Skip to main content

Table 3: Redundancy analysis (RDA) models of morphological evolution. RDAs of morphological evolution for post-settlement selection IBMs for each island without immigration (scenario 2) and with immigration (scenario 4). * P < 0.0001

From: Evidence of local adaptation in a waterfall-climbing Hawaiian goby fish derived from coupled biophysical modeling of larval dispersal and post-settlement selection

Island

R2adj

F(4,250867)

Model parameter

Coefficient

Variance partitioned (%)

Without immigration (scenario 2)

 Kaua‘i

0.65

113964*

year

-0.99

0.63*

predation selection

0.99

16.10*

climbing selection

-0.01

0.06*

predation selection × climbing selection

0.67

0.02*

 O‘ahu

0.89

553293*

year

-0.02

0.06*

predation selection

0.99

19.96*

climbing selection

-0.04

0.04*

predation selection × climbing selection

0.66

0.23*

 Big Island

0.87

407005*

year

-0.13

1.52*

predation selection

0.98

24.42*

climbing selection

0.64

0.86*

predation selection × climbing selection

0.67

0.05*

With immigration (scenario 4)

 Kaua‘i

0.94

896157*

year

-0.01

< 0.001 *

immigration rate

-0.23

0.02 *

predation selection

0.96

25.93*

immigration rate × predation selection

0.60

1.93*

 O‘ahu

0.92

587798*

year

-0.02

< 0.001*

immigration rate

-0.29

1.37*

predation selection

0.89

43.23*

immigration rate × predation selection

0.43

11.50*

 Big Island

0.78

187930*

year

-0.04

< 0.001 *

immigration rate

-0.11

2.90*

predation selection

0.95

33.28*

immigration rate × predation selection

0.59

6.57*