-independent clathrin function in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1999, 10: 3643-59.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Valdivia RH, Baggott D, Chuang JS, Schekman RW: The yeast clathrin adaptor protein complex 1 is required for the efficient retention of a subset of late Golgi membrane proteins. Dev Cell. 2002, 2: 283-94. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00127-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Phelan JP, Millson SH, Parker PJ, Piper PW, Cooke FT: Fab1p and AP-1 are required for trafficking of endogenously ubiquitylated cargoes to the vacuole lumen in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 2006, 119: 4225-34. 10.1242/jcs.03188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yeung BG, Payne GS: Clathrin interactions with C-terminal regions of the yeast AP-1 beta and gamma subunits are important for AP-1 association with clathrin-coats. Traffic. 2001, 2: 565-76. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.20806.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Vowels JJ, Payne GS: A dileucine-like sorting signal directs transport into an AP-3-dependent, clathrin-independent pathway to the yeast vacuole. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 2482-93. 10.1093/emboj/17.9.2482.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott PM, Bilodeau PS, Zhdankina O, Winistorfer SC, Hauglund MJ, Allaman MM, Kearney WR, Robertson AD, Boman AL, Piper RC: GGA proteins bind ubiquitin to facilitate sorting at the trans-Golgi network. Nat Cell Biol. 2004, 6: 252-9. 10.1038/ncb1107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakayama K, Takatsu H: Analysis of Arf interaction with GGAs in vitro and in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 404: 367-77. 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)04032-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Boehm M, Bonifacino JS: Adaptins: the final recount. Mol Biol Cell. 2001, 12: 2907-20.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ha SA, Torabinejad J, DeWald DB, Wenk MR, Lucast L, De Camilli P, Newitt RA, Aebersold R, Nothwehr SF: The synaptojanin-like protein Inp53/Sjl3 functions with clathrin in a yeast TGN-to-endosome pathway distinct from the GGA protein-dependent pathway. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 1319-33. 10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0686.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Worby CA, Dixon JE: Sorting out the cellular functions of sorting nexins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 3: 919-31. 10.1038/nrm974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Carlton J, Bujny M, Rutherford A, Cullen P: Sorting nexins – unifying trends and new perspectives. Traffic. 2005, 6: 75-82. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00260.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Seaman MN: Recycle your receptors with retromer. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15: 68-75. 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.12.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hettema EH, Lewis MJ, Black MW, Pelham HR: Retromer and the sorting nexins Snx4/41/42 mediate distinct retrieval pathways from yeast endosomes. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 548-57. 10.1093/emboj/cdg062.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Seaman MN, McCaffery JM, Emr SD: A membrane coat complex essential for endosome-to-Golgi retrograde transport in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1998, 142: 665-81. 10.1083/jcb.142.3.665.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shi H, Rojas R, Bonifacino JS, Hurley JH: The retromer subunit Vps26 has an arrestin fold and binds Vps35 through its C-terminal domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006, 13: 540-8. 10.1038/nsmb1103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pereira-Leal JB, Seabra MC: The mammalian Rab family of small GTPases: definition of family and subfamily sequence motifs suggests a mechanism for functional specificity in the Ras superfamily. J Mol Biol. 2000, 301: 1077-87. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pereira-Leal JB, Seabra MC: Evolution of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins. J Mol Biol. 2001, 313: 889-901. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Buvelot Frei S, Rahl PB, Nussbaum M, Briggs BJ, Calero M, Janeczko S, Regan AD, Chen CZ, Barral Y, Whittaker GR, Collins RN: Bioinformatic and comparative localization of Rab proteins reveals functional insights into the uncharacterized GTPases Ypt10p and Ypt11p. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 7299-317. 10.1128/MCB.02405-05.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Borkovich KA, Alex LA, Yarden O, Freitag M, Turner GE, Read ND, Seiler S, Bell-Pedersen D, Paietta J, Plesofsky N, Plamann M, Goodrich-Tanrikulu M, Schulte U, Mannhaupt G, Nargang FE, Radford A, Selitrennikoff C, Galagan JE, Dunlap JC, Loros JJ, Catcheside D, Inoue H, Aramayo R, Polymenis M, Selker EU, Sachs MS, Marzluf GA, Paulsen I, Davis R, Ebbole DJ, Zelter A, Kalkman ER, O'Rourke R, Bowring F, Yeadon J, Ishii C, Suzuki K, Sakai W, Pratt R: Lessons from the genome sequence of N. crassa : tracing the path from genomic blueprint to multicellular organism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004, 68: 1-108. 10.1128/MMBR.68.1.1-108.