Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Statistics describing the relationships shown in Fig. 1. Models were fitted using both OLS and PGLS regressions

From: Evolutionary transitions in body plan and reproductive mode alter maintenance metabolism in squamates

Model N Slope (±SE) r 2 λ (95%CI) AIC ln likelihood F 1, 194 P-value
tSMR vs body mass
 OLS 196 0.85 (0.02)** 0.91   316.2 −153.5 1407.97 <  0.001
  196 0.76 (0.02)** 0.88 0 314.6 −151.3 1408.00 <  0.001
 PGLS 196 0.85 (0.03)** 0.86 0.61 (0.51/0.91) 308.8 −148.4a 1113.50 <  0.001
  196 0.87 (0.03)** 0.79 1 312.9 −150.5 716.21 <  0.001
mSMR vs temperature
 OLS 196 −0.42 (0.08)** 0.41   311.8 −150.9 21.97 <  0.001
  196 −0.47 (0.08)** 0.24 0 309.8 −148.9 61.57 <  0.001
 PGLS 196 −0.45 (0.09)** 0.16 0.51 (0.39/0.87) 293.8 −140.9a 23.09 <  0.001
  196 −0.38 (0.10)** 0.17 1 312.7 −150.4 14.97 <  0.001
  1. CI confidence interval
  2. a the PGLS model is significantly better than the OLS model (likelihood ratio test)
  3. ** P <  0.0001