Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Macrofossil evidence unveiling evolution of male cones in Ephedraceae (Gnetidae)

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 4
BMC Evolutionary Biology201818:125

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1243-9

  • Received: 28 March 2018
  • Accepted: 15 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Male cones of modern Ephedraceae are compound and compact. No fossil evidence has so far been found to support an origin of the compact compound male cone from a hypothetical loosely-arranged shoot system.

Results

Here we describe a new macrofossil taxon, Eamesia chinensis Yang, Lin, Ferguson et Wang, gen. et sp. nov., from the Early Cretaceous of western Liaoning, northeastern China. It was an ephedroid shrub bearing male spikes terminal to twigs, but differs from modern Ephedraceae by its loosely-arranged male cones, the axillary male shoot consisting of an elongated synangiophore on which leaf-like foliar organs were inserted, and four sessile synangia terminal to the apex.

Conclusions

The morphology of this fossil suggests that the modern compact male cone of Ephedra was indeed derived from a once loosely-arranged shoot system, and the male reproductive unit originated from a once elongated axillary male shoot. This new fossil species thus provides a transitional link from the hypothetical ancestral shoot system to the modern compact morphology. Changes of habitat from closed humid forests to open dry deserts and shifts of the pollination syndrome may have acted as the driving forces behind this morphological evolution.

Keywords

  • Early cretaceous
  • Ephedra
  • Evolution
  • Gnetophytes
  • Jehol biota
  • Male cone
  • Yixian formation

Background

The gnetophytes contain three extant monotypic families, i.e. Ephedraceae (Ephedra L.), Gnetaceae (Gnetum L.), and Welwitschiaceae (Welwitschia Hook. f.); these live in different habitats and possess divergent morphology [1]. The Ephedraceae are common in cold and dry places in both the Old- and the New Worlds, the Gnetaceae live in warm and humid tropical/subtropical forests of Asia, Africa, and South America, while the Welwitschiaceae only occur in warm and dry coastal places in southwestern Africa [1]. The Ephedraceae are shrubs, rarely small trees or lianas, the Gnetaceae are usually lianas, rarely small trees, while the Welwitschiaceae are represented by a single species, Welwitschia mirabilis, which is a dwarf shrub [1]. The Ephedraceae are basal within the living gnetophytes [2, 3], but possess extremely reduced morphology compared to the Gnetaceae and Welwitschiaceae, e.g. small linear leaves with simple parallel veins (vs. broad leaves with pinnate venation in the Gnetaceae, and giant leaves with multiple parallel veins having interconnected interveins in the Welwitschiaceae), reduced female cones with only the uppermost pair/whorl of bracts fertile (vs. multiple pairs/whorls of fertile bracts in the Gnetaceae and the Welwitschiaceae), usually unisexual male cones (vs. usually bisexual male cones having abortive enveloped seeds in the Gnetaceae and the Welwitschiaceae) [1]. These morphological characters of the three families are so different from each other that classifying them as a monophyletic group was sometimes questioned. Based on an evolutionary analysis of cone morphology, Eames [4] concluded that the Ephedrales are descendants of the Cordaitales, while the Gnetales and Welwitschiales are close to cycads. Meyen [5] laid emphasis on seed symmetry, and assigned the Ephedrales to the Ginkgoopsida, while placing the Gnetales and Welwitschiales in the Cycadopsida. Subsequent cladistic studies either suggested that the gnetophytes comprise a monophyletic group [6], or a paraphyletic group [7]. However, modern molecular phylogenetic studies strongly support them as belonging to a single clade [2, 3]. The partially enveloped seeds and the presence of foraminate vessels can unite the three families/orders into a monophyletic group [8]. It remains a riddle as to how these plants evolved from the common ancestor considering their huge morphological gaps.

A large number of macrofossils showing gnetalean morphology has been reported from the Mesozoic since the end of the last century, e.g. in Asia [926], in Australia [27], in Europe & North America [2832], and in South America [3338]. Some of them were described as angiosperms, e.g. Chaoyangia Duan≡Gurvanella Krassilov, Liaoxia Cao et Wu, Callianthus Wang et Zheng≡Erenia Krassilov, Baicarpus Han et al., and Pseudoephedra Liu et Wang, but actually belonged to the gnetophytes [21, 22, 39]. These macrofossils were mostly female [1517, 20, 2426], and rarely male (e.g. Khitania Guo et al. of the Gnetaceae [10]; Welwitschiostrobus Dilcher et al. of the Welwitschiaceae [34]), or bisexual (e.g. Callianthus dilae Wang et Zheng [38]) or monoecious (e.g. Friedsellowia Löwe et al. [35]). These macrofossils have greatly enhanced our understanding of the early evolution of the female cones of gnetalean plants, especially those ephedroid fossils from northeastern China [16, 17, 2026], and a reduction-sterilization model integrating morphological, anatomical, ontogenetic, and palaeobotanical evidence has been developed to explain the origin and evolution of the modern reduced and compact female cone of the Ephedraceae [2125]. However, thus far little evidence has been found to unveil the evolution of male cones in the gnetophytes.

Male reproductive organs of the gnetophytes are markedly diversified. Male cones of Ephedra are compound (Fig. 1), consisting of two to 13 whorls of binately or ternately arranged bracts, each bract excepting the lowermost pair subtends an axillary male reproductive unit which has a pair of dorso-ventrally fused bracteoles enclosing a middle synangiophore with 3–12 apical sessile to stipitate synangia [40, 41]. However, a few species sometimes bear aborted female reproductive units which are enclosed in the uppermost pair of bracts [2, 41, 42]. Occasionally bisexual reproductive units occur in a male cone [43]. Male spikes of Gnetum usually possess aborted female reproductive units above the male whorls [42, 44], while Welwitschia normally has male cones consisting of ‘bisexual’ reproductive units, each of which includes six basally fused synangiophores and a central aborted ovule with a long micropylar tube [1].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Morphology and structure of male cones of Ephedra intermedia. a, a male cone; b, a male reproductive unit

Though Eames [4] and Mundry & Stützel [45] both support a close relationship between the Ephedraceae and the Cordaitales, their explanations on evolution of the male cones of the Ephedraceae are fundamentally different. Eames [4] hypothesized that male cones of Ephedra are compound, early cones are comparable to those of Cordaianthus, the axillary male reproductive unit is a modified reproductive shoot (‘simple strobilus’), and the pair of fused bracteoles was derived from leaves, while the middle synangiophore represents a pair of fused microsporophylls. Mundry & Stützel [45] proposed a much more complicated model, in which the hypothetical ancestor of the gnetophytes was considered to be bisexual, its reproductive shoot system branched at least twice and is thus super-compound with an apical compound female cone and several pairs of lateral compound male cones. In this scenario, the modern synangiophore was derived from a male cone by reduction of foliar organs and shortening of the sporophyll-bearing secondary shoots, the modern synangiophore being formed by the fusion of two reproductive shoots, with each shoot having four terminal synangia. The modern axillary male reproductive unit is thus a compound cone. Despite their difference, both models suggest that the male cone of the Ephedraceae was derived from a loosely arranged shoot system, but no direct fossil evidence has been found to support this thus far.

There are a few fossil gnetalean male cones reported from the Early Cretaceous, but all of them are specialized and no structural details were preserved: Khitania is close to Gnetum [10], Welwitschiostrobus belongs to the Welwitschiaceae [34], while Friedsellowia possesses an ambiguous affinity to living families of Gnetidae [35]. Although important finds, these plant fossils are not helpful for testing the competing hypotheses on the evolution of male cones in the Ephedraceae.

The Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of northeastern China is well known for its excellent fossil preservations including dinosaurs, early birds, and the early angiosperm Archaefructaceae [18, 46, 47]. The Yixian Formation consists of fossiliferous lacustrine sediments, with a plant fossil assemblage which indicates that the palaeoenvironment was once warm and humid, with a subtropical flora dominated by conifers [48]. Frequent volcanic eruptions, together with forest fires and poisonous gases resulted in frequent destructions/reestablishment of the local vegetation, and thus affected the evolution and diversification of both plants and animals [46]. Here we report a new ephedroid macrofossil from the Early Cretaceous of northeastern China which is significant for understanding reproductive evolution in the Ephedraceae.

Results

Gymnosperms

Subclass – Gnetidae Pax.

Order – Ephedrales Dumortier.

Family – Ephedraceae Dumortier, emend [21].

SpeciesEamesia chinensis Y. Yang, L.B. Lin, D.K. Ferguson et Y.W. Wang, gen. et sp. nov. Figs. 2, 3 and 4.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Part and counterpart of Eamesia chinensis. a, part; b, counterpart. Abbreviations: c, male cone; l, leaves; n, node

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Morphology of Eamesia chinensis. a, nodal portion magnified showing the linear to lanceolate leaf shape; b and c, male cone magnified showing the scale-like bracts, the elongated synangiophore, the sessile synangia, and the linear foliar organ. Abbreviations: a, synangiophore; b, bract; f, foliar organ; l, leaf; n, node; s, synangia; v, vein

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Reconstruction of Eamesia chinensis. a, plant portion displaying the habit, the decussate phyllotaxy, and the terminal male cones; b, male cone magnified displaying the loosely organized male spikes, the acropetal developmental pattern, and the modified synangiophore having a pair of foliar organs below the terminal synangia. Abbreviations: a, synangiophore; b, bract; f, foliar organ; l, leaf; m, male spike; s, synangium

Diagnosis – The plant is ephedroid; shoot dichasially branched; nodes swollen; internodes longitudinally striated. Male cones terminal on twigs, laxly arranged; synangiophore elongated, and possesses four sessile synangia apically, below the synangia are a (pair of) free linear foliar organs.

Description – The preserved plant consists of part and counterpart (Fig. 2a & b). Plant ca. 9.1 cm tall, possessing swollen nodes and finely striated internodes, dichasially branched at nodes. Shoot ca. 4 mm thick at the base, tapering distally. Leaves opposite at nodes, ascending to spreading, linear to somewhat lanceolate, 7–9 mm long, 1–2 mm broad, at base slightly narrowed into a short petiole; leaf veins parallel (Fig. 3a). Male cones terminal on twigs, 4–10 mm long, possessing at least three pairs of bracts, developed acropetally, laxly arranged; the lowermost internode up to 6 mm long (Fig. 3b & c). Cone bracts linear and leaf-like, each subtending a synangiophore, 3–10 mm long; four sessile synangia distal to each synangiophore (Fig. 3c); a (pair of) linear foliar organ(s) present below the synangia (Fig. 3b). The synangia probably had apical pores.

Etymology – The generic name “Eamesia” is given in honour of the plant morphologist Arthur J. Eames, while the specific epithet “chinensis” is named for China where the type originates from.

Holotype – 2015092901A & B (Fig. 2a & b) (Part and counterpart specimens of a single collection, here designated).

Repository – Chinese National Herbarium (PE), Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Type locality – Dawangzhangzi Village, Songzhangzi Town, Lingyuan City, Chaoyang District, Liaoning Province, China (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Illustrations displaying evolution of the modern compact cones from ancestral male shoots through transitional lax male spikes. a, the hypothetical ancestral male shoot; b, the transitional lax male spikes of Eamesia chinensis; c, the modern compact male cone of modern Ephedraceae. Abbreviations: ax, axis of reproductive shoots/male cones; b, bracts/foliar organs on primary axis of male cones/spikes; br, bracteoles on the secondary axis of male cones/spikes; m, microsporophylls; s, synangium

Stratigraphic horizon and age – Early Cretaceous, Daxinfangzi Bed (previously known as Dawangzhangzi Bed), Yixian Formation (Early Aptian-earliest Late Aptian of the Early Cretaceous).

RemarksEamesia chinensis Yang, Lin, Ferguson et Wang is the first ephedroid plant from the Early Cretaceous displaying structural details of the male cones. The new plant differs from modern Ephedra in its laxly arranged male cones having an elongated axillary synangiophore (or male shoot) with linear foliar organs in the upper portion just below the sessile synangia (vs. compact male cones bearing an axillary sessile male unit consisting of a pair of bracteoles enclosing an inner synangiophore in Ephedra). The male cones developed in an acropetal manner, the proximal synangiophores were elongated, while the distal ones became shorter and were under-developed. Synangia of the lower pair of male shoots were well-developed, indicating that this plant was in the pollination phase. We did not recognize any female units in this plant, and believe that this is a unisexual male plant.

This plant was probably a shrub, because the stem was thick and seems woody proximally, becoming attenuated distally. There are linear white marks opposite at most nodes; being so regular, we believe these must represent leaf remains. We did not notice any such leaf remains in many other ephedroid macrofossils from the Yixian Formation. The leaf remains of Eamesia chinensis were probably tender and slightly fleshy. Based on our morphological study, we reconstructed the plant in a line drawing (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Comparisons with other known gnetophytes from the early cretaceous

Fossil gnetophytes have a high morphological diversity and wide distribution. Fossils of male plants related to the Gnetaceae are rare, only represented by Khitania from the Early Cretaceous of northeastern China [10]. The external morphology of Khitania is very close to that of modern Gnetum. It consists of a bifurcate reproductive shoot with two apical elongated male cones with many whorls of annular involucral bracts, but no structural details are preserved [10]. Eamesia chinensis Yang, Lin, Lin, Ferguson et Wang differs markedly from Khitania by its laxly arranged male cones with opposite and decussate reproductive units (vs. compact cones with annular bract collars).

The Welwitschiaceae were distributed in southwestern Europe, eastern North America, and northern South America in the Early Cretaceous [28, 30, 34]. Fossils from the Northern Hemisphere are either seed mesofossils (Becatia Friis et al.) [30] or female plants (Drewria Crane et Upchurch) [28]. Eamesia chinensis is similar to Drewria in its dichasial branching pattern and the opposite linear leaves, but differs in possessing smaller leaves (7–9 × 1–2 mm vs. 10–20 × 2–6 mm in Drewria). Welwitschiostrobus is a male cone from South America [34]. Eamesia chinensis is similar to Welwitschiostrobus in the opposite reproductive units, but differs from the latter in its laxly arranged cones (vs. compact cones). Löwe et al. [35] reported a monoecious plant from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of South America: Friedsellowia Löwe et al., which is close to Welwitschia. It differs from our new species in its giant and monoecious habit, and the tightly arranged male cones subtending a central female cone.

Many ephedroid macrofossils from the Early Cretaceous of northeastern China and Mongolia have been found, some of which are preserved with reproductive shoots [1326]. These macrofossils display similarities to our new species including a dichasial branching pattern, articulate branches having swollen nodes and longitudinally furrowed internodes, as well as opposite and decussate leaves (if present; leaves are not seen in Ephedra hongtaoi Wang et Zheng, and E. archaeorhytidosperma Yang et al.). Leaves of Eamesia chinensis are linear and simple, as in Gurvanella Krassilov (syn.: Chaoyangia Duan et al.) [49, 50], Liaoxia Cao et Wu [17], Prognetella Krassilov [22], Chengia Yang et al. [25], and Siphonospermum Rydin et Friis [16]. They differ from Spinobractea lanceolata Liu et al. and Constrobilus ovata Liu et al. by their smaller linear leaves 7–9 mm long (vs. larger ovate broad leaves 20–35 mm long [14]), from Latibractea divisa Liu et al. by the simple leaves (vs. larger divided leaves in the latter species [14]), and from Ephedra multinervia Yang et al. by the smaller linear leaves less than 1 cm (vs. larger strap-like leaves ca. 4.9 cm long [24]).

Eamesia chinensis also shows similarities to a few female macrofossil gnetalean species from South America in the dichasial branching pattern and opposite leaf arrangement, e.g. Itajuba yansanae Ricardi-Branco et al. [37], Cariria orbiculiconiformis Kunzmann et al. [51], Ephedra verticillata Cladera et al. [33].

Unfortunately, it is not possible to compare Eamesia chinensis with a few other ephedroid species preserved only as seed mesofossils [29, 32] or female cones, e.g. Pseudoephedra paradoxa [15], Ephedra carnosa Yang et Wang [26], and Protoephedrites Rothwell et Stockey [31]. Erenia (syn.: Callianthus Wang et Zheng) is a female cone [21, 52], although Wang and Zheng [39] thought it was a bisexual “flower” due to their mistaken interpretation of the fragmentary bracts as male structures.

In its vegetative morphology and paired axillary male reproductive units, Eamesia chinensis shows the closest similarity to Ephedra within the living gnetophytes. It differs from Gnetum by the cone lacking annular collars and leaf morphology (linear and parallel-veined vs. pinnately veined broad leaves in Gnetum), and from Welwitschia by the lack of bisexual reproductive units in male cones, the dwarf habit, and the giant leaves.

Shortening of synangiophore and evolution of bracteoles

Previous botanists suggested that the synangiophore is a compound structure derived from fusion of two microsporophylls because the synangiophore is sometimes bilobed in E. intermedia, E. distachya and E. nebrodensis (≡E. major) [1, 4, 53]. Such lobed synangiophores are not observed in Eamsia chinensis, in fact, the synangiophore of this fossil species is completely united and the four synangia are all sessile. As a result, our new species does not help in resolving this hypothesis. However, the new fossil species does provide evolutionary clues in other aspects.

Firstly, the male cone of the Ephedraceae was considered to be compound, implying that the axillary male unit was derived from a secondary shoot. There is no other evidence to support the shoot nature of the male unit except for its axillary position. In the fossil species, the male unit is elongated and displays shoot features, for instance, the male unit is axillary to a bract and possesses a long proximal stalk below the foliar organs that correspond to the bracteoles of modern species. This may confirm the male shoot hypothesis.

Secondly, male cones of modern Ephedraceae are compound and compact. Our macrofossil Eamsia chinensis possesses loosely arranged male spikes having both elongated syangiophores and internodes on the cone axis, thus possessing transitional morphology linking a hypothetical ancestral shoot system of male shoots to the modern compact compound male cones [4, 45]. This evolutionary trend is illustrated in Fig. 5. In addition, the foliar organs on the synangiophore are leaf-like, while they show highly specialized morphology in modern species. Thus, Eamesia chinensis provides the first unequivocal palaeobotanical evidence linking modern Ephedraceae to its hypothetical ancestor. This evolutionary trend was also observed in female cones of the gnetophytes [22]. The evolutionary change from a loosely arranged male shoot/spike to a compact male cone may be related to a shift in the living environment. Early Cretaceous ephedroid plants including Eamesia chinensis lived in humid forests and close to rivers/lakes as in the case of Prognetella [22], Chengia [25] and Ephedra hongtaoi [20], whereas the modern species occur in open dry deserts. We hypothesize that the compact male cones probably function more effectively than loose spikes in open environments under windy conditions. Modern Ephedra usually lives in open, dry and windy areas, is a subshrub with reduced and compact cones, whereas its relative Gnetum lives in tropical and subtropical forests, has an elongated habit (lianas or small trees) and lax spikes.

Basal species of Ephedraceae possess bisexual male cones and are entomophilous whereas the core group has unisexual male cones and are anemophilous. The shift of the pollination systems is thought to have taken place around the K/Pg boundary, possibly accompanied by evolution of pollen with pseudosulci [54]. Our new fossil species Eamesia chinensis from the Early Cretaceous possesses unisexual male cones; there is no sign of female units in the male spikes. It implies that the shift of pollination systems in Ephedraceae may have started in the Early Cretaceous.

Conclusions

Eamesia chinensis Yang, Lin, Ferguson et Wang, the first ephedroid male plant consisting of a reproductive shoot bearing male cones, is described as new to science. This new macrofossil species from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota possesses ephedroid vegetative morphology, and laxly arranged male cones with elongated internodes on the cone axis and axillary male reproductive units. The morphology of Eamesia chinensis provides direct fossil evidence for an earlier hypothesis proposing a close relationship between Cordaitales and modern Ephedraceae.

Methods

The plant fossil specimens are preserved as impressions, which were collected at Dawangzhangzi Village, Lingyuan City, Liaoning Province, northeastern China (Fig. 6). The lacustrine stratum containing the fossil specimens belongs to the Daxinfangzi Bed in the lower part of the Yixian Formation (previously known as Dawangzhangzi Bed) [55]. A few well-known angiosperm macrofossils were found in the formation, e.g. Leefructus mirus Sun et al., Hyrcantha decussata (Leng et Friis) Dilcher et al., and Archaefructus sinensis Sun et al. [5557] and other diverse plant groups (ginkgophytes, conifers, cycadophytes, pteridosperms). Radiometric dating indicates that the Daxinfangzi Bed is about 122.6–125.8 Myr old [5861]. This age corresponds to the Early Aptian - earliest Late Aptian of the Early Cretaceous in the International Stratigraphic Chart [62, 63].
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Type locality of Eamesia chinensis indicated by the black solid square (■). The map was generated using ArcGIS 9.3 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA; http://www.esri.com)

The fossil specimens were photographed with digital cameras (Olympus TG-3) and under a microscope (Nikon Eclipse E600). Images were cut and edited with Photoshop CS2 ver. 9.0. The hand-drawn reconstruction of the fossil plant was made using colored pencils, and then edited using Photoshop CS2 ver. 9.0. The map of the type locality was generated using ArcGIS 9.3 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA; http://www.esri.com).

Abbreviations

a: 

synangiophore

b: 

bract

c: 

male cone

f: 

foliar organ

l: 

leaf

m: 

male spike

n: 

node

s: 

synangia

v: 

vein

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Zeng for his assistance with photographing the male cones of Ephedra intermedia. We are also grateful to Prof. Dr. Xing YW, Dr. Barbolini N for their constructive suggestions.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770211, 31270238, 31470301].

Availability of data and materials

All data used in this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

YY, LL & YWW studied the fossils and drafted the manuscript; DF coordinated the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing, 100093, China
(2)
China Railway Group Limited, 69 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100039, China
(3)
Department of Paleontology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
(4)
Beijing Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing, 100093, China

References

  1. Pearson HHW. Gnetales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1929.Google Scholar
  2. Gugerli F, Sperisen C, Büchler U, Brunner I, Brodbeck S, Palmer JD, Qiu YL. The evolutionary split of Pinaceae from other conifers: evidence from an intron loss and a multigene phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001;21:167–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lu Y, Ran JH, Guo DM, Yang ZY, Wang XQ. Phylogeny and divergence times of gymnosperms inferred from single-copy nuclear genes. PLoS ONE. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107679.
  4. Eames A. Relationships of the Ephedrales. Phytomorph. 1952;2:79–100.Google Scholar
  5. Meyen SV. Basic features of gymnosperm systematics and phylogeny as evidenced by the fossil record. Bot Rev. 1984;50(1):112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Crane PR. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1985;72:716–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nixon KC, Crepet WL, Stevenson D, Friis EM. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1994;81:484–533.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Price RA. Systematics of the Gnetales: a review of the morphological and molecular evidence. Int J Plant Sci. 1996;157(6 Suppl):S40–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang Y, Xie L, Ferguson DK. Protognetaceae: a new gnetoid macrofossil family from the Jurassic of northeastern China. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2017;28:67–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo SX, Sha JG, Bian LZ, Qiu YL. Male spike strobiles with Gnetum affinity from the early cretaceous in western Liaoning, Northeast China. J Syst Evol. 2009;47:93–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo SX, Wu XW. Ephedrites from latest Jurassic Yixian formation in western Liaoning, Northeast China. Acta Palaeontol Sin. 2000;39:81–91.Google Scholar
  12. Krassilov VA. Diversity of Mesozoic gnetophytes and the first angiosperms. Paleontol J. 2009;43:1272–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu HM, Ferguson DK, Hueber FM, Li CS, Wang YF. Taxonomy and systematics of Ephedrites cheniae and Alloephedra xingxuei (Ephedraceae). Taxon. 2008;57:577–82.Google Scholar
  14. Liu HM, Ferguson DK, Li CS, Wang YF. New plants of Gnetales from early cretaceous of China, and its bearing on the early evolution of Ephedraceae and Welwitschiaceae in Gnetales. Chin Sci Bull. 2013;58:200–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu ZJ, Wang X. An enigmatic Ephedra-like fossil lacking micropylar tube from the lower cretaceous Yixian formation of Liaoning, China. Palaeoworld. 2016;25:67–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Rydin C, Friis EM. A new early cretaceous relative of Gnetales: Siphonospermum simplex gen. Et sp. nov. from the Yixian formation of Northeast China. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Rydin C, Wu SQ, Friis EM. Liaoxia Gnetales: ephedroids from the early cretaceous Yixian formation in Liaoning. Northeastern China Plant Syst Evol. 2006;262:239–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun G, Zheng SL, Dilcher DL, Wang YD, Mei SW. Early angiosperms and their associated plants from western Liaoning, China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technological Education Publishing House; 2001.Google Scholar
  19. Tao JR, Yang Y. Alloephedra xingxueii gen. Et sp. nov., an early cretaceous member of Ephedraceae from Dalazi formation in Yanji Basin, Jilin Province of China. Acta Palaeontol Sin. 2003;42:208–15.Google Scholar
  20. Wang X, Zheng SL. Whole fossil plants of Ephedra and their implications on the morphology, ecology and evolution of Ephedraceae Gnetales. Chin Sci Bull. 2010;55:675–83.Google Scholar
  21. Yang Y. A systematic classification of Ephedraceae: living and fossil. Phytotaxa. 2014;158:283–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang Y, Ferguson DK. Macrofossil evidence unveiling evolution and ecology of early Ephedraceae. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2015;17:331–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang Y, Geng BY, Dilcher DL, Chen ZD, Lott TA. Morphology and affinities of an early cretaceous Ephedra (Ephedraceae) from China. Am J Bot. 2005;92:231–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang Y, Lin LB, Ferguson DK. Parallel evolution of leaf morphology in gnetophytes. Org Divers Evol. 2015;15:651–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang Y, Lin LB, Wang Q. Chengia laxispicata gen. Et sp. nov., a new ephedroid plant from the early cretaceous Yixian formation of western Liaoning, Northeast China: evolutionary, taxonomic, and biogeographic implications. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang Y, Wang Q. The earliest fleshy cone of Ephedra from the early cretaceous Yixian formation of Northeast China. PLoS ONE. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053652.
  27. Krassilov VA, Dilcher DL, Douglas JG. New ephedroid plant from the lower cretaceous Koonwarra fossil bed, Victoria, Australia. Alcheringa. 1998;22:123–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Crane PR, Upchurch GR. Drewria potomacensis gen. Et sp. nov., an early cretaceous member of Gnetales from the Potomac group of Virginia. Am J Bot. 1987;74:1722–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR. New diversity among chlamydospermous seeds from the early cretaceous of Portugal and North America. Int J Plant Sci. 2013;174:530–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR. Welwitschioid diversity in the early cretaceous: evidence from fossil seeds with pollen from Portugal and eastern North America. Grana. 2014;53:175–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothwell GW, Stockey RA. Evolution and phylogeny of gnetophytes: evidence from the anatomically preserved seed cone Protoephedrites eamesii gen. Et sp. nov. and the seeds of several Bennettitalean species. Int J Plant Sci. 2013;174:511–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Rydin C, Pedersen KR, Crane PR, Friis EM. Former diversity of Ephedra (Gnetales): evidence from early cretaceous seeds from Portugal and North America. Ann Bot. 2006;98:123–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Cladera G, Fueyo GMD, de Seoane LV, Archangelsky S. Early cretaceous riparian vegetation in Patagonia, Argentina. Rev Mus Argentino Cienc Nat ns. 2007;9:49–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Dilcher DL, Bernardes-de-Oliveira ME, Pons D, Lott TA. Welwitschiaceae from the lower cretaceous of northeastern Brazil. Am J Bot. 2005;92:1294–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Löwe SA, Mohr BAR, Coiffard C, Bernardes-de-Oliveira MEC. Friedsellowia gracilifolia gen. Nov. et sp. nov., a new gnetophyte from the lower cretaceous Crato formation (Brazil). Palaeontogr Abt B. 2013;289:139–77.Google Scholar
  36. Mohr BAR, Bernardes-de-Oliveira BEC, Loveridge RF. The macrophyte flora of the Crato formation in: Martill DM, Bechly G, Loveridge RF, editors. The Crato fossil beds of Brasil: window into an ancient world. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 537–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricardi-Branco F, Torres M, Tavares SS, de Souza Carvalho I, Tavares PGE, ACA C. Itajuba yansanae gen and sp nov of Gnetales, Araripe Basin (Albian-Aptian), in Northeast Brazil. In: Zhang YZ, Ray P, editors. Climate change and regional/local responses. InTech; 2013. p. 187–205.Google Scholar
  38. Rydin C, Mohr B, Friis EM. Cratonia cotyledon gen. Et sp. nov.: a unique cretaceous seedling related to Welwitschia. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2003;270(suppl):29–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang X, Zheng SL. The earliest normal flower from Liaoning Province, China. J Integr Plant Biol. 2009;51:800–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bierhorst DW. Morphology of vascular plants. New York: Macmillan Company; 1971.Google Scholar
  41. Cutler HC. Monograph of the north American species of the genus Ephedra. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1939;26:373–426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Endress PK. Structures and function of female and bisexual organ complexes in Gnetales. Int J Plant Sci. 1996;157(supplement):113–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mehra PN. Occurrence of hermaphrodite flowers and the development of the female gametophyte in Ephedra intermedia Schrenk et Mey. Ann Bot. 1950;14:165–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Maheshwari P, Vasil V. Gnetum. New Delhi: Council Sci Industr Res; 1961.Google Scholar
  45. Mundry M, Stützel T. Morphogenesis of the reproductive shoots of Welwitschia mirabilis and Ephedra distachya (Gnetales), and its evolutionary implications. Org Divers Evol. 2004;4:91–108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou ZH. Evolutionary radiation of the Jehol biota: chronological and ecological perspectives. Geol J. 2006;41:377–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Zheng XT, O’Connor JM, Huchzermeyer F, Wang XL, Wang Y, Wang M, Zhou ZH. Preservation of ovarian follicles reveals early evolution of avian reproductive behavior. Nature. 2013;495:507–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ding QH, Zhang LD, Guo SZ, Zhang CJ, Peng YD, Jia B, Chen SW, Xing DH. Paleoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental proxies of the Yixian formation in the Beipiao area, western Liaoning. Geol Bull China. 2003;22:186–91.Google Scholar
  49. Duan SY. The oldest angiosperm—a tricarpous female reproductive fossil from western Liaoning Province, northeastern China. Sci China Ser D. 1998;41:14–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang Y. A review on gnetalean megafossils: problems and perspectives. Taiwania. 2010;55:346–54.Google Scholar
  51. Kunzmann L, Mohr BAR, Wilde V, Bernardes-de-Oliveira MEC. A putative gnetalean gymnosperm Cariria orbiculiconiformis gen. Nov. et spec. Nov. from the early cretaceous of northern Gondwana. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2011;165:75–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Krassilov VA. Early cretaceous flora of Mongolia. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1982;181:1–43.Google Scholar
  53. Hufford L. The morphology and evolution of male reproductive structures of Gnetales. Int J Plant Sci. 1996;157(suppl):95–112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Bolinder K, Humphreys AM, Ehrlen J, Alexandersson R, Ickert-Bond SM, Rydin C. From near extinction to diversification by means of a shift in pollination mechanism in the gymnosperm relict Ephedra (Ephedraceae, Gnetales). Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;180:461–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sun G, Dilcher DL, Wang HS, Chen ZD. A eudicot from the early cretaceous of China. Nature. 2011;471:625–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sun G, Ji Q, Dilcher DL, Zheng SL, Nixon KC, Wang XF. Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science. 2002;296:899–904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Dilcher DL, Sun G, Ji Q, Li HQ. An early infructescence Hyrcantha decussata (comb. nov.) from the Yixian formation in northeastern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:9370–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Peng YD, Zhang LD, Chen W, Zhang CJ, Guo SZ, Xing DH, Jia B, Chen SW, Ding QH. 40Ar/39Ar and K-Ar dating of the Yixian formation volcanic rocks, western Liaoning Province, China. Geochimica. 2003;32:427–35.Google Scholar
  59. Swisher CC, Wang YQ, Wang XL, Xu X, Wang Y. Cretaceous age for the feathered dinosaurs of Liaoning. China Nature. 1999;400:58–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang H, Liu XM, Yuan HL, Hu ZC, Diwu CR. U-Pb isotopic age of the lower Yixian formation in Lingyuan of western Liaoning and its significance. Geolog Rev. 2006;52:63–71.Google Scholar
  61. Meng FX, Gao S, Liu XM. U-Pb zircon geochronology and geochemistry of volcanic rocks of the Yixian formation in the Lingyuan area, western Liaoning. China Geolog Bull China. 2008;27:364–73.Google Scholar
  62. Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz MD, Ogg GM. The geologic time scale 2012. Boston: Elsevier; 2012.Google Scholar
  63. Walker JD, Geissman JW, Bowring SA, Babcock LE, Compilers. Geologic time scale v. 4.0: Geological Society of America. ©2012 the Geological Society of America; 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement