Diversification of CYCLOIDEA-like genes in Dipsacaceae (Dipsacales): implications for the evolution of capitulum inflorescences
© Carlson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 16 August 2011
- Accepted: 6 November 2011
- Published: 6 November 2011
CYCLOIDEA (CYC)-like genes have been implicated in the development of capitulum inflorescences (i.e. flowering heads) in Asteraceae, where many small flowers (florets) are packed tightly into an inflorescence that resembles a single flower. Several rounds of duplication of CYC-like genes have occurred in Asteraceae, and this is hypothesized to be correlated with the evolution of the capitulum, which in turn has been implicated in the evolutionary success of the group. We investigated the evolution of CYC-like genes in Dipsacaceae (Dipsacales), a plant clade in which capitulum inflorescences originated independently of Asteraceae. Two main inflorescence types are present in Dipsacaceae: (1) radiate species contain two kinds of floret within the flowering head (disk and ray), and (2) discoid species contain only disk florets. To test whether a dynamic pattern of gene duplication, similar to that documented in Asteraceae, is present in Dipsacaceae, and whether these patterns are correlated with different inflorescence types, we inferred a CYC-like gene phylogeny for Dipsacaceae based on representative species from the major lineages.
We recovered within Dipsacaceae the three major forms of CYC-like genes that have been found in most core eudicots, and identified several additional duplications within each of these clades. We found that the number of CYC-like genes in Dipsacaceae is similar to that reported for members of Asteraceae and that the same gene lineages (CYC1-like and CYC2B-like genes) have duplicated in a similar fashion independently in both groups. The number of CYC-like genes recovered for radiate versus discoid species differed, with discoid species having fewer copies of CYC1-like and CYC2B-like genes.
CYC-like genes have undergone extensive duplication in Dipsacaceae, with radiate species having more copies than discoid species, suggesting a potential role for these genes in the evolution of disk and ray florets. The similarity in CYC-like gene diversification seen in Dipsacaceae and some members of the Asteraceae sets the stage to investigate whether the convergent evolution of capitulum inflorescences in both groups may have been underlain by convergent evolution in the same gene family.
- Gene Duplication
- Disk Floret
- Putative Copy
- Core Eudicots
- Inflorescence Type
Gene duplication is an important evolutionary force, providing the raw material for new genes that, if not lost, may be co-opted to perform novel functions [1, 2]. Gene duplication has been implicated in the evolution of transcription factors that play key roles in developmental pathways and are likely involved in morphological evolution [3, 4]. In plants, for example, the MADS-box and TCP gene families underwent duplication deep within angiosperm phylogeny, and these duplication events are thought to have played a role in major changes to flower morphology [5–12]. TCP genes are less well studied than MADS-box genes, but they are increasingly appreciated for their role in generating diverse floral forms.
The TCP gene family is named for the conserved helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TCP domain from TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 (TB1) in Zea mays, CYCLOIDEA (CYC) in Antirrhinum majus, and the proliferating cell factor (PCF) DNA-binding proteins in Oryza sativa. In Arabidopsis, the TCP gene family has 24 copies , which are divided into a clade of PCF genes, which control cell growth, and a clade of CYC/TB1 genes. These two clades differ in the length and sequence of the TCP domain, and some members of the CYC/TB1 clade have an additional conserved arginine rich "R domain" . Within CYC/TB1 the "ECE" clade  contains a group of genes with a conserved short motif (glutamic acid-cysteine-glutamic acid) between the TCP and R domains. There are three major clades of ECE genes in the core eudicots, and the duplications leading to these copies predate this major lineage . We refer to members of the ECE clade as "CYC-like" genes. The best studied of these genes, CYC itself, is required for the production of bilaterally symmetrical (zygomorphic, monosymmetric) flowers as a function of its expression in the dorsal portion of the floral meristem [16–18].
