Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Procrustes ANOVA evaluating symmetric and asymmetric variation among the LLS terminal lobules of Micrasterias compereana

From: Asymmetry and integration of cellular morphology in Micrasterias compereana

Source Df SS MS R2 F Z p-value Fig
Individual 67 5.20 0.078 0.238 2.36 1.78 0.001 2a
Left-right asymmetry (ind) 68 1.19 0.018 0.055 0.49 0.46 1.000 2b
Inter-semicell asymmetry (ind) 68 4.62 0.068 0.212 2.52 1.81 0.001 2c
Transversal asymmetry (ind) 68 1.36 0.019 0.062 0.57 0.52 1.000 2d
Intra-lobe asymmetry (ind) 68 3.94 0.058 0.180 2.02 1.53 0.001 2e
Intra-lobe and Left-right (ind) 68 1.04 0.015 0.048 0.43 0.40 1.000 2f
Intra-lobe and Inter-semicell (ind) 68 2.38 0.035 0.109 1.08 0.92 0.799 2g
Intra-lobe and Transversal (ind) 68 1.10 0.016 0.050 0.45 0.42 1.000 2h
[Total asymmetry nested within individuals] 476 15.64 0.032 0.716     
Measurement error 544 0.99 0.002 0.046     
Total 1087 21.83       
  1. Df degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares, MS mean squares, R 2 percentage of variance explained by the effect, F pseudo-F ratio, Z effect size, p-value percentile of the effect size in the random distribution of F values, Fig figure illustrating particular (a) symmetric patterns