Open Access

Polyploidy versus endosymbionts in obligately thelytokous thrips

BMC Evolutionary Biology201515:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0304-6

Received: 1 November 2014

Accepted: 10 February 2015

Published: 22 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Thelytoky, the parthenogenetic development of females, has independently evolved in several insect orders yet the study of its mechanisms has so far mostly focussed on haplodiploid Hymenoptera, while alternative mechanisms of thelytoky such as polyploidy are far less understood. In haplodiploid insects, thelytoky can be encoded in their genomes, or induced by maternally inherited bacteria such as Wolbachia or Cardinium. Microbially facilitated thelytoky usually results in complete homozygosity due to gamete duplication and can be reverted into arrhenotoky, the parthenogenetic development of males, through treatment with antibiotics. In contrast, genetically encoded thelytoky cannot be removed and may result in conservation of heterozygosity due to gamete fusion. We have probed the obligate thelytoky of the greenhouse thrips, Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché), a significant cosmopolitan pest and a model species of thelytoky in the haplodiploid insect order Thysanoptera. Earlier studies suggested terminal fusion as a mechanism for thelytoky in this species, while another study reported presence of Wolbachia; later it was speculated that Wolbachia plays a role in this thrips’ thelytokous reproduction.

Results

By using PCR and sequence analysis, we demonstrated that global population samples of H. haemorrhoidalis were not infected with Wolbachia, Cardinium or any other known bacterial reproductive manipulators. Antibiotic treatment of this thrips did also not result in male production. Some individuals carried two different alleles in two nuclear loci, histone 3 and elongation factor 1 alpha, suggesting heterozygosity. However, the majority of individuals had three different alleles suggesting that they were polyploid. Genetic diversity across both nuclear loci was low in all populations, and absent from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I, indicating that this species had experienced genetic bottlenecks, perhaps due to its invasion biology or a switch to thelytoky.

Conclusions

Geographically broad sampling and experimental manipulation revealed low genetic diversity, absence of Wolbachia but presence of three different alleles of nuclear loci in most analysed individuals of obligately thelytokous H. haemorrhoidalis. This suggests that polyploidy may be involved in the thelytokous reproduction of this thrips species, and polyploidy may be a contributing factor in the reproduction of Thysanoptera and other haplodiploid insect orders.

Keywords

Haplodiploidy Thelytoky Heterozygosity Polyploidy Hexaploidy Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis Thysanoptera Wolbachia histone 3

Background

Thelytoky, or the parthenogenetic development of females from unfertilised eggs, has mostly been studied in species of insect orders with haplodiploid sex determination systems such as Hymenoptera [1]. Most haplodiploid species display arrhenotoky, where unfertilised eggs develop into haploid males and fertilised eggs into diploid females; in thelytoky diploid females develop from unfertilised eggs [1,2]. In a number of insect orders thelytoky can also be linked with polyploidy; however, polyploidy is considered rare, with most reports from within the order Coleoptera [3].

Thelytoky can either be obligate or facultative [4]; males are generally absent in obligately thelytokous populations, with the exception of the rare production of males [1]. Apomixis is thelytoky that occurs without meiosis; it results in offspring that are identical copies of the maternal genetic makeup. In contrast, automixis includes meiosis with one of at least three different avenues of diploidy restoration [1,2]. In gamete duplication, the diploidisation is accomplished by the duplication of the haploid genome of single nuclei after the second meiotic division, and hence results in homozygosity. In terminal fusion, the egg nucleus and second polar body fuse after the second meiotic division to give rise to the embryo, while in central fusion two polar bodies fuse to form the cell from which the embryo is derived [4]. Central fusion can maintain or progressively erode heterozygosity, with a transition rate of a heterozygous locus to homozygosity of 0 (without recombination) or 1/3 (with recombination and at loci distant enough from the centromere), respectively. In contrast, terminal fusion enforces homozygosity, with a transition rate of a heterozygous locus to homozygosity of 1 (without recombination) or 1/3 (with recombination and loci distant enough from the centromere) [1,5].

Thelytokous parthenogenesis can be encoded in arthropod genomes or can be induced by inherited microbial endosymbionts. The majority of endosymbiont-induced thelytoky is automixis with gamete duplication [1,6], except for bacterially facilitated apomictic thelytoky that was recorded in Rickettsia-infected Neochrysocharis formosa parasitoids [7] and Wolbachia-infected phytophagous Bryobia praetiosa mites [8]. The most common endosymbiont that induces thelytoky is Wolbachia, a ubiquitous maternally inherited intracellular bacterium of arthropods [9]. Wolbachia was first found to induce thelytoky in Trichogramma wasps [10]. After removal by antibiotic treatment and exposure to high temperatures, thelytoky was converted into arrhenotoky [10]. Subsequently, Wolbachia was confirmed to induce parthenogenesis in mites, springtails and a number of insect orders, in particular in Hymenoptera [6,11]. In Thysanoptera, Wolbachia was also found to cause thelytokous parthenogenesis in Hercinothrips femoralis [12] and Franklinothrips vespiformis [13]. In addition to Wolbachia, other bacterial endosymbionts including Cardinium [14-18] and Rickettsia [7,19-21] also cause thelytoky in arthropods other than thrips.

Thysanoptera is an insect order of over 6,000 recognised species [22] in which haplodiploidy has independently evolved [23,24]. Thelytoky occurs in a number of thrips species, however, it is far less studied in this order than in Hymenoptera. The greenhouse thrips, Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), an economically important pest of numerous crops worldwide, is obligately thelytokous [25]. Males are absent from laboratory and most field populations. Yet, exceptional males have been found, mostly in South America [26,27]. The incidence of males in South America, especially Brazil and Peru, plus the discovery of two closely related species Heliothrips sylvanus and Heliothrips zucchi in this biogeographic region indicates that H. haemorrhoidalis is native to the Amazon basin [26].

Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis is one of the first thrips species for which cytological mechanisms of thelytoky have been studied [28]. Bournier [29] described the thelytokous parthenogenesis in H. haemorrhoidalis as automictic parthenogenesis; meiosis was observed as the chromosome number was reduced from 42 to 21 during oocyte formation, followed by the re-establishment of 42 chromosomes through fusion of the second polar body with the egg nucleus. According to these results, Bell [30] and Suomalainen et al. [4] concluded that thelytoky in H. haemorrhoidalis was automixis through terminal fusion. Later, this species tested positive for Wolbachia by PCR using Wolbachia specific primers for the cell cycle ftsZ gene [31]. However, these positive PCR products were not sequenced nor confirmed, and the potential role of Wolbachia in the thelytokous reproduction of this species was not tested further through antibiotic treatment. In the absence of adequate confirmation of these previous results, a number of papers suggested a role of Wolbachia in thelytoky of this thrips species [11,12,32-34].

In our study, we tested thelytokous H. haemorrhoidalis collected from Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe and South America for Wolbachia and other potential parthenogenesis-inducing bacterial endosymbionts such as Cardinium by using PCR and DNA sequence analysis. We also treated one Australian H. haemorrhoidalis laboratory population with antibiotics in order to test whether thelytokous reproduction of this species could be reverted to arrhenotoky. We then analysed the genetic and allelic diversity of individuals in one mitochondrial and two nuclear loci, in particular to assess whether individuals are homozygous, heterozygous or polyploid. We hypothesised that homozygosity in nuclear loci would indicate gamete duplication (as commonly seen in endosymbiont-facilitated thelytoky) or terminal fusion, while heterozygosity could indicate central fusion. More than two nuclear alleles per individual would indicate polyploidy. We also aimed to characterise the genetic identity and diversity of cosmopolitan populations as limited genetic information had been available for this invasive thrips species prior to our study.

Methods

Thrips collection and cultures

Our study included specimens of six H. haemorrhoidalis populations that were field sampled from Australia, Chile, Japan, South Africa, Spain and United Kingdom (Additional file 1: Table S1) and from three laboratory populations, established from individuals collected in Richmond (New South Wales, Australia) in 1995 [35], Canberra (Australian Capital Territory) in 2011, and Te Puke (New Zealand) in 2013. The two Australian laboratory populations were maintained on citrus fruits [36]. Individuals were reared in plastic boxes (25 × 17 × 20 cm) with a lid that had a thrips-proof mesh (mesh aperture 160 × 160 μm). About 15–20 insecticide-free large, green and unripe oranges (Citrus × aurantium L. ‘Washington navel’) harvested from orchards on the UWS Hawkesbury campus were washed under tap water to remove any insects, dried with paper towel and placed tightly in each box together with approximately 100 thrips individuals. Each generation was left undisturbed for three weeks. Every three weeks, old and deteriorated fruits were removed and replaced with fresh fruits. The two Australian laboratory populations were reared in separate boxes that were kept at room conditions (22 ± 2°C) in different laboratories in order to avoid cross contamination. Morphological characters of thrips specimens were examined to confirm their identity, following Mound and Monteiro [27] and Mound et al. [37].

As sequences of the analysed elongation factor 1α (EF1a) gene region from other thrips species were not available on GenBank, we also included individuals of Frankliniella occidentalis, Pezothrips kellyanus, Thrips tabaci and Thrips imaginis (Additional file 1: Table S1).

DNA extraction

For the characterization of mitochondrial and nuclear markers we analysed individuals while the screening for Wolbachia included extracts from both, individuals and pooled individuals. DNA was extracted from individual adults, or pools of five, ten, or 20 larvae, pupae or adults using GenElute™ Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA). Extraction steps were undertaken following the protocols of the manufacturer, apart from the DNA elution step, where all samples were eluted with 50 μL elution solution. Prior to DNA extraction, the sample preparation process included surface sterilization, using the methods described by Hail et al. [38] to avoid contamination with environmental bacteria. First, samples were dipped in absolute ethanol for 1 min, then in sodium hypochlorite solution (reagent grade, available chlorine 10-15%; Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. Finally, the samples were rinsed in ultrapure-filtered distilled water for 1-2 min. The quality of extracted DNA was assessed through PCR amplifications of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene.

Screening of thrips for wolbachia and cardinium

A range of Wolbachia specific primer pairs for wsp [39], 16S rDNA [40,41] and five loci of the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) system [42]: ftsZ [43,44], gatB, coxA, hcpA and fpbA (Additional file 2: Table S2) were used to screen individuals for Wolbachia infections. In addition, we also tested primers and PCR conditions that had previously been evaluated by Simões et al. [45] to detect different Wolbachia strains in a wide range of hosts. Based on their results, we used the most sensitive primer pairs 553F_W and 1334R_W, WspecF and WspecR, and fpbA F1 and R1. To maximise detection of Wolbachia present at low titre [46], long PCR [47], and nested and semi-nested Wolbachia-specific PCR approaches targeting 16S rDNA, wsp and MLST loci (Additional file 3: Table S3) were also performed on Australian field and laboratory individuals. Extracts of Drosophila simulans (Riverside) infected with Wolbachia strain wRi and Drosophila melanogaster (W1118) infected with wMelPop were used as positive controls, while negative controls were tetracycline treated D. melanogaster (CST) as well as no-template controls. Samples were also screened for Cardinium using the primer pairs ChF and ChR [15,17], and CLOf1 and CLOr1 [48] (Additional file 2: Table S2). Encarsia perniciosi was used as positive control for Cardinium specific PCR assays [49]. PCR protocols were as listed in Additional file 4: Table S4 and Additional file 5: Table S5. PCR products were run in agarose gels (1%) stained with ethidium bromide at 90 V for 40 min and visualised by UV transillumination.

Characterisation of other bacterial symbionts

In order to detect other possible bacterial symbionts, the primer pairs 61F and 1227R, and 10F and 1507R [41] were used to amplify eubacterial 16S rDNA in individuals from the Chilean and two Australian (Richmond, Canberra) populations (Additional file 3: Table S3). Products obtained from these PCR reactions were cloned and sequenced. Column purified PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega) followed by transformation of JM109 High Efficiency Competent Cells (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. White colonies containing inserts were picked, transferred into 20 μl colourless 5× GoTaq reaction buffer (Promega), boiled at 98°C for 10 min, and 1 μl was used as template in colony PCR reactions using the SP6 and T7 promoter primers [50]. Colony PCR products were treated with 2 μl of ExoSAP mixture containing 0.5u Exonuclease I (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and 0.25u Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Promega), then incubated at 37°C for 30 min, followed by 95°C for 5 min [50]. The PCR products were then sent to Macrogen Korea for sequencing. PCR conditions, the number of sequenced clones, GenBank accession numbers and related information are included in Additional file 4: Table S4, Additional file 5: Table S5, Additional file 6: Table S6 and Additional file 7: Table S7.

Antibiotic treatments

Two experiments were undertaken in order to test whether thelytoky could be removed from H. haemorrhoidalis by antibiotic treatment. A first experiment established the response of adult thrips to two commonly used antibiotics, rifampicin and tetracycline hydrochloride at three concentrations (w/v): 0.5%, 2.5% and 5%. Antibiotic powder (Sigma-Aldrich) was mixed with 50% w/v Apis mellifera honey and distilled water; absorbent cotton wool soaked with this mixture was provided to newly emerged adult thrips for seven days. Thrips in the control treatment were provided with cotton wool soaked with honey-water solution only. Neutral red added to the antibiotic solution confirmed that the thrips drank the antibiotic solution, as after two days the thrips’ digestive tracts were coloured red. After treatment, ten survivors from each treatment were transferred as a cohort to clean Petri dishes (14 cm diameter) containing a Washington navel orange leaf as a food source and for oviposition. Mature leaves were harvested for the experiment to support oviposition by H. haemorrhoidalis based on its habit not to oviposit in fresh young leaves [51]. Harvested leaves were cleaned under tap water and dried with a paper towel. The leaves were kept fresh for several days by wrapping the petiole in absorbent cotton wool soaked with water. Every seven days, the thrips were transferred to new Petri dishes with a fresh leaf. Leaves from each week containing eggs were incubated separately to allow hatching of larvae. The number of offspring of treated females over a three-week period was recorded and all offspring were checked for presence of any males.

In a second experiment, both larvae and adults were treated with rifampicin (5% w/v) in order to extend the exposure time of thrips to antibiotics. Cotton wool soaked with rifampicin solution was provided to second instar H. haemorrhoidalis larvae for five days prior to their pupation. Adult thrips that developed from these treated larvae were fed on this solution for another five days. The soaked cotton wool was replaced with freshly prepared rifampicin honey-water solution every two days. Thrips in the control treatment were offered cotton wool soaked with honey-water without antibiotics. After treatment, 25 survivors were transferred individually to clean Petri dishes (14 cm diameter) containing an orange leaf as previously described. Every seven days, females were individually transferred to new Petri dishes with a fresh leaf. The leaves containing eggs from individual females were kept separately to rear their offspring. Eggs were collected over a three-week period. The number of offspring of individual females was recorded and the offspring were checked for presence of males. The experiment was conducted in an incubator at 25 ± 2°C, 70% relative humidity and 16:8 light/dark photoperiod. The numbers of offspring produced by females within the first, second and third week after treatment were compared using Independent-Samples T test in SPSS 21 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Sequencing of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers

A segment of the mitochondrial COI was amplified by PCR using the primer pair LCO1490 and HCO2198 [52]. PCR conditions were as described by Rugman-Jones et al. [53] (Additional file 4: Table S4 and Additional file 5: Table S5). PCR products obtained from three individual thrips collected from each of nine populations (Additional file 1: Table S1) were treated with the ExoSAP mixture and direct sequenced as described above.

Two nuclear gene fragments of H. haemorrhoidalis, histone H3 (~450 bp) and EF1a (~860 bp), were amplified. For H3, primers H3AF and H3AR were used [54]; and for EF1a of H. haemorrhoidalis, primers were modified from EF1aF [55] and rcM4 [56] while EF1aF and rcM4 were used to amplify this locus from all other thrips species. In order to investigate the heterozygosity and geographic variation in these loci, one individual thrips from each of eight H. haemorrhoidalis populations was selected (Additional file 1: Table S1). PCR conditions were as described in Additional file 4: Table S4 and Additional file 5: Table S5. Direct sequencing of the two nuclear genes resulted in ambiguous target sequences with multiple peaks. For this reason, the amplified PCR products were cloned prior to sequencing following the procedures described above. Colony PCR amplicons were treated with ExoSAP and submitted to sequencing by using the listed plasmid primers. For each individual, three to six clones were sequenced in order to obtain the individual’s allelic sequences.

Phylogenetic and sequence analyses

DNA sequences were assembled by Sequencher v4.10.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Michigan, USA) and the plasmid vector and primer sequences removed. Mitochondrial and nuclear protein-coding sequences were checked for open reading frames, stop codons or unexpected indels; this was to ensure that the target gene had been sequenced [57]. For COI, BLAST (NCBI, Maryland, USA) was employed to identify similar sequences from GenBank which were then included in the alignment calculated with Muscle in MEGA 5.2.2 [58]. Before constructing a phylogenetic tree, the reliability of alignments was checked by determining the average p-distances (<0.8) of the protein alignments [59]. The best evolution model for phylogenetic analyses was also tested, and phylogenetic trees of the entire sequence were constructed by Bayesian Inference using MrBayes v3.2.2 [60]. For H3 and EF1a, the intron splicing junctions were identified and compared to other insect species. It had been previously reported that cloning experiments would reveal PCR Taq DNA polymerase errors at the rate of 1:1000 bases [61], although the GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega) used in this experiment had a lower error rate [62]. In order to control for Taq DNA polymerase errors, we followed the approach for removing singletons described by Villablance et al. [61]. Finally, sequences were aligned with Muscle in MEGA 5.2.2 in order to identify the polymorphic sites. GenBank accession numbers of COI, H3 and EF1a sequences were represented in Additional file 7: Table S7.

Results

Analysis of bacterial symbionts of H. haemorrhoidalis

This study looked at 638 specimens from nine populations, including three laboratory populations from Australia and New Zealand, and six field populations from five different continents (Table 1). All specimens were sexed, and none was male. By using standard PCR on 16S rDNA, ftsZ, wsp and all MLST loci, Wolbachia was not detected in any DNA extract of 45 field specimens collected from Australia, Chile, Japan, South Africa, Spain and United Kingdom. Specimens of a New Zealand laboratory population (n = 10) were also negative for Wolbachia, and so were all 85 and 28 DNA extracts involving 543 and 40 Australian laboratory individuals from Richmond and Canberra, respectively, including all extracts from pooled specimens (Additional file 8: Table S8). Long PCR and nested PCR also revealed absence of infection in all Australian samples. Furthermore, we tested almost all Wolbachia primers that had previously been used for screening projects (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Additional file 3: Table S3), including the primer pair ftsZ102 FOR - ftsZ969 REV designed by Holden et al. [43] which was used for Wolbachia detection in H. haemorrhoidalis in the study by Pintureau et al. [31]. With this primer pair we obtained a single faint band at 55°C annealing temperature and a double band at 50°C annealing temperature for only one DNA extract of 10 pooled adult specimens from Richmond. These amplicons were excised from the gel, purified and cloned. Sequencing of cloned fragments did not result in Wolbachia sequences, so we concluded that those positive bands were artefacts produced by ftsZ primers on H. haemorrhoidalis extracts. In contrast, samples of positive controls, Drosophila simulans (Riverside) and Drosophila melanogaster (W1118) in all PCR assays resulted in strong positive bands at the expected size of Wolbachia.
Table 1

Number of DNA extracts of laboratory and field individuals tested for Cardinium and Wolbachia

#

Location

Cardinium

Wolbachia

n extracts

n individuals

n extracts

n individuals

Laboratory populations

 

32

50

123

593

1

Australia, NSW

16

34

85

543

2

Australia, ACT

6

6

28

40

3

New Zealand

10

10

10

10

Field populations

 

45

45

45

45

1

Australia, QLD

3

3

3

3

2

South Africa

10

10

10

10

3

Japan

6

6

6

6

4

Spain

10

10

10

10

5

United Kingdom

6

6

6

6

6

Chile

10

10

10

10

Total

 

77

95

168

638

Subtotals of individuals from laboratory and field populations are in bold. Australian individuals were from Richmond (New South Wales NSW), Canberra (Australian Capital Territory ACT) and Sunshine Beach (Queensland QLD).

Field (n = 45) and laboratory (n = 32) specimens, including individual and pooled samples of different life stages (Additional file 8: Table S8), were also screened for Cardinium 16S rDNA; all 77 H. haemorrhoidalis extracts were negative (Table 1) while all E. perniciosi controls were positive. In order to characterise bacteria present in H. haemorrhoidalis, we applied the universal eubacterial primer pairs 61F-1227R and 10F-1507R [41] for PCR and isolated sequences through cloning experiments. BLAST analysis revealed that 4 out of 19 cloned sequences from 8 individuals (including larval and adult stages) had a 99% match with Citrus sinensis chloroplast (Genbank accession number DQ864733). Other sequences indicated the presence of bacteria closely related to Enterobacteriaceae previously described as gut symbionts from thrips and other insects (Additional file 6: Table S6). The analysis of eubacteria 16S rDNA did not reveal the presence of Wolbachia, Cardinium or any other known intracellular bacteria.

Antibiotic treatment

Neither antibiotic treatment experiments resulted in the production of male offspring (Table 2 and Additional file 9: Figure S1). Tetracycline treatment of adults appeared to result in higher mortality and lower fecundity than treatment with rifampicin. Rifampicin was subsequently used to treat second instars and adult stages; this also significantly reduced lifetime fecundity of treated thrips. Within the first week of oviposition after treatment, thrips produced significantly fewer eggs than control thrips (t = 2.76, df = 48, p = 0.008) (Table 2). This negative impact of rifampicin was still detected in the second week (t = 2.42, df = 48, p = 0.02), but was not significant in the third week of egg-laying (t = 1.93, df = 48, p = 0.06). Overall, antibiotic treated females produced significantly fewer offspring in the three weeks following treatment than untreated females (t = 4.26, df = 48, p < 0.0001).
Table 2

Sex ratio and mean offspring number of Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis

Treatment

1st week

2nd week

3rd week

Total progeny in 3 weeks

 

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Rifampicin (5%)

2.08 ± 0.23

0

8.56 ± 0.45

0

11.52 ± 0.46

0

22.16 ± 0.52

0

Control

3.04 ± 0.26

0

10.04 ± 0.41

0

12.84 ± 0.50

0

25.92 ± 0.70

0

t-test (df 48)

2.76

 

2.42

 

1.93

 

4.26

 

p

0.008

 

0.02

 

0.06

 

<0.0001

 

This was tested on 25 females during the first, second and third week after rifampicin treatment (both larval and adult stages; second experiment). Differences between treatment and control were tested with an Independent-Samples T test.

Genetic characterisation of H. haemorrhoidalis

Sequencing of COI of 27 individuals collected from different continents resulted in 680 bp fragments without any polymorphic sites. This sequence was identical to the H. haemorrhoidalis COI (GenBank accession number KC513162) collected from ACT, Australia [54]. The sequences contained no stop codon or indel. Phylogenetic analysis together with other thrips sequences from GenBank based on Bayesian Inference, model GTR + G + I showed that H. haemorrhoidalis sits within the subfamily Panchaetothripinae (Additional file 10: Figure S2).

PCR amplifications of H3 gene fragments of H. haemorrhoidalis samples collected from different regions resulted in a strong amplicon of approximately 450 bp. Direct sequencing of these fragments produced ambiguous sequences with mixed peaks. Therefore, PCR products from eight individuals, one each from eight populations, were cloned. This resulted in 33 sequenced clones with a length of 439 bp, including a 109 bp intron (Additional file 11: Figure S3). In addition to this, a single clone of the Queensland individual had a 14 bp insertion within this intron region. There were no indels or stop codons within the 330 bp exon sequence of any individual.

Across the 33 cloned fragments with a 109 bp intron, three polymorphic sites were identified within the 330 bp exon sequence and no variation in the 109 bp intron (Additional file 11: Figure S3), while the single clone of Queensland had 20 polymorphic sites, mainly in the 123 bp intron region. Based on these polymorphic sites across these 34 cloned sequences, five H3 alleles (A1-A5) were defined. All individuals had intra-individual diversity within this locus. Individuals from Australia (Canberra, ACT), New Zealand, Japan and United Kingdom contained two allelic variants, while individuals from Australia (Queensland), South Africa, Spain and Chile presented three H3 alleles, suggesting that these individuals may be polyploid (Table 3, Additional file 11: Figure S3). Bearing in mind the small sample number, there was no unique difference between the individuals that could be indicative of geographic differentiation. Bayesian Inference analyses of H3 sequences (without intron) confirmed the monophyletic position of the five H3 alleles of H. haemorrhoidalis with the sequences of other thrips species within Panchaetothripinae subfamily, although, overall, the H3 phylogeny is not well resolved (Figure 1).
Table 3

Distribution of alleles across Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis individuals

a)

#

Location

H3

EF1a

Alleles

Total

Alleles

Total

1

Australia, ACT

A1, A2

2

A1, A2

2

2

Australia, Queensland

A1, A3, A5

3

A2, A3, A4

3

3

New Zealand

A1, A2

2

A2, A5

2

4

South Africa

A1, A3, A4

3

A2, A6, A7

3

5

Japan

A1, A4

2

A2, A5, A8

3

6

United Kingdom

A1, A4

2

A2, A5, A9

3

7

Spain

A1, A2, A4

3

A2

1

8

Chile 1

A1, A3, A4

3

A2, A6, A10

3

9

Chile 2

n.d.

n.d.

A2, A11, A12

3

b)

 

Number of alleles

Number of individuals ( H3 )

 

Number of individuals ( EF1a)

 
 

1 allele

0

 

1

 
 

2 alleles

4

 

2

 
 

3 alleles

4

 

6

 

a) Number of H3 and EF1a alleles (sequences included both introns and exons) detected in individuals of H. haemorrhoidalis; one individual per population was analysed (two Chilean individuals were analysed for EF1a); b) number of individuals for which one, two or three alleles of H3 and EF1a were detected

ACT: Australian Capital Territory; n.d.: not determined.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree based on H3 exon sequences . This tree was constructed with five alleles of partial H3 exons of Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (318 bp) using Bayesian Inference (model T92 + G + I). The tree also includes other thrips species within the subfamilies Panchaetothripinae and Thripinae (both in the family Thripidae of the suborder Terebrantia). Haplothrips victoriensis (family Phlaeothripidae, suborder Tubulifera) was used as outgroup. Numbers at nodes represent posterior probabilities >50%. Scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Similarly to H3, direct sequencing of the EF1a gene resulted in ambiguous sequences with multiple peaks. Thus, we sequenced 42 clones from eight populations (one or two individuals each), and obtained 861 bp EF1a fragments containing two intron regions (Additional file 12: Figure S4). The exon region was 681 bp and did not reveal any stop codons or indels across individuals. The first intron was the same length (73 bp) for all individuals while the second intron of 41 cloned sequences included indels and ranged from 83 to 85 bp. We also found an additional cloned sequence (sequence Chile 8–1 in Additional file 12: Figure S4) in one individual from Chile that had a divergent nucleotide composition and insertion in the second intron (101 bp).

Across the 42 EF1a sequences, including introns, we identified 12 alleles (Table 3 and Additional file 12: Figure S4). Two to three alleles were found in all individuals, except for the individual from Spain, for which we sequenced nine clones; all nine were identical alleles, suggesting that this individual was homozygous in this locus (Additional file 12: Figure S4). Individuals from Canberra and New Zealand showed two allelic variants while others exhibited three allelic variants, suggesting that these individuals may be polyploid (Table 3 and Additional file 12: Figure S4). The distinct allele (Allele A10) that was detected in one Chilean individual was basal to the other alleles (Figure 2 and Additional file 13: Figure S5).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree based on EF1a exon sequences. The tree was constructed with 12 alleles of Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (681 bp each) and other thrips species within the family of Thripidae using Bayesian Inference (model T92 + I). Numbers at nodes represent posterior probabilities >50%. Scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

When looking at both nuclear loci, we found seven individuals that had three alleles in at least one of two loci, while two individuals (Australia ACT and New Zealand) had two alleles (Table 3).

Notwithstanding the limited number of individuals that were analysed for the two nuclear genes, the overall diversity of three genes COI, H3 and EF1a in H. haemorrhoidalis collected from different countries was found to be low. The mean distance of 27 COI sequences across continents was nil and <1% for H3 intron, H3 exon and EF1a exon sequences, while it was 2.75% for the EF1a intron (Table 4).
Table 4

Nucleotide distances

Locus

Overall mean distance (%)

Sequence length (bp)

COI

0.0

680

H3 exon

0.48

330

H3 intron

0.70

123

EF1a exon

0.95

681

EF1a intron

2.75

180

Overall mean nucleotide distance across COI, H3 and EF1a sequences of Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis.

Discussion

In our study, all H. haemorrhoidalis population samples were all-female, and none were infected with Wolbachia, Cardinium or any other bacterial reproductive manipulators. Antibiotic treatment of a thelytokous laboratory population from Australia did not result in the production of males, indicating that thelytoky in H. haemorrhoidalis is not induced by symbiotic bacteria. Genetic characterisation of the two nuclear genes H3 and EF1a revealed allelic diversity within individuals; unexpectedly most individuals had three allelic variants which could be indicative of polyploidy. No genetic diversity in mitochondrial COI, and low diversity in both nuclear genes H3 and EF1a, suggest that this species may have experienced significant genetic bottlenecks possibly due to its invasion history, or due to an evolutionary switch from arrhenotokous to thelytokous reproduction.

Thelytoky not caused by bacterial symbionts

All 638 tested field and laboratory individuals of H. haemorrhoidalis collected from seven countries of five different continents were negative for Wolbachia when tested with a large set of Wolbachia specific PCR primers. Highly sensitive PCR methods and testing of DNA samples extracted from single and pooled individuals of different developmental stages did also not provide any evidence for low-titre infections.

In contrast, an earlier study by Pintureau et al. [31] reported Wolbachia infection in H. haemorrhoidalis collected from southern France and southern Portugal based on PCR results from two DNA extracts of two to three pooled adults each, using the primers ftsZ102 FOR - ftsZ969 REV designed by Holden et al. [43]. It is possible that this was due to unspecific primer binding, artefact formation, contamination or thrips misidentification. We also obtained amplicons from one DNA extract when using the same ftsZ primers. However, after cloning and sequencing we confirmed that they were not Wolbachia sequences. Highly sensitive PCR assays can detect contaminations deriving from other species that interact with the target species [63]. Nault et al. [64] reported such an issue when testing T. tabaci for Wolbachia; however, negative results in repeated PCR assays using the same template DNA confirmed that the infection was the result of contamination. Pintureau et al. [31] also detected Wolbachia in Megaphragma amalphitanum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid of H. haemorrhoidalis and this parasitoid could have been the source of Wolbachia detection in H. haemorrhoidalis. Moreover, a confirmed Wolbachia-infected thrips species, the banded greenhouse thrips, H. femoralis [12], was involved in the same study and could have been another source of contamination or accidental misidentification. Unfortunately, no DNA sequence of this earlier ftsZ amplicon from H. haemorrhoidalis was reported to confirm and further characterise the Wolbachia strain. Despite this all, it is still possible that H. haemorrhoidalis tested by Pintureau et al. [31] was infected by Wolbachia as we did not assess populations from France and Portugal. However, in our study, all populations (including from Europe) tested negative.

Beyond this, all 77 samples tested for Cardinium were negative. Sequencing of the eubacterial 16S rDNA in H. haemorrhoidalis resulted in the detection of a number of insect gut symbionts previously described from thrips [65,66] but also of chloroplast DNA from the host plant, in both larval and adult stages. This may be indicative that thrips do not only ingest plant sap but cells containing chloroplasts, and chloroplast DNA specific assays of field specimens could be applied in order to characterise host plant associations of thrips species.

As we did not detect any known bacterial reproductive manipulators of insects in H. haemorrhoidalis, we concluded that its thelytoky is not induced by bacteria. This was subsequently confirmed by antibiotic treatment of a thelytokous laboratory population that did not result in arrhenotokous reproduction. Similarly, Nault et al. [64] and Kumm and Moritz [12] found that neither Wolbachia nor any other bacterial symbiont played a role in thelytokous T. tabaci, as antibiotic and heat treatments did not alter the sex ratio of this species. A recent study found Wolbachia at varying prevalence in the three thelytokous grass thrips species. However, Wolbachia appeared to not play a role in the thelytokous reproduction of Aptinothrips karnyi and Aptinothrips stylifer as antibiotic treatment did not remove thelytoky; removal of Wolbachia from thelytokous Aptinothrips rufus, however, resulted in production of some males [67].

Heterozygosity or polyploidy in H. haemorrhoidalis?

In order to further investigate thelytoky in H. haemorrhoidalis we looked at intra-individual allelic diversity of H3 and EF1a in eight and nine individuals, respectively, collected from eight different populations. Although, this is a low sample number for addressing more specific questions about population diversity, it is a large enough sample to investigate mechanisms of thelytoky in this species. Similar approaches have previously been used to clarify the type of diploidy restoration in thelytokous insects belonging to the orders Hymenoptera and Odonata [5,68,69].

Sequence analysis of H3 revealed the unexpected presence of an intron in this gene while previous extensive analysis of H3 of Thysanoptera using the same primers did not report any introns [54]. Based on its highly conserved amino acid sequence across all eukaryotes, H3 can be separated into replication-coupled (RC, also known as H3.1 and H3.2) and replication-independent (RI or H3.3) variants [70]. All 33 cloned H3 exons of H. haemorrhoidalis matched with the RC variant that is expected to not have introns [70]; all exon fragments appeared functional and were monophyletic, and the intron displayed common intron splice recognition sites. The nature of this unexpected H3 intron may require further investigation.

The 843 bp EF1a sequence of H. haemorrhoidalis corresponded to position 598–1280 in the EF1a copy F1 of D. melanogaster [71,72], and contained two introns. The first intron was at the position 753/754, as seen in copy 1 of EF1a in Coleoptera, Dictyoptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, Neuropterida and Odonata [71,72]. The second intron was in position 1150/1151, which had previously been found in three orders: Thysanoptera [73], Psocoptera and Hemiptera [71].

Within each individual we detected two to three allelic variants in both H3 and EF1a, except for the Spanish individual which only had one allele of EF1a, while it had three allelic variants of H3. Two individuals had two alleles in both loci, suggesting heterozygosity, while seven individuals had three alleles in at least one of both nuclear loci. While it is possible that we isolated paralogous gene copies, it is less likely that this happened for both nuclear loci that have previously also been used for phylogenetic analyses [54]. Beyond this, we found the maximum number of alleles identified from any individual was three, which could indicate triploidy. Triploidy has previously been suggested for H. haemorrhoidalis by Bournier [29], so far the most authoritative text about chromosome numbers of this species; this would also fit its relatively higher chromosome number in comparison with other thrips species [74].

However, some of our findings are in conflict with assumptions about the detection of terminal fusion in this species [4,29,30], unless this was previously erroneously reported. Terminal fusion is expected to rapidly erode heterozygosity in individuals [1]. Furthermore, triploidy conflicts with automixis and meiotic division in general [75]. By analysing gametogenesis, Bournier [29] counted n = 21 chromosomes after reductional division, and 2n = 42 chromosomes after fusion. Earlier studies by Pomeyrol [28] and Pussard-Radulesco [76] suggested n = 16 and n = 26/28, respectively, however these studies were commented by Bournier [29] to be less accurate due to inadequate techniques used. A total chromosome number of 42 would allow either diploidy, triploidy or hexaploidy, although higher ploidy levels are very rare for insects except for some weevils [3]. In the instance of terminal fusion in H. haemorrhoidalis, hexaploidy may be the more likely ploidy level than triploidy, with different expectations for allelic diversity within individuals (i.e. three pairs of ‘diploid loci’ which have become ‘homozygous’ through terminal fusion). Recently, Jacobson et al. [75] have detected variation in ploidy between arrhenotokous and thelytokous lineages of T. tabaci by using flow cytometry combined with the microsatellite analyses. Among five thelytokous isofemale lines of T. tabaci, one line was considered diploid while four lines were polyploid, also with a maximum of three alleles per locus observed in seven microsatellite loci. Given that all analysed H. haemorrhoidalis populations were thelytokous we would not expect variation in ploidy levels of this species. Combined, our study and Jacobson et al. [75] provide exciting new insights and warrant future research into the mechanism and evolution of thelytoky in Thysanoptera and its potential link to polyploidy [3].

Low genetic diversity and the origin of thelytoky in H. haemorrhoidalis

We did not find any variation in COI of 27 thrips individuals and only low diversity in H3 and EF1a of nine individuals collected from five continents. It is possible that the species experienced genetic bottlenecks prior to (e.g. through a switch to thelytokous reproduction) or early in the invasion process. Unfortunately, the overall low genetic diversity and our small sample number does not allow us to test the hypothesis of a South American origin of this species, also as we were not able to obtain samples from its potential region of origin in the Amazon region [53]. Future studies should look more intensively into this region, also as the thrips diversity of some South American regions remain poorly explored [22].

It has previously been suggested that parthenogenetic species normally originate from their sexual ancestors [77]. Male H. haemorrhoidalis recorded from South America may indicate that sexual reproduction of H. haemorrhoidalis perhaps still occurs in its native range, together with thelytokous populations [26]. Thelytokous populations may have experienced a reproductive advantage over sexual populations and then spread throughout the world. Alternatively, this species may have lost its capacity to reproduce sexually and only exists in its parthenogenetic form with occasional production of males in some regions [78]. Previous analyses that revealed absence of spermatheca in females of H. haemorrhoidalis would support such a loss of sexual functionality in this species [79], and rare males observed in thelytokous populations may result from a failure in diploidy restoration [80]. The elucidation of H. haemorrhoidalis’s origin and its thelytokous evolution will require further studies of genetic diversity, particularly in the likely region of origin of this species, as well as cytological studies.

Conclusions

In our study we were unable to confirm earlier reports of Wolbachia infections in H. haemorrhoidalis, yet this previous report was perhaps prematurely discussed as mechanism of thelytoky in this species [11,12,32-34]. We have confirmed that thelytoky in this species is due to genetic factors in the host genome, and in the absence of endosymbiotic bacteria, as antibiotic treatment did not result in the reproduction of males. The analysis of genetic diversity at two nuclear loci has indicated that H. haemorrhoidalis may be polyploid (and potentially hexaploid) which does warrant future cytogenetic investigation, in particular as this species is known to reproduce by automixis through terminal fusion. This species may be an important model for unravelling the cytological mechanisms behind thelytokous parthenogenesis in Thysanoptera, and in insects in general.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files. All DNA sequences were deposited and GenBank accession numbers were listed in Additional file 6: Table S6 and Additional file 7: Table S7.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank thrips experts and entomologists in Australia and worldwide for supplying thrips specimens (Additional file 1: Table S1). We also thank Jennifer Morrow, Lluvia Flores-Renteria and three anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. DTN was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (International) and MR by research funds from UWS and HIE.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney
(2)
School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney

References

  1. Rabeling C, Kronauer DJ. Thelytokous parthenogenesis in eusocial hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:273–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stenberg P, Saura A. Cytology of asexual animals. In: Schön I, Martens K, Van Dijk P, editors. Lost sex. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 63–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregory TR, Mable BK. Polyploidy in animals. In: Gregory TR, editor. The evolution of the genome. San Diego: Elsevier; 2005. p. 427–517.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Suomalainen E, Saura A, Lokki J. Cytology and evolution in parthenogenesis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  5. Pearcy M, Hardy O, Aron S. Thelytokous parthenogenesis and its consequences on inbreeding in an ant. Heredity. 2006;96:377–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Heimpel GE, de Boer JG. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:209–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Adachi-Hagimori T, Miura K, Stouthamer R. A new cytogenetic mechanism for bacterial endosymbiont-induced parthenogenesis in Hymenoptera. Proc R Soc B. 2008;275:2667–73.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Weeks AR, Breeuwer JAJ. Wolbachia-induced parthenogenesis in a genus of phytophagous mites. Proc R Soc B. 2001;268:2245–51.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schneider D, Miller WJ, Riegler M. Arthropods shopping for Wolbachia: in manipulative tenants: bacteria associated with arthropods. In: Zchori-Fein E, Bourtzis K, editors. Manipulative tenants: bacteria associated with arthropods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. p. 149–74.Google Scholar
  10. Stouthamer R, Luck RF, Hamilton W. Antibiotics cause parthenogenetic Trichogramma (Hymenoptera/Trichogrammatidae) to revert to sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:2424–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Koivisto RKK, Braig HR. Microorganisms and parthenogenesis. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2003;79:43–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumm S, Moritz G. First detection of Wolbachia in arrhenotokous populations of thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae and Phlaeothripidae) and its role in reproduction. Environ Entomol. 2008;37:1422–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Arakaki N, Miyoshi T, Noda H. Wolbachia-mediated parthenogenesis in the predatory thrips Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Insecta). Proc R Soc B. 2001;268:1011–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zchori-Fein E, Gottlieb Y, Kelly S, Brown J, Wilson J, Karr T, et al. A newly discovered bacterium associated with parthenogenesis and a change in host selection behavior in parasitoid wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:12555–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zchori-Fein E, Perlman SJ, Kelly SE, Katzir N, Hunter MS. Characterization of a ‘Bacteroidetes’ symbiont in Encarsia wasps (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): proposal of ‘Candidatus Cardinium hertigii’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:961–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Weeks AR, Velten R, Stouthamer R. Incidence of a new sex–ratio–distorting endosymbiotic bacterium among arthropods. Proc R Soc B. 2003;270:1857–65.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zchori-Fein E, Perlman SJ. Distribution of the bacterial symbiont Cardinium in arthropods. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:2009–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Provencher LM, Morse GE, Weeks AR, Normark BB. Parthenogenesis in the Aspidiotus nerii complex (Hemiptera: Diaspididae): a single origin of a worldwide, polyphagous lineage associated with Cardinium bacteria. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005;98:629–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagimori T, Abe Y, Date S, Miura K. The first finding of a Rickettsia bacterium associated with parthenogenesis induction among insects. Curr Microbiol. 2006;52:97–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Giorgini M, Bernardo U, Monti M, Nappo A, Gebiola M. Rickettsia symbionts cause parthenogenetic reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Pnigalio soemius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2589–99.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Perlman SJ, Hunter MS, Zchori-Fein E. The emerging diversity of Rickettsia. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273:2097–106.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mound LA. Austral Thysanoptera: 100 years of progress. Austral Entomol. 2014;53:18–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans JD, Shearman DC, Oldroyd BP. Molecular basis of sex determination in haplodiploids. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:1–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis T. Thrips: their biology, ecology and economic importance. London: Academic; 1973.Google Scholar
  25. Mound LA. The identity of the greenhouse thrips Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) (Thysanoptera) and the taxonomic significance of spanandric males. Bull Entomol Res. 1976;66:179–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mound LA, Monteiro R. A review of the genus Heliothrips (Thysanoptera; Thripidae), with a new sister-species of the greenhouse thrips from South Eastern Brazil. J New York Entomol Soc. 1997;105:154–60.Google Scholar
  27. Mound LA, Marullo R. The thrips of central and South America, an introduction (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Memoires Entomol Int. 1996;6:1–488.Google Scholar
  28. Pomeyrol R. La parthenogenesis dês thysanoptères. La maturation des oeufs parthenogenetiques chez l’ Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique. 1928;62:1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Bournier A. Contribution a l’étude de la parthénogenèse des thysanopteres et de sa cytologie. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale. 1956;93:219–318.Google Scholar
  30. Bell G. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  31. Pintureau B, Lassabliere F, Khatchadourian C, Daumal J. Parasitoides oophages et symbiotes de deux thrips Europeens. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France. 1999;35:416–20.Google Scholar
  32. Varikou K, Birouraki A, Tsitsipis I, Sergentani C. Effect of temperature on the fecundity of Pezothrips kellyanus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2012;105:60–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rugman-Jones P, Hoddle M, Amrich R, Heraty J, Stouthamer-Ingel C, Stouthamer R. Phylogeographic structure, outbreeding depression, and reluctant virgin oviposition in the bean thrips, Caliothrips fasciatus (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in California. Bull Entomol Res. 2012;102:698–709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moritz G. The biology of thrips is not the biology of their adults: a developmental view. In: Marullo R, Mound L, editors. Thrips and Tospoviruses: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Thysanoptera. Canberra: CSIRO; 2002. p. 259–67.Google Scholar
  35. Zabaras D, Wyllie S, Spooner-Hart R, Tronson D. Semiochemicals of rose aphid, black citrus aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and greenhouse thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Australian Zoologist. 1999;31:403–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Beattie G, Jiang L. Greenhouse thrips and its parasitoids in coastal New South Wales. Gen Appl Entomol. 1990;22:21–4.Google Scholar
