Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic variability estimates for eleven microsatellite loci tested in the European mink datasets Ia and IIb. The variable provided are: number of individuals tested (n), number of total alleles (NA), the total private allele (PA) with the corresponding percentage in brackets, allelic diversity (A), observed and expected heterozygosities, HO and HE respectively, and mean FIS (Wright’s statistic)

From: Patterns of genetic variation in the endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola L., 1761)

Sampling sites

n

NA

PA (%)

A

HO

HE

FIS

All individuals tested

313

64

—

5.818

0.430 ± 0.113

0.578 ± 0.148

0.255

Microsatellite dataset I

       

 East (North and South)

151

61

32 (52.46 %)

5.546

0.532 ± 0.150

0.618 ± 0.156

0.141

  Northeast

107

59

20 (33.90 %)

5.364

0.559 ± 0.153

0.613 ± 0.164

0.089

   Russia

88

57

13 (22.81 %)

5.182

0.569 ± 0.151

0.619 ± 0.159

0.082

   Belarus + Estonia

19

42

2 (4.76 %)

3.818

0.503 ± 0.230

0.54 ± 0.207

0.095

  Southeast(Romania)

44

35

2 (5.71 %)

3.182

0.464 ± 0.170

0.496 ± 0.139

0.065

 West

162

32

3 (9.38 %)

2.909

0.336 ± 0.161

0.439 ± 0.201

0.236

   France

73

29

1 (3.45 %)

2.636

0.389 ± 0.182

0.430 ± 0.206

0.095

   Spain

89

29

1 (3.45 %)

2.636

0.291 ± 0.184

0.353 ± 0.215

0.178

Microsatellite dataset II

       

 North Dvina

40

54

3 (5.56 %)

4.909

0.563 ± 0.188

0.618 ± 0.181

0.090

 West Dvina

28

47

2 (4.26 %)

4.273

0.546 ± 0.187

0.582 ± 0.185

0.064

 Volga

39

51

2 (3.92 %)

4.636

0.560 ± 0.147

0.598 ± 0.146

0.065

 Charentes

9

25

—

2.273

0.364 ± 0.223

0.409 ± 0.213

0.117

 Garonne

44

33

1 (3.03 %)

3

0.373 ± 0.186

0.426 ± 0.205

0.128

 Adour

23

26

—

2.364

0.451 ± 0.233

0.432 ± 0.198

−0.045

 Cantabrian rivers

16

25

—

2.273

0.317 ± 0.193

0.382 ± 0.252

0.176

 Ebro

73

29

—

2.636

0.285 ± 0.185

0.337 ± 0.210

0.155

  1. aBecause of the low number of samples from Estonia, this locality was analyzed in combination with individuals from Belarus
  2. bResults for the Danube river correspond to those obtained for the southeastern region