While CYC-like genes have been primarily studied in the context of floral symmetry in single flowers, they have also been implicated in the development of the capitulum (or "head") inflorescence in Asteraceae, a trait that may be associated with the evolutionary success of this group [19, 20]. A typical capitulum consists of many small flowers (florets) packed tightly into a condensed head that can closely resemble a single large flower. In some groups, the florets in different parts of the capitulum are morphologically distinct. In radiate species, the outer florets (rays) are bilaterally symmetrical while the inner florets (disks) are radially symmetrical (actinomorphic, polysymmetric). In discoid species, there is little or no variation in floret morphology and the capitulum is composed of disk florets only. A third inflorescence type in Asteraceae, characteristic of the Lactuceae, consists of a capitulum with entirely bilaterally symmetrical flowers (ligulate florets). In Asteraceae, the evolution of CYC-like genes has been studied thoroughly in the radiate species Helianthus annuus (the cultivated sunflower), where ten copies have been recovered, which is more that in any other species to date . Such extensive gene duplication is thought to be correlated with the evolution of ray versus disk florets [20, 21]; however, this possible connection has not been investigated in any groups outside of the Asteraceae, nor has copy number been compared in clades with different inflorescence types.
The aim of this study is to investigate patterns of gene duplication in CYC-like genes and relate patterns of gene evolution to the evolution of radiate versus discoid inflorescences. We also seek to compare the diversification of CYC-like genes in Dipsacaceae to that reported for members of Asteraceae (e.g. Helianthus), to test for a similar pattern of gene duplication. This study represents a first step in eventually deciphering the involvement of CYC-like genes in determining capitulum form and differences in floral symmetry in Dipsacaceae.
We recovered between 2 and 12 copies for each species. While we extensively screened 14 representatives of the major lineages of Dipsacaceae, we did not recover all hypothesized copies from each species, which may have been the result of unsuccessful amplification or absence/loss from those genomes. Our analysis recovered the three main clades of CYC-like genes that have been reported for core eudicots and the additional duplications previously found in representatives of Dipsacaceae (i.e. DipsCYC1, DipsCYC2Ba, DipsCYC2Bb, and DipsCYC3B) . We name the three major clades of Dipsacaceae CYC-like genes: DpcCYC1, DpcCYC2, and DpcCYC3. Also consistent with previous results is the sister relationship of DpcCYC2 and DpcCYC3. Novel findings include copies DpcCYC2A and DpcCYC3A, whose orthologs had been inferred for other members of the Dipsacales , and additional duplications within DpcCYC1 (Figure 3) and within DpcCYC2Ba and DpcCYC2Bb (Figure 4), which are unique to Dipsacaceae. The additional duplications within these clades are found only in species with radiate capitula.
DpcCYC1 is well supported, with the sequence from B. bretschneideri resolved as sister to two clades of DpcCYC1 in the separate analysis (DpcCYC1A and DpcCYC1B; Figure 3). That is, the duplication within DpcCYC1 appears to have occurred after the core Dipsacaceae split from Bassecoia. DpcCYC1A is recovered only from members of the Dipknautid clade, including both discoid (i.e. D. pilosus) and radiate (i.e. C. hirsuta, K. calycina) species, while DpcCYC1B is found only in radiate species from Scabioseae and the Dipknautids. Within DpcCYC1B, there are four clades ("1B1-1B4") representing four putative copies (although Bayesian support for 1B4 was low: ML bootstrap = 78, posterior probability = 0.76).
The DpcCYC2 clade is the largest and most complicated group in terms of duplication events and this clade aligns with five copies of Helianthus, which has undergone a similar radiation in this gene lineage. We found evidence for one copy of DpcCYC2A in all major lineages of Dipsacaceae, and within this clade, the gene phylogeny is generally consistent with the species phylogeny . With the separate analysis of DpcCYC2B, we were able to further clarify relationships within this gene lineage (Figure 4). The two major copies that were previously reported  - DpcCYC2Ba and DpcCYC2Bb - are hereafter referred to as "2Ba" and "2Bb" for simplicity. In the combined analysis of all CYC-like genes, the DpcCYC2Ba sequence from B. bretschneideri is sister to sequences from all remaining species in this clade, similar to the placement of the sequences from B. bretschneideri in DpcCYC1. In the separate analysis of DpcCYC2Ba, however, the position of the sequence from B. bretschneideri is unresolved but joins sequences from the other discoid species Pseudoscabiosa limonifolia, Dipsacus pilosus, and Dipsacus inermis outside a large clade composed only of sequences from radiate species from both the Scabioseae and Dipknautid groups. We inferred five putative copies within this core clade of 2Ba (2Ba1 - 2Ba5; Figure 4). Similarly, within the 2Bb lineage, we found only one copy in the discoid species (i.e. B. bretschneideri, P. limonifolia, D. pilosus). Sequences from these species, along with the Dipknautid radiate species Knautia calycina and Cephalaria hirsuta, are resolved outside of a clade composed of sequences from radiate species from both the Dipknautids and Scabioseae. Within this core clade of 2Bb, we inferred two putative copies (2Bb1, 2Bb2), although support for 2Bb1 was low (i.e. ML bootstrap = 65, posterior probability = 0.57).
