Open Access

Reevaluating Emx gene phylogeny: homopolymeric amino acid tracts as a potential factor obscuring orthology signals in cyclostome genes

BMC Evolutionary Biology201515:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0351-z

Received: 3 November 2014

Accepted: 15 April 2015

Published: 4 May 2015

Abstract

Background

Vertebrate Emx genes, retained as multiple copies, are expressed in a nested pattern in the early embryonic forebrain and required for its regionalization. This pattern seems to have originated in a vertebrate common ancestor; however, a previous analysis, reporting two lamprey Emx genes, claimed independent Emx gene duplications in both cyclostome (extant jawless fish) and gnathostome (jawed vertebrate) lineages after their divergence. This scenario is neither parsimonious nor consistent with the hypothesis that genome expansion occurred before the cyclostome-gnathostome split, which is supported by recent genome-wide analyses.

Results

We isolated and sequenced cDNA of two hagfish Emx genes and performed intensive molecular phylogenetic analyses, including the hagfish and/or lamprey Emx genes. The lamprey genes tended to attract each other in inferred phylogenetic trees, an effect that tended to be relaxed on inclusion of the hagfish genes. The results of these analyses suggest that cyclostome EmxB is orthologous to gnathostome Emx2, which was also supported by conserved synteny. Homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts represent a remarkable feature of the lamprey Emx sequences, and a comparative genome-wide scan revealed that lamprey proteins exhibit a unique pattern of HPAA tract accumulation.

Conclusions

Our analysis, including hagfish Emx genes, suggests that gene duplications gave rise to Emx1, -2 and -3 before the cyclostome-gnathostome split. We propose that independent HPAA tract accumulations in multiple ancient duplicates, as identified in lamprey Emx gene products, may have led to erroneous identification of gene duplication in the lamprey lineage. Overall, our reanalysis favors the scenario that the nested Emx expression pattern in mouse and lamprey shares a common origin.

Keywords

Emx Gene duplication Cyclostome Lamprey Hagfish Conserved synteny Homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts

Background

Homeobox-containing Emx genes of vertebrates play pivotal roles in the regionalization of the telencephalon [1-3]. In the early embryonic forebrain, Emx2 is expressed widely in the pallium, which develops into the cerebral cortex, while the expression of Emx1 is observed in the dorsal, medial and lateral pallium, but not the ventral pallium which later differentiates to form a part of the claustroamygdaloid complex in mammals [4]. This nested pattern has been reported commonly in jawed vertebrates, including the mouse [5,6], zebrafish [7,8], and small spotted catshark [9].

Tank et al. reported two Emx genes of sea lamprey, a jawless fish, which are also expressed in a nested pattern, as in gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) [10]. They performed molecular phylogenetic analyses including these two sea lamprey Emx genes, and suggested that they duplicated uniquely in the lineage leading to lampreys, independently from the gene duplication that gave rise to Emx1 and -2 of jawed vertebrates [10] (Figure 1b). This suggests that the nested expression patterns in cyclostome (extant jawless fish) and gnathostome lineages converged from independent origins; however, principle of parsimony suggests that these expression patterns in these diverse vertebrates is more likely to share a common ancestry (Figure 1a).
Figure 1

Alternative scenarios for timing of Emx gene duplication. (a) Scenario supporting the common Emx duplication before the cyclostome-gnathostome split. In this scenario, the establishment of the nested Emx expression could have occurred once before the cyclostome-gnathostome split just after the gene duplication. (b) Scenario supporting independent Emx duplications in both of the lamprey and gnathostome lineages. In this scenario, the nested Emx gene expression (see Background) is assumed to have been established independently in the two lineages, as a result of convergence. (c) Nested expression patterns of Emx genes in the embryonic brains of sea lamprey and mouse. The ranges of the gene expressions including the pallium (pal) in the telencephalon (tel) along the anteroposterior axis are indicated with the lengths of the thickened vertical bars.

A previous study showed that the genome expansion that accompanied massive gene duplications (‘two-round whole genome duplications’ abbreviated in 2R-WGD) occurred before the cyclostome-gnathostome split [11] scenario finding that was also supported by later studies [12,13]. Nonetheless, assigning orthology of jawless fish genes to gnathostome counterparts is often not straightforward [14], possibly due to the high GC content and biased amino acid composition of lamprey genes [12,15,16].

In this study, we reexamined the molecular phylogeny of Emx genes and investigated lamprey-specific sequence characteristics affecting molecular phylogenetic analyses. We sought to address the question of whether the nested Emx gene expressions were established a single time in the vertebrate common ancestor or independently in both gnathostome and cyclostome lineages.

Methods

Isolation and sequencing of cDNA for cyclostome Emx genes

Total RNAs were extracted from the adult liver of the inshore hagfish (Eptatretus burgeri) and embryos of the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum or L. camtschaticum). These were used as templates for cDNA synthesis with the 3ˊRACE System (Invitrogen). For each of these two species, the prepared cDNA was used as templates for PCR with the forward degenerate primer 5ˊ-CGN GCN TTY GAR AAR AAY CAY TAY GT-3ˊ corresponding to the conserved amino acid stretch (H/R)AFEKNHYV and the AUAP primer supplied in the 3ˊRACE System (Life Technologies). The product of this amplification was used in the nested PCR with the forward degenerate primer 5ˊ-C GAR AAR AAY CAY TAY GTN GTN GG-3ˊ corresponding to the conserved amino acid stretch EKNHYVVG and the AUAP primer. cDNA cloning and sequencing were performed as described previously [17], to identify cDNA sequences of the inshore hagfish EmxA and EmxB as well as that of the Japanese lamprey EmxB. The upstream sequences of the cDNAs were amplified and sequenced using the GeneRacer kit (Life Technologies). These sequences were deposited in DDBJ under the accession numbers, AB935430-AB935432, with their deduced amino acid sequences (Figure 2). The experiment was conducted according to the institutional and national guideline for animal ethics.
Figure 2

Deduced amino acid sequences of the cyclostome Emx genes. The putative full-length amino acid sequences deduced from the nucleotide cDNA sequences are shown for EmxA and -B of the sea lamprey (P. marinus), Japanese lamprey (L. camtschaticum) and inshore hagfish (E. burgeri). Homeodomains are indicated with bold letters. HPAA tracts of size 10 or larger are indicated with gray background.

Sequence retrieval

Protein sequences showing significant similarity to the sea lamprey genes [accession IDs: Emx, ACS91460 and ACS91461; Pdzd8 (PDZ domain containing 8); ENSPMAP00000007079; ENSPMAP00000006415] were retrieved from the Ensembl Genome Browser [18] using aLeaves [19] (Additional files 1 and 2). The Emx and Pdzd8 sequences of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), the spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) and the little skate (Leucoraja erinacea), which are not available as full-length sequences in Ensembl, were retrieved manually from their respective genome assemblies (version LepOcu1 available at Ensembl Pre! for spotted gar and version 1 available at SkateBase for little skate; [20]). The curated nucleotide sequences and their deduced amino acid sequences are included in (Additional files 3 and 4).

Phylogenetic analysis

Protein sequences collected as described above were aligned using MAFFT version 7.215 [21] and trimmed manually based on the results of TrimAl v1.2 [22] with no gap allowed and a similarity threshold (st) of 0.0005. For every data set, the optimal model for amino acid substitutions was chosen according to the results of ProtTest 3 [23]. Heuristic maximum-likelihood (ML) tree inference was performed using PhyML v3.0 [24]. Exhaustive ML analysis with constraints of relationships inside particular taxa was performed using TreePuzzle 5.2 [25], by inputting all possible tree topologies in a ‘user defined tree’ mode. Statistical tests of tree topologies and probabilistic counts of gene duplications were performed using CONSEL version 0.20 [26], as previously reported [11]. Preliminary neighbor-joining (NJ) trees were inferred using ClustalW version 2.1 [27] at default settings.

Numbers of synonymous substitutions (K s) per site were computed with the program yn00 at the online tool Phylemon 2 (http://phylemon.bioinfo.cipf.es; [28]) in which PAML version 4.4c [29] is implemented, using nucleotide sequence alignment of the relevant gene pair for protein-coding regions.

Synteny analysis

We compared genomic scaffolds containing gnathostome and cyclostome Emx genes using the Ensembl genome browser (release 74). For sea lamprey and Japanese lamprey, Emx-containing scaffolds were retrieved from Ensembl or from Japanese lamprey Genome Project (genome assembly LetJap1.0) ([30]; http://jlampreygenome.imcb.a-star.edu.sg/), and prediction of protein-coding genes by using Augustus with the species parameter set to ‘Petromyzon marinus’ ([31]; http://augustus.gobics.de/).

Evaluation of multiple sequence alignment methods

The two lamprey Emx genes and 24 other Emx genes used in the ML analysis describe above were employed in this in silico deletion analysis. Their full-length sequences before and after the deletion of the Q-tracts and A-tracts in the two lamprey Emx peptide sequences were aligned using MAFFT version 7.215 [21], T-COFFEE version 9.03 [32], and ClustalW 2.1 [33] with default settings. The resultant multiple alignments were trimmed with TrimAl v1.2 [22] with five different settings: (1) no gap allowed, (2) no gap allowed and the similarity threshold ‘st’ of 0.00005, (3) no gap allowed and st = 0.0001, (4) no gap allowed and st = 0.0005, and (5) no gap allowed and st = 0.001. Using the selected amino acid sites, the datasets were subjected to substitution model selection with ProtTest 3 [23]. As JTT + Γ4 was chosen as the optimal model for most of the datasets, we uniformly applied this model to compare the results between the different datasets. Maximum-likelihood analysis was performed with TreePuzzle 5.2 [25] by inputting all possible tree topologies consisting of six OTUs (gnathostome Emx1-3, lamprey EmxA, lamprey EmxB and outgroup) in ‘user defined tree’ mode. We computed approximate bootstrap probabilities (BP) for individual tree topologies with resampling of estimated log-likelihoods (RELL) [34] with CONSEL [26]. To evaluate variable alignment results, the degrees of support for the exclusive grouping of lamprey EmxA and EmxB were quantified as the sum of RELL BP for the tree topologies supporting this relationship.

Detection of homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts

We analyzed the protein datasets for three representative vertebrates (i.e., human, zebrafish, sea lamprey). In order to ensure the collection of protein-coding sequences with evidence of transcription, NCBI RefSeq Proteins ([35]; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/) were used for the analyses of human and zebrafish datasets (downloaded on July 16, 2013). For the sea lamprey, a sequence dataset without splicing variants (n = 24,271), provided by the Genome Consortium ([12]; http://genome.wustl.edu/genomes/detail/petromyzon-marinus/), was adopted. To validate the results based on this Genome Consortium dataset, for the sea lamprey, we used ‘all and known proteins’ sequences (n = 11,442) available at Ensembl release 72 (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-72/fasta/petromyzon_marinus/pep/Petromyzon_marinus.Pmarinus_7.0.72.pep.all.fa.gz). mRNA-derived protein sequences (n = 1,088) available at NCBI Proteins (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein; downloaded on July 16, 2013), which presumably do not exhibit false-positive identification of HPAA tracts in non-coding sequences (e.g., introns), were also collected and analyzed. For these datasets, we selected one representative peptide sequence with the largest length among multiple alternative splicing variants for each gene.

To exclude species-specific sequences that might represent false-positive gene prediction, for each of the three species above, we prepared a set of sequences for which homologs are present in the other two species. The threshold for this cross-species matching was a bit score of no less than 200 in reciprocal BLASTP searches [36] with the options ‘-seg yes -soft masking true’.

In the datasets for these three species prepared as above, we identified and counted homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts with stretches occupied by identical amino acids for no less than six consecutive residues. To validate the results with this criterion, we performed the same count under other criteria with eight and ten consecutive residues. Chi-square test and two-tailed test of population proportion with R 3.1.2 (http://www.r-project.org) were employed in the statistical evaluation of significance of differences in the proportions of HPAA tract-containing peptides and in the proportions of amino acids contained in HPAA tracts between species. Likewise, the frequencies of HPAA tracts consisting of no less than 12 amino acids among those consisting of no less than six amino acids were compared between species and assessed with two-tailed test of population proportion.

Gene Ontology analysis

Overrepresentation of Gene Ontology (GO) terms was analyzed using FatiGO ([37]; http://babelomics.bioinfo.cipf.es/). After obtaining the set of HPAA tract-containing sequences for each species, we performed BLASTP searches and identified the most similar human Ensembl peptide for each of the sequences. Human Ensembl gene IDs associated with the identified Ensembl peptides were submitted for overrepresentation analysis using the default settings in the FatiGO web server.

Results

Emx gene repertoire in diverse vertebrates including cyclostomes

To make a comprehensive comparison of vertebrate Emx genes, we collected a wide range of vertebrate Emx sequences, including cyclostomes. We newly determined the nucleotide sequences of hagfish EmxA, EmxB, and the Japanese lamprey EmxB (LjEmxB). Previously, two Emx sequences were identified in Petromyzon marinus (PmEmxA and PmEmxB), while only one was reported for Lethenteron japonicum (LjEmx). We computed the number of synonymous substitutions (K s) per site for the two pairs of sequences (LjEmx-PmEmxA and LjEmxB-PmEmxB) between these species. The EmxA pair resulted in the K s of 0.089, and the EmxB pair 0.113. According to the previous report of the standard K s value for this species pair (0.15 ± 0.09; [15]), we confirmed the orthologies of EmxA and EmxB in these two species, and here designate the previously reported LjEmx as LjEmxA.

As reported above, two Emx homologs were identified in all the three cyclostome species analyzed in this study (Figure 2; Additional file 1). Orthology between hagfish and lamprey was assessed with molecular phylogenetic analysis based on exhaustive maximum-likelihood (ML) method (Additional file 5). In particular, the orthology of hagfish EmxB to lamprey EmxB was supported in all tree topologies showing a smaller ΔlogL than its standard error (Additional file 5). The orthology between hagfish EmxA and lamprey EmxA was also supported in most of those tree topologies (Additional file 5).

Intensive analyses show that the Emx3 ortholog has been retained in the genomes of marsupials, amphibians, bony fishes (e.g., coelacanth) and cartilaginous fishes (e.g., little skate), but not in eutherian mammals, birds or reptiles (Additional file 1), consistent with previous reports ([2,7]; reviewed in [38]).

Phylogeny of cyclostome Emx genes

In order to test alternative hypotheses concerning the origin of the nested expression pattern of Emx genes (Figure 1), molecular phylogeny of vertebrate Emx genes was examined with a more operational strategy. We first performed heuristic ML analysis including both hagfish and lamprey without any a priori constraint of phylogenetic relationship. This analysis did not result in exclusive clustering of cyclostome EmxA and -B (Additional file 6). To focus on relationships between cyclostome genes and the three gnathostome Emx genes (Emx1, -2 and -3), we constrained relationships among gnathostome species within the three subtypes. The dataset employed in this analysis corresponded to six operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and all possible tree topologies with six OTUs (105 tree topologies) showed P values of no less than 0.05 in KH and SH tests (Table 1). When hagfish Emx genes were excluded, two lamprey Emx genes clustered together, but with low support values (bootstrap probabilities in the NJ and ML methods, 47 and 51; Figure 3a; see Additional file 7 for the sequence alignment used). Importantly, when lamprey genes were excluded, hagfish EmxB clustered with gnathostome Emx2 (Figure 3b, bootstrap probabilities in the NJ and ML methods, 45 and 30). When only one of the cyclostome genes was included, gnathostome Emx2 clustered with lamprey EmxB, as well as with hagfish EmxB (Additional file 8), although bootstrap probabilities were not high in either case. Our phylogenetic trees supported a proximity of human to actinopterygian fishes in the Emx1 subgroup (Figure 3; Additional files 6 and 8), and indicate its more complicated evolutionary history within this group. However, synteny conservation around Emx1 genes corroborates the orthology between them [2], and the relationship in our trees, which is inconsistent with generally accepted species phylogeny, may be caused by long branch attraction driven by rapid evolution of mammalian Emx1 sequences.
Table 1

ML analysis of vertebrate Emx gene phylogeny

Rank

Tree topology

log L

Δlog L ± SE

P value

1sKH

SH

1

(((((g1,g3),g2),cB),cA),outgroup)

-1909.94

ML

1.00

1.00

2

(((((g1,g3),cB),g2),cA),outgroup)

-1910.93

0.99 ± 1.84

0.27

0.82

3

((((g1,g3),(g2,cB)),cA),outgroup)

-1910.93

0.99 ± 1.84

0.26

0.82

4

(((((g1,g3),g2),cA),cB),outgroup)

-1911.62

1.68 ± 2.27

0.22

0.74

5

((((g1,g3),g2),(cA,cB)),outgroup)

-1911.62

1.68 ± 2.27

0.20

0.74

6

((((g1,g3),(cA,cB)),g2),outgroup)

-1912.39

2.45 ± 2.56

0.17

0.63

7

(((g1,g3),((cA,cB),g2)),outgroup)

-1912.39

2.46 ± 2.55

0.17

0.63

8

((((g1,g3),(g2,cB)),cA),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.17

0.60

9

((((g1,g3),cB),(g2,cA)),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.16

0.60

10

(((((g1,g3),cA),g2),cB),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.17

0.60

11

((((g1,g3),cA),(g2,cB)),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.17

0.60

12

(((((g1,g3),cB),cA),g2),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.19

0.60

13

(((g1,g3),((g2,cB),cA)),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.18

0.60

14

(((g1,g3),((g2,cA),cB)),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.18

0.60

15

(((((g1,g3),cA),cB),g2),outgroup)

-1912.61

2.68 ± 2.91

0.19

0.60

Abbreviation: SE standard error, 1sKH One-sided Kishino-Hasegawa test, SH Shimodaira-Hasegawa test, g1 gnathostome Emx1, g2 gnathostome Emx2, g3 gnathostome Emx3, cA cyclostome EmxA, cB cyclostome EmxB.

Figure 3

Maximum-likelihood tree for vertebrate Emx genes with either cyclostome species. These ML trees were reconstructed using 132 amino acid sites in the multiple alignment in Additional file 7 under the JTT model [49] with among-site rate heterogeneity taken into account by assuming the gamma distribution [50] with four rate categories (JTT + Γ4 model). To evaluate the effect of the choice of cyclostome sequences, we performed the analysis including sea lamprey (a) or hagfish (b), with a shape parameter of the gamma distribution α of 0.37 and 0.38, respectively. The numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap probabilities with 100 replicates for the ML and NJ methods, in order.

Cyclostome-gnathostome orthology assessed with conserved synteny

To confirm the orthology between cyclostome EmxB and gnathostome Emx2 suggested above, we compared the synteny in genomic regions containing these genes. The sea lamprey scaffold containing EmxB (scaffold GL476962 in Ensembl), which is approximately 1.8 Mbp long, contains several genes homologous to those in the Emx2-containing regions in the gnathostome genomes (Figure 4a; Additional file 9). Among the neighboring genes is Pdzd8, identified as a single copy in all species analyzed. Molecular phylogeny of this gene is consistent with generally accepted species phylogeny (Figure 4b; see Additional file 10 for the sequence alignment used), suggesting one-to-one orthology between the lamprey and jawed vertebrate Pdzd8 genes. This probable orthology, as a tier of genomic regions containing those genes, indicates orthology between the EmxB-containing region in the lamprey genome and Emx2-containing region in jawed vertebrates. This one-to-one orthology between the EmxB-containing genomic region in sea lamprey and the Emx2-containing genomic region, supported by the Pdzd8 phylogeny, indicates orthology between the lamprey EmxB and gnathostome Emx2.
Figure 4

Evidence for orthology between cyclostome EmxB and gnathostome Emx2. (a) Synteny conservation between the genomic regions containing Emx2 of gnathostomes and EmxB of sea lamprey. Assignment of gene names in this figure was based on orthology information in Ensembl except the one in a parenthesis (“Slc18a2”) which was assigned by using BLASTP. (b) Molecular phylogeny of vertebrates Pdzd8 genes, included in the Emx-containing genomic regions in (a). This ML tree was inferred using 600 amino acid sites in the multiple alignment in Additional file 10, assuming the JTT model with amino acid frequencies taken into account (JTT + Γ4 + F model) (shape parameter α = 1.17). The numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap probabilities with 100 replicates for the ML and NJ methods, in order.

The sea lamprey genomic scaffold containing EmxA (Ensembl GL481279), which is less than 24 Kbp, does not contain any other genes, providing no clue for its orthology to jawed vertebrate homologs. In the genome of the Japanese lamprey, EmxA is located in a 5.1 Mbp-long scaffold (scaffold00019 in the assembly version LetJap1 available at http://jlampreygenome.imcb.a-star.edu.sg) and is surrounded by potential orthologs of the genes flanking the Emx1 gene (Rab11fip5, Dysferlin, Cyp26b1, and Exoc6b) in gnathostome genomes. Although all of them have paralogs derived from 2R-WGD, this result suggests possible orthology of the cyclostome EmxA-containing genomic region to the gnathostome Emx1-containing genomic region.

Timing of Emx gene duplications

While our synteny analysis supports common origin for multiple Emx genes (Figure 1a), the ML trees in our molecular phylogenetic analysis did not yield unequivocal results (Figure 3), especially because multiple tree topologies were supported with similar log-likelihood values (Table 1). In order to scrutinize overall trend in the result of our ML analysis, we performed probabilistic counts of gene duplication [11]. From an entire ML tree inference, considering all possible tree topologies, this analysis yields the number of gene duplication before the cyclostome-gnathostome split (N bef ) as well as the number of gene duplication after the cyclostome-gnathostome split (N aft ). We employed the data set used in Figure 3 for gnathostomes and outgroups, with variable sets of cyclostome sequences. As a result, N bef was shown to be larger than N aft in all the cases we analyzed (Table 2), suggesting the Emx gene duplication before the cyclostome-gnathostome split (Figure 1a). The number of gene duplications in the cyclostome lineage (N cyc ) was shown to be markedly smaller than N bef and N aft , (< 0.1) when hagfish sequences were included in the data set (Table 2).
Table 2

Probabilistic count of Emx gene duplications based on the ML method

Cyclostome included

ML tree topology

N bef

N aft

N cyc

N unk

Sea lamprey and hagfish

(((((g3,g1),g2),cB),cA),outgroup);

1.36

1.32

0.09

0.18

Sea lamprey

((((g3,g1),g2),(cB,cA)),outgroup);

1.21

0.93

0.63

0.21

Hagfish

((((cB,g2),(g3,g1)),cA),outgroup);

2.02

0.56

0.02

0.34

Abbreviation: g1 gnathostome Emx1, g2 gnathostome Emx2, g3 gnathostome Emx3, cA cyclostome EmxA, cB cyclostome EmxB. See Kuraku et al. [11] for details of N bef, N aft, N cyc, and N unk.

According to the results of ProtTest3, JTT+I+Γ4 model was employed for the analysis with both sea lamprey and hagfish, while JTT+Γ4 model was employed for the analyses with either of sea lamprey and hagfish.

Homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts: effect of lamprey-specific sequence characteristics

Our synteny analysis, based solely on gene locations, suggested one-to-one orthology between cyclostome EmxB and gnathostome Emx2 (Figure 4). However, when hagfish genes were excluded, the molecular phylogenetic tree did not support such one-to-one orthology, and suggested instead a lamprey lineage-specific gene duplication between EmxA and –B, (Figure 3a). To investigate the cause of this inconsistency thoroughly, we analyzed the multiple alignment of amino acid sequences, and identified long tracts of alanine (A) and glutamine (Q) in the N-terminal domain of both sea lamprey EmxA and -B (Figure 2; Additional file 7). Since hagfish Emx genes have neither of the homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts (Additional file 7), the two lamprey Emx sequences are thought to have acquired these tracts independently after the separation of this lineage from the ancestral lineage leading to hagfishes. To examine possible effect of the HPAA tracts on phylogenetic analyses, we artificially deleted them (Figure 5a) and analyzed its impact on multiple sequence alignment with different alignment programs. Remarkably, when intact sequences with HPAA tracts were employed, alignment with ClustalW solely resulted in markedly high support for the exclusive clustering of lamprey EmxA and –B (Figure 5b). This effect was weakened when HPAA tracts were deleted before alignment (Figure 5b). Taken together, our analysis reproduces the result by Tank et al. [10] and indicates that the presence of HPAA tracts may be the source of the erroneous conclusion.
Figure 5

Examination on the effect of HPAA tracts in lamprey Emx sequences. (a) Schematics of lamprey Emx sequences used in this analysis. The A-tract (A) and Q-tract (Q) correspond to those indicated with gray background in Figure 2. The two intact or artificially modified (ΔHPAA) lamprey Emx sequences were aligned with their homologs by using ClustalW, MAFFT, or T-Coffee. The resultant multiple alignments were passed on to selection of amino acid sites using TrimAl with different settings (see Methods). (b) Comparison of degrees of the support for the lamprey EmxA-EmxB grouping. RELL bootstrap probabilities for this relationship were computed in a ML analysis by inputting datasets prepared with the variable stringencies in site trimming with TrimAl (no gap allowed and st of 0.00001 to 0.001), as well as variable choices of alignment programs and the presence or absence of the HPAA tracts (see Methods).

In order to identify any marked pattern of HPAA accumulation unique to lampreys, we compared the frequencies of HPAA tract-containing peptides for each amino acid among human, zebrafish, and sea lamprey. HPAA tracts were observed widely throughout the genomes of these three species (Additional file 11), as reported previously [39]. Between the three species, there were significant differences in the frequency of HPAA tract-containing peptides (Consortium dataset: p < 0.0001; NCBI mRNA dataset: p < 0.01). Moreover, the frequencies of peptides containing HPAA tracts for individual amino acids exhibited marked difference in these species (Figure 6; Additional file 12). In sea lamprey, peptides with tracts of Q and glycine (G) were observed nearly three-fold more frequently than in human and zebrafish (p < 0.0001). This tendency was also observed with the Ensembl peptide dataset (G: lamprey, 2.8%; human, 1.6%; zebrafish, 0.9%; p < 0.0001; Q: lamprey, 1.9%; human, 1.0%; zebrafish, 0.8%; p < 0.0001 for lamprey-zebrafish and lamprey-human differences) and mRNA-derived peptide sequences in NCBI Protein (G: lamprey, 8.2%; human, 2.9%; zebrafish, 1.4%; p < 0.05; Q: lamprey, 7.0%; human, 1.5%; zebrafish, 0.4%; p < 0.05).
Figure 6

Genome-wide frequencies of homopolymeric amino acid tracts in the sea lamprey, human, and zebrafish. Peptide sequences with homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts (those with a stretch of no less than six consecutive residues) were extracted from public database and compared among the three vertebrates (see Methods for details). This figure shows the frequencies of HPAA tract-containing peptides. The results with the different criteria (stretches of no less than eight and ten consecutive residues) are shown in Additional file 12.

We also compared the composition of HPAA tracts between the three species, taking the number of HPAAs in the tracts into consideration. The proportion of amino acids contained in HPAA tracts was significantly higher in sea lamprey (0.36%; p < 2.2e-16) than in human (0.18%) and zebrafish (0.13%) (Additional file 11). The proportion of A (alanine), as well as G and Q, contained in HPAA tracts were significantly higher in sea lamprey than in human and zebrafish (p < 0.00005). Also, we analyzed the frequency of the HPAA tracts consisting of no less than twelve amino acids in HPAA tracts consisting of no less than six amino acids. Overall, it was slightly higher in human (8.6%) than in sea lamprey (7.0%) and zebrafish (5.1%) but, the difference was not significant. Only the frequency of poly-Q tracts consisting of no less than twelve amino acids was significantly higher in human (23.1%; p < 0.05) than in sea lamprey (9.6%) and zebrafish (10.6%).

We analyzed functional properties of HPAA tract-containing peptides using Gene Ontology (GO) terms for molecular function. Additional file 13 shows GO terms overrepresented commonly in Genome Consortium dataset and Ensembl dataset (see Methods for the detail of these datasets). GO terms commonly overrepresented in both datasets were identified for peptides containing homopolymeric tracts of proline (P), Q, and G, but no GO term for molecular function was overrepresented for alanine (A) tract-containing peptides of the sea lamprey. Among the overrepresented terms, those associated with transcriptional regulation were dominant, regardless of species (Additional file 13). Lamprey-specific overrepresentations were detected for terms “amine binding” and “neurotransmitter binding” for Q tract-containing peptides, and “enzyme activator activity” for G tract-containing peptides (Additional file 13).

Discussion

We reanalyzed the Emx gene phylogeny with sequence information from diverse species (hagfish, little skate, spotted gar and coelacanth) from statistical and genomic viewpoints. Our tree inference did not reproduce the extremely high support for the sea lamprey EmxA-EmxB clustering reported in a previous study (NJ bootstrap value, 99.4; ML quartet puzzling support value, 97; [10]). In our analysis, support values for the sea lamprey EmxA-EmxB clustering were only around 50, at the largest (Figure 3a). Moreover, the support for gene duplication in the cyclostome lineage decreased when hagfish sequences were included in the input data set (Additional file 6). This trend was also observed in a probabilistic count of gene duplications (Table 2). Overall, our phylogenetic analysis favored the Emx gene duplication before the cyclostome-gnathostome split (Figure 1a).

Notably, our scan of the multiple sequence alignment of Emx gene products detected homopolymeric amino acid (HPAA) tracts (also known as homopeptides or amino acid tandem repeats) co-occurring between the peptide sequences of sea lamprey EmxA and -B. In our analysis, ClustalW, adopted by the previous study by Tank et al. [10], aligned tightly the HPAA tracts in those sequences, whereas MAFFT and T-Coffee largely relaxed this effect (Additional file 14). The alignment produced by ClustalW, from which non-conserved sites including the HPAAs were deleted, lent strong support of an exclusive clustering of the two lamprey Emx genes (Figure 5b). When the HPAA tracts were excluded prior to alignment (Figure 5a), the support for the lamprey EmxA-EmxB grouping values became as low as that from the datasets prepared with the other alignment programs (Figure 5b). Interestingly, the HPAAs influenced to the alignment in neighboring regions and then to phylogenetic tree inference, only with ClustalW as far as we examined (Figure 5b). Thus, we concluded that the co-occurrence of those HPAA tracts in these two duplicates led to erroneously strong support for the EmxA-EmxB clustering in the previous study [10].

As no information was available for lampreys, we have performed genome-wide quantification of HPAA tracts. Among the three species examined, significant difference was observed in amino acid composition of HPAA tracts, as well as the frequency of HPAA tract-containing peptides (Figure 6). First, our analysis detected the high proportion of poly-Q tracts consisting of no less than twelve amino acids in human. This tendency is probably common among mammals including rodents, according to a previous study (see Figure 1 in [40]) and could have been driven by selection pressure unique to the poly-Q accumulation. Second, when HPAA tracts consisting of no less than six amino acids were quantified, sea lamprey exhibited a unique pattern of HPAA accumulation, with markedly high frequency of peptides containing HPAA tracts consisting of particular amino acids and their compositions with the number of contained homopolymeric amino acids taken into account (Figure 6; Additional files 11 and 12). In this analysis, we paid close attention to false-positive identification of HPAA caused by false prediction of protein-coding regions in the sea lamprey genome, and verified the result with three sequence data sets differently derived. HPAA accumulation should be recognized as a factor misleading lamprey gene phylogeny, together with other factors previously identified, such as high GC-content, codon usage bias and amino acid composition [12,16].

Consistent with the result of our molecular phylogenetic analysis, our synteny analysis supported the one-to-one orthology between cyclostome EmxB and gnathostome Emx2 (Figure 4a). In general, synteny data involving cyclostome genes should be carefully interpreted because not only a certain gene of interest but also its flanking genes should exhibit ambiguous signals to multiple potential orthologs of gnathostomes (reviewed in [14]). In the present study, we identified the Pdzd8 gene in the vicinity of the Emx2 gene; Pdzd8 is present as a single copy (without any paralog that arose in the vertebrate lineage) in all chordate genomes analyzed to date (Figure 4b). For this reason, we assumed that proximity to the Pdzd8 gene could be regarded as a unique signal of orthology to Emx2. In the sea lamprey genome, EmxB and the Pdzd8 ortholog were identified within 0.9 Mbp on the same scaffold (Figure 4a), suggesting orthology between Emx2 and EmxB. We cannot completely rule out the possibility that the Pdzd8 gene experienced an ancient duplication, and that subsequent differential gene loss resulted in paralogy between the gnathostome Pdzd8 and the sea lamprey Pdzd8-like gene in the vicinity of EmxB. However, in addition to the possible EmxB-Emx2 orthology, the EmxA-Emx1 orhology was also suggested by our analysis (see Results). In conclusion, our study favored the common Emx gene duplication and one-to-one orthology of cyclostome EmxA and -B to gnathostome Emx1 and -2, respectively.

We identified two or three Emx homologs in all jawed vertebrates. Although the third homolog has been lost in reptiles, birds, and eutherian mammals, other taxa, including marsupials, have retained Emx3. While mouse Emx2 plays a major role in development of dorsal telencephalon [3], Emx3 has been shown to be the most widely expressed and indispensable Emx homolog in zebrafish [2]. Its orthologs in opossum and Xenopus, which seem to be under less functional constraint as indicated by unique indels in their peptide sequences, remain poorly characterized. It would be intriguing to examine how Emx2 and Emx3 function in marsupials, as the Emx1 ortholog was reported to be pseudogenized at least in opossum [2].

The expression domains of EmxB and Emx2 encompass those of EmxA and Emx1, respectively [1,3,10]. Our results suggest that the similar expression pattern between cyclostome and gnathostome Emx is the consequence of shared ancestry, not convergence. We conclude that the nested expression pattern observed for the duplicated Emx genes was acquired in the common ancestor of all extant vertebrates (Figure 1a). Dorso-ventral subdivision of the pallium by the restricted expression of Emx1/A may thus have been acquired before the divergence between cyclostomes and gnathostomes, as proposed previously [41].

Some differences in expression domains of developmental regulatory genes, including Emx, are observed in developing brains in lamprey and gnathostomes. For instance, the expression of lamprey EmxB at early embryonic stages is expanded more ventrally than that of mouse Emx2 [10], and the onset of FGF signaling in lamprey forebrain occurs at a later stage than in mice [42-44]. Analyses on knock-out mice show that FGF signaling is essential for proper induction of telencephalon and dorsal restriction of Emx2 expression [45-48]. We thus suggest that ventral expansion of the early expression of lamprey EmxB may correspond to the later onset of FGF signaling in this animal. This hypothesis needs to be verified with further analyses, ideally involving hagfish, which represents the indispensable but currently missing link for reconstruction of the brain patterning program in the vertebrate ancestor.

Conclusions

Our analysis, including hagfish Emx genes, suggests the occurrence of the gene duplications giving rise to Emx1, -2 and -3 before the cyclostome-gnathostome split. We propose that independent HPAA tract accumulations in multiple ancient duplicates may have led to erroneous identification of gene duplication in the lamprey lineage. Overall, our reanalysis concluded that the nested Emx expression pattern in mouse and lamprey shares the common origin before the split between the cyclostome and gnathostome lineages. A practical lesson from this study is that potential effect of unique properties of molecular sequences in lamprey can largely be relaxed thorough taxon sampling in other cyclostomes, such as hagfishes.

Abbreviations

A: 

Alanine

Q: 

Glutamine

G: 

Glycine

P: 

Proline

OTU: 

Operational taxonomic unit

KH test: 

Kishino-Hasegawa test

SH: 

Shimodaira-Hasegawa test

NJ: 

Neighbor-joining

ML: 

maximum-likelihood

HPAA: 

Homopolymeric amino acid tract

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Juan Pascual Anaya and Shigeru Kuratani for sequence data production and Yuichiro Hara for insightful discussion in sequence analyses. The authors also thank the little skate and spotted gar genome consortia for sharing the unpublished results of their respective genome sequencing efforts.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Genome Resource and Analysis Unit, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology
(2)
Division of Biology, Hyogo College of Medicine
(3)
Evolutionary Morphology Laboratory, RIKEN
(4)
Phyloinformatics Unit, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies

References

  1. Shimamura K, Hartigan DJ, Martinez S, Puelles L, Rubenstein JL. Longitudinal organization of the anterior neural plate and neural tube. Development. 1995;121(12):3923–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Viktorin G, Chiuchitu C, Rissler M, Varga ZM, Westerfield M. Emx3 is required for the differentiation of dorsal telencephalic neurons. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(8):1984–98.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoshida M, Suda Y, Matsuo I, Miyamoto N, Takeda N, Kuratani S, et al. Emx1 and Emx2 functions in development of dorsal telencephalon. Development. 1997;124(1):101–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Medina L, Abellan A. Development and evolution of the pallium. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20(6):698–711.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Simeone A, Acampora D, Gulisano M, Stornaiuolo A, Boncinelli E. Nested expression domains of four homeobox genes in developing rostral brain. Nature. 1992;358(6388):687–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Simeone A, Gulisano M, Acampora D, Stornaiuolo A, Rambaldi M, Boncinelli E. Two vertebrate homeobox genes related to the drosophila empty spiracles gene are expressed in the embryonic cerebral cortex. EMBO J. 1992;11(7):2541–50.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawahara A, Dawid IB. Developmental expression of zebrafish emx1 during early embryogenesis. Gene Expr Patterns. 2002;2(3-4):201–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Morita T, Nitta H, Kiyama Y, Mori H, Mishina M. Differential expression of two zebrafish emx homeoprotein mRNAs in the developing brain. Neurosci Lett. 1995;198(2):131–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Derobert Y, Plouhinec JL, Sauka-Spengler T, Le Mentec C, Baratte B, Jaillard D, et al. Structure and expression of three Emx genes in the dogfish Scyliorhinus canicula: functional and evolutionary implications. Dev Biol. 2002;247(2):390–404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tank EM, Dekker RG, Beauchamp K, Wilson KA, Boehmke AE, Langeland JA. Patterns and consequences of vertebrate Emx gene duplications. Evol Dev. 2009;11(4):343–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuraku S, Meyer A, Kuratani S. Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: did cyclostomes diverge before or after? Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26(1):47–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith JJ, Kuraku S, Holt C, Sauka-Spengler T, Jiang N, Campbell MS, et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat Genet. 2013;45(4):415–21. 421e411-412.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmann FG, Opazo JC, Storz JF. Gene cooption and convergent evolution of oxygen transport hemoglobins in jawed and jawless vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14274–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuraku S. Impact of asymmetric gene repertoire between cyclostomes and gnathostomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013;24(2):119–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuraku S, Kuratani S. Time scale for cyclostome evolution inferred with a phylogenetic diagnosis of hagfish and lamprey cDNA sequences. Zoolog Sci. 2006;23(12):1053–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Qiu H, Hildebrand F, Kuraku S, Meyer A. Unresolved orthology and peculiar coding sequence properties of lamprey genes: the KCNA gene family as test case. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:325.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Feiner N, Ericsson R, Meyer A, Kuraku S. Revisiting the origin of the vertebrate Hox14 by including its relict sarcopterygian members. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2011;316(7):515–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Flicek P, Ahmed I, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D48–55.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuraku S, Zmasek CM, Nishimura O, Katoh K. aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W22–28.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Q, Arighi CN, King BL, Polson SW, Vincent J, Chen C, et al. Community annotation and bioinformatics workforce development in concert--little skate genome annotation workshops and jamborees, Database (Oxford) 2012. 2012. p. bar064.Google Scholar
  21. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–3.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(8):1164–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59(3):307–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(3):502–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(12):1246–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3497–500.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanchez R, Serra F, Tarraga J, Medina I, Carbonell J, Pulido L, et al. Phylemon 2.0: a suite of web-tools for molecular evolution, phylogenetics, phylogenomics and hypotheses testing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W470–474.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(8):1586–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehta TK, Ravi V, Yamasaki S, Lee AP, Lian MM, Tay B-H, et al. Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:16044–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoff KJ, Stanke M. WebAUGUSTUS--a web service for training AUGUSTUS and predicting genes in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W123–128.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol. 2000;302(1):205–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kishino H, Miyata T, Hasegawa M. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J Mol Evol. 1990;30:151–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Brown GR, Maglott DR. NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D130–135.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–402.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Al-Shahrour F, Díaz-Uriarte R, Dopazo J. FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(4):578–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuraku S. Palaeophylogenomics of the vertebrate ancestor–impact of hidden paralogy on hagfish and lamprey gene phylogeny. Integr Comp Biol. 2010;50(1):124–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mularoni L, Ledda A, Toll-Riera M, Albà MM. Natural selection drives the accumulation of amino acid tandem repeats in human proteins. Genome Res. 2010;20(6):745–54.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Albà MM, Guigó R. Comparative analysis of amino acid repeats in rodents and humans. Genome Res. 2004;14:549–54.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Murakami Y, Uchida K, Rijli FM, Kuratani S. Evolution of the brain developmental plan: Insights from agnathans. Dev Biol. 2005;280(2):249–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Guérin A, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Marrakchi E, Da Silva C, Wincker P, Mazan S, et al. Neurodevelopment genes in lampreys reveal trends for forebrain evolution in craniates. PLoS One. 2009;4(4), e5374.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sugahara F, Aota S-i, Kuraku S, Murakami Y, Takio-Ogawa Y, Hirano S, et al. Involvement of Hedgehog and FGF signalling in the lamprey telencephalon: evolution of regionalization and dorsoventral patterning of the vertebrate forebrain. Development 2011. 2011;138(6)):1217–26.Google Scholar
  44. Uchida K, Murakami Y, Kuraku S, Hirano S, Kuratani S. Development of the adenohypophysis in the lamprey: evolution of epigenetic patterning programs in organogenesis. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2003;300(1):32–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Gutin G, Fernandes M, Palazzolo L, Paek H, Yu K, Ornitz DM, et al. FGF signalling generates ventral telencephalic cells independently of SHH. Development. 2006;133(15):2937–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Hébert JM, Fishell G. The genetics of early telencephalon patterning: some assembly required. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(9):678–85.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Storm EE, Garel S, Borello U, Hebert JM, Martinez S, McConnell SK, et al. Dose-dependent functions of Fgf8 in regulating telencephalic patterning centers. Development. 2006;133(9):1831–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Hebert JM, Lin M, Partanen J, Rossant J, McConnell SK. FGF signaling through FGFR1 is required for olfactory bulb morphogenesis. Development. 2003;130(6):1101–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Computer applications in the biosciences: CABIOS. 1992;8(3):275–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 1994;39(3):306–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Noro et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement