Isolation with differentiation followed by expansion with admixture in the tunicate Pyura chilensis

Haye, Pilar A; Muñoz-Herrera, Natalia C

doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-252

BMC Ecology and Evolution

Table 5 Estimated demographic parameters for COI haplogroups and EF1a haplotypes of Pyura chilensis

From: Isolation with differentiation followed by expansion with admixture in the tunicate Pyura chilensis

				Demographic expansion				Geographic expansion
	Site	D	F	SSD	P(SSD)	r	P(r)	SSD	P(SSD)	r	P(r)
All COI	PA	-2.09	-3.01	0.006	0.20	0.031	0.15	0.006	0.20	0.031	0.45
	CP	-1.66	-2.43	0.014	0.30	0.015	0.60	0.014	0.15	0.015	0.60
	PC	-1.96	-2.68	0.012	0.25	0.013	0.75	0.012	0.10	0.013	0.95
	LH	-1.19	-2.26	0.019	0.20	0.008	0.90	0.019	0.20	0.008	0.50
	PV	-1.69	-2.51	0.017	0.20	0.013	0.55	0.017	0.25	0.013	0.75
	TL	-0.38	-1.22	0.035	0.25	0.024	0.55	0.029	0.45	0.024	1.00
	LM	0.70	0.09	0.020	0.00	0.009	0.30	0.024	0.35	0.009	0.95
	AC	-0.99	-2.62	0.050	0.00	0.031	0.15	0.037	0.45	0.031	0.85
	ALL	-1.73	-3.49	0.194	0.00	0.008	1.00	0.025	0.20	0.008	0.90
HG1 (COI)	PA	-2.09	-3.01	0.006	0.24	0.031	0.21	0.006	0.22	0.031	0.23
	CP	-2.10	-3.40	0.001	0.74	0.019	0.54	0.001	0.74	0.019	0.65
	PC	-2.29	-3.21	0.001	0.83	0.019	0.75	0.001	0.85	0.019	0.68
	LH	-2.11	-3.21	0.005	0.23	0.013	0.92	0.001	0.94	0.013	0.90
	PV	-2.24	-3.26	0.002	0.66	0.020	0.58	0.002	0.62	0.020	0.53
	TL	-2.21	-3.19	0.169	0.02	0.048	0.95	0.009	0.60	0.048	0.70
	LM	-1.53	-1.70	0.028	0.27	0.084	0.29	0.025	0.43	0.084	0.38
	AC	-1.18	-1.07	0.031	0.35	0.109	0.56	0.019	0.56	0.109	0.77
	ALL	-2.56	-5.13	0.0003	0.51	0.018	0.56	0.0002	0.83	0.018	0.62
HG2 (COI)	CP	-0.81	-0.78	0.134	0.23	0.528	0.23	0.125	0.46	0.528	0.38
	PC	-1.20	-0.88	0.052	0.52	0.167	0.70	0.053	0.60	0.167	0.79
	LH	-1.70	-1.99	0.007	0.71	0.042	0.70	0.007	0.80	0.042	0.77
	PV	-1.12	-1.16	0.093	0.40	0.230	0.60	0.867	0.37	0.230	0.76
	TL	-0.44	-0.68	0.014	0.78	0.046	0.87	0.019	0.70	0.046	0.90
	LM	-0.76	-0.61	0.063	0.15	0.242	0.15	0.060	0.12	0.242	0.16
	AC	-0.66	-0.84	0.037	0.14	0.088	0.25	0.043	0.13	0.088	0.42
	ALL	-2.05	-4.00	0.0055	0.64	0.018	0.88	0.0077	0.64	0.018	0.92
HG 3 (COI)	LM	-1.60	-1.92	0.004	0.57	0.015	0.84	0.004	0.58	0.015	0.80
	AC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	ALL	-1.53	-1.67	0.0044	0.47	0.016	0.72	0.0044	0.46	0.0156	0.77
EF1a	PA	0.62	0.20	0.010	0.15	0.064	0.16	0.009	0.12	0.064	0.17
	CP	0.19	0.29	0.002	0.74	0.020	0.87	0.003	0.66	0.020	0.94
	PC	0.06	-0.88	0.008	0.38	0.040	0.44	0.008	0.39	0.040	0.59
	LH	0.03	0.14	0.008	0.09	0.069	0.08	0.008	0.04	0.069	0.07
	PV	0.02	-0.28	0.013	0.28	0.059	0.34	0.011	0.41	0.059	0.49
	TL	0.24	0.03	0.005	0.27	0.045	0.25	0.005	0.31	0.045	0.31
	LM	-0.32	-0.58	0.016	0.24	0.062	0.28	0.013	0.42	0.062	0.42
	AC	-0.20	-0.98	0.005	0.20	0.034	0.43	0.004	0.30	0.034	0.47
	ALL	-0.27	-0.13	0.007	0.10	0.044	0.05	0.006	0.05	0.044	0.10

Tajima’s D (D); Fu & Li’s F (F); Significant values in bold. Sum of square deviation of the mismatch frequency distribution of the number of pairwise nucleotide differences (SSD); probability associated to SSD (P(SSD)); Harpending’s raggedness index (r); probability associated to r (P(r)). Values of SSD and r calculated for mismatch distribution expectations according to the demographic expansion model and the geographic expansion model.

Back to article page

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com