Molecular evidence for convergent evolution and allopolyploid speciation within the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrellaspecies complex
© Beike et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 19 December 2013
Accepted: 4 July 2014
Published: 11 July 2014
The moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp. is an important experimental model system for evolutionary-developmental studies. In order to shed light on the evolutionary history of Physcomitrella and related species within the Funariaceae, we analyzed the natural genetic diversity of the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex.
Molecular analysis of the nuclear single copy gene BRK1 reveals that three Physcomitrium species feature larger genome sizes than Physcomitrella patens and encode two expressed BRK1 homeologs (polyploidization-derived paralogs), indicating that they may be allopolyploid hybrids. Phylogenetic analyses of BRK1 as well as microsatellite simple sequence repeat (SSR) data confirm a polyphyletic origin for three Physcomitrella lineages. Differences in the conservation of mitochondrial editing sites further support hybridization and cryptic speciation within the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex.
We propose a revised classification of the previously described four subspecies of Physcomitrella patens into three distinct species, namely Physcomitrella patens, Physcomitrella readeri and Physcomitrella magdalenae. We argue that secondary reduction of sporophyte complexity in these species is due to the establishment of an ecological niche, namely spores resting in mud and possible spore dispersal by migratory birds. Besides the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex, the Funariaceae are host to their type species, Funaria hygrometrica, featuring a sporophyte morphology which is more complex. Their considerable developmental variation among closely related lineages and remarkable trait evolution render the Funariaceae an interesting group for evolutionary and genetic research.
A major goal in evolutionary biology is to understand the processes that generate new species. Until recently, genetic analyses of species differences have relied on a small number of model systems. Here we examine patterns of divergence among relatives of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp., the first bryophyte with completely sequenced and well-annotated nuclear, plastid and mitochondrial genomes [1–4]. P. patens belongs to the Funariaceae, a family of small, terricolous mosses with highly diverse sporophyte morphology. In contrast to other Funariaceae, Physcomitrella is characterized by a short sporophyte lacking many of the ornamentations typical in mosses. The history of the genus was reviewed by Tan . The Index Muscorum  listed four species in the genus Physcomitrella. Of the four taxa, Physcomitrella austro-patens Broth. and P. californica H.A. Crum and L.E. Anderson were treated later as synonyms of P. readeri (Müll. Hall.) I.G. Stone & G.A.M. Scott. Physcomitrella hampei Limpr. was interpreted as a hybrid species [5–7]. However, based on variable but overlapping phenotypic characteristics, a revised classification of the genus Physcomitrella was subsequently proposed by Tan , which described Physcomitrella as one single polymorphic species with four subspecies, namely P. patens ssp. patens from Europe, P. patens ssp. readeri (Müll. Hal.) B.C. Tan from Australia, P. patens ssp. californica (H.A. Crum & L.E. Anderson) B.C. Tan from California (North America) and Japan, and P. patens ssp. magdalenae (de Sloover) B.C. Tan from Rwanda (Africa). Currently, the majority of bryologists accept three separate species, namely Physcomitrella patens, P. readeri and P. magdalenae De Sloover. P. patens has a wide distribution in the Northern Hemisphere, P. readeri is found in California (North America), Australia and Japan , while P. magdalenae has been reported from Rwanda, Africa [9, 10]. Recent data suggest that the Physcomitrella phenotype arose three times within the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex, based on phylogenetic analyses of nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA sequence data [11, 12]. Here, the species complex is defined as a taxonomic group of intergraded phenotypes that hinders separation based on morphological traits. Due to the fact that Physcomitrella has been classified as a single species based on similar morphological characters of the sporophytes, it has been argued that such characters should not be used for classification . In order to test the polyphyletic origin of the genus Physcomitrella and to analyze whether monophyletic groups corresponding to species can be resolved within Physcomitrella, we performed phylogenetic analyses of a nuclear single copy gene (BRK1)  and microsatellite simple sequence repeat (SSR) data amplified from numerous accessions covering all four Physcomitrella subspecies and further Funariaceae.
Regarding the sequenced P. patens strain from Gransden (Europe), the haploid chromosome number of n = 27 for meiotic and mitotic cells [14, 15] provides evidence for a complex history of polyploidization, since the base number of chromosomes is reported to be n = 4–7 among mosses [16–18]. Genome duplication or polyploidization is an important mechanism of eukaryotic evolution [19–22] and considered to be of particular relevance in the speciation and diversification of land plants. Molecular data have confirmed that P. patens is a paleopolyploid that underwent at least one whole-genome duplication event approximately 45 MYA during the Eocene . However, some other Funariaceae from within the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex have even higher chromosome numbers ranging, e.g., from n = 9 to n = 72 for Physcomitrium pyriforme, or n = 9 to n = 54 for Physcomitrium eurystomum. Taking this into account, along with the fact that some Funariaceae show interfertility [5, 12, 24, 25], a considerable number of polyploids, including allopolyploid hybrid species, can be expected. Natural hybrids among the Funariaceae, typically characterized by intermediate sporophytic characteristics [26, 27], have also been described from the field [28–31]. The putative hybrid origin of Physcomitrium collenchymatum and P. eurystomum was recently been suggested based on molecular data and genealogical analyses of six different loci, including ribosomal, plastidic, and nuclear marker genes . However, scarce evidence for polyploidization-derived paralogs (homeologs) of single copy genes in the analyzed Physcomitrium species has been shown to date.
In this study, we analyzed genome sizes and homeologs of the nuclear single copy gene BRK1 across a broad range of Funariaceae accessions in order to test whether species belonging to the genus Physcomitrium are allopolyploid hybrids. We chose BRK1 as a phylogenetic marker gene as it is a single copy gene in nearly all of the land plant genomes sequenced to date (Additional file 1: Figure S2). In addition, we assessed the requirement of RNA editing sites to be edited, since out of 13 P. patens editing sites (cytidines which are post-transcriptionally changed into uridines) [32, 33] three are not present in Funaria hygrometrica, thus rendering the pattern of editing site gain and loss a potentially informative evolutionary feature within the Funariaceae. Based on phylogenetic analysis of the novel marker gene BRK1, microsatellite-derived genetic distances and different editing patterns, we have revised the Physcomitrella subspecies sensu Tan  and hypothesize on speciation and the mode of spore dispersal in Physcomitrella.
