Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Biogeography of Coptis Salisb. (Ranunculales, Ranunculaceae, Coptidoideae), an Eastern Asian and North American genus

BMC Evolutionary Biology201818:74

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1195-0

  • Received: 14 September 2017
  • Accepted: 17 May 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies have favored dispersal (colonization) over vicariance (past fragmentation) events to explain eastern Asian-North American distribution patterns. In plants, however the disjunction between eastern Asia and western North America has been rarely examined using the integration of phylogenetic, molecular dating, and biogeographical methods. Meanwhile, the biogeographic patterns within eastern Asia remain poorly understood. The goldthread genus Coptis Salisb. includes 15 species disjunctly distributed in North America, Japan, mainland China, and Taiwan. We present a dated phylogeny for Coptis under the optimal clock model and infer its historical biogeography by comparing different biogeographic models.

Results

The split of Coptis and Xanthorhiza Marshall occurred in the middle Miocene (ca. 15.47 Ma). Coptis started their diversification in the early late Miocene (ca. 9.55 Ma). A late Miocene vicariance event resulted in the eastern Asian and western North American disjunction in the genus. Within eastern Asia, dispersals from mainland Asia to Japan and from Japan to Taiwan occurred at ca. 4.85 Ma and at ca. 1.34 Ma, respectively.

Conclusions

Our analyses provide evidence that both vicariance and dispersal events have played important roles in shaping the current distribution and endemism of Coptis, likely resulting from eustatic sea-level changes, mountain formation processes and an increasing drier and cooler climate from the middle Miocene onwards.

Keywords

  • Ancestral range evolution
  • Climate change
  • Coptis
  • Eastern Asian
  • Taiwan
  • Western North America

Background

Understanding the geographical deployment of biodiversity through time is a central theme in historical biogeography [1]. The disjunct distributions of closely related organisms between East Asia and North America have fascinated botanists and biogeographers for over a century and a half [25]. In plants, biogeographic studies employing the integration of phylogenetic hypotheses, inference of ancestral ranges, and estimates of divergence times have largely focused on the classic eastern Asian and eastern North American floristic disjunction pattern [58]. Few studies have been devoted to investigate the eastern Asian and western North American disjunction [9, 10]. For these two patterns, the Miocene has been regarded as an important period, in which the Bering land bridge likely acted as a major gateway [5, 1113].

In the Northern Hemisphere, East Asia is a pivotal biogeographic region as it presents high levels of plant species diversity and endemism [14, 15]. Based on Takhtajan’s [16] floristic system, southern East Asia belongs to the Paleotropical Kingdom, whereas northern East Asia is part of the Holarctic Kingdom (Fig. 1). Recent molecular phylogenetic studies also indicate that the Tertiary relict floras within East Asia could be subdivided into two distinct southern and northern regions [17, 18]. The former consists of southern and southeastern China with extending to the Himalayas, while the latter contains Japan, Korea, and northeastern China. Besides, as a continental island adjacent to southeastern mainland China, the Ryukyus Islands, and Philippines, the floristic source of Taiwan is not clear [1921]. To date, biogeographic relationships among southern East Asia, northern East Asia and Taiwan are far from understood.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Geographic range of Coptis species. Doted lines in bold demarcate boundaries of the Holarctic and Paleotropical kingdoms according to Takhtajan [16]

The goldthread genus Coptis Salisb. (Ranunculales, Ranunculaceae, Coptidoideae) is of pharmaceutical and economical importance and is mainly distributed in the warm temperate to the cold coniferous forests of eastern Asia and North America [22, 23]. Among the 15 species recognized by Tamura [22], C. trifolia (L.) Salisb. has the widest distribution area (including Japan, the Kurile Islands, Kamchatka, and North America), while the other 14 species are restricted to smaller regions: five species are found in southern and southwestern mainland China with extensions to the Himalayas, five in Japan, one in Taiwan, and three in western North America (Fig. 1). Our recent phylogenetic analysis based on three DNA markers indicates that three western North American species of the genus clustered with five mainland Chinese and two Japanese species, and Taiwanese C. morii Hayata and three Japanese species grouped together [23]. The fruits of Coptis are dehiscent follicles [22] and seeds may be autochorously dispersed owing to lacking obvious adaptation to wind-dispersal. Seeds are not thereby expected to disperse over long distance or oceanic barriers. Thus, Coptis provides a remarkable opportunity for studying the eastern Asian and western North American distribution pattern, as well as the biogeographic relationships within East Asia.