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tisdale EJ: A Rab2 mutant with impaired GTPase activity stimulates vesicle formation from pre-Golgi intermediates. Mol Biol Cell. 1999, 10: 1837-49.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jones MC, Caswell PT, Norman JC: Endocytic recycling pathways: emerging regulators of cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006, 18: 549-57. 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.08.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hurtado CA, Beckerich JM, Gaillardin C, Rachubinski RA: A rac homolog is required for induction of hyphal growth in the dimorphic yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 2376-86. 10.1128/JB.182.9.2376-2386.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Coca MA, Damsz B, Yun DJ, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Narasimhan ML: Heterotrimeric G-proteins of a filamentous fungus regulate cell wall composition and susceptibility to a plant PR-5 protein. Plant J. 2000, 22: 61-9. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00718.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Segev N: Ypt/rab gtpases: regulators of protein trafficking. Sci STKE. 2001, 2001: RE11-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Seabra MC, Wasmeier C: Controlling the location and activation of Rab GTPases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004, 16: 451-7. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Grosshans BL, Ortiz D, Novick P: Rabs and their effectors: achieving specificity in membrane traffic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 11821-7. 10.1073/pnas.0601617103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Markgraf DF, Peplowska K, Ungermann C: Rab cascades and tethering factors in the endomembrane system. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581: 2125-30. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.090.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Calero M, Chen CZ, Zhu W, Winand N, Havas KA, Gilbert PM, Burd CG, Collins RN: Dual prenylation is required for Rab protein localization and function. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 1852-67. 10.1091/mbc.E02-11-0707.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Leung KF, Baron R, Ali BR, Magee AI, Seabra MC: Rab GTPases containing a CAAX motif are processed post-geranylgeranylation by proteolysis and methylation. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 1487-97. 10.1074/jbc.M605557200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Garrett MD, Zahner JE, Cheney CM, Novick PJ: GDI1 encodes a GDP dissociation inhibitor that plays an essential role in the yeast secretory pathway. EMBO J. 1994, 13: 1718-28.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sivars U, Aivazian D, Pfeffer SR: Yip3 catalyses the dissociation of endosomal Rab-GDI complexes. Nature. 2003, 425: 856-9. 10.1038/nature02057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Chen CZ, Collins RN: Analysis and properties of the yeast YIP1 family of Ypt-interacting proteins. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 403: 333-9. 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)03028-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang X, Matern HT, Gallwitz D: Specific binding to a novel and essential Golgi membrane protein (Yip1p) functionally links the transport GTPases Ypt1p and Ypt31p. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 4954-63. 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4954.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Matern H, Yang X, Andrulis E, Sternglanz R, Trepte HH, Gallwitz D: A novel Golgi membrane protein is part of a GTPase-binding protein complex involved in vesicle targeting. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 4485-92. 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4485.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Barrowman J, Wang W, Zhang Y, Ferro-Novick S: The Yip1p.Yif1p complex is required for the fusion competence of endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicles. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 19878-84. 10.1074/jbc.M302406200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Heidtman M, Chen CZ, Collins RN, Barlowe C: Yos1p is a novel subunit of the Yip1p-Yif1p complex and is required for transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi complex. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 1673-83. 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0873.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Ortiz D, Medkova M, Walch-Solimena C, Novick P: Ypt32 recruits the Sec4p guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Sec2p, to secretory vesicles; evidence for a Rab cascade in yeast. J Cell Biol. 2002, 157: 1005-15. 10.1083/jcb.200201003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang W, Ferro-Novick S: A Ypt32p exchange factor is a putative effector of Ypt1p. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13: 3336-43. 10.1091/mbc.01-12-0577.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Sacher M, Barrowman J, Wang W, Horecka J, Zhang Y, Pypaert M, Ferro-Novick S: TRAPP I implicated in the specificity of tethering in ER-to-Golgi transport. Mol Cell. 2001, 7: 433-42. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00190-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Jones S, Newman C, Liu F, Segev N: The TRAPP complex is a nucleotide exchanger for Ypt1 and Ypt31/32. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 4403-11.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Morozova N, Liang Y, Tokarev AA, Chen SH, Cox R, Andrejic J, Lipatova Z, Sciorra VA, Emr SD, Segev N: TRAPPII subunits are required for the specificity switch of a Ypt-Rab GEF. Nat Cell Biol. 2006, 8: 1263-9. 10.1038/ncb1489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Sato Y, Shirakawa R, Horiuchi H, Dohmae N, Fukai S, Nureki O: Asymmetric Coiled-Coil Structure with Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Activity. Structure. 2007, 15: 245-252. 10.1016/j.str.2007.01.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Dong G, Medkova M, Novick P, Reinisch KM: A catalytic coiled coil: structural insights into the activation of the Rab GTPase Sec4p by Sec2p. Mol Cell. 2007, 25: 455-62. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.013.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Itzen A, Rak A, Goody RS: Sec2 is a highly efficient exchange factor for the Rab protein Sec4. J Mol Biol. 2007, 365: 1359-67. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.096.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Walch-Solimena C, Collins RN, Novick PJ: Sec2p mediates nucleotide exchange on Sec4p and is involved in polarized delivery of post-Golgi vesicles. J Cell Biol. 1997, 137: 1495-509. 10.1083/jcb.137.7.1495.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Novick P, Medkova M, Dong G, Hutagalung A, Reinisch K, Grosshans B: Interactions between Rabs, tethers, SNAREs and their regulators in exocytosis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006, 34: 683-6. 10.1042/BST0340683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Medkova M, France YE, Coleman J, Novick P: The rab exchange factor Sec2p reversibly associates with the exocyst. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 2757-69. 10.1091/mbc.E05-10-0917.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Hama H, Tall GG, Horazdovsky BF: Vps9p is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor involved in vesicle-mediated vacuolar protein transport. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 15284-91. 10.1074/jbc.274.21.15284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Siniossoglou S, Peak-Chew SY, Pelham HR: Ric1p and Rgp1p form a complex that catalyses nucleotide exchange on Ypt6p. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 4885-94. 10.1093/emboj/19.18.4885.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Wurmser AE, Sato TK, Emr SD: New component of the vacuolar class C-Vps complex couples nucleotide exchange on the Ypt7 GTPase to SNARE-dependent docking and fusion. J Cell Biol. 2000, 151: 551-62. 10.1083/jcb.151.3.551.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Du LL, Collins RN, Novick PJ: Identification of a Sec4p GTPase-activating protein (GAP) as a novel member of a Rab GAP family. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 3253-6. 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Albert S, Gallwitz D: Two new members of a family of Ypt/Rab GTPase activating proteins. Promiscuity of substrate recognition. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 33186-9. 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. De Antoni A, Schmitzova J, Trepte HH, Gallwitz D, Albert S: Significance of GTP hydrolysis in Ypt1p-regulated endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport revealed by the analysis of two novel Ypt1-GAPs. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 41023-31. 10.1074/jbc.M205783200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Chesneau L, Dupre S, Burdina A, Roger J, Le Panse S, Jacquet M, Cuif MH: Gyp5p and Gyl1p are involved in the control of polarized exocytosis in budding yeast. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 4757-67. 10.1242/jcs.01349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Whyte JR, Munro S: Vesicle tethering complexes in membrane traffic. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 2627-37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Lupashin V, Sztul E: Golgi tethering factors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 325-39. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.03.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sztul E, Lupashin V: Role of tethering factors in secretory membrane traffic. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006, 290: C11-26. 10.1152/ajpcell.00293.2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Cai H, Yu S, Menon S, Cai Y, Lazarova D, Fu C, Reinisch K, Hay JC, Ferro-Novick S: TRAPPI tethers COPII vesicles by binding the coat subunit Sec23. Nature. 2007, 445: 941-4. 10.1038/nature05527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Kim YG, Sohn EJ, Seo J, Lee KJ, Lee HS, Hwang I, Whiteway M, Sacher M, Oh BH: Crystal structure of bet3 reveals a novel mechanism for Golgi localization of tethering factor TRAPP. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005, 12: 38-45. 10.1038/nsmb871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Turnbull AP, Kummel D, Prinz B, Holz C, Schultchen J, Lang C, Niesen FH, Hofmann KP, Delbruck H, Behlke J, Muller EC, Jarosch E, Sommer T, Heinemann U: Structure of palmitoylated BET3: insights into TRAPP complex assembly and membrane localization. EMBO J. 2005, 24: 875-84. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600565.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Kim MS, Yi MJ, Lee KH, Wagner J, Munger C, Kim YG, Whiteway M, Cygler M, Oh BH, Sacher M: Biochemical and crystallographic studies reveal a specific interaction between TRAPP subunits Trs33p and Bet3p. Traffic. 2005, 6: 1183-95. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00352.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Yu S, Satoh A, Pypaert M, Mullen K, Hay JC, Ferro-Novick S: mBet3p is required for homotypic COPII vesicle tethering in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 2006, 174: 359-68. 10.1083/jcb.200603044.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Cai H, Zhang Y, Pypaert M, Walker L, Ferro-Novick S: Mutants in trs120 disrupt traffic from the early endosome to the late Golgi. J Cell Biol. 2005, 171: 823-33. 10.1083/jcb.200505145.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Cox R, Chen SH, Yoo E, Segev N: Conservation of the TRAPPII-specific subunits of a Ypt/Rab exchanger complex. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7: 12-10.1186/1471-2148-7-12.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Watanabe R, Riezman H: Differential ER exit in yeast and mammalian cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004, 16: 350-5. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Ungar D, Oka T, Krieger M, Hughson FM: Retrograde transport on the COG railway. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16: 113-20. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.12.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Ungar D, Oka T, Brittle EE, Vasile E, Lupashin VV, Chatterton JE, Heuser JE, Krieger M, Waters MG: Characterization of a mammalian Golgi-localized protein complex, COG, that is required for normal Golgi morphology and function. J Cell Biol. 2002, 157: 405-15. 10.1083/jcb.200202016.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Andag U, Schmitt HD: Dsl1p, an essential component of the Golgi-endoplasmic reticulum retrieval system in yeast, uses the same sequence motif to interact with different subunits of the COPI vesicle coat. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 51722-34. 10.1074/jbc.M308740200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Kraynack BA, Chan A, Rosenthal E, Essid M, Umansky B, Waters MG, Schmitt HD: Dsl1p, Tip20p, and the novel Dsl3(Sec39) protein are required for the stability of the Q/t-SNARE complex at the endoplasmic reticulum in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 3963-77. 10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0056.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Combet C, Blanchet C, Geourjon C, Deleage G: NPS@: network protein sequence analysis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000, 25: 147-50. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01540-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Sacher M, Barrowman J, Schieltz D, Yates JR, Ferro-Novick S: Identification and characterization of five new subunits of TRAPP. Eur J Cell Biol. 2000, 79: 71-80. 10.1078/S0171-9335(04)70009-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Bruinsma P, Spelbrink RG, Nothwehr SF: Retrograde transport of the mannosyltransferase Och1p to the early Golgi requires a component of the COG transport complex. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 39814-23. 10.1074/jbc.M405500200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Conibear E, Stevens TH: Vps52p, Vps53p, and Vps54p form a novel multisubunit complex required for protein sorting at the yeast late Golgi. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 305-23.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Conboy MJ, Cyert MS: Luv1p/Rki1p/Tcs3p/Vps54p, a yeast protein that localizes to the late Golgi and early endosome, is required for normal vacuolar morphology. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 2429-43.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Siniossoglou S, Pelham HR: Vps51p links the VFT complex to the SNARE Tlg1p. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 48318-24. 10.1074/jbc.M209428200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Conibear E, Cleck JN, Stevens TH: Vps51p mediates the association of the GARP (Vps52/53/54) complex with the late Golgi t-SNARE Tlg1p. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 1610-23. 10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0654.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Liewen H, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Oliveira V, Schwarzenbacher R, Luo G, Wadle A, Jung M, Pfreundschuh M, Stenner-Liewen F: Characterization of the human GARP (Golgi associated retrograde protein) complex. Exp Cell Res. 2005, 306: 24-34. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.01.022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Fridmann-Sirkis Y, Kent HM, Lewis MJ, Evans PR, Pelham HR: Structural analysis of the interaction between the SNARE Tlg1 and Vps51. Traffic. 2006, 7: 182-90. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00374.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Barr FA, Short B: Golgins in the structure and dynamics of the Golgi apparatus. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003, 15: 405-13. 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00054-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Short B, Haas A, Barr FA: Golgins and GTPases, giving identity and structure to the Golgi apparatus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 383-95. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.02.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Norman TC, Smith DL, Sorger PK, Drees BL, O'Rourke SM, Hughes TR, Roberts CJ, Friend SH, Fields S, Murray AW: Genetic selection of peptide inhibitors of biological pathways. Science. 1999, 285: 591-5. 10.1126/science.285.5427.591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Setty SR, Shin ME, Yoshino A, Marks MS, Burd CG: Golgi recruitment of GRIP domain proteins by Arf-like GTPase 1 is regulated by Arf-like GTPase 3. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 401-4. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00089-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Panic B, Whyte JR, Munro S: The ARF-like GTPases Arl1p and Arl3p act in a pathway that interacts with vesicle-tethering factors at the Golgi apparatus. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 405-10. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00091-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Behnia R, Panic B, Whyte JR, Munro S: Targeting of the Arf-like GTPase Arl3p to the Golgi requires N-terminal acetylation and the membrane protein Sys1p. Nat Cell Biol. 2004, 6: 405-13. 10.1038/ncb1120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Burd CG, Strochlic TI, Gangi Setty SR: Arf-like GTPases: not so Arf-like after all. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14: 687-94. 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.10.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Gillingham AK, Pfeifer AC, Munro S: CASP, the alternatively spliced product of the gene encoding the CCAAT-displacement protein transcription factor, is a Golgi membrane protein related to giantin. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13: 3761-74. 10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0349.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Kim DW: Characterization of Grp1p, a novel cis-Golgi matrix protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 303: 370-8. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00341-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Jahn R, Lang T, Sudhof TC: Membrane fusion. Cell. 2003, 112: 519-33. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00112-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Subramanian S, Woolford CA, Jones EW: The Sec1/Munc18 protein, Vps33p, functions at the endosome and the vacuole of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2004, 15: 2593-605. 10.1091/mbc.E03-10-0767.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Stroupe C, Collins KM, Fratti RA, Wickner W: Purification of active HOPS complex reveals its affinities for phosphoinositides and the SNARE Vam7p. EMBO J. 2006, 25: 1579-89. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601051.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Guo W, Roth D, Walch-Solimena C, Novick P: The exocyst is an effector for Sec4p, targeting secretory vesicles to sites of exocytosis. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 1071-80. 10.1093/emboj/18.4.1071.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Finger FP, Hughes TE, Novick P: Sec3p is a spatial landmark for polarized secretion in budding yeast. Cell. 1998, 92: 559-71. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80948-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Guo W, Tamanoi F, Novick P: Spatial regulation of the exocyst complex by Rho1 GTPase. Nat Cell Biol. 2001, 3: 353-60. 10.1038/35070029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Zhang X, Bi E, Novick P, Du L, Kozminski KG, Lipschutz JH, Guo W: Cdc42 interacts with the exocyst and regulates polarized secretion. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 46745-50. 10.1074/jbc.M107464200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Adamo JE, Rossi G, Brennwald P: The Rho GTPase Rho3 has a direct role in exocytosis that is distinct from its role in actin polarity. Mol Biol Cell. 1999, 10: 4121-33.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Robinson NG, Guo L, Imai J, Toh-E A, Matsui Y, Tamanoi F: Rho3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which regulates the actin cytoskeleton and exocytosis, is a GTPase which interacts with Myo2 and Exo70. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19: 3580-7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Hamburger ZA, Hamburger AE, West AP, Weis WI: Crystal structure of the S. cerevisiae exocyst component Exo70p. J Mol Biol. 2006, 356: 9-21. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Boyd C, Hughes T, Pypaert M, Novick P: Vesicles carry most exocyst subunits to exocytic sites marked by the remaining two subunits, Sec3p and Exo70p. J Cell Biol. 2004, 167: 889-901. 10.1083/jcb.200408124.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Sivaram MV, Saporita JA, Furgason ML, Boettcher AJ, Munson M: Dimerization of the exocyst protein Sec6p and its interaction with the t-SNARE Sec9p. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 6302-11. 10.1021/bi048008z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Zajac A, Sun X, Zhang J, Guo W: Cyclical regulation of the exocyst and cell polarity determinants for polarized cell growth. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 1500-12. 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0896.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. France YE, Boyd C, Coleman J, Novick PJ: The polarity-establishment component Bem1p interacts with the exocyst complex through the Sec15p subunit. J Cell Sci. 2006, 119: 876-88. 10.1242/jcs.02849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Burri L, Lithgow T: A complete set of SNAREs in yeast. Traffic. 2004, 5: 45-52. 10.1046/j.1600-0854.2003.00151.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Ungar D, Hughson FM: SNARE protein structure and function. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003, 19: 493-517. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.110701.155609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Hong W: SNAREs and traffic. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1744: 493-517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Neiman AM: Prospore membrane formation defines a developmentally regulated branch of the secretory pathway in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1998, 140: 29-37. 10.1083/jcb.140.1.29.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Neiman AM, Katz L, Brennwald PJ: Identification of domains required for developmentally regulated SNARE function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2000, 155: 1643-55.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Darsow T, Rieder SE, Emr SD: A multispecificity syntaxin homologue, Vam3p, essential for autophagic and biosynthetic protein transport to the vacuole. J Cell Biol. 1997, 138: 517-29. 10.1083/jcb.138.3.517.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Oyen M, Jantti J, Keranen S, Ronne H: Mapping of sporulation-specific functions in the yeast syntaxin gene SSO1. Curr Genet. 2004, 45: 76-82. 10.1007/s00294-003-0462-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Toikkanen JH, Sundqvist L, Keranen S: Kluyveromyces lactis SSO1 and SEB1 genes are functional in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and enhance production of secreted proteins when overexpressed. Yeast. 2004, 21: 1045-55. 10.1002/yea.1151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Toonen RF, Verhage M: Vesicle trafficking: pleasure and pain from SM genes. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13: 177-86. 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00031-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Li Y, Gallwitz D, Peng R: Structure-based functional analysis reveals a role for the SM protein Sly1p in retrograde transport to the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 3951-62. 10.1091/mbc.E05-02-0114.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Peng R, Gallwitz D: Multiple SNARE interactions of an SM protein: Sed5p/Sly1p binding is dispensable for transport. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 3939-49. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600410.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Castillo-Flores A, Weinberger A, Robinson M, Gerst JE: Mso1 is a novel component of the yeast exocytic SNARE complex. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 34033-41. 10.1074/jbc.M507142200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Knop M, Miller KJ, Mazza M, Feng D, Weber M, Keranen S, Jantti J: Molecular interactions position Mso1p, a novel PTB domain homologue, in the interface of the exocyst complex and the exocytic SNARE machinery in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 4543-56. 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0243.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Marash M, Gerst JE: t-SNARE dephosphorylation promotes SNARE assembly and exocytosis in yeast. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 411-21. 10.1093/emboj/20.3.411.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Gurunathan S, Marash M, Weinberger A, Gerst JE: t-SNARE phosphorylation regulates endocytosis in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13: 1594-607. 10.1091/mbc.01-11-0541.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Weinberger A, Kamena F, Kama R, Spang A, Gerst JE: Control of Golgi morphology and function by Sed5 t-SNARE phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 4918-30. 10.1091/mbc.E05-02-0101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Marash M, Gerst JE: Phosphorylation of the autoinhibitory domain of the Sso t-SNAREs promotes binding of the Vsm1 SNARE regulator in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 3114-25. 10.1091/mbc.E02-12-0804.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Sollner T, Bennett MK, Whiteheart SW, Scheller RH, Rothman JE: A protein assembly-disassembly pathway in vitro that may correspond to sequential steps of synaptic vesicle docking, activation, and fusion. Cell. 1993, 75: 409-18. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90376-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Steel GJ, Laude AJ, Boojawan A, Harvey DJ, Morgan A: Biochemical analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SEC18 gene product: implications for the molecular mechanism of membrane fusion. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 7764-72. 10.1021/bi990315v.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Collins KM, Thorngren NL, Fratti RA, Wickner WT: Sec17p and HOPS, in distinct SNARE complexes, mediate SNARE complex disruption or assembly for fusion. EMBO J. 2005, 24: 1775-86. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600658.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Wiederkehr A, Avaro S, Prescianotto-Baschong C, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Riezman H: The F-box protein Rcy1p is involved in endocytic membrane traffic and recycling out of an early endosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2000, 149: 397-410. 10.1083/jcb.149.2.397.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Galan JM, Wiederkehr A, Seol JH, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Deshaies RJ, Riezman H, Peter M: Skp1p and the F-box protein Rcy1p form a non-SCF complex involved in recycling of the SNARE Snc1p in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 21: 3105-17. 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3105-3117.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Lafourcade C, Galan JM, Peter M: Opposite roles of the F-box protein Rcy1p and the GTPase-activating protein Gyp2p during recycling of internalized proteins in yeast. Genetics. 2003, 164: 469-77.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Lafourcade C, Galan JM, Gloor Y, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Peter M: The GTPase-activating enzyme Gyp1p is required for recycling of internalized membrane material by inactivation of the Rab/Ypt GTPase Ypt1p. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 3815-26. 10.1128/MCB.24.9.3815-3826.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Robinson M, Poon PP, Schindler C, Murray LE, Kama R, Gabriely G, Singer RA, Spang A, Johnston GC, Gerst JE: The Gcs1 Arf-GAP mediates Snc1,2 v-SNARE retrieval to the Golgi in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 1845-58. 10.1091/mbc.E05-09-0832.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Chen SH, Chen S, Tokarev AA, Liu F, Jedd G, Segev N: Ypt31/32 GTPases and their novel F-box effector protein Rcy1 regulate protein recycling. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 178-92. 10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0258.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Hermand D, Bamps S, Tafforeau L, Vandenhaute J, Makela TP: Skp1 and the F-box protein Pof6 are essential for cell separation in fission yeast. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 9671-7. 10.1074/jbc.M211358200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Wang H, Tang X, Liu J, Trautmann S, Balasundaram D, McCollum D, Balasubramanian MK: The multiprotein exocyst complex is essential for cell separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13: 515-29. 10.1091/mbc.01-11-0542.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Boisrame A, Beckerich JM, Gaillardin C: A mutation in the secretion pathway of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica that displays synthetic lethality in combination with a mutation affecting the signal recognition particle. Mol Gen Genet. 1999, 261: 601-9. 10.1007/s004380050002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Butinar L, Santos S, Spencer-Martins I, Oren A, Gunde-Cimerman N: Yeast diversity in hypersaline habitats. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005, 244: 229-34. 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.01.043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Koumandou VL, Dacks JB, Coulson RM, Field MC: Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7: 29-10.1186/1471-2148-7-29.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Hall BS, Pal A, Goulding D, Acosta-Serrano A, Field MC: Trypanosoma brucei : TbRAB4 regulates membrane recycling and expression of surface proteins in procyclic forms. Exp Parasitol. 2005, 111: 160-71. 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.07.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Zeng Q, Morales AJ, Cottarel G: Fungi and humans: closer than you think. Trends Genet. 2001, 17: 682-684. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02498-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Rothstein R: One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983, 101: 202-211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Swennen D, Paul MF, Vernis L, Beckerich JM, Fournier A, Gaillardin C: Secretion of active anti-Ras single-chain Fv antibody by the yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica and Kluyveromyces lactis. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 41-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2Google Scholar
  175. Chung CT, Miller RH: A rapid and convenient method for the preparation and storage of competent bacterial cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 3580-10.1093/nar/16.8.3580.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Xuan JW, Fournier P, Declerck N, Chasles M, Gaillardin C: Overlapping reading frames at the LYS5 locus in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Mol Cell Biol. 1990, 10: 4795-4806.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 24: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.Google Scholar
  178. Page RDM: TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences. 1996, 12: 357-358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Nicholas KB, Nicholas HBJ: GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Distributed by the author.
  180. Genolevures web site. [http://cbi.labri.fr/Genolevures/]
  181. Saccharomyces Genome Database. [http://www.yeastgenome.org/]
  182. NCBI BLAST. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/]
  183. Infobiogen. [http://www.infobiogen.fr/]
  184. NCBI Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/lexington/lexington.cgi?cmd=rps]
  185. ExPASy Proteomics tools. [http://www.expasy.ch/tools/]
  186. CBS Prediction Servers. [http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/]

Copyright

© Swennen and Beckerich; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.