Table 1 Comparison of the phylogenetic results obtained in the present study and those of selected previous phylogenies of Sigmodontinae. Authors, loci analyzed, number of sigmodontine species/genera included, method of reconstruction (B: Bayesian; ML: Maximum Likelihood; MP: Maximum parsimony), and measure of nodal support employed (BS: Bootstrap support;, JK: Jackknife; PP: Posterior Probability) are given for each publication. Support values are given for the main clades of the sigmodontine radiation
Authors | Smith and Patton 1999 | Steppan et al. 2004 | D’Elía et al. 2006 | Fabre et al. 2012 | Parada et al. 2013 | Schenk et al. 2013 | Leite et al. 2014 | This study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loci | cytb | c-myc/ BRCA1/GHR /RAG1/ | IRBP | 12S rRNA/BRCA1/CR/COX3/cytb /IRBP/GHR/NAD H1/NADH4/RAG1 /vWF | cytb/IRBP | BRCA1/ GHR/IRBP/RAG1 | cytb/IRBP | cytb/IRBP |
Number spp/genera | 85/38 | 10/10/15 | 39/39 | 231/72 | 72/72 | 76/50 | 66/54 | 269/76 |
Reconstruction Method | MP | ML/B | MP | ML | B | B/ML | B | B |
Support Measure | BS | BS | J | BS | PP | PP/BS | PP | PP |
Clade | ||||||||
Sigmodontinae | 93 | 100/1 | 100 | 99 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 |
Sigmodontalia | --- | 100 | 70-95 | 0.9 | */100 | 1 | 1 | |
Sigmodontini | --- | >95 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 | ||
Oryzomyalia | 100/1 | 100 | 0.99 | */100 | 1 | 1 | ||
Abrotrichini | 79 | --- | 100 | >95 | 1 | */100 | 0.94 | 1 |
Sigmodontinae | 93 | 100/1 | 100 | 99 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 |
Sigmodontini | >95 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 | |||
Sigmodontalia | 100 | 70-95 | 0.9 | */100 | 1 | 1 | ||
Akodontini | --- | 99 | 70-95 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 | |
Oryzomyini | --- | 100 | 70-95 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 | |
Phyllotini | 100 | 89 | >95 | 1 | */99 | 1 | 1 | |
Thomasomyini | --- | 72 | 50-70 | 0.92 | */99 | 0.81 | 1 | |
Phyllotini | 100 | 89 | >95 | 1 | */99 | 1 | 1 | |
Oryzomyini | 100 | 70-95 | 1 | */100 | 1 | 1 | ||
Oryzomyalia | 100/1 | 100 | 0.99 | */100 | 1 | 1 |