Neural reconstruction of bone-eating Osedax spp. (Annelida) and evolution of the siboglinid nervous system
© Worsaae et al. 2016
Received: 4 September 2015
Accepted: 20 March 2016
Published: 14 April 2016
Bone-devouring Osedax worms were described over a decade ago from deep-sea whale falls. The gutless females (and in one species also the males) have a unique root system that penetrates the bone and nourishes them via endosymbiotic bacteria. Emerging from the bone is a cylindrical trunk, which is enclosed in a transparent tube, that generally gives rise to a plume of four palps (or tentacles). In most Osedax species, dwarf males gather in harems along the female’s trunk and the nervous system of these microscopic forms has been described in detail. Here, the nervous system of bone-eating Osedax forms are described for the first time, allowing for hypotheses on how the abberant ventral brain and nervous system of Siboglinidae may have evolved from a ganglionated nervous system with a dorsal brain, as seen in most extant annelids.
The intraepidermal nervous systems of four female Osedax spp. and the bone-eating O. priapus male were reconstructed in detail by a combination of immunocytochemistry, CLSM, histology and TEM. They all showed a simple nervous system composed of an anterior ventral brain, connected with anteriorly directed paired palp and gonoduct nerves, and four main pairs of posteriorly directed longitudinal nerves (2 ventral, 2 ventrolateral, 2 sets of dorso-lateral, 2 dorsal). Transverse peripheral nerves surround the trunk, ovisac and root system. The nervous system of Osedax resembles that of other siboglinids, though possibly presenting additional lateral and dorsal longitudinal nerves. It differs from most Sedentaria in the presence of an intraepidermal ventral brain, rather than a subepidermal dorsal brain, and by having an intraepidermal nerve cord with several plexi and up to three main commissures along the elongated trunk, which may comprise two indistinct segments.
Osedax shows closer neuroarchitectural resemblance to Vestimentifera + Sclerolinum (= Monilifera) than to Frenulata. The intraepidermal nervous system with widely separated nerve cords, double brain commissures, double palp nerves and other traits found in Osedax can all be traced to represent ancestral states of Siboglinidae. A broader comparison of the nervous system and body regions across Osedax and other siboglinids allows for a reinterpretation of the anterior body region in the group.
Siboglinidae is a group of annelids including Frenulata, Vestimentifera and Sclerolinum (the latter two referred to here as Monilifera, see Rouse 2001 ) that can be found at deep-sea reduced environments such as hydrothermal vents and cold-water sulfide/hydrocarbon seeps [2–4]. One of the most recently named Siboglinidae genera is Osedax, described from vertebrate bones [5, 6]. The females possess an elongated trunk with four anterior appendages (termed palps or tentacles, here referred to as palps) and a unique posterior branching structure, a so-called root system, which penetrates the bones and house bacteriocytes . All siboglinids lack a mouth and digestive tract as adults and are dependent on bacterial endosymbionts [7–9]. The slender long body of frenulates is less than one mm wide but more than 50 cm long, while species such as the giant tubeworm, Riftia (Vestimentifera), can reach a length of over a meter [10, 11], whereas the Osedax females are maximally 15 cm long and their dwarf males usually less than one mm in length [6, 12].
The phylogenetic position of Siboglinidae within Annelida is not yet settled [13–19] and various sister groups have been proposed or recovered, e.g., Oweniidae [15, 17, 20, 21], Sabellida [13, 19], Cirratuliformia [22, 23], or Clitellata [18, 24]. Within Siboglinidae, Osedax was initially found to be sister group to Monilifera (Vestimentifera + Sclerolinum) [6, 25–27]. Some recent analyses [28, 29] have placed Osedax as closer to Frenulata, but the placement with Monilifera now seems well supported .
The siboglinid body regions have been described with varying terminology, interpretations and homology arguments [1, 2, 30, 31]. Based on development in vestimentiferans, Bright et al.  reconciled the various siboglinid anatomical terms with those of annelids as follows: 1) the ‘cephalic lobe + forepart’ of frenulates and Sclerolinum, and the ‘vestimentum’ of Vestimentifera consist of the merged prostomium, peristomium and the anterior end of the first chaetiger; 2) the ‘trunk’ of Vestimentifera, Sclerolinum and Frenulates consist of the posterior part of the first chaetiger; and 3) the ‘opisthosoma’ represents the remaining segments (inclusive the last segment = pygidium). Osedax was described with annelid terminology , though no explicit reference to a head was made beyond describing a crown with an oviduct and four pinnule-bearing palps in females. Later descriptions of both dwarf males [12, 28], and bone-eating males and females  mention a prostomium. The palps of Osedax japonicus were suggested to be of prostomial origin , though the exact border of the prostomium and peristomium is not yet established in Osedax and more detailed developmental studies are necessary to confirm their affinity. The palp or palps (or tentacle/tentacles) of Frenulata have been regarded to be either prostomial , or peristomial  based on their origin posterior to the prototroch. Likewise, the vestimentiferan branchial plume has been suggested to be either prostomial , or peristomial [1, 13], or with affinity to the first chaetiger . Regardless the origin and terminology, all siboglinid palps (or tentacles or plumes) have been regarded as homologous structures , though detailed studies on their innervation and nervous connection to the brain is lacking. The forepart of frenulates and Sclerolinum and the vestimentum of Vestimentifera has been proposed homologous to the entire (or at least anterior) Osedax trunk [6, 12, 32, 34, 35]. The posterior root system of Osedax (as well as the internal ovisac) has been proposed homologous to the posterior elongated ‘trunk’ (containing the trophosome) of other siboglinids that likewise contains the bacterial endosymbionts [30, 32, 36]. The posteriormost opisthosoma found in most Siboglinidae is missing or strongly reduced in bone-eating Osedax specimens . In Osedax larvae and dwarf males the two successive dorsal and ventral pairs of posterior opisthosomal chaetae arguably reflect the presence, at least during development, of an opisthosomal region homologous to that of other Siboglinidae [6, 12, 37]. A better understanding of the internal organ systems such as the nervous system may aid in solving homology and terminology issues with regard to siboglinid segments and body regions.
Monilifera and Frenulata possess a similar general outline of their intraepidermal nervous system consisting of a ventral brain, which posteriorly extends into a paired medio-ventral cord, lacking segmental ganglia, except in the opisthosoma [10, 11, 26, 38, 39]. This stands in contrast to the subepidermal nervous system of most Sedentaria, consisting of a dorsal brain connected through the circumesophageal connectives to 1-5 ventral cords, containing a subesophageal ganglion followed by multiple segmental paired ganglia [40, 41]. Unsurprisingly, with the lack of a mouth, gut or obvious trunk segmentation in adult siboglinids, no circumesophageal connectives and stomatogastric nervous system, nor segmental trunk ganglia are found in adults. Furthermore, the nervous system has only been investigated in detail for a few species, mainly based on classic histology and light microscopy studies.
The vestimentiferan nervous system shows following characteristics: a ventral cord originating as a single median cord at the posterior edge of the brain and extending intraepidermally along the midline of the trunk and opisthosoma to the posteriormost end. The cord also contains a pair of giant axons, accommodating fast contraction into the tube. Beneath the ventral ciliated field of the vestimentum, the cord briefly separates into two strands forming a dense plexus of tiny nerves, innervating the ciliary field. In each segment of the opisthosoma, the median cord gives rise to a pair of segmental ring nerves [11, 31, 42–47]. The brain of juvenile Vestimentifera was found to originate dorsally above the transient mouth opening, although the brain of all adult siboglinids is positioned antero-ventrally [48, 49]. The large adult brain shows a central neuropil surrounded by dense ventral as well as dorsal layers of perikarya [11, 31, 43, 44, 46, 47]. The neurites of the dorsal perikarya form the plume nerve bundles, extending anteriorly to the plume lamellae [2, 45]. The cuticle forms a thick shield ventrally, presumably hereby protecting the ventral, intraepidermally positioned brain . A medio-dorsal nerve cord has only been described for Lamellibrachia satsuma Miura, Tsukahara, Hashimoto, 1997 [47, 50], but may be found in other species following similar thorough examinations. There is little knowledge on the receptor cells and peripheral nervous system, which is complicated by the large size of the Vestimentifera. Sclerolinum, the sister group to Vestimentifera within Monilifera, has a similar nervous system, with one medio-ventral cord, producing a wide nerve net underneath the midventral ciliary field along the forepart [26, 51]. Frenulata likewise has a medio-ventral nerve cord extending from the ring-shaped brain commissure in the cephalic lobe to the segmented opisthosoma, where three-segmented ganglia has been described for Siboglinum fiordicum Webb, 1963 [52, 53], possibly innervating the segmental muscles moving the chaetae. The small frenulate Nereilinum murmanicum Ivanov, 1961  differs from other siboglinids in having separate, paired ventral cords along the entire forepart as well as trunk; the nerve net of which innervates the long locomotory mid-ventral ciliary band used for gliding .
The nervous system of the fourth major siboglinid clade, Osedax, has been described for the paedomorphic dwarf males, which have an anterior brain with two commissures, a ring nerve underlying the prototroch and three pairs of ventral and lateral nerves extending along the trunk interconnected by two posterior transverse commissures . Little is known about the female nervous system . The microscopic dwarf males were shown to have an unusual, though very simple nervous system that is not easily compared to other siboglinids or annelid nervous systems . However, the recent description of the secondarily reversed, large males of Osedax priapus Rouse, Wilson, Worsaae, Vrijenhoek, 2015  also gave a glimpse of a more complex nervous system, including a ventral brain and paired ventral cords (suppl. figure S6H-K, ). In the description of female Osedax roseus Rouse, Worsaae, Johnson, Jones, Vrijenhoek, 2008 , the remarkably densely stained serotonergic dorsal nerves were mistakenly taken for ventral cords, which led to a misinterpretation of the dorso-ventral orientation . The correct dorso-ventral axis was established in a following paper  examining the blood vascular system and identifying the forward pumping of blood by a muscular dorsal vessel [57–59]; an orientation later supported by anatomical details on cilia, nerve cords, brain and oviducts matching that of other siboglinids .
With the present paper we aim to describe the adult nervous system of bone-eating Osedax forms, covering the possible variation across four species, visualized with immunoreactivity (IR) of the cytoskeleton and two neurotransmitters gathered with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Complimentary data from TEM and traditional histological LM microscopy are also added. The results are compared with previous data on other siboglinids and the evolution of nervous system within Siboglinidae is discussed. Furthermore, the homology and segmentation of the different body regions in Siboglinidae is interpreted relative to the configuration of their nervous system.
General composition of nervous system
The female nervous system is composed of an anterior, ventral brain (cerebral ganglion) from which originates the following main longitudinal nerves: four pairs of nerves entering the palps, two pairs of ventral nerves, two pairs of dorsal nerves, a pair of anterior oviduct nerves, and a pair of dorso-lateral nerve bundles. The two widely separated ventral cords are connected by a single distinct commissure in the anterior trunk and possibly by an additional commissure in the posteriormost trunk (or nerve net, see below). From the ventral cords project a range of smaller longitudinal nerves and plexi. A sparse peripheral nerve net, which originates from the ventral and dorsal cords, spans the trunk laterally and surrounds the posterior ovisac and root system. With the lack of an intestinal system, no stomatogastric nervous system or remnant thereof were found. The O. priapus male nervous system resembles this configuration, except for having i) two sets of palp nerves for its two palps, ii) anterior nerves not projecting into oviduct (lacking), iii) fewer longitudinal projections from the main longitudinal nerves.
Visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR, serotonin LIR, and FMRFamide LIR as well as histology and TEM
The ventral brain is intraepidermal and consist of a large neuropil, which ventrally and laterally is covered by densely packed perikarya located immediately next to the neuropil; visible with anti acetylated α-tubulin stain in a few specimens (Figs. 2, 5c and 6f).
Only 6-14 perikarya of the multiple brain perikarya were showing serotonin LIR (14 in O. “nudepalp E”, 8 in O. priapus female (10 in male), and 6 in O. “yellow collar”) and an indistinct number of more than 10 perikarya were showing FMRFamide LIR in O. mucofloris Glover, Källström, Smith, Dahlgren, 2005  (not all shown; Figs. 2b, 3, 4a, b, 6d, 8b and 9h).
The neuropil is traversed by two main commissural bundles (anterior and posterior (acbr, pcbr, Fig. 2)) as well as by several minor transverse and decussating neurites (mcc, Fig. 2). It is not possible to follow the individual neurites of the dense neuropil with the data acquired. An attempt to trace the origin within the brain of the main longitudinal nerves is given in the description of each nerve group below. However, future detailed studies including histology are necessary in order to unravel a more exact number of commissures, their detailed configuration, and the precise origin of longitudinal nerves within the brain.
Visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR and in parts by FMRFamide LIR
Each of the four palps (only two in male O. priapus) is innervated by two dense longitudinal nerve bundles, extending from the dorsolateral side of the neuropil of the anterior brain (Fig. 9j) to the distalmost end of the palps (pn1-2, Figs. 1, 2, 4a, b, 5a-e, 6a-b, e-f, 7b, 8a, d-f, 9a-g, i-m). Each dense palp nerve bundle originates as three discrete minor bundles from the anterior brain commissure, the posterior brain commissure and the lateral neuropil, respectively (Fig. 2). The separate origins within the brain suggest the presence of multiple neural functions such as motorneural control of palp musculature and ciliary beating as well as sensing of environmental cues. The three sets of nerves originating in the brain are gathered into two main bundles, lining each side of the palp. One of these nerve bundles (pn1, Fig. 8c) extends along the abfrontal palp side, from which minor transverse nerves project around the palp to the frontal surface, where numerous perpendicularly positioned pinnules are located. In each of these pinnules, a sensory neuron with a distally positioned perikaryon runs from the externally ciliated distal tip (ct, Fig. 8e) and along the central core before seemingly connecting with the transverse palp nerves at the base of the pinnules (Figs. 4c-e and 5a in ; and in O.”yellow collar” Fig. 8c). A second palp nerve (pn2, Fig. 8c) runs laterally underneath the one lateral, metachronously beating, ciliary band (out of two), which in fact are continuous around the palp tip. Specific innervation of the ciliary band could not be traced, with the acetylated α-tubulin IR in the small nerves being indistinguishable from the IR of cilia (no serotonin- or FMRFamide LIR were found in these small nerves).
Ventral nerves (and projections from these)
Visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR, and in parts by serotonin LIR & FMRFamide LIR
The main nerve bundles of the ventral cords continue straight along the trunk (svn, Figs. 1a, b, 4d, i and 8b, g), with a few neurites decussating to meet the contralateral cord one-third down the trunk length (cvn, Figs. 1a, b, 4d, i and 8b, g, not shown for O. “nudepalp E” and not distinguishable in O. priapus). A midventral ciliary nerve plexus between the ventral cords (possibly disguising the decussating neurites) is found in O. priapus underneath its midventral ciliary field (vp, vcf, Fig. 7d, e, i); neither of which are present in any of the other examined species. Some minor neurite bundles project shortly from the main ventral bundles (not in female O. priapus), all terminating in the middle part of the trunk: i) one pair projects latero-posteriorly, anterior of the anterior trunk commissure (vcp, Figs. 1a, b, 2, 3, 4a, 5a, c, d, 6f, 8f and 9c); ii) one pair projects medially, posterior of the anterior trunk commissure (mn, Figs. 1a, 4a, b, 5d and 8f, g); iii) further posterior, one or two pairs project latero-posteriorly and meet dorsally in the middle trunk (vcpp, Figs. 1a, b and 8h). In the posteriormost trunk, the main ventral cords approach the contralateral nerve midventrally, forming a loose commissural nerve net (vpnn, Fig. 1a and 4e), from which project numerous transverse neurites, encircling the posterior trunk (rtn, Figs. 1, 4d, e, f, 6a and 8h). From this loose bundle of circular nerves (intermixing with circular peripheral nerves found densely distributed along the entire trunk) several short longitudinal nerves extend posteriorly (oln, Figs. 1a, c, 4a, e, f, 6a, 7j and 8h), possibly innervating the longitudinal muscles likewise condensed into bundles in the posteriormost trunk (Fig. 4a, in ). Several peripheral nerves encircle the trunk at the border to the ovisac (ron, Figs. 1a, c, 4a and 8h), through which the small longitudinal nerves (oln) extend across the anterior ovisac; together these nerves create a loose peripheral posterior nerve net, spanning the ovisac and roots (Figs. 1a, c, 4a, e, f, 6a, 7j and 8h).
Whereas all ventral nerves and commissures show acetylated α-tubulin IR, only the main ventro-lateral longitudinal nerves and the main bundles of the ventral cords as well as the posterior trunk ring nerve show FMRFamide LIR (ron, vc, vln, Figs. 1c and 4a-d). The main ventral nerve bundles and most of their projections showed serotonin LIR (cvn, rtn, vcp, vcpp, Figs. 1b, 3, 5d, e, 6a-c, 7a, b, i, k and 8a, b, h), but no signal was found in the ventro-lateral nerves or the circular commissural trunk nerves (rtn).
Visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR, and in parts by serotonin LIR & FMRFamide LIR
A pair of dorsal nerve bundles originates from the anterior and posterior ventral brain commissures (in O. “yellow collar” most processes are from the posterior brain commissures) and extend antero-dorsally around the prostomial edge (adn, Figs. 1, 2, 5a-c, e, 6e, f and 9a-c). Dorsally, these nerve bundles split into three nerves: one short pair connecting with the anterior oviduct nerve; one pair running ipsilaterally across the anterior trunk and continuing straight along the entire dorso-lateral side of the trunk (ddn, only visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR and not found in O. “yellow collar” and O. priapus; Figs. 1a, 5b and 6b, e); and one mid-dorsal pair continuing straight underneath the oviduct to the posterior trunk ring nerve (dn, showing IR against all nerve stains; Figs. 1, 3, 4a-d, g, h, 5b, d-f, 6a-c, e, 7h, 8a, b, d, e, h and 10a). The closely positioned mid-dorsal nerves are interconnected ventral of the oviduct by numerous transverse neurites, projecting from the chain of perikarya lining each dorsal nerve and showing bright serotonin LIR (Figs. 1, 3, 4g, h, 6a-c, 7h and 8a). In the anteriormost and posteriormost part of the dorsal nerve cords are found two dense serotonergic nerve plexi (ann and dpnn, Figs. 1a, 4f, g, h, 7k and 8h), possibly interconnecting with the loose circular nerves extending from the ventral side of the posteriormost trunk (rtn, Figs. 1b, 4d, g, h, 6a and 8h).
Anterior oviduct nerves
Visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR, serotonin LIR & FMRFamide LIR
On each lateral side of the brain, posterior of the eight palp nerves, a pair of anterior oviduct nerves (aon, Figs. 1a-b, 2, 4d, 5b, e, 6a, b, e, 8e, h and 10a) originates from the brain connectives (con, Fig. 2). They extend laterally around the anterior trunk, before they on the dorsal side make a 90 degrees turn in anterior direction, connect with the one projection of the antero-dorsal nerves, and continue along the free part of the anterior oviduct to its tip. At the tip the neurite bundles fan out with several of the highly serotonergic neurites connecting to externally ciliated sensory cells (Fig. 5b).
Visualized with acetylated α-tubulin IR, and in parts by FMRFamide LIR
A conspicuous pair of dorso-lateral nerves (dln, Figs. 1a, c, 2, 3, 4a, c, 5a-e, 6e, f, 7g, 8e-g, 9d-g, i and 10b) originates at the posterior brain commissure (Figs. 2, 8f and 9f, g, i). Each dorso-lateral nerve bundle extends laterally from the brain (posterior of the oviduct nerves), and continues laterally around the anterior trunk, where after they split up into four-five dorso-lateral longitudinal nerves on each dorso-lateral side (dln1-5, Figs. 1a, c, 2, 3, 4a, 5a-e, 6e-f, 7b, g, 8e, f). The two ventralmost nerves underline the dorso-lateral ciliary band of the trunk (dln1-2), whereas the two-three dorsalmost nerves (dln3-5) all proceed around the lateral sides to meet up dorsally with the dorsal longitudinal nerves (dn) and continue alongside these dorso-posteriorly to the posteriormost trunk (Figs. 1a, c, 5b, e, 6e and 7g). In the smaller sized species O. priapus, only three dorso-lateral nerves could be traced (in both males and females) that all continue dorsally (Figs. 3 and 7b). The nerves are visualized only with acetylated α-tubulin IR, except for the two ventralmost ones, also seen with FMRFamide LIR.
Comparison of nervous systems among female Osedax spp.
There are only slight differences in neural architecture among the various studied species, which all possess the main longitudinal nerve bundles (vc, vln, dln, dn) and the brain- and anterior trunk commisures (cvc). However, some of the minor projections and peripheral nerves could not be located in all species. In particular the crossing neurites of the main ventral nerves (cvn), the circular neurite bundles in posterior trunk (ctn, rtn), the median nerve (mn) and the posterior processes of the main ventral nerves (vcpp) could not be located in O. “nudepalp E” and Osedax priapus. Osedax priapus females further differ by the absence of ventral cord projections (though the male has these), and by the presence of a ventral plexus underlying the ventral ciliary field in the trunk (vp, vcf, Fig. 7d, e). Despite the nerve plexus (innervating the ciliary field) originates from the ventral cords, the overall similarity in numbers and configuration of ventral cords, however, indicates that the ventral and ventro-lateral longitudinal nerves themselves are not closely functionally linked with the absence/presence of a midventral ciliary field. This connection was otherwise suggested (but not shown) between the paramedian longitudinal nerves and the midventral ciliary band in some interstitial annelids [40, 60].
Comparison of nervous systems among female Osedax, bone-eating males of O. priapus and dwarf males of Osedax spp.
Contrary to the commonly found microscopic dwarf males, the bone-eating male O. priapus is somewhat similar in size and anatomy to the females, though showing only two palps (not four), a spermioduct instead of an oviduct and a testis sac instead of an ovisac. The male nervous system in the head and trunk of O. priapus is likewise very similar to females, except for males having only four neurite bundles all originating at the dorsal neuropil of the anterior brain (Fig. 3) rather than having eight bundles originating along both the dorsal and lateral sides of the anterior brain (Figs. 7b, e and 9i). Furthermore, the seminal vesicle is innervated via anterior seminal neurite bundles extending from the median paired serotonergic perikarya in the brain (asn, Fig. 3) and forming dense nerve net in the wall of the seminal vesicle (snn, Fig. 3) possibly homologous to the anterior oviduct nerves found in females.
The dwarf male nervous system was previously described by immunocytochemistry and CLSM  and despite the great size difference of the microscopic males, their nervous system seemingly shows several homologous traits with that of bone-eating Osedax forms: For instance, the dwarf male nervous system comprises an anterior ventral brain with two commissures, connected to paired ventral, ventro-lateral, dorso-lateral and dorsal longitudinal nerves (though the dorsal nerves could not be traced along the mid-trunk). Besides the similar number of main cords, the most striking resemblance is the anterior decussating neurites of the ventral cord (Figs. 1, 11, fig. 6 in ). The homology of the transverse commissures is less easy to depict, but the first posterior trunk commissure may resemble the posterior trunk commissure in females (Figs. 1, 11, fig. 6 in ). The anterior trunk commissure (cvc) found in all females and O. priapus males, was not found in dwarf males. With the fewer neurites generally found in dwarf males it may be overlooked, or lacking. However, there is an anterior nerve ring beneath the anterior ciliary bands (prototroch). We do not consider this homologous to the more posteriorly located cvc commissure of females, since the dwarf male nerve ring seems closely related to their prototroch ciliary patches. Moreover, similar prototroch nerve rings with similarly associated posterior perikarya are found in CLSM studies of other annelid larvae [61, 62].
Comparison with nervous systems of other Siboglinidae
The present study shows that the two longitudinal nerves of each Osedax palp arise from the anterior- and, to a lesser degree, the posterior brain commissures. With the uncertain phylogenetic position of Siboglinidae, and the lack of mouth, gut and accordingly circumesophageal connectives, it is not possible to homologize the brain commissures in Osedax with the dorsal and ventral commissures found in most other annelids . Two longitudinal nerves have been found in each of the so-called tentacles of some vestimentiferan Riftia, Ridgeia and Lamellibrachia luymesi van der Land and Nørrevang, 1975 [11, 42, 63], supporting their homology to Osedax palps, though their innervation has not been traced to the brain commissures. In the frenulates studied to date, only one nerve has been found in each also so-called tentacle [38, 64], underlining their presumably more distant relationship to Osedax, though presumably still being homologous to annelid palps sensu Orrhage and Müller .
Osedax specimens have two main (and several minor) brain commissures and one anterior trunk commissure arguably homologous to the supra- and subesophageal ganglia, respectively, found in most annelids. The vestimentiferan Riftia likewise show two main brain commissures, which fuse with the single commissure of the subesophageal ganglion during development [45, 48]. Frenulates have only one broad brain commissure and lack a subesophageal ganglion in both larval and adult stages. Further developmental and detailed histological studies are warranted to fully address the commissural configuration and homology across Siboglinidae as well as annelids in general. With a better understanding of the brain commisures, the exact origin and homology of palps and longitudinal nerves can be assessed.
Evolution of the siboglinid nervous system
The most parsimonious reconstructions of the neuromorphological characters (listed in Table 1) were traced (in MacClade 4.08a) on a consensus phylogeny for Siboglinidae, based on various phylogenetic results (Osedax , Vestimentifera , Frenulata [1, 16], interrelationship of these clades , and other Sedentaria that served as outgroups [13, 18, 19] (Fig. 11). Since Osedax only has a few segments, we found it most relevant to compare the details with those of late larval stages in outgroup taxa, when they have similarly few segments. Furthermore, the metatrochophore (in comparison to adults) has all basic body parts of annelids: prostomium + peristomium + larval segments + pygidium, whereas in adults of e.g., Sabellida the prostomium and peristomium fuse [13, 65]. For both of the two serpulid terminals shown in Fig. 11, the nervous system has been studied using comparable immohistochemical methods [61, 62].
Only unambiguous transformations (in 10 of the 16 characters) along the main siboglinid branches are discussed here (see Fig. 11). Only one unambiguous transformation supports Siboglinidae: character 1, the shift from dorsal to ventral position of the brain. The possible loss of a ganglionated cord (character 6) within Siboglinidae could not be traced unambiguously, since many siboglinids have not been investigated in such details to assess presence or absence (Table 1). Also, ganglionated cords are not consistently found in annelids , so the character transformation is further dependent on the choice of outgroup, which is as yet unresolved for Siboglinidae. The intraepidermal nervous system with widely separated nerve cords, double brain commissures, and double palp nerves and numerous other traits found in Osedax were all traced as plesiomorphic states for Siboglinidae, though not consistently present in all siboglinids (see Table 1, last row). Two unambiguous transformations characterize Frenulata: character 2, loss of subesophageal ganglion, and character 4, fusion of two brain commissures into one broad single commissure. Only one unambiguous transformation respectively characterized the Osedax + Monilifera clade (character 14, loss of median ventral nerve), Monilifera itself (character 10, fusion of widely separate cords into a single cord in the second body segment), and Vestimentifera (character 5, formation of a massive dorsal layer of the perikarya in the brain). For Osedax we traced four unambiguous transformations: character 7, decussating neurites of the ventral nerve cords; character 11, fusion of the two ventral cords into one in the third body segment; character 12, loss of giant axons; character 13, formation of multiple ventro-lateral nerve processes in the trunk.
With the few apomorphic states supporting the main clades, it is clear that a neurophylogeny would not alone be able to resolve the interrelationships of Siboglinidae. Also, the reconstruction depends on the topology and outgroups of the phylogenetic tree on which the characters are mapped, some of which are still debated. However, this was the first attempt within Annelida to assess neurophylogenetic characters and states. Several of these could be reconstructed unambiguously, thus providing significant information on transformations of the nervous system within Siboglinidae.
Definition of segment borders and regions across different species and sexes of Osedax
Based on the presence of one pair of ganglia or one major commissure per segment, the general configuration of the nervous system, and the four pairs of chaetae found in dwarf males, we argue for the following body regionalization and up to three body segments being present in Osedax (Fig. 11): i) Fused prostomium and peristomium containing the brain with two main commissures, prototroch nerve ring underlying the prototroch (in larvae and dwarf males ), and palps innervated by nerves originating at the brain commissures (in females and male O. priapus); ii) First body segment containing the anterior trunk with an anterior commissure of the ventral cord (in females), and posterior to this, either a characteristic crossover of the ventral cords (found in all dwarf males  and most Osedax females or in O. priapus female a ventral nerve net underlying a ventral ciliary field; iii) Second body segment, which in the larval/dwarf male stage comprises a first set of chaetae as well as a ganglion, and in the females comprises a posterior trunk commissure (no chaetae) as well as possibly the ovisac and roots; iiii) Third trunk segment found in dwarf males containing a second set of chaetae and a terminal commissure (plus a telotroch posteriorly), which may resemble the first opisthosomal segment in other siboglinids. This contrasts with our previous intepretation of Osedax dwarf males as having only a total of two segments . In females no opisthosomal or trunk chaetae have been found to date, and their posterior ovisac and roots may resemble either a posterior part of the second trunk segment in dwarf males or a third segment, though with no clear indication of segment borders (no ganglia and no dissepiments found in this part).
Homology of body regions and segmentation in Siboglinidae
The prostomium and peristomium is not easily distinguished from the body segments in adult Siboglinidae, and the exact homology is not obvious. In Osedax we suggest that the anteriormost part of the body represents the fused prostomium + peristomium, again corresponding to the cephalic lobe seen in Frenulata and Sclerolinum (in accordance with [2, 26, 31], as well as the anteriormost part of the vestimentum in Vestimentifera . The latter statement agrees with Rouse, 2001  and with Bright et al. 2013 , which shows that they at least contain this region during development. All groups carry palps (sometimes referred to as tentacles) and a ventral brain in this region (Fig. 11a-i). A posterior demarcation of this region (prostomium + peristomium) is externally indistinguishable in all Siboglinidae, lacking a constriction, though a mouth opening may be present in larval stages. The external morphology of this region is relatively simple in Osedax larvae, only showing an apical tuft and a prototroch , whereas Vestimentifera and Frenulata larvae also show a mouth opening [31, 33, 67, 68], and frenulate larvae and adults possess phaosomes [68, 69]. Internally, the larvae (and dwarf males of Osedax) contain a prototrochal commissure (with associated paired dorsal and ventral ganglia found in Frenulata (Fig. 11b)), and all adult Siboglinidae possess a conspicious ventral brain ([12, 26, 31, 43, 49, 55, 64, 68], this study). In larvae of Riftia (Vestimentifera) this here suggested prostomial/peristomial region was shown to be posteriorly demarcated by the septa of the following first body segment, having a separate coelomic cavity . Unfortunately, for all other Siboglinidae the coelomic cavities are either unstudied, less clearly interpreted, or as for Frenulata showing a different configuration [2, 31]. No cell lineage studies or gene expression studies have been performed of Siboglinidae, but studies of the annelids Platynereis [70, 71], Hydroides and Capitella  all confirm the presence of a proliferating stomodaeal region separate from the prostomium as well as the first body segment.
The first body segment develops posterior to the peristomium, and while the exact border between these two can be difficult to detect, we argue that the first segment of bone-eating Osedax is easily recognized by the presence of a pair of subesophageal ganglia/commissure, even though chaetae are missing [40, 60] (Fig. 11g-i). We further suggest that the first body segment in siboglinids is constituted by the forepart in Frenulata and Sclerolinum (following Rouse , but conflicting with Bright et al. , who claims that the first body segment also includes some of the trunk). The first segment is, moreover, equivalent to the middle part of the vestimentum in Vestimentifera (again in accordance with Rouse , but again disagreeing with Bright et al. , because they find the first segment to also include part of the trunk) [1, 26, 31], and lastly this is homologous to the middle part of the trunk in Osedax  (this study, Fig. 11g-i). Our proposed homology and demarcation of the first segment is supported by the present finding of an anterior commissure (cvc, =subesophageal ganglion) in the anterior trunk of bone-eating Osedax, as well as by the recovered ventral ciliary field with an underlying nerve net in Osedax priapus, similar to what has been reported for Vestimentifera, Sclerolinum and possibly the larvae of Frenulata [2, 26, 29, 68]. A presumed homologous subesophageal ganglion is found in Vestimentifera (fuses with the brain during develoment) and other annelids (e.g., [40, 45, 48, 61, 62] this study, Table 1, Fig. 11), though not reported for Sclerolinum , and in Frenulata may instead be represented by a ring nerve [55, 64].
The second body segment comprises the posterior part of the trunk in Osedax, demarcated by one pair of chaetae and a prominent commissure with ganglia in dwarf males, or by a posterior trunk ring nerve in the bone-eating forms (Fig. 11). In bone-eating forms this segment has previously been referred to as ‘trunk base’ or ‘lower trunk’ and it may extend into the ovisac (e.g., [29, 56]). We suggest it to be homologous to the trunk in Frenulata, Sclerolinum and Vestimentifera [2, 26], which in Vestimentifera has 1-2 pairs of chaetae (anterior capillary chaetae are lost during development) [12, 26, 55, 64, 68]. A homology to the Osedax dwarf male ganglia or posterior trunk commissure have not been found in other adult Siboglinidae, however, a single ganglion is present in frenulate larvae . Our neuromorphological regionalization is further supported by other anatomical features such as presence of a second coelomic cavity delineated by dissipiments in larval stages of both Frenulata and Vestimentifera , as well as the presence of gonads and the trophosome in this segment in all adult Siboglinidae [2, 10, 11, 38, 43, 46]. However, this interpretation contradicts the regionalization suggested by Bright et al.  according to which, the trunk together with the forepart/vestimentum constitutes the first body segment and not a separate second segment.
The third body segment in most siboglinids equals the first segment of the opisthosomal region [2, 10, 11, 38], characterized by opisthosomal chaetae in all siboglinids except the bone-eating forms of Osedax, and is further characterized by a telotroch in larvae of Osedax and Frenulata [66, 68]. Developmental studies are necessary in order to clarify whether the ovisac and roots in bone-eating forms of Osedax likewise represent a third segment (or more) rather than a second segment, similar to the dwarf males. The hooked chaetae in Osedax dwarf males are all similar, whereas other siboglinids may show modified opisthosomal compared to trunk chaetae [12, 26, 55, 64, 68]. Neural architecture in the third segment comprises a terminal commissure in Osedax dwarf males , a pair of ganglia in Frenulata , broadening of the ventral nerve cord in Sclerolinum , or a neural circular bundle in Vestimentifera . This organization is repeated in the following opisthosomal segments of other Siboglinidae, if present.
The female Osedax nervous system revealed many similarities to the nervous system of other Siboglinidae but also differed in term of the presence of multiple, widely-separated longitudinal nerves, extending throughout the trunk, and by their lack of giant axons and a segmented opistosomal region. Moreover, the present, first, broader comparison of nervous system across Osedax and Siboglinidae has led to new proposed homologies of the ambiguous, and much debated, anterior segments in Siboglinidae - with Osedax females (and O. priapus males) suggested to comprise two in the trunk. Osedax dwarf males are here suggested to have three body segments in total (in contrast to the two interpreted as in ). This is also the first neurophylogenetic study performed on annelids and Siboglinidae, leaving several transformations unambigously reconstructed at the deep nodes. The reconstruction did reveal that the Osedax intraepidermal nervous system with multiple, widely separated nerve cords, double brain commissures, double palp nerves are siboglinid plesiomorphies; hereby bridging the evolutionary gap to non-siboglinid annelids and enhancing our understanding of the neural evolution within Siboglinidae.
For recruitment of female Osedax mucofloris, cow and whale bones were placed at 125 m depth off the coast of Tjärnö, Sweden, and successfully retrieved in 2009 , in close vicinity to a minke whale carcass sunk in October 2003 . All necessary permits were obtained for the described whale fall experiment; received from Karin Pettersson at the County Administrative Board Västra Götalands Län, October 2003. The presently undescribed Osedax “yellow collar” was sampled in November 2009 in Monterey Bay, California (CA), the USA, at 385 m depth from a gray whale skeleton. Osedax priapus (males and females) were collected from bones of a northern fur seal and a northern elephant seal that were deployed in Monterey Canyon, CA, the USA, in 2009, and cow bones deployed at Hydrate Ridge, Oregon, in 2011 . All bones were placed at 600-800 m depth. Collections of the undescribed O. “nudepalp E”, were made on specimens living on whale skeletons deployed at 683-1820 m depth in Monterey Bay, CA, the USA  in 2002-2006 . O. “yellow collar” and O. “nudepalp E” are separate undescribed phylogenetic entities as revealed by a molecular phylogeny .
Animals were carefully anesthetized with magnesium chloride (7 %) in seawater, ratio 1:1, and then dissected from the bone. Specimens for immunohistochemistry were fixed in fridge overnight in 4 % paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5 % sucrose. Samples were rinsed 5-7 times and stored in PBS-buffer (with 5 % sucrose and 0.05 % NaN3). Specimens for histology and TEM were fixed in 3 % glutaraldehyde in 0,1 M cacodylate buffer with 5 % sucrose and later postfixed in 1 % osmium for 1,5 hours.
TEM, histology & LM photography
Prior to embedding in Spurr’s resin, specimens were dehydrated in alcohol series using standard protocol and thereafter polymerized for 20-24 hours at 50 °C. The block was trimmed to the object and sectioned into semithin (600-700 nm) and ultrathin (50-70 nm) sections using a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome (LEICA MICROSYSTEMS, Wetzlar, Germany). Semi-thin sections were stained with toluidine blue and photographed with an Olympus IX70 light microscope equipped with a digital Olympus camera DP73 using the program Cell (Olympus America Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Ultrathin sections were mounted on slot grids and mesh grids, contrasted with 2 % uranyl acetate- and 4 % lead citrate-solution and examined using a JEOL JEM 1010 and 1011 - Transmission Electron Microscopes (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; belonging to University of Copenhagen and Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Science, respectively) equipped with a digital camera GATAN OneView (GATAN, INC., Pleasanton, CA, United States) and digital camera MEGA VIEW-III (Olympus America Inc., Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
Immunohistochemical staining of muscles, nerves and cilia of two or more specimens of each species were performed synchronously as triple or double staining. The following antibodies and fluorochromes were employed for indirect and direct triple stainings: phalloidin labeled with FITC (0,17 μM and 0,33 μM stock solution in PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), or Alexa Fluor® 488 (0,33 μM stock solution in PBS; Invitrogen, Eugen, OR, USA); monoclonal mouse acetylated α-tubulin (final concentration 1:400; Sigma-Aldrich, T6793) (with CY5 labeled secondary antibody directed against mouse; Jackson Immuno-Research, West Grove, PA, USA); polyclonal rabbit anti serotonin (diluted 1:400; Sigma-Aldrich, S5545) and anti FMRFamide (diluted 1:100; Immunostar, Hudson, WI, USA, 20091) (both with TRITC-labeled secondary antibody directed against rabbit (Sigma-Aldrich, T5268)). The staining combinations (1:1) were acetylated α-tubulin/serotonin and acetylated α-tubulin/FMRFamide followed by direct phalloidin staining.
Samples were preincubated for at least 2 hours in PTA (PBS + 0.1 % Triton-X, 0.05 % NaN3, 0.25 % bovine serum albumin, and 10 % sucrose). Afterwards, samples were incubated for up to 24 hours at 4 °C in the primary antibodies mixed 1:1, both made with PTA. The samples were then thoroughly washed through several shifts with PTA over 6 hours and then incubated overnight at 4 °C in the two respective secondary antibodies conjugated with fluorochromes and mixed in PTA. The third day samples were again rinsed thoroughly over 4 hours with PTA and then incubated in phalloidin (in PBS without NaN3), either labeled with FITC (SIGMA P-5282) or Alexa flour 488 (Invitrogen A12379)(0,33 μM), for one hour. Samples were then rinsed 2-3 hours in PBS and before mounting taken through a series of increasing concentration of mounting media Vectashield® with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Specimens were mounted on an object glass between two cover slips, so that they could be turned and scanned from both sides.
The same approach was used for double staining, except the direct phalloidin staining was excluded. The phalloidin staining was generally not shown for this study.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Preparations were investigated with a Leica TCS SP5 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (SUND & SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen) performing Z-stacks of images (series of images through Z-plane of specimen stacked together), which were later carefully analyzed in order to reconstruct the nervous system using the Leica LASAF computer software and Imaris software (Bitplane, Concord, MA, USA), respectively. Maximum intensity and depth-coded 2D projections of Z-stacks were likewise constructed by help of these programs and later optimized for contrast and level in Adobe Photoshop CS 5.1 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). Drawings were performed with Adobe Illustrator CS6.
We thank the Bob Vrijenhoek and crews of RV Western Flyer and ROV Doc Ricketts of the Monterey Bay Aquarium and Research Institute for assistance and their continuous help in collecting the material [29, 57, 66]. Veronica Colmander, Martin MacNaughton, and Randi Huusgaard are thanked for their early assistance with these Osedax studies. We greatly appreciate the detailed comments on the manuscript from two anonymous reviewers. The Faculty of Science and Health, University of Copenhagen, are thanked for facilitating Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and CLSM and the Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Science, are thanked for further TEM analyses. The collecting of O. mucofloris and the CLSM, EM and TEM work was financed by a Freja fellowship (University of Copenhagen) and other later fundings of KW. NRK was supported in part by several grants: TEM investigations were done with support by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (#12-04-31427 mol_a), travel expanses in February 2015 were supported by the Russian Scientific Fund (#14-50-00029) and in August 2015 by MARS Travel Award for Young Scientists 2015.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Rouse GW. A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 (Polychaeta, Annelida): formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera. Zool J Linn Soc. 2001;132:55–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Southward EC, Schulze A, Gardiner SL. Pogonophora (Annelida): form and function. Hydrobiologia. 2005;535–536:227–51.Google Scholar
- Miyake H, Tsukahara J, Hashimoto J, Uematsu K, Maruyama T. Rearing and observation methods of vestimentiferan tubeworm and its early development at atmospheric pressure. Cah Biol Mar. 2006;47:471–5.Google Scholar
- Bright M, Klose J, Nussbaumer AD. Giant tubeworms. Curr Biol. 2013;23:R224–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goffredi SK, Paull CK, Fulton-Bennett K, Hurtado LA, Vrijenhoek RC. Unusual benthic fauna associated with a whale fall in Monterey Canyon, California. Deep Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2004;51:1295–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rouse GW, Goffredi SK, Vrijenhoek RC. Osedax: bone-eating marine worms with dwarf males. Science. 2004;305:668–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goffredi SK, Orphan VJ, Rouse GW, Jahnke L, Embaye T, Turk K, et al. Evolutionary innovation: a bone-eating marine symbiosis. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1369–78.Google Scholar
- Nussbaumer AD, Fisher CR, Bright M. Horizontal endosymbiont transmission in hydrothermal vent tubeworms. Nature. 2006;441:345–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goffredi SK, Johnson SB, Vrijenhoek RC. Genetic diversity and potential function of microbial symbionts associated with newly discovered species of Osedax polychaete worms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2314–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Southward EC. Pogonophora. In: Harrison F, Westfall J, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 12: Onychophora, Chilopoda, and Lesser Protostomata. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1993. p. 327–69.Google Scholar
- Gardiner S, Jones M. Vestimentifera. In: Harrison F, Rice M, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 12: Onychophora, Chilopoda, and Lesser Protostomata. 1993.Google Scholar
- Worsaae K, Rouse GW. The simplicity of males: dwarf males of four species of Osedax (Siboglinidae; Annelida) investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Morphol. 2010;271:127–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rouse GW, Fauchald K. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool Scr. 1997;26:139–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bleidorn C, Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T. A contribution to sedentary polychaete phylogeny using 18S rRNA sequence data. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2003;41:186–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rousset V, Rouse GW, Siddall ME, Tillier A, Pleijel F. Cladistics 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and morphological data. Cladistics. 2004;20:518–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halanych KM. Molecular phylogeny of siboglinid annelids (a.k.a. pogonophorans): a review. Hydrobiologia. 2005;535–536:297–307.Google Scholar
- Capa M, Hutchings P, Aguado M, Bott N. Phylogeny of Sabellidae (Annelida) and relationships with other taxa inferred from morphology and multiple genes. Cladistics. 2011;27:447–557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andrade SCS, Novo M, Kawauchi GY, Worsaae K, Pleijel F, Giribet G, Rouse GW. Articulating “ archiannelids ”: Phylogenomics and annelid relationships, with emphasis on meiofaunal taxa. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:2860-2875.Google Scholar
- Struck TH, Golombek A, Weigert A, Franke FA, Westheide W, Purschke G, et al. The evolution of annelids reveals two adaptive routes to the interstitial realm. Curr Biol. 2015;25:1993–9.Google Scholar
- Liwanow N, Porfirjewa N. Die Organisation der Pogonophoren und deren Beziehungen zu den Polychäten. Biol Zent Bl. 1967;86:177–204.Google Scholar
- Hilário A, Capa M, Dahlgren TG, Halanych KM, Little CTS, Thornhill DJ, et al. New perspectives on the ecology and evolution of siboglinid tubeworms. PLoS One. 2011;6:1–14.Google Scholar
- Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hosel C, Kube M, et al. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature. 2011;471:95–8.Google Scholar
- Weigert A, Helm C, Meyer M, Nickel B, Arendt D, Hausdorf B, et al. Illuminating the base of the annelid tree using transcriptomics. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:1391–401.Google Scholar
- Zrzavý J, Ríha P, Piálek L, Janouskovec J. Phylogeny of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa): total-evidence analysis of morphology and six genes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:189. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-189.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Glover AG, Källström B, Smith CR, Dahlgren TG. World-wide whale worms ? A new species of Osedax from the shallow North Atlantic. Proc R Soc B. 2005;272:2587–92.Google Scholar
- Eichinger I, Hourdez S, Bright M. Morphology, microanatomy and sequence data of Sclerolinum contortum (Siboglindae, Annelida) of the Gulf of Mexico. Org Divers Evol. 2013;13:311–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Kocot KM, Schander C, Santos SR, Thornhill DJ, Halanych KM. Mitogenomics reveals phylogeny and repeated motifs in control regions of the deep-sea family Siboglinidae (Annelida). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;85:221–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glover AG, Wiklund H, Taboada S, Avila C, Cristobo J, Smith CR, et al. Bone-eating worms from the Antarctic: the contrasting fate of whale and wood remains on the Southern Ocean seafloor. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280:1–10.Google Scholar
- Rouse GW, Wilson NG, Worsaae K, Vrijenhoek RC. A dwarf male reversal in bone-eating worms. Curr Biol. 2015;25:236–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bright M, Lallier FH. The biology of vestimentiferan tubeworms. Oceanogr Mar Biol. 2010;48:213–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bright M, Eichinger I, Salvini-Plawen VL. The metatrochophore of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent vestimentiferan (Polychaeta: Siboglinidae). Org Divers Evol. 2013;13:163–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miyamoto N, Yamamoto T, Yusa Y, Fujiwara Y. Postembryonic development of the bone-eating worm Osedax japonicus. Naturwissenschaften. 2013;100:285–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Southward EC. Development of the gut and segmentation of newly settled stages of Ridgeia (Vestimentifera): implications for relationship between Vestimentifera and Pogonophora. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 1988;68:465–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vrijenhoek RC, Johnson SB, Rouse GW. Bone-eating Osedax females and their “harems” of dwarf males are recruited from a common larval pool. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:4535–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katz S, Klepal W, Bright M. The Osedax Trophosome: Organization and Ultrastructure. Biol Bull. 2011;220:128–139.Google Scholar
- Katz S, Klepal W, Bright M. The skin of Osedax (Siboglinidae, Annelida): An ultrastructural investigation of its epidermis. J Morphol. 2010;271:1272–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vrijenhoek RC, Johnson SB, Rouse GW. A remarkable diversity of bone-eating worms (Osedax; Siboglinidae; Annelida). BMC Biol. 2009;7:74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ivanov AV. Pogonophora. London: Academic Press; 1963.Google Scholar
- Malakhov VV, Galkin SV. Vestimentiferans—The Gutless Invertebrates from Marine Depths. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd.; 1998.Google Scholar
- Orrhage L, Müller MCM. Morphology of the nervous system of Polychaeta (Annelida). Hydrobiologia. 2005;535–536:79–111.Google Scholar
- Purschke G, Bleidorn C, Struck TH. Systematics, evolution and phylogeny of Annelida – a morphological perspective. Mem Museum Victoria. 2014;71:247–69.Google Scholar
- Van der Land J, Norrevang A. Structure and relationships of Lamellibrachia (Annelida, Vestimentifera). Det K Danske Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr. 1977;21:1–102.Google Scholar
- Malakhov VV, Popelyaev I, Galkin S. Microscopic anatomy of Ridgeia phaeophiale Jones, 1985 (Pogonophora, Vestimentifera) and the problem of the position of Vestimentifera in the system of animal kingdom. 2. Integument, nerve system, connective tissue, musculature. Biol Morya. 1996;22:139–47.Google Scholar
- Mamkaev YV, Selivanova RV, Punin MY. Comparative anatomical investigation of the nervous system of Vestimentifera (Pogonophora). Biol Morya. 1999;25:372–82.Google Scholar
- Rimskaya-Korsakova NN, Karaseva NP, Malakhov VV, Galkin SV. Brain and nerve cord of Vestimentifera (Annelida): Comparison with polychaetes. In: 2-nd Congress on invertebrate morphology. Boston, USA. 2011. p. 207.Google Scholar
- Karaseva NP, Malakhov VV, Galkin SV. The morphology and anatomy of the vestimentiferan worm Oasisia alvinae Jones, 1985 (Annelida: Siboglinidae). II. Integument, nervous system and musculature. Russ J Mar Biol. 2012;38:10–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyamoto N, Shinozaki A, Fujiwara Y. Neuroanatomy of the Vestimentiferan tubeworm Lamellibrachia satsuma provides insights into the evolution of the polychaete nervous system. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055151.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jones M, Gardiner S. Evidence for a transient digestive tract in Vestimentifera. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1988;101:423–33.Google Scholar
- Jones ML, Gardiner SL. On the early development of the Vestimentiferan tube worm Ridgeia sp. and observations on the nervous system and trophosome of Ridgeia sp. and Riftia pachyptila. Biol Bull. 1989;177:254–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miura T, Tsukahara J, Hashimoto J. Lamellibrachia satsuma, a new species of vestimentiferan worms (Annelida: Pogonophora) from a shallow hydrothermal vent in Kagoshima Bay, Japan. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1997;110:447–56.Google Scholar
- Ivanov AV, Selivanova RV. Sclerolinum javanicum sp. n., a new pogonophoran living on rotten wood. A contribution to the classification of Pogonophora. Biol Morya. 1992;1–2:27–33.Google Scholar
- Webb M. Siboglinum fiordicum sp. nov. (Pogonophora) from the Raunefjord, western Norway. Sarsia. 1963;13:33–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Southward EC. A study of the structure of the ophistosoma of Siboglinum fiordicum. In: Norrevang A, editor. The phylogeny and systematic position of Pogonophora. Sonderheft Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. Hamburg - Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey; 1975. p. 64–76.Google Scholar
- Ivanov AV. Deux genera nouveaux de pogonophores diplobrachiaux Nereilinum et Siboglinoides. Cah Biol Mar. 1961;2:381–97.Google Scholar
- Bubko O, Minichev Y. Nervous system of Nereilinum murmanicum Ivanov and taxonomic status of Pogonophora. Zool Zhurnal. 1977;56:1277–87.Google Scholar
- Rouse GW, Worsaae K, Johnson SB, Jones WJ, Vrijenhoek RC. Acquisition of dwarf male “harems” by recently settled females of Osedax roseus n. sp. (Siboglinidae; Annelida). Biol Bull. 2008;214:67–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huusgaard RS, Vismann B, Kühl M, Macnaugton M, Colmander V, Rouse GW, et al. The potent respiratory system of Osedax mucofloris (Siboglinidae, Annelida) - A prerequisite for the origin of bone-eating Osedax? PLoS One. 2012;7:1–14.Google Scholar
- Kennedy GY, Phillips Dales R. The function of the heart-body in polychaetes. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2009;37:15–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fransen ME. Coelomic and vascular systems. In: Westheide W, Hermans CO, editors. The ultrasctucture of Polychaeta. Microfauna marina. 1988. p. 199–213.Google Scholar
- Müller MCM, Westheide W. Comparative analysis of the nervous systems in presumptive progenetic dinophilid and dorvilleid polychaetes (Annelida) by immunohistochemistry and cLSM. Acta Zool. 2002;83:33–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDougall C, Chen W-C, Shimeld SM, Ferrier DEK. The development of the larval nervous system, musculature and ciliary bands of Pomatoceros lamarckii (Annelida): heterochrony in polychaetes. Front Zool. 2006;3:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brinkmann N, Wanninger A. Neurogenesis suggests independent evolution of opercula in serpulid polychaetes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:270–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Van der Land J, Nørrevang A. The systematic position of Lamellibrachia (Annelida, Vestimentifera). Zeitschrift für Zool Syst und Evol. 1975;1:86–101.Google Scholar
- Ivanov AV. The nervous system of Pogonophora. Zool Zhurnal. 1958;37:1682–93.Google Scholar
- Rouse G, Fitzhugh K. Broadcasting fables: Is external fertilization really primitive? Sex, size, and larvae in sabellid polychaetes. Zool Scr. 1994;23:271–312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rouse GW, Wilson NG, Goffredi SK, Johnson SB, Smart T, Widmer C, et al. Spawning and development in Osedax boneworms (Siboglinidae, Annelida). Mar Biol. 2009;156:395–405.Google Scholar
- Southward EC. Development of Perviata and Vestimentifera (Pogonophora). Hydrobiologia. 1999; 402:185-202.Google Scholar
- Callsen-Cencic P, Flügel HJ. Larval development and the formation of the gut of Siboglinum poseidoni Flügel & Langhof (Pogonophora, Perviata). Evidence of protostomian affinity. Sarsia. 1995;80:73–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nørrevang A. Photoreceptors of the phaosome (hirudinean) type in a pogonophore. Zool Anz. 1974;193:297–304.Google Scholar
- Dorresteijn AWC, O’Grady B, Fischer A, Porchet-Henner E, Boilly-Marer Y. Molecular specification of cell lines in the embryo of Platynereis (Annelida). Roux’s Arch Dev Biol. 1993;202:260–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steinmetz PRH, Kostyuchenko RP, Fischer A, Arendt D. The segmental pattern of otx, gbx, and Hox genes in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Evol Dev. 2011;13:72–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seaver EC, Thamm K, Hill SD. Growth patterns during segmentation in the two polychaete annelids, Capitella sp. I and Hydroides elegans: comparisons at distinct life history stages. Evol Dev. 2005;7:312–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dahlgren TG, Wiklund H, Källström B, Lundälv T, Smith CR, Glover AG. A shallow-water whale-fall experiment in the north Atlantic. Cah Biol Mar. 2006;47:385–9.Google Scholar
- Braby CE, Rouse GW, Johnson SB, Jones WJ, Vrijenhoek RC. Bathymetric and temporal variation among Osedax boneworms and associated megafauna on whale-falls in Monterey Bay, California. Deep Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2007;54:1773–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knox G. Studies on a New Zealand serpulid Pomatoceros coeruleus, Schmarda, Thesis M Sc, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. 1949. p. 127.Google Scholar
- Orrhage L. On the structure and homologues of the anterior end of the polychaete families Sabellidae and Serpulidae. Zoomorphology. 1980;96:113–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Potswald HE. Abdominal segment formation in Spirorbis moerchi (Polychaeta). Zoomorphology. 1981;97:225–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar