- Research article
- Open Access
Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours
© Iwata et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 17 May 2011
Accepted: 10 August 2011
Published: 10 August 2011
Sperm cells are the target of strong sexual selection that may drive changes in sperm structure and function to maximize fertilisation success. Sperm evolution is regarded to be one of the major consequences of sperm competition in polyandrous species, however it can also be driven by adaptation to the environmental conditions at the site of fertilization. Strong stabilizing selection limits intra-specific variation, and therefore polymorphism, among fertile sperm (eusperm). Here we analyzed reproductive morphology differences among males employing characteristic alternative mating behaviours, and so potentially different conditions of sperm competition and fertilization environment, in the squid Loligo bleekeri.
Large consort males transfer smaller (average total length = 73 μm) sperm to a female's internal sperm storage location, inside the oviduct; whereas small sneaker males transfer larger (99 μm) sperm to an external location around the seminal receptacle near the mouth. No significant difference in swimming speed was observed between consort and sneaker sperm. Furthermore, sperm precedence in the seminal receptacle was not biased toward longer sperm, suggesting no evidence for large sperm being favoured in competition for space in the sperm storage organ among sneaker males.
Here we report the first case, in the squid Loligo bleekeri, where distinctly dimorphic eusperm are produced by different sized males that employ alternative mating behaviours. Our results found no evidence that the distinct sperm dimorphism was driven by between- and within-tactic sperm competition. We propose that presence of alternative fertilization environments with distinct characteristics (i.e. internal or external), whether or not in combination with the effects of sperm competition, can drive the disruptive evolution of sperm size.
Postcopulatory sexual selection can occur in situations where females mate with more than one male and ejaculated spermatozoa compete for fertilization . Because sperm traits have a direct impact on fertilization success, they are subject to strong postcopulatory sexual selection forces in polyandrous species . Theoretical models suggest that the pressures of sperm competition and cryptic female choice will drive sperm evolution towards an optimal morphology . In support of this prediction inter-male variation of sperm morphology in birds is negatively associated with the level of sperm competition . Similarly, in Drosophila sperm length coevolves with the length of the female reproductive tract as paternity bias is selected by female morphology , and so an optimal sperm morphology that fits with the majority of female reproductive morphologies would be selected, resulting in reduced intra-specific diversity in sperm morphology.
Sperm competition theory predicts that sperm size is influenced by the intensity of sperm competition among males [reviewed in ], with either larger or smaller sperm favoured depending on the underlying assumptions . Empirical studies support this prediction in a range of taxa including insects , amphibians , fish [9, 10], birds  and mammals [12, 13], although recent studies have found no clear link between sperm size and sperm competition intensity, when considered the phylogenetic relationships [14–16]. However, definitive tests of the predictions from sperm competition theory using empirical data have been mostly restricted to comparisons between related species with different levels of polyandry or gonadosomatic index. Intra-specific tests are possible where alternative male reproductive tactics, in which consort males guard females and sneaker males steal fertilizations from consort males, result in biased sperm competition risk among males . Previous studies have tested if differing sperm competition risk leads to different sperm size between tactics, but only one study supported the prediction that sneaker males have longer sperm than consort males . However, even in this study the difference in sperm sizes is thought to be attributable to more variable sperm length within consort males and due to a few consort individuals having unusually short sperm .
Aside from the effects of sperm competition, adaptation to fertilization environments can be predicted to have an impact on the evolution of sperm traits. Species displaying internal or external fertilization will employ quite different mating strategies, and therefore sperm traits. Differing physiological conditions in fertilization site in terrestrial or aquatic mating habitats have been shown to influence the evolution of sperm size in frogs . As sperm evolution theory has mainly been driven by comparative analysis among related species, the effects of differences in fertilization environments in driving sperm trait evolution have been often overlooked in previous studies.
Due to the process of egg laying in L. bleekeri, insemination and fertilization can therefore occur in two sites under different environmental conditions: a string of eggs is extruded from the oviduct (inside the mantle cavity) where it is exposed to consort sperm inside the oviduct (i.e. internal fertilization conditions), and the female pulls the egg string through her siphon and into position within her arm crown around the mouth, where it is exposed to sneaker sperm (i.e. external fertilization conditions), before she deposits the egg string onto the sea bed. The different fertilization environments can be predicted to lead to different optimal outcomes for sperm size evolution. Here we investigate the first example of dimorphic fertile sperm within a species, which is associated with alternative male mating tactics and alternative fertilisation environments.
Motility and number of sperm
We measured swimming velocity of both type of sperm and found no difference between sneakers and consorts (consort curvilinear velocity = 167.7 ± 36.9 μm/s, n = 6, 1421 cells; sneaker velocity = 167.1 ± 33.5 μm/s, n = 3, 619 cells; Mean ± SE, Student's t-test, P = 0.745).
This is the first reported case of discrete dimorphism of fertile sperm (eusperm) exhibited between individuals within a species. A few previous studies have suggested that sperm morphology is influenced by different sperm competition risks associated with different male mating tactics [18, 26], although the observed differences in sperm morphology between tactics are small compared to large variation within a tactic. Why is much greater (and highly significant) divergent evolution of sperm morphology evident among males of the squid L. bleekeri? First, it is possible that sperm competition does not operate under a "fair raffle" system  between consort and sneaker males due to storage site-dependent sperm precedence towards consorts (between-tactic sperm competition). As consort sperm, released in the oviduct, have access to the oocytes earlier than sneaker sperm, stored in the external location, sneaker sperm might be predicted to possess increased swimming speed (and so size) to offset the consort sperm advantage. Increased motility can be an effective strategy as time from insemination until sperm-egg fusion may be sufficiently long to allow sneaker sperm to compete, as observed in the frog Rana temporaria in which sneaker (pirate) males ejaculate onto a deposited egg mass after it has already been inseminated by a guarding male, but still achieve a mean fertilization success of 24.1% . A positive relationship between sperm size and swimming velocity has been found in many animals [9, 29], although there are a few exceptions [10, 14], and sperm swimming velocity is positively related to fertilization success in species both with internal and external fertilization [30, 31]. We tested L. bleekeri sperm swimming velocity and found no difference between sneakers and consorts, suggesting that this factor is unlikely to explain the size dimorphism.
A second possible explanation for dimorphic sperm would be strong selection among sperm from sneaker males competing for space in the seminal receptacle (within-tactic sperm competition). Larger sperm would have an advantage in occupying spaces within the seminal receptacle to exclude, and so outcompete, smaller sperm [5, 32]. In this case, the size distribution of sperm stored in the seminal receptacle would be expected to be biased upwards compared to that found in the original sperm populations. Contrary to this prediction, the size distribution of sperm stored in the seminal receptacle was not different from that in sneaker spermatophores or in sperm masses attached around the female's mouth, suggesting that this factor also is unlikely to explain the size dimorphism
A third explanation for dimorphic sperm would be divergent selection pressures on sperm from different male mating types as a consequence of adaptation to different fertilization environments (internal versus external). Males adopting different mating tactics are expected to maximize fitness in different ways, in the context of reproductive energy expenditure as a trade-off between sperm size and number. In some examples of consort versus sneaker male strategies, sneaker males produce relatively larger numbers of sperm than consorts to offset the positional mating advantage of consorts [17, 18]. Contrary to this expectation, in L. bleekeri the number of spermatozoa within a single spermatophore was estimated to be ~5-fold greater in consorts than in sneakers (Figure 4). The different sperm size versus number strategies employed by sneakers and consorts, running contrary to expectations under simple sperm competition, suggests that fertilization environment (the other major difference between sneaker and consort strategies) may be an important factor in determining the sperm size/number trade-off in this species. Aside from the obvious factor of water movement (i.e. risk of sperm dilution), there may be many differences between external and internal fertilization environments (such as salinity, viscosity, pH and concentrations of gases and nutrients) that may affect fertilization success by different sized sperm. Although there have been a number of cases reported, across diverse taxa, of species exhibiting alternative male mating tactics, there has been no clear evidence of sperm dimorphism between sneaker and consort males [18, 33, 34]. The common factor among these previous studies is that despite sperm from each tactic facing different sperm competition conditions arising from different male competition behaviours, courtship behaviours, mating order, mating duration and sperm expenditure , how and where released sperm meet with eggs (i.e. fertilization environments) are basically the same among competing males. Given the accepted importance of sperm competition in the evolution of male mating strategies (including individual and sperm morphology, physiology and behaviour), it is likely that sperm competition is also a strong selective agent in the evolution of sperm and ejaculate characteristics in L. bleekeri, perhaps in optimizing these characteristics for each insemination/fertilization site. However, viewing previous observations together with the data presented here, it can be proposed that fertilization environment has a predominant adaptive significance for sperm size diversification in L. bleekeri and other species.
In conclusion, postcopulatory sexual selection under strong constraints associated with alternative mating tactics can drive discrete sperm polymorphism. Although alternative mating tactics can create differences in sperm competition risk, in the squid L. bleekeri they also produce different fertilization opportunities conditioned by the internal versus external environment. At the moment the mechanisms by which sperm polymorphism has evolved remain elusive. However, our study illustrates that L. bleekeri constitutes a fascinating and suitable model system for answering such questions in evolutionary biology, behavioural ecology and sexual reproduction.
Handling of animals
For sperm size measurements and bioassays, mature Loligo bleekeri were collected at Miura (Sagami-bay, Kanagawa) or Matsumae (southeast Hokkaido Island), Japan, and transported to the laboratory at 4°C within 48 h. Adult males produce spermatophores, which are cylindrical capsules containing mature sperm. Consort males and sneaker males can be distinguished by measuring the mantle and spermatophore lengths. Spermatophore length shows discrete dimorphism associated with mating tactics [; Figure 4a]. To allay the suggestion that the two types of males may represent a cryptic species complex, we sequenced a 776 base pair region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene (Additional file 1). Haplotype frequencies and genetic distances among 27 consort and 29 sneaker males, sampled from both study populations at Miura and Matsumae, show no significant genetic differences, suggesting no reproductive isolation between consort and sneaker male populations.
For artificial fertilization experiments, we used live mature squid commercially fished at Miura, Japan, in April and May. Each female was put in a plastic bag filled with fresh seawater, saturated with O2 and transported to the laboratory within 30 min. Squid were maintained at 15°C in aquaria at the Misaki Marine Biological Station, University of Tokyo.
Sperm length measurements
Spermatozoa were released from spermatophores in a 1.5 ml tube containing 200 μl of seawater, followed by 1-h incubation on ice to recover the concentrated sperm suspension. A volume of 100 μl of the upper layer, which contained enriched swim-up sperm and less cell debris, was transferred to a fresh 1.5 ml tube and fixed with an equal volume of 4% formaldehyde-containing seawater. The samples were observed by DIC microscopy (Nikon) and photomicrographs were taken at 200× magnification using a CCD camera (Keyence). DIC images were analyzed with NIH ImageJ to measure head and flagellar length. We measured 20 sperm per individual from 30 consort and 30 sneaker males. During the breeding season, females often carry the sperm masses attached by males to specific sites on their body. The sperm masses found in different parts of the female body (inside the oviduct, and inside and outside of the seminal receptacle below the mouth) were isolated surgically, minced in a 1.5 ml test tube containing 200 μl seawater and subjected to the same procedure described above. Twenty samples were collected from each sperm storage site, and 20 sperm were measured per sample.
Sperm fertility test by in vitro artificial insemination
We tested fertilization competence in combinations between 3 females and 8 consort and 8 sneaker males collected at Miura. The following method was developed by modifying a protocol previously reported for other squid species . Spermatophores were removed from the male's Needham's sac (male reproductive accessory organ, where mature spermatophores are stored) and were stimulated to ejaculate the sperm mass. Spermatozoa released naturally from the sperm mass were motile, and were used for in vitro fertilization assays. Mature oocytes were obtained from the oviduct and placed in a 35-mm diameter Petri dish in the absence of seawater. Approximately 200 oocytes per dish were inseminated with 100~200 μl of sperm suspension followed by gentle stirring with a plastic spatula. Five minutes after insemination, the dishes were filled with seawater and kept at 15°C. After 30 min, excess sperm were removed and replaced with fresh seawater several times as a washing step, and then incubated at 15°C. Fertilization success was determined by the presence or absence of cleavage planes in the animal hemisphere of the egg after 12-h incubation. At least 50 eggs were scored using a stereomicroscope. Normal embryonic development was confirmed by Hoechst 33342 stain (5 μg/ml) of 4% formaldeyde-fixed specimens after 24-h culture and photographed under a UV fluorescent microscope.
Sperm swimming velocity was measured by SMAS (Sperm Motility Analysis System, Ditect, Tokyo, Japan), which automatically tracks mobile sperm under the microscope and calculates motility parameters (curvilinear velocity along sperm swimming path per sec).
Sperm number in a spermatophore
We measured sperm number contained within the spermatophores using fluorescence intensity of stained sperm lysates. To examine the integrity and heterogeneity of nuclear DNA in the sperm population, microscopic and flow-cytometric analyses were performed. Spermatozoa released from spermatophores were fixed with an equal volume of 4% formaldehyde-containing seawater (pH 7.9), rinsed twice with seawater after 30-min incubation, and stained with propidium iodide (PI) in seawater at a final concentration of 50 μg/ml for 30 min. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that PI-staining was specific to the sperm head and homogenous within the population. PI-stained spermatozoa were then suspended in 300 μl of PBS and flow-cytometric analysis was performed by acquiring at least 15,000 gated events per sample obtained from consort (n = 10) and sneaker (n = 9) males (Ex. 488 nm, Em. 607 nm; Cell Lab Quanta SC, Beckman Coulter, Tokyo, Japan).
The sperm masses discharged from single spermatophores, by cutting the center of the amber ejaculatory apparatus, were recovered in 1.5-ml tubes. Thereafter, they were dissolved in 1 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 9.5, 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K) at 37°C with vigorous shaking for 12 h. The lysates were then diluted (2- to 10-fold) with lysis buffer to obtain a series of different sperm concentrations and a standard calibration curve between the fluorescence intensity versus sperm concentrations. Analysis of DNA content in 100 μl aliquots of the sperm lysate was performed with a genomic DNA quantitation kit (Molecular Probes, FluoReporter Blue Fluorometric dsDNA Quantitation kit) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A standard curve was made using a series of lysate dilutions and calibrated against the original sperm suspensions using a hemocytometer.
Linear mixed models (LMMs) are used when analyzing hierarchical data assuming normally distributed errors, for example to account for repeat sampling of the same individuals . We constructed LMMs using sperm size as dependent variable and category of sperm populations (consort vs. sneaker) as fixed effect. We also constructed separate LMMs using categories (consort vs. sperm stored in oviduct, and sneaker vs. sperm stored in seminal receptacle vs. sperm in masses attached around seminal receptacle) as fixed effect, to confirm if the sperm in each storage site on the female is associated with the alternative male mating tactics. Sample identity (male individual or sperm mass attached to female) was set as a random effect in the models. The significance of the fixed effects on dependent variables, such as mating tactic or sperm storage site, was assessed with the likelihood ratio test, using the log-likelihood of the test model (including fixed effect) and the null model (without fixed effect). We used the ''lme4'' package in R® 2.7.1 software  to run the LMMs analyses.
We thank V. D. Vacquier for discussions and help with the manuscript. We thank S. A. Baba, Y. Sakurai, Y. Watanabe, M. Yoshida, N. Osafune, Y. Ozawa, A. Solis, K. Inaba, K. Chiba, the Misaki MBS, the Shimoda MBS and the Tateyama MBS for their technical support. This work was supported by an EU Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship to Y.I., a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellowship to Y.I., a Narishige Zoological Science Award to N.H., and an RHUL RSF Award to P.S. This work was carried out in part as a joint-research in Japanese Association for Marine Biology (JAMBIO).
- Parker GA: Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev. 1970, 45: 525-567. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Birkhead TR, Hosken D, Pitnick S: Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective. 2009, London: Academic pressGoogle Scholar
- Parker GA: Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1993, 253: 245-254. 10.1098/rspb.1993.0110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calhim S, Immler S, Birkhead TR: Postcopulatory Sexual selection is associated with reduced variation in sperm morphology. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e413-10.1371/journal.pone.0000413.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miller GT, Pitnick S: Sperm-Female Coevolution in Drosophila. Science. 2002, 298: 1230-1233. 10.1126/science.1076968.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snook RR: Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005, 20: 46-53. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gage MJG: Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1994, 258: 247-254. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Byrne PG, Simmons LW, Roberts JD: Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2003, 270: 2079-2086. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2433.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fitzpatrick JL, Montgomerie R, Desjardins JK, Stiver KA, Kolm N, Balshine S: Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2009, 103: 15113-15117.Google Scholar
- Stockley P, Gage MJG, Parker GA, Møller AP: Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculation characteristics. Am Nat. 1997, 149: 933-954. 10.1086/286031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Briskie JV, Mongomerie R: Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1992, 247: 89-95. 10.1098/rspb.1992.0013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gomendio M, Roldan ERS: Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1991, 243: 181-185. 10.1098/rspb.1991.0029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson MJ, Dixson AS: Motility and midpiece in primates. Nature. 2002, 416: 496-10.1038/416496a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hosken DJ: Sperm competition in bats. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1997, 264: 385-392. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0055.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montgomerie R, Fitzpatrick JL: Testes, sperm, and sperm competition. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Fishes. Edited by: Jamieson BGM. 2008, Enfield: Science Publishers, 1-53.Google Scholar
- Gage MJG, Freckleton RP: Relative testis size and sperm morphometry across mammals: no evidence for an association between sperm competition and sperm length. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2003, 270: 625-632. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parker GA: Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1990, 242: 127-133. 10.1098/rspb.1990.0115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simmons LW, Tomkins JL, Hunt J: Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1999, 266: 145-150. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0614.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR: Sperm morphological diversity. Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective. Edited by: Birkhead TR, Hosken D, Pitnick S. 2009, London: Academic press, 69-149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanlon RT, Messenger JB: Cephalopod Behaviour. 1996, Cambridge:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Hanlon RT, Maxwell MR, Shashar N: Behavioral dynamics that would lead to multiple paternity within egg capsules of the squid Loligo pealei. Biol Bull. 1997, 193: 212-214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanlon RT, Smale MJ, Sauer WHH: The mating system of the squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii (Cephalopoda, Mollusca) off South Africa: fighting, guarding, sneaking, mating and egg laying behavior. Bull Mar Sci. 2002, 71: 331-345.Google Scholar
- Iwata Y, Munehara H, Sakurai Y: Dependence of paternity rates on alternative reproductive behaviors in the squid Loligo bleekeri. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005, 298: 219-228.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iwata Y, Sakurai Y: Threshold dimorphism in ejaculate characteristics in the squid Loligo bleekeri. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007, 345: 141-146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Natsukari Y, Tashiro M: Neritic squid resources and cuttlefish resources in Japan. Mar Behav Physiol. 1991, 18: 149-226. 10.1080/10236249109378785.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Immler S, Pryke SR, Birkhead TR, Griffith SC: Pronounced within-individual plasticity in sperm morphometry across social environments. Evolution. 2010, 64: 1634-1643. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00924.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parker GA: Sperm Competition Games: Raffles and Roles. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1990, 242: 120-126. 10.1098/rspb.1990.0114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vieites DR, Nieto-Roma'n S, Barluenga M, Palanca A, Vences M, Meyer A: Post-mating clutch piracy in an amphibian. Nature. 2004, 431: 305-308. 10.1038/nature02879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomendio M, Roldan ERS: Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. Int J Dev Biol. 2008, 52: 439-447. 10.1387/ijdb.082595mg.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG: Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: 44-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birkhead TR, Martínez JG, Burke T, Froman DP: Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1999, 266: 1759-1764. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0843.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- LaMunyon CW, Ward S: Larger sperm outcompete smaller sperm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1998, 265: 1997-2002. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ: Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. 2008, Cambridge, Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leach B, Montgomerie R: Sperm characteristics associated with different male reproductive tactics in bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol Socobiol. 2000, 49: 31-37. 10.1007/s002650000268.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakurai Y, Young RE, Hirota J, Mangold K, Vecchione M, Clarke MR, Bower JR: Artificial fertilization and development through hatching in the oceanic squids Ommastrephes bartramii and Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae). Veliger. 1995, 38: 185-191.Google Scholar
- Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS: Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009, 24: 127-135. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2008, Vienna, R foundation for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.