Genetic structuring and migration patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus(Lowe, 1839)

Gonzalez, Elena G; Beerli, Peter; Zardoya, Rafael

doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-252

BMC Ecology and Evolution

Table 1 Summary statistics for nine microsatellite loci of Atlantic bigeye tuna populations *

From: Genetic structuring and migration patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus(Lowe, 1839)

		Locus
Population		TA102	TA113	TA117	TA121	TA161	TA208	TTH4	TTH208	TTH217	Mean all population
Guinea	N	45	48	47	46	48	47	48	47	45	46.8
	N _A	23	31	26	14	21	15	24	20	9	20.3
	N _S	17.21	21.55	20.21	12.02	15.86	10.95	18.52	16.03	7.30	15.52
	H _E	0.929	0.952	0.951	0.900	0.929	0.852	0.944	0.925	0.738	0.902
	Ho	0.800	0.896	0.872	0.910	0.813	0.894	0.917	0.830	0.711	0.849
	F _IS	0.140	0.060	0.083	0.093	0.127	-0.049	0.029	0.103	0.037	0.071
Guinea2	N	47	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	49	49.5
	N _A	23	27	24	16	14	13	26	19	8	18.9
	N _S	15.62	20.40	19.37	13.15	14.79	10.47	18.67	15.36	6.89	14.97
	H _E	0.912	0.957	0.950	0.899	0.929	0.876	0.942	0.932	0.750	0.905
	Ho	0.766	0.900	0.820	0.908	0.980	0.880	0.860	0.780	0.633	0.836
	F _IS	0.162	0.061	0.138	-0.014	-0.056	-0.004	0.087	0.165	0.158	0.076
Azores	N	49	50	50	50	50	50	47	49	49	49.3
	N _A	21	30	25	15	20	16	21	21	10	19.9
	N _S	16.09	21.58	18.65	12.82	15.62	11.33	17.44	16.66	7.85	15.34
	H _E	0.924	0.960	0.949	0.906	0.929	0.866	0.946	0.925	0.776	0.909
	Ho	0.755	0.900	1.000	0.915	0.800	0.820	0.830	0.816	0.755	0.843
	F _IS	0.184	0.063	-0.054	0.082	0.140	0.054	0.124	0.118	0.028	0.082
Canary	N	32	33	33	33	33	32	29	33	33	32.3
	N _A	21	30	20	17	18	14	24	17	6	18.5
	N _S	18.27	23.65	17.24	14.53	15.39	12.00	19.91	15.25	5.51	15.75
	H _E	0.948	0.964	0.943	0.905	0.931	0.878	0.915	0.921	0.668	0.897
	Ho	0.875	0.879	0.939	0.919	0.909	0.906	0.862	0.818	0.636	0.860
	F _IS	0.078	0.090	0.004	0.145	0.023	-0.033	0.059	0.113	0.048	0.060
Canary2	N	31	32	32	32	31	31	28	31	31	31
	N _A	20	27	24	16	16	13	22	20	9	18.5
	N _S	17.46	23.00	20.39	14.10	14.31	11.79	19.56	16.61	7.89	16.12
	H _E	0.936	0.967	0.952	0.884	0.916	0.887	0.955	0.924	0.753	0.908
	Ho	0.710	0.875	0.969	0.898	0.871	0.807	0.750	0.839	0.645	0.818
	F _IS	0.245	0.096	-0.017	0.132	0.050	0.093	0.217	0.094	0.145	0.115
Canada	N	40	40	40	40	40	40	40	40	40	40
	N _A	19	31	22	17	18	13	26	19	9	19.3
	N _S	15.40	23.44	18.31	13.97	15.21	10.56	19.72	15.63	7.25	15.5
	H _E	0.917	0.963	0.936	0.900	0.914	0.867	0.949	0.930	0.773	0.905
	Ho	0.775	0.925	0.975	0.912	0.900	0.850	0.875	0.725	0.625	0.840
	F _IS	0.156	0.040	-0.042	0.068	0.016	0.020	0.079	0.222	0.193	0.082
Canada2	N	23	23	23	23	23	23	21	23	23	22.8
	N _A	20	21	17	14	14	12	17	16	8	15.4
	N _S	19.02	20.10	16.36	13.47	13.55	11.56	17.00	15.30	7.82	14.91
	H _E	0.934	0.940	0.896	0.854	0.901	0.885	0.940	0.905	0.825	0.898
	Ho	0.696	0.913	0.739	0.873	0.826	0.913	0.810	0.870	0.826	0.829
	F _IS	0.260	0.029	0.178	-0.046	0.085	-0.032	0.141	0.040	-0.001	0.074
Indian	N	44	46	46	46	46	46	46	46	46	45.8
	N _A	20	29	21	17	21	16	25	22	8	19.9
	N _S	16.13	21.87	17.44	13.85	17.11	12.61	18.82	16.78	6.30	15.66
	H _E	0.932	0.961	0.940	0.904	0.940	0.843	0.949	0.925	0.701	0.899
	Ho	0.955	0.935	0.870	0.914	0.804	0.783	0.935	0.587	0.609	0.821
	F _IS	-0.024	0.027	0.076	0.001	0.146	0.072	0.015	0.368	0.133	0.090
Pacific	N	39	49	49	49	49	49	46	47	49	47.3
	N _A	18	30	23	18	20	16	25	20	11	20.1
	N _S	14.45	21.01	17.05	14.25	16.40	10.22	19.29	15.51	7.67	15.09
	H _E	0.902	0.956	0.936	0.914	0.942	0.773	0.950	0.925	0.711	0.890
	Ho	0.843	0.898	0.939	0.923	0.939	0.714	0.848	0.702	0.633	0.826
	F _IS	0.063	0.061	-0.003	-0.039	0.003	0.077	0.108	0.243	0.111	0.067
Mean all loci	N	38.9	41.22	41.1	41	41.1	40.9	39.4	40.7	40.5	40.5
	N _A	20.5	28.4	22.4	16	18	14.2	23.3	19.3	8.7	19
	N _S	16.63	21.84	18.33	13.57	15.36	11.28	18.77	15.90	7.16	15.43
	H _E	0.926	0.958	0.939	0.896	0.926	0.858	0.943	0.923	0.744	0.901
	Ho	0.797	0.902	0.902	0.908	0.871	0.841	0.854	0.774	0.675	0.742
	F _IS	0.133	0.058	0.045	0.045	0.060	0.024	0.088	0.174	0.098	0.080

* N = sample size, N_A= number of alleles per locus, N_S= number of alleles per locus standarized to the smallest sample size (23), expected (H_E) and observed (Ho) heterozygosities, F_IS= Wright's statistics. Bold F_ISvalues are significant probability estimates after Bonferroni correction [83]

Back to article page

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com