Skip to main content

Table 2 AICc and BIC scores for every partitioning scheme selected for each dataset

From: Automatic selection of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses using iterative k-means clustering of site rates

Dataset name

No partitioning

User

Greedy

TIGER site rates

Likelihood site rates

AICc

Anderson 2014

36721

34972

34972

32584

28681

Cognato 2001

39373

37172

37172

36262

32216

Grande 2013

111819

108501

108501

105300

96616

Kang 2013

34157

33699

33682

30091

19490

Kawahara 2013

32238

29940

29940

28385

23488

Kjer 2007

1120392

1075872

1075749

1059594

1008180

Leavitt 2013

445052

423826

423389

410220

371585

McCormack 2013

972461

963551

961143

828180

690645

Oaks 2011

80550

74814

74686

69278

58947

Sharanowski 2011

218188

213696

213696

211251

198268

BIC

Anderson 2014

38444

36820

36820

34590

30649

Cognato 2001

39890

38067

38056

37168

32701

Grande 2013

112673

109862

109741

107929

100751

Kang 2013

34578

34650

34364

31617

30448

Kawahara 2013

33057

31052

30989

29561

25020

Kjer 2007

1121793

1081392

1079270

1065998

1020447

Leavitt 2013

445625

429638

425574

413343

379692

McCormack 2013

973122

992389

967479

830140

748946

Oaks 2011

81673

77190

76316

71117

58988

Sharanowski 2011

219937

215953

215872

214802

202707