Evolutionary relationships of the Critically Endangered frog Ericabatrachus baleensisLargen, 1991 with notes on incorporating previously unsampled taxa into large-scale phylogenetic analyses

Table 2 Hypothesis-testing results

Rank	Item	AU test
1	present work, Bayesian GTR Tree	0.853
2	present work, ML Tree	0.262
Hypotheses with AU test values lower than 0.05 are rejected
3	Dubois [8] hypothesis	0.008
4	Pyron and Wiens [10] hypothesis	1.00E-05
5	Frost et al. [10] hypothesis	1.00E-05
6	Scott [10] hypothesis	4.00E-08

Values shown for the Approximately Unbiased test (AU test) from CONSEL [35] tested with the 66-taxon data set (explained in detail in the Methods section). Dotted line separates the non-rejected hypotheses (above) from the rejected hypotheses (below).

ISSN: 2730-7182