Skip to main content

Table 3 Analysis of functional divergence between OPR subfamilies in plants

From: Phylogenetic analysis, structural evolution and functional divergence of the 12-oxo-phytodienoate acid reductase gene family in plants

Comparison

θ1 ± S.Ea

P b

Qk>0.70c

Critical amino acid sitesd

Sub. I vs II

0.220 ± 0.056

<0.01

7

35*, 65, 70*, 110, 258*, 306, 324*

Sub. I vs III

0.280 ± 0.055

<0.01

11

41*, 54, 69*, 80, 104, 243*, 258*, 312, 324*, 330*, 360

Sub. I vs IV

0.176 ± 0.070

<0.01

1

212

Sub. I vs V

0.351 ± 0.083

<0.01

7

62*, 98, 166, 212, 227*, 254*, 264

Sub. I vs VI

0.229 ± 0.063

<0.01

5

47, 110, 157*, 212, 307*

Sub. I vs VII

0.377 ± 0.077

<0.01

16

38, 43, 56*, 62*, 68, 85, 163*, 178, 207*, 227*, 245, 257,258*, 327*, 331, 332

Sub. II vs III

0.340 ± 0.064

<0.01

14

41*, 65, 69*, 70*, 80, 85, 167, 169, 194, 201, 243*, 306, 308, 309

Sub. II vs IV

0.001 ± 0.022

>0.05

0

Not found

Sub. II vs V

0.142 ± 0.133

>0.05

0

Not found

Sub. II vs VI

0.269 ± 0.064

<0.01

10

38, 65, 157*, 191, 223, 245, 248*, 307*, 308, 324*

Sub. II vs VII

0.114 ± 0.083

<0.05

0

Not found

Sub. III vs IV

0.350 ± 0.086

<0.01

8

21, 40*, 83*, 187, 254*, 307*, 308, 309

Sub. III vs V

0.437 ± 0.084

<0.01

 

16 *62, 66, 70*, 82, 104, 158*, 176, 243*, 254*, 255, 258*, 264, 273, 275, 318, 330*

Sub. III vs VI

0.353 ± 0.068

<0.01

13

21, 70*, 87, 158*, 243*, 248*, 255, 259, 309, 312, 314*, 318, 324*

Sub. III vs VII

0.378 ± 0.081

<0.01

12

56*, 62*, 68, 69*, 85, 189, 205*, 228*, 233, 245, 324*, 330*

Sub. IV vs V

0.288 ± 0.155

<0.05

0

Not found

Sub. IV vs VI

0.351 ± 0.083

<0.01

9

47, 157*, 189, 223, 248*, 254*, 265, 307*, 308

Sub. IV vs VII

0.259 ± 0.153

<0.05

0

Not found

Sub. V vs VI

0.159 ± 0.105

>0.05

0

Not found

Sub. V vs VII

0.316 ± 0.162

<0.05

2

264, 332

Sub. VI vs VII

0.178 ± 0.072

<0.01

1

245

  1. a θ is the coefficient of functional divergence; θ1 ± S.E. is the coefficient of type I functional divergence between two clusters and its standard error.
  2. b The significance level (P value) is computed using Fisher's transformation.
  3. c Qk, posterior probability. A site-specific profile based on the posterior probability (Qk) was used to identify critical amino acid residues that were responsible for functional divergence.
  4. d Numbering of amino acid residues corresponds to AtOPR02-1. Critical amino acid sites with the highest posterior values (Qk>0.70) are shown.
  5. * The amino acid residues depicted with an asterisk were also found to be predicted in positive-selection sites between OPR paralogues (see Table 2).