  37. OZ Thrips - Thysanoptera in Australia [http://www.ozthrips.org/].
  38. Hail D, Lauzìere I, Dowd SE, Bextine B. Culture independent survey of the microbiota of the glassy-winged sharpshooter (Homalodisca vitripennis) using 454 pyrosequencing. Environ Entomol. 2011;40:23–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou W, Rousset F, O’Neill S. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc R Soc B. 1998;265:509–15.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Werren JH, Windsor DM. Wolbachia infection frequencies in insects: evidence of a global equilibrium? Proc R Soc B. 2000;267:1277–85.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Neill SL, Giordano R, Colbert A, Karrg T, Robertson H. 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:2699–702.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Baldo L, Hotopp JCD, Jolley KA, Bordenstein SR, Biber SA, Choudhury RR, et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:7098–110.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Holden PR, Brookfield JFY, Jones P. Cloning and characterization of an ftsZ homologue from a bacterial symbiont of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Genet Genomics. 1993;240:213–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Werren JH, Zhang W, Guo LR. Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia: reproductive parasites of arthropods. Proc R Soc B. 1995;261:55–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Simões PM, Mialdea G, Reiss D, Sagot MF, Charlat S. Wolbachia detection: an assessment of standard PCR protocols. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:567–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Arthofer W, Riegler M, Dimitrios N, Stauffer C. Evidence for low‐titre infections in insect symbiosis: Wolbachia in the bark beetle Pityogenes chalcographus (Coleoptera, Scolytinae). Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:1923–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Jeyaprakash A, Hoy M. Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty three arthropod species. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:393–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Duron O, Bouchon D, Boutin S, Bellamy L, Zhou L, Engelstädter J, et al. The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone. BMC Biol. 2008;6:27.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Dao TH. Ecology of red scale (Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) [Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae]) in citrus orchards on the Central Coast of New South Wales, PhD Thesis. School of Science and Health. Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond: University of Western Sydney; 2012.Google Scholar
  50. Morrow J, Frommer M, Shearman D, Riegler M. Tropical tephritid fruit fly community with high incidence of shared Wolbachia strains as platform for horizontal transmission of endosymbionts. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:3622–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rivnay E. Ecological studies of the greenhouse thrips, Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis, in Palestine. Bull Entomol Res. 1935;26:267–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rugman-Jones PF, Hoddle MS, Stouthamer R. Population genetics of Scirtothrips perseae: tracing the origin of a recently introduced exotic pest of Californian avocado orchards, using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA markers. Entomol Exp Appl. 2007;124:101–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Buckman RS, Mound LA, Whiting MF. Phylogeny of thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) based on five molecular loci. Syst Entomol. 2012;38:123–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Lo N, Tokuda G, Watanabe H, Rose H, Slaytor M, Maekawa K, et al. Evidence from multiple gene sequences indicates that termites evolved from wood-feeding cockroaches. Curr Biol. 2000;10:801–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Monteiro A, Pierce NE. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF-1α gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001;18:264–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF, Crandall KA. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13486–91.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hall BG. Phylogenetic trees made easy: a how-to manual. Sunderland: Sinauer; 2011.Google Scholar
  60. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–42.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Villablance FX, Roderick GK, Palumbi SR. Invasion genetics of the Mediteranean fruit fly: variation in multiple nuclear introns. Mol Ecol. 1998;7:547–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Schneider DI, Riegler M, Arthofer W, Merçot H, Stauffer C, Miller WJ. Uncovering Wolbachia diversity upon artificial host transfer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82402.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hilgenboecker K, Hammerstein P, Schlattmann P, Telschow A, Werren JH. How many species are infected with Wolbachia?– a statistical analysis of current data. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;281:215–20.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nault BA, Shelton AM, Gangloff-Kaufmann JL, Clark ME, Werren JL, Cabrera-la Rosa JC, et al. Reproductive modes in onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) populations from New York onion fields. Environ Entomol. 2006;35:1264–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Chanbusarakum LJ, Ullman DE. Characterization of bacterial symbionts in Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), Western flower thrips. J Invertebr Pathol. 2008;99:318–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. de Vries EJ, Breeuwer JAJ, Jacobs G, Mollema C. The association of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, with a near Erwinia species gut bacteria: transient or permanent? J Invertebr Pathol. 2001;77:120–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. van der Kooi CJ, Schwander T. Evolution of asexuality via different mechanisms in grass thrips (Thysanoptera: Aptinothrips). Evolution. 2014;68:1883–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Lorenzo-Carballa MO, Cordero-Rivera A. Thelytokous parthenogenesis in the damselfly Ischnura hastata (Odonata, Coenagrionidae): genetic mechanisms and lack of bacterial infection. Heredity. 2009;103:377–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rey O, Loiseau A, Facon B, Foucaud J, Orivel J, Cornuet J-M, et al. Meiotic recombination dramatically decreased in thelytokous queens of the little fire ant and their sexually produced workers. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2591–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Waterborg JH. Evolution of histone H3: emergence of variants and conservation of post-translational modification sites. Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;90:79–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Djernæs M, Damgaard J. Exon-intron structure, paralogy and sequenced regions of elongation factor-1 alpha in Hexapoda. Arthropod Syst Phylogeny. 2006;64:45–52.Google Scholar
  72. Danforth BN, Ji S. Elongation factor-1 alpha occurs as two copies in bees: implications for phylogenetic analysis of EF-1 alpha sequences in insects. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15:225–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Morris DC, Schwarz MP, Cooper SJ, Mound LA. Phylogenetics of Australian Acacia thrips: the evolution of behaviour and ecology. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002;25:278–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Brito R, Affonso P, Silva Jr J. Chromosomal diversity and phylogenetic inferences concerning thrips (Insecta, Thysanoptera) in a semi-arid region of Brazil. Genet Mol Res. 2010;9:2230–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Jacobson AL, Johnston JS, Rotenberg D, Whitfield AE, Booth W, Vargo EL, et al. Genome size and ploidy of Thysanoptera. Insect Mol Biol. 2013;22:12–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Pussard-Radulesco E. Recherches biologiques et cytologiques sur quelques Thysanoptères. Annual Epiphyties. 1930;16:103–88.Google Scholar
  77. Simon J, Delmotte F, Rispe C, Crease T. Phylogenetic relationships between parthenogens and their sexual relatives: the possible routes to parthenogenesis in animals. J Linn Soc. 2003;79:151–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. van der Kooi CJ, Schwander T. On the fate of sexual traits under asexuality. Biol Rev. 2014;89:805–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Del Bene G, Cavallo V, Lupetti P, Dallai R. Ultrastructure of the accessory gland in the parthenogenetic thrips Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 1998;27:255–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Leach IM, Pannebakker BA, Schneider MV, Driessen G, Zande L, Beukeboom LW. Thelytoky in Hymenoptera with Venturia canescens and Leptopilina clavipes as case studies. In: Schön I, Martens K, van Dijk P, editors. Lost Sex. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 347–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nguyen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.