Functional studies in model organisms, such as vertebrates and Drosophila, have shown that basic Helix-loop-Helix (bHLH) proteins have important roles in different steps of neurogenesis, from the acquisition of neural fate to the differentiation into specific neural cell types. However, these studies highlighted many differences in the expression and function of orthologous bHLH proteins during neural development between vertebrates and Drosophila. To understand how the functions of neural bHLH genes have evolved among bilaterians, we have performed a detailed study of bHLH genes during nervous system development in the polychaete annelid, Platynereis dumerilii, an organism which is evolutionary distant from both Drosophila and vertebrates.
We have studied Platynereis orthologs of the most important vertebrate neural bHLH genes, i.e. achaete-scute, neurogenin, atonal, olig, and NeuroD genes, the latter two being genes absent of the Drosophila genome. We observed that all these genes have specific expression patterns during nervous system formation in Platynereis. Our data suggest that in Platynereis, like in vertebrates but unlike Drosophila, (i) neurogenin is the main proneural gene for the formation of the trunk central nervous system, (ii) achaete-scute and olig genes are involved in neural subtype specification in the central nervous system, in particular in the specification of the serotonergic phenotype. In addition, we found that the Platynereis NeuroD gene has a broad and early neuroectodermal expression, which is completely different from the neuronal expression of vertebrate NeuroD genes.
Our analysis suggests that the Platynereis bHLH genes have both proneural and neuronal specification functions, in a way more akin to the vertebrate situation than to that of Drosophila. We conclude that these features are ancestral to bilaterians and have been conserved in the vertebrates and annelids lineages, but have diverged in the evolutionary lineage leading to Drosophila.
Neurogenesis is a complex process that involves the formation of a vast array of neuronal and glial cell types that must be produced in the correct numbers and at appropriate positions. Genetic and molecular studies mainly conducted in Drosophila and vertebrates have shown that genes encoding transcription factors of the basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) class play pivotal roles in various steps of neurogenesis, including commitment of neural precursors (proneural function), specification of particular neuronal identities, and neuronal differentiation [1–5]. Most of the genes encoding bHLH transcription factors and which are involved in neural development (hereafter named neural bHLH genes), belong to five of the numerous phylogenetically-defined bHLH families, achaete-scute and four families of atonal -related genes, neurogenin, atonal, olig (oligo), and NeuroD [2, 6]. While some of the neural bHLH genes show strikingly similar functions in Drosophila and vertebrates [2, 3, 7], there are also profound differences between them [1, 4].
First, in vertebrates, genes of the neurogenin family (ngn1, ngn2, and ngn3) are required for the formation of the precursors of many neural cells of both the Peripheral and Central Nervous Systems (PNS and CNS) [8–10] while their single Drosophila ortholog, tap/biparous, has no proneural role and is expressed in a few differentiating neural cells [11, 12]. In Drosophila, the main proneural bHLH genes for the CNS belong to the achaete-scute family and are also involved, together with atonal family genes, in the formation of the sensory organs [2, 3, 13, 14]. Vertebrate achaete-scute and atonal genes probably also have proneural functions but in a much more limited set of cells, in particular in the CNS [1, 2, 4].
Second, vertebrate proneural genes contribute to the specification of progenitor-cell identity [2, 4, 5]. A clear example of such a function is provided by the dorsal embryonic spinal cord, in which Math1 (atonal family), ngn1, and Mash1 (ascl1; achaete-scute family) are required for the correct specification of discrete dorsoventral progenitor domains that produce distinct types of interneurons [15–18]. Mash1 has also been shown to have instructive roles in the specification of noradrenergic, GABAergic, and serotonergic neurons in various positions in the brain and the spinal cord [19–22]. Finally, ngn2 has a key role for motor neurons formation in the ventral spinal cord [23, 24]. Such important roles in neuronal specification for proneural bHLH genes in the CNS are not found in Drosophila [1, 4].
Third, bHLH genes that have important functions during vertebrate neurogenesis do not have orthologs in Drosophila. Many vertebrate neurons require the function of genes, which belong to the NeuroD family, for their proper differentiation and survival [25–27]. Genes of the olig family (olig1, olig2, and olig3) have key roles in the specification of motor neurons, dorsal interneurons, and oligodendrocytes in the vertebrate CNS [18, 23, 24, 28–30]. olig and NeuroD genes do not exist in Drosophila (the gene known in Drosophila as Dm-oli is in fact an ortholog of the vertebrate Beta3 genes) [6, 31].
Given these differences and in order to decipher which aspects of the functions of neural bHLH genes are ancestral to bilaterians and which are derived characters specific to some bilaterian lineages, we have isolated and studied these genes in the polychaete annelid, Platynereis dumerilii, which belongs to a different branch (Trochozoa) of the bilaterians tree than Drosophila (Ecdysozoa) and vertebrates (Deuterostoma) and is therefore evolutionary distant to both these organisms . In addition, Platynereis is considered to have retained some bilaterian ancestral features, making it a useful model for comparative developmental biology [e.g. [33–35]]. Here, we report the expression patterns of Platynereis orthologs of the most important neural bHLH genes, including the olig and NeuroD genes not found in Drosophila. Our data suggest that Platynereis bHLH genes have both proneural and neuronal specification functions, in a way more akin to the vertebrate situation than to that of Drosophila. These data indicate that these functions were already established in Urbilateria, the last common ancestor of all bilaterians.
Brief overview of the formation of the Platynereis larval nervous system
Platynereis displays an indirect development which gives rise to a ciliated trochophore larva that subsequently metamorphoses into a juvenile worm . The formation of the Platynereis larval trunk nervous system has been thoroughly described, up to the late trochophore stage (metatrochophore; 48 to 55 hours post fertilization, hpf), using whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) with RNA antisense probes corresponding to Platynereis neuronal differentiation genes, such as elav (Pdu-elav), synaptotagmin (Pdu-syt), Tryptophane Hydroxylase (Pdu-TrpH), and Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter (Pdu-VAchT) . In order to give an overview of larval neurogenesis, which is important to understand the next parts of this article, we show here some WMISH for these previously characterized genes in 24 hpf to 55 hpf larvae and extend the published description by looking at juvenile worms (72 hpf).
A simple larval nervous system first differentiates during the early (24 hpf) to late trochophore (48 hpf) stages: a few cells expressing Pdu-elav are observed on the ventral side of the 24 hpf and 34 hpf larvae (Figure 1A,B) and these cells give rise to two bilateral anterior groups and one posterior group of Pdu-syt -expressing neurons (Figure 1C). Different neuronal subtypes can be identified, such as serotonergic (identified as cells expressing Pdu-TrpH) and cholinergic (identified as cells expressing Pdu-VAchT; Figure 1D,E). From 48 hpf, a large number of cells enter neural differentiation and express first Pdu-elav (Figure 1F,G) and then Pdu-syt (Figure 1H). These neurons form the ventral nerve cord (VNC) of the 72 hpf juvenile worm (Figure 1I,J). Many of the formed neurons are cholinergic neurons as seen by the massive expression of Pdu-VAchT (Figure 1L) in the VNC, except in its medialmost part where several serotonergic neurons differentiate (expression of Pdu-TrpH; Figure 1K). Outside the VNC, peripheral neurons are also found mainly associated with the appendages (the parapodes; arrows in Figure 1J).
Identification of Platynereis atonal- and achaete-scute-related bHLH genes
By sequence similarity searches on an expressed sequence tag (EST) collection (40,000 ESTs from normalized cDNA libraries of mixed larval stages, corresponding to more than 10,000 unigene clusters) , we identified several Platynereis dumerilii bHLH genes among which some show strong sequence similarity to either achaete-scute - or atonal -related genes. The predicted amino acid sequence of the bHLH domains were aligned with those of a sample of metazoan bHLH genes identified in a previous study . Multiple phylogenetic reconstructions show that we identified orthologs of the neurogenin/biparous, achaete-scute/ASCL/ASH, olig, and NeuroD genes (Figures 2 and 3). We named these genes Pdu-Ngn, Pdu-ASH, Pdu-Olig, and Pdu-NeuroD, respectively. For each family, we found a single Platynereis member but we cannot exclude that additional members do exist, although duplicated evolutionary-conserved genes are rare in Platynereis . We also included in our analysis the previously identified atonal ortholog (Pdu-ATH; not found in the EST collection) [35, 37] in order to study Platynereis representatives for all the main families of bHLH genes involved in neural determination and specification in vertebrates and Drosophila [2, 4]. We also identified Beta3 and mist genes in Platynereis (Figure 2), but these genes were not further characterized as their Drosophila and vertebrate orthologs do not have well defined functions in neurogenesis. We used WMISH to monitor the expression of Pdu-Ngn, Pdu-ASH, Pdu-Olig, Pdu-ATH, and Pdu-NeuroD during Platynereis development and focused on possible expressions during trunk nervous system formation for which a good characterization exists . All the genes are also expressed in the head, probably in the brain and/or sensory organs, but these expressions were not further characterized.
Platynereis atonal- and achaete-scute-related bHLH genes are expressed during trunk nervous system formation
The five bHLH genes are already expressed in 24 hpf larvae. Pdu-NeuroD is expressed in a broad ventral ectodermal domain (Figure 4A) which corresponds to the larval neuroectoderm. This expression domain is similar to that of Platynereis orthologs of bilaterian conserved neuroectodermal genes, such as SoxB (Figure 5A–C and P.K. et al., unpublished). Pdu-Ngn and Pdu-ASH are expressed in a few cells located on the ventral side of the larvae, in particular around the stomodaeal area (Figure 4B,C). This expression nicely prefigures the distribution of differentiating neurons that is observed in slightly later stages (Figure 1B,C), suggesting that the two genes are expressed in precursors of the larval central nervous system. Pdu-ATH and Pdu-Olig are expressed in a few lateral cells we were unable to identify (Figure 4D,E).
In 34 hpf larvae, Pdu-NeuroD is still expressed in a broad ventral ectodermal domain (Figure 4F) which includes the prospective VNC region in which Pdu-Ngn and Pdu-ASH become widely expressed (Figure 4G,H). At this stage, the expression of Pdu-SoxB strongly decreases in the same region (Figure 5D). In vertebrates, the transition from neuroectodermal cells to committed progenitors is linked to the activation of the expression of bHLH proneural genes and a concomitant repression of the expression of SoxB genes [e.g. [2, 38]]. Our data suggest that a similar transition occurs around 34 hpf in the Platynereis larvae. However, at this stage, only very few cells express Pdu-elav (Figure 1B), indicating that the Pdu-Ngn and Pdu-ASH expressing precursors are still not engaged towards differentiation. Both Pdu-Ngn and Pdu-ASH are also expressed in more lateral cells that may correspond to peripheral nervous system precursors (Figure 4G,H). Pdu-ATH and Pdu-Olig continue to be expressed in lateral cells, with Pdu-Olig expressed in three bilateral small stripes (Figure 4I,J).
In 40 hpf to 55 hpf larvae, Pdu-NeuroD continues to be broadly expressed in the ventral ectoderm (Figure 4K,P). Expression of Pdu-NeuroD is restricted to the superficial layer of the ectoderm (not shown). From 40 hpf to 55 hpf larvae, Pdu-Ngn is largely expressed in the whole prospective VNC region as well as in some more lateral cells (Figure 4L,Q). Pdu-Ngn is expressed in a salt and pepper manner, with highly-expressing cells interspersed with weakly-expressing ones. In 40 hpf and 48 hpf larvae, Denes et al.  showed that the prospective Platynereis VNC region is multilayered with, from superficial (apical) to more internal (basal), a proliferating progenitor zone (a single layer of BrdU incorporating cells), a post-mitotic progenitor zone (Pdu - elav positive, Pdu-syt negative cells), and a differentiation zone (Pdu - elav positive, Pdu-syt positive cells). To define in which zone(s) of the prospective VNC Pdu-Ngn is expressed, we performed double WMISH  for Pdu-Ngn, on one hand, and Pdu-elav or Pdu-syt, on the other hand, and visualized the labellings with confocal microscopy (Figure 6). We found that Pdu-Ngn is mainly expressed in superficial cells in contrast to Pdu-elav and Pdu-syt (Figure 6A,B). We used 3D reconstructions of confocal stacks to perform virtual cross-sections of the VNC region (Figure 6F,H): we found that Pdu-Ngn is expressed in the apicalmost cells of the prospective VNC with very little overlap with Pdu-elav and no overlap with Pdu-syt. We therefore conclude that Pdu-Ngn is expressed in undifferentiated neural precursors and mainly in the proliferating ones.
Pdu-ASH and Pdu-Olig, at 40 and 48 hpf, are expressed in the medialmost part of the prospective VNC region as well as in more lateral cells (Figure 4M,O). As for Pdu-Ngn, Pdu-ASH and Pdu-Olig are expressed in proliferating progenitors, as determined by double WMISH (Figure 6C,D,G,I and not shown). The expression of Pdu-ASH and Pdu-Olig in the medialmost part of the prospective VNC region is similar to that of the Platynereis NK2.2 gene and corresponds to the region from which serotonergic neurons will emerge (Figure 1K) . We confirmed by double WMISH that the serotonergic neurons (Pdu-TrpH -expressing cells) are located below the Pdu-ASH -expressing precursors (Figure 6J). At 55 hpf, Pdu-ASH shows the same expression pattern than in the previous stages, but Pdu-Olig is no more expressed in the prospective VNC region (Figure 4R,T). In 40 hpf to 55 hpf larvae, Pdu-ATH is only expressed in a few cells located on both sides of the prospective VNC region (Figure 4N,S).
