Skip to main content

Table 2 Pairwise differences between populations for nuclear microsatellites (FST) above diagonal; and mtDNA (Net mean number of substitutions per site under Jukes-Cantor), below diagonal

From: Integrating phylogeographic patterns of microsatellite and mtDNA divergence to infer the evolutionary history of chamois (genus Rupicapra)

 

parva

pyrenaica

ornata

cartusiana

rupicapraW

rupicapraC

rupicapraE

tatrica

carpatica

balcanica

asiatica

caucasica

parva

 

14.31

51.43

42.51

33.31

 

35.65

48.42

45.05

36.41

40.10

42.27

pyrenaica

0.65

 

50.18

44.22

33.59

 

35.64

48.36

45.84

37.29

39.83

43.22

ornata

4.42

4.58

 

70.91

50.41

 

59.68

77.14

67.21

64.23

93.12

69.46

cartusiana

4.24

4.54

1.15

 

11.31

 

20.16

36.58

34.67

18.42

44.31

29.22

rupicapraW

0.52

0.32

4.13

4.01

  

6.35

24.99

20.38

11.18

17.73

13.85

rupicapraC

4.81

4.98

5.81

5.46

3.94

       

rupicapraE

4.67

4.80

5.72

5.37

3.74

0.15

 

29.06

22.73

12.53

19.21

16.23

tatrica

4.59

4.89

5.42

5.11

3.85

1.11

0.77

 

25.55

21.81

47.36

38.35

carpatica

4.81

5.11

5.41

5.10

4.06

1.15

0.86

0.86

 

22.52

31.71

27.23

balcanica

4.17

4.46

5.02

4.87

3.43

0.91

0.85

0.98

0.68

 

16.38

20.43

asiatica

4.84

4.97

6.01

5.83

4.05

1.47

0.83

1.57

1.32

1.33

 

20.61

caucasica

4.42

4.72

5.51

5.40

3.71

1.20

0.34

1.05

1.00

0.98

0.51

Â