P1 | Hybrid | P2 | P-value |
---|
P. flavus
|
O. heterodon
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0015 |
L. trewavasae
|
H. oxyrhyncha
|
E. ornatus
| 0.0022 |
L. trewavasae
|
H. oxyrhyncha
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0023 |
L. trewavasae
|
M. mola
|
E. ornatus
| 0.0040 |
P. crabro
|
L. acuticeps
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0114 |
A. stuartgranti
|
M. conophoros
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0122 |
T. praeorbitalis
|
M. conophoros
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0124 |
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
|
E. ornatus
|
L. acuticeps
| 0.0125 |
L. trewavasae
|
P. electra
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0144 |
C. pictus
|
C. nitidus
|
P.
“Mbenji fatlip”
| 0.0148 |
P. electra
|
H. oxyrhyncha
|
C. rhoadesii
| 0.0159 |
R. longiceps
|
M. anaphyrmus
|
E. ornatus
| 0.0174 |
- Inferences of hybridization [82] among Malawi cichlids and members of the ‘hypertrophied lip’ clade as shown in bold. We examined introgression occurring between triplets of three species: 1) An initial donor species (P1), 2) a hybrid species containing putatively introgressed loci, and 3) a second hybridizing donor ‘hypertrophied lip’ species (P2). Out of the 23,310 triplicates analyzed involving all the Malawi species sampled (Additional file 8), we depict only those inferred relationships involving a hypertrophied lip clade species that was recovered in the top 50 most likely hybridization events based on the P-values obtained from HyDe