Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Z-scores of the robustness γ 1 m MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaacciGae83SdC2aa0baaSqaaiabigdaXaqaaiabd2gaTbaaaaa@3001@ at threshold level T1. Rates for each real pre-miRNA compared to 1,000 random and four types of shuffled sequences.

From: In silico genetic robustness analysis of microRNA secondary structures: potential evidence of congruent evolution in microRNA

Species Random Zero-markov Mononucleotide First-markov Dinucleotide
H. sapiens -2.39 ± 0.64 -2.42 ± 0.63 -2.42 ± 0.63 -2.45 ± 0.63 -2.44 ± 0.64
C. elegans -2.50 ± 0.92 -2.48 ± 0.89 -2.47 ± 0.89 -2.52 ± 0.90 -2.49 ± 0.89
D. melanogaster -2.44 ± 0.75 -2.39 ± 0.74 -2.39 ± 0.74 -2.43 ± 0.74 -2.40 ± 0.73
D. rerio -2.39 ± 0.59 -2.40 ± 0.58 -2.40 ± 0.57 -2.44 ± 0.57 -2.41 ± 0.57
M. musculus -2.23 ± 0.79 -2.25 ± 0.77 -2.26 ± 0.77 -2.29 ± 0.77 -2.27 ± 0.76
R. norvegicus -2.32 ± 0.78 -2.37 ± 0.75 -2.37 ± 0.76 -2.40 ± 0.76 -2.37 ± 0.75
Average -2.37 ± 0.71 -2.38 ± 0.69 -2.38 ± 0.69 -2.42 ± 0.70 -2.40 ± 0.69