Lastly, we recovered the fewest sequences from the DpcCYC3 clade. Within DpcCYC3, we found evidence for one copy of DpcCYC3A for members of Scabioseae, but did not recover this gene for Bassecoia or members of the Dipknautid clade. DpcCYC3B was recovered for four species that represent the three major lineages of Dipsacaceae (Bassecoia; Pseudoscabiosa and Knautia from the Dipknautid clade; Sixalix from Scabioseae) and there were two copies of this gene for K. calycina.
Our study verifies that gene duplication events yielded five major copies of CYC-like genes prior to the origin of Dipsacaceae (DpcCYC1, DpcCYC2A, DpcCYC2B, DpcCYC3A, and DpcCYC3B) . The major duplication found in DpcCYC1 (DpcCYC1A, DpcCYC1B) and the additional putative copies within DpcCYC1B are found in Dipsacaceae but not in other Dipsacales. Similarly, the major duplication in DpcCYC2B (2Ba, 2Bb) is consistent with previous studies , but the additional duplications within these copies are unique to Dipsacaceae. These duplications do not appear to be the result of recent polyploidization events, as they do not occur across all copies. Additionally, chromosome counts indicate that there is no evidence for genome doubling in the species used in this study [27–29] (although, ancient whole genome duplication in the ancestor of Dipsacaceae has not been investigated). We feel that the newly discovered subclades within DpcCYC1 and DpcCYC2B likely represent different copies, as opposed to alleles, because they contain species from throughout the Dipsacaceae phylogeny. In other words, we would not expect allele sequences to be conserved across distant relatives.
Gene trees in relation to the species tree
Congruence between gene trees and the species tree within Dipsacaceae is difficult to interpret. Outgroups in the Linnina clade are generally resolved as sister to Dipsacaceae, although phylogenetic relationships between these species tend to be poorly supported. The two Helianthus CYC1-like copies are resolved outside of the CYC1-like clade, indicating that better phylogenetic sampling is needed to clarify relationships among copies in this part of the tree. Within DpcCYC1, the failure to amplify DpcCYC1A from members of Scabioseae (or the loss of this copy from these genomes), combined with the additional copies in DpcCYC1B, renders species relationships within this clade unclear. The DpcCYC2A tree (with no duplications) is more or less consistent with phylogenetic studies [23, 30, 31], although the position of B. bretschneideri is weakly resolved (i.e. < .90 posterior probability, < 70% ML bootstrap support) with members of the Dipknautids rather than as sister to all other Dipsacaceae, as in the species phylogeny. Within DpcCYC2B, the presence of multiple copies precludes the inference of species relationships. Lastly, congruence between the gene trees and the species tree in both copies of DpcCYC3 cannot be determined due to limited taxon sampling and poor phylogenetic signal in the gene trees (likely the result of short sequence length). Based on these results, the utility of most DpcCYC genes for use in phylogenetic studies would be problematical due to the presence of multiple putative copies, low amplification success for some genes (e.g. the DpcCYC3's), short sequences with a highly conserved TCP domain that yield low phylogenetic signal, and difficulties in aligning the intervening region. A possible exception is DpcCYC2A, which shows some promise in elucidating species relationships. This gene may be enhanced as a phylogenetic marker by using the full-length sequence rather than the shorter region between the TCP and R domain used in this study.
Strikingly, we found no additional duplications in any of the major subclades for Bassecoia bretschneideri. In the separate analysis of DpcCYC1, the main duplication event occurred after Bassecoia split from the core Dipsacaceae. Similarly, we found no evidence for additional duplications in DpcCYC1 in Dipsacus inermis, Dipsacus pilosus, or Pseudoscabiosa limonifolia, the other discoid species included in this study. In the 2Ba and 2Bb clades, both Dipsacus species and P. limonifolia occupy a position along with B. bretschneideri (plus Knautia calycina and Cephalaria hirsuta in 2Bb) outside of the core clades of these lineages that include all radiate species. Given these results and our current understanding of Dipsacaceae phylogeny (Figure 1), it is perhaps most likely that the 2Ba and 2Bb genes duplicated in the lineage leading to the core Dipsacaceae and were subsequently lost twice: once in the lineage leading to Pseudoscabiosa and once in Dipsacus. However, we cannot rule out that by using a degenerate primer approach we failed to amplify these copies in Bassecoia, Pseudoscabiosa, and Dipsacus. In any case, the occurrence of the same general pattern of duplication in three different CYC-like genes (DpcCYC1, DpcCYC2Ba, and DpcCYC2Bb) is potentially of great interest.
Diversification of CYC-like genes and character evolution
The duplications in Helianthus and radiate Dipsacaceae occur within the same gene lineages. Helianthus has two copies of CYC1-like genes and we recovered five putative copies for radiate species of Dipsacaceae. Most notably, there are five copies of Helianthus in the CYC2-like clade, and seven or eight (depending on resolution in 2Bb) copies in radiate species of Dipsacaceae. Lastly, Helianthus has three copies in the CYC3-like clade, while members of Dipsacaceae appear to have at least two (possibly three in Knautia), although copy number was difficult to assess for this gene clade due to problems with amplification. If we assume that most CYC-like genes that are present have been discovered, then it is possible that the independent evolution of radiate capitula in Asteraceae and Dipsacaceae may have been associated with independent duplication events in orthologous CYC-like genes. However, in the absence of expression data for CYC-like genes in Dipsacaceae and broader studies of gene duplication events within Asteraceae, this is clearly speculative. To date, the evolutionary history of CYC-like genes has not been investigated in discoid Asteraceae (or Asteraceae with inflorescences composed of ligulate florets), so it is unknown whether these species also diverged in copy number from their radiate relatives.
The additional duplications in CYC1-like and CYC2B-like genes are of particular interest because, within the core eudicots, they may be specific to Helianthus and Dipsacaceae, at least within the species that have been surveyed thus far (outside of the core eudicots, two copies of CYC1-like genes are found in Papaveraceae, ). In most previous studies, only a single copy of CYC1-like genes has been found [33, 10]. Our finding that only members of the Dipknautid clade have DpcCYC1A is potentially interesting given the differences in floral traits between the main clades of Dipsacaceae. Members of Scabioseae have five petals while the Dipknautids (and Bassecoia) have four, and the epicalyx in Scabioseae is characterized by several structural modifications that are not present in Bassecoia or in the Dipknautids . However, functional information for CYC1-like genes is limited, although putative orthologs in Arabidopsis are thought to be involved in branching architecture . TB1 is similar in sequence to genes in the CYC1-like clade, and is also responsible for differences in branching architecture between cultivated maize and its wild progenitor, teosinte . While there are no functional data for Helianthus, the two copies of CYC1-like genes (HaCYC1a and HaCYC1b) were found to diverge in expression patterns, with HaCYC1a expressed across all tissues except roots, and HaCYC1b expressed only in the petals . Due to potential differences in CYC1-like genes between Scabioseae and the Dipknautid clade and the presence of multiple copies of DpcCYC1B in radiate species, CYC1-like genes are attractive candidates for future study.
Previous studies have generally found more duplications in the CYC2-like genes than in the CYC1-like or CYC3-like genes; however, no more than three copies have been reported outside of Helianthus and Dipsacaceae . The CYC2-like clade includes CYC from Antirrhinum, and its orthologs have been studied in several plant groups, including in members of Asteraceae, where it has been suggested that CYC-like genes might be responsible for differentiating the radially symmetrical disk florets from the bilaterally symmetrical ray florets . In both Gerbera and Senecio, CYC2-like genes are expressed in ray florets and functional data suggest they are involved in differentiating the radially symmetrical disk florets from the bilaterally symmetrical ray florets [19, 20]. While no functional data exist for the Helianthus orthologs of CYC2-like genes, their expression patterns were found to diverge, which may be indicative of sub and/or neofunctionalization  of the duplicated CYC2-like copies. While our correlational study cannot establish causation, the higher number of DpcCYC2B genes in radiate versus discoid Dipsacaceae suggests that they might also play a role in the development of ray florets. Expression studies and functional data are needed to address this possibility.
The results presented here represent the first step in assessing the role of CYC-like genes in Dipsacaceae development. We recovered the five major clades that were reported in previous studies and discovered several additional copies, most notably in the DpcCYC1 and DpcCYC2B clades. The DpcCYC2B clade in particular demonstrates a dynamic history of gene duplication. Interestingly, the pattern of CYC-like diversification in Dipsacaceae is very similar to that of Helianthus annuus, a species of Asteraceae that has been screened for CYC-like genes. Our study also suggests that the number of DpcCYC copies tends to correlate with the distribution of radiate versus discoid inflorescence form, with species bearing radiate heads having more than twice the number of CYC-like genes as discoid species. Investigations of CYC-like genes in discoid members of Asteraceae are needed to assess the generality of this pattern.
Capitulum inflorescences have evolved independently in a number of angiosperm lineages, but perhaps most often within the Campanulidae, a clade of over 30,000 species that includes both the Asteraceae and the Dipsacaceae. Many campanulids produce flat-toped inflorescences containing many small flowers, and this arrangement appears to have set the stage both for the differentiation of enlarged (often sterile and bilaterally symmetrical) flowers around the periphery of the inflorescence (e.g., Viburnum in the Adoxaceae) and for the condensation of the inflorescence into a capitulum (e.g., in Asteraceae and its sister group Calyceraceae; Dipsacaceae; Eryngium and others within Apiaceae). Such inflorescences could have originated in each of these lineages via different pathways, deploying different sets of genes. Instead, our analyses indicate that two widely separated groups within the campanulid angiosperms - Asteraceae and Dipsacaceae - may have taken advantage of gene duplications within the same family of genes.
Fourteen individuals were studied, representing all major subclades of Dipsacaceae, from either herbarium specimens or silica-preserved field collections. Total genomic DNA was extracted using Qiagen DNEasy methods (Qiagen, Valencia, California), or a modified version using beta-Mercaptoethanol and proteinase-K for herbarium specimens . We also included 44 published sequences of outgroups from the Linnina clade  and all ten CYC-like genes published for Helianthus annuus. We used a single copy from Aquilegia (Ranunculaceae) as the outgroup . All taxa used in this study are listed in additional file 1.
Polymerase chain reaction and sequencing
5' to 3'
Phylogenetic alignment and analysis
All clones were assembled in Sequencher (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan) and identified as CYC-like genes based on the conserved amino acid sequence of the TCP domain. Clones were assembled into different sequence "groups" according to shared differences. Members of the same sequence group were generally identical and only varied by obvious polymerase error (single base differences in one or two clones out of several, with different clones being mutated at different sites). A consensus sequence was generated for each group and exported for phylogenetic analysis. We analyzed two different datasets: one with all CYC-like sequences included, and two additional dataset with only members of DpcCYC1 or DpcCYC2B. We analyzed these clades separately in order to align more of the intervening region to aid phylogenetic resolution.
Aligned datasets were generated using Muscle  and adjusted manually in MacClade v. 4.06 . Models of molecular evolution were calculated using AIC (Akaike Information Criteria) scores in ModelTest version 3.7  (model = GTR + G) and implemented in the Bayesian analyses. Bayesian inference analyses were performed using MrBayes version 3.1.2  and two simultaneous runs were initiated from random starting trees. Posterior probabilities of trees were approximated using the Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MC3) algorithm with four incrementally heated chains (T = 0.2) for 20 million generations and sampling trees every 2,000 generations. Convergence and sampling intensity were evaluated using PRSF (all parameters approached 1.0) and ESS (values were greater than 200). The average standard deviation of split frequencies approached 0.01 in all analyses, indicating that each MC3 chain converged to the target distribution. To estimate burn-ins, posterior parameter distributions were viewed using Tracer version 1.4.
ML analyses were conducted using RAxML version 7.0.4 . Tree searches were executed from a random stepwise-addition maximum parsimony tree and employed the GTRGAMMA nucleotide substitution model. ML analyses were run ten times per dataset, starting from ten different starting trees. All free model parameters were estimated with RAxML, with GAMMA model parameters estimated up to an accuracy of 0.1 log likelihood units. Nonparametric bootstrapping under ML was also carried out with RAxML using 1,000 bootstrap replicates.
This research was supported by a U.S. NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant, a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid-of-Research award, and a Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies Field Ecology Pilot Grant to SEC at Yale University. The authors wish to thank the curators of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, and Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II for herbarium material. SEC is grateful to Mariano Avino, Paolo Caputo, Nico Cellinese, Salvatore Cozzolino, Antonino De Natale, Aldo Musacchio, Domenico Gargano, and Lorenzo Peruzzi for help with fieldwork and David Boufford for the photograph of Bassecoia bretschneideri. The authors also wish to thank Vivian Irish for important comments and discussion. Lastly, the authors thank Richard Saunders and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Ohno S: Evolution by gene duplication. 1970, Heidelberg: Springer-VerlagView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M: The origins of genome architecture. 2007, Sunderland, Sinaur AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- Doebley J: Genetics, development and plant evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993, 3: 865-872. 10.1016/0959-437X(93)90006-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carroll SB: Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity. Cell. 2000, 101: 577-580. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80868-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Litt A, Irish VF: Duplication and diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL floral homeotic gene lineage: implications for the evolution of floral development. Genetics. 2003, 165: 821-833.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim S, Yoo MJ, Albert VA, Farris JS, Soltis PS, Soltis DE: Phylogeny and diversification of B-function MADS-box genes in angiosperms: evolutionary and functional implications of a 260 million year old duplication. Am J Bot. 2004, 91: 2102-2118. 10.3732/ajb.91.12.2102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kramer EM, Jaramillo MA, Di Stilio VS: Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics. 2004, 166: 1011-1023. 10.1534/genetics.166.2.1011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kramer EM, Hall JC: Evolutionary dynamics of genes controlling floral development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005, 8: 13-18. 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.09.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zahn LM, Dong H, Leebens-Mack JH, Kim S, Soltis PS, Landherr LL, Soltis DE, dePamphilis CW, Ma H: The evolution of the SEPALLATA subfamily of MADS-Box genes: a preangiosperm origin with multiple duplications throughout angiosperm history. Genetics. 2005, 169: 2209-2223. 10.1534/genetics.104.037770.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ: Phylogenetic analysis of the "ECE" (CYC/TB1) clade reveals duplications predating the core eudicots. PNAS. 2006, 103: 9101-9106. 10.1073/pnas.0602827103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Navaud O, Dabos P, Carnus E, Tremousaygue D, Hervé C: TCP transcription factors predate the emergence of land plants. J Mol Evol. 2007, 65: 23-33. 10.1007/s00239-006-0174-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martín-Trillo M, Cubas P: TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later. Trends in Pl Sci. 2010, 15: 31-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cubas P: Role of TCP genes in the evolution of morphological characters in angiosperms. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Edited by: Cronk QCB, Bateman R, Hawkins J. 2002, London: Taylor and Francis, 247-266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cubas P, Lauter N, Doebley J, Coen E: The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 1999, 18: 215-222. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00444.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ: Duplications in CYC-like genes from Dipsacales correlate with floral form. Int J Pl Sci. 2005, 166: 357-370. 10.1086/428634.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E: Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature. 1995, 383: 794-799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Almeida J, Rocheta M, Galego L: Genetic control of flower shape in Antirrhinum majus. Development. 1997, 124: 1387-1392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corley SB, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Coen E: Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TCP and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. PNAS. 2005, 102: 5068-5073. 10.1073/pnas.0501340102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Broholm SK, Tahtiharju S, Laitinen RAE, Albert VA, Teeri TT, Elomaa P: A TCP domain transcription factor controls flower type specification along the radial axis of the Gerbera (Asteraceae) inflorescence. PNAS. 2008, 105: 9117-9122. 10.1073/pnas.0801359105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim M, Cui M-L, Cubas P, Gillies A, Lee K, Chapman M, Abbott R, Coen E: Regulatory genes control a key morphological and ecological trait transferred between species. Science. 2008, 322: 1116-1119. 10.1126/science.1164371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chapman MA, Leebens-Mack JH, Burke JM: Positive selection and expression divergence following gene duplication in the sunflower CYCLOIDEA gene family. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 1260-1273. 10.1093/molbev/msn001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donoghue MJ, Eriksson T, Reeves PA, Olmstead RA: Phylogeny and phylogenetic taxonomy of Dipsacales, with special reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae). Harvard Pap Bot. 2001, 6: 459-479.Google Scholar
