Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Partitioned Bremer support values for nodes shown in Figure 1.

From: Impact of duplicate gene copies on phylogenetic analysis and divergence time estimates in butterflies

Node Node name UV B LW EF-1α COI Total
1 Papilio 69 39/43 49/72 12 12 181/208
2 Colias + Pieris 45/26 36/26 19/37 13/7 8 123/104
3 Agriades + Polyommatus 47 60/74 63/58 57 15 242/251
4 L. helloides + L. nivalis 13 11/9 7 0 4 35/33
5 (L. helloides + L. nivalis) L. heteronea 14 4/6 11 7/6 1/2 37/39
6 ((L. helloides + L. nivalis) L. heteronea) L. rubidus 32 43/31 55/49 12/13 -9/-10 133/115
7 Lycaeninae + Satyrium 6 3/11 15/20 -2/-1 -11/-12 11/24
8 (Lycaeninae + Satyrium)(Agriades + Polyommatus) 17 35/40 37/30 3 6 98/96
9 Lycaenidae + Apodemia -20 14/7 20/22 7 -6 15/10
10 Danaus 60/67 63/75 83/62 36/28 14/24 256
11 Neominois + Oeneis 24/23 0 36/34 27/28.5 8/6.5 95/92
12 (N. ridingsii + O. chryxus) C. tullia 2 0 12/6 6 -2 18/12
13 ((N. ridingsii + O. chryxus) C. tullia) Bicyclus 22 12/10 8/10 4 7 53
14 Heliconius 22 19 13 12 -5 61
15 Heliconius +Agraulis 28 16 21 3 4 72
16 (Heliconius + Agraulis) Speyeria 12 10 12/13 10 -1 43/44
17 Limenitis 48 67/68 46/47 44 29 234/236
18 Limenitis + node 16 9 15/17 10/7 6 3 43/42
19 Vanessa + Nymphalis 20/16 23/27 23/27 14/17 4/-1 84/86
20 (Vanessa + Nymphalis) Euphydryas 9.5 23 13/14 6.5 8 60/61
21 Node 18 + Node 20 12 1/4 7/1 2 -1 21/18
22 Node 21 + Node 13 -4 8/11 8/9 4 -1 15/19
23 Node 22 + Node 10 2/-4 2/3 4/5 0/4 1/-1 9/7
24 Node 23 + Node 9 -20/-4 14/3 20/5 7/4 -6/-1 15/7
25 Node 24 + Node 2 4 0/-2 8/5 0 6 18/13
26 Node 25 + Node 1 18/13 14/9 35/9 0/6 -2/2 65/39
  Total 491.5/479.5 532/540 635/594 290.5/289 88/95.5 2037/1998
  Percentage 24 26/27 31/29.7 14/14.5 4.3/4.8 100
  1. Values represent support as calculated using data sets containing slower/faster evolving gene copies. Only one number is displayed when both analyses rendered the same value.