Skip to main content


Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 3 AICc comparisons of nested models for fraction of antagonistic QTL and QTL effect size

From: Comparing the adaptive landscape across trait types: larger QTL effect size in traits under biotic selection

Model number of parameters LL AICc AICc weights
A: fraction of antagonistic QTL     
global 16 808.24 -1583.46 0.0005
abiotic/biotic removed 8 807.43 -1598.60 0.9994
B: QTL effect size     
global 16 -1597.42 3227.12 0.82
abiotic/biotic removed 8 -1607.06 3230.20 0.18
  1. Nested GLM models of fraction of antagonistic QTL (A), and QTL effect size (B). LL (log likelihood) values and AICc values, used to calculate AICc weights, are shown for more complex global models including all parameters, as well as models with abiotic v. biotic status removed. AICc weights indicate the relative support of the data for each of the models.