In this study, first we reconstruct a dated phylogeny for Coptis based on six DNA markers, using a Bayesian relaxed clock method. Using the resulting dated-phylogenetic framework, we then infer the ancestral range evolution of Coptis by comparing the relative fit of six biogeographic models. Our study contributes to the knowledge on the eastern Asian-western North American distribution pattern and eastern Asian biogeography.

Methods

Samples and sequences

We sampled all 15 species of Coptis recognized by Tamura [22]. Coptis and the monotypic Xanthorhiza Marshall compose the subfamily Coptidoideae, which is sister to a large clade containing the overwhelming majority of genera of Ranunculaceae [24, 25]. Scoring this large clade for geographic areas is a challenge. Here, we only selected Xanthorhiza as the outgroup. The sampled species and their GenBank accession numbers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Six DNA markers, including five plastid (rbcL, trnL intron, trnL-F spacers, trnD-trnT, and trnH-psbA) and one nuclear (ITS) regions were used in this study. We generated new trnL sequence for C. japonica var. anemonifolia (Siebold & Zucc.) H. Ohba and trnL and ITS for C. morii. These two samples were collected in public land and no specific permits were required. Other sequences were obtained from GenBank. Laboratory procedures and sequence handling followed Wang and Chen [26]. Three difficult-to-align regions in trnL-F (encompassing 20 positions), two difficult-to-align regions in trnH-psbA (48 positions), and one difficult-to-align region in trnD-trnT (24 positions) were excluded from the analyses. The final dataset included 4288 characters: rbcL, 1304 bp; trnL intron, 465 bp; trnL-F, 426 bp; trnD-trnT, 1122 bp; trnH-psbA, 289 bp; and ITS, 682 bp.

Phylogeny and divergence time estimates

We first conducted a likelihood ratio test [27] to determine whether our sequence data were evolving in a clock-like fashion. Because rate constancy along all branches of the phylogeny was rejected (δ = 146.63, d.f. = 14, P < 0.0001), we used a Bayesian relaxed clock methodology as implemented in BEAST v1.8.2 [28] to generate a dated phylogeny for Coptis. Based on our recent broader study of Ranunculaceae [25], the split time between Coptis and Xanthorhiza was estimated at ca. 16.23 Ma (95% highest posterior density (HPD): 8.51–25.96) and was here used as a secondary calibration point. Following the suggestion of Ho [29], we assigned a prior normal distribution for the calibration, in which a standard deviation of 2 was set.

Following the result of Baele et al. [30], we used Bayes factors [31] calculated by marginal likelihoods derived from path sampling (PS) [32] and stepping-stone sampling (SS) [33] to compare the parametric fit of three clock models: exponential, lognormal and random. Since our sampling included all recognized species of Coptis and Xanthorhiza, a birth-death tree prior was used.

For all BEAST analyses, data partitioning and nucleotide substitution models were determined using PartitionFinder 2.1.1 [34, 35]. The Markov chain Monte Carlo chains were run for 100 million generations, sampling every 10,000 generations. Tracer v1.6 [36] was used to assess appropriate burn-in and the adequate effective sample size values (> 200). A burn-in of 25% was applied, and the maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree with the mean ages and 95% HPD intervals on nodes were conducted in TreeAnnotator v1.8.2 (part of the BEAST package) and edited in FigTree v.1.4.2 (http://beast.bio. ed.ac.uk/FigTree).

Ancestral range analysis

Based on the floristic characteristics [16, 18] and distributions of Coptis and Xanthorhiza [22], we coded five biogeographical areas (Fig. 1): (A) western North America, (B) southern East Asia (including southern and southeastern mainland China and the adjacent Himalayan region), (C) Japan and adjacent islands (including the Kurile Islands and Kamchatka), (D) Taiwan, and (E) eastern North America. The maximum range size was set to three, as no extant species occurs in more than three biogeographical regions. Because the Bering land bridge was periodically available for exchanges of plants between eastern Asia and western North America until 3.5 Ma [3739], dispersal probabilities between pairs of areas were specified for two separate time slices (Additional file 1: Table S2).

We used the R package BioGeoBEARS [40] for ancestral range estimation (ARE) on the MCC tree from the BEAST run under the optimal clock model and tree speciation prior. Recently, Ree & Sanmartín [41] demonstrated that the likelihood-based models with the +J parameter are invalid because of errors in the estimation of likelihoods. Here we compared the following three models of biogeographical estimation in the maximum likelihood (ML) framework: dispersal-extinction cladogenesis (DEC) model [42], dispersal–vicariance analysis (DIVA) [43] and BayArea model [44]. The fit for the different models was assessed using the Akaike information criterion scores.

Results

Phylogeny and divergence times

We identified the random clock model as optimal for our data (Table 1). The dated phylogenetic tree generated in the BEAST analysis under the random clock model and birth-death tree prior is indicated in Fig. 2. The relationships among Coptis species are well resolved with strong support (PP > 0.95) except for the node defining the sister relationship of C. quinquefolia Miq. and C. morii. Coptis contains two main clades (I and II). Based on our time estimates (Fig. 2), the stem and crown ages of Coptis are estimated at ca. 15.47 Ma (95% HPD: 11.47–19.37; node 1) and 9.55 Ma (95% HPD: 6.66–12.92; node 2), respectively. Within clade I, three western North American species clustered together and split from their eastern Asian sister group at ca. 7.78 Ma (95% HPD: 5.16–10.52; node 3). Japanese C. japonica Makino and C. lutescens Tamura are nested in the group of mainland Chinese species and the split of these two Japanese species and their sister group occurred at ca. 4.85 Ma (95% HPD: 2.98–6.80; node 4). Within clade II, Taiwanese C. morii and Japanese C. quinquefolia were grouped together with weak support (PP = 0.73). The split time of C. morii and C. quinquefolia was estimated to be at ca. 1.34 Ma (95% HPD: 0.69–2.18; node 5).
Table 1

Comparison of three clock models in BEAST analyses via Bayes factors

Clock model

Marginal likelihood

Exponential

Lognormal

Random

PS implementation

 Exponential

− 8809.70

37.44

−32.90

 Lognormal

− 8828.42

−37.44

−70.34

 Random

− 8793.25

32.90

70.34

 

SS implementation

 Exponential

− 8810.29

37.62

−33.72

 Lognormal

− 8829.10

−37.62

−71.34

 Random

−8793.43

33.72

71.34

2ln Bayes factor (BF) was calculated by marginal likelihoods derived from path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone sampling (SS) implementations in BEAST. 2ln BF > 2.0 represents positive evidence, > 6.00 represents strong evidence, and > 10.00 represents very strong evidence [31]

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Dated phylogeny of Coptis inferred from the combined plastid and nuclear data using BEAST under the random clock model and birth-death tree prior. Gray bars represent 95% highest posterior density intervals. Nodes of interests were marked as 1–5 in bold. All nodes are strongly supported (PP > 0.95) except for one node (in dashed line). Plio., Pliocene; Plt., Pleistocene

Ancestral range estimation

A DIVALIKE was found to be the best-fitting model (Table 2). The ARE for Coptis using BioGeoBEARS is indicated in Fig. 3 and Additional file 2: Figure S1. Area probabilities of all nodes are high except the root. Our ARE shows that the ancestral range of Coptis and Xanthorhiza is unresolved but likely involved eastern North America, western North America and Japan (node 1). The most recent common ancestor of Coptis was likely distributed in western North America, southern East Asia and Japan (node 2). Within Coptis, two vicariance events and two dispersal events were inferred at the species level (Fig. 3).
Table 2

Comparison of the fit of three models of biogeographical range evolution and model-specific estimates for the different parameters

