Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis (KW) analyses of morphology by species

From: Divergence at the edges: peripatric isolation in the montane spiny throated reed frog complex

Females Df Anova sum Sq Anova mean Sq Anova F Anova Pr(>F) KW chi-sq KW P
SUL 4 0.079 0.020 5.973 0.001 9.783 0.044
SUL Residuals 32 0.105 0.003     
TL/SUL 4 0.029 0.007 1.766 0.160 6.822 0.146
TL/SUL Residuals 32 0.131 0.004     
HW/SUL 4 0.002 0.001 0.286 0.885 2.119 0.714
HW/SUL Residuals 32 0.065 0.002     
Males Df Anova sum Sq Anova mean Sq Anova F Anova Pr(>F) KW chi-sq KW P
SUL 4 0.116 0.029 7.941 0 17.968 0.001
SUL Residuals 48 0.176 0.004     
TL/SUL 4 0.013 0.003 1.641 0.179 7.307 0.120
TL/SUL Residuals 48 0.094 0.002     
HW/SUL 4 0.037 0.009 1.962 0.115 8.294 0.081
HW/SUL Residuals 48 0.224 0.005     
WGF/SUL 4 0.126 0.032 5.736 0.001 17.323 0.002
WGF/SUL Residuals 47 0.258 0.005     
HGF/SUL 4 0.816 0.204 51.880 <2e-16 40.704 3.10E-08
HGF/SUL Residuals 47 0.185 0.004     
WGF/HGF 4 0.905 0.226 84.290 <2e-16 43.907 6.71E-09
WGF/HGF Residuals 47 0.126 0.003     
  1. Morphological measurement abbreviations are: Snout-Urostyle length (SUL), Tibiafibula Length (TL), Head Width (HW), Gular Flap Width (GFW), Gular Flap Height (GFH). For raw measurements, see Loader et al., submitted