- Research article
- Open Access
Genomic lineages of Rhizobium etli revealed by the extent of nucleotide polymorphisms and low recombination
© Acosta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 1 June 2011
- Accepted: 17 October 2011
- Published: 17 October 2011
Most of the DNA variations found in bacterial species are in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), but there is some debate regarding how much of this variation comes from mutation versus recombination. The nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacteria Rhizobium etli is highly variable in both genomic structure and gene content. However, no previous report has provided a detailed genomic analysis of this variation at nucleotide level or the role of recombination in generating diversity in this bacterium. Here, we compared draft genomic sequences versus complete genomic sequences to obtain reliable measures of genetic diversity and then estimated the role of recombination in the generation of genomic diversity among Rhizobium etli.
We identified high levels of DNA polymorphism in R. etli, and found that there was an average divergence of 4% to 6% among the tested strain pairs. DNA recombination events were estimated to affect 3% to 10% of the genomic sample analyzed. In most instances, the nucleotide diversity (π) was greater in DNA segments with recombinant events than in non-recombinant segments. However, this degree of recombination was not sufficiently large to disrupt the congruence of the phylogenetic trees, and further evaluation of recombination in strains quartets indicated that the recombination levels in this species are proportionally low.
Our data suggest that R. etli is a species composed of separated lineages with low homologous recombination among the strains. Horizontal gene transfer, particularly via the symbiotic plasmid characteristic of this species, seems to play an important role in diversity but the lineages maintain their evolutionary cohesiveness.
- Homologous Recombination
- Recombination Event
- Draft Genome
- Draft Genome Sequence
- Average Nucleotide Identity
Bacterial species typically contain large amounts of genetic variation in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which originate by mutation and have dynamics that depend on the balance between natural selection and genetic drift [1, 2]. There is some debate on whether or not most of these polymorphisms are selectively neutral at the molecular level . Species have been genetically defined through the analysis of DNA variation using comparative techniques such as hybridization, the sequencing of gene markers, and (more recently) complete genome sequences [4, 5]. It has been proposed that similarity values greater than 70% obtained in DNA-DNA hybridization experiments are sufficient to define a coherent group of organisms as belonging to the same species . These estimates are very rough, subject to experimental variation, and they only indirectly measure similarity (i.e. via hybridization efficiency) . A comparative analysis of complete genomes minimizes most of these limitations. Several measures of genomic relatedness, such as the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and the Maximal Unique Matches (MUM) have been proposed for such analyses [8, 9]. Both ANI and MUM are based on pairwise nucleotide comparisons of complete genomes, and several reports have shown good correlations between the results from these analyses and other measures of genetic relatedness, such as those based on Multilocus Sequencing Typing (MLST), 16S sequencing, and gene content . However, these comparative methods rely on the availability of complete genome sequences and are affected by the quality of the DNA sequencing data, which in the case of draft genomes might not be optimal . The latter issue has not been thoroughly addressed in past studies. One exception was the comparisons made by Richter and Roselló-Mora , who suggested that low genome sequence coverage can be sufficient for inferring DNA similarity values comparable to ANI obtained with complete genomes.
Bacterial species have mechanisms for gene exchange (transformation, conjugation and transduction), and genetic recombination is believed to play a prominent role in diversifying species by distributing variation and generating new allele combinations . Horizontal gene transfer is an important source of genomic variation within and between species [12–16], and homologous recombination frequently results in the exchange of small genomic regions between members of the same or closely related species . The estimated rates of homologous recombination vary widely among bacteria; in some instances, recombination seems to have contributed to species diversification to a greater extent than even point mutations, whereas in other species homologous recombination appears to be rare .
Recombination has typically been assessed by molecular techniques such as Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis (MLEE), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP), or Multi Locus Sequence Typing MLST [19–21]. These methods primarily measure linkage disequilibrium (LD), and are based on the degree of allele association at different housekeeping loci. For example, E. coli strains show strong LD, reflecting infrequent genetic mixing within local populations . More recently, the availability of complete genomic sequences has allowed recombination to be assessed more accurately . Interestingly, genomic sequencing combined with analyses of population genetics have shown that the recombination rates within E. coli are higher than the mutation rates, but not to the extent that the phylogenetic signal is distorted . Despite frequent recombination between strains, therefore, the genes seem to coexist in an organized genome, resulting in a chromosomal plasticity that accelerates the adaptation of E. coli to various environments.