Funariaceae in vitrocollection, culture and observation
Funariaceae species collection
Gransden Wood, Huntigdonshire, UK
Nene Washes, Cambridge, UK
Cholsey, Berkshire, UK
Bad Honnef, Grafenwerth, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Heimerbrühl, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Nennig, Saarland, Germany
Martinshof, Saarland, Germany
Villersexel, Haute Saône, France (K3 + K4)
Wik castle, Uppsala, Sweden
Nilsson, Thelander, Olsson, Ronne
Gemünd, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany (K5)
Gemünd, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany (K1) (var. megapolitana)
Kaskaskia Island, Illinois, USA
Sargent & Vitt
Del Valle Lake, California, USA
Kumamoto, Shisui-cho, Kyushu, Japan
Ono & Deguchi
Saitama, Iwatsuki-shi, Honshu, Japan
Okayama, Honshu, Japan
Melton Reservoir, Victoria, Australia
Stajsic & Klazenga
Mt. Bisoke, Ruhengeri, Rwanda
Solga & Buchbender
Grosshartmannsdorf, Osterzgebirge, Sachsen, Germany
Imsbach-Aue, Saarland, Germany
Vellescot, Territore-de-Belfort, France
Neukirch, Allgäu West, Wangen, Bodenseekreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Neustadt, Thüringen, Germany
Schleiz, Thüringen, Germany
Bischofswerda, Sachsen, Germany
Nordhausen, Liebenrode, Thüringen, Germany
Waltershof, Gera, Thüringen, Germany
Haardtrand, Ebekoben, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Övergran, Biskops-Arnö, Uppland, Sweden
Durham, Orange County, North Carolina, USA
Shaw Nature Reserve, Franklin County, MO, USA (K1, K2A, K2B)
Allen & Darigo
Durham, Orange County, North Carolina, USA
Durham, Orange County, North Carolina, USA
Plants were cultivated on solid mineral Knop medium  as previously described . For standardized observation of gametophytic features, plants were grown on Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) wrapped with laboratory film. Environmental conditions were set to 22 degrees Celsius and a long day (16 h light, 8 h dark) light cycle (white light at 70 μmol * s-1 * m-2). Plants were established by transfer of individual gametophores, and observed under a stereo binocular (Zeiss, Germany) after several weeks to months of growth.
Genomic DNA extraction
Genomic DNA was extracted from moss tissue following the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method described by . Up to 100 mg of moss material was disrupted with a Tissue Lyser (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and incubated for 30 min in 700 μL CTAB buffer (2 % CTAB, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 0.5 % PVP 40, 100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0; 0.2 % 2-mercaptoethanol [v/v] added before use). Subsequently, 600 μL chloroform:isoamylalcohol (24:1) was added. Phase separation was reached after vigorous mixing by centrifugation (16,100 × g) for 5 min. The aqueous phase was transferred to a fresh tube and 2/3 [v:v] isopropanol was added for precipitation at -20 °C overnight. The DNA was sedimented by centrifugation (20,817 x g) for 30–45 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed twice with 200 μL of 70 % ethanol. After centrifugation (16,100 x g), the supernatant was removed. DNA was dissolved in 100 μL TE buffer (0.1 M TrisHCl, 0.01 M EDTA, pH 7.5 with HCl). For RNAse digestion, 10 μg RNAse A (10 mg/mL, Thermo Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) were added and the DNA was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. RNAse digestion was controlled and DNA concentration was determined by gel electrophoresis in 1 % agarose gels.
Amplification of BRK1from genomic DNA
A part of the nuclear gene BRK1 (Pp1s35_157V6.1) was amplified using the primers BRICK1_for: GTCGGCATTGCTGTACAA and BRICK1_rev: CTCCAGCTGACGCTCCAG. The PCR was performed in 20 μL reaction volume containing 2 μL 10 × Buffer E (Genaxxon, Biberach, Germany), 0.4 μL deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs, 10 mM, Thermo Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany), 1.25 U Taq polymerase (Genaxxon, Biberach), 0.5 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μL) and 1 μL genomic DNA (50–100 ng/μL). The PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by cycling conditions which consisted of a denaturation step of 45 s at 94 °C, annealing at 52 °C for 1 min and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min for a total of 30 cycles. The PCR products were eluted and purified from a 1 % agarose gel with the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cloning of BRK1and plasmid DNA extraction
Direct sequencing of BRK1PCR products and of plasmid clones
In total, 10–50 ng/μL of the purified PCR product were sent for sequencing to GATC Biotech AG (Konstanz, Germany) using the primers BRICK1_for and BRICK1_rev. Plasmid DNA was sent in concentrations of 30–100 ng/μL and Sanger sequenced (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany) with a standard sequencing primer for the blunt end vector pJET1.2/blunt (Thermo Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). For accessions with polymorphic direct PCR sequencing products, up to 10 plasmid DNAs from independent clones were sent for sequencing, respectively. Sequences which were obtained at least twice independently were considered true and used for phylogenetic analyses. Exceptions to this were both sequences of BRK1 for one P. pyriforme accession (Nordhausen, Europe), and one sequence representing one locus of P. collenchymatum (Shaw Nature Reserve, Franklin County, MO, USA) which were each obtained only once. These sequences were included into further analyses since they were found to be identical to corresponding sequences of other accessions from the same species.
The sequence chromatograms were analyzed with the ChromasPro software, version 1.34 (http://www.technelysium.com.au/ChromasPro.html). Multiple sequence alignments were calculated with MUSCLE 3.51  and visualized with Jalview . The gene structure of BRK1 was annotated within the multiple sequence alignment according to the gene structure found in P. patens (Pp1s35_157V6.1, Additional file 3: Figure S1). Neighbor-joining analysis was performed with QUICKTREE_SD [41, 42] using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian inference was carried out with MrBayes , using the GTR model with eight gamma distributed rates, invariant sites, two hot and two cold chains, burn-in 250 and two million generations, until the standard deviation of split frequencies dropped below 0.01. Maximum likelihood inference was carried out with TREE-PUZZLE  using the GTR model with eight gamma-distributed rates, quartet puzzling (10,000 steps) and exact parameter estimation. While the Maximum Likelihood tree is shown, support values from all three methods are plotted on the tree (see legend). The tree was visualized with FigTree v1.1.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
RNA editing analysis
DNA was prepared from plant material using the extraction method described by . Primer pairs bordering regions of nad3, nad4, nad5 (subunits of complex I, amplicon length 343 bp, 392 bp and 459 bp, respectively), cox1 (subunit of complex IV, 252 bp), rps14 (ribosomal protein S14, 246 bp) and ccmFC (cytochrome biogenesis factor subunit C, 210 bp) harboring mitochondrial editing sites identified in the P. patens accession from Gransden , were used for PCR assays. Amplification assays were performed as described . PCR products were gel-purified using the HiYield PCR Clean-up & Gel-Extraction kit (Südlaborbedarf GmbH, Gauting, Germany) or purified using ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, USA) and Sanger sequenced (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany). DNA sequences were aligned to the corresponding coding sequences of P. patens and Funaria hygrometrica using Mega 5.0  and putative editing sites were identified via PREPACT 2.0 .
