Skip to main content

Table 5 Review of redstart responses to foreign eggs

From: The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context

Model

Locality

Number

Ejected (%)

Deserted (%)

Parasitism rate

Reference

Natural cuckoo eggs

 Non-manipulated

Finland NW

46

0

13

31

[24]

 Non-manipulated

Finland E

54

0

13

21

[16]

 Non-manipulated

Finland C

187

0

4

44

[48]

 Non-manipulated

Czech Republic

62

0

6

31

[20]

 Non-manipulated

Finland SE

43

0

19

33

this study

 Cross-fostered

Finland NW

16

0

0

31

[24]

 Cross-fostered

Finland SE

73

0

1

30

this studya

 Conspecific eggs

Finland SE

14

0

0

30

this study

Mimetic models

 Redstart-cuckoo type

Finland NW

16

0

0

31

[24]

 Redstart-cuckoo type

Finland NC

9

11

33

0

[25]

 Redstart-cuckoo type

Finland E

26

4

4

21

[16]

 Redstart-cuckoo type

Finland E

29

3

3

17

[25]

 Redstart-cuckoo type

Great Britain

1

0

0

0

[5]

 Cowbird blue

Finland SE

12

17

17

30

[32]

Non-mimetic models

 Brambling-cuckoo

Finland NW

41

5

7

31

[24]

 Brambling-cuckoo

Finland NC

14

14

36

0

[25]

 Brambling-cuckoo

Finland E

27

41

4

21

[16]

 Brambling-cuckoo

Finland E

37

32

5

17

[25]

 Meadow pipit-cuckoo

Norway C

5

0

20

0

[6]

 Meadow pipit-cuckoo

Great Britain

4

0

0

0

[5]

 Pied wagtail-cuckoo

Great Britain

4

50

0

0

[5]

 Cowbird spotted

Finland SE

13

46

8

30

[32]

 Cowbird immaculate

Finland SE

7

29

0

30

[32]

Non-mimetic natural eggs

 Black complete

Finland SE

22

45

9

30

[34]

 Black spots

Finland SE

17

0

6

30

[34]

 Blue complete

Czech Republic

25

76

0

0

this studyb

 Great tit

Finland SW

7

57

0

0

[50]

 Various species

Finland SW

6

0

0

0

[42]c

 Various species

Finland N

35

31

0

0

[43]d

  1. See original studies for detailed information on the size, colour and maculation of experimental eggs
  2. aSample sizes differ from Table 3 because desertion was not a specific response to parasitism in this treatment (Table 3, Results); therefore we excluded the deserted nests
  3. bSee Methods
  4. cAuthor used natural eggs of the chaffinch, redwing, great tit and wryneck; experimental eggs introduced around hatching time
  5. dAuthor used natural eggs of the brambling, meadow pipit and redpoll; acceptance period was set to 24 h, then the experimental egg was removed