Impact of duplicate gene copies on phylogenetic analysis and divergence time estimates in butterflies

Table 2 Partitioned Bremer support values for nodes shown in Figure 1.

Node	Node name	UV	B	LW	EF-1α	COI	Total
1	Papilio	69	39/43	49/72	12	12	181/208
2	Colias + Pieris	45/26	36/26	19/37	13/7	8	123/104
3	Agriades + Polyommatus	47	60/74	63/58	57	15	242/251
4	L. helloides + L. nivalis	13	11/9	7	0	4	35/33
5	(L. helloides + L. nivalis) L. heteronea	14	4/6	11	7/6	1/2	37/39
6	((L. helloides + L. nivalis) L. heteronea) L. rubidus	32	43/31	55/49	12/13	-9/-10	133/115
7	Lycaeninae + Satyrium	6	3/11	15/20	-2/-1	-11/-12	11/24
8	(Lycaeninae + Satyrium)(Agriades + Polyommatus)	17	35/40	37/30	3	6	98/96
9	Lycaenidae + Apodemia	-20	14/7	20/22	7	-6	15/10
10	Danaus	60/67	63/75	83/62	36/28	14/24	256
11	Neominois + Oeneis	24/23	0	36/34	27/28.5	8/6.5	95/92
12	(N. ridingsii + O. chryxus) C. tullia	2	0	12/6	6	-2	18/12
13	((N. ridingsii + O. chryxus) C. tullia) Bicyclus	22	12/10	8/10	4	7	53
14	Heliconius	22	19	13	12	-5	61
15	Heliconius +Agraulis	28	16	21	3	4	72
16	(Heliconius + Agraulis) Speyeria	12	10	12/13	10	-1	43/44
17	Limenitis	48	67/68	46/47	44	29	234/236
18	Limenitis + node 16	9	15/17	10/7	6	3	43/42
19	Vanessa + Nymphalis	20/16	23/27	23/27	14/17	4/-1	84/86
20	(Vanessa + Nymphalis) Euphydryas	9.5	23	13/14	6.5	8	60/61
21	Node 18 + Node 20	12	1/4	7/1	2	-1	21/18
22	Node 21 + Node 13	-4	8/11	8/9	4	-1	15/19
23	Node 22 + Node 10	2/-4	2/3	4/5	0/4	1/-1	9/7
24	Node 23 + Node 9	-20/-4	14/3	20/5	7/4	-6/-1	15/7
25	Node 24 + Node 2	4	0/-2	8/5	0	6	18/13
26	Node 25 + Node 1	18/13	14/9	35/9	0/6	-2/2	65/39
	Total	491.5/479.5	532/540	635/594	290.5/289	88/95.5	2037/1998
	Percentage	24	26/27	31/29.7	14/14.5	4.3/4.8	100

Values represent support as calculated using data sets containing slower/faster evolving gene copies. Only one number is displayed when both analyses rendered the same value.

ISSN: 2730-7182