From: Parasite-mediated disruptive selection in a natural Daphnia population
Type of selection | Model | Pre-epidemic | Post-epidemic | Post-sex | n | AIC | evidence ratio | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No selection | 1) unimodal: null | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{A} σ _{A} | 2 | -45.29 | 2145 | |||
2) bimodal: null | μ _{1A} σ _{A} | μ _{2A} σ _{A} | μ _{1A} σ _{A} | μ _{2A} σ _{A} | μ _{1A} σ _{A} | μ _{2A} σ _{A} | 3 | -51.61 | 90.8 | |
Directional selection | 3*) unimodal: mean, var differ | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{B} σ _{B} | μ _{C} σ _{C} | 6 | -44.74 | 2817 | |||
4) unimodal: pre-epidemic differs | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{B} σ _{B} | μ _{B} σ _{B} | 4 | -47.99 | 557 | ||||
5*) bimodal: all modes differ | μ _{1A} σ _{A} | μ _{2A} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{A} | μ _{2B} σ _{A} | μ _{1C} σ _{A} | μ _{2C} σ _{A} | 7 | -56.96 | 6.27 | |
6) bimodal: pre-epidemic differs | μ _{1A} σ _{A} | μ _{2A} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{A} | μ _{2B} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{A} | μ _{2B} σ _{A} | 5 | -60.55 | 1.04 | |
Disruptive selection | 7) mixed: uni-bi.-bi., same modes | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{A} | μ _{2B} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{A} | μ _{2B} σ _{A} | 4 | -60.63 | 1 | |
8*) mixed: uni.-bi.-bi., modes differ | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{A} | μ _{2B} σ _{A} | μ _{1C} σ _{A} | μ _{2C} σ _{A} | 6 | -56.86 | 6.58 | ||
9*) mixed: uni.-bi.-uni. | μ _{A} σ _{A} | μ _{1B} σ _{B} | μ _{2B} σ _{B} | μ _{C} σ _{C} | 7 | -52.02 | 74 |