Skip to main content

Table 4 Gene diversity statistics of microsatellites, ITS and cpDNA variation

From: Taming the wild: resolving the gene pools of non-model Arabidopsislineages

  

Microsatellites

ITS haplotypes

trnLF haplotypes

 

Ploidy

Individuals analyzed

Nei’s gene diversity (SD)

Individuals analyzed

Nucleotide diversity (πx10-2) (SD)

Nei’s gene diversity (SD)

Individuals analyzed

Nucleotide diversity (πx10-2) (SD)

Nei’s gene diversity (SD)

A. lyrata group

 

288 (85)

0.562 (0.312)

126 (92)

0.248 (0.168)

0.797 (0.025)

176 (101)

0.224 (0.150)

0.751 (0.024)

A. arenicola

19 (14)

0.205 (0.156)

17 (16)

0.139 (0.117)

0.323 (0.135)

17 (15)

0.035 (0.047)

0.117 (0.101)

A. lyrata subsp. lyrata

57 (29)

0.378 (0.225)

37 (21)

0.014 (0.030)

0.516 (0.085)

54 (26)

0.058 (0.061)

0.380 (0.065)

A. petraea subsp. umbrosa

25 (16)

0.468 (0.272)

30 (18)

0.154 (0.118)

0.675 (0.061)

28 (18)

0.362 (0.225)

0.738 (0.053)

A. petraea subsp. septentrionalis

8 (8)

not calculated

10 (10)

0.030 (0.046)

0.200 (0.154)

9 (9)

0.323 (0.223)

0.694 (0.147)

A. lyrata subsp. petraea

187 (13)

0.556 (0.309)

31 (26)

0.025 (0.039)

0.898 (0.030)

61 (29)

0.229 (0.154)

0.766 (0.042)

A. lyrata subsp. petraea

25 (5)

not calculated

1 (1)

0.000

1.000 (0.000)

7 (4)

0.241 (0.185)

0.714 (0.180)

A. arenosa group

 

258 (79)

0.560 (0.311)

247 (181)

0.138 (0.107)

0.803 (0.024)

568 (263)

0.171 (0.123)

0.585 (0.023)

A. arenosa subsp. arenosa

76 (13)

not calculated

23 (23)

0.129 (0.106)

0.806 (0.061)

32 (28)

0.163 (0.122)

0.485 (0.107)

A. arenosa var. intermedia

14 (4)

not calculated

4 (3)

0.000

1.000 (0.176)

6 (5)

0.149 (0.133)

0.333 (0.215)

A. arenosa subsp. borbasii

160 (22)

not calculated

173 (120)

0.065 (0.066)

0.748 (0.033)

391 (167)

0.142 (0.107)

0.503 (0.029)

A. carpatica

113 (9)

0.554 (0.309)

8 (6)

0.065 (0.075)

0.750 (0.139)

51 (14)

0.282 (0.181)

0.752 (0.046)

A. petrogena

73 (7)

0.512 (0.289)

5 (4)

0.399 (0.298)

1.000 (0.298)

37 (20)

0.052 (0.058)

0.348 (0.077)

A. petrogena subsp. exoleta

56 (11)

not calculated

8 (6)

0.345 (0.241)

0.928 (0.084)

8 (6)

0.341 (0.238)

0.892 (0.085)

A. neglecta subsp. neglecta

35 (5)

0.451 (0.262)

8 (5)

0.323 (0.229)

0.928 (0.084)

16 (5)

0.111 (0.097)

0.450 (0.150)

A. neglecta subsp. robusta

8 (1)

not calculated

6 (3)

0.000

0.600 (0.215)

6 (3)

0.099 (0.101)

0.333 (0.215)

A. nitida

22 (4)

0.635 (0.354)

4 (4)

0.384 (0.309)

1.000 (0.176)

11 (6)

0.282 (0.196)

0.709 (0.099)

A. croatica

15 (3)

0.374 (0.228)

8 (7)

0.384 (0.263)

1.000 (0.062)

10 (9)

0.159 (0.129)

0.533 (0.094)

A. halleri group

 

259 (38)

0.427 (0.254)

103 (90)

0.159 (0.118)

0.901 (0.020)

94 (83)

0.268 (0.173)

0.712 (0.030)

A. halleri subsp. dacica

3 (3)

0.533 (0.380)

8 (7)

0.049 (0.063)

0.928 (0.084)

8 (7)

0.213 (0.165)

0.464 (0.200)

A. halleri subsp. halleri

199 (19)

0.392 (0.237)

67 (61)

0.036 (0.047)

0.858 (0.029)

62 (58)

0.236 (0.158)

0.670 (0.049)

A. halleri subsp. ovirensis

24 (4)

0.330 (0.204)

5 (4)

0.122 (0.122)

0.900 (0.161)

2 (1)

0.000

0.000

A. halleri subsp. tatrica

25 (7)

0.408 (0.242)

13 (10)

0.023 (0.039)

0.730 (0.096)

12 (10)

0.364 (0.238)

0.727 (0.113)

A. halleri subsp. gemmifera

8 (5)

0.301 (0.205)

9 (7)

0.570 (0.363)

0.916 (0.092)

9 (6)

0.000

0.000

A. umezawana

?

0

not calculated

1 (1)

0.000

1.000 (0.000)

1 (1)

0.000

1.000 (0.000)

A. cebennensis

153 (11)

0.189 (0.130)

8 (6)

0.185 (0.150)

0.785 (0.150)

148 (12)

0.174 (0.125)

0.702 (0.018)

A. pedemontana

40 (9)

0.259 (0.167)

2 (2)

0.312 (0.382)

1.000 (0.500)

9 (2)

0.000

0.000

  1. Nei’s Gene and nucleotide diversity [89] of microsatellite, ITS and cpDNA genetic variation among the various taxa. The number of individuals analyzed is indicated with respective number of populations in brackets. Standard deviation of mean genetic diversity is given in brackets.
  2. Gene diversity statistics for microsatellite variation among tetraploid populations was not calculated, but respective data are analyzed and displayed with hierarchical Structure analysis (see Figure 5).