In this work, we studied the intraspecific variability and recombination in Rhizobium etli, a soil bacterium that associates with bean roots to fix nitrogen. Previous studies have noted that this species has a variable gene content and high genomic divergence , as well as a low rate of recombination (in housekeeping genes) among isolates from the same geographical site [22, 25, 26]. However, in isolates (from the same geographical site) of Sinorhizobium medicae, it was found that frequency of recombination was higher in plasmids and megaplasmids, as compared to the chromosome . The first purpose of this work was to perform a detailed genomic analysis of the nucleotide variation in this species. Accordingly, we used stringent methods to identify SNPs from a set of complete and draft genomes of R. etli, assessed the value of draft genomes and low coverage data when seeking to obtain global measures of genetic relatedness, and then examined the nucleotide differences among various strains of R. etli. The second purpose was to assess the role of recombination in generating genomic diversity in R. etli. Our results confirm and extend the previous estimations on the genomic diversity of R. etli, and indicate that recombination might play only a minor role in generating such diversity. Therefore, we conclude that the species R. etli is composed of separate genomic lineages that share a low rate of recombination but have a common symbiotic phenotype.
Nucleotide variation assessment in complete and draft genomes
Since accurate SNP identification relies largely on the quality of the sequence data, the use of draft genome sequences could potentially introduce errors into the variation estimates. Therefore, stringent parameters (see Methods) were used to identify high-quality SNPs in a set of two complete R. etli genomes, CFN42 and CIAT652, isolated from México and Costa Rica respectively, and six draft genome sequences from strains isolated in different places of the world: BRASIL5 (Brazil), CIAT894 (Colombia), GR56, IE4771 (México), KIM5 (USA), and 8C-3 and GR56 (Spain) . All the Sanger reads were collected from the draft genomes (about 13,000 reads of 1000 nucleotides in length per genome on average) were aligned against the predicted ORFs of the CFN42 or CIAT652 genomes, and the alignments were evaluated using Polybayes (additional file 1 Figure S1), which determined the probability that a nucleotide site was polymorphic, based on the Phred quality of the read. A Phred value of Q20 and a probability greater than 0.90 are generally considered acceptable for the detection of SNPs . Most of the SNPs in our data set had probability scores > 0.975, indicating that more than 100,000 SNPs per genome had Phred qualities over Q45 (additional file 1 Figure S1). To avoid the possible inclusion of false positives (in average 27,000 SNPs by each strain), we used only SNPs with a minimum Phred score of Q45 and the highest Bayesian probabilities (> 0.99) throughout this work .
Additional errors in SNP determination might arise from poorly aligned regions. Since R. etli genomes have a high proportion of paralogous sequences [24, 30], a stringent identification of orthologous segments of genes was performed. We aligned the contigs of each draft genome sequence against the ORFs from the complete genomes of either CFN42 or CIAT652, using both ungapped and gapped alignments, along with the reciprocal best hit criteria. We considered DNA gene segments as being orthologous to the reference sequence if they had nucleotide identities higher than 85% and coverage higher than 60% of the reference gene. Various numbers of orthologous segments were identified from the draft genomes, covering about 40% of the total gene contents of the reference strains. The total amount of data collected by this procedure is about 2 to 2.5 Mb per draft genome (additional file 1 Table S1).
SNP frequencies among the R. etlistrains
Average nucleotide variation
Nucleotide variation profiles in homologous genomic segments from different R. etlistrains
Extent of recombination
To explore whether the recombination is particularly acting on some classes of genes, we assigned the recombinant segments to COGs (see Methods), as shown additional file 1 Figure S3. All the functional classes annotated in the CFN42 genome are present in the draft genomes but they are represented unevenly in the recombinant segments. For instance, the categories: amino acid transport and metabolism, carbohydrate transport and metabolism, energy production and conversion, lipid transport and metabolism, general function prediction only and function unknown appear overrepresented among the recombinant segments. In counterpart, some other categories like transcription and signal transduction mechanisms are in lower frequency among the recombinant segments than in CFN42. Even though we performed a chi-square and Range tests  to assess the significance of these differences, the incomplete nature of draft genomes does not allow to conclude about some bias toward recombination in certain classes of genes.
In the present work, we used a genomic approach to detect and measure variation in the form of SNPs, and to analyze the contribution of recombination to the genomic diversification of R. etli strains. Our results demonstrated that draft genomic sequences samples representing ~1× of the genome can be used to measure variation at the whole-genome level in this species. In R. etli we found a great amount of variation (more than 161,998 SNPs) when any draft genome was compared to the complete genomes of CFN42 and CIAT652. To assess the reliability of this method for identifying SNPs, we quantified the SNPs in E. coli genomes at 1× and in complete genomes assembled at about 10× coverage. We found the same variation level using either draft or complete E. coli genomes, indicating that draft genomes produced estimations of DNA variability comparable to those generated using complete genomes even at only 1× coverage. Richter and Roselló-Mora  previously reported on the use of partial sequences representing about 20% of the genomes of several bacterial species to infer reliable values of DNA divergence between strains. The authors of the prior paper showed that ANI values obtained with these samples correlated well with the DDH values, indicating that draft genome sequences are an acceptable data source. At present, the rapid improvement of DNA sequencing technology is allowing researchers to use multiplex sequencing to simultaneously process an increasing number of genomic sequences. These experiments will produce additional draft genome sequences of different qualities, and the approach proposed herein should prove useful for their early analysis.
We identified a higher proportion of SNPs in R. etli strains than in E. coli strains, and the differences between the various R. etli strains and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv viciae 3841 ranged from 7% to 11% (median; additional file 1 Figure S2), with the latter figure corresponding to the CFN42 comparison. R. etli and R. leguminosarum are different species according to 16S comparison; however, they share a common genomic core and are distinguished by variable accessory components (e.g., plasmids) [24, 36, 37]. Therefore, an ANV range of 7-11% might be a good indicator of speciation within Rhizobium. Despite of the variability in ANV among the tested strains of R. etli (about 4-6%), none had ANV values comparable to those obtained with respect to R. leguminosarum. The levels of ANV were higher for comparisons using CFN42 than those done with CIAT652. For taxonomic purposes, CFN42 is the type strain of R. etli . In the present analysis, however, we found that CFN42 was the most differentiated of the studied samples, had the highest proportion of unique SNPs, and clustered as a divergent independent branch when the strain phylogeny was explored. We recently re-sequenced strain CFN42 using Solexa-Illumina technology and compared it with the former complete genome sequence. Very few indels and SNPs (less than 20 SNPs) and no rearrangements were found. Therefore, very small variation can be expected from an in vitro lifestyle. In contrast, most of the strains analyzed were more closely related to CIAT652 than to CFN42. A prior study noted that CIAT652 and CFN42 have a low ANI value (90.44%)  and suggested that CIAT652 is improperly classified as R. etli. We previously showed that CFN42 and CIAT652 share a very conserved symbiotic plasmid, but have high divergence throughout the rest of their genomes . Given that all isolates of R. etli have been recovered from nitrogen-fixing bean nodules, this characteristic would be expected to dominate the classification criteria. The genomic divergence described herein is thus consistent with a model in which the species R. etli is composed of divergent genomic lineages that share the symbiotic phenotype conferred by the symbiotic plasmid , which is called a common symbiovar . Indeed, our analysis suggests that in some instances, the use of type strains could lead to misleading taxonomic classifications, especially when gene transfer mechanisms are active. R. etli is known to have mobile elements such as conjugative plasmids, insertion sequences and bacteriophages [40–42]. Therefore, gene flow and recombination among strains of R. etli might be important to the production of genomic diversity, as reflected in its pangenomic structure . However, no prior study has assessed the role of homologous recombination in promoting the genomic diversity of R. etli. Earlier works using MLEE or MLST concluded that R. etli populations are essentially clonal, with low recombination even in sympatric populations [22, 25, 26, 43]. More recently, Flores et al.  showed that despite the high conservation of the symbiotic plasmid pSym sequences from a collection of different strains of R. etli, some regions shared identical SNP distribution profiles. This observation was interpreted as evidence of homologous recombination. Here, we obtained similar findings for a set of common genomic DNA segments, mainly chromosomal in origin, belonging to eight strains of R. etli. Quantification of probable recombination events and the extrapolation of our findings to the whole genome suggested that a minimum of 260 recombination events had occurred in the genome of each strain. Strains CFN42 and CIAT894 were the more variable in terms of SNPs, and the latter also showed the most evidence for recombinant events in our quartet analysis (within the orthologous segments). Even though there were some discrepancies within the clades of the various phylogenetic trees we generated, most of the trees were congruent with the consensus tree. Moreover, although the estimated recombination was correlated with genetic diversity (Figure 7a), it was low overall (3-10%). In comparison, the whole-genome recombination estimates reported for Rickettsia and Streptococcus were on the order of 18-37% and 28%, respectively [45, 46]. These data suggest that only a minor fraction of the R. etli genome has undergone recombination, which thus accounts for only a low proportion of the polymorphism in this species.
In bacteria, the frequency of RecA-mediated homologous recombination depends on the level DNA identity, and small DNA fragments are often introduced into the cell via conjugation, transformation or transduction. Consequently, only a fraction of the genome might be targeted by recombination . Several other factors might account for the low recombination frequency detected in the isolate of R. etli studied here. Among them, the ample degree of divergence among the studied R. etli strains, their distant geographical origins (USA, México, Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil, and Spain) , and the small number of sampled strains. Recently, Bailly et al., reported a population genomics analysis of sympatric strains of Sinorhizobium medicae . They found very low levels of polymorphism and recombination in the chromosome in comparison with the megaplasmids. Future studies using our methodology on R. etli isolates from single sites could be used to improve our understanding of how recombination impacts the diversification of this species.
In summary, our results and the previous reports on R. etli support a model in which the species is composed of evolutionarily independent lineages that share a symbiotic phenotype but have low levels of recombination among the various lineages. However, although genetic barriers imposed by divergence or other barriers such as geographical distance might preclude homologous recombination among the strains, gene flow (e.g., by plasmids and chromosomal islands) is an ongoing process that shapes the genomic and pangenomic structures of R. etli.
Complete genome sequences were downloaded from GenBank as follows: for R. etli CFN42: chromosome [GenBank:NC_007761], and plasmids pCFN42a [GenBank:NC_007762], pCFN42b [GenBank:NC_007763], pCFN4c [GenBank:NC_007764], pCFN42d [GenBank:NC_004041], pCFN42e [GenBank:NC_007765], and pCFN42f [GenBank:NC_007766]; for R. etli CIAT652: chromosome [GenBank:NC010994], and plasmids pCIAT652a [GenBank:NC010998], pCIAT652b [GenBank:NC010996], and pCIAT652c [GenBank:NC010994]; and for R. leguminosarum 3841: chromosome [GenBank:NC_008380], and plasmids pRL7 [GenBank:NC_008382], pRL8 [GenBank:NC_008383], pRL9 [GenBank:NC_008379], pRL10 [GenBank:NC_008381], pRL11 [GenBank:NC_008384], and pRL12 [GenBank:NC_008378]. We also used reads and contigs from the draft genomes of R. etli strains 8C-3 [GenBank:NZ_ABRA00000000], BRASIL5 [GenBank:NZ_ABQZ00000000], CIAT894 [GenBank:NZ_ABRD0000000], GR56 [GenBank:NZ_AABRD0000000], IE4771 [GenBank:NZ_ABRD00000000], and KIM5 [GenBank:NZ_ABQY0000000].
Determination of SNPs and pairwise nucleotide differences
Paired alignments between the draft genomes (contigs) and the ORFs from the genomes of CFN42 or CIAT652 were performed using the Dds2 program , which produces ungapped alignments of fragments having similarities greater than 80%. Each duplicated paired alignment (i.e., segments for which paralogous existed in the reference genome) was filtered using the reciprocal best hits option of the Fil program  under the following parameter set: coverage > 60% with respect to a reference gene and a percentage differential score cutoff < 10%. When two alignments had the same coverage, we selected the alignment with the higher score. Once the results were filtered, we created a gapped alignment using the Gap22 program  on segments for which the identity was greater than 85%. Both sequences were extracted using an ad hoc Perl script (homemade) formed for each paired alignment. To avoid frameshifts, we realigned each pair using cross-match  with the following parameters: discrep_lists masklevel, 0; tags gap_init, 3; gap_ext, 2; ins_gap_ext, 2; del_gap_ext, 2; minmatch, 14; maxmatch, 14; max_group_size, 20; minscore, 30; bandwidth, 14; and indexwordsize, 10. Finally, for each alignment, we determined the probability that a site was polymorphic using the Polybayes program , with the probability set at greater than 0.99 and a minimum Phred of Q45 [51, 52].
Assessment of methodological accuracy at low coverage
To determine if differences in coverage among the studied strains affected the reliability of the variability estimations, we took readings representing ~1× sequence coverages of seven E. coli genomes and complete-genome readings (about 10×) of the same genomes from GenBank (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/) and assembled these readings using the Celera assembler . The above-described analysis was applied to both the 1× and 10× coverage datasets, and the results were compared using the Mann-Whitney and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests . The utilized E. coli draft genomes were: 101-1 [GenBank:NZ_AAMK00000000], 53638 [GenBank:NZ_AAKB00000000], B171 [GenBank:NZ_AAJX0000000], E1100019 [GenBank:NZ_AAJW0000000], F11 [GenBank:NZ_AAJU0000000], HS [GenBank:NC_009800], and O157_H7_ec4024 [GenBank:NZ_ABJT0000000]. The complete genome sequence of E. coli K12 [GenBank:NC_000913] was used as the reference.
Determination of triplets (homologous segments)
For the comparisons between all ORFs of the reference genomes (both CFN42 and CIAT652 were used throughout the work) and each incomplete genome (the contigs), we obtained the coordinates of all homologous segments (triplets) using the Mauve program . Our analysis was standardized by aligning p42F (CFN42) against (R. leguminosarum bv viciae 3841) pRL12 using the following parameters: backbone-size = 100; max-backbone-gap = 50; weight = 90; island-size = 100. These plasmids were chosen because they contain shared syntenic blocks . Sequence extraction, realignment of each conserved segment (backbone) and SNP determination were all performed as described above (see determination of SNPs section).
Determination of quartets (orthologous segments)
To detect recombination events among DNA sequences, at least four sequences are required for the analysis . Here, we first identified SNPs that distinguished each draft genome from the two reference genomes (CFN42 and CIAT652), and then determined the fragments that were shared between each draft genome and the ORFs from CFN42 and CIAT652, together with all replicons of R. leguminosarum 3841 (chosen because of its extensive synteny with CFN42) . Sharing was determined using the Mauve program  (see determination of triplets section) and the shared fragments were realigned with the Muscle program (default parameters) . To eliminate any large gaps within the alignments (rare in orthologous fragments), we used the Gblocks program under its default parameters .
Detection of recombination
Geneconv : Using this program, we ran 100,000 simulations for each quartet with the following parameters chosen: Dumptab; Dumpjseq; Dumpfrag; Annotate; WideCol; ShowBlast; Indel_blocs; ShowBcPwKaPvals; SortGfragsBySeq; Show_maxmeansims; ShowUnal; Gscale = 1; ListPair; ListBest; Bcsims; Allouter; Numsim = 100000/sp. This allowed us to detect possible genetic conversion events.
Pist : With this program, we first identified the best-fit DNA substitution model for each shared fragment using the Akaike information criterion. We then used the best model to reconstruct the phylogeny using a maximum likelihood method (Phyml ) with 100 non-parametric bootstrap replicates. We next determined the invariant sites, alpha values, ts/tv ratios, base frequencies, and constant sites using the PAML program  and the GTR model. Finally, we ran Pist with the REV model and 10,000 permutations. Pist uses parsimony-informative sites to detect recombination events and is robust for highly divergent genes.
PhiPack : We used the parameters of 10,000 permutations and a window size of 25 nt, and implemented the Pairwise Homoplasy Index, Maximum X2, and the Neighbor Similarity Score.
Hyphy program : We used the routine GARD, which enables automated phylogenetic detection of recombination. We employed the GTR model and beta-gamma rate variation.
To determine if a recombinant gene was present in two different quartets or strains, we constructed a binary presence/absence matrix (1/0) for each gene that was found in two or more strains. These profiles were hierarchically clustered using the Cluster program .
Regions shared among all strains of R. etli and R. leguminosarum bv viciae 3841 were identified using the Mauve program , realigned by Muscle using the default parameters , and filtered for long gaps with Gblocks . We then obtained the phylogeny of each region using a maximum likelihood approach employed by the Phyml program  (with 1,000 non-parametric bootstrap replicates) and the best nucleotide substitution model identified by the Akaike information criterion [67, 68]. We used three methods to construct the phylogeny from the concatenated dataset, in order to determine the species tree. The first was the RAxML program (maximum likelihood) , in which we ran the GTR nucleotide substitution model and a GAMMA+P-Invar estimation of rate heterogeneity. This analysis yielded a Maximum Likelihood ML estimate of the alpha parameter and 1,000 distinct randomized Maximum Parsimony trees. The second program used was Phyml (maximum likelihood) , running 1,000 non-parametric replicates and the GTRG model. Finally, we employed the MrBayes program (Bayesian analysis)  running the Nucmodel 4by4 for DNA. The number of rate categories for the gamma distribution was set at four, with an allowance for a proportion of invariable sites. Because of the high computational burden, we performed two runs with four chains, for 500,000 generations in total. Trees were sampled every 500 generations, 25% of all samples were removed as reflecting burn-ins, and a consensus was obtained. Moreover, to assess differences in topology among the probable strain trees and individual gene trees, we used the Consel program , which calculated expected likelihood weighting and performed the Shimodaira-Hasegawa SH test . Finally, a neighbor-net network was generated using the concatenated sequences and the Splits tree4 program .
Nucleotide diversity and ts/tv ratios
For each shared fragment (quartet), we determined the nucleotide diversity and segregating sites using R. leguminosarum 3841 as an outgroup and employing the libsequence library . The transition/transversion ts/tv ratios were determined for each quartet by using the PAML program  and applying the best model of nucleotide substitution obtained from each orthologous segment (see determination of quartet).
We used the COGs database  to undertake functional annotation across the four broad categories and sub categories to shared regions (all strains) as well as recombinant quartets. Quartets that had not been functionally assigned within the COG database were placed in the "Poorly Characterized'' category. For assignation to a category, we used the reciprocal best hits technique with an E-value < 1 × 10-7.
We thank José Espiritu, Ismael L Hernández, and José L Fernández for their help with technical and computational resources, and Miguel A Cevallos for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from CONACyT (CB131499 and U4633) and PAPIIT-UNAM (IN215908 and IN223005). JLA received a Ph. D. fellowship from CONACyT. We thank the Doctorate in Biomedical Sciences and specially to National Autonomous University of México.
LEE contributed during a sabbatical visit to the University of California Irvine (UCI) in the laboratory of Brandon Gaut; this work was supported by UC-MEXUS, CONACYT, and DGAPA, UNAM.
- Kimura M, Takahata N: Selective constraint in protein polymorphism: study of the effectively neutral mutation model by using an improved pseudosampling method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983, 80 (4): 1048-1052. 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1048.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nei M: Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22 (12): 2318-2342. 10.1093/molbev/msi242.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wagner A: Neutralism and selectionism: a network-based reconciliation. Nat Rev Genet. 2008, 9 (12): 965-974.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konstantinidis KT, Ramette A, Tiedje JM: The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006, 361 (1475): 1929-1940. 10.1098/rstb.2006.1920.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rossello-Mora R, Amann R: The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001, 25 (1): 39-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, Krichevsky MI, Moore WEC, Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E, Starr MP, et al: Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987, 37: 463-464. 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Konstantinidis KT, Ramette A, Tiedje JM: The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006, 361 (1475): 1929-1940. 10.1098/rstb.2006.1920.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (18): 6258-6264. 10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Deloger M, El Karoui M, Petit MA: A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191 (1): 91-99. 10.1128/JB.01202-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Richter M, Rossello-Mora R: Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (45): 19126-19131. 10.1073/pnas.0906412106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Didelot X, Maiden MC: Impact of recombination on bacterial evolution. Trends Microbiol. 18 (7): 315-322.Google Scholar
- Bergstrom CT, Lipsitch M, Levin BR: Natural selection, infectious transfer and the existence conditions for bacterial plasmids. Genetics. 2000, 155 (4): 1505-1519.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Campbell AM: Lateral gene transfer in prokaryotes. Theor Popul Biol. 2000, 57 (2): 71-77. 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gal-Mor O, Finlay BB: Pathogenicity islands: a molecular toolbox for bacterial virulence. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8 (11): 1707-1719. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00794.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA: The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J Mol Evol. 2002, 54 (3): 396-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas CM, Nielsen KM: Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3 (9): 711-721. 10.1038/nrmicro1234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Touzain F, Denamur E, Medigue C, Barbe V, El Karoui M, Petit MA: Small variable segments constitute a major type of diversity of bacterial genomes at the species level. Genome Biol. 2010, 11 (4): R45-10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-r45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Spratt BG, Hanage WP, Feil EJ: The relative contributions of recombination and point mutation to the diversification of bacterial clones. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001, 4 (5): 602-606. 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00257-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiggins FM: The rate of recombination in Wolbachia bacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19 (9): 1640-1643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jolley KA, Wilson DJ, Kriz P, McVean G, Maiden MC: The influence of mutation, recombination, population history, and selection on patterns of genetic diversity in Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22 (3): 562-569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tettelin H, Riley D, Cattuto C, Medini D: Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008, 11 (5): 472-477. 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Souza V, Nguyen TT, Hudson RR, Pinero D, Lenski RE: Hierarchical analysis of linkage disequilibrium in Rhizobium populations: evidence for sex?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (17): 8389-8393. 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8389.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abby S, Daubin V: Comparative genomics and the evolution of prokaryotes. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15 (3): 135-141. 10.1016/j.tim.2007.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez V, Acosta JL, Santamaria RI, Bustos P, Fernandez JL, Hernandez Gonzalez IL, Diaz R, Flores M, Palacios R, Mora J, et al: Conserved symbiotic plasmid DNA sequences in the multireplicon pangenomic structure of Rhizobium etli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76 (5): 1604-1614. 10.1128/AEM.02039-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pinero D, Martinez E, Selander RK: Genetic diversity and relationships among isolates of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988, 54 (11): 2825-2832.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Silva C, Le E, Souza V: Reticulated and epidemic population genetic structure of Rhizobium etli biovar phaseoli in a traditionally managed locality in Mexico. Molecular Ecology. 1999, 8: 277-287. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00564.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bailly X, Giuntini E, Sexton MC, Lower RP, Harrison PW, Kumar N, Young JP: Population genomics of Sinorhizobium medicae based on low-coverage sequencing of sympatric isolates. ISME J. 2011Google Scholar
- Brockman W, Alvarez P, Young S, Garber M, Giannoukos G, Lee WL, Russ C, Lander ES, Nusbaum C, Jaffe DB: Quality scores and SNP detection in sequencing-by-synthesis systems. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (5): 763-770. 10.1101/gr.070227.107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hubisz MJ, Lin MF, Kellis M, Siepel A: Error and error mitigation in low-coverage genome assemblies. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (2): e17034-10.1371/journal.pone.0017034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez V, Bustos P, Ramirez-Romero MA, Medrano-Soto A, Salgado H, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Hernandez-Celis JC, Quintero V, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Girard L, et al: The mosaic structure of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium etli CFN42 and its relation to other symbiotic genome compartments. Genome Biol. 2003, 4 (6): R36-10.1186/gb-2003-4-6-r36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Huson DH, Bryant D: Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23 (2): 254-267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraser C, Hanage WP, Spratt BG: Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science. 2007, 315 (5811): 476-480. 10.1126/science.1127573.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dean CB, Nielsen JD: Generalized linear mixed models: a review and some extensions. Lifetime Data Anal. 2007, 13 (4): 497-512. 10.1007/s10985-007-9065-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller I, Bensasson D, Nichols RA: Transition-transversion bias is not universal: a counter example from grasshopper pseudogenes. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (2): e22-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030022.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yang Z, Bielawski JP: Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000, 15 (12): 496-503. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01994-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crossman LC, Castillo-Ramirez S, McAnnula C, Lozano L, Vernikos GS, Acosta JL, Ghazoui ZF, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Meakin G, Walker AW, et al: A common genomic framework for a diverse assembly of plasmids in the symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacteria. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (7): e2567-10.1371/journal.pone.0002567.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Young JP, Crossman LC, Johnston AW, Thomson NR, Ghazoui ZF, Hull KH, Wexler M, Curson AR, Todd JD, Poole PS, et al: The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components. Genome Biol. 2006, 7 (4): R34-10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-r34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Segovia L, Pinero D, Palacios R, Martinez-Romero E: Genetic structure of a soil population of nonsymbiotic Rhizobium leguminosarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991, 57 (2): 426-433.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rogel MA, Ormeno-Orrillo E, Martinez Romero E: Symbiovars in rhizobia reflect bacterial adaptation to legumes. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2011, 34 (2): 96-104. 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.11.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tun-Garrido C, Bustos P, Gonzalez V, Brom S: Conjugative transfer of p42a from rhizobium etli CFN42, which is required for mobilization of the symbiotic plasmid, is regulated by quorum sensing. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (5): 1681-1692. 10.1128/JB.185.5.1681-1692.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lozano L, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Bustos P, Santamaria RI, Souza V, Young JP, Davila G, Gonzalez V: Evolutionary dynamics of insertion sequences in relation to the evolutionary histories of the chromosome and symbiotic plasmid genes of Rhizobium etli populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76 (19): 6504-6513. 10.1128/AEM.01001-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Mendoza D, Dominguez-Ferreras A, Munoz S, Soto MJ, Olivares J, Brom S, Girard L, Herrera-Cervera JA, Sanjuan J: Identification of functional mob regions in Rhizobium etli: evidence for self-transmissibility of the symbiotic plasmid pRetCFN42d. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (17): 5753-5761. 10.1128/JB.186.17.5753-5761.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Silva C, Vinuesa P, Eguiarte LE, Martinez-Romero E, Souza V: Rhizobium etli and Rhizobium gallicum nodulate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in a traditionally managed milpa plot in Mexico: population genetics and biogeographic implications. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69 (2): 884-893. 10.1128/AEM.69.2.884-893.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Flores M, Morales L, Avila A, Gonzalez V, Bustos P, Garcia D, Mora Y, Guo X, Collado-Vides J, Pinero D, et al: Diversification of DNA sequences in the symbiotic genome of Rhizobium etli. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (21): 7185-7192. 10.1128/JB.187.21.7185-7192.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lefebure T, Stanhope MJ: Evolution of the core and pan-genome of Streptococcus: positive selection, recombination, and genome composition. Genome Biol. 2007, 8 (5): R71-10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Yu T, Bao Q, Zhao F: Evidence of extensive homologous recombination in the core genome of rickettsia. Comp Funct Genomics. 2009, 510270-Google Scholar
- Retchless AC, Lawrence JG: Phylogenetic incongruence arising from fragmented speciation in enteric bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (25): 11453-11458. 10.1073/pnas.1001291107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Huang X: A method for finding single-nucleotide polymorphisms with allele frequencies in sequences of deep coverage. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 220-10.1186/1471-2105-6-220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gordon D, Desmarais C, Green P: Automated finishing with autofinish. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (4): 614-625. 10.1101/gr.171401.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Marth GT, Korf I, Yandell MD, Yeh RT, Gu Z, Zakeri H, Stitziel NO, Hillier L, Kwok PY, Gish WR: A general approach to single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery. Nat Genet. 1999, 23 (4): 452-456. 10.1038/70570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ewing B, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 186-194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence CB, Solovyev VV: Assignment of position-specific error probability to primary DNA sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22 (7): 1272-1280. 10.1093/nar/22.7.1272.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides PG, Scherer SE, Li PW, Hoskins RA, Galle RF, et al: The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000, 287 (5461): 2185-2195. 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT: Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (7): 1394-1403. 10.1101/gr.2289704.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA: The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J Mol Evol. 2002, 54 (3): 396-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 113-10.1186/1471-2105-5-113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Talavera G, Castresana J: Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007, 56 (4): 564-577. 10.1080/10635150701472164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posada D: Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: empirical data. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19 (5): 708-717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA, Holmes EC: Recombination in evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2002, 36: 75-97. 10.1146/annurev.genet.36.040202.111115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer S: Statistical tests for detecting gene conversion. Mol Biol Evol. 1989, 6 (5): 526-538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Worobey M: A novel approach to detecting and measuring recombination: new insights into evolution in viruses, bacteria, and mitochondria. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18 (8): 1425-1434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52 (5): 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang Z: PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1586-1591. 10.1093/molbev/msm088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruen TC, Philippe H, Bryant D: A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics. 2006, 172 (4): 2665-2681.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kosakovsky Pond SL, Posada D, Gravenor MB, Woelk CH, Frost SD: GARD: a genetic algorithm for recombination detection. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (24): 3096-3098. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (25): 14863-14868. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA: Selecting models of nucleotide substitution: an application to human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18 (6): 897-906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA: Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst Biol. 2001, 50 (4): 580-601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H: RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (4): 456-463. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19 (12): 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M: CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17 (12): 1246-1247. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strimmer K, Rambaut A: Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc Biol Sci. 2002, 269 (1487): 137-142. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1862.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thornton K: Libsequence: a C++ class library for evolutionary genetic analysis. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19 (17): 2325-2327. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV: The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1): 33-36. 10.1093/nar/28.1.33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.