From: Patterns of genetic variation in the endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola L., 1761)
Sampling sites | n | NA | PA (%) | A | HO | HE | FIS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All individuals tested | 313 | 64 | — | 5.818 | 0.430 ± 0.113 | 0.578 ± 0.148 | 0.255 |
Microsatellite dataset I | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 East (North and South) | 151 | 61 | 32 (52.46 %) | 5.546 | 0.532 ± 0.150 | 0.618 ± 0.156 | 0.141 |
  Northeast | 107 | 59 | 20 (33.90 %) | 5.364 | 0.559 ± 0.153 | 0.613 ± 0.164 | 0.089 |
   Russia | 88 | 57 | 13 (22.81 %) | 5.182 | 0.569 ± 0.151 | 0.619 ± 0.159 | 0.082 |
   Belarus + Estonia | 19 | 42 | 2 (4.76 %) | 3.818 | 0.503 ± 0.230 | 0.54 ± 0.207 | 0.095 |
  Southeast(Romania) | 44 | 35 | 2 (5.71 %) | 3.182 | 0.464 ± 0.170 | 0.496 ± 0.139 | 0.065 |
 West | 162 | 32 | 3 (9.38 %) | 2.909 | 0.336 ± 0.161 | 0.439 ± 0.201 | 0.236 |
   France | 73 | 29 | 1 (3.45 %) | 2.636 | 0.389 ± 0.182 | 0.430 ± 0.206 | 0.095 |
   Spain | 89 | 29 | 1 (3.45 %) | 2.636 | 0.291 ± 0.184 | 0.353 ± 0.215 | 0.178 |
Microsatellite dataset II | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 North Dvina | 40 | 54 | 3 (5.56 %) | 4.909 | 0.563 ± 0.188 | 0.618 ± 0.181 | 0.090 |
 West Dvina | 28 | 47 | 2 (4.26 %) | 4.273 | 0.546 ± 0.187 | 0.582 ± 0.185 | 0.064 |
 Volga | 39 | 51 | 2 (3.92 %) | 4.636 | 0.560 ± 0.147 | 0.598 ± 0.146 | 0.065 |
 Charentes | 9 | 25 | — | 2.273 | 0.364 ± 0.223 | 0.409 ± 0.213 | 0.117 |
 Garonne | 44 | 33 | 1 (3.03 %) | 3 | 0.373 ± 0.186 | 0.426 ± 0.205 | 0.128 |
 Adour | 23 | 26 | — | 2.364 | 0.451 ± 0.233 | 0.432 ± 0.198 | −0.045 |
 Cantabrian rivers | 16 | 25 | — | 2.273 | 0.317 ± 0.193 | 0.382 ± 0.252 | 0.176 |
 Ebro | 73 | 29 | — | 2.636 | 0.285 ± 0.185 | 0.337 ± 0.210 | 0.155 |