Model

LnL

Parameter nb

d

e

AIC

ΔAIC

AICC

ΔAICC

DEC

−24.06

2

0.03

1.00 × 10− 12

52.12

3.59

53.04

3.58

DIVALIKE

−22.27

2

0.03

1.00 × 10− 12

48.53

0

49.46

0

BAYAREALIKE

−28.77

2

0.04

1.04 × 10−1

61.55

13.02

52.47

13.01

d = dispersal rate; e = extinction rate

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Ancestral range estimation (ARE) for Copits BEAST using BioGeoBEARS under the DIVALIKE model. Labeled nodes (1 to 5, as referred to Fig. 2), with 95% highest posterior densities (grey bars), are discussed in the text. The estimated ancestral ranges with the highest ML probability are shown by boxes on each node. Additional file 2: Figure S1 provides all ARE per node with pies. A pie is placed in this figure at the root with the highest probability less than 50%. The depictions of temperature (in red) and sea level (in black) changes are modified from Zachos et al. [45] and Haq et al. [57], respectively. Plio., Pliocene; Plt., Pleistocene

Discussion

The phylogenetic relationships in Coptis are highly consistent with the results of Xiang et al. [23], but are usually resolved with greater support for clades found therein. Our results do not support Taiwanese C. morii as sister to three Japanese species (C. ramose (Makino) Tamura, C. quinquefolia and C. trifoliolata (Makino) Makino), and instead suggest that C. morii is sister to C. quinquefolia, although with moderate support (PP = 0.71). Using the split age of ca. 16.23 Ma (95% HPD: 8.51–25.96) between Coptis and Xanthorhiza [25], we obtained a similar age estimate for the split (ca. 15.47 Ma; 95% HPD: 11.47–19.37; Fig. 2).

BioGeoBEARS analyses indicate that the crown of Coptis and Xanthorhiza most likely occurred in a widespread area comprising North America and Japan (Fig. 3; node 1), although other somewhat less likely ARE are possible (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The estimated age for the split of these two genera highly coincides with the mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO; ~ 15–17 Ma; Fig. 3) [45]. During this period, exchange of temperate plants between East Asia and North America could occur via the Bering land bridge [46]. Paleobotanical data indicate that the mixed mesophytic forest of the early and middle Miocene was continuous from Japan through Alaska and into conterminous North America [47, 48].

The American west encompassing the Colorado Plateau, Basin and Range, the High Plains, and the Rocky and Sierra Mountains began to uplift rapidly by 20–15 Ma [49]. A middle Miocene flora from Carson Pass in the central Sierra Nevada suggests uplift of about 2300 m since that time [50]. The uplift is a key factor in creating an increasingly drier climate in the North American interior around that time [49, 51]. Paleobotanical evidence suggests that by the middle Miocene the arid interior has become an effective barrier to biotic interchange between eastern and western North America [52, 53]. After the MMCO, an increasingly drier climate, as well as global cooling (Fig. 3) [45], might thus have resulted in a vicariance event responsible for the divergence of Coptis and Xanthorhiza (node 1; Fig. 3).

After Coptis diverged from Xanthorhiza, a subsequent dispersal from Japan to southern East Asia occurred in the early late Miocene (9.55 Ma, 95% HPD: 6.66–12.92; node 2). This time is markedly later than the time of the opening of the Japan Sea (23–15 Ma), which separated the Japanese Islands from the Northeast Asian margins [5456]. However, during the early late Miocene, a marked drop of sea level occurred (Fig. 3) [57], which might have resulted in East China Sea seafloor exposure between the Eurasian mainland and the Japanese Archipelago. Hence, Coptis could have migrated westward into continental Asia via this land bridge. Subsequent sea-level rise might have resulted in the interruption of population exchange of the genus between the Asian mainland and the Japanese Islands. Accordingly, Coptis diverged into two clades (I and II).

In clade I, one vicariance episode happened between western North America and southern East Asia in the Late Miocene (ca. 7.78 Ma, 95% HPD: 5.16–10.52; node 3), which overlapped closely with the time of the first opening of the Bering Strait (7.4–5.5 Ma) [58]. Evidence from sedimentology and foraminifera indicates that uplift of the St. Elias Mts. in Alaska began about 8.5 Ma [59]. Palynological analyses suggest that the trends of temperature decline and increasing canopy openness in Alaska and Yukon Territory occurred between 9.7 and 7.0 Ma, owing to global and local tectonic developments [60]. These events may explain the distribution of Coptis between southern East Asia and western North America during the Late Miocene. The split of western North American Polypodium californicum Kaulf. (Polypodiaceae) and its eastern Asian relatives (P. fauriei (Copel.) Makino & Nemoto and P. glycyrrhiza D.C. Eaton) also occurred during the same period (ca. 8.81 Ma, 95% HPD: 5.06-13.08) [61]. Such distribution patterns resulting from orogenic events have been found in some plant lineages and in different biomes, such as Campanulaceae [62], Orchidaceae [63], and Rubiaceae [64].

One dispersal event in clade I occurred in the early Pliocene from southern East Asia to Japan (ca. 4.85 Ma, 95% HPD: 2.98–6.80; node 4). The most recent common ancestor of Japanese Pseudotsuga japonica (Shiras) Beissn. and mainland Chinese P. gaussenii Flous and P. sinensis Dode (Pinaceae) was estimated to occur at ca. 4.64 ± 1.93 Ma [65]. In Eupteleaceae, Chinese Euptelea pleiosperma Hook. f. & Thomson split with Japanese E. polyandra Siebold & Zucc. at ca. 6.04 Ma (95% HPD: 2.89–9.36) [66]. The drop of sea level may have resulted in exchanges of plants between mainland Asia and the Japanese Islands via the East China Sea land bridge, and subsequent rise of sea level and global cooling (Fig. 2) [67], as well as an increasingly drier climate in Asia [68], may have caused the interruption of the continuous distribution of ancestral populations of some extant species during the Late Miocene to the Early Pliocene.

Within clade II, one dispersal event from Japan to Taiwan occurred in the Early Pleistocene (ca. 1.34 Ma; 95% HPD: 0.69–2.18; node 5). The eustatic sea-level fluctuation during this period, as well as global cooling (Fig. 2), may have triggered Coptis range expansion from Japan to Taiwan via the Ryukyu Islands, and may have subsequently caused range fragmentation. A similar scenario also explains the current distribution of Taiwanese Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum. and C. taiwanensis Masam. & Suzuki (Cupressaceae) from hypothetical Japanese ancestors [69]. Our analysis on Dichocarpum W.T. Wang & P.G. Xiao indicates that Taiwanese D. arisanense (Hayata) W.T. Wang & P.G. Xiao could have originated from mainland China in the Early Pleistocene (ca. 1.26 Ma, 95% HPD: 0.48–2.33) [70]. These studies support the hypothesis that temperate elements of the flora of Taiwan recently migrated from mainland China and Japan [71].

Conclusions

We present a dated phylogeny for all species of Coptis, a genus of pharmaceutical and economical importance. Our biogeographical inference indicates that a vicariance event between Japan-western North America and eastern North America occurred in the Middle Miocene, resulting in the split of Coptis and Xanthorhiza. The most recent common ancestor of Coptis occurred in western North America, southern East Asia and Japan. In Coptis, two vicariance episodes, involving Japan and western North America-southern East Asian and western North America and southern East Asian, took place at ca. 9.55 Ma and 7.78 Ma, respectively. Two dispersal events happened from mainland Asia to Japan at ca. 4.85 Ma and from Japan to Taiwan at ca. 1.34 Ma, respectively. This study shed light on the past floristic exchanges between East Asia and North America, as well as within East Asia.

Abbreviations

ARE: 

Ancestral range estimation

BF: 

Bayes factor

DEC: 

Dispersal-extinction cladogenesis

DIVA: 

Dispersal–vicariance analysis

HPD: 

Highest posterior density

MCC: 

Maximum clade credibility

ML: 

Maximum likelihood

MMCO: 

Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum

PS: 

Path sampling

SS: 

Stepping-stone sampling

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Sheng-Xiang Yu for technique assistance and G.H. Harper for carefully reading an early draft of the manuscript. We also thank Gael J. Kergoat and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions that greatly improved our manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB0203), the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB954100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770231, 31270269 and 31470315), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association Foundation of CAS, and the D.I. Mendeleev Scientific Fund Program of Tomsk State University. The funding body had no role in the design, collection and conclusion of this study.

Availability of data and materials

The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. MG991242–MG991244). The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

WW designed and managed the project. KLX, ASE, FJ and WW collected the data. KLX, XGX and WW analysed the data. KLX and WW led the writing with contributions from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China
(2)
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
(3)
Central Siberian Botanical Garden of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Zolotodolinskaya str. 101, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
(4)
Laboratory of Systematics and Phylogeny of Plants, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
(5)
Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, 75005 Paris, France

References

  1. Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Whittaker RJ, Brown JH. Biogeography. 4th ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Sanmartín I, Enghoff H, Ronquist F. Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biol J Linn Soc. 2001;73:345–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gray A. Diagnostic characters of phanerogamous plants collected in Japan by Charles Wright, botanist of the U.S. North Pacific exploring expedition, with observations upon the relations of the Japanese flora to that of North America, and other parts of the northern temperate zone. Mem Am Acad Arts Sci NS. 1859;6:377–453.Google Scholar
  4. Li HL. Floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Trans Am Phil Soc. 1952;42:371–429.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wen J, Ickert-Bond SM, Nie ZL, Li R. Timing and modes of evolution of eastern Asian–north American biogeographic disjunctions in seed plants. In: Long M, Gu H, Zhou Z, editors. Darwin’s heritage today: proceedings of the Darwin 200 Beijing international conference. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2010. p. 252–69.Google Scholar
  6. Donoghue MJ, Bell CD, Li JH. Phylogenetic patterns in northern hemisphere plant geography. Int J Plant Sci. 2001;162(Suppl 6):S41–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Donoghue MJ, Smith SA. Patterns in the assembly of the temperate forest around the northern hemisphere. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 2004;359:1633–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng T, Nie ZL, Drew BT, Volis S, Kim C, Xiang CL, Zhang JW, Wang YH, Sun H. Does the Arcto-tertiary biogeographic hypothesis explain the disjunct distribution of northern hemisphere herbaceous plants? The case of Meehania (Lamiaceae). PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117171.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhou Z, Wen J, Li GD, Sun H. Phylogenetic assessment and biogeographic analyses of tribe Peracarpeae (Campanulaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2012;298:323–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wen J, Nie ZL, Ickert-Bond SM. Intercontinental disjunctions between eastern Asia and western North America in vascular plants highlight the biogeographic importance of the Bering land bridge from late cretaceous to Neogene. J Syst Evol. 2016;54:469–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang W, Chen ZD, Liu Y, Li RQ, Li JH. Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversification of Berberidaceae in the northern hemisphere. Syst Bot. 2007;32:731–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wen J. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern north American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1999;30:421–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang XQ, Ran JH. Evolution and biogeography of gymnosperms. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;75:24–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu ZY, Wu SG. A proposal for a new floristic kingdom (realm) — the E. Asiatic kingdom, its delimitation and characteristics. In: Zhang AL, Wu SG, editors. Floristic characteristics and diversity of east Asian plants. Beijing: China Higher Education Press and Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996. p. 3–42.Google Scholar
  15. Manchester SR, Chen ZD, Lu AM, Uemura K. Eastern Asian endemic seed plant genera and their paleogeographic history throughout the northern hemisphere. J Syst Evol. 2009;47:1–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Takhtajan A. Floristic regions of the world. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  17. Milne RI, Abbott RJ. The origin and evolution of tertiary relict floras. Adv Bot Res. 2002;38:281–314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Milne RI. Northern hemisphere plant disjunctions: a window on tertiary land bridges and climate change? Ann Bot. 2006;98:465–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang BZ, Zhuo ZD. Basic features of seed plant flora in Taiwan area. Trop Geogr. 1995;15:263–71.Google Scholar
  20. Ying TS, Hsu KS. An analysis of the flora of seed plants of Taiwan, China: its nature, characteristics, and relations with the flora of the mainland. Acta Phytotax Sin. 2002;40:1–51.Google Scholar
  21. Hsieh CF. Composition, endemism and phytogeographical affinities of the Taiwan flora. Taiwania. 2002;47:298–310.Google Scholar
  22. Tamura M. Coptis. In: Hiepko P, editor. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 17a IV. 2nd ed. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot; 1995. p. 444–9.Google Scholar
  23. Xiang KL, Wu SD, Yu SX, Liu Y, Jabbour F, Erst AS, Zhao L, Wei W, Chen ZD. The first comprehensive phylogeny of Coptis (Ranunculaceae) and its implications for character evolution and classification. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153127.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang W, Lu AM, Ren Y, Endress ME, Chen ZD. Phylogeny and classification of Ranunculales: evidence from four molecular loci and morphological data. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;11:81–110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang W, Lin L, Xiang XG, Ortiz RC, Liu Y, Xiang KL, Yu SX, Xing YW, Chen ZD. The rise of angiosperm-dominated herbaceous floras: insights from Ranunculaceae. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27259.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang W, Chen ZD. Generic level phylogeny of Thalictroideae (Ranunculaceae) — implications for the taxonomic status of Paropyrum and petal evolution. Taxon. 2007;56:811–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969–73.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho SYW. Calibrating molecular estimates of substitution rates and divergence times in birds. J Avian Biol. 2007;38:409–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Baele G, Li WLS, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Lemey P. Accurate model selection of relaxed molecular clocks in Bayesian phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:239–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J Amer Stat Assoc. 1995;90:773–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lartillot N, Philippe H. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst Biol. 2006;55:195–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Xie W, Lewis PO, Fan Y, Kuo L, Chen MH. Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Syst Biol. 2011;60:150–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1695–701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;34:772–3.Google Scholar
  36. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ. Tracer, version 1.6. 2014. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer/. Accessed 9 July 2017.
  37. Allen RT. Distribution patterns among arthropods of the north temperate deciduous forest biota. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1983;70:616–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Tiffney BH. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. J Arn Arb. 1985;66:73–94.Google Scholar
  39. Cunningham CW, Collins TM. Developing model systems for molecular biogeography: vicariance and interchange in marine invertebrates. In: Schierwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, DeSalle R, editors. Molecular ecology and evolution, approaches and application. Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlad Base; 1994. p. 405–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Matzke NJ. Probabilistic historical biogeography: new models for founder-event speciation, imperfect detection, and fossils allow improved accuracy and model-testing. Front Biogeogr. 2013;5:242–8.Google Scholar
  41. Ree RH, Sanmartín I. Conceptual and statistical problems with the DEC+J model of founder-event speciation and its comparison with DEC via model selection. J Biogeogr. 2018;45:741–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ree RH, Moore BR, Webb CO, Donoghue MJ. A likelihood framework for inferring the evolution of geographic range on phylogenetic trees. Evolution. 2005;59:2299–311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ronquist F. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: a new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Syst Biol. 1997;6:195–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Landis MJ, Matzke NJ, Moore BR, Huelsenbeck JP. Bayesian analysis of biogeography when the number of areas is large. Syst Biol. 2013;62:789–804.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 ma to present. Science. 2001;292:686–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Tiffney BH, Manchester SR. The use of geological and paleontological evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the north hemisphere tertiary. J Plant Sci. 2001;162(Suppl 6):S3–S17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolfe JA, Leopold EB. Neogene and early quaternary vegetation of northwestern North America and northeastern Asia. In: Hopkins DM, editor. The Bering band bridge. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1967. p. 193–206.Google Scholar
  48. Wolfe JA. An interpretation of Alaskan tertiary floras. In: Graham A, editor. Floristics and paleofloristics of Asia and eastern North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1972. p. 201–33.Google Scholar
  49. Ruddiman WF, Kutzbach JE. Late Cenozoic plateau uplift and climate change. Trans R Soc Edinb Earth Sci. 1990;81:301–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Axelrod DI. Analysis of some palaeogeographic and palaeoecologic problems of palaeobotany. Palaeobotanist. 1986;35:115–29.Google Scholar
  51. Manabe S, Broccoli AJ. Mountains and arid climates of middle latitudes. Science. 1990;247:192–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Leopold EB, Denton MF. Comparative age of grassland and steppe east and west of the northern Rocky Mountains. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1987;74:841–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Graham A. Late cretaceous and Cenozoic history of north American vegetation: north of Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  54. Otofuji Y, Matsuda T, Nohda S. Opening mode of the Japan Sea inferred from the palaeomagnetism of the Japan arc. Nature. 1985;317:603–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Otofuji Y, Itaya T, Matsuda T. Rapid rotation of Southwest Japan—paleomagnetism and K-Ar ages of Miocene volcanic-rocks of Southwest Japan. Geophys J Int. 1991;105:397–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Baba AK, Matsuda T, Itaya T, Wada Y, Hori N, Yokoyama M, Eto N, Kamei R, Zaman H, Kidane T, Otofuji Y. New age constraints on counter-clockwise rotation of NE Japan. Geophys J Int. 2007;171:1325–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Haq BU, Hardenbol J, Vail PR. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science. 1987;235:1156–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Marincovich Jr L, Gladenkov AY. Evidence for an early opening of the Bering Strait. Nature. 1999;397:149–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Lagoe MB, Eyles CH, Eyles N, Hale C. Timing of late Cenozoic tidewater glaciation in the far North Pacific. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1993;10:1542–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. White JM, Ager TA, Adam DP, Leopold EB, Liu G, Jetté H, Schweger CE. An 18 million year record of vegetation and climate change in northwestern Canada and Alaska: tectonic and global climatic correlates. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1997;130:293–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Sigel EM, Windham MD, Haufler CH, Pryer KM. Phylogeny, divergence time estimates, and phylogeography of the diploid species of the Polypodium vulgare complex (Polypodiaceae). Syst Bot. 2014;39:1042–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Lagomarsino LP, Condamine FL, Antonelli A, Mulch A, Davis CC. The abiotic and biotic drivers of rapid diversification in Andean bellflowers (Campanulaceae). New Phytol. 2016;210:1430–2.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Pérez-Escobar OA, Chomicki G, Condamine FL, Karremans AP, Bogarín D, Matzke NJ, Silvestro D, Antonelli A. Recent origin and rapid speciation of Neotropical orchids in the world’s richest plant biodiversity hotspot. New Phytol. 2017;215:891–905.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Antonelli A, Nylander JAA, Persson C, Sanmartín I. Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on Neotropical plant evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9749–54.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Wei XX, Yang ZY, Li Y, Wang XQ. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Pseudotsuga (Pinaceae): insights into the floristic relationship between Taiwan and its adjacent areas. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;55:776–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Cao YN, Comes HP, Sakaguchi S, Chen LY, Qiu XY. Evolution of East Asia’s Arcto-tertiary relict Euptelea (Eupteleaceae) shaped by late Neogene vicariance and quaternary climate change. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:66.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Herbert TD, Lawrence KT, Tzanova A, Peterson LC, Caballero-Gill R, Kelly CS. Late Miocene global cooling and the rise of modern ecosystems. Nat Geosci. 2016;9:843–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Li CX, Lu SG, Ma JY, Gai YH, Yang Q. Phylogeographic history of the woodwardioid ferns, including species from Himalaya. Palaeoworld. 2014;25:7.Google Scholar
  69. Wang WP, Hwang CY, Lin TP, Hwang SY. Historical biogeography and phylogenetic relationships of the genus Chamaecyparis (Cupressaceae) inferred from chloroplast DNA polymorphism. Plant Syst Evol. 2003;241:13–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Xiang KL, Zhao L, Erst AS, Yu SX, Jabbour F, Wang W. A molecular phylogeny of Dichocarpum (Ranunculaceae): implications for eastern Asian biogeography. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017;107:594–604.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Huang SF. Historical biogeography of the flora of Taiwan. J Taiwan Mus. 2011;64:33–63.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement