Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the phylogenetic path analyses, ranking the candidate models according to their CICc values. The models with ΔCICc < 2 are in bold

From: Evolutionary transitions in body plan and reproductive mode alter maintenance metabolism in squamates

Model

k

q

C

P

CICc

ΔCICc

wi

five

4

11

2.983

0.935

26.417

0.000

0.225

eight

3

12

1.327

0.970

27.030

0.614

0.165

four

5

10

6.075

0.809

27.264

0.846

0.147

two

6

9

9.355

0.809

27.264

1.906

0.087

seven

3

12

2.765

0.672

28.323

2.052

0.081

nine

3

12

2.810

0.832

28.515

2.098

0.079

three

5

10

7.391

0.688

28.580

2.162

0.076

one

6

9

8.676

0.730

28.644

2.227

0.074

six

4

11

4.402

0.819

28.837

2.419

0.067

  1. k number of independence claims, q number of parameters, C Fisher’s C statistics, CICc C-statistic Information Criterion, ΔCICc difference in CICc from the best-fitting model, wi CICc weights