Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of experiment II in which a calf was infested with crosses of adult ticks of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus strains from Australia (AUS), Argentina (ARG) and Mozambique (MOZ).

From: Allopatric speciation in ticks: genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Cross+

(male × female)

Engorged female weight (mg)*

Feeding period (days)* #

No. engorged females that oviposited (%)

Egg mass weight (mg)*

EPE*

% egg hatching*

F1fertility@

MOZ × MOZ

252.3 ± 81.1

a

7.6 ± 0.6

a, f

21 (96.1)

123.2. ± 60.0

a, c

47.1 ± 15.5 a, c, d, e

85.5 ± 30.4 a

Yes

ARG × ARG

257.4 ± 65.6

a

6.5 ± 0.8

b

19 (95.0)

131.9 ± 29.6

a

51.2 ± 5.7 a, c

85.3 ± 28.3 a

Yes

AUS × AUS

116.1 ± 36.3

b

7.4 ± 1.5

a, b, d

14 (100)

39.9 ± 17.9

b

33.4 ± 7.4 b

20.9 ± 28.0 b

Yes

MOZ × ARG

230.5 ± 58.2

a

8.1 ± 0.7

c, d, f

11 (91.7)

122.5 ± 36.2

a, c

50.2 ± 7.5 c, d

85.0 ± 31.7 a

Yes

MOZ × AUS

100.4 ± 32.4

b

8.8 ± 1.6

c

15 (83.3)

43.3 ± 18.3

b

39.9 ± 6.9 e

0.0 ± 0.0

**

ARG × MOZ

236.9 ± 58.9

a

9.2 ± 1.8

c, e

18 (100)

122.6 ± 38.2

a, c

51.0 ± 5.4 c

84.7 ± 33.3 a

Yes

ARG × AUS

117.8 ± 31.4

b

8.4 ± 1.1

c, d

10 (90.9)

55.6 ± 19.1

b

45.7 ± 6.6 d

0.0 ± 0.0

**

AUS × MOZ

226.2. ± 51.3

a

8.0 ± 1.3

c, f

24 (100)

103.9 ± 12.4

c

46.5 ± 12.4 c, d

53.6 ± 40.4 c

No

AUS × ARG

233.0 ± 56.6

a

7.0 ± 1.6

a, b

15 (83.3)

114.4 ± 30.0

a.c

47.5 ± 30.0 c, d

15.6 ± 21.5 b

No

___ × MOZ

96.0 ± 71.0

b, c

15.9 ± 3.2

g

11 (57.9)

61.4 ± 32.7

b

40.8 ± 13.9 b, d, e

0.0 ± 0.0

**

___ × ARG

66.2 ± 44.0

c, d

14.5 ± 3.3

g, h

8 (61.5)

21.1 ± 17.5

d

22.4 ± 9.9 f

0.0 ± 0.0

**

___ × AUS

52.9 ± 19.1

d

12.6 ± 1.2

h

7 (70)

8.3 ± 3.4

d

13.0 ± 4.7 g

0.0 ± 0.0

**

  1. +Each cross represented one independent infestation sleeve glued to the host dorsum.
  2. * Values presented as mean ± standard deviation.
  3. # Feeding period refers to days elapsed from adult infestation to detachment of engorged females.
  4. EPE: egg production efficiency (weight of egg mass/weight of the engorged female × 100).
  5. @ Larvae generated from each cross were infested in a separate sleeve on a calf; fertility of the resulting engorged females was evaluated (see Table 4).
  6. ** Cross produced no F1 larvae to perform an infestation.
  7. Values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).