- Carlson SE, Mayer VM, Donoghue MJ: Phylogenetic relationships, taxonomy, and morphological evolution in Dipsacaceae (Dipsacales) inferred by DNA sequence data. Taxon. 2009, 58: 1075-1091.Google Scholar
- Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ: Duplications and expression of DIVARICATA-Like genes in Dipsacales. Mol Biol Evol. 2009, 26: 1245-1258. 10.1093/molbev/msp051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galego L, Almeida J: Role of DIVARICATA in the control of dorsoventral asymmetry in Antirrhinum flowers. Genes Dev. 2003, 16: 880-891.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donoghue MJ, Bell CD, Winkworth RC: The evolution of reproductive characters in Dipsacales. Int J Plant Sci. 2003, 164: S453-S464. 10.1086/376874.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verlaque R: Étude biosystématique et phylogénétique des Dipsacaceae III. - Tribus des Knautieae et des Dipsaceae. Rev Cytol Biol Veg Le Botaniste. 1985, 8: 171-243.Google Scholar
- Verlaque R: Étude biosystématique et phylogénétique des Dipsacaceae IV. - Tribus des Scabioseae (phylum #1, 2, 3). Rev Cytol Biol Veg Le Botaniste. 1986, 9: 5-72.Google Scholar
- Verlaque R: Étude biosystématique et phylogénétique des Dipsacaceae IV. - Tribus des Scabioseae (phylum #4) et conclusion. Rev Cytol Biol Veg Le Botaniste. 1986, 9: 97-176.Google Scholar
- Caputo P, Cozzolino S, Moretti A: Molecular phylogenetics of Dipsacaceae reveals parallel trends in seed dispersal syndromes. Pl Syst Evol. 2004, 246: 163-175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Avino M, Tortoriella G, Caputo P: A phylogenetic analysis of Dipsacaceae based on four DNA regions. Pl Syst Evol. 2009, 279: 69-86. 10.1007/s00606-009-0147-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Damerval C, Le Gulloux M, Jager M, Charon C: Diversity and evolution of CYCLOIDEA-like TCP genes in relation to flower development in Papaveraceae. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143: 759-772.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kolsch A, Gleissberg S: Diversification of CYCLOIDEA-like TCP genes in the basal eudicot families Fumariacaeae and Papaveraceae s.str. Plant Biol. 2006, 8: 680-687. 10.1055/s-2006-924286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayer V, Ehrendorfer F: Fruit differentiation, palynology, and systematics in the Scabiosa group of genera and Pseudoscabiosa (Dipsacales). Pl Syst Evol. 1999, 216: 135-166. 10.1007/BF00985103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aguilar-Martínez JA, Poza-Carrión C, Cubas P: Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell. 2007, 19: 458-472. 10.1105/tpc.106.048934.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lukens L, Doebley J: Molecular evolution of the teosinte branched gene among maize and related grasses. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 627-638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillies ACM, Coen ES, Abbott RJ: Making rays in the Asteraceae: genetics and evolution of variation for radiate versus discoid flower heads. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Edited by: Cronk QCB, Bateman R, Hawkins J. 2002, London: Taylor and Francis, 237-246.Google Scholar
- Lynch M, Force AG: The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am Nat. 2000, 156: 590-605. 10.1086/316992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wurdack KJ, Hoffmann P, Samuel R, de Bruiijn A, van der Bank M, Chase MW: Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Phyllanthaceae (Phyllanthoideae pro parte, Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) using plastid RBCL DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2004, 91: 1882-1900. 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1882.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl Acid Res. 2004, 32: 1792-97. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maddison WP, Maddison DR: MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. 2000, Sunderland, Sinaur AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA: MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics Applications Note. 1998, 14: 817-818.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J: A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web-Servers. Syst Biol. 2008, 57: 758-771. 10.1080/10635150802429642.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tank DC, Donoghue MJ: Phylogeny and phylogenetic nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an expanded sample of genes and taxa. Syst Bot. 2010, 35: 425-441. 10.1600/036364410791638306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar