Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Statistical comparisons among 15 alternative tree topologies of the four more derived suborders using AU test

From: Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective

Treea Diff -ln L P
(Og,(An,(Ch,Ce))) b 0.0 0.589
((Og,An)(Ch,Ce)) c 0.0 0.577
(An,(Og,(Ch,Ce))) 0.5 0.520
(Og,(Ce,(An,Ch))) 22.4 0.030
(Og,(Ch,(An,Ce))) 27.5 0.006
(An,(Ce,(Ch,Og))) 42.5 0.015
(An,(Ch,(Og,Ce))) d 43.8 0.002
((An,Ch)(Og,Ce)) 47.9 0.000
(Ce,(Og,(An,Ch))) 48.9 0.000
((An,Ce)(Ch,Og)) 49.7 0.002
(Ch,(Og,(An,Ce))) 50.4 0.000
(Ch,(Ce,(An,Og))) 53.2 0.004
(Ce,(Ch,(An,Og))) 54.2 0.008
(Ce,(An,(Og,Ch))) 54.6 0.000
(Ch,(An,(Og,Ce))) 55.1 0.002
  1. a Ogcocephaloidei (Og); Antennarioidei (An); Chaunacoidei (Ch); Ceratioidei (Ce). The most basal Lophioidei was excluded from the comparisons
  2. b The best-scoring ML tree derived from 12n3rRTn (Figure 5) and 12nRTn datasets.
  3. c The best-scoring ML tree derived from 123nRTn dataset.
  4. d Morphology-based hypothesis [3]