Selection dramatically reduces effective population size in HIV-1 infection
- Yi Liu^{1}Email author and
- John E Mittler^{1}
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-133
© Liu and Mittler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 13 December 2007
Accepted: 03 May 2008
Published: 03 May 2008
Abstract
Background
In HIV-1 evolution, a 100–100,000 fold discrepancy between census size and effective population size (N_{ e }) has been noted. Although it is well known that selection can reduce N_{ e }, high in vivo mutation and recombination rates complicate attempts to quantify the effects of selection on HIV-1 effective size.
Results
We use the inbreeding coefficient and the variance in allele frequency at a linked neutral locus to estimate the reduction in N_{ e }due to selection in the presence of mutation and recombination. With biologically realistic mutation rates, the reduction in N_{ e }due to selection is determined by the strength of selection, i.e., the stronger the selection, the greater the reduction. However, the dependence of N_{ e }on selection can break down if recombination rates are very high (e.g., r ≥ 0.1). With biologically likely recombination rates, our model suggests that recurrent selective sweeps similar to those observed in vivo can reduce within-host HIV-1 effective population sizes by a factor of 300 or more.
Conclusion
Although other factors, such as unequal viral reproduction rates and limited migration between tissue compartments contribute to reductions in N_{ e }, our model suggests that recurrent selection plays a significant role in reducing HIV-1 effective population sizes in vivo.
Background
The effective population size, N_{ e }, is defined as the size of an idealized population that has the same population genetics properties (generally those properties that measure the magnitude of random genetic drift) as the actual population. Most studies have estimated the within-host N_{ e }for HIV-1 during chronic infection to be ~10^{3} [1–5], though one study estimated N_{ e }to be between 10^{5} and 5 × 10^{5} [6]. Even the highest of these estimates is about two orders of magnitude lower than the number of productively infected cells, estimated to be on the order of 10^{7} to 10^{8} cells [7]. Explanations for low N_{ e }values include unequal viral reproduction rates [2–5, 8], structured populations [8–12], and recurrent selection [2–5, 8]. The possibility that recurring selection may be reducing viral diversity is unsettling because most of the computational models used to estimate N_{ e }assume neutral evolution.
During a selective sweep of a favorable allele, any neutral alleles linked to the selected allele will rise in frequency and become overrepresented in the population. This process, called "hitchhiking", can reduce neutral diversity more than random genetic drift and therefore reduce N_{ e }[13]. Although selection has been acknowledged as a possible explanation for the low within-host effective population size during chronic HIV-1 infection [3, 12], high mutation [14, 15] and recombination rates [16–20] complicate attempts to study the effects of selection on HIV-1 in vivo. To address these issues, we extended a classic "inbreeding coefficient" method [21–23] to derive recurrence equations that account for the combined effects of selection, mutation, and recombination. We then used these equations to quantify the effects of selection on effective size using parameters relevant to HIV-1 evolution in vivo.
Results and Discussion
Overview of the genetic model
Our model follows the basic Wright-Fisher assumptions of a single haploid population of constant size with no subdivision or migration, non-overlapping generations, and random sampling of offspring each generation. We calculated N_{ e }in terms of the inbreeding effective size, which is based on the change of the average inbreeding coefficient (F) at a neutral locus (L) that is linked to a locus (S) that is under selection. The inbreeding coefficient is defined as the probability that two individuals are identical by descent (which means they are identical and have a common ancestor). Therefore, for the neutral locus L, two individuals are identical by descent if they are derived from a common ancestor and are identical at locus L, regardless of the status of locus S. Our approach to estimating N_{ e }was to determine changes in the inbreeding coefficient at the neutral locus in the presence and absence of selection and recombination. The effective population size was defined as the size of the neutral population that gave changes in the inbreeding coefficient that were equal to those observed in the presence of selection and recombination.
In the presence of recombination, loci L and S can be derived from different parents (Figure 1B). An offspring with allele a or A at locus S can be derived from one or more parents in the previous generation by the four pathways illustrated in Figure 1B. As above, F_{ t }will be the sum of the probability that the two offspring are derived from a certain combination of pathways (both having locus S from parents with allele A, both having locus S from parents with allele a, one having locus S from a parent with allele a and the other having locus S from a parent with allele A) times the probability that the offspring derived from these pathways are identical by descent at locus L (see APPENDIX).