Amplification of EST-derived microsatellites
Genomic DNA was extracted as previously described . Sixty-four simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci with available polymorphism information content (Table http://www.cosmoss.org/376_PCR_tested_SSRs.xls on http://www.cosmoss.org/genmap.content) were chosen from a collection of EST-derived microsatellites . In total, 49 loci were found to be suitable by means of PCR, using the respective first primer pair listed; the SSR numbering in Additional file 4: Table S2 corresponds to the one in the above mentioned original data. SSR loci were amplified in a 20 μL PCR mix containing 2 μl of 10 × RED-Taq-PCR buffer, 0.1 mM dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 5 pmol each of two primers, 0.5 U RED-Taq-Polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany) and 4 ng genomic DNA. PCR was carried out starting with an initial DNA denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min. The first cycle consisted of 30 s denaturation at 92 °C, with primer annealing for 30 s at 60 °C and elongation for 30 s at 72 °C. In each of the 10 subsequent cycles, the annealing temperature was decreased by 0.7 °C. The final 25 cycles consisted of 15 s denaturation at 92 °C, 15 s primer annealing at 52 °C and 30 s elongation at 72 °C. SSR PCR products were size separated in 3 % MetaPhor (Cambrex Corporation, East Rutherford, USA) high resolution agarose by gel electrophoresis in 0.5 fold TBE (45 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
SSR data analysis
SSR loci were scored manually for all included accessions according to their amplified fragment size. Distinguishable sizes were scored as different alleles; indistinguishable sizes were scored as the same allele (Additional file 4: Table S2). Absence of PCR products was scored as a haploid null allele. The data set included all Physcomitrella accessions as well as Physcomitrium sphaericum (Additional file 2: Table S1). Genetic distances were calculated with Nei’s DA distance algorithm . The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the Neighbor-Joining algorithm  using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. For genetic distance and phylogenetic tree calculations the software POPULATION 1.2.28  was used and the tree was visualized using FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). In addition, the different sized alleles derived from the 49 SSR loci were transformed into 170 binary presence/absence characters (null alleles were scored as gaps). The binary encoding might overestimate variation, but was necessary since SplitsTree does not allow presentation of the data in a continuous fashion. Based on this matrix (Additional file 4: Table S2), SplitsTree 4  was used to calculate GeneContent distances and a bootstrapped (1,000 replicates) NeighborNet.
Genome sizes of Funariaceae
Genome size [1c]
0.96 ± 0.15
0.96 ± 0.05
0.78 ± 0.43
1.27 ± 0.32*
1.51 ± 0.44
1.33 ± 0.42*
0.44 ± 0.03*
Sequencing of BRK1transcripts from six selected Funariaceae
Total RNA was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by on-column DNAse digestion. The resulting RNA samples from P. patens from Gransden (Europe), three accessions from P. eurystomum (Neukirch, Neustadt and Schleiz, Germany) and two accessions from P. collenchymatum (Shaw Nature Reserve, Franklin County, MO, USA) were reverse transcribed using Superscript III (Invitrogen™, Karlsruhe, Germany). The reverse primer BRK1_rev (CACCGTTAGCTTCTCGTTCA) was used for priming the first strand synthesis. The resulting cDNA was then further amplified using both BRK1 primers, BRK1_for (GACAATCGCCATTTTTCGAG) and BRK1_rev, and subsequently Sanger sequenced (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany). The primers used were selected based on multiple sequence alignment of clonal sequences.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR and high-resolution-melting
Total RNA was extracted and cDNA was synthesized as described above. cDNA synthesis was verified by PCR. Primers for quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) were designed to specifically amplify a 129 bp long fragment of the exon containing polymorphisms in P. collenchymatum (BRK1_for: GACAATCGCCATTTTTCGAG and BRK1_rev CACCGTTAGCTTCTCGTTCA). Each qPCR was carried out using the SensiMix HRM kit (Bioline, Lickenwalde, Germany) on a LightCycler480 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) with the following parameters: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95 °C, 60 °C and 72 °C, for 15 s each. High resolution melting analysis was subsequently carried out from 65 °C to 95 °C with a ramp rate of 0.02 °C/s. Melting curve data were analyzed using the Gene Scanning software (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and a sensitivity setting of 0.4 with auto-grouping. Pre-melt and post-melt temperatures were chosen in the range of 77 °C and 84 °C respectively.
Paralogs of the single copy gene BRK1 and enlarged genome sizes provide evidence for allopolyploid hybrid Physcomitriumspecies
Sequence polymorphisms of BRK1
BRK1sequence length (nucleotides)
Polymorphisms (exon/intron); gaps
27 (1/26); 1
26 (2/24); 1
19 (0/19); 5
Flow cytometric measurements were performed for all Funariaceae for which the BRK1 sequence was available, including multiple accessions of Physcomitrella, P. pyriforme, P. eurystomum and P. collenchymatum (Additional file 2: Table S1). All accessions of Physcomitrella show a comparable genome size as P. patens from Gransden (Europe), whereas P. pyriforme, P. eurystomum and P. collenchymatum have a larger size (Table 2), albeit P. collenchymatum not significantly (p > 0.05, one-sided t-test). These higher amounts of DNA, together with the BRK1 homeologs, indicate that P. pyriforme, P. collenchymatum and P. eurystomum are recent allopolyploids.
