Skip to main content

Table 4 Mitchell-Olds and Shaw constrained regression tests for fitness minimum/maximum indicating quadratic selection

From: Widespread disruptive selection in the wild is associated with intense resource competition

Pond

Map ID

F min

P min

F max

P max

fitness min/max

AZ0604

3

5.124

.028

10.522

.002

Y

AZ0605

4

48.257

<.0001

80.282

<.0001

Y

AZ0607

6

12.177

.0007

5.311

.024

Y

NM0608

7

7.810

.005

16.573

<.0001

Y

AZ0710

8

12.492

.0006

30.103

<.0001

Y

AZ0711

9

28.468

<.0001

1.559

.214

N

AZ0801

11

31.686

<.0001

8.232

.005

Y

AZ0810

12

23.971

<.0001

61.126

<.0001

Y

AZ0811

13

21.384

<.0001

38.224

<.0001

Y

AZ0816

14

85.242

<.0001

172.109

<.0001

Y

AZ0802

16

24.155

<.0001

10.773

.001

Y

AZ0812

17

20.838

<.0001

36.537

<.0001

Y

AZ0813

18

5.154

.024

14.562

.0002

Y

NM0810

19

10.912

.001

16.500

<.0001

Y

AZ0903

20

.083

.773

.317

.574

N

AZ0902

21

1.691

.194

14.560

.0001

N

AZ0904

22

39.010

<.0001

9.252

.002

Y

  1. For each population the pond name, map ID corresponding to Figure 1, test statistics and results evaluating if the null hypotheses that fitness minimum/maximum lie at extreme minimum and maximum phenotypic values (rather than within the observed range of the data) can be rejected.
Back to article page

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us