Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative molar area proportion PGLMM regression results for Anthropoidea and subclades

From: The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions

Clade/Model

 

Slope (Interspecific)

 

Intercept

 

λ

  

Mean

lhd

uhd

\(\mathbb {P}\)

 

Mean

lhd

uhd

\(\mathbb {P}\)

 

Mean

lhd

uhd

dic

 

2.00

1.90

2.10

1.000

 

−1.00

−0.90

−1.10

1.000

    

Anthropoidea

 

1.72

1.42

1.99

0.102

 

−0.93

−1.32

−0.51

0.366

 

0.85

0.76

0.92

Platyrrhini

 

2.08

1.51

2.63

0.264

 

−1.30

−1.82

−0.77

0.156

 

0.71

0.37

0.91

Platyrrhini*

 

1.71

1.24

2.13

0.168

 

−0.88

−1.29

−0.42

0.352

 

0.34

<0.01

0.68

Catarrhini

 

1.63

1.28

1.96

0.056

 

−0.79

−1.24

−0.30

0.223

 

0.78

0.65

0.88

Hominoidea

 

0.91

0.17

1.63

0.003

 

0.01

−0.84

0.87

0.011

 

0.21

<0.01

0.73

Cercopithecoidea

 

1.73

1.36

2.11

0.162

 

−0.89

−1.39

−0.36

0.272

 

0.73

0.58

0.85

Colobinae

 

1.31

0.66

1.99

0.034

 

−0.23

−1.10

0.55

0.040

 

0.44

0.08

0.75

Cercopithecinae

 

2.04

1.56

2.51

0.329

 

−1.46

−2.14

−0.78

0.089

 

0.66

0.44

0.81

Cercopithecini

 

0.98

0.59

1.39

<0.001

 

−0.21

−0.76

0.32

0.006

 

0.09

<0.01

0.28

Papionini

 

2.11

1.52

2.77

0.243

 

−1.42

−2.34

−0.51

0.109

 

0.39

<0.01

0.74

  1. Mean; lhd; uhd posterior mean, lower and upper bound 95 % highest density levels
  2. \({\!\!~}^{\mathbb {P}}\)posterior probability of parameter estimate being inside the rope: slope \(\mathbb {P} \in [1.90, 2.10]\), intercept \(\mathbb {P} \in [-0.90, -1.10]\)
  3. *non-callitrichin platyrrhines