Open Access

Evolution of a family of metazoan active-site-serine enzymes from penicillin-binding proteins: a novel facet of the bacterial legacy

  • Nina Peitsaro1, 2,
  • Zydrune Polianskyte1, 2,
  • Jarno Tuimala3,
  • Isabella Pörn-Ares1, 2,
  • Julius Liobikas2,
  • Oliver Speer2,
  • Dan Lindholm4,
  • James Thompson5 and
  • Ove Eriksson1, 2Email author
BMC Evolutionary Biology20088:26

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-26

Received: 01 May 2007

Accepted: 28 January 2008

Published: 28 January 2008

Abstract

Background

Bacterial penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactamases (PBP-βLs) constitute a large family of serine proteases that perform essential functions in the synthesis and maintenance of peptidoglycan. Intriguingly, genes encoding PBP-βL homologs occur in many metazoan genomes including humans. The emerging role of LACTB, a mammalian mitochondrial PBP-βL homolog, in metabolic signaling prompted us to investigate the evolutionary history of metazoan PBP-βL proteins.

Results

Metazoan PBP-βL homologs including LACTB share unique structural features with bacterial class B low molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins. The amino acid residues necessary for enzymatic activity in bacterial PBP-βL proteins, including the catalytic serine residue, are conserved in all metazoan homologs. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that metazoan PBP-βL homologs comprise four alloparalogus protein lineages that derive from α-proteobacteria.

Conclusion

While most components of the peptidoglycan synthesis machinery were dumped by early eukaryotes, a few PBP-βL proteins were conserved and are found in metazoans including humans. Metazoan PBP-βL homologs are active-site-serine enzymes that probably have distinct functions in the metabolic circuitry. We hypothesize that PBP-βL proteins in the early eukaryotic cell enabled the degradation of peptidoglycan from ingested bacteria, thereby maximizing the yield of nutrients and streamlining the cell for effective phagocytotic feeding.

Background

Penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactamases (PBP-βLs) are serine proteases that are distinguished by a catalytic -SXXK-motif (X is any amino acid) [15]. Due to their vital role in bacterial biology, PBP-βLs are of importance both medically and economically. Penicillin-binding proteins synthesize and maintain peptidoglycan, the major cell wall component in most bacteria. Penicillin-binding proteins are inhibited by β-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins and cephalosporins which prevent peptidoglycan synthesis and therefore bacterial proliferation. As a defense mechanism against β-lactam antibiotics, some bacteria produce β-lactamases which hydrolyze the antibiotics into biologically inactive metabolites. Phylogenetic analyses show that β-lactamases have evolved from penicillin-binding proteins on at least three occasions indicating a recurrent need to protect/maintain the peptidoglycan synthesis machinery [3, 68]. Many metazoan organisms including humans harbor proteins that share sequence similarity to PBP-βLs [9]. The genes for metazoan PBP-βL homologs most likely derive from bacteria and may have been acquired by either horizontal or endosymbiotic gene transfer. However, the almost universal lack of peptidoglycan synthesis in eukaryotes raises the questions of (i) what immediate benefit(s) PBP-βL proteins conferred to the recipient cell, and (ii) what biochemical properties the PBP-βL proteins were later endowed with, that lead to their integration in the protein repertoire of higher metazoan species.

Based on amino acid sequence, 3-dimensional structure, and domain organization, bacterial PBP-βLs can be categorized into low molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins classes A to C, high molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins classes A to C, and β-lactamases classes A, C, and D [25]. The structure and catalytic mechanism of PBP-βLs have been extensively studied [16, 10]. All PBP-βLs share three conserved active site motifs which contribute to the formation of the catalytic cavity [15]. The -SXXK-motif contains the catalytic serine residue which undergoes acylation and deacylation cycles. The -[SY]X[NT]-motif harbors side chains that point into the active site cleft and participate in the catalytic process. The -[KH][ST]G-motif is located in a β-sheet and participates in substrate docking through antiparallel backbone hydrogen bonding. The arrangement of the three active site motifs along the amino acid sequence is distinctive for each PBP-βL class [25]. The size of the PBP-βL domain varies from about 200 amino acids in class D β-lactamases to over 400 amino acids in class C low molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins, indicating that the PBP-βL domain has undergone extensive diversification through modification of local structural elements [15].

LACTB is a mammalian protein comprised of a mitochondrial import sequence and a domain sharing sequence similarity to PBP-βLs (human LACTB, [Swiss-Prot:P83111]). This domain is 450 amino acids long and the three PBP-βL active site motifs (-SISK-, -YST-, and -HTG-) have been identified through sequence comparisons with bacterial PBP-βLs [9, 11]. LACTB has been detected in several mitochondrial proteome survey studies suggesting that LACTB is a ubiquitous protein in mammalian mitochondria [1215]. LACTB is subjected to regulation at transcriptional and posttranslational level. In skeletal muscle, LACTB expression is rapidly increased by insulin [16] implying a role in anabolic processes. In liver, lysine acetylation of LACTB occurs during starvation [17] suggesting that LACTB, like several key enzyme in metabolism, is regulated by the highly conserved acetyltransferase/deacetylase pathway [18]. The catalytic serine residue located in the -SISK-motif is phosphorylated under normal conditions suggesting that LACTB is activated by a specific phosphoprotein phosphatase [19]. However, the enzymatic substrates and physiological function of LACTB remains unknown.