At 72 hpf, the five genes are expressed in more limited sets of cells in the VNC region and in cells associated with the parapodes (Figure 4U–Y). In addition, Pdu-Ngn, Pdu-ASH, Pdu-Olig, and Pdu-NeuroD are expressed in posteriorly-located internal cells (Figure 5E–H) whose position roughly corresponds to that of cells expressing Platynereis hunchback  and stem-cells markers, such as Platynereis piwi and vasa . The cells expressing Pdu-Ngn, Pdu-ASH, Pdu-Olig, and Pdu-NeuroD may therefore belong to the posterior subterminal growth zone that will allow the posterior addition of new segments to the existing ones (and the corresponding elongation of the VNC) in a sequential manner throughout most of the life of the animal [41, 42].
Olig and NeuroD genes belong to the ancestral bilaterian toolkit of neural developmental genes
In this article, we report, for the first time, the characterization of several atonal - and achaete-scute -related bHLH genes from a lophotrochozoan species, the annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Our phylogenetic analyses demonstrate that we have identified neurogenin, achaete-scute, olig, and NeuroD orthologs in addition to a previously characterized atonal gene (Figures 2 and 3). neurogenin, achaete-scute, and atonal genes have been found in many diverse species, including Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and several vertebrates, and shown to be involved in neural development in all these species [e.g. [2, 7, 31]]. We found a similar situation in Platynereis as the three genes display specific expressions during neurogenesis (see below for further discussion), confirming their evolutionary-wide implication in neurogenesis in bilaterian animals.
NeuroD genes have been shown to be important neuronal differentiation genes in vertebrates (see introduction). A putative NeuroD gene (named cnd-1 but whose orthology relationship with the vertebrate NeuroD genes is only poorly supported; ) has been described in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and is involved in several steps of the formation of the motor neurons . NeuroD genes cannot be found in the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and of the urochordate Ciona intestinalis [6, 45]. Our phylogenomic analysis (Figure 2) indicates that NeuroD genes are in fact widely found in bilaterians and that their absence in Drosophila melanogaster and Ciona intestinalis results from a rather specific loss in these species. We found the Platynereis NeuroD gene to have a broad and early neuroectodermal expression, which is completely different from the neuronal expression of vertebrate NeuroD genes and the neural subtype-specific expression of Caenorhabditis cnd-1. It is therefore difficult to infer from these data any putative ancestral expression or function of NeuroD. More precise inference will await additional data from other species.
Olig genes were thought to be vertebrate-specific genes as they are not found in the Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Ciona intestinalis genomes [6, 45]. In fact, olig genes are found in several non-vertebrate species (Figure 2). However, we cannot find such genes in any of the sequenced arthropod and nematode genomes [, E.S. and M.V., unpublished observations], suggesting that olig genes have been lost quite early during the evolution of these phyla. We found the Platynereis olig gene to be specifically expressed during nervous system formation and that its expression shows similarities to that of vertebrate olig genes (see below). We therefore conclude that olig, together with neurogenin, achaete-scute, atonal, and NeuroD genes belong to the ancestral bilaterian toolkit of neural developmental genes.
Vertebrate-like expression of Platynereis neurogenin suggests a major proneural role and provides insights into the evolution of the proneural function in bilaterians
One striking difference between vertebrate and Drosophila neurogenesis is the differential use of neurogenin genes in these species. Indeed, neurogenin genes are the key proneural genes in the vertebrate CNS while it is not the case for their Drosophila counterpart (see introduction). In Drosophila, and probably more generally in arthropods, the proneural function in the CNS is mainly performed by the achaete-scute genes (see introduction and ). These genes have a much more limited proneural functions in vertebrates (see introduction). Given these differences, it is challenging to infer what was the ancestral situation, i.e. what were the main proneural genes acting in Urbilateria, the last common ancestor of all bilaterians. Our data on Platynereis help to answer this question.
We found that Platynereis neurogenin (Pdu-Ngn) has an expression suggestive of a wide proneural function in the developing trunk CNS which is similar to that of the vertebrate neurogenin genes. Indeed, Pdu-Ngn expression arises at early stages of neural development, overlapping that of the neuroectodermal marker SoxB, and preceding the expression of the differentiation marker elav. The expression domain of Pdu-Ngn is large and covers the whole prospective CNS region (ventral part of the trunk ectoderm) as well as more lateral regions which probably correspond to the PNS. Pdu-Ngn is expressed in a salt and pepper manner which is often found for proneural genes as a consequence of lateral inhibition processes (reviewed in [1, 2]). Finally, Pdu-Ngn is expressed in the apicalmost part of the forming CNS, which has been shown to include proliferative neuroectodermal cells and neural precursors . Pdu-Ngn is therefore expressed at the right time, the right place, and the right manner to be the major proneural gene for the formation of the Platynereis trunk nervous system, like its orthologs in vertebrates. This similarity between vertebrates (deuterostomes) and an annelid (a protostome) suggests that the broad proneural function of neurogenin genes is ancestral to bilaterians and has been lost in the evolutionary lineage leading to present-day insects (or even arthropods). This does not necessarily mean that proneural function of achaete-scute genes is a derived character: indeed, such function is found in vertebrates and in arthropods, and the expression of Pdu-ASH is not incompatible with this function, as it is expressed in early stages of VNC formation (although only in a subset of the Pdu-Ngn -expressing cells – an expression that is, to our opinion, more consistent with a role in neural specification). It is therefore conceivable that both neurogenin and achaete-scute were acting as proneural genes in Urbilateria, the former being the predominant one.
Platynereis bHLH genes may have neural specification functions in the CNS – evolution of neural specification in bilaterians
Another striking difference between vertebrates and Drosophila is the differential use of bHLH genes in neural subtype specification in the CNS. In vertebrate, neural bHLH genes such as olig and achaete-scute genes are important to specify many types of neural cells which are produced in the CNS, while it is not the case in the Drosophila CNS (although a single study has suggested that achaete-scute genes may be involved in the specification of a limited set of cells in the CNS ; but see ). This raises the possibility that the functions of bHLH genes in neural subtype specification may largely represent vertebrate innovations. Alternatively, they could be bilaterian ancestral functions that have been lost in the evolutionary lineage leading to Drosophila. We found that two Platynereis bHLH genes, Pdu-ASH and Pdu-Olig, are expressed in a way suggestive of an involvement in neural specification in the CNS. Both genes are expressed in the medialmost part of the CNS, they are first co-expressed and in a second time, only Pdu-ASH continues to be expressed. Interestingly, these expression profiles coincide with those of vertebrates olig and achaete-scute genes which are also expressed in medial parts of the neural tube (reviewed in ). Importantly, this similarity is probably meaningful as the overall organization of the Platynereis CNS bears striking resemblances with that of vertebrates, as seen by the conserved expression domains of many neural patterning and differentiation genes between Platynereis and vertebrates . The cells expressing Pdu-ASH and Pdu-Olig correspond to a domain of the VNC characterized by the co-expression of Platynereis NK2.2 and NK6 genes . In vertebrates, such as mammals, Ascl1/Mash1 is also expressed in a NK2.2/NK6 positive medial domain (p3 domain in the spinal cord and its topological equivalent in the hindbrain, PMNv) and controls the formation of serotonergic neurons from this domain in the hindbrain [21, 22]. Strikingly, serotonergic neurons in Platynereis also emerge from a medial domain of the CNS, corresponding to cells expressing NK2.2 and achaete-scute. We therefore suggest that Pdu-ASH is involved in the specification of serotonergic neurons in Platynereis and that this may represent an ancestral function of achaete-scute genes in bilaterians.
In vertebrates, such as mammals, olig genes have important roles in neural specification. olig2 gene is expressed in the so-called pMN domain of the spinal cord, located slightly more laterally than the p3 domain (see Introduction and ). This domain corresponds to a NK6/Pax6 -positive domain from which originate Hb9 -positive cholinergic motor neurons and oligodendrocytes, the specification of both of these cells types being controled by olig2. This NK6/Pax6 -positive domain also exists in Platynereis and, as in vertebrates, Hb9 -positive cholinergic neurons emerge from this domain . Pdu-Olig is, however, not expressed in this domain (it is expressed in the more medial NK6/NK2.2 -positive domain) and is therefore much probably not involved in motor neurons specification. However its co-expression with Pdu-ASH at some but not all stages of VNC formation, in the NK6/NK2.2 -positive domain, suggests it may contribute to the diversification of neural cell types from this domain. We suggest that different neural cell types may form in the prospective Platynereis VNC first from the Pdu-ASH/Pdu-Olig -positive cells and then from the Pdu-ASH -positive (Pdu-Olig -negative) cells. This suggestion is based on the fact that, in vertebrates, different combinations of neural bHLH have been shown to control the formation of different cell types from a single medio-lateral domain [5, 48].
Our data suggest that some neural bHLH genes are involved in neural subtype specification in Platynereis, like in vertebrates, and that this may therefore represent an ancestral feature of bilaterians. In insects, such as Drosophila, the specification functions of neural bHLH genes (and even some genes such as Olig) have been lost. This may be related to the fact that insects have evolved a divergent way to pattern their CNS: while in vertebrates and Platynereis the CNS is subdivided into large domains from which emerge specific neural cell types, insects have shifted to a mainly cell-to-cell-based process in which neuroblasts (even neighbouring ones) will express different combinations of developmental genes that control their identity.
We have identified, for the first time in a lophotrochozoan species, Platynereis dumerilii, orthologs of the most important neural bHLH genes known in vertebrates, including the Olig and NeuroD genes not found in Drosophila. We have performed a detailed analysis of the expression patterns of these Platynereis bHLH genes and we show that all these genes are expressed during neurogenesis. Our analysis suggests that the Platynereis bHLH genes have both proneural and neuronal specification functions, in a way more akin to the vertebrate situation than to that of Drosophila. Our data suggest that these functions are ancestral to bilaterians.
Breeding culture, embryo collection, whole mount in situ hybridization (WMISH), microscopy, and image processing
Animals were obtained from a breeding culture established in Gif-sur-Yvette according to the protocol of Fisher and Dorresteijn . Larvae collection and fixation, as well as WMISH, were done as previously described [39, 50]. In the case of the double WMISH, one of the probes was revealed using tyramide signal amplification (fluorescent dye) and the other using the classical NBT/BCIP reaction. The NBT/BCIP staining was visualized by reflection confocal laser scanning microscopy . Labeled embryos picture Z-stacks were manually taken on a Leica bright-field microscope and Z-projection images were made using ImageJ 1.36b. Confocal pictures were taken on a Leica Sp2 confocal microscope and images were 3D reconstructed with Metamorph.
Isolation of Platynereis bHLH genes and phylogenetic analyses
Platynereis bHLH genes were identified by BLAST searches against an EST collection . The coding sequences of the different genes were amplified using SMART™ RACE cDNA amplification procedures with gene-specific primers (whose sequences are available upon request). PCR-products were TA cloned into the PCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen), sequenced on an ABI automated sequencer, and used as template to produce labeled antisense RNA probes for WMISHs. Accession numbers for the newly cloned genes are FM163169 to FM163172.
Multiple sequence alignments were built using ClustalW  using a large set of bHLH domains derived from Simionato et al.  in addition to those encoded by the isolated Platynereis genes. Neighbour-joining (NJ) reconstructions were performed with the PAUP 4.0 program using the BioNJ algorithm and 10,000 bootstrap replicates [52, 53]. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed with PHYML using the Jones, Taylor, Thornton (JTT) model of amino acid substitutions  and 150 bootstraps to assess the statistical reliability of the obtained internal branches. Bayesian inference was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method as implemented in the MRBAYES (version 3) package . We used the JTT substitution frequency matrix with among-sites rate variation modelled by means of a discrete γ distribution with four equally probable categories. Two independent Markov chains were run, each containing 2,000,000 Monte Carlo steps. One out of every 250 trees was saved. The trees obtained in the two runs were meshed and the first 25% of the trees were discarded as 'burnin'. Marginal probabilities at each internal branch were taken as a measure of statistical support. All the alignments and the trees are available upon request.
We thank Genoscope (Evry) for producing the Platynereis ESTs sequences. This work was supported by grants from the Agence National de la Recherche and the Ministère Français de la Recherche, through its ACI 'Jeunes chercheurs'(MV). ES and ND hold fellowships from the Ministère Français de la Recherche and PK a "Bourse pour Docteur-Ingénieur" from the CNRS. VL was financially supported by the Belgian Science Policy. We thank Guillaume Balavoine for support and the Imaging and Cell Biology facility of the IFR87 (FR-W2251) for expert support with confocal microscopy.
Evolution et Développement des métazoaires, Centre de Génétique Moléculaire-UPR 2167 CNRS
Belgian EMBnet Node – Laboratoire de Bioinformatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut de Biologie et de Médecine Moléculaires
Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory
UFR Sciences du Vivant, Université Paris Diderot
Vervoort M, Ledent V: The evolution of the neural basic Helix–Loop–Helix proteins.ScientificWorldJournal 2001, 1: 396–426.PubMed
Bertrand N, Castro DS, Guillemot F: Proneural genes and the specification of neural cell types.Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3: 517–530.View ArticlePubMed
Gomez–Skarmeta JL, Campuzano S, Modolell J: Half a century of neural prepatterning: the story of a few bristles and many genes.Nat Rev Neurosci 2003, 4: 587–598.View ArticlePubMed
Quan XJ, Hassan B: From skin to nerve: flies, vertebrates and the first helix.Cell Mol Life Sci 2005, 62: 2036–2049.View ArticlePubMed
Guillemot F: Spatial and temporal specification of neural fates by transcription factor codes.Development 2007, 134: 3771–3780.View ArticlePubMed
Ledent V, Paquet O, Vervoort M: Phylogenetic analysis of the human basic helix–loop–helix proteins.Genome Biol 2002, 3: RESEARCH0030.View ArticlePubMed
Hassan BA, Bellen HJ: Doing the MATH: is the mouse a good model for fly development?Genes Dev 2000, 14: 1852–1865.PubMed
Fode C, Gradwohl G, Morin X, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Goridis C, Guillemot F: The bHLH protein NEUROGENIN 2 is a determination factor for epibranchial placode–derived sensory neurons.Neuron 1998, 20: 483–494.View ArticlePubMed
Ma Q, Chen Z, del Barco Barrantes I, de la Pompa JL, Anderson DJ: neurogenin1is essential for the determination of neuronal precursors for proximal cranial sensory ganglia.Neuron 1998, 20: 469–482.View ArticlePubMed
Ma Q, Fode C, Guillemot F, Anderson DJ: Neurogenin1andneurogenin2control two distinct waves of neurogenesis in developing dorsal root ganglia.Genes Dev 1999, 13: 1717–1728.View ArticlePubMed
Bush A, Hiromi Y, Cole M: Biparous: a novel bHLH gene expressed in neuronal and glial precursors inDrosophila.Dev Biol 1996, 180: 759–772.View ArticlePubMed
Ghysen A, Dambly–Chaudiere C: The specification of sensory neuron identity inDrosophila.Bioessays 1993, 15: 293–298.View ArticlePubMed
Skeath JB: At the nexus between pattern formation and cell–type specification: the generation of individual neuroblast fates in theDrosophilaembryonic central nervous system.Bioessays 1999, 21: 922–931.View ArticlePubMed
Bermingham NA, Hassan BA, Wang VY, Fernandez M, Banfi S, Bellen HJ, Fritzsch B, Zoghbi HY: Proprioceptor pathway development is dependent onMath1.Neuron 2001, 30: 411–422.View ArticlePubMed
Helms AW, Johnson JE: Specification of dorsal spinal cord interneurons.Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003, 13: 42–49.View ArticlePubMed
Zhuang B, Sockanathan S: Dorsal–ventral patterning: a view from the top.Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 16: 20–24.View ArticlePubMed
Fode C, Ma Q, Casarosa S, Ang SL, Anderson DJ, Guillemot F: A role for neural determination genes in specifying the dorsoventral identity of telencephalic neurons.Genes Dev 2000, 14: 67–80.PubMed
Parras CM, Schuurmans C, Scardigli R, Kim J, Anderson DJ, Guillemot F: Divergent functions of the proneural genesMash1andNgn2in the specification of neuronal subtype identity.Genes Dev 2002, 16: 324–338.View ArticlePubMed
Goridis C, Rohrer H: Specification of catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons.Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3: 531–541.View ArticlePubMed
Pattyn A, Simplicio N, van Doorninck JH, Goridis C, Guillemot F, Brunet JF: Ascl1/Mash1is required for the development of central serotonergic neurons.Nat Neurosci 2004, 7: 589–595.View ArticlePubMed
Mizuguchi R, Sugimori M, Takebayashi H, Kosako H, Nagao M, Yoshida S, Nabeshima Y, Shimamura K, Nakafuku M: Combinatorial roles ofolig2andneurogenin2in the coordinated induction of pan–neuronal and subtype–specific properties of motoneurons.Neuron 2001, 31: 757–771.View ArticlePubMed
Novitch BG, Chen AI, Jessell TM: Coordinate regulation of motor neuron subtype identity and pan–neuronal properties by the bHLH repressor Olig2.Neuron 2001, 31: 773–789.View ArticlePubMed
Lee JE, Hollenberg SM, Snider L, Turner DL, Lipnick N, Weintraub H: Conversion ofXenopusectoderm into neurons byNeuroD, a basic helix–loop–helix protein.Science 1995, 268: 836–844.View ArticlePubMed
Miyata T, Maeda T, Lee JE: NeuroDis required for differentiation of the granule cells in the cerebellum and hippocampus.Genes Dev 1999, 13: 1647–1652.View ArticlePubMed
Schwab MH, Bartholomae A, Heimrich B, Feldmeyer D, Druffel–Augustin S, Goebbels S, Naya FJ, Zhao S, Frotscher M, Tsai MJ, Nave K: Neuronal basic helix–loop–helix proteins (NEX and BETA2/Neuro D) regulate terminal granule cell differentiation in the hippocampus.J Neurosci 2000, 20: 3714–3724.PubMed
Lu QR, Sun T, Zhu Z, Ma N, Garcia M, Stiles CD, Rowitch DH: Common developmental requirement forOligfunction indicates a motor neuron/oligodendrocyte connection.Cell 2002, 109: 75–86.View ArticlePubMed
Zhou Q, Anderson DJ: The bHLH transcription factors OLIG2 and OLIG1 couple neuronal and glial subtype specification.Cell 2002, 109: 61–73.View ArticlePubMed
Muller T, Anlag K, Wildner H, Britsch S, Treier M, Birchmeier C: The bHLH factor Olig3 coordinates the specification of dorsal neurons in the spinal cord.Genes Dev 2005, 19: 733–743.View ArticlePubMed
Simionato E, Ledent V, Richards G, Thomas–Chollier M, Kerner P, Coornaert D, Degnan BM, Vervoort : Origin and diversification of the basic helix–loop–helix gene family in metazoans: insights from comparative genomics.BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7: 33.View ArticlePubMed
Philippe H, Telford MJ: Large–scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny.Trends Ecol Evol 2006, 21: 614–620.View ArticlePubMed
Tessmar–Raible K, Arendt : Emerging systems: between vertebrates and arthropods, the Lophotrochozoa.Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003, 13: 331–340.View ArticlePubMed
Raible F, Tessmar–Raible K, Osoegawa K, Wincker P, Jubin C, Balavoine G, Ferrier D, Benes V, de Jong P, Weissenbach J, Bork P, Arendt D: Vertebrate–type intron–rich genes in the marine annelidPlatynereis dumerilii.Science 2005, 310: 1325–1326.View ArticlePubMed
Denes AS, Jekely G, Steinmetz PR, Raible F, Snyman H, Prud'homme B, Ferrier DE, Balavoine G, Arendt D: Molecular architecture of annelid nerve cord supports common origin of nervous system centralization in bilateria.Cell 2007, 129: 277–288.View ArticlePubMed
Fischer A, Dorresteijn A: The polychaetePlatynereis dumerilii(Annelida): a laboratory animal with spiralian cleavage, lifelong segment proliferation and a mixed benthic/pelagic life cycle.Bioessays 2004, 26: 314–325.View ArticlePubMed
Arendt D, Tessmar K, de Campos–Baptista MI, Dorresteijn A, Wittbrodt J: Development of pigment–cup eyes in the polychaetePlatynereis dumeriliiand evolutionary conservation of larval eyes in Bilateria.Development 2002, 129: 1143–1154.PubMed
Graham V, Khudyakov J, Ellis P, Pevny : SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity.Neuron 2003, 39: 749–765.View ArticlePubMed
Jékely G, Arendt D: Cellular resolution expression profiling using confocal detection of NBT/BCIP precipitate by reflection microscopy.Biotechniques 2007, 42: 751–755.View ArticlePubMed
Kerner P, Zelada González F, Le Gouar M, Ledent V, Arendt D, Vervoort M: The expression of ahunchbackortholog in the polychaete annelidPlatynereis dumeriliisuggests an ancestral role in mesoderm development and neurogenesis.Dev Genes Evol 2006, 216: 821–828.View ArticlePubMed
Rebscher N, Zelada–Gonzalez F, Banisch TU, Raible F, Arendt D: Vasaunveils a common origin of germ cells and of somatic stem cells from the posterior growth zone in the polychaetePlatynereis dumerilii.Dev Biol 2007, 306: 599–611.View ArticlePubMed
de Rosa R, Prud'homme B, Balavoine G: Caudaland even–skipped in the annelidPlatynereis dumeriliiand the ancestry of posterior growth.Evol Dev 2005, 7: 574–587.View ArticlePubMed
Ledent V, Vervoort M: The basic helix–loop–helix protein family: comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis.Genome Res 2001, 11: 754–770.View ArticlePubMed
Hallam S, Singer E, Waring D, Jin Y: The C. elegansNeuroDhomolog cnd–1 functions in multiple aspects of motor neuron fate specification.Development 2000, 127: 4239–4252.PubMed
Satou Y, Imai KS, Levine M, Kohara Y, Rokhsar D, Satoh N: A genomewide survey of developmentally relevant genes inCiona intestinalis. I. Genes for bHLH transcription factors.Dev Genes Evol 2003, 213: 213–221.View ArticlePubMed
Stollewerk A, Simpson P: Evolution of early development of the nervous system: a comparison between arthropods.Bioessays 2005, 27: 874–883.View ArticlePubMed
Skeath JB, Doe CQ: The achaete–scute complex proneural genes contribute to neural precursor specification in theDrosophilaCNS.Curr Biol 1996, 6: 1146–1152.View ArticlePubMed
Sugimori M, Nagao M, Bertrand N, Parras CM, Guillemot F, Nakafuku M: Combinatorial actions of patterning and HLH transcription factors in the spatiotemporal control of neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the developing spinal cord.Development 2007, 134: 1617–1629.View ArticlePubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.