Open Access

Clock model makes a large difference to age estimates of long-stemmed clades with no internal calibration: a test using Australian grasstrees

BMC Evolutionary Biology201414:263

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0263-3

Received: 7 August 2014

Accepted: 10 December 2014

Published: 19 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Estimating divergence times in phylogenies using a molecular clock depends on accurate modeling of nucleotide substitution rates in DNA sequences. Rate heterogeneity among lineages is likely to affect estimates, especially in lineages with long stems and short crowns (“broom” clades) and no internal calibration. We evaluate the performance of the random local clocks model (RLC) and the more routinely employed uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock model (UCLN) in situations in which a significant rate shift occurs on the stem branch of a broom clade. We compare the results of simulations to empirical results from analyses of a real rate-heterogeneous taxon – Australian grass trees (Xanthorrhoea) – whose substitution rate is slower than in its sister groups, as determined by relative rate tests.

Results

In the simulated datasets, the RLC model performed much better than UCLN: RLC correctly estimated the age of the crown node of slow-rate broom clades, whereas UCLN estimates were consistently too young. Similarly, in the Xanthorrhoea dataset, UCLN returned significantly younger crown ages than RLC (mean estimates respectively 3–6 Ma versus 25–35 Ma). In both real and simulated datasets, Bayes Factor tests strongly favored the RLC model over the UCLN model.

Conclusions

The choice of an unsuitable molecular clock model can strongly bias divergence time estimates. In particular, for data predicted to have more rate variation among than within clades, dating with RLC is much more likely to be accurate than with UCLN. The choice of clocks should be informed by the biology of the study group (e.g., life-form) or assessed with relative rate tests and post-hoc model comparisons.

Keywords

Divergence times Substitution rate heterogeneity Uncorrelated lognormal clock Random local clocks Relative rates Life history Xanthorrhoea

Background

Molecular-clock dating of long-stemmed clades (“broom” or “stemmy” clades [1]) is prone to large estimation errors partly because calibration points can be placed only at nodes, not part-way along stems [2],[3]. Likewise, shifts in substitution rate along lineages can be detected only at nodes, and cannot be placed within unbroken stems. As molecular dating depends upon accuracy of rate modelling, inferred rate variation within long branches has been hypothesized to contribute to dating error, e.g. in the crown node of angiosperms [4]. Calibration is critically important for reducing error in molecular dating [5]-[7], for instance by improving estimates of rate heterogeneity among lineages [8]. Conversely, estimation error is greater in target clades when calibrations are experimentally omitted [9]. Furthermore, abrupt rate shifts in some lineages of a phylogeny, followed by rate conservation, can mislead rate and age estimation, even when the node of interest is calibrated [9].

A strict molecular clock has been rejected in analyses of most empirical datasets, and is inapplicable to data in which rate shifts occur, so relaxed molecular clock models are used widely (reviewed in [10]). Commonly used relaxed clocks include uncorrelated, autocorrelated and local clocks. In an autocorrelated clock, the rate along a given branch is more similar to its parent branch than a branch chosen at random, though autocorrelation models differ in the degree to which they restrict rate variation between parent and daughter branches. A local clocks model differs from an autocorrelated clock by setting a single rate throughout a contiguous section of the tree, allowing relatively few such clocks in different parts of the tree, with abrupt shifts in rate between these clocks. An uncorrelated clock has a distinct rate along each branch, with the rates drawn at random from a specified probability distribution, thus allowing random and frequent rate shifts. The uncorrelated lognormal (UCLN) model draws its rates from a lognormal distribution and appears to be more robust to violation of assumptions about clock rate variation, and a better fit to simulated and empirical datasets, than are strict or autocorrelated clock models [11],[12]. Moreover, studies differ in whether they find support for uncorrelated clocks [11],[12] or correlated clocks [13]. If rates shift infrequently and are conserved along lineages, then dating using either an uncorrelated or correlated model could be inaccurate and local models can be a better fit [9],[10],[14]. Having the means to detect if and when rates shift, and to correct branch lengths accordingly, could be critically important to evolutionary analysis using molecular phylogenies.

The random local clocks (RLC) model proposes and compares a series of alternative local molecular clocks, each potentially arising on any branch and extending over a contiguous part of the phylogeny. In BEAST, the RLC model parameters (rates and shift points) are estimated simultaneously with phylogenetic relationships in a Bayesian framework [10],[15]. In a real and a simulated phylogeny that included abrupt and sustained rate shifts, RLC outperformed UCLN in terms of accuracy of divergence-time estimates, and UCLN estimates were misleadingly precise [9].

To date, there have not been comparisons of RLC and UCLN models based on multiple phylogenies exhibiting rate heterogeneity among lineages. As modelling of DNA substitution rates directly affects estimation of dates, the assumptions of underlying rate models should be biologically realistic. For example, if substitution rates depend upon certain life history traits, then abrupt shifts in these traits might suggest an RLC clock model is preferable to UCLN. Although the determinants of rate variation among lineages are often unclear [16]-[18], undoubtedly there are lineage-specific effects that result from shifts in life history and life forms in different clades of organisms. Among mammals, generation time is strongly negatively correlated with substitution rate, and is explained by the sequestering of the female germ line (egg cells) early in the development of the female [17],[19]. Plants also show a negative relationship between substitution rate and generation time [16],[18],[20], though the primary cause is unclear because, in contrast to mammals, female gametes are produced multiple times during the life of the individual. Recently, it has been shown that plant height correlates better with rate than does generation time – taller plants have slower rates [20]. These authors suggest that the rate of mitosis in apical meristems may be the determining factor because taller plants have slower growth at their tips.

Here, we use a simulation approach to evaluate the performance of RLC and UCLN models. We simulate multiple trees having a long-stemmed clade with a known crown age, and then simulate DNA datasets on these trees so that there is a large downward shift in substitution rate associated with the long stem. We compare the accuracy of the RLC and UCLN clock models in retrieving the known crown age of the long-stemmed clade, and also use marginal likelihoods to determine which model is the better fit. We compare these results with those we obtain using Australian grass trees (Xanthorrhoea), a group that is expected to show a slower substitution rate than their relatives. As the crown age of Xanthorrhoea is unknown, we compare the performance of the UCLN and RLC clock models using marginal likelihoods to determine which is the better fit. Xanthorrhoea is a genus of arborescent grasstrees and a characteristic plant of the fire-dependent sclerophyll biome with nutrient-poor soils in western, southern and eastern Australia, sometimes dominating the shrub layer. It is the only genus in Xanthorrhoeaceae subfamily Xanthorrhoeoideae. Extant Xanthorrhoea appears to have undergone major morphological and ecological transformations compared with the last common ancestor that it shared with its worldwide sister groups (Xanthorrhoeaceae subfamilies Hemerocallidoideae and Asphodeloideae). The latter clades have diverse morphologies and life histories but most are smaller and faster-maturing plants than Xanthorrhoea.

Several traits in Xanthorrhoea lead us to predict that this lineage evolves more slowly than its sister groups. The plants have a palm-like form with one or few apical meristems and are long-lived (up to 450 yr) with slow apical growth (10–20 mm p.a.) [21] and reproductive maturity may not be reached until 20–30 years of age [22]. Reproduction in Xanthorrhoea occurs mainly in the first spring following a wildfire [21],[23] (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and, in the sclerophyll biome, estimates of intervals between fires range from 3–5 to 10–25 yr [21],[22],[24]. Thus, generation time is likely longer even than is indicated by the slow growth rates alone. It has been suggested that both generation time (which is linked to longevity) and the rate of apical growth (which is linked with the rate of mitosis) are negatively related to DNA substitution rate in plants [20]. Mutations occur when DNA is replicated and cells divide (by meiosis and mitosis) and are passed to the next generation; thus variation in both generation time [17] and plant height [20] are likely to explain variation in DNA substitution rates. We test the hypothesis of a substitution rate shift downwards in Xanthorrhoea by using the well-known Relative Rates test that assumes no phylogeny [25], followed by a phylogenetic test that corrects for the confounding effect of within-clade rate variation (Local Clock Permutation Test [26]). We then use Bayesian phylogenetics (BEAST) to estimate the crown age for Xanthorrhoea with the same combinations of clock and tree models as used on the simulated datasets. We consider the implications of our results for the estimation of clade ages when rates vary among lineages.

Results

Simulations of strong among-clade substitution rate variation

Our simulated datasets were designed to mirror our understanding of the evolution of the Xanthorrhoeaceae, i.e. a phylogenetic tree including a long-stemmed “broom” clade, a slow molecular clock and a crown with no internal calibration, and a “bush” sister clade with a short stem, faster clock and internal calibration (e.g., Figures 12). The major difference was that, in the simulated dataset, the crown age of the slow-clock clade was known in advance. As expected, in the BEAST analyses, the RLC clock model (Figure 3) outperformed UCLN (Figure 4) and accurately reconstructed the abrupt and sustained change in substitution rate occurring along the long internal branch of the broom clade (at least under the simulation conditions used here). The true crown age of the broom clade in each simulated dataset was 25 Ma. Under RLC, the mean age estimate for this node was 28.4 Ma (95% BCI = 11–42 Ma) with a Birth-death phylogenetic tree model, and 29.4 (14–43) Ma with a Yule model (Figure 5, Additional file 2: Table S1). In all RLC analyses, the true age fell within the 95% BCI of the estimate. By contrast, under UCLN, the mean estimates were much younger, being 4.1 (0.5-11) Ma (Birth-death) and 4.9 (0.5-10) Ma (Yule), and the upper (older) limit of the 95% BCI never contained the true age (Figure 5, Additional file 2: Table S1). Age estimates under the two clock models were significantly different (Mann–Whitney test, P < 0.0001; H0 = difference in means is 0) for both tree models (Birth-death and Yule). By contrast, comparisons between the Yule and Birth-death age estimates within each clock model did not find significant differences (Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.912 for RLC and P = 0.0524 for UCLN; see also Figure 5). Under RLC (with both tree models), the number of rate shifts inferred was small (median = 1, mean = 1.2-1.5) across all ten simulated datasets. The simulated trees varied in size from 19 to 42 terminals, and in the proportion of terminals in the bush vs broom clades, from 31 vs 4 to 6 vs 20 (Additional file 2: Table S1). There was no evidence that the date estimates showed a systematic relationship with either tree size (number of terminals) or relative clade sizes. For all 10 simulated datasets, Bayes factors calculated from marginal likelihoods found “very strong” support (BF > 10 [27]) for RLC over UCLN under both the Birth-death and Yule phylogenetic tree models.
Figure 1

Example of a simulated chronogram (Tree 1 of 10). Tree parameters were based on those of Xanthorrhoeaceae and were simulated using TESS using a birth-death model, and “broom” and “bush” sister clades. The age of the root was fixed at 45 Ma, that of the broom crown node at 25 Ma, as marked with open circles. DNA sequences were then simulated along the branches of the trees using a GTR + Γ substitution model with slow (broom clade) and fast (bush clade) rates (Figure 2), as in Xanthorrhoeaceae, to test the relative performance of the UCLN and RLC clock models. The simulated trees varied in size from 19 to 42 terminals, and also in the proportion of terminals in the bush vs broom clades, from 31 vs 4 to 6 vs 20. For the BEAST analyses, three log-normal age-calibration priors were used: one was placed on the stem of the broom clade and two were placed on the stem of each of two clades internal to the bush clade (marked with closed circles). The mean and offset of each calibration prior were equal to half the distance between the crown and stem nodes of the respective clade.

Figure 2

A maximum likelihood phylogram estimated from DNA sequences simulated on the tree in Figure 1. We simulated a 1 Kb sequence set using the R package PhyloSim with a GTR + Γ model of substitution (as for Xanthorrhoeaceae), with the alpha parameter set to 1. Substitution rates were modelled by setting the probability of each particular substitution in a Q matrix, with a probability 10 times higher in the bush clade than in the broom clade. See text for the full set of parameter values. Branch lengths are proportional to the substitution rates and illustrate the overall 10x rate difference between the broom and bush clades, and additionally, the stochasticity built into the model. The phylogram was generated in CIPRES using RAxML with a GTR + Γ model.

Figure 3

Reconstruction of the simulated chronogram (Figure 1) using BEAST with the RLC clock model and calibration priors as shown on Figure 1. Each estimate assumed a GTR + Γ substitution model. Branches are colored by inferred local clock rates in the introns partition: red = fast, blue = slow, and each branch is labelled with the estimated rate (substitutions site−1 Myr−1). Estimated age with 95% BCI is shown for the broom crown node (open circle).

Figure 4

Reconstruction of the simulated chronogram (Figure 1) using BEAST with the UCLN clock model and calibration priors as shown on Figure 1. Each estimate assumed a GTR + Γ substitution model. Branches are colored by inferred local clock rates in the introns partition: red = fast, blue = slow, and each branch is labelled with the estimated rate (substitutions site−1 Myr−1). Estimated age (with 95% BCI) is shown for the broom crown node (open circle).

Figure 5

Estimated crown ages of long-stemmed “broom” clades in simulated trees using BEAST with UCLN and RLC clock models in combination with Birth-death (BD, black) and Yule (grey) phylogenetic tree models. Trees were simulated using TESS with a BD model and sequences simulated on the trees using PhyloSim with a local clock model in which the substitution rate was 10x slower in the broom clade than in its sister “bush” clade. Each large dot represents the mean age across 10 simulated trees, error bars are mean 95% BCIs, and small open circles represent the extreme 95% BCIs across all 10 datasets. The horizontal broken line shows the true age (25 Ma) of the broom crown node.

Xanthorrhoeaceae phylogeny

To derive a secondary age calibration for the crown node of Xanthorrhoeaceae, a phylogenetic dating analysis was carried out on a broad sample of monocots including multiple fossil calibration points and using sequences of the chloroplast regions ndhF and trnL-F. The resulting topologies of both the RAxML and BEAST trees (Additional file 3: Figures S2 and S3) were congruent with published trees [28]-[30] and returned strong support for monophyly of Xanthorrhoeaceae and its subfamilies, and for a sister group relationship between Xanthorrhoea and Hemerocallidoideae. Partitioned and non-partitioned models made little difference to the topologies, except in clades with poor resolution, e.g., within the crown of Xanthorrhoea. The maximum likelihood (RAxML) analysis indicated rate heterogeneity within Xanthorrhoeaceae, insofar as Xanthorrhoeoideae have much shorter branches than in the other two subfamilies (Additional file 3: Figure S2).From the Xanthorrhoeaceae-only datasets, which were comprehensively sampled at the species level, cpDNA and rpb2 both yielded maximum likelihood trees in which the branch lengths were conspicuously shorter within Xanthorrhoea than in the sister groups (Additional file 3: Figures S4 and S5). The cpDNA tree differs from the monocot tree in placing Xanthorrhoea sister to Asphodeloideae but with weak support (bootstrap = 67). In contrast, the rpb2 tree shows Xanthorrhoea nested within successively paraphyletic groups of Hemerocallidoideae and Asphodeloideae. Paralogous copies of rpb2 are evident, e.g. clones from individuals of Phormium are in separate lineages (Additional file 3: Figure S4), though Xanthorrhoea is monophyletic (bootstrap = 100). With both loci and under both clock models, BEAST gave topologies (Figures 6 and 7, Additional file 3: Figures S6-S10) that were substantively the same as those from RAxML (Additional file 3: Figures S4 and S5), at least for well-supported nodes.
Figure 6

Random local clocks (RLC) chronogram of Xanthorrhoeaceae from combined ndhF and trnL - trnF (chloroplast DNA) sequences. Analysis used BEAST with a Yule tree model. Branches are colored by inferred local clock rates: red = fastest, blue = slowest, orange and green = intermediate, and each branch is labelled with the actual rate (substitutions site−1 Myr−1 × 104). Filled pointers show likely rate shifts (to right = upwards, to left = downwards); open pointers show possible alternatives. Clade labels with bars indicate subfamilies. The scale indicates time before present (Ma).

Figure 7

RLC chronogram of Xanthorrhoeaceae derived from sequences of rpb2 (nuclear DNA). Analysis used BEAST with a Yule tree model. Branches are colored by inferred local clock rates in the introns partition: red = fast, blue = slow, and each branch is labelled with the actual rate (substitutions site−1 Myr−1 × 104). Pointers show the two inferred rate shifts: one downwards in the MRCA of Xanthorrhoeoideae (filled pointer), followed by a second shift (open pointers), which was either a further downward shift in the stem of the large upper clade or a small upward shift in the stem of the X. macronema + X. gracilis clade. The pattern of exon rates and shifts is essentially similar but slower (Additional file 3: Figure S11). Clade labels with bars indicate subfamilies. The scale indicates time before present (Ma).

Bayesian model fitting in Xanthorrhoeaceae

A posteriori Bayes factor tests using the marginal likelihoods from the BEAST analyses found a clear preference among alternative models in all three datasets (Table 1). Partitioned loci were preferred to non-partitioned “very strongly” [27] in both the monocots-cpDNA and Xanthorrhoeaceae-rpb2 datasets, while non-partitioned loci were preferred in the Xanthorrhoeaceae-cpDNA dataset. All tests indicated a preference for Yule over Birth-death tree models, very strongly in most cases. Comparison of clock models in the Xanthorrhoeaceae-only datasets (cpDNA and rpb2) found a strong preference for RLC over UCLN in both loci (Table 1). Clock comparisons could not be made in the large monocot-cpDNA dataset because twelve separate analyses using RLC did not reach stationarity or convergence after 300 M generations. This failure is not surprising given reports of similar difficulties with estimating the parameters for this model [9],[15]. The problem appears to arise from inefficient sampling by the Markov chains when transitions between alternative states require large moves [9] and is exacerbated in large and/or complex datasets. Results presented from the BEAST analyses are all from the preferred model combinations shown in Table 1, except where specified otherwise for comparative purposes.
Table 1

Model comparisons using Bayes factors calculated from marginal likelihoods in BEAST

Dataset

Preferred model combination

Non-preferred model combination

Bayes factor with interpretation

Monocots, cpDNA

   
 

UCLN, BD, p

UCLN, BD, np

19510.4***

 

UCLN, Yule, p

UCLN, Yule, np

19510.8***

 

UCLN, Yule, p (best overall)

UCLN, BD, p

19.31***

Xanthorrhoeaceae, cpDNA

   
 

UCLN, BD, np

UCLN, BD, p

26.53***

 

UCLN, Yule, np

UCLN, Yule, p

29.66***

 

RLC, BD, np

RLC, BD, p

38.85***

 

RLC, Yule, np

RLC, Yule, p

59.98***

 

UCLN, Yule, np

UCLN, BD, np

8.39**

 

RLC, Yule, np

RLC, BD, np

16.26***

 

RLC, Yule, np (best overall)

UCLN, BD, np

7.36**

Xanthorrhoeaceae, rpb2

   
 

UCLN, BD, p

UCLN, BD, np

238.44***

 

UCLN, Yule, p

UCLN, Yule, np

60.42***

 

RLC, BD, p

RLC, BD, np

219.8***

 

RLC, Yule, p

RLC, Yule, np

267.27***

 

UCLN, BD, p

UCLN, Yule, np

16.08***

 

RLC, Yule, p

RLC, BD, p

204.75***

 

RLC, Yule, p (best overall)

UCLN, BD, p

249.98***

Within each dataset, model comparisons follow the nested sequence: partitioned (p) vs non-partitioned (np) loci; Birth-death (BD) vs Yule phylogenetic tree models; and uncorrelated lognormal (UCLN) vs random local clocks (RLC). Each row compares the bolded models, with other models held constant. For each dataset, the best model combination overall (highest marginal likelihood) is indicated, and in each case is (very) strongly preferred to the second best. Asterisks after the Bayes factors indicate their interpretation according to [27]: ** = “strong” (6 ≤ BF < 10) and *** = “very strong” (BF ≥ 10) evidence favouring the model with the higher lnL. Results are shown for path sampling only because those from stepping stone sampling were identical.

Are substitution rates slow in Xanthorrhoea?

Substitution rates were compared across Xanthorrhoea and its outgroups using the relative rates test, local clock permutation test and results of the BEAST analyses, and all indicated a markedly slower rate in Xanthorrhoea than in its close relatives.

The simple relative rate test [25] does not assume a phylogenetic tree and makes pairwise comparisons of sequence dissimilarities between two groups relative to an outgroup to assess whether the two sets of dissimilarities are significantly different. We used uncorrected p-distances among sequences and found significant substitution rate differences between Xanthorrhoea and its sister groups (Hemerocallidoideae plus Asphodeloideae) in both loci (cpDNA and rpb2) and relative to both alternate outgroup sequences (Lomandra confertiflora and L. glauca): two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test, P < 0.0001 in every case.

The local-clock permutation test [26] is a phylogenetic tree-based randomisation test that corrects for within-clade rate variation. We performed one-tailed LCPT tests, which showed that substitution rate has been significantly slower in Xanthorrhoea than in its sister groups, both in cpDNA (P = 0.002) and in rpb2 (full dataset, P = 0.027; rarefied terminal sample, P = 0.029).

From the BEAST posteriors, estimated rates in cpDNA were slower in Xanthorrhoeaceae than in monocots as a whole and, within the family, slower for both loci in Xanthorrhoeoideae than in the other two subfamilies (Additional file 2: Table S2). The median substitution rate in Xanthorrhoeaceae was considerably slower in cpDNA than in rpb2 introns, under both the UCLN (7.5 vs 69.8 × 10−4 substitutions/site/Myr) and RLC (6.4 vs 35.6 × 10−4 substitutions/site/Myr) clocks, and marginally slower than in the exons (Additional file 2: Table S2). This result was consistent with the pattern observed across plants generally (reviewed in [16],[31],[32]). For example, Gaut [32] estimated the synonymous rate across multiple plastid genes to be 11.3 (95% BCI = 4.5-17.7), which overlaps our estimate of 15.8 (13.5-18.3) across monocots (Additional file 2: Table S2). His estimate for nuclear genes of 60.3 (45–75) is faster than ours but this could reflect conservatism in rpb2, or the generally slower rates in Xanthorrhoeaceae, or that we have not distinguished synonymous from non-synonymous rates.

Rate shifts within Xanthorrhoeaceae

The pattern of rate variation within the trees inferred by BEAST differed considerably between clock models, as expected. For both loci, under the UCLN clock most branches had a different rate from their parent (thus implying many rate shifts), though rates within Xanthorrhoea varied less, and were generally lower, than in the sister groups. By contrast, the RLC model inferred a small number of local clocks, with few shifts between them (Figures 6 and 7, Additional file 3: Figure S7; details below). For both loci, substitution rates inferred within the Xanthorrhoea crown by RLC were much lower than from UCLN, by an order of magnitude or more, and were significantly different because the 95% BCIs do not overlap (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Additional file 3: Figure S11 d-f). This result was expected following the relative rates tests. By contrast, the UCLN clock-rate differences between these taxa were neither as large nor significant, though cpDNA rates in Xanthorrhoeaceae were significantly slower than in monocots overall (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Additional file 3: Figure S11 a-c).

To test whether the number of rate shifts inferred under the RLC model using the real data departed significantly from the null expectation (zero shifts, i.e. a strict molecular clock), we ran priors-only analyses (i.e. without data) and compared overlap between the two distributions for this parameter [cf. 9]. The relaxed local clocks (RLC) model inferred 3–6 (95% BCI) substitution rate shifts in the cpDNA posterior and ≤ 3 in rpb2 (Additional file 3: Figure S12). In both loci (and both partitions of rpb2), the prior expectation of a single (strict) molecular clock was rejected, as there was essentially no overlap between the 95% BCIs of the prior and posterior distributions of the “rateChangeCount” parameter, the priors being 0–1 in both loci (Additional file 3: Figure S12). Additionally, Fisher exact tests indicate that each pair of prior and posterior distributions is significantly different (P = 0.0000). Downward rate shifts in Xanthorrhoea were inferred either at the base of the stem (cpDNA, Figure 6) or within the crown (rpb2 introns, Figure 7; rpb2 exons, Additional file 3: Figure S7) and these low rates were sustained throughout the crown in all three partitions.

Within the rpb2 crown of Xanthorrhoea, the RLC clock inferred two shifts to rates that are slower than in the stem but it is unclear whether these shifts occurred sequentially or independently (Figure 7, Additional file 3: Figure S7 and Additional file 2: Table S2). In cpDNA, one or two sequential downward rate shifts are inferred in Xanthorrhoea: one shift in the stem, possibly followed by a smaller shift at the crown node (Figure 6, Additional file 2: Table S2). Although neither individual shift was significant (judged by overlap between the BCIs at successive nodes), the cumulative change between the MRCA of Asphodeloideae + Xanthorrhoea (95% BCI = 6.1-15.6 × 10−4 substitutions/site/Myr) and the crown of the latter (95% BCI = 0.18-1.7 × 10−4 substitutions/site/Myr) was significant. Given that rate shifts can be detected only at nodes, this result is consistent with either (a) one or more incremental downward shifts along the stem of Xanthorrhoea (i.e. between the stem and crown node) and/or (b) independent shifts within the Xanthorrhoea crown.

Age estimates within Xanthorrhoea

Age estimates within Xanthorrhoea by BEAST varied among loci and clock models, though the effect of clocks was greater (Table 2). The most significant differences occurred in the Xanthorrhoea crown age estimates (Figure 8). When comparing the same model across the different loci, the estimates were almost identical (Table 2; except Birth-death with RLC, see below) but the differences were large and significant between clock models. Estimates under UCLN (median ages 3–6 Ma) were much younger than those under RLC (26–30 Ma). Moreover, the 95% BCIs did not overlap between estimates from the different clocks (Figure 8). Stem-age estimates varied less between models than did crown ages (Table 2). From the Xanthorrhoeaceae-cpDNA dataset, the estimate for the Xanthorrhoea stem was almost identical under both clock models (58 and 59 Ma) and older in the monocot-cpDNA dataset (68 Ma), though the 95% BCIs overlap (Table 2). From rpb2, the median stem ages were very similar under both models and younger (40 and 44 Ma) than the estimates from cpDNA, though the BCIs overlapped (Table 2).
Table 2

Ages of selected nodes estimated by BEAST

Dataset

Clock model

Tree model

Partitioned

Node age estimates (with 95% BCI)

    

Xanthorr-hoeaceae crown

Xanthorr-hoea stem

Xanthorrhoea crown

Hemerocall-idoideae crown

Asphodel-oideae crown

Monocots, cpDNA

 
 

UCLN

Birth-death

no

72 (62–83)

68 (58–78)

4.8 (1.9-9.8)

62 (54–72)

35 (21–53)

 

UCLN

Birth-death

yes

68 (60–78)

64 (56–72)

4.8 (2.0-9.0)

58 (51–65)

31 (20–44)

 

UCLN

Yule

no

74 (63–85)

70 (60–81)

5.0 (2.0-10.3)

63 (56–75)

37 (21–55)

 

UCLN

Yule

yes

70 (61–79)

65 (58–74)

4.8 (2.2-9.3)

59 (52–67)

32 (20–47)

Xanthorrhoeaceae, cpDNA

 
 

UCLN

Birth-death

no

71 (69–73)

58 (43–70)

5.7 (2.4-11.7)

60 (58–72)

34 (22–47)

 

UCLN

Birth-death

yes

71 (70–73)

60 (49–70)

5.0 (2.4-8.7)

66 (59–72)

35 (26–45)

 

UCLN

Yule

no

71 (70–73)

58 (44–70)

6.4 (2.6-13.0)

66 (59–72)

35 (23–48)

 

UCLN

Yule

yes

71 (70–73)

60 (50–71)

5.4 (2.6-9.4)

66 (59–72)

36 (27–46)

 

RLC

Birth-death

no

72 (70–73)

59 (46–69)

30 (12–59)

68 (59–73)

24 (16–32)

 

RLC

Birth-death

yes

72 (70–74)

63 (51–72)

24 (9–58)

61 (54–72)

27 (18–34)

 

RLC

Yule

no

72 (70–74)

60 (46–70)

35 (13–59)

69 (60–73)

24 (17–33)

 

RLC

Yule

yes

72 (70–73)

63 (52–72)

27 (12–68)

60 (54–71)

27 (19–34)

Xanthorrhoeaceae, rpb2

 
 

UCLN

Birth-death

no

71 (69–73)

41 (24–59)

3.4 (1.5-6.1)

-

-

 

UCLN

Birth-death

yes

71 (69–73)

32 (21–45)

3.3 (1.8-5.7)

-

-

 

UCLN

Yule

no

71 (69–73)

20 (3–46)

13 (2–31)

-

-

 

UCLN

Yule

yes

71 (70–73)

26 (14–39)

5.7 (2.9-9.7)

-

-

 

RLC

Birth-death

no

71 (69–73)

40 (31–54)

27 (17–37)

-

-

 

RLC

Birth-death

yes

71 (69–73)

35 (28–43)

5.0 (2.8-7.8)

-

-

 

RLC

Yule

no

71 (69–73)

40 (32–48)

26 (17–35)

-

-

 

RLC

Yule

yes

71 (70–73)

38 (30–46)

24 (15–32)

-

-

The Xanthorrhoea crown was the target node for dating, being the broom clade with no internal calibration. In the two Xanthorrhoeaceae datasets (cpDNA and rpb2), the root (= family crown node) was calibrated with a normal prior, mean = 71, SD = 1.0. Rows with bolded text have the best-fit model combination for each dataset as assessed by Bayes factors using marginal likelihoods estimated from BEAST using path and stepping-stone sampling. BCI = 95% Bayesian confidence internal. UCLN = uncorrelated lognormal clock. RLC = random local clocks.

Figure 8

Estimated age of the Xanthorrhoea crown from three datasets. Estimates are from BEAST with UCLN and RLC clock models in combination with Birth-death and Yule speciation models. DNA substitution models were partitioned (details in text) based on the results of Bayes factor tests for each dataset. Each data point represents the median age estimate for a different combination of data and models and error bars are 95% BCIs. Asterisks mark the best combination of models for each dataset (except monocots), as indicated by Bayes factors. Abbreviation: Xanth = Xanthorrhoeaceae.

Against the general trend, the age estimated for the Xanthorrhoea crown under RLC with Birth-death for rpb2 (5.0 Ma, 95% BCI = 2.8-7.8) was much younger than the other RLC estimates and within the range of estimates from UCLN (Figure 8, Table 2, Additional file 3: Figures S8 and S9). This reconstruction infers a downward rate shift in the Xanthorrhoea stem that remains unchanged throughout the crown for the introns (Additional file 3: Figure S8), and a single rate throughout Xanthorrhoeaceae for the exons (Additional file 3: Figure S9). However, it should be noted that the Yule model was very strongly preferred to Birth-death for rpb2 (Table 1) and gave an age estimate well within the range of other RLC estimates for this node (24 Ma, 95% BCI = 15–32; (Table 2).

Discussion

Node age estimates differ significantly between uncorrelated and correlated clock models

Our BEAST analyses of the simulated datasets returned accurate dates under the RLC clock whereas UCLN invariably failed to retrieve the true date, even within the 95% BCIs. Using a single simulated tree, Dornburg et al. [9] also obtained more accurate age estimates with RLC than UCLN. With the latter clock, their estimates were misleadingly precise, i.e. ULCN gave narrower BCIs than did RLC, but was less accurate. The simulations presented here go further than [9] by using multiple simulated datasets with different tree sizes and relative clade sizes, and by explicitly testing the accuracy of age estimation in uncalibrated “broom” clades. Thus we have shown that accurate age estimates depend upon accurate clock modelling, and that these results are not an artefact of a particular tree shape or relative clade sizes. We conclude that, for data predicted to include local clocks, dating with RLC is much more likely to be accurate than with UCLN.

Median age estimates within Xanthorrhoeaceae differ by an order of magnitude under the two clock models (Table 2). This is the direct consequence of the differences in substitution rates inferred under each model. The most striking differences lie in estimates for the Xanthorrhoea crown: the median ages vary from 3.3 to 35 Ma and, with a single exception (discussed below), the 95% BCIs do not overlap between the different clocks for a given locus and phylogenetic tree model combination (Figure 8). In contrast, crown age estimates from different loci under the same clock are close (Figure 8), and the BCIs overlap substantially. Median age estimates also differ between clocks, by 10–20 Ma, for the Xanthorrhoea stem and the Asphodeloideae crown (Table 2). As the Bayes factor tests indicated a clear preference (BF = “very strong”) for the RLC model over UCLN, combined with the Yule tree model, it appears likely that the age of the Xanthorrhoea crown is about 24 (rpb2) to 35 (cpDNA) Ma with a wide range of uncertainty (inclusive 95% BCIs = 13–59).

Where RLC locates rate shifts influences dates

In both the simulated and empirical datasets, a relatively small number of rate shifts, with rate conservation along lineages between shifts, are inferred by RLC. However, the exact number of rate shifts under RLC (Additional file 3: Figure S12), and their location on the phylogeny, are usually uncertain. Even when it appears clear that a rate shift has occurred between a parent node and its immediate daughter, the shift could have occurred anywhere along the branch connecting these nodes. This uncertainty is greater in longer branches, e.g., the stem of Xanthorrhoea. Another source of uncertainty is whether a net directional rate shift in a clade has occurred in a single large step or cumulatively in several smaller steps along successive branches. Such uncertainty can critically affect dating of a particular node. For example, an anomalously young date (~5.0 Ma) was estimated for the Xanthorrhoea crown node using RLC with a Birth-death speciation prior from the rpb2 dataset (Table 2, Figure 8). This analysis reconstructed a single downward rate shift at the stem node (Additional file 3: Figure S8) but, in contrast, RLC with Yule reconstructed two smaller shifts, both within the crown (Figure 7) and, consequently, a much older age (~24 Ma) for the crown node (Table 2, Figure 8). Thus, the RLC clock, even if appropriate for the data, does not necessarily reconstruct dates accurately (the two reconstructions are mutually exclusive).

As the combination of Yule with RLC was very strongly preferred to Birth-death + RLC by the marginal likelihood tests, the anomalously young date from the latter combination could be discounted in this case. Nevertheless, the question remains of why the Birth-death and Yule models returned a large difference in age estimates for the Xanthorrhoea crown and reconstructed rate shifts that were similar but at different nodes. Perhaps the difference resulted from an interaction between the phylogenetic-branching and rate-shift parameters along the stem of Xanthorrhoea (a long branch). It could have arisen from mis-specification of the phylogenetic branching model, a known issue [33],[34], because the only difference between these two analyses was the use of the alternative phylogenetic branching models.

Substitution rates have slowed in Xanthorrhoea

We have found strong evidence in favour of a lineage effect [18] in substitution rates within Xanthorrhoeaceae. That is, the molecular clock ticks much more slowly in Xanthorrhoea than in the rest of the family in general. Multiple lines of evidence support these conclusions: (a) significant results from both relative rates tests (RRT and LCPT); (b) rejection of a single clock across the family by comparing the prior versus posterior estimates of the number of rate shifts under the RLC (local clocks) model; (c) inference by BEAST of downward rate shifts, of about an order of magnitude, in the stem and/or crown of Xanthorrhoea; and (d) replication of these findings in two loci from genomes (chloroplast and nuclear) with different modes of inheritance.

Life history and substitution rates

Given that two unlinked loci in different genomes show the downward rate shift in Xanthorrhoea, the likely cause is a factor that affects both genomes rather than locus-specific factors such as selection, or genome-specific effects such as polymerase error rate or efficiency of DNA repair [16]. Instead, the concerted rate shifts in these unlinked loci suggest a factor external to the genomes, such as life-history, speciation rate, or environmental factors that affect the metabolic rate [17],[18]. Given that Xanthorrhoea occurs across a wide range of latitude and moisture regimes, and co-occurs with multiple species from its sister groups, environment is unlikely to be the cause of the rate shift. Our results are consistent with previous studies that found that plant lineages with life history traits similar to Xanthorrhoea also have slow rates of molecular evolution. These traits include an arborescent palm-like life form, longevity, slow growth rate and single or few-branched stems. The palm-like life form has one or few apical meristems and is likely to have a slower overall rate of mitosis than much-branched plants with many growing tips. Our results are also consistent with earlier findings that speciation rate and substitution rate are positively correlated, though the causal factors are unclear [18],[35],[36]: Xanthorrhoea has fewer species (28) and a slower rate of substitution than its sister groups (Hemerocallidoideae ~ 85, Asphodeloideae ~ 785) [37].

Within Xanthorrhoea, rates appear to vary with growth habit: X. macronema and X. gracilis have rpb2 substitution rates at least twice as fast as in other grasstrees (Additional file 2: Table S2) and differ from them in being trunkless, softer and grass-like. Xanthorrhoea gracilis is shallow-rooted and can be killed by fire more readily than the other species [21]. However, the underlying factors linking multiple correlated life-history traits to molecular evolutionary rates remain unclear. As fewer-branched plants have fewer apical meristems, the mitosis hypothesis [20], which posits that substitution rate is correlated with the number of mitotic events, could be tested by comparing substitution rates among plant lineages that differ in their degree of branching but have otherwise similar life histories.

Implications for macroevolution

The possibility that UCLN significantly under-estimates the age of broom clades has implications for macroevolutionary investigations using molecular dating. For example, in Xanthorrhoea, the RLC model preferred by our analyses suggests a crown age of 24–35 Ma, implying that Xanthorrhoea diversified from about the end of the Eocene. The broom crown of this clade, combined with the long stem, suggests that an extinction event [cf. 1] occurred at this time, when global climate deteriorated significantly, and then the clade re-diversified through the Oligocene and Miocene. This timing and diversification pattern are congruent with those in other taxa co-occurring with Xanthorrhoea in the Australian temperate sclerophyll biome, such as Callitris (Cupressaceae), Casuarinaceae, Eucalypteae (Myrtaceae), and pea-flowered legumes (Fabaceae: Bossiaeeae), which are considered to have responded to the same climate-change event [38]. In contrast, the much younger crown ages obtained using UCLN for Xanthorrhoea (3–6 Ma), but rejected by our tests, would favour a conclusion that extinction and re-radiation occurred during the Pliocene and Pleistocene. This timing does not coincide with the similar diversification shifts in the other taxa.

Other areas of investigation might also be biased by clock model mis-specification. For example, vicariance hypotheses for the origins of the New Caledonian biota have been rejected after divergence times for multiple clades with sisters in other landmasses were found to be too young compared with geological separation [39]. Similarly, claims that New Zealand drowned completely during the Oligocene have gained support from clade-age estimates that post-date the geological emergence of the islands as subaerial land [40]. The age of any such clades that were broom-shaped and dated using UCLN should be reassessed using RLC and marginal likelihood model comparisons.

Conclusion

We have shown that large dating errors can result from the UCLN clock model (compared with RLC) if its assumptions are violated. Neither clock is necessarily superior in general: model choice should be contingent upon how well a given dataset meets its assumptions. In datasets with clade-specific substitution rates, the RLC model provides a significantly more accurate approach than the UCLN model, especially in long-branch clades that lack calibrations. We found significant differences in age estimates using these models with such datasets, whether simulated or empirical (Xanthorrhoea). In simulated rate-heterogeneous phylogenies with a slowly evolving “broom” clade, the uncorrelated clocks model always significantly underestimated the true age of the broom crown, whereas the random local clocks model consistently succeeded. UCLN likely underestimates the age of uncalibrated broom clades because the uncorrelated model is poor at detecting rate shifts [9]. Calibration of the broom can reduce this dating error but it does not correct model mis-specification [9]. Therefore, it is important to compare the suitability of both models by using a priori criteria (e.g., life history, relative-rates test, branch length variation in a phylogram) or a posteriori marginal likelihood tests. More extensive studies of clock models are needed to determine their applicability to different kinds of datasets [10]. For instance, local clocks and autocorrelated clocks are similar in principle but differ in the number of rate shifts allowed and we did not compare these clocks in this study.

In analyses of Xanthorrhoea, the two clock models led to very different conclusions about the evolution of the genus: rapid diversification with severe aridification in the Pliocene/Pleistocene (UCLN) or diversification following the onset of global cooling and drying in the Miocene (RLC). Life history traits of Xanthorrhoea suggested that the substitution rate might be slower than in its sister groups, and use of the RLC clock was supported by relative rate testing and marginal likelihood tests. The older crown age (24–35 Ma) estimated for Xanthorrhoea by the preferred RLC model is consistent with re-diversification following the end-Eocene extinctions, as inferred in co-occurring taxa and attributed to global climate change.

A challenge for the future will be to determine the timing of substitution rate shifts more accurately because uncertainty can severely affect dating. Currently, resolution of this uncertainty requires independent evidence, such as fossil-based calibration at critical nodes, e.g. in broom clades.

Methods

In order to develop a biologically realistic simulation, we first analyzed the Xanthorrhoeaceae dataset so that we could use it as a basis for choosing parameter values. The methods used for the empirical data analyses are described after those of the simulations.

Simulations of strong among-clade substitution rate variation

To test the accuracy of the RLC and UCLN models in retrieving the known age of an uncalibrated crown node with a long stem, we simulated data with parameters that reflected the critically relevant properties of the Xanthorrhoeaceae dataset.

All simulations were performed in the R software environment [41]. Using the R package TESS [42], we simulated 100 ultrametric trees under a Birth-death model of phylogenetic branching (i.e., a stochastic, equal rates Markov model with speciation and extinction rate parameters). The distribution of branch lengths across the simulated trees was a function of the specified speciation and extinction rates. Each tree was composed of two primary clades: a “broom” clade [1] with a long stem (45–25 Ma) and recent crown (25 Ma), and a “bush” clade with a short stem (45–40 Ma) and old crown (40 Ma). From this set of 100 trees, we chose 10 with fewer than 50 terminal branches in total, and with the proportion of branches in each clade varying among trees (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Next, using the R package PhyloSim [43], we simulated the evolution of a 1 Kb DNA data set over each of these trees. We used a GTR + Γ model of substitution, with the alpha parameter set to 1. In the commonly used Markov model of DNA evolution, substitution rates are modelled with parameters denoting the probability of particular kinds of substitution over an infinitesimal time interval – the higher the probability of a substitution, the more frequently it occurs. In our simulations, we used a base GTR model with the following parameters: μTC = 1, μTA = 2, μTG = 3, μCA = 1, μCG = 2, and μAG = 3. Base frequencies were set to T = C = 0.667 and A = G = 0.333. The scaling parameter on the Q matrix was an order of magnitude slower in the broom clade (0.001) than in the bush clade (0.01); this ratio was close to what we estimated from the empirical data. Thus, for μAG, the substitution probability in the broom clade was 3 × 0.001 = 0.003, conditioned on base frequencies and the Γ distribution of among-site rate heterogeneity.

Phylogenetic divergence times were estimated using BEAST v1.8.0 for each simulated DNA dataset under RLC and UCLN models of among-lineage substitution rate variation, and under Birth-death and Yule phylogenetic tree models. Each estimate assumed a general time-reversible plus Gamma (GTR + Γ) substitution model and used three log-normal stem-node age priors: one was placed at the stem-node of the broom clade and two were placed at the stem-nodes of each of two clades internal to the bush clade (to match the real data). The mean and offset of each calibration prior were equal to half the distance between the crown and stem nodes of the respective clade (Figure 1). MCMC analyses were run in BEAST for 50 to 200 M generations, sampling parameters and trees every 20 K generations. Parameter traces were viewed in Tracer v1.6 [44] to determine when each analysis began to sample from the stationary distribution. Trees sampled before stationarity had been reached (burnin) were discarded. Bayes factors [27] calculated from the marginal likelihoods using path sampling and stepping-stone sampling [45],[46] were used to evaluate the fit of RLC and UCLN models to each simulated dataset. All R scripts, simulated trees, and BEAST xml files and annotated maximum clade credibility trees are provided as Appendix 1 in [47].

Xanthorrhoeaceae: sampling, DNA sequencing and alignment

Of the 28 named species of Xanthorrhoea [48], we sampled 25 with at least one accession, plus outgroups representing the other two subfamilies of Xanthorrhoeaceae and some outgroups from Asparagales (Appendices 2–3 in [47]). Vouchers are lodged at the Australian National Herbarium (CANB).

Genomic DNA was extracted from silica-gel-dried leaf tissue using a DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was conducted using 25μl reaction volumes containing 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 μM primer, 0.75 units PlatinumTaq (Invitrogen) and 2μl of the template DNA. The DNA regions amplified were from the chloroplast (ndhF and trnL-trnF; “Xanthorrhoeaceae-cpDNA” dataset) and nuclear rpb2 (“Xanthorrhoeaceae-rpb2” dataset). We sometimes refer to these two datasets collectively as the “Xanthorrhoeaceae-only” datasets. The primers used for amplification were 1252f and Mel-r1 [49] for ndhF, trnL-F c and trnL-F f [50] for trnL-trnF, and P7F [51] with ex22r [49] for rpb2. The resulting products were sequenced in both directions using ABI Big Dye 3.1 chemistry on an ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Sequences obtained were edited using Sequencher 4.5 (GeneCodes), aligned initially using MAFFT [52] in CIPRES [53] and manually adjusted in Se-Al v2.0a11 [54].

Direct sequencing of many of the nuclear rpb2 fragments revealed the presence of polymorphic sites and indels that confounded unequivocal reading of the sequence. To isolate individual copies from these polymorphic sequences the PCR products were run out on 2% TAE agarose gel, excised and then purified using BRESAclean/Mobio Quickclean 300 kit (GeneWorks). The purified products were then cloned using the pGEM-T Vector System II (Promega) with the manufacturer’s protocol at 1/8th volume. Individual colonies were amplified by PCR using the same protocol as with the original rpb2 products. Five colonies per original product were sequenced and these were used to compare with the original “parental” sequence to attempt to distinguish between substitutions resulting from Taq error and those that were suspected polymorphic bases in the parent sequence (see [49] for a discussion of this procedure).

Within Xanthorrhoea, there were only 12 cpDNA haplotypes, i.e., multiple individuals and species shared identical haplotypes, and the dataset was pruned to a single terminal per haplotype for the analyses. Cloning of rpb2 yielded many more unique haplotypes than species but did not appear to comprise multiple loci predating the origin of Xanthorrhoea because the genus was monophyletic. If locus duplications had predated divergence of Xanthorrhoea from its sister group(s), then we would expect to see two or more subtrees (representing the duplicated loci), each including Xanthorrhoea and any sister group that also inherited both copies of the duplicated locus, i.e. Xanthorrhoea would appear paraphyletic [55]. We rarefied the rpb2 haplotype sample to minimise the node density artefact in substitution rate modelling [56] because not all species were sampled in the other subfamilies. In the rarefied sample, we represented the diversity both of species and of putative paralogs by sampling from all deeper-level clades. Analyses using both the full and rarefied datasets were compared and, as the results did not differ, usually only those from the rarefied data are reported here. Even after rarefaction, species-level sampling was greater in Xanthorrhoea than in the sister groups. This makes our hypothesis test conservative because the node density artefact tends to inflate the estimate of molecular evolutionary rate in lineages with more nodes [56]; thus, our estimates of rates in Xanthorrhoea are likely to err on the high side, relative to the less well-sampled sister groups.

As there is no fossil-based calibration available for the Xanthorrhoeaceae crown node, we made a robust age estimate to use as a prior in our dating analyses within the family. We created a third dataset (“Monocots-cpDNA”) of sequences downloaded from Genbank of the cpDNA regions that we have sequenced for species of Xanthorrhoea (ndhF and trnL-trnF) for 125 taxa representing all major clades within monocots (Appendices 2–3 in [47]), including Acorus for the root [37], and aligned these with the sequences obtained in this study.

Xanthorrhoeaceae: phylogenetics and relaxed molecular clock dating

Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using maximum likelihood with a general time-reversible (GTR) + Γ model implemented in RAxML ver. 7.4.2 [57] on CIPRES [53]. DNA sequences were partitioned with separate substitution models set for the exons of ndhF and rpb2 (SRD06 model) and for the noncoding regions (introns and spacers combined) of each locus (cpDNA and rpb2/nDNA).

Time-calibrated phylogenies were inferred using BEAST v1.8.0 [58] with uncorrelated lognormal (UCLN) and random local clocks (RLC) clock models. Each partition (defined as above) was given a separate clock model. For comparison, two phylogenetic branching models were used: a calibrated Yule model [59] and a Birth-death model with incomplete sampling [60]. Both partitioned and non-partitioned models were run as described above for the RAxML analyses. Relative fit of the alternative models for sequence partitioning, tree priors and clock models was evaluated using marginal likelihoods obtained by path sampling and stepping-stone sampling [45],[46] to calculate Bayes factors [27]. To ensure stationarity and convergence of the Bayesian MCMC chains, two or more parallel runs were made and Tracer v1.6 [44] used to check that the post-burn-in effective sample sizes in the combined logs were > 200 for all parameters. Run length was a minimum of 100 million generations and was increased up to 300 million if needed to achieve stationarity and convergence. To display the results, maximum clade credibility trees were annotated in FigTree v1.4.0 [61], as recommended by the author.

Xanthorrhoeaceae: calibration

The crown node of monocots (MRCA of Acorus and the rest), and its daughter node (Alismatales vs the rest) were constrained with normal priors (respectively, mean = 145 Ma, SD = 1.0 and mean = 134 Ma, SD = 1.0), that encompass two very similar age estimates [62],[63] for these nodes (nodes 1–2 in Additional file 3: Figure S2). These secondary calibrations were given normally distributed priors, whereas the following fossil-based calibrations were given lognormal priors, as recommended in each case [6]. The MRCA of Spathiphyllum, Monstera and Arisaema (Araceae, node 3) was constrained with an offset (minimum age) = 115 Ma and SD = 1.0), based on the co-occurrence of diagnostic fossil pollens of Spathiphyllum and Monstereae in Portugal [64]. Although the optimal location of these fossils on the phylogeny remains uncertain [65],[66], our placement is within the likely range accepted by these authors. A constraint at the MRCA of palms (node 4: offset = 85.8, SD = 1.0) was derived from the earliest known palm fossil Sabalites carolinensis [67]. The stem node of Poales (node 5: offset 115 = Ma, SD = 1.0) was constrained based on the earliest known fossils of Poales [68] and a similar secondary estimate [69]. Calibration of node 6 (offset = 45.0, SD = 1.0) was placed at the MRCA of Dianella and Phormium (“phormioid” clade), which share leaves that are isobifacial and equitant immediately above the sheath but distally become dorsiventrally flattened, whereas Pasithea, sister to this clade, lacks an isobifacial zone [37]. The clade was calibrated with an Eocene-age Dianella-like fossil [70]. In the analyses of the smaller, Xanthorrhoeaceae-only datasets, the root (= crown node of the family) was given a normal prior of 71.2 (SD = 1.0), being the midpoint of the range of mean estimates (68–74) from the BEAST analyses of the larger (monocots) dataset (Table 2).

Have substitution rates slowed in Xanthorrhoea?

Substitution rates were compared across Xanthorrhoea and its outgroups, using the relative rates test, local clock permutation test, and rate estimates from the BEAST posteriors.

We first used the standard relative-rates test [71] to assess whether the substitution rate in Xanthorrhoea is significantly different from that in the rest of the family. This test has the advantage of simplicity: it does not assume a phylogeny and makes pairwise comparisons of sequence dissimilarities between two groups (Xanthorrhoea and the other subfamilies) and an outgroup (Lomandra confertiflora and L. glauca from Asparagaceae) to assess whether the two sets of dissimilarities are significantly different. We used both the other subfamilies simultaneously for the rate comparisons with Xanthorrhoea for the following reasons. Xanthorrhoeaceae comprises three clades, which are Xanthorrhoea (= subfam. Xanthorrhoeoideae) and its two ister groups, subfamilies Hemerocallidoideae and Asphodeloideae. Monophyly of the family and of each subfamily is well supported by our analyses of cpDNA across all monocots (Additional file 3: Figures S2 and S3) and by other recent studies [28]-[30]. However, the relationship among the subfamilies has been uncertain (reviewed in [37]), though all the above analyses have favoured (Asphodeloideae, (Hemerocallidoideae, Xanthorrhoeoideae)). This result was also obtained from the Xanthorrhoeaceae-rpb2 dataset (Additional file 3: Figure S4) but in the Xanthorrhoeaceae-cpDNA dataset Xanthorrhoea was sister to Asphodeloideae (Additional file 3: Figure S5).

We implemented the relative rates test using uncorrected proportional distance (“p-distance”) as the dissimilarity measure to compare all ingroup-outgroup sequence pairs. The standard test uses a likelihood ratio test based on the variances of the two sets of pairwise distances [71] but is problematic because it can return a significant difference that reflects rate variation within lineages (groups) alone [26]. We avoided this problem using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test [72], which makes no assumption about variance, and simply tests the null hypothesis that one set of distances (from group 1 to the outgroup) is stochastically neither larger nor smaller than the other set (from group 2 to the outgroup). Four tests were done using each locus (cpDNA and rpb2) in turn, and with each outgroup (Lomandra species) in turn.

We alternatively used the local-clock permutation test [26], which is phylogeny-based, unlike the relative rates test. The local-clock permutation test calculates the log likelihood difference (Δ) between a single (global) clock model and a local (within-lineage) clocks model for comparison with a null distribution generated by randomising the tips across the lineages [26]. If Δ calculated from the original (unpermuted) data is significantly greater than that calculated from the permuted data (i.e., falls outside the 5% tail of the null distribution), then the null hypothesis of a single global clock is rejected. We implemented this test using the protocol and scripts developed by [26] in combination with PAML 4.4b 71], with 1000 permutations, as recommended. We tested the rpb2 and cpDNA datasets separately.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are available in the Dryad repository, http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d1nb6

Additional files

Abbreviations

UCLN: 

Uncorrelated lognormal molecular clock model

RLC: 

Random local clocks model

BCI: 

Bayesian confidence interval

GTR + Γ: 

General Time Reversible plus Gamma (DNA substitution model)

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Some of the DNA sequencing and editing was done at ANU by David Morris. Alicia Toon checked and uploaded the sequences to GenBank. We thank Rob Lanfear for helpful discussion and two reviewers for their useful suggestions for improving the manuscript. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery grants to MC and LC numbered DP0985473 and DP130101141.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research School of Biology, The Australian National University
(2)
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University
(3)
The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences

References

  1. Crisp MD, Cook LG: Explosive radiation or mass extinction? Interpreting signatures in molecular phylogenies. Evolution. 2009, 63: 2257-2265. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00728.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Magallon S: Using fossils to break long branches in molecular dating: a comparison of relaxed clocks applied to the origin of Angiosperms. Syst Biol. 2010, 59: 384-399. 10.1093/sysbio/syq027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Crisp MD, Cook LG: Cenozoic extinctions account for low diversity of extant gymnosperms compared with angiosperms. New Phytol. 2011, 192: 997-1009. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03862.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sanderson MJ, Doyle JA: Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data. Am J Bot. 2001, 88: 1499-1516. 10.2307/3558458.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Benton MJ, Donoghue PCJ: Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 26-53. 10.1093/molbev/msl150.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ho SYW, Phillips MJ: Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst Biol. 2009, 58: 367-380. 10.1093/sysbio/syp035.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sauquet H, Ho SYW, Gandolfo MA, Jordan GJ, Wilf P, Cantrill DJ, Bayly MJ, Bromham L, Brown GK, Carpenter RJ, Lee DM, Murphy DJ, Sniderman K, Udovicic F: Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales). Syst Biol. 2012, 61: 289-313. 10.1093/sysbio/syr116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Thornhill AH, Popple LW, Carter RJ, Ho SY, Crisp MD: Are pollen fossils useful for calibrating relaxed molecular clock dating of phylogenies? A comparative study using Myrtaceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012, 63: 15-17. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dornburg A, Brandley MC, McGowen MR, Near TJ: Relaxed clocks and inferences of heterogeneous patterns of nucleotide substitution and divergence time estimates across whales and dolphins (Mammalia: Cetacea). Mol Biol Evol. 2012, 29: 721-736. 10.1093/molbev/msr228.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ho SYW, Duchêne S: Molecular-clock methods for estimating evolutionary rates and timescales. Mol Ecol 2014, doi:10.1111/mec.12953.,Google Scholar
  11. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A: Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e88-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Linder M, Britton T, Sennblad B: Evaluation of Bayesian models of substitution rate evolution – parental guidance versus mutual independence. Syst Biol. 2011, 60: 329-342. 10.1093/sysbio/syr009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lepage T, Bryant D, Philippe H, Lartillot N: A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 2669-2680. 10.1093/molbev/msm193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Guindon S: From trajectories to averages: an improved description of the heterogeneity of substitution rates along lineages. Syst Biol. 2013, 62: 22-34. 10.1093/sysbio/sys063.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA: Bayesian random local clocks, or one rate to rule them all. BMC Biol. 2010, 8: 114-10.1186/1741-7007-8-114.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Muse SV: Examining rates and patterns of nucleotide substitution in plants. Pl Mol Biol. 2000, 42: 25-43. 10.1023/A:1006319803002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bromham L: Why do species vary in their rate of molecular evolution?. Biol Lett. 2009, 5: 401-404. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0136.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaut B, Yang L, Takuno S, Eguiarte LE: The patterns and causes of variation in plant nucleotide substitution rates. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2011, 42: 245-266. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin AP, Palumbi SR: Body size, metabolic rate, generation time and the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 4087-4091. 10.1073/pnas.90.9.4087.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanfear R, Ho SYW, Davies TJ, Moles AT, Aarssen L, Swenson NG, Warman L, Zanne A, Allen AP: Taller plants have lower rates of molecular evolution. Nat Commun. 2013, 4: 1-7. 10.1038/ncomms2836.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamont BB, Wittkuhn R, Korczynskyj D: Ecology and ecophysiology of grasstrees. Aust J Bot. 2004, 52: 561-582. 10.1071/BT03127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. King R, Zalucki JM: Potential inbreeding in a small population of a mass flowering species, Xanthorrhoea johnsonii (Xanthorrhoeaceae): Is your mother my father?. Am J Pl Sci. 2012, 3: 303-312. 10.4236/ajps.2012.33036.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamont BB, Downes KS: Fire-stimulated flowering among resprouters and geophytes in Australia and South Africa. Pl Ecol. 2011, 212: 2111-2125. 10.1007/s11258-011-9987-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bradstock RA: A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future implications. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2010, 19: 145-158. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00512.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang Z: Molecular clock. Oxford Encyclopedia of Evolution. Edited by: Pagel M. 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 747-750.Google Scholar
  26. Lanfear R: The local-clock permutation test: a simple test to compare rates of molecular evolution on phylogenetic trees. Evolution. 2011, 2: 606-611. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01160.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Raftery AE: Approximate Bayes factors and accounting for model uncertainty in generalised linear models. Biometrika. 1996, 83: 251-266. 10.1093/biomet/83.2.251.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim JH, Kim DK, Forest F, Fay MF, Chase MW: Molecular phylogenetics of Ruscaceae sensu lato and related families (Asparagales) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. Ann Bot. 2010, 106: 775-790. 10.1093/aob/mcq167.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Seberg O, Petersen G, Davis JI, Pires JC, Stevenson DW, Chase MW, Fay MF, Devey DS, Jorgensen T, Sytsma KJ, Pillon Y: Phylogeny of the Asparagales based on three plastid and two mitochondrial genes. Am J Bot. 2012, 99: 875-889. 10.3732/ajb.1100468.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Steele PR, Hertweck KL, Mayfield D, McKain MR, Leebens-Mack J, Pires JC: Quality and quantity of data recovered from massively parallel sequencing: examples in Asparagales and Poaceae. Am J Bot. 2012, 99: 330-348. 10.3732/ajb.1100491.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolfe KH, Li WH, Sharp PM: Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987, 84: 9054-9058. 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaut BS: Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rates in higher plants. Evol Biol. 1998, 30: 93-120. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1751-5_4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rabosky DL: Extinction rates should not be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Evolution. 2010, 64: 1816-1824. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00926.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Stadler T: Recovering speciation and extinction dynamics based on phylogenies. J Evol Biol. 2013, 26: 1203-1219. 10.1111/jeb.12139.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bousquet J, Strauss SH, Doerksen AH, Price RA: Extensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene-sequences among seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 7844-7848. 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7844.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Webster AJ, Payne RJH, Pagel M: Molecular phylogenies link rates of evolution and speciation. Science. 2003, 301: 478-10.1126/science.1083202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevens PF: Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 13 [http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/]
  38. Crisp MD, Cook LG: How was the Australian flora assembled over the last 65 million years? A molecular phylogenetic perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2013, 44: 303-324. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135910.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Grandcolas P, Murienne J, Robillard T, Desutter-Grandcolas L, Jourdan H, Guilbert E, Deharveng L: New Caledonia: A very old Darwinian island?. Philos T R Soc B. 2008, 363: 3309-3317. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma PP, Wheeler WC: Revenant clades in historical biogeography: the geology of New Zealand predisposes endemic clades to root age shifts. J Biogeog. 2013, 40: 1609-1618. 10.1111/jbi.12112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. The R Project for Statistical Computing [http://www.r-project.org/]
  42. Höhna S: Fast simulation of reconstructed phylogenies under global time-dependent birth–death processes. Bioinformatics. 2013, 29: 1367-1374. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sipos B, Massingham T, Jordan GE, Goldman N: PhyloSim - Monte Carlo simulation of sequence evolution in the R statistical computing environment. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12: 104-10.1186/1471-2105-12-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Drummond A: Tracer v1.6. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/; 2013.
  45. Baele G, Lemey P, Bedford T, Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Alekseyenko AV: Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty. Mol Biol Evol. 2012, 29: 2157-2167. 10.1093/molbev/mss084.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Baele G, Li WLS, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Lemey P: Accurate model selection of relaxed molecular clocks in Bayesian phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol. 2013, 30: 239-243. 10.1093/molbev/mss243.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Crisp MD, Hardy NB, Cook LG: Clock model makes a large difference to age estimates of long-stemmed clades with no internal calibration: a test using Australian grasstrees. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d1nb6,
  48. Bedford DJ: Xanthorrhoea. Flora of Australia. Volume 46: Iridaceae to Dioscoreaceae. Edited by: George AS. 1986, Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  49. Cook LG, Morris DC, Edwards RD, Crisp MD: Reticulate evolution in the natural range of the invasive wetland tree species Melaleuca quinquenervia. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 47: 506-522. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.02.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J: Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl Mol Biol. 1991, 17: 1105-1109. 10.1007/BF00037152.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Denton AL, McConaughy BL, Hall BD: Usefulness of RNA polymerase II coding sequences for estimation of green plant phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 1998, 15: 1082-1085. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Katoh K, Toh H: Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 1899-1900. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T: Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE): 14 Nov 2010; New Orleans. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2010:1–8Google Scholar
  54. Rambaut A: Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/; 1996
  55. Doyle JJ: Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst Bot. 1992, 17: 144-163. 10.2307/2419070.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Hugall AF, Lee MSY: The likelihood node density effect and consequences for evolutionary studies of molecular rates. Evolution. 2007, 61: 2293-2307. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00188.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J: A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 2008, 57: 758-771. 10.1080/10635150802429642.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A: Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012, 29: 1969-1973. 10.1093/molbev/mss075.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Heled J, Drummond AJ: Calibrated tree priors for relaxed phylogenetics and divergence time estimation. Syst Biol. 2012, 61: 138-149. 10.1093/sysbio/syr087.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Stadler T: On incomplete sampling under birth-death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent. J Theoret Biol. 2009, 261: 58-66. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Rambaut A: FigTree v1.4.0. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/; 2012.
  62. Janssen T, Bremer K: The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800+ rbcL sequences. Bot J Linn Soc. 2004, 146: 385-398. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00345.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Bell CD, Soltis DE, Soltis PS: The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am J Bot. 2010, 97: 1296-1303. 10.3732/ajb.0900346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR: Araceae from the early cretaceous of Portugal: Evidence on the emergence of monocotyledons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 16565-16570. 10.1073/pnas.0407174101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR: Diversity in obscurity: fossil flowers and the early history of angiosperms. Philos T R Soc B. 2010, 365: 369-382. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Nauheimer L, Metzler D, Renner SS: Global history of the ancient monocot family Araceae inferred with models accounting for past continental positions and previous ranges based on fossils. New Phytol. 2012, 195: 938-950. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04220.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Couvreur T, Forest F, Baker W: Origin and global diversification patterns of tropical rain forests: inferences from a complete genus-level phylogeny of palms. BMC Biol. 2011, 9: 44-10.1186/1741-7007-9-44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Herendeen PS, Crane PR: The fossil history of the monocotyledons. Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution. Edited by: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ. 1995, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, 1-21.Google Scholar
  69. Zhong B, Yonezawa T, Zhong Y, Hasegawa M: Episodic evolution and adaptation of chloroplast genomes in ancestral grasses. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e5297-10.1371/journal.pone.0005297.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Conran JG, Christophel DC, Cunningham L: An Eocene monocotyledon from Nelly Creek, Central Australia, with affinities to Hemerocallidaceae (Lilianae: Asparagales). Alcheringa. 2003, 27: 107-115. 10.1080/03115510308619551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Yang Z: PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1586-1591. 10.1093/molbev/msm088.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Siegel S, Castellan NJ: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Crisp et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.