Expression patterns of BRK1 homeologs in Physcomitriumspecies
BRK1 as a phylogenetic marker confirms polyphyletic origin of three Physcomitrellaspecies
Based on the high conservation of BRK1 (Additional file 1: Figure S2) and on the fact that the encoding gene BRK1 harbors an intron, we expected the nucleic acid sequence to represent a suitable phylogenetic marker to resolve relationships within the Funariaceae. Different methods of tree inference based on the nucleic acid sequences (exon/intron) all led to essentially the same topology, separating the Funaria sequences from four well supported clades (Additional file 6: Figure S3). The three clades representing Physcomitrella from Europe and North America (ssp. patens and ssp. californica), Physcomitrella from Australia and Japan (ssp. readeri and ssp. californica) and P. patens ssp. magdalenae from Africa are distinct in the BRK1-based phylogeny (Figure 2, Additional file 6: Figure S3). This confirms a polyphyletic origin of these three lineages as previously proposed [11, 12] and supports that accessions of P. patens ssp. californica (Del Valle Lake, California and two accessions from Japan) actually belong to two different clades. Moreover, A. serratum clusters in a clade together with P. patens ssp. patens and may therefore be considered to belong to the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella complex as well.
Genic microsatellites support high genetic distances within the genus Physcomitrella
The pattern of editing sites supports independent speciation of Physcomitrella and hybridization of Physcomitrium
Clustering of A. serratum to the P. patens clade, as shown in the BRK1-based phylogeny, was confirmed by the same editing requirements of A. serratum and P. patens ssp. patens in contrast to Funaria (Figure 7). All P. pyriforme isolates showed a T at position nad3eU230SL and a C at position nad4eU272SL at the DNA level (Figure 7), congruent with P. pyriforme being a hybrid species derived from divergent parental lines. The P. collenchymatum and P. eurystomum, as well as the Physcomitrium sphaericum editing sites nad3eU230SL and nad4eU272SL, are akin to the P. patens ssp. patens clade (Figure 7). The scenario of P. patens ssp. magdalenae developing from the same parental line as P. pyriforme and P. eurystomum is further supported by a site to be edited, ccmFCeU52RC, exclusively identified in accessions of these three lineages. An additional putative editing site in nad5, nad5eU446SL, is only shared by P. pyriforme and P. patens ssp. magdalenae.
In vitrocomparison of gametophytic morphological features
Since sporophytic features are not suitable for distinguishing Physcomitrella species, we compared gametophytes grown under identical in vitro conditions. The Californian accession (Additional file 8: Figure S4D, Additional file 9: Figure S5D, Additional file 10: Figure S6B) deviates from the European accessions (Additional file 8: Figure S4A-C, Additional file 9: Figure S5A-C, Additional file 10: Figure S6A) by developing much smaller gametophores with smaller leaflets (i.e., non-vascular leaves or phyllids; cf. Plant Ontology term PO:0025075). However, consistent with the European accessions, the leaflets of the Californian accession develop a costa in most cases, albeit less pronounced and extending to only three quarters of the leaflets (Additional file 10: Figure S6A, S6B). In the Japanese and the Australian accessions the gametophores and leaflets (Additional file 8: Figures S4E, Additional file 9: Figure S5G-I) are much smaller, typically less than half the size as compared to P. patens from Gransden (Europe, Additional file 8: Figure S4A, Additional file 9: Figure S5A, Additional file 10: Figure S6A), comparable to the Californian accession (Additional file 10: Figure S6B, S6C). However, the leaflets do not develop a costa except in very rare cases where a costa may be present, reaching at most half the length of the leaflets (Additional file 10: Figure S6C). The leaflets of the African accession (Additional file 8: Figure S4F, Additional file 9: Figure S5F) are the largest among all analyzed accessions, with up to twice the surface of the European accessions (Additional file 10: Figure S6D). They are orbiculate and much broader than the lanceloate leaflets of the other accessions (Additional file 10: Figures S6D). In summary, leaflet shape and the presence of a costa might be useful to distinguish the Physcomitrella accessions, while leaflet/gametophore size seemed rather variable. Of course, this comparison was done only for single accessions from in vitro cultivated Funariaceae and one can therefore expect more morphological variance in the field as well as from other accessions grown under in vitro conditions.
Hybridization and polyploidization among the Funariaceae
Here we present data showing that convergent evolution and allopolyploidization are associated with the generation of new species in the Funariaceae. Interspecific hybridization among mosses is an underestimated evolutionary phenomenon . Both, artificial crossings [24, 25, 27, 54] and naturally occurring hybrids have previously been described for the Funariaceae [28–31].
Previously,  reported that Physcomitrium collenchymatum and P. eurystomum are hybrid species, putatively produced from hybridizations between ancestors of modern P. sphaericum and P. pyriforme. This was based on the observation that these species contained specific polymorphisms (i.e., sphaericum and pyriforme-like alleles) at four nuclear loci (adk, apr, ho1 and papr). However, each haploid individual generally contained either the sphaericum or pyriforme-like allele, but never both. This finding was consistent with either homoploid hybrid speciation, or allopolyploid speciation, followed by a loss of one homeolog at each of these loci (fractionation). The one exception to this pattern was the ho1 locus where four European isolates of P. pyriforme contained two divergent copies of this locus.
Here we found that P. eurystomum, P. collenchymatum, and five European isolates of P. pyriforme have genome sizes larger than those of their putative parent lineages, while they also contain two divergent paralogs of BRK1. For these data to be explained by a homoploid hybrid speciation event, we would have to assume both a massive expansion of transposable elements  and parallel duplications of the BRK1 locus. Alternatively, these data might reflect an allopolyploidization event followed by the loss of one paralog at the adk, apr, (ho1) and papr loci, a process called fractionation. Our current data do not allow to unambiguously rule out homoploid hybrid speciation, but the frequency of homeolog loss following polyploidy in a wide range of organisms  suggests that fractionation may be a more plausible explanation. A comparative analysis of the genome-wide patterns of paralog-loss or retention could potentially provide insights into the genetic interactions among loci or dosage sensitivity.
The evolutionary success of hybrids is also known for seed plants, where allopolyploid offspring are sometimes more successful than the parental lines [21, 22]. Contrary to seed plants, which contain alleles in the dominant sporophytic generation, mosses contain only a single gene locus in the dominant haploid generation. Therefore, the homeologs generated through an auto- or allopolyploidization event might represent an additional evolutionary advantage since they represent redundant gene copies (akin to alleles), encoded on haploid segregated chromosomes. In allopolyploid hybrids, gains of genes only encoded by one of the two parental genomes might even be more beneficial if they relay an important advantage that one of the parents did not encode.
In the allopolyploid seed plant cotton the majority of expression biases are thought to be due to sub- and neofunctionalization subsequent to the polyploidization event . Indeed, 60 % of the homeologs are found to be transcriptionally biased, e.g., due to cis-regulatory element divergence of the parental genomes [58, 59]. Under the conditions applied here, both BRK1 homeologs are expressed in the same tissue in P. collenchymatum and P. eurystomum, and in the case of P. collenchymatum their expression levels seem not to be heavily biased. Allopolyploid cotton has been estimated to be 1.5 MY old , while the separation of the parental lineages within the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex occurred ~11 MYA . The hybrids studied here are likely younger than that - but we might also see different patterns or speeds of homeolog divergence between mosses and seed plants in future studies.
With regard to editing site evolution, we consider a T at nad3_230 and nad4_272 to be the ancestral state, since three lineages (Funaria hygrometrica, Physcomitrella readeri and Physcomitrella magdalenae) share this characteristic, while the gain of a C in these positions can be explained by a single mutation per editing site in the lineage giving rise to Physcomitrium sphaericum and Physcomitrella patens (Figure 7). Under this scenario, editing of nad3eU230SL and nad4eU272SL in the hybrid species P. eurystomum, P. collenchymatum and P. pyriforme might have become feasible by gain (from the parental P. sphaericum lineage) of the corresponding nuclear encoded editing factor PPR_56 (Pp1s208_104V6.1, ). The gain of the editing requirement (i.e., a C instead of a T in the mitochondrial DNA) at one or both positions in the hybrid species can be explained by either maternal transmission of the organelle and thus transfer of the mutation from the P. sphaericum parental lineage, or by the independent gain of mutations (after loss of selection pressure by gain of the nuclear editing factor).
Based on synonymous substitution plots of gene duplication events, a whole-genome duplication in P. patens has been hypothesized and dated to ~45 MYA . As this is much later than the Funariidae divergence ~172 MYA , and gene family trees including F. hygrometrica and P. patens usually show clear ortholog pairs [34, 63], it is reasonable to assume that the previously shown paleopolyploidization  is a common ancestral trait of all Funariaceae. In this light, it is surprising that the F. hygrometrica haploid genome size measured here is significantly lower than that of P. patens. An explanation for this finding could be a much lower transposon or repetitive element content in F. hygrometrica, or a significantly different A/T content. In any case, fractionation (i.e., homeolog loss) apparently occurred to a large extent, since the paleopolyploidization event was not detectable by means of homeologs of BRK1 in those Funariaceae that are not hybrids.
In summary, (sympatric) speciation following allopolyploidization has apparently occurred several times within the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex.
Revised classification of Physcomitrella
Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) Bruch et Schimp., Bryol. Eur. 1: 13, 1849. Basionym: Phascum patens Hedw. Spec. Musc. 20, 1801.
Synonyms: Physcomitrium patens (Hedw.) Mitt., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, 8: 363, 1851. Physcomitrella patens ssp. californica (H.A. Crum & L.E. Anderson) B.C. Tan, J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 46: 334, 1979.
Physcomitrella readeri (Müll. Hal.) I.G. Stone & G.A.M. Scott, J. Bryol. 7: 604, 1974. Basionym: Ephemerella readeri Müll. Hal., Hedwigia 41: 120, 1902.
Synonyms: Physcomitrium readeri Müll. Hal., Gen. Musc. Frond. 112. 1900, nom. inval., lacking species description. Physcomitridium readeri (Müll. Hal.) G. Roth, Außereurop. Laubm. 250, 1911. Physcomitrella patens ssp. readeri (Müll.Hal.) B.C.Tan, J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 46: 334, 1979.
Physcomitrella magdalenae De Sloover, Bull. Jard. Nat. Belg. 45 : 131, 1975.
Synonyms: Physcomitrella patens ssp. magdalenae (De Sloover) B.C. Tan, J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 46: 334, 1979. Aphanorrhegma magdalenae (De Sloover) Ochyra, Acta Bot. Hung. 29: 178, 1983.
This taxon encompasses the African accessions of P. patens ssp. magdalenae.
Following this classification, P. patens, disjunct in North America and Europe, can be clearly distinguished from P. readeri and P. magdalenae by distinct gametophytic (but not sporophytic) morphological as well as molecular characteristics.
According to the BRK1 phylogeny and the pattern of editing sites, the stegocarpous A. serratum may also be classified as Physcomitrella, although Physcomitrella is cleistocarpous. Thus, the Funariaceae type species, F. hygrometrica, represents the most highly complex end of a morphological series, with Physcomitrella/Aphanorrhegma representing the other end. The origin of a cleistocarpous taxon from a stegocarpous taxon is found several times within the acrocarpous mosses. Species with cleistocarpous and stegocarpous members are found e.g. in the genus Pottia, where P. bryoides and P. recta are cleistocarpous while the remaining species are stegocarpous, having either no peristome, or a rudimentary or even well-developed peristome. In conclusion, as previously supposed, sporophytic characteristics cannot be used to resolve the phylogeny of the Funariaceae .
Considering an independent evolution for Physcomitrella from Physcomitrium ancestors  and the observed (phylo) genetic distances, the analyzed accessions of the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex may in consequence be classified as a single genus. In this case, Physcomitrium would be the correct genus name as it is older than Physcomitrella, dating back to 1829. Given our present taxon sampling and data set, Physcomitrella, Physcomitrium and Aphanorrhegma form a species complex that may or may not include additional genera, such as Entosthodon and Bryobeckettia. Therefore, further phylogenetic studies including more accessions and more genera are required in order to confidently propose a revision in taxonomic classification at the genus level (i.e., uniting the species of the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex into a monophyletic genus Physcomitrium).
Disjunct occurrence and long range dispersal of Physcomitrella
The habitats of the Physcomitrella accessions used in this work show clear similarities, as they grow on moist, often disturbed ground, typically in close proximity to water. Physcomitrella shows a cosmopolitan, probably originally holarctic distribution (excluding boreal and tropical regions). While one might expect genetic distances to correlate with geographic distances, the two P. patens isolates from Gemünd (Germany) cluster with one of the French Villersexel accessions, “K4” (Gemünd “K5”), and the English Cholsey accession (Gemünd “K1”) respectively; the latter Gemünd accession was characterized as var. megapolitana in the field. Also, the accessions from Villersexel (France) cluster in different parts of the P. patens genetic distance tree. These genetic distances provide evidence for either high intra-population diversity or long range dispersal.
Moss spores are able to survive in mud for prolonged periods of time, a trait considered important for ephemeral species . In particular, Physcomitrella is known to quickly appear on the muddy banks of reservoirs after draining. P. patens spores are larger and fewer in number (30 μm diameter, 8,000-16,000 per capsule) than those of F. hygrometrica (23 μm, 60,000-170,000) , making them a bigger energy reservoir that might be able to boost growth as soon as the conditions are suitable. Spores smaller than 20 μm are easily dispersed by wind  and long range dispersal via this mode is evident for Funaria hygrometrica, also considering its cosmopolitan distribution. Given the larger spore size of P. patens, along with the fact that the plants grow on wet soil and have a cleistocarpous capsule, spore dispersal by wind is possible but appears unlikely. Although long distance spore dispersal by wind cannot be excluded for Physcomitrella, we suggest that spore distribution by birds  along migration routes may also contribute to the observed disjunct distribution patterns. The disjunct distribution of P. patens on both sides of the Northern Atlantic may be explained by use of the East Atlantic flyway, while the North American continent is covered by a total of four partially overlapping flyways , potentially allowing the spores to spread across the continent. Concerning P. readeri, which is found in Japan and Australia, but also in Europe , nearly identical ribosomal spacer data between the accessions from England, Australia and Japan suggests long range dispersal. The disjunct habitats in Japan and Australia are covered by the West Pacific as well as by the East Asian-Australasian flyway used by migratory birds . Since the East Asian-Australasian flyway is geographically overlapping with the East Atlantic flyway, dispersal from Japan/Australia to Europe  is theoretically possible, although less likely than, e.g., the exchange between Japan and Australia. We hypothesize that Physcomitrella might be dispersed via migratory (water) birds along flyways since the observed habitats follow a distribution pattern coinciding with such flyways. When the SSR data are visualized as a network, potential genetic flow is also supported. While reticulate structures are present mainly within P. patens and P. readeri, there is also evidence for alleles that are potentially exchanged between both species. Interestingly, based on the SSR data no exchange is evident between P. magdalenae, P. sphaericum and any of the other accessions.
Independent secondary reduction of Funariaceae sporophyte complexity
Considering the fact that characteristic structural features of moss sporophytes can be correlated with specialized habitats , the most likely secondary reduction of the Physcomitrella sporophyte to a cleistocarpous capsule with reduced seta and increased spore size may be interpreted as an adaptation to an ephemeral life style. Given the polyphyletic origin of the three cryptic (with regard to sporophytic features) Physcomitrella species, a convergent evolutionary process in which the seta is reduced and the capsule is no longer dehiscent can be assumed. P. patens inhabits an ephemeral habitat, e.g. on banks of rivers and ponds which dry up in summer or autumn. The species has a short life cycle of up to two months from spore germination to the development of spores . Besides a reduced sporophyte, a shortened life cycle also represents a typical adaptation to a highly unpredictable and ephemeral habitat . In Physcomitrella, the gametophore is reduced as well, forming a small rosette with its apparent main function being the production of gametangia and spore capsules. As a semi-aquatic moss, the spores are most likely released into water or mud. This mode of spore dispersal does not require a lid or a peristome at the capsule, but rather the disintegration of the capsule when mature spores have developed.
The Funariaceae feature highly variable sporophyte architectures, and sporophytes of interspecies hybrids usually display intermediate or maternal phenotypes . It has been argued that evolutionary pressure may force changes to moss sporophyte architecture rather than conserving it [11, 70]. In summary, we hypothesize that probably parapatric speciation via establishing an ecological niche, namely the resting of spores in the mud, their potential dispersal by birds rather than by wind, and an ephemeral life cycle, has led to the independent evolution of a reduced sporophyte in the three Physcomitrella lineages – making them cryptic species if one considers sporophyte morphology alone.
In this study we present molecular insights into the global genetic diversity of the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex, providing evidence for sympatric speciation involving allopolyploidization, as well as for convergent evolution leading to a reduced sporophyte, large spores, and a colonization of a humid, ephemeral, moist habitat, possibly concomitant with possible parapatric speciation. Primarily, the sequenced P. patens isolate from Gransden (Europe) has to date been widely used as an experimental model in comparative plant sciences, followed by the French isolate Villersexel “K3” that has been used for the generation of a genetic map  and for crossing experiments with “Gransden” and other isolates . The present collection of axenic in vitro cultures of Funariaceae accessions, together with the molecular data presented here, is expected to boost the research into natural variation and trait evolution of this emerging model system representing haploid-dominant land plants. Resequencing of Funariaceae accessions will lead to insights into genome evolution and its coupling to trait evolution.
Availability of supporting data
The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article (and its additional files). BRK1 sequence data have been submitted to Genbank and are available under the accession numbers KC337119-KC337148.
This work is dedicated to our friend and colleague Jan-Peter Frahm who passed away unexpectedly in February 2014. He contributed much to this project by collecting plant material, providing taxonomical background and discussing species evolution among mosses.
We are grateful to all contributors (Table 1/Additional file 2: Table S1) for their help on collecting and determining Funariaceae and to T. Tiko for technical assistance. We would like to thank B. Goffinet for helpful comments on this work.
This work was supported by the University of Freiburg, the Ministry of Science, Research and Art of the Federal State of Baden-Württemberg (RiSC grant to SAR) and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Freiburg Initiative for Systems Biology, 0313921 to SAR).
- Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer AD, Terry A, Salamov A, Shapiro H, Nishiyama T, Perroud PF, Lindquist EA, Kamisugi Y, Tanahashi T, Sakakibara K, Fujita T, Oishi K, Shin-I T, Kuroki Y, Toyoda A, Suzuki Y, Hashimoto S, Yamaguchi K, Sugano S, Kohara Y, Fujiyama A, Anterola A, Aoki S, Ashton N, Barbazuk WB, Barker E, Bennetzen JL, Blankenship R, et al: The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science. 2008, 319 (5859): 64-69. 10.1126/science.1150646.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zimmer AD, Lang D, Buchta K, Rombauts S, Nishiyama T, Hasebe M, Van de Peer Y, Rensing SA, Reski R: Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions. BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 498-10.1186/1471-2164-14-498.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sugiura C, Kobayashi Y, Aoki S, Sugita C, Sugita M: Complete chloroplast DNA sequence of the moss Physcomitrella patens: evidence for the loss and relocation of rpoA from the chloroplast to the nucleus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (18): 5324-5331. 10.1093/nar/gkg726.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terasawa K, Odahara M, Kabeya Y, Kikugawa T, Sekine Y, Fujiwara M, Sato N: The mitochondrial genome of the moss Physcomitrella patens sheds new light on mitochondrial evolution in land plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (3): 699-709.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan BC: A new classification for the genus Physcomitrella B.S.G. J Hattori Bot Lab. 1979, 46: 327-336.Google Scholar
- Wijk R: Index Muscorum. 1959, Utrecht, NL: Regnum Vegetabile, 1959-1969.Google Scholar
- Tan BC: Physcomitrella patens (Musci: Funariaceae) in North America. The Bryologist. 1978, 81 (4): 561-567. 10.2307/3242342.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ochi H: A revision of the family Funariaceae (Musci) in Japan and the adjacent regions. Jap J Bot. 1968, 20: 1-34.Google Scholar
- Mueller F: Neue und bemerkenswerte Moosfunde aus Zaire. Trop Bryology. 1995, 10: 81-90.Google Scholar
- Sloover JL: Note de bryologie africaine III. - Physcomitrella magdalenae sp. nov. Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique/Bulletin van de National Plantentuin van België. 1975, 45 (1/2): 131-135. 10.2307/3667591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Budke JM, Goffinet B: Phylogenetic inference rejects sporophyte based classification of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta): rapid radiation suggests rampant homoplasy in sporophyte evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012, 62 (1): 130-145. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDaniel SF, von Stackelberg M, Richardt S, Quatrano RS, Reski R, Rensing SA: The speciation history of the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex. Evolution. 2010, 64 (1): 217-231. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00797.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perroud PF, Quatrano RS: BRICK1 is required for apical cell growth in filaments of the moss Physcomitrella patens but not for gametophore morphology. Plant Cell. 2008, 20 (2): 411-422. 10.1105/tpc.107.053256.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engel PP: The induction of biochemical and morphological mutants in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Am J Bot. 1968, 55 (4): 438-446. 10.2307/2440573.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reski R, Faust M, Wang XH, Wehe M, Abel WO: Genome analysis of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) B.S.G. Mol Gen Genet. 1994, 244 (4): 352-359.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beike AK, Rensing SA: The Physcomitrella patens genome – a first stepping stone towards understanding bryophyte and land plant evolution. Trop Bryology. 2010, 31: 43-49.Google Scholar
- Frahm J-P: Biologie der Moose. 2001, Heidelberg, Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Fritsch R: Index To Bryophyte Chromosome Counts, vol. 40. 1991, Berlin, Stuttgart: J. Cramer/Gebrueder BorntraegerGoogle Scholar
- Crow KD, Wagner GP: Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators’ Workshop 2005. What is the role of genome duplication in the evolution of complexity and diversity?. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23 (5): 887-892. 10.1093/molbev/msj083.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohno S: Evolution by gene duplication. 1970, New York: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soltis PS, Soltis DE: The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009, 60: 561-588. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A: The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10 (10): 725-732. 10.1038/nrg2600.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rensing SA, Ick J, Fawcett JA, Lang D, Zimmer A, Van de Peer Y, Reski R: An ancient genome duplication contributed to the abundance of metabolic genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7 (1): 130-10.1186/1471-2148-7-130.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wettstein F: Gattungskreuzungen bei Moosen. Z Indukt Abstammungs-Vererbungsl. 1924, 33: 253-257.Google Scholar
- Wettstein F: Genetik. Manual of Bryology. Edited by: Verdoorn F. 1932, Hague: The Netherlands: (ed. F. Verdoorn). Martinus Niehoff, 233-272.Google Scholar
- Natcheva R, Cronberg N: What do we know about hybridization among bryophytes in nature?. Can J Bot. 2004, 82: 1687-1704. 10.1139/b04-139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rensing SA, Beike AK, Lang D, Greilhuber J, Wendel JF, Leitch IJ, Doležel J: Evolutionary importance of generative polyploidy for genome evolution of haploid-dominant land plants. Plant Genome Diversity. vol. in press. Vienna, New York: Springer; 2012Google Scholar
- Andrews AL: A new hybrid in Physcomitrium. Torreya. 1918, 18: 52-54.Google Scholar
- Andrews AL: Taxonomic notes. II. Another natural hybrid in the Funariaceae. The Bryologist. 1942, 45 (6): 176-178. 10.1639/0007-2745(1942)45[176:TNIANH]2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Britton EG: Contributions to American Bryology IX. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 1895, 22 (2): 62-68. 10.2307/2478381.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pettet A: Hybrid sporophytes in Funariaceae. I. Hybrid sporophytes on Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) B. & S., and Physcomitrium sphaericum (Schkuhr) Brid. in Britain. Trans Br Bryol Soc. 1964, 4: 642-648. 10.1179/006813864804812164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rüdinger M, Funk HT, Rensing SA, Maier UG, Knoop V: RNA editing: only eleven sites are present in the Physcomitrella patens mitochondrial transcriptome and a universal nomenclature proposal. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009, 24: 24-Google Scholar
- Miyata Y, Sugiura C, Kobayashi Y, Hagiwara M, Sugita M: Chloroplast ribosomal S14 protein transcript is edited to create a translation initiation codon in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002, 1576 (3): 346-349. 10.1016/S0167-4781(02)00346-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rüdinger M, Szovenyi P, Rensing SA, Knoop V: Assigning DYW-type PPR proteins to RNA editing sites in the funariid mosses Physcomitrella patens and Funaria hygrometrica. Plant J. 2011, 67 (2): 370-380. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04600.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beike AK, Horst NA, Rensing SA: Axenic bryophyte in vitro cultivation. Endocyt Cell Res. 2010, 20: 102-108.Google Scholar
- Steeves TA, Sussex IM CRP: In vitro studies in abnormal growth of prothalli of the brachen fern. Am J Bot. 1955, 42: 232-245. 10.2307/2438559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reski R, Abel WO: Induction of budding on chloronemata and caulonemata of the moss, Physcomitrella patens, using isopentenyladenine. Planta. 1985, 165 (3): 354-358. 10.1007/BF00392232.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990, 12: 13-15.Google Scholar
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 113-10.1186/1471-2105-5-113.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clamp M, Cuff J, Searle SM, Barton GJ: The Jalview Java alignment editor. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20 (3): 426-427. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg430.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frickenhaus S, Beszteri B: Quicktree-SD. 2008Google Scholar
- Howe K, Bateman A, Durbin R: QuickTree: building huge Neighbour-Joining trees of protein sequences. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18 (11): 1546-1547. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1546.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19 (12): 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A: TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18 (3): 502-504. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.502.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C: A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19 (6): 1349-10.1093/nar/19.6.1349.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28 (10): 2731-2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lenz H, Knoop V: PREPACT 2.0: Predicting C-to-U and U-to-C RNA Editing in Organelle Genome Sequences with Multiple References and Curated RNA Editing Annotation. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2013, 7: 1-19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Stackelberg M, Rensing SA, Reski R: Identification of genic moss SSR markers and a comparative analysis of twenty-four algal and plant gene indices reveal species-specific rather than group-specific characteristics of microsatellites. BMC Plant Biol. 2006, 6: 9-10.1186/1471-2229-6-9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y: Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. J Mol Evol. 1983, 19 (2): 153-170. 10.1007/BF02300753.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4 (4): 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langella O: Populations 1.2.28. Population Genetic Software (Individuals or Populations Distances, Phylogenetic Trees). available at http://www.bioinformatics.org/downloads/index.php?file_id=538. 2002
- Huson DH, Bryant D: Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23 (2): 254-267.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schween G, Gorr G, Hohe A, Reski R: Unique tissue-specific cell cycle in Physcomitrella. Plant Biol. 2003, 5 (1): 50-58. 10.1055/s-2003-37984.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perroud PF, Cove DJ, Quatrano RS, McDaniel SF: An experimental method to facilitate the identification of hybrid sporophytes in the moss Physcomitrella patens using fluorescent tagged lines. New Phytol. 2011, 2 (10): 1469-8137.Google Scholar
- Ungerer MC, Strakosh SC, Zhen Y: Genome expansion in three hybrid sunflower species is associated with retrotransposon proliferation. Curr Biol. 2006, 16 (20): R872-R873. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M, Conery JS: The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000, 290: 1151-1155. 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flagel L, Udall J, Nettleton D, Wendel J: Duplicate gene expression in allopolyploid Gossypium reveals two temporally distinct phases of expression evolution. BMC Biol. 2008, 6: 16-10.1186/1741-7007-6-16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaudhary B, Flagel L, Stupar RM, Udall JA, Verma N, Springer NM, Wendel JF: Reciprocal silencing, transcriptional bias and functional divergence of homeologs in polyploid cotton (gossypium). Genetics. 2009, 182 (2): 503-517. 10.1534/genetics.109.102608.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flagel LE, Wendel JF: Evolutionary rate variation, genomic dominance and duplicate gene expression evolution during allotetraploid cotton speciation. New Phytol. 2010, 186 (1): 184-193. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03107.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Senchina DS, Alvarez I, Cronn RC, Liu B, Rong J, Noyes RD, Paterson AH, Wing RA, Wilkins TA, Wendel JF: Rate variation among nuclear genes and the age of polyploidy in Gossypium. Mol Biol Evol. 2003, 20 (4): 633-643. 10.1093/molbev/msg065.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohtani S, Ichinose M, Tasaki E, Aoki Y, Komura Y, Sugita M: Targeted gene disruption identifies three PPR-DYW proteins involved in RNA editing for five editing sites of the moss mitochondrial transcripts. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51 (11): 1942-1949. 10.1093/pcp/pcq142.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Newton AE, Wikström N, Bell N, Forrest LL, Ignatov MS: Dating TheDiversification Of The Pleurocarpous Mosses. In Pleurocarpous mosses: Systematics and Evolution,vol. Special Volume 71 Edited by: Tangney N. Boca Raton: Systematics Association: CRC Press; 2006Google Scholar
- Zobell O, Faigl W, Saedler H, Munster T: MIKC* MADS-box proteins: conserved regulators of the gametophytic generation of land plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27 (5): 1201-1211. 10.1093/molbev/msq005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glime JM: Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1 Physiological Ecology. Edited by: Glime JM. 2007, vol. 1: Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of BryologistsGoogle Scholar
- Nakosteen PC, Hughes KW: Sexual life cycle of three species of Funariaceae in culture. Bryologist. 1978, 81: 307-314. 10.2307/3242191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDaniel SF, Shaw AJ: Selective sweeps and intercontinental migration in the cosmopolitan moss Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14: 1121-1132. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02484.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewis LR, Behling E, Gousse H, Qian E, Elphick CS, Lamarre JF, Bety J, Liebezeit J, Rozzi R, Goffinet B: First evidence of bryophyte diaspores in the plumage of transequatorial migrant birds. PeerJ. 2014, 2: e424-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boere GC, Stroud DA: The Flyway Concept: What It Is And What It Isn’t. 2006, Edinburgh, UK: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Hooper EJ, Duckett JG, Cuming AC, Kunin WE, Pressel S: Ephemerella readeri Müll. Hal. (Physcomitrella readeri (Müll. Hal.) I.G. Stone & G.A.M. Scott, Funariidae, Bryophyta): a genus and species new to Europe. J Bryol. 2010, 32: 256-264. 10.1179/037366810X12814321877589.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vitt DH: Adaptive Modes of the Moss Sporophyte. The Bryologist. 1981, 84 (2): 166-186. 10.2307/3242820.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamisugi Y, von Stackelberg M, Lang D, Care M, Reski R, Rensing SA, Cuming AC: A sequence-anchored genetic linkage map for the moss, Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2008, 56 (5): 855-866. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03637.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.