Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptions of the methods used to measure prey conspicuousness

From: Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance

Camouflage Category

Variable Name

Filtering Method

Basic Description

Edge Disruption

GabRat

Gabor Filter

Average ratio of ‘false edges’ (edges at right angles to the prey outline) to ‘salient edges’ (edges parallel with the prey outline). See Additional file 1

VisRat

Canny Edge Detector

Proportion of Canny edge pixels in the prey’s outline region [21]

DisRat

Canny Edge Detector

Proportion of Canny edge pixels in the prey’s outline region [34]

Mean Edge-region Canny Edges

Canny Edge Detector

Proportion of Canny edge pixels in the prey’s outline region.

Edge-intersecting cluster count

None

Count of the number of changes in the pattern around the prey’s outline [33]

Pattern/Object detection

SIFT

Difference-of-Gaussians, Hough Transform

Uses Hough transform to find features in the prey, then counts how many similar features are found in the background [19, 22]

HMAX

Gabor Filter

Breaks down a bank of Gabor Filter outputs into layers that describe patterns with some invariance to scale and orientation [20]

Pattern

PatternDiff

Fourier Bandpass

Sums the absolute difference between the prey’s pattern statistics [42]

Euclidean Pattern Distance

Fourier Bandpass

Euclidean distance between normalised descriptive pattern statistics [42]

Luminance

Mean Backgorund Luminance

Luminance

Mean luminance

Mean Luminance Difference

Luminance

Absolute difference between mean prey and mean background luminance

LuminanceDiff

Luminance

Sum of absolute luminance histogram bins [16]

Contrast Difference

Luminance

Absolute difference of contrast between prey and background, where contrast is the standard deviation in luminance levels