Effect of selection on effective population size
We used the ratio N/N_{ e }to summarize the reduction in N_{ e }due to selection from the start of selection at t = 0 until t = t_{ nearlyfixed }[the time when the frequency of the advantageous allele reaches (N-1)/N]. This last approximation is helpful because fixation time is asymptotic, with the advantageous allele never reaching 100% in a deterministic model.
Effective population sizes calculated from the inbreeding coefficient (inbreeding N_{ e }) are usually the same as those calculated from the variance in the allele frequency (variance N_{ e }), though exceptions do occur [24–27]. To validate our results, we estimated the effect of selection on N_{ e }by calculating the variance in the frequency of the linked neutral allele from simulations using the same genetic model. Values for the inbreeding N_{ e }obtained from the calculations above were generally consistent with the estimates of the variance N_{ e }derived from these simulations (Figure 2A to 2C). We noted that there was an approximate 3-fold difference in the N_{ e }values between the two methods when s = 0.01 (Figure 2B). This is likely due to the fact that the inbreeding N_{ e }was estimated using a strict deterministic model; while the variance N_{ e }was estimated from simulations of s = 0.01, where genetic drift plays a bigger role.
A very high mutation rate at the neutral locus L (e.g., U = 1000μ) also diminished the reduction in N_{ e }due to selection (Figure 2D). In the absence of mutation, the effect of selection was insensitive to changes in the initial homogeneity at locus L (Figure 2E). In the presence of mutation, selection with an initially heterogeneous population at locus L caused greater reductions in N_{ e }than selection with an initially homogeneous population. For F_{0} less than 0.1, however, further increases in the initial heterogeneity (i.e., making F_{0} even lower) did not lead to further reductions in N_{ e }through selection. Interestingly, reductions in N_{ e }/N due to selection were insensitive to changes in the census population size, N (Figure 2F).
Effect of recurrent selection on effective population size
Conclusion
We examined the combined effects of selection, mutation, and recombination on the effective population size of a neutral locus that is linked to a locus under selection. Consistent with other studies [21–23], we found that selection can increase the inbreeding coefficient and reduce the inbreeding effective population size. Without mutation, this reduction is primarily determined by the initial frequency of the advantageous allele, i.e., the lower the initial frequency, the greater the effect. With mutation, this reduction is mostly determined by the strength of selection, i.e., the stronger the selection, the greater the effect. With moderate recombination rates (e.g., r ≤ 10^{-3}), recurrent selection can substantially lower N_{ e }, though the hitchhiking effect disappears if the recombination rates are very high (e.g., r ≥ 0.1).
The effective population size of HIV-1 during chronic infection has been shown to be 100- to 100,000-fold lower than within-host census size. Indeed, CTL responses are a driving force of HIV-1 evolution and these responses continuously select for escape mutants during chronic infection [28–30]. In a comprehensive study of viral evolution and CTL responses during the first four years of HIV-1 infection in one subject, Liu et al. [30, 31] found that of the 25 epitopes detected in this subject, 17 were largely replaced by mutants over time. The selection coefficients for the CTL escape mutant(s) of a single epitope ranged from 0.2 to 0.4 during acute infection and from 0.0024 to 0.15 during chronic infection, with an average of 0.03 [30]. Humoral and escape-specific CTL responses impose additional selective pressures not quantified in Liu et al. [30, 31]. With low to moderate recombination rates, our model shows that recurrent selection with s = 0.1 reduces viral effective population size by approximately 300-fold. Therefore, during HIV-1 infection, selection alone is likely to reduce the viral effective population size to an N_{ e }of ~10^{5}. This result is close to the estimate of N_{ e }~5 × 10^{5} that Rouzine and Coffin [6] obtained from a model that accounts for selection. The small discrepancy may be due to their use of a lower mutation rate (10^{-5} vs. 2.5 × 10^{-5} in our study) and possible biased sampling of sites with higher underlying mutation rates in their study [5].
With high recombination rates, our model predicts that selection has little effect on N_{ e }. Observations of 3 to 13 cross-over events per virion in vitro [17–20] suggest an intrinsic recombination rate of 10^{-4} to 10^{-3} per adjacent site per generation. However, this range is not relevant to our model since these estimates were obtained using heterozygous virions, which may not be abundant in vivo. While Jung and colleagues [32] have demonstrated that cells in the spleen are infected with multiple viruses (a pre-requisite for the formation of heterozygous virions), they did not determine how often heterozygous virions are formed. More relevant is data in which SCID-HU mice were infected with a 50:50 mixture of two marked strains [19]. Two-to-three weeks after infection, an average of ~0.01% of infected cells carried a phenotypic marker of recombination (present on half of all recombinants). Conservatively assuming a single generation of recombination, we estimate from equation (11, Appendix) that the probability of recombination between their two markers (which were 408 bp apart) was r = ~ p_{ Aa }/(p_{ A }p_{ a }) = 0.0001/(0.5 × 0.5) = ~4 × 10^{-4} per virion per generation – a value too low to break the hitchhiking effects of selection in our model. However, we recognize these are approximate values obtained from a somewhat artificial system. HIV-1 evolution studies could benefit from additional studies of marked viruses in animal models and clever retrospective analyses of in vivo data from humans to determine evolutionarily relevant recombination rates.
Methods
Genetic model
Description of characters, parameters and variables.
Characters | Description |
---|---|
S | Locus under selection. |
L | Neutral locus linked to locus S. |
A | Advantageous allele at locus S. |
a | Disadvantageous allele at locus S. |
Parameters | |
N | Census population size. |
s | Selection coefficient. |
W | Fitness of the advantageous allele A, w = 1+s. |
μ | Probability that locus S mutates from A to a per virion per generation. |
ν | Probability that locus S mutates from a to A per virion per generation. |
U | Probability that mutation occurs at locus L per virion per generation. |
r | Probability of recombination between loci L and S per virion per generation. |
Variables | |
N _{ e } | Effective population size. |
A _{ t } | Frequency of allele A at locus S at generation t. |
a _{ t } | Frequency of allele a at locus S at generation t. |
F _{ t } | Probability that two alleles at locus L are identical by descent at generation t (equivalent to the inbreeding coefficient in classic population genetics). |
$\widehat{F}$ | Inbreeding coefficient at equilibrium. |
F _{AA, t} | F of locus L between offspring with allele A, at generation t. |
F _{aa, t} | F of locus L between offspring with allele a, at generation t. |
F _{Aa, t} | F of locus L between offspring with alleles A and a, at generation t. |
p _{A, t} | Probability that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent with allele A at generation t-1. |
p _{a, t} | Probability that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent with allele a at generation t-1. |
p _{A→A, t} | Probability that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent with allele A, given that the offspring has allele A. |
p _{A→a, t} | Probability that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent with allele A, given that the offspring has allele a. |
p _{a→a, t} | Probability that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent with allele a, given that the offspring has allele a. |
p _{a→A, t} | Probability that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent with allele a, given that the offspring has allele A. |
P _{AA, t} | Probability of an individual at generation t having alleles at loci L and S both being derived from individual(s) with allele A at locus S. |
P _{Aa, t} | Probability of an individual at generation t having locus L derived from an individual with allele A at locus S and locus S derived from an individual with allele a at locus S. |
P _{aa, t} | Probability of an individual at generation t having alleles at loci L and S both being derived from individual(s) with allele a at locus S. |
P _{aA, t} | Probability of an individual at generation t having locus L derived from an individual with allele a at locus S and locus S derived from an individual with allele A at locus S. |
Parameters for HIV-1
The average mutation rate of HIV-1 has been estimated to be 2.5 × 10^{-5} per nucleotide per generation [14], although one recent study estimated a higher mutation rate of ~8.5 × 10^{-5} per site per generation [15]. Assuming that any nucleotide substitution at a defined nucleotide site shifts locus S from the advantageous to the disadvantageous state, we defined μ = 2.5 × 10^{-5} per generation. Assuming that only a particular nucleotide substitution at this site increases fitness, we set ν = μ/3. Since the census sizes of productively HIV-1 infected cells in vivo exceeds 10^{7} [7, 33], most of the comparisons in this study were with N = 10^{7}. Since the accumulation of advantageous alleles in populations is more stochastic as N decreases, we only examined populations with N ≥ 10^{6}.
Effect of selection on effective population size without mutation
Under selection, the inbreeding coefficient of the linked neutral locus will increase faster than expected by random genetic drift until the selected advantageous allele is fixed (A_{ t }= 100%). Because we are using a deterministic model, fixation time is asymptotic. To quantify the effect of selection, we determined the average time for an advantageous allele to approach fixation, t_{ nearlyfixed }, and the value of F at t_{ nearlyfixed }. t_{ nearlyfixed }can be calculated from $t=\mathrm{log}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}(\frac{{A}_{t}{a}_{0}}{{a}_{t}{A}_{0}})/\mathrm{log}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}(w)$, where t is the time just before the favored allele A at locus S becomes fixed; i.e., when ${A}_{t}=\frac{N-1}{N}$ and ${a}_{t}=\frac{1}{N}$. F was calculated with μ = 0, v = 0, and U = 0. The corresponding N_{ e }is defined here as the population size under neutrality that will increase F from F_{0} to ${F}_{{t}_{nearlyfixed}}$ between t = 0 and t = t_{ nearlyfixed }. We determined the corresponding N_{ e }under the following conditions: N = 10^{6} to 10^{9}; s = 0.01 to 10; A_{0} = 10^{-7} to 10^{-3}; and F_{0} = F_{AA,0 }= F_{aa,0 }= F_{Aa,0 }= 10^{-4} to 0.8 (if F_{0} = 1, F will not change over time without mutation, regardless of selection).
Effect of selection on effective population size with mutation and recombination
The frequency of the A allele cannot be maintained at 100% with the occurrence of the back mutation from A to a at locus S. Therefore t_{ nearlyfixed }was set to the time that A_{ t }and a_{ t }reached equilibrium, i.e., when A_{ t }= A_{t+1}. The corresponding N_{ e }, the population size under neutrality that will increase F from F_{0} to ${F}_{{t}_{nearlyfixed}}$ between t = 0 and t = t_{ nearlyfixed }, was determined using numerical iteration [Appendix equation (2)]. We determined the corresponding N_{ e }under the following conditions: N = 10^{6} to 10^{9}; s = 0.01 to 10; A_{0} = 0 to 10^{-3}; F_{0} = F_{aa,0 }= 10^{-4} to 1; F_{AA,0 }= F_{Aa,0 }= 0, if A_{0} = 0 and F_{AA,0 }= F_{Aa,0 }= F_{0}, if A_{0} > 0; μ = 2.5 × 10^{-5}, v = μ/3, U = μ to 1000μ, and r = 0 to 1. With these high advantageous mutation rates and large population sizes (Nv >> 1), individuals with allele a had mutations to allele A in almost every generation, preventing advantageous allele A from being lost from the population due to genetic drift.
Effect of recurrent selection on effective population size
With the fixation of the advantageous allele A, the inbreeding coefficient of locus L will undergo a nearly neutral change unless new alleles linked to locus L become advantageous. To estimate the effect of recurrent selection on N_{ e }, we assumed that all loci under selection are linked to locus L in the absence of recombination. We also assumed that each selected locus was under sequential selection, i.e., when the frequency of an advantageous allele reached 99.9% at generation t, we assumed that another locus started to undergo selection (calculated by setting A_{ t }= 0, F_{aa, t}= F_{ t }, F_{AA, t}= 0, and F_{Aa, t}= 0). For simplicity, we assumed that all of the selected loci have the same mutation rate and selection coefficient. We calculated F under recurrent selection under the following conditions: N = 10^{7}, A_{0} = 0, F_{AA,0 }= F_{Aa,0 }= 0, F_{0} = F_{aa,0 }= 1, μ = 2.5 × 10^{-5}, v = μ/3, and U = μ; s = 0.01 to 10; and r = 0 to 1.
Estimate of the effect of selection on variance effective population size by simulation
The change in the average inbreeding coefficient is one of several criteria used to estimate effective population size [24–27]. To validate our results using a different measure of effective population size, we estimated the effect of selection on N_{ e }by calculating the variance in the frequency of the linked neutral allele from simulations using the genetic model described above. The parameters used in these simulations were the same as those used for the calculation for the inbreeding coefficient described above. When simulating selection in the absence of mutation, the simulations were performed under the following conditions: N = 10^{7}; s = 0.01 to 10; A_{0} = 10^{-7} to 10^{-3}; F_{0} = F_{AA,0 }= F_{aa,0 }= F_{Aa,0 }= 0.1; μ = v = U = 0; and r = 0. When simulating selection in the presence of mutation, the simulations were performed with the following conditions: N = 10^{7}; s = 0.01 to 10; A_{0} = 0; F_{0} = F_{aa,0 }= 1, F_{AA,0 }= F_{Aa,0 }= 0; μ = 2.5 × 10^{-5}, v = μ/3, and U = μ; s = 0.01 to 10; and r = 0 to 1. Since the deterministic model assumes an infinite population size, we only examined a large population size of 10^{7}. For each condition, 100,000 simulations were repeated. We calculated the variance of the allele frequency at the linked neutral locus L at the corresponding t_{ nearlyfixed }. Under neutrality in the absence of mutation, the allele frequency variance can be calculated by $p(1-p)[1-{(1-\frac{1}{N})}^{t}]$[34]. Therefore, the population size under neutrality (N_{ e }) that has the same variance in allele frequency as the population under selection can be determined using numerical iteration. In the presence of mutation, we used simulation to determine the range of the population size under neutrality. These were used to determine the range of allele frequency variances that matched the frequency variance under selection at the corresponding t_{ nearlyfixed }.
Appendix
Recurrence equation for Fin the absence of selection
where t is time in generations and N is the population size [26]. $\frac{1}{N}$ gives the probability that two offspring are derived from same parent in which case the probability of them being identical by descendent is 1. $(1-\frac{1}{N})$ is the probability that two offspring are derived from different parents in which case the probability of them being identical by descendent is F_{t-1}. In the presence of mutation, ${F}_{t}=[\frac{1}{N}+(1-\frac{1}{N}){F}_{t-1}]{(1-U)}^{2}$[35]. To obtain F_{ t }in terms of F_{0}, let $\alpha =\frac{1}{N}\times {(1-U)}^{2}$, and $\beta =(1-\frac{1}{N})\times {(1-U)}^{2}$. This gives
F_{1} = α + βF_{0}
F_{2} = α + βF_{1} = α + β × (α + βF_{0}) = α + αβ + β^{2}F_{0}
F_{3} = α + βF_{2} = α + β × (α + αβ + β^{2}F_{0}) = α + αβ + αβ^{2} + β^{3}F_{0}
F_{ t }= α + αβ + αβ^{2} + αβ^{3} + ... + αβ_{t-1 }+ β^{ t }F_{0}.
The formula, 1 + x + ... + x^{n-1 }= (1-x^{ n })/(1-x), gives the following:
F_{ t }= α (1 - β^{ t })/(1 - β) + β^{ t }F_{0}, (2)
As t approaches infinity, F converges to the equilibrium $\widehat{F}=\frac{\alpha}{(1-\beta )}\approx \frac{1}{1+2NU}$, as shown previously by Kimura and Crow [35].
Recurrence equations for Fin the presence of a selected locus without recombination
Here, A_{t-1 }and a_{t-1 }are the frequencies of the advantageous and disadvantageous alleles at locus S at generation t-1. ${p}_{A,t}=\frac{w{A}_{t-1}}{w{A}_{t-1}+{a}_{t-1}}$ and ${p}_{a,t}=\frac{{a}_{t-1}}{w{A}_{t-1}+{a}_{t-1}}$ give the probabilities that an offspring at generation t is derived from a parent at generation t-1 with allele A or a, respectively. F_{ AA }, F_{ Aa }, and F_{ aa }give the probabilities that parents with the indicated alleles will be identical by descent at locus L. Given that both parents have allele A or a at locus S, the $\frac{1}{N{A}_{t-1}}$ and $\frac{1}{N{a}_{t-1}}$ terms respectively give the probabilities that two offspring have the same parent (in which case the probability of being identical by descent at locus L, in the absence of mutation is 1). The $1-\frac{1}{N{A}_{t-1}}$ and $1-\frac{1}{N{a}_{t-1}}$ terms give the probability that the two offspring came from different parents (in which case the probabilities of identity by descent at locus L, in the absence of mutation, are F_{AA, t-1 }and F_{aa, t-1 }respectively). The term (1-U)^{2} accounts for the fact that two individuals cannot be identical by descent if there is a mutation at the neutral locus L.
and
F_{Aa,t}= (p_{A→A,t}p_{a→a,t}F_{Aa,t-1 }+ p_{a→a,t}p_{a→A,t}F_{aa,t-1 }+ p_{A→a,t}p_{A→A,t}F_{AA,t-1 }+ p_{A→a,t}p_{a→A,t}F_{Aa,t-1})(1 - U)^{2}
When A_{1}, a_{1}, F_{1}, F_{AA,1}, F_{aa,1}, and F_{Aa,1 }are available, we can calculate F_{2} using equation (3), and F_{AA,2}, F_{aa,2}, and F_{Aa,2 }using equations (4) to (6). Therefore, F_{ t }can be obtained by iteration.
Recurrence equations for Fin the presence of a selected locus and recombination
where p_{xy, t}is the probability that an individual at generation t has a neutral locus L derived from an individual with allele x at locus S, and a selected locus S derived from an individual with allele y at locus S (x and y can be A or a). This probability is the sum of the probability of no recombination and the probability of recombination between individuals with indicated allele at locus S. The -1's in the (Np_{x, t}- 1) and (N - 1) terms above account for the fact that a haploid individual cannot recombine with itself.
where A_{ t }and a_{ t }are calculated using equations (7) and (8).
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We thank James I. Mullins for his guidance and critical comments on an early draft, two anonymous reviewers for constructive criticisms, and Reneé Ireton for editing the final version. The authors were supported by grants from the NIH (R03 AI055394, R01 HL072631, P01 AI57005, R01 AI058894, and RO1 AI047734), the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research (NIH grant P30 AI27757), and a gift from the Frank H. Jernigan Charitable Foundation.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Drummond AJ, Nicholls GK, Rodrigo AG, Solomon W: Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics. 2002, 161 (3): 1307-1320.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leigh-Brown AJ: Analysis of HIV-1 env gene sequences reveals evidence for a low effective number in the viral population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (5): 1862-1865. 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1862.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Achaz G, Palmer S, Kearney M, Maldarelli F, Mellors JW, Coffin JM, Wakeley J: A Robust Measure of HIV-1 Population Turnover within Chronically Infected Individuals. Mol Biol Evol. 2004, 21 (10): 1902-1912. 10.1093/molbev/msh196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seo T-K, Thorne JL, Hasegawa M, Kishino H: Estimation of Effective Population Size of HIV-1 Within a Host: A Pseudomaximum-Likelihood Approach. Genetics. 2002, 160 (4): 1283-1293.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shriner D, Shankarappa R, Jensen MA, Nickle DC, Mittler JE, Margolick JB, Mullins JI: Influence of random genetic drift on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 env evolution during chronic infection. Genetics. 2004, 166 (3): 1155-1164. 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1155.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rouzine IM, Coffin JM: Linkage disequilibrium test implies a large effective population number for HIV in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (19): 10758-10763. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10758.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haase AT: Population biology of HIV-1 infection: viral and CD4+ T cell demographics and dynamics in lymphatic tissues. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999, 17: 625-656. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.625.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kouyos RD, Althaus CL, Bonhoeffer S: Stochastic or deterministic: what is the effective population size of HIV-1?. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14 (12): 507-511. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haddad DN, Birch C, Middleton T, Dwyer DE, Cunningham AL, Saksena NK: Evidence for late stage compartmentalization of HIV-1 resistance mutations between lymph node and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. AIDS. 2000, 14 (15): 2273-2281. 10.1097/00002030-200010200-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fulcher JA, Hwangbo Y, Zioni R, Nickle D, Lin X, Heath L, Mullins JI, Corey L, Zhu T: Compartmentalization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 between blood monocytes and CD4+ T cells during infection. J Virol. 2004, 78 (15): 7883-7893. 10.1128/JVI.78.15.7883-7893.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong JK, Ignacio CC, Torriani F, Havler D, Fitch NJS, Richman DD: In vivo compartmentalization of human immunodeficiency virus: evidence from the examination of pol sequences from autopsy tissues. J Virol. 1997, 71 (3): 2059-2071.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shriner D, Liu Y, Nickle DC, Mullins JI: Evolution of intrahost HIV-1 genetic diversity during chronic infection. Int J Org Evolution. 2006, 60 (6): 1165-1176.Google Scholar
- Barton NH: Genetic hitchhiking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000, 355 (1403): 1553-1562. 10.1098/rstb.2000.0716.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansky LM: Forward mutation rate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in a T lymphoid cell line. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1996, 12 (4): 307-314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neil PK, Sun G, Yu H, Ron Y, Dougherty JP, Preston BD: Mutational analysis of HIV-1 long terminal repeats to explore the relative contribution of reverse transcriptase and RNA polymerase II to viral mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (41): 38053-38061. 10.1074/jbc.M204774200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shriner D, Rodrigo AG, Nickle DC, Mullins JI: Pervasive genomic recombination of HIV-1 in vivo. Genetics. 2004, 167 (4): 1573-1583. 10.1534/genetics.103.023382.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhuang J, Jetzt AE, Sun G, Yu H, Klarmann G, Ron Y, Preston BD, Dougherty JP: Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Recombination: Rate, Fidelity, and Putative Hot Spots. J Virol. 2002, 76 (22): 11273-11282. 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11273-11282.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jetzt AE, Yu H, Klarmann GJ, Ron Y, Preston BD, Dougherty JP: High rate of recombination throughout the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome. J Virol. 2000, 74 (3): 1234-1240. 10.1128/JVI.74.3.1234-1240.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy DN, Aldrovandi GM, Kutsch O, Shaw GM: Dynamics of HIV-1 recombination in its natural target cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (12): 4204-4209. 10.1073/pnas.0306764101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhodes T, Wargo H, Hu WS: High rates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 recombination: near-random segregation of markers one kilobase apart in one round of viral replication. J Virol. 2003, 77 (20): 11193-11200. 10.1128/JVI.77.20.11193-11200.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robertson A: Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genet Res. 1961, 2: 189-194.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Woolliams JA, Bijma P: Predicting rates of inbreeding in populations undergoing selection. Genetics. 2000, 154 (4): 1851-1864.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wray NR, Thompson R: Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genet Res. 1990, 55 (1): 41-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ewens WJ: On the concept of the effective population size. Theor Popul Biol. 1982, 21: 373-378. 10.1016/0040-5809(82)90024-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kimura M, Crow JF: The measurement of effective population numbers. Evolution. 1963, 17: 279-288. 10.2307/2406157.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wright S: Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931, 16: 97-159.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartl DL, Clark AG: Principles of Population Genetics. 1989, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 2Google Scholar
- Allen TM, Altfeld M, Geer SC, Kalife ET, Moore C, O'Sullivan KM, Desouza I, Feeney ME, Eldridge RL, Maier EL, et al: Selective escape from CD8+ T-cell responses represents a major driving force of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequence diversity and reveals constraints on HIV-1 evolution. J Virol. 2005, 79 (21): 13239-13249. 10.1128/JVI.79.21.13239-13249.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones NA, Wei X, Flower DR, Wong M, Michor F, Saag MS, Hahn BH, Nowak MA, Shaw GM, Borrow P: Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 escape from the primary CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte response. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (10): 1243-1256. 10.1084/jem.20040511.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, McNevin J, Cao J, Zhao H, Genowati I, Wong K, McLaughlin S, McSweyn M, Diem K, Stevens C, et al: Selection on the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteome following primary infection. J Virol. 2006, 80 (19): 9519-9529. 10.1128/JVI.00575-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, McNevin J, Zhao H, Tebit DM, Troyer RM, McSweyn M, Ghosh AK, Shriner D, Arts EJ, McElrath MJ, et al: Evolution of HIV-1 CTL epitopes: Fitness-Balanced Escape. J Virol. 2007, 81 (22): 12179-12188. 10.1128/JVI.01277-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung A, Maier R, Vartanian J-P, Bocharov G, Jung V, Fischer U, Meese E, Wain-Hobson S, Meyerhans A: Multiply infected spleen cells in HIV patients. Nature. 2002, 418 (6894): 144-10.1038/418144a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chun T-W, Carruth L, Finzi D, Shen X, DiGiuseppe JA, Taylor H, Hermankova M, Chadwick K, Margolick J, Quinn TC, et al: Quantification of latent tissue reservoirs and total body viral load in HIV-1 infection. Nature. 1997, 387: 183-188. 10.1038/387183a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nei M: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
- Kimura M, Crow JF: The Number of Alleles That Can Be Maintained in a Finite Population. Genetics. 1964, 49: 725-738.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.