Here we have investigated the evolutionary history of LACTB and other metazoan PBP-βLs homologs, which we herein refer to as the LACTB family. A combined phylogenetic and structural analysis demonstrated that the LACTB family has evolved from class B low molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins (LPBP-B). The presence of the conserved catalytic serine residue in all LACTB family proteins suggest that they have peptidase or esterase activity.

Results and discussion

LACTB shares conserved active site signature motifs with bacterial PBP-βL proteins

We performed extensive database searches for proteins sharing sequence similarity with human LACTB. Metazoan proteins containing the three active site motifs -SXXK-, -[SY]X[NT]-, and -[KH][ST]G-shared by all PBP-βLs [16], were classified as LACTB family proteins (Table 1). LACTB orthologs were identified using the reciprocal best-hit approach [20, 21]. We found that all completed vertebrate genomes harbor a LACTB ortholog. We also identified LACTB orthologs in Ciona intestinalis, Strogylocentrotus purpuratus, Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Schistosoma japonicum, and Dictyostelium discoideum. An amino acid alignment of the active site motifs and their flanking regions is shown (Figure 1, panel A). For comparison we included the corresponding amino acid segments from the D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase [Swiss-Prot:P15555] of the actinobacterium Streptomyces sp. strain R61, which is perhaps the most extensively studied PBP-βL family protein [22, 23]. The alignment shows that the active site motifs and the catalytic serine residue are conserved in all taxa from bacteria to human suggesting that LACTB is an active-site-serine enzyme. In addition, several amino acids flanking the active site motifs are conserved from bacteria to human further suggesting that LACTB and the bacterial PBP-βL proteins share common features in the secondary and tertiary structure. Metazoan LACTB orthologs harbor a 50–100 amino acid long N-terminal region with no sequence similarity to the Streptomyces D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase or to any other bacterial PBP-βL protein. The N-terminal region starts with a predicted mitochondrial import sequence (Figure 1, panel A). Comparison of the gene architecture of the metazoan LACTB orthologs (Figure 1, panel B) revealed extensive similarities of the exon-intron organization supporting that these genes were vertically inherited from a common ancestor [24].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-8-26/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_595_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Amino acid alignment of catalytic site motifs and gene architecture of LACTB orthologs. (A) Schematic organization and alignment of the three PBP-βLs catalytic site motifs (highlighted in green) and their flanking regions in LACTB orthologs. The corresponding motifs in the Streptomyces sp. strain R61 D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase [Swiss-Prot:P15555] are included. Abbreviations for species names, in order: Homsa, Homo sapiens (Swiss-Prot:P83111); Macmu, Macaca mulatta (Ensembl:ENSMMUP00000004719); Musmu, Mus musculus (Swiss-Prot:Q9EP89); Orycu, Oryctolagus cuniculus (Ensembl:ENSOCUP00000008608); Canfa, Canis familiaris (RefSeq:XP_544713); Bosta, Bos taurus (Swiss-Prot:P83095); Mondo, Monodelphis domestica (Ensembl:ENSMODP00000013893); Galga,Gallus gallus (Swiss-Prot:Q5ZK12); Xentr, Xenopus tropicalis (Ensembl:ENSXETG00000009720); Fugru, Fugu rubipes (Ensembl:SINFRUP00000138119); Oryla, Oryzia latipes (Ensembl:ENSORLP00000009787); Gasac, Gasterosteus aculeatus (Ensembl:ENSGACP00000014046); Danre, Danio rerio (RefSeq:NP_001018429); Strpu, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (RefSeq:XP_789736); Cioin, Ciona intestinalis (Ensembl:ENSCING00000006798); Schja, Schistosoma japonicum (GenPept:AAX27853, AAX25200); Caeel, Caenorhabditis elegans (RefSeq:NP_001041033); Caebr, Caenorhabiditis briggsae (GenPept:CAE74593); Dicdi, Dictyostelium discoideum (Swiss-Prot:Q55CN2); Stesp, Streptomyces sp strain R61. The mitochondrial import sequence (Mito) is indicated. Amino acid conserved in all taxa are highlighted in yellow. (B) Organization of exons and introns in LACTB genes of representative metazoan taxa.

Table 1

Accession Numbers and Proposed Classification of Proteins Used in This Study

Species

Accession number

Database

Proposed classification

Reference

EUKARYOTA

    

Vertebrata

    

Bos taurus

P83095

Swiss-Prot

LACTB

[12]

Bos taurus

XP_601949

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

 

Canis familiaris

XP_544713

RefSeq

LACTB

[47]

Danio rerio

NP_001018429

RefSeq

LACTB

 

Fugu rubipes

SINFRUP00000138119

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Gallus gallus

Q5ZK12

Swiss-Prot

LACTB

[48]

Gallus gallus

XP_001232283

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

[48]

Gasterosteus aculeatus

ENSGACP00000014046

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Homo sapiens

P83111

Swiss-Prot

LACTB

[9]

Homo sapiens

XP_934300

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

 

Macaca mulatta

ENSMMUP00000004719

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Monodephis domestica

ENSMODP00000013893

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Mus musculus

Q9EP89

Swiss-Prot

LACTB

[11,13]

Mus musculus

XP_205950

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

 

Oryctolagus cuniculus

ENSOCUP00000008608

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Oryzias latipes

ENSORLP00000009787

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Tetrodon nigroviridis

CAG03509

GenPept

LACTB-like protein 2

[49]

Tetrodon nigroviridis

GSTENP00015949001

Ensembl

LACTB

[49]

Xenopus tropicalis

ENSXETG00000009720

Ensembl

LACTB

 

Tunicata

    

Ciona intestinalis

ENSCING00000006798

Ensembl

LACTB

[50]

Echinodermata

    

Strongylocent. purpuratus

XP_781179

RefSeq

Esterase-like

 

Strongylocent. purpuratus

XP_781241

RefSeq

Esterase-like

 

Strongylocent. purpuratus

XP_789736

RefSeq

LACTB

 

Nematoda

    

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE57335

GenPept

LACTB-like protein 1

[51]

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE57450

GenPept

Esterase-like

[51]

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE59629

GenPept

Esterase-like

[51]

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE67822

GenPept

Esterase-like

[51]

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE73201

GenPept

Esterase-like

[51]

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE74593

GenPept

LACTB

[51]

Caenorhabditis briggsae

CAE75151

GenPept

LACTB-like protein 1

[51]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_001041033

RefSeq

LACTB

[52]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_495790

RefSeq

Esterase-like

[52]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_496176

RefSeq

Esterase-like

[52]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_496299

RefSeq

Esterase-like

[52]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_505821

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 1

[52]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_509221

RefSeq

Esterase-like

[52]

Caenorhabditis elegans

NP_509969

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 1

[52]

Platyhelminthes

    

Schistosoma japonicum

AAX27853, AAX25200

GenPept

LACTB

 

Mycetozoa

    

Dictyostelium discoideum

Q55CN2

Swiss-Prot

LACTB

[53]

Dictyostelium discoideum

XP_640123

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

[53]

Dictyostelium discoideum

XP_640124

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

[53]

Dictyostelium discoideum

XP_641364

RefSeq

LACTB-like protein 2

[53]

BACTERIA

    

α-proteobacteria

    

Bradyrhizobium japonicum

NP_770552

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

Hyphomonas neptunium

YP_759849

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

Maricaulis maris

YP_755834

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

Mesorhizobium loti

NP_107127

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

Oceanicaulis alexandrii

YP_755834

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

Sphingopyxis alaskensis

YP_618034

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

β-proteobacteria

    

Burkholderia gladioli

Q9KX40

Swiss-Prot

LPBP-Ba

 

Bacillae

    

Bacillus cereus

ZP_00239307

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

Actinobacteria

    

Streptomyces sp. strain R61

P15555

Swiss-Prot

 

[22,23]

Salinispora tropica

ZP_01429613

RefSeq

LPBP-Ba

 

NOTE.- aClassified according to the scheme of Massova and Mobashery [3].

Amino acid sequence and structural features indicate that LACTB derives from class B low molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins

Phylogenetic and structural analyses show that the bacterial PBP-βL family is monophyletic and has diversified by local structural changes and domain fusions [18]. The bacterial PBP-βL family can be divided into seven distinct and highly divergent classes that share little or no inter-class sequence identity except for the three common catalytic site motifs [28]. Proteins from the different PBP-βL classes are distinguished by the specific amino acids in the active site motifs and the number of amino acid residues between the three motifs [28]. The arrangement of the active site motifs along the amino acid sequence for a set of founding members of each bacterial PBP-βL class is shown (Figure 2, Additional file 1). Comparing the arrangement of the active site motifs and their specific amino acids in human and C. elegans LACTB with the founding members of each of the bacterial PBP-βL classes revealed that LACTB is related to the LPBP-B proteins. Sequence comparison of the PBP-βL domain of LACTB with the LPBP-B proteins indicated a moderate degree of sequence identity (16–27%). Conversely, there was little or no inter-motif similarity between LACTB and the proteins belonging to the other bacterial PBP-βL classes. Based on comparison with the founding members of the PBP-βL classes, LACTB can thus be classified as a LPBP-B protein. To test the global validity of this classification we investigated if all bacterial PBP-βL proteins sharing sequence similarity to LACTB are LBPB-B proteins. Searches in the NCBI nr database using human LACTB as the seed sequence yielded more than five hundred bacterial proteins. We divided these proteins into five categories based on E-value (10-5–10-10, 10-10–10-20, 10-20–10-30, 10-30–10-40, 10-40 and lower). Ten proteins randomly chosen from each category were aligned with the founding members of the LBPB-B group. All the sampled bacterial proteins, irrespective of E-value, had a characteristic LPBP-B type motif organization, shared 25–95% sequence identity with the founding members of the LPBP-B class and had little or no sequence similarity with other PBP-βL classes. This result suggests that LACTB together with the LPBP-B proteins form a distinct class sharing a common ancestry.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-8-26/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_595_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Schematic representation of the organization of the three catalytic site motifs in LACTB and the different PBP-βL classes. A set of founding members of each PBP-βL class (Additional file 1), classified according to Ghuysen 1997, and Massova and Mobashery 1998 [3,4], were used to calculate the median inter-motif distances in number of amino acid residues. Accession numbers refer to the Swiss-Prot database. The catalytic site motifs are highlighted in green and invariant amino acids are higlighted in yellow. Inter-motif distances were measured from the serine in the -SXXK-motif to the serine/lysine and lysine/histidine of the second and third catalytic site motif, respectively. Numbers within brackets is the largest difference from the median value within each class. PBP-βL classes forming separate clades [3] are marked with square brackets. Abbreviations: PBP, penicillin-binding protein.

At present, 3-dimensional structures are available for three LPBP-B class proteins: the Streptomyces D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase [22, 23]; a D-alanyl-D-alanine aminopeptidase from Ochrobactrum anthropii [Swiss-Prot:Q9ZBA9] [25]; and a transesterase from Burkholderia gladioli [Swiss-Prot:Q9KX40] [26]. These three proteins representing different LPBP-B subclasses share an almost identical polypeptide fold consisting of an α/β region and an all-helical region, with the catalytic site located between them. Comparison of the amino acid sequences with the 3-dimensional structures of these LPBP-B proteins revealed several conserved amino acids in structurally critical elements of the polypeptide fold (Additional file 2). Amino acid alignments of LACTB with these LPBP-B proteins showed a high degree of amino acid conservation especially of amino acids in positions corresponding to these structural elements (Additional file 2). Evidently, local structure imposes particularly stringent constraints on substitutions in these positions promoting their conservation through long evolutionary distances. These findings strongly suggest that LACTB and the LPBP-B proteins share a similar polypeptide fold.

The LACTB family comprises four paralogus lineages

Having identified a set of LACTB orthologs we sought to determine the evolutionary relationship with other LACTB family proteins (Table 1). Amino acid sequence comparisons revealed that all LACTB family proteins have a LPBP-B-like motif arrangement and, moreover, share a 17–40% inter-motif sequence identity to human LACTB (Additional file 3). This finding suggests that the LACTB family descended from a common bacterial ancestor protein and then diversified in various metazoan lineages. The most extensive diversification of the LACTB family occurred in nematodes which have eight paralogs, whilst vertebrates harbor two paralogs. In contrast, all insects sequenced to date appear to lack LACTB proteins. To gain further insight into the evolutionary events shaping the LACTB family we performed a phylogenetic analysis.

The PBP-βL domain of thirty-seven metazoan LACTB family proteins, four Dictyostelium LACTB homologs, and ten bacterial LPBP-B proteins were aligned and analyzed by maximum likelihood as described in Methods. The Streptomyces D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase and two related LPBP-B proteins from Salinispora tropica and Bacillus cereus (E < 10-50 against Streptomyces) were included as an outgroup (Table 1). The inferred best tree, shown in Figure 3, indicated that the LACTB family is composed of four groups. We have labeled the groups: (i) LACTB orthologs; (ii) LACTB-like 1; (iii) LACTB-like 2; and (iv) esterase-like proteins (Figure 3). These groups were supported by a bootstrap analysis of one hundred replicates. That the bacterial LPBP-B proteins were intercalated with the different LACTB groups, instead of forming a sister group common to all LACTB groups, suggests that the LACTB family is composed of four distinct alloparalogus protein lineages.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-8-26/MediaObjects/12862_2007_Article_595_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Inferred phylogenetic tree of the PBP-βL domain of LACTB family proteins. An alignment encompassing 266 amino acids was analyzed by maximum likelihood as described in the Materials and Methods section. The log likelihood was -20487.28 and the Γ distribution shape parameter shape parameter used was 2.670. Bootstrap values for nodes supported by more than 85 replicates of 100 are shown. Bacterial proteins are highlighted in yellow.

The LACTB family derives from α-proteobacterial ancestor proteins

LACTB orthologs clustered together with LPBP-B proteins from the free-living α-proteobacteria Maricaulis maris, Oceanicaulis alexandrii, and Sphingopyxis alaskensis. This finding suggests that the progenitor of the LACTB orthologs was acquired from an early α-proteobacterium. Interestingly, the evolutionary scenario appears to be similar for the other LACTB groups. Esterase-like proteins cluster with a putative esterase from Hyphomonas neptunium, the LACTB-like group 1 and 2 proteins cluster with putative peptidases from Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Mesorhizobium loti, respectively. These findings suggest that the progenitors for the LACTB family were acquired simultaneously from an early α-proteobacterium harboring a set of four LPBP-B genes encoding structurally closely related proteins with different biochemical functions. That the LACTB groups cluster with proteins from different α-proteobacterial lineages, may be explained by lineage-specific loss of LPBP-B genes resulting from the extensive genome reductions that has occurred throughout the evolution of α-proteobacteria [27].

While LACTB orthologs have a relatively broad taxon distribution, proteins from the other three lineages are restricted to fewer taxa suggesting that widespread loss of these genes have occurred throughout the eukaryotic evolution. LACTB-like proteins 1 are found only in nematodes suggesting gene loss in all other lineages. In contrast, LACTB-like proteins 2 are abundant in Dictyostelium and comprise several vertebrate proteins, but do not occur in nematodes. The esterase-like proteins comprise five paralogs in nematodes and two in echinoderms, but appears to be missing from all vertebrates sequenced to date.

Conclusion

The PBP-βL family encompasses a large number of highly diversified proteins in bacteria and eukaryotes. While the role of bacterial PBP-βL proteins in peptidoglycan synthesis has been extensively studied, little is known about the function of metazoan PBP-βL family proteins. However, recent findings show that the mammalian mitochondrial PBP-βL homolog LACTB is involved in metabolic signaling [16, 17, 19]. Therefore, clarifying the function of metazoan PBP-βL homologs may reveal novel aspects about the evolution of metazoan energy metabolism and elucidate unknown mechanisms of metabolic regulation.

Our phylogenetic analysis indicated that the LACTB family is divided into four lineages deriving from four separate bacterial LPBP-B subclass genes. These genes were most likely acquired simultaneously from α-proteobacteria by endosymbiotic gene transfer, although other scenarios such as multiple horizontal gene transfers from α-proteobacteria to early organisms of the opistokont lineage can not be completely ruled out. The evolutionary history of the LACTB family is dominated by gene losses resulting in an uneven distribution of LACTB family proteins in metazoan taxa and no extant organism sequenced to date harbor proteins from all four lineages. Extensive diversification of LACTB family proteins appear to have occurred only in Nematodes. Since metazoan organisms lack peptidoglycan the widespread gene loss characterizing the history of the LACTB family may be readily explained by lack of enzymatic substrates. However, this raises the question as to what mechanisms have promoted the conservation of PBP-βL homologs in some eukaryotic lineages.

We speculate that phagocytotic feeding was the primary selection force acting to conserve genes for LPBP-B proteins in early eukaryotes. An early eukaryote organism possessing molecular machineries for both phagocytosis and effective peptidoglycan digestion would harness great benefit in an environment with numerous bacteria. It is thus possible that this hypothetical early eukaryote was endowed not only with the progenitors of the LACTB family proteins but was equipped with a larger complement of PBP-βL proteins and other peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes allowing an efficient and complete hydrolysis of ingested peptidoglycan. Following the diversification of eukaryotes, lineages in which phagocytotic feeding was deselected had no need for peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes and they were consequently lost from the genomes. On the contrary, eukaryote lineages leading to Dictyostelium and Caenorhabditi s, which feed on bacteria, retained the genes for peptidoglycan-digesting enzymes and allowed them to undergo multiple duplications. This scenario implies that LACTB family proteins may also occur in some phagotropic protozoans.

LACTB orthologs are conserved in many metazoan species including all vertebrates currently sequenced. The energy metabolism of vertebrates is intimately linked to the metabolism of the large number of microbes that colonize the intestinal channel. That changes in the relative abundance of intestinal microbes from different taxa directly affects the lipid and carbohydrate metabolism of the host ([28] and references therein) demonstrates the existence of complex gut-microbe-to-host signaling mechanisms relayed by specific microbial metabolites. We hypothesize that LACTB is involved in the metabolism and/or sensing of some product(s) deriving from commensal bacteria. Further metagenomic, cell biological, and biochemical studies will be required to elucidate the function of PBP-βL homologs in metazoan organisms.

Methods

Genomic DNA, expressed sequence tags, and protein databases were searched for nucleotide and amino acid sequences using BLAST 15/10/2006–15/01/2007. The following websites were used; Dictybase [29], DOE Joint Genome Institute [30], J. Craig Venter Institute [31], H-invitational database [32], Human Genome Sequencing Center [33], LumbriBASE [34], National Center for Biotechology Information [35], Washington University School of Medicine Genome Sequencing Center [36], Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute [37], and Wormbase [38].

Orthologs to human LACTB were identified using a modified reciprocal best-hit approach as described [20, 21]. To identify bacterial orthologs each LACTB family protein was used to search the NCBI nr database. Retrieved bacterial proteins were evaluated with the reciprocal best-hit test. Expectancy values (E-value) refer to searches in the NCBI nr sequence database. Binary alignments were made using Dotlet 1.5 [39] and LALIGN [40]. Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences were made using ClustalW and adjusted manually. Amino acid alignments are available upon request.

Phylogenetic maximum likelihood analysis of amino acid alignments was performed in software programs RAxML-VI [41] and proml from the PHYLIP package version 3.66 [42]. The invariant sites were removed from the alignment and the shape parameter of the Γ distribution was estimated using ProtTest [43]. Four Γ distribution classes with the JTT model were used in both programs. Trees were initially inferred in RAxML using the normal hill-climbing search with 100 random addition sequences. The resulting trees were further evaluated in proml, and the one giving the highest likelihood value is presented. The robustness of inferred trees was assessed by nonparametric bootstrapping using programs seqboot, proml, and consense from the PHYLIP package. One hundred replicates was used in the bootstrapping analysis. Like the majority of eukaryotic operational genes with bacterial homologs the LACTB family branched with homologs from Gram negative bacteria while homologs from Gram positive bacteria formed an outgroup. Therefore the Streptomyces sp. D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase [Swiss-Prot:P15555] was used to root the inferred tree.

The probability of mitochondrial import was estimated using Mitoprot mitochondrial targeting sequence prediction [44, 45]. The Prosite [46] nomenclature for amino acid patterns was used.

Abbreviations

LPBP-B: 

low molecular weight penicillin-binding protein class B

PBP-βL: 

penicillin-binding protein and β-lactamase.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Academy of Finland, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Magnus Ehrnrooth foundation, the P. Albin Johansson foundation, and the Svenska Kulturfonden.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Program of Molecular Neurology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki
(2)
Helsinki Biophysics and Biomembrane Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki
(3)
CSC-Scientific Computing Ltd
(4)
Minerva Medical Research Institute, Biomedicum Helsinki
(5)
Androgen Receptor Laboratory, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki

References

  1. Macheboeuf P, Contreras-Martel C, Job V, Dideberg O, Dessen A: Penicillin Binding Proteins: key players in bacterial cell cycle and drug resistance processes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006, 30: 673-691. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00024.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Goffin C, Ghuysen J-M: Biochemistry and Comparative genomics of SxxK Superfamily Acyltransferases Offer a Clue to the Mycobacterial Paradox: Presence of Penicillin-Susceptible Target Proteins versus Lack of Efficiency of Penicillin as Therapeutic Agent. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002, 66: 702-738. 10.1128/MMBR.66.4.702-738.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Massova I, Mobashery S: Kinship and Diversification of Bacterial Penicillin-Binding Protein and β-Lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 1-17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ghuysen J-M: Penicillin-binding proteins. Wall peptidoglycan assembly and resistance to penicillin: facts, doubts and hopes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1997, 8: 45-60. 10.1016/S0924-8579(96)00358-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bush K, Jacoby GA, Medeiros AA: A Functional Classification Scheme for β-Lactamases and Its correlation with Molecular Structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995, 39: 1211-1233.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Massova I, Mobashery S: Structural and Mechanistic Aspects of Evolution of β-Lactamases and Penicillin-Binding Proteins. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 1999, 5: 929-937.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Meroueh SO, Minasov G, Lee W, Shoichet BK, Mobashery S: Structural Aspects for Evolution of β-Lactamases from Penicillin-Binding Proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2003, 125: 9612-9618. 10.1021/ja034861u.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall BG, Barlow M: Structure-Based Phylogenies of the Serine β-Lactamases. J Mol Evol. 2003, 57: 255-260. 10.1007/s00239-003-2473-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith TS, Southan C, Ellington K, Campbell D, Tew DG, Debouck D: Identification, Genomic Organization and mRNA Expression of LACTB, Encoding a Serine β-Lactamase-like Protein with an Amino-terminal Transmembrane Domain. Genomics. 2001, 78: 12-14. 10.1006/geno.2001.6643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Matagne A, Dubus A, Galleni M, Frère J-M: The β-lactamase cycle: a tale of selective pressure and bacterial ingenuity. Nat Prod Rep. 1999, 16: 1-19. 10.1039/a705983c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Liobikas J, Polianskyte Z, Speer O, Thompson J, Alakoskela J-M, Peitsaro N, Franck M, Whitehead MA, Kinnunen PJK, Eriksson O: Expression and purification of the mitochondrial serine protease LACTB as an N-terminal GST fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Prot Pur Expr. 2006, 45: 335-342. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.08.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Koc EC, Burkhart W, Blackburn K, Moyer MB, Schlatzer DM, Mosely A, Spremulli MM: The Large Subunit of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome Analysis of the complement of ribosomal proteins present. J Biol Chem. 2001, 267: 43958-43969. 10.1074/jbc.M106510200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Moota VK, Brunkenborg J, Olsen JV, Hjerrild M, Wisniewski JR, Stahl E, Bolouri MS, Ray HN, Sihag S, Kamal M, Patterson N, Lander ES, Mann M: Integrated Analysis of Protein Composition, Tissue Diversity, and Gene Regulation in Mouse Mitochondria. Cell. 2003, 115: 629-640. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00926-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylor SW, Fahy E, Zhang B, Glenn GM, Warnock DE, Wiley S, Murphy AN, Gaucher SP, Capaldi RA, Gibson BW, Ghosh SS: Characterization of the human heart mitochondrial proteome. Nature Biotech. 2003, 21: 281-286. 10.1038/nbt793.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Forner F, Arriaga EA, Mann M: Mild Protease Treatment as a Small-Scale Biochemical Method for Mitochondria Purification and Proteomic Mapping of Cytoplasm-Exposed Mitochondrial Proteins. J Proteom Res. 2006, 5: 3277-3287. 10.1021/pr060361z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Rome S, Clément K, Rabsa-Lhoret R, Loizon E, Poitou C, Barsh GS, Riou J-P, Laville M, Vidal H: Microarray Profiling of Human Skeletal Muscle Reveals That Insulin Regulates ~800 Genes during a Hyperinsulinemic Clamp. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 18063-18068. 10.1074/jbc.M300293200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim SC, Sprung R, Chen Y, Xu Y, Ball H, Pei J, Cheng T, Kho Y, Xiao H, Grishin NV, White M, Yang X-J, Zhao Y: Substrate and Functional Diversity of Lysine Acetylataion Revealed by a Proteomics Survey. Mol Cell. 2006, 23: 607-618. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.06.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwer B, Brunkenborg J, Verdin RO, Anderson JS, Verdin E: Reversible lysine acetylation controls the activity of the mitochondrial enzyme acetyl-CoA synthetase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 10224-10229. 10.1073/pnas.0603968103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee J, Xy Y, Chen Y, Sprung R, Kim SC, Xe S, Zhao Y: Mitochondrial Phosphoproteome Revealed by an Improved IMAC Method and MS/MS/MS. Mol Cell Proteom. 2007, 6: 669-676. 10.1074/mcp.M600218-MCP200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mushegian AR, Koonin EV: A minimal gene set for cellular life derived by comparison of complete bacterial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 10268-10273. 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10268.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wall DP, Fraser HB, Hirsh AE: Detecting putative orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1710-1711. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelly JA, Knox JR, Zhao H, Frère J-M, Ghuysen J-M: Crystalligraphic Mapping of β-Lactams Bound to a D-alanyl-D-alanyl peptidase target enzyme. J Mol Biol. 1989, 209: 281-295. 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90277-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly JA, Kuzin AP: The Refined Crystallographic Structure of a DD-Peptidase Penicillin-target Enzyme at 16 Å Resolution. J Mol Biol. 1995, 254: 223-236. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Sorokin AW, Mirkin BG, Koonin EV: Remarkable Interkingdom Conservation of Intron Positions and Massive, Lineage-Specific Intron Loss and Gain in Eukaryotic Evolution. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 1512-1517. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00558-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bompard-Gilles C, Remaut H, Villert V, Prangé T, Fanuel L, Delmarcelle M, Frère J, Van Beeumen J: Crystal structure of a D-aminopeptidase from Ochrobactrum anthropi, a new member of the 'penicillin-recognizing enzyme' family. Structure. 2000, 8 (9): 917-980.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wagner UG, Petersen EI, Schwab H, Kratky C: EstB from Burkholderia gladioli: A novel esterase with a β-lactamase fold reveals steric factors to discriminate between esterolytic and β-lactam cleaving activity. Prot Sci. 2002, 11: 467-478. 10.1110/ps.33002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bossau B, Karlberg EO, Frank C, Legault B-A, Andersson SGE: Computational inference of scenarios for a-proteobacterial genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 26: 9722-9727. 10.1073/pnas.0400975101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RL, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI: An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006, 444: 1027-1031. 10.1038/nature05414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dictybase. [http://dictybase.org]
  30. DOE Joint Genome Institute. [http://www.jgi.doe.gov]
  31. J. Craig Venter Institute. [http://www.tigr.org]
  32. H-invitational database. [http://h-invitational.jp]
  33. Human Genome Sequencing Center. [http://www.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu]
  34. LumbriBASE. [http://www.earthworms.org]
  35. National Center for Biotechology Information. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
  36. Washington University School of Medicine Genome Sequencing Center. [http://www.genome.wustl.edu/genome_group_index.cgi]
  37. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. [http://www.sanger.ac.uk]
  38. Wormbase. [http://www.wormbase.org]
  39. Dotlet 1.5. [http://myhits.isb-sib.ch/cgi-bin/dotlet]
  40. [http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/LALIGN_form.html]
  41. Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H: RAxML III: A Fast Program for Maximum Likelihood-based Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 456-463. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Felsenstein J: Phylip, Phylogenetic Inference Package Distributed by the author. 1993, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  43. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D: ProtTest: Selection of the best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 2104-2105. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Claros MG, Vincens P: Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. Eur J Biochem. 1996, 241: 770-786. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00779.x.Google Scholar
  45. Mitoprot. [http://ihg.gsf.de/ihg/mitoprot.html]
  46. Prosite. [http://au.expasy.org/prosite]
  47. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson E, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, Chang JL, Kulbokas III EJ, Zody MC, Mauceli E, Xie X, Breen M, Wayne RK, Ostrander EA, Ponting CP, Galibert F, Smith DR, deJong PJ, Kirkness E, Alvarez P, Biagi T, Brockman W, Butler J, Chin C-W, Cook A, Cuff J, Daly MJ, DeCaprio D, Gnerre S, Grabherr M, Kellis M, Kleber M, Bardeleben C, Goodstadt L, Heger A, Hitte C, Kim L, Koepfli K-P, Parker HG, Pollinger JP, Searle SM, Sutter NB, Thomas R, Webber C, Broad Institute Genome Sequencing Platform, Lander ES: Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005, 438: 803-819. 10.1038/nature04338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Caldwell RB, Kierzek AM, Arakawa H, Bezzubov Y, Zaim J, Fiedler P, Kutter S, Blagodatski A, Kostivska D, Koter M, Plachy J, Carnici P, Hayashizaki Y, Buerstedde J-M: Full-length cDNAs from chicken bursal lymphocytes to facilitate gene function analysis. Genome Biol. 2004, 6: R6-10.1186/gb-2004-6-1-r6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jaillon O, Aury J-M, Brinet F, Petit J-L, Stange-Thomann N, Mauceli E, Bouneau L, Fischer C, Ozoef-Costaz C, Bernot A, Nicaud S, Jaffe D, Fisher S, Lutfalla G, Dossat C, Segurens B, Dasilva C, Salanoubat M, Levy M, Boudet N, Castellano S, Anthouard V, Jubin C, Castelli V, Katinka M, Vacherie B, Biémont C, Skalli Z, Cattolico L, Poulain J, de Berardinis V, Cruaud C, Duprat S, Brottier P, Coutanceau J-P, Gouzy J, Parra G, Lardier G, Chapple C, McKernan KJ, McEwan P, Bosak S, Kellis M, Volff J-N, Guigó R, Zody MC, Mesirov J, Lindblad-Toh K, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Kahn D, Robinson-Rechavi M, Laudet V, Schachter V, Quétier F, Saurin W, Scarpelli C, Wincker P, Lander ES, Weissenbach J, Crollius HR: Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature. 2004, 431: 946-957. 10.1038/nature03025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Dehal P, Satou Y, Campbell RK, Chapman J, Degnan B, De Tomaso A, Davidsom B, Di Gregorio A, Gelpke M, Goodstein DM, Harafuji N, Hastings KEM, Ho I, Hotta K, Huang W, Kawashima T, Lemaire P, Martinez D, Meinertzhagen IA, Necula S, Nonaka M, Putnam N, Rash S, Saiga H, Satake M, Terry A, Yamada L, Wang H-G, Awazu S, Azumi K, Boore J, Branno M, Chin-bow S, DeSantis R, Doyle S, Francino P, Keys DN, Haga S, Hayashi H, Hino K, Imai KS, Inaba K, Kano S, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi M, Lee B-I, Makabe KW, Manohar C, Matassi G, Medina M, Mochizuki Y, Mount S, Morishita T, Miura S, Nakayama A, Nishizaka S, Nomoto H, Ohta F, Oishi K, Rigoutsos I, Sano M, Sasaki A, Sasakura Y, Shoguchi E, Shin-i T, Spagnuolo A, Stainier D, Suzuki MM, Tassy O, Takatori N, Tokuoka M, Yagi K, Yoshizaki F, Wada S, Zhang C, Hyatt PD, Larimer F, Detter C, Doggett N, Glavina T, Hawkins T, Richardson P, Lucas S, Kohara Y, Levine M, Satoh N, Rokhsar DS: The Draft Genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into Chordate and Vertebrate Origins. Science. 2002, 298: 2157-2167. 10.1126/science.1080049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stein LD, Bao Z, Blasiar D, Blumenthal T, Brent MR, Chen N, Chinwalla A, Clarke L, Clee C, Coghlan A, Coulson A, D'Eustachio P, Fitch DHA, Fulton LA, Fulton RE, Griffiths-Jones S, Harris TW, Hillier LW, Kamath R, Kuwabara PE, Mardis ER, Marra MA, Miner TL, Minx P, Mullikin JC, Plumb RW, Rogers J, Schein JE, Sohrmann M, Spieth J, Stajich JE, Wei C, Willey D, Wilson RK, Durbin R, Waterston RH: The Genome Sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A platform for Comparative Genomics. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1: 166-192. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. [CSC] The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium: Genome Sequence of the Nematode C elegans: A platform for Investing Biology. Science. 1998, 282: 2012-2018. 10.1126/science.282.5396.2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Eichinger L, Pachebat JA, Glöckner G, Rajandream M-A, Sucgang R, Berriman M, Song J, Olsen R, Szafranski K, Xu Q, Tunggal B, Kummerfeld S, Madera M, Konfortov BA, Rivero F, Bankier AT, Lehmann R, Hamlin N, Davies R, Gaudet P, Fey P, Pilcher K, Chen G, Saunders D, Sodergren E, Davis P, Kerhornou A, Nie X, Hall N, Anjard C, Hemphill L, Bason N, Farbrother P, Desany B, Just E, Morio T, Rost R, Churcher C, Cooper J, Haydock S, van Driessche N, Cronin A, Goodhead I, Muzny D, Mourier T, Pain A, Lu M, Harper D, Lindsay R, Hauser H, James K, Quiles M, Babu MM, Saito T, Buchrieser C, Wardroper A, Felder M, Thangavelu M, Johnson D, Knights A, Loulseged H, Mungall K, Oliver K, Price C, Quail MA, Urushihara H, Hernandez J, Rabbinowitsch E, Steffen D, Sanders M, Ma J, Kohara Y, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Spiegler S, Tivey A, Sugano S, White B, Walker D, Woodward J, Winckler T, Tanaka Y, Shaulsky G, Schleicher M, Weinstock G, Rosenthal A, Cox EC, Chisholm RL, Gibbs R, Loomis WF, Platzer M, Williams RRKJ, Dear PH, Noegel AA, Barrell B, Kuspa A: The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature. 2005, 435: 43-57. 10.1038/nature03481.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Peitsaro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.