Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Results of the phylogenetic path analyses, ranking the candidate models according to their CICc values. The models with ΔCICc < 2 are in bold

From: Evolutionary transitions in body plan and reproductive mode alter maintenance metabolism in squamates

Model k q C P CICc ΔCICc wi
five 4 11 2.983 0.935 26.417 0.000 0.225
eight 3 12 1.327 0.970 27.030 0.614 0.165
four 5 10 6.075 0.809 27.264 0.846 0.147
two 6 9 9.355 0.809 27.264 1.906 0.087
seven 3 12 2.765 0.672 28.323 2.052 0.081
nine 3 12 2.810 0.832 28.515 2.098 0.079
three 5 10 7.391 0.688 28.580 2.162 0.076
one 6 9 8.676 0.730 28.644 2.227 0.074
six 4 11 4.402 0.819 28.837 2.419 0.067
  1. k number of independence claims, q number of parameters, C Fisher’s C statistics, CICc C-statistic Information Criterion, ΔCICc difference in CICc from the best-fitting model, wi CICc weights