Skip to main content

Table 3 Fertility parameter estimates

From: Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population

Genotyping error

 

Parameter estimates

LRT

Phenotypical trait

f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 1 [CI]

f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 2 [CI]

f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 3 [CI]

f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 4 [CI]

f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 5 [CI]

d.f.

K

P-value

Without

Flowering intensity

0.06 [0.01–1.11]

0.34 [0.04–3.26]

0.91 [0.10–8.02]

0.63 [0.06–6.23]

1.00

4

12.6

< 0.05

 

DBH

0

0.21 [0.04–1.02]

0.68 [0.20–2.30]

1.31 [0.44–3.90]

1.00

3

24.2

< 10-3

 

Fruiting intensity

0.47 [0.03–8.27]

0.57 [0.05–6.19]

0.30 [0.03–3.02]

0.35 [0.03–3.47]

1.00

4

2.6

0.64

 

Gall attacks

1.00

1.56 [0.32–7.65]

1.71 [0.52–5.61]

0.41 [0.07–2.21]

0

3

5.0

0.18

 

Sexual type

0

1.00

0.97 [0.13–7.32]

1.14 [0.16–8.33]

-

2

1.4

0.51

Low

Flowering intensity

0.27 [0.07–1.02]

0.53 [0.19–1.48]

0.92 [0.35–2.43]

1.72 [0.66–4.51]

1.00

4

16.0

< 0.01

 

DBH

0

0.28 [0.10–0.78]

0.62 [0.24–1.58]

1.39 [0.61–3.14]

1.00

3

34.4

< 10-5

 

Fruiting intensity

0.10 [0.02–0.39]

0.31 [0.12–0.85]

0.16 [0.05–0.48]

0.22 [0.08–0.58]

1.00

4

9.2

0.06

 

Gall attacks

1.00

2.21 [0.80–6.15]

2.48 [1.13–5.45]

0.90 [0.29–2.76]

0

3

8.2

< 0.05

 

Sexual type

12.01 [1.12–128.30]

1.00

1.14 [0.31–4.20]

0.84 [0.24–2.97]

-

3

2.2

0.54

High

Flowering intensity

0.18 [0.04–0.79]

0.35 [0.10–1.27]

0.84 [0.26–2.78]

1.67 [0.50–5.63]

1.00

4

35.2

< 10-5

 

DBH

0.03 [0.01–0.28]

0.34 [0.15–0.79]

0.84 [0.41–1.75]

1.24 [0.62–2.50]

1.00

4

44.0

< 10-5

 

Fruiting intensity

0.28 [0.05–1.54]

0.71 [0.20–2.47]

0.37 [0.11–1.26]

0.49 [0.15–1.62]

1.00

4

7.8

0.10

 

Gall attacks

1.00

2.16 [0.76–6.18]

1.71 [0.85–3.47]

1.50 [0.71–3.17]

0.60 [0.07–5.22]

4

4.0

0.43

 

Sexual type

12.38 [0.82–186.18]

1.00

1.61 [0.21–12.64]

1.34 [0.17–10.39]

-

3

5.4

0.15

  1. Fertility parameters relative to phenotypic traits and gall attacks (f) estimated under complete model (Equation 4) with Exp. Power kernel. The effect of each factor was tested by removing the factor and comparing to the complete model with all factors by a LRT. Indices indicate different levels of each factor (Flowering and Fruiting intensities: 1 = Anecdotal, 2 = Low, 3 = Intermediate, 4 = Abundant, 5 = Massive; DBH: 1 = < 40 cm, 2 = < 80 cm, 3 = < 120 cm, 4 = < 160 cm, 5 = > 200 cm; Gall attacks: 1 = Inexistent, 2 = Low, 3 = Intermediate, 4 = High, 5 = Massive; Sexual type: 1 = Pure males (MM), 2 = Hermaphrodites with a high proportion of male flowers (MH), 3 = Hermaphrodites with a low proportion of male flowers (HM), 4 = Pure hermaphrodites (HH).
Back to article page

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us