Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences in phenotypic trajectories among the four Diplodus species

From: Are developmental shifts the main driver of phenotypic evolution in Diplodus spp. (Perciformes: Sparidae)?

 

Θ

ZΘ

PΘ

D

ZD

PD

D. annularis – D. puntazzo

32.39

14.118

1.00E-04

0.176

2.941

0.0049

D. annularis – D. sargus

17.37

7.299

1.00E-04

0.079

0.288

0.3538

D. annularis – D. vulgaris

21.35

8.513

1.00E-04

0.103

0.675

0.238

D. puntazzo – D. sargus

36.89

17.675

1.00E-04

0.178

2.973

0.0051

D. puntazzo – D. vulgaris

43.67

19.343

1.00E-04

0.215

3.841

0.0006

D. sargus – D. vulgaris

14.16

4.707

1.00E-04

0.067

0.604

0.7068

  1. Direction (θ = Pairwise Angles in degrees) and shape (D = Pairwise Procrustes Distance) differences of the four phenotypic trajectories across the four ontogenetic stages. The Z test value and the significance (P) obtained after 10,000 randomizations are reported for both direction and shape