Skip to main content

Table 4 Gene diversities and nucleotide diversities for each conservation and management unit

From: MHC class II DQB diversity in the Japanese black bear, Ursus thibetanus japonicus

  

MHC DQBexon 2 region (267 bp)

mtDNA control region (Yasukochi et al. 2009)

 

Conservation and management unit

No. of samples

No. of alleles

H e

H o

Ï€ S

No. of samples

No. of haplotypes

h

Ï€

Eastern Japan

Gassan-Asahi Iide (GAI)

21

4

0.48 ± 0.08

0.33

0.018 ± 0.009

6

5

0.93 ± 0.12

0.011 ± 0.008

 

Echigo-Mikuni (EM)

13

7

0.79 ± 0.05

0.69

0.024 ± 0.011

16

7

0.82 ± 0.07

0.009 ± 0.006

 

North-Central Alps (NCA)

12

10

0.85 ± 0.05 *

0.33 *

0.022 ± 0.010

23

8

0.85 ± 0.05

0.011 ± 0.007 d

 

Hakusan-Okumino (HO)

36

18

0.76± 0.05 *

0.39 *

0.019 ± 0.008

74

8

0.72 ± 0.03

0.010 ± 0.006

Western Japan

Northern Kinki (NK)

23

8

0.68 ± 0.06

0.56

0.016 ± 0.008

96 (64)

4

0.75 ± 0.03

0.011 ± 0.007

 

Eastern Chugoku (EC)

8

7

0.83±0.07*

0.38*

0.013 ± 0.007

31 (22)

2

0.25 ± 0.10

0.003 ± 0.002

 

Western Chugoku (WC)

53

11

0.33 ± 0.06 *

0.19 *

0.005± 0.003

154 (33)

6

0.56 ± 0.04

0.005 ± 0.004

 

Shikoku (SK)

9

6

0.73 ± 0.10*

0.33*

0.021 ± 0.010

11 c

2

0.55 ± 0.07

0.009 ± 0.006

 

Overall

175

44

0.65 ± 0.03 *

0.36 *

0.016 ± 0.007

455

24

0.90 ± 0.01

0.013 ± 0.008

  1. Bold character indicates conservation and management units which have more than 10 samples. Chokai Sanchi, Southern Ouu, Southern Alps and Kii Hanto units are excluded due to small number of samples. He: the expected heterozygosity; Ho: the observed heterozygosity. πS or π: the nucleotide diversity. h: the haplotype diversity. *: a significant departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.01). ( ): the number of haplotype data analyzed by [5]. a: the number includes subhaplotypes. b: the number was taken from the result of an identification of individuals using microsatellite analysis [90] because samples were obtained by hair trap. c: the number is samples that are newly added to samples used in our previous study [8]. d: the π value described in [8] (π = 0.001) was incorrect, and 0.01 was a correct value.