- Research article
- Open Access
Comparative genomics of Mycobacterium mucogenicum and Mycobacterium neoaurum clade members emphasizing tRNA and non-coding RNA
BMC Evolutionary Biology volume 19, Article number: 124 (2019)
Mycobacteria occupy various ecological niches and can be isolated from soil, tap water and ground water. Several cause diseases in humans and animals. To get deeper insight into our understanding of mycobacterial evolution focusing on tRNA and non-coding (nc)RNA, we conducted a comparative genome analysis of Mycobacterium mucogenicum (Mmuc) and Mycobacterium neoaurum (Mneo) clade members.
Genome sizes for Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members vary between 5.4 and 6.5 Mbps with the complete MmucT (type strain) genome encompassing 6.1 Mbp. The number of tRNA genes range between 46 and 79 (including one pseudo tRNA gene) with 39 tRNA genes common among the members of these clades, while additional tRNA genes were probably acquired through horizontal gene transfer. Selected tRNAs and ncRNAs (RNase P RNA, tmRNA, 4.5S RNA, Ms1 RNA and 6C RNA) are expressed, and the levels for several of these are higher in stationary phase compared to exponentially growing cells. The rare tRNAIleTAT isoacceptor and two for mycobacteria novel ncRNAs: the Lactobacillales-derived GOLLD RNA and a homolog to the antisense Salmonella typhimurium phage Sar RNA, were shown to be present and expressed in certain Mmuc-clade members.
Phages, IS elements, horizontally transferred tRNA gene clusters, and phage-derived ncRNAs appears to have influenced the evolution of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades. While the number of predicted coding sequences correlates with genome size, the number of tRNA coding genes does not. The majority of the tRNA genes in mycobacteria are transcribed mainly from single genes and the levels of certain ncRNAs, including RNase P RNA (essential for the processing of tRNAs), are higher at stationary phase compared to exponentially growing cells. We provide supporting evidence that Ms1 RNA represents a mycobacterial 6S RNA variant. The evolutionary routes for the ncRNAs RNase P RNA, tmRNA and Ms1 RNA are different from that of the core genes.
Mycobacteria are divided into rapid and slow growing mycobacteria, RGM and SGM. Among SGM, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) causes tuberculosis (TB) while the non-pathogenic RGM Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msmeg) is frequently used as a mycobacterial model system. Both SGM and RGM can inhabit various environmental reservoirs such as ground and tap water, soil, animals and humans. They can form aggregates and biofilms and appear to have a growth advantage in water that contains disinfecting agents [1,2,3,4].
The RGM Mycobacterium mucogenicum (Mmuc) was first reported as a Mycobacterium chelonae-like bacteria in connection with a peritonitis outbreak in 1982 [5,6,7]. On the basis of partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene Mmuc was later proposed to be a new taxon and the name reflects that it is highly mucoid when grown on solid media [3, 8,9,10]. M. mucogenicum together with Mycobacterium phocaicum (Mpho) and Mycobacterium aubagnense (Maub) constitute the Mmuc-clade [3, 9,10,11]. These RGM are water-borne and Mmuc is claimed to be one of the most abundant non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) in tap water and it is found in sewage and in hospital water systems. They are opportunistic pathogens and have been demonstrated to be associated with various infections and they show high tolerance against first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs such as isoniazid, rifampin and pyrazinamide [3, 5, 7, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Moreover, strains of the phylogenetically close mycobacteria Mycobacterium neoaurum (Mneo) and Mycobacterium cosmeticum (Mcos), which both belong to the Mneo-clade, have also been isolated from patients suffering from various infections [21,22,23,24]. Together this emphasizes the importance of this group of NTMs and provided an incentive for a comparative genomic analysis of these closely related species.
The tRNA genes are implicated to be targets for integration of foreign DNA [25, 26] and in bacteria their number and gene synteny vary. For example, the 4.6 Mbp long Escherichia coli K12 MG1655 genome carries 86 while Streptomyces coelicolor (genome size, 8.7 Mbp) encodes 65 tRNA genes [27, 28]. On the basis of available data, it appears that the number of tRNA genes in several mycobacteria such as MtbH37Rv (genome size, 4.4 Mbp) and Msmeg (genome size, 7 Mbp) do not exceed 50 [29,30,31,32]. Given the seemingly low number of tRNA genes among mycobacteria we were interested to understand whether this is also the case for other mycobacteria. Moreover, a preliminary survey of tRNA gene organization in mycobacteria such as MtbH37Rv and Msmeg indicates that many tRNA are transcribed from single genes, which is in contrast to other bacteria, e.g., E. coli and Bacillus subtilis [27, 29, 30, 33]. We were therefore interested in finding whether this might also apply to other mycobacteria focusing on the NTM discussed above. In this context, our understanding of non-coding (nc) RNA in mycobacteria, apart from MtbH37Rv and Msmeg , is scarce. Hence, we also decided to conduct a comparative genomic analysis focusing on ncRNA genes in Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members to understand absence and presence of ncRNA genes with respect to phylogeny and their evolution. We were particularly interested to study ncRNAs with implicated functions in RNA processing, gene regulation and gene expression such as RNase P RNA, the catalytic subunit of the tRNA processing endoribonuclease P, RNase P .
We report that genome sizes among Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members, including the complete genome of the Mmuc type strain, vary between approximately 5.4 to 6.5 Mbp (see also the NCBI database). Comparative genomic analysis (17 genomes in total) provide some insight into how some of the characteristics of these genomes such as genome size, common and unique genes, and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) might be manifested as phenotypic differences. Specifically, the number of tRNA genes vary between 46 and 79 (including one pseudo tRNA gene) with Maub having the highest number; 39 tRNA genes were predicted to be present in all studied mycobacteria. For those species having higher number of tRNA genes our data suggest that several have been acquired through HGT and we show that some of these are expressed. Moreover, predicted ncRNA genes range between 28 and 46, and while some are species specific others are also present in MtbH37Rv and Msmeg, and for some ncRNAs, e.g. RNase P RNA, the evolutionary routes are different from that of the core genes. Finally, we provide supportive data suggesting that one of the ncRNAs, Ms1 RNA, represents a mycobacterial 6S RNA variant, which in other bacteria acts as a global regulator.
Strains and cultivation
The M. mucogenicum DSM44124 (MmucT), M. phocaicum DSM45104 (MphoT), M. aubagnense DSM45150 (MaubT), M. neoaurum DSM44074 (MneoT) and M. cosmeticum DSM44829 (McosT) type strains were obtained from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen in Germany and grown under conditions as recommended by the supplier. The DNA was isolated and purified as previously described .
Genome sequencing, assembly and annotation
The MmucT whole genome sequencing was performed at the NGI-Uppsala Genome Center using the PacBio technology and the average read length was 10936 bp and the median coverage ≈101x. The genomes of the other four Mycobacterium spp., MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT, were sequenced at the SNP&SEQ Technology Platform using the Illumina-Hiseq2000 platform at Uppsala University, Uppsala with an average read length of 100 bp and a median coverage of ≈176x. The PacBio-generated reads were assembled using the SMART-analysis HGAP3 assembly pipeline  and polished using Quiver (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The Illumina generated reads were assembled using the A5-assembly pipeline [37, 38] as previously described . For the annotation of rRNA genes we used RNAmmer version 1.2  and for annotation of tRNA genes the tRNAScan-SE program version 1.23 . Small ncRNA genes were predicted using the Rfam version 12.1 database and INFERNAL (version 1.1.2) with a threshold cut off value of ≥34 [41,42,43,44,45].
To predict open reading frames (i.e., coding sequences, CDS), we used the PROKKA software (version 1.10; ). For functional classification all predicted CDS were subjected to BLASTp against the RAST subsystem database (http://rast.nmpdr.org/, last accessed May 5, 2015;  using the BLAST approach ).
Plasmids, Phage DNA and IS-elements
To predict the presence of plasmid sequences, the scaffolds of the different mycobacterial draft genomes were sorted and aligned using the closest reference genome (MmucT; complete genome) and the Mauve software (version 2.3.1 ). The aligned scaffolds were subsequently concatenated and subjected to BLAST search against the NCBI plasmid database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/release/plasmid/, accessed March 2015; May 2019).
The presence of IS elements in the complete MmucT genome was predicted using the ISsaga server and manually inspected searching for inverted repeats and presence of transposase genes .
Core gene analysis
Translated protein coding sequences (CDS) were extracted for the target genomes and combined with CDSs from available Mycobacterium spp. to generate a BLAST database. A reciprocal BLAST was performed using the BLASTp and the PanOCT (version 1.9) with the following parameter settings, identity of at least 45%, query coverage >70% and e-value cutoff 1e-05 . The predicted orthologous genes were also subjected to gene synteny analysis using PanOCT .
Phylogenetic analysis and average nucleotide identity
Single gene phylogenies were generated based on the 16S rRNA gene, rnpB, ssrA, ffh and the Ms1 RNA gene. The respective gene sequences were extracted from the five genomes (MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT) and 104 publicly available mycobacterial genomes from the NCBI data base. The homologous genes were identified using the PanOCT ortholog. Single (16S rDNA, rnpB, ssrA, ffh and the Ms1 RNA gene) and core genes were aligned using the MAFFT (version 7.147b) software . Phylogenetic trees based on 16S rDNA, core genes and multiple sequence alignments were computed using the FastTree version 2.1.7  and figures were generated using the FigTree Software version 1.3.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
The Jspecies tool was used to calculate the average nucleotide identity (ANI) values. ANI values were clustered using an unsupervised hierarchical clustering algorithm and plotted using "R" environment [56,57,58].
RNA extraction and northern analysis
MmucT and MaubT were grown in liquid 7H9 medium (including 10% OADC supplement and 0.25% Tween 80) at 37°C and 100 rpm rotation. At exponential (OD600 = 0.3-0.5) and stationary (OD600 = 5-6) growth phases, cells were pelleted and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted following the protocol described elsewhere . Triplicate samples/independent cultures (10 μg RNA from MaubT and 15 μg from MmucT per sample) from each growth phase were then separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel and electroblotted to a Hybond N+ membrane as previously described . The membranes were then probed with 32P-5'-end-labelled DNA oligonucleotide, washed, and exposed to a phosphorimager screen. See Additional file 1: Table S1 for DNA oligonucleotide sequences and hybridization temperatures (for specifics see ).
Genome assembly and annotation
The size of the complete MmucT genome is 6,099,273 while the sizes for the draft MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT genomes are 5,771,543; 6,191,633; 5,477,923 and 6,446,208 base pairs, respectively (Fig. 1a; Table 1). The GC-content for the five species was calculated to be in the range 66.3% to 68.3%. The complete MmucT genome includes 5881 protein-coding sequences (CDS), two ribosomal RNA operons, 57 tRNA genes and 33 non-coding (nc) RNA genes. For the other four species, the number of CDS range from 5199 to 6270 genes, which correlates with their respective genome size (Table 1). Moreover, for MneoT and McosT 46 tRNA genes were identified, while MphoT and MaubT carry 60 and 79 (among these one pseudo tRNA gene) tRNA genes, respectively. The Rfam annotated ncRNA genes in MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT were 45, 41, 34 and 28, respectively (Table 1; in total 14 mycobacteria analyzed). In Table 1 we give a basic description of 14 of the genomes analyzed in this study. Genome assembly, gene annotation and Genbank accession numbers are summarized in Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S2.
Genome alignment, presence of plasmid DNA, phages and IS-elements
Whole genome alignment revealed that the close neighboring species MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT share large segments of homology. It appears that MmucT, MphoT and MaubT show higher homology compared to MneoT and McosT, while chromosomal rearrangements (insertions and translocations) seem to have happened comparing MneoT and McosT (Fig. 1b). However, we cannot exclude that this is due to draft genome status. Alignment of the 16 genomes (except M. sp. URHB0044) is presented in Additional file 1: Figure S1 (note that we analyzed two versions of McosDSM44829 and MneoDSM44074). Unless otherwise stated, below we focus on the five type strains, MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT.
We did not detect any plasmids or plasmid fragments in any of the five type strains (MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT) while phage sequence stretches were predicted to be present (Table 1; for details see Additional file 1: Table S3). In MmucT three intact prophage regions were predicted using PHASTER (score, >90; see Methods). These regions were not detected in any of the other four species. Two additional phage segments, classified as "questionable" (score, 70 to 90) and "incomplete" (score, <70), were predicted in MmucT. All these phage sequences likely belong to the Myocbacterium phage group since the majority of the CDS show high homology with mycobacterial phage CDS. One of the intact phages positioned at the genomic location of 5.63 to 5.68 Mbps is 45.3 kbp long where 20 out 60 CDS show similarities to the Mycobacterium phage Bernal13 (Fig. 1b; [50, 51]).
For the complete MmucT genome we predicted 23 IS elements (for two of these we were unable to identify inverted repeat sequences) representing eight different types (Additional file 1: Table S4a). IS-elements were also predicted in the MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT draft genomes (Additional file 1: Table S4b), but their precise locations were not defined. For these four strains the number of IS elements vary and MphoT carries 65 predicted IS elements. The highest number was detected in MmucLZSF01 for which we predicted 85 IS elements (Additional file 1: Table S4b).
Taken together this suggests that phage and IS elements likely have had an impact on the evolution of these type strains.
Identification of core genes and phylogenetic analysis
To construct phylogenetic trees, we first used 291 core genes present in MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT and 104 mycobacterial genomes available at the NCBI genome database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/). Second, to get deeper insights into the phylogenetic relationship within the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades we identified 2226 core genes predicted to be present in the members of these two clades, including the recently released draft Mmuc genomes (strains MmucLZSF01, MmucLZLC01 and MmucCSURP2099; Additional file 1: Figure S1), and in M. sp. URHB0044 (in total 17 species; Table 1; M. sp. URHB0044 was chosen as an outgroup). Functional classification of the 291 and 2226 core genes revealed that the majority (>60%) of the classified genes belongs to the subsystems "Amino Acids and Derivatives", "Cofactors, Vitamins…Pigments", "Carbohydrates", "Protein Metabolism" and "Fatty Acids, Lipids, and Isoprenoids" (Additional file 2: Figure S2a, b).
Both core phylogenetic trees are in agreement and suggested that MmucT, MphoT and MaubT are close neighbors to four other Mycobacterium spp., M. sp. 360MFT, M. sp. UNC410, M. llatzerense strain CLUC14 and M. sp. UNC280 (referred to as Msp360, Msp410, Mllat, and Msp280, respectively; Table 1). Hence it appears that these mycobacteria belong to the Mmuc-clade . The MneoT and McosT cluster together with other Mcos and Mneo strains in the Mneo-clade (Fig. 2a, b; Additional file 2: Figure S3a; ). Moreover, MmucLZLC01 and MmucCSURP2099 are positioned close to MmucT except MmucLZSF01, which is closer to MphoT (Fig. 2a, b). Also, inspection of the Mneo-clade suggested that the MneoVKMAc-1815D constitutes a separate branch of Mneo (Fig. 2a; see Discussion; for comparison with 16S rDNA phylogeny see Additional file 2: Figure S3a, b).
Analysis of the average nucleotide identity, ANI, also grouped the 17 mycobacteria in accordance with their position in the core (2226 genes) phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2b, c).
Taken together, the phylogenetic data revealed that the positioning of these mycobacteria was in accordance with our current understanding of the mycobacterial phylogeny [3, 61,62,63; and our unpublished data]. The data further suggested that MmucLZSF01 is a Mpho strain and that MneoVKMAc-1815D should be considered as a separate species or Mneo subspecies (see Discussion).
Number of tRNA genes, their organization and expression of selected tRNA genes
The number of predicted tRNA genes in MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT were 57, 60, 79 (including one pseudo tRNA gene), 46 and 46, respectively, with MaubT having the highest number (Table 1; Fig. 3; Additional file 3: Figure S4a). However, this is not related to which clade these species belong to since Msp280 and Mllat have 46 and 47, respectively, which is the same as observed for members of the Mneo-clade (Fig. 2). The different Mmuc strains (MmucT, MmucLZSF01, MmucLZLC01 and MmucCSURP2099) all harbor the same number of predicted tRNA genes with the exception of MmucLZSF01, which is positioned close to MphoT (Table 1; Fig. 2). Of the 119 predicted tRNA genes, 39 are common to members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades and they cover all 20 amino acids (Additional file 3: Figure S4a).
Larger clusters of tRNA genes with more than four genes as in MmucT, MphoT and MaubT are uncommon among mycobacteria (Fig. 3; Additional file 3: Figure S4b-e; Table S5; of note, clusters of tRNA genes with more than four genes were not found to be present in the Mneo-clade members; see Discussion). Among the 78 tRNA genes in MaubT 33 are unique and 32 were predicted to cluster in one region (the "32 tRNA gene" cluster) and transcribed from the same DNA (lagging) strand (tRNA genes constituting this cluster were present on three scaffolds but see Discussion; Additional file 3: Figure S4c).
MmucT and MphoT carry a structurally different tRNA gene cluster with 11 and 14 tRNA genes, respectively (cf. Fig. 3 and Additional file 3: Figure S4b). Apart from the presence of the three extra genes in MphoT, which encode for tRNATrpCCA, tRNAGlyTCC and tRNALeuCAA, the gene synteny of this tRNA gene cluster is the same in these two mycobacteria (Fig. 3b). Moreover, the structures (based on their gene sequences) for the majority of the tRNA genes comprising this cluster are the same with one notable exception, the tRNAHis gene. In MphoT this tRNA gene carries one additional nucleobase and "mutations" in the region corresponding to the anticodon stem, which results in a distorted stem (Additional file 3: Figure S5; alignment of all predicted tRNA genes). Compared to their corresponding tRNA isoacceptor genes located elsewhere in the genome predicted that all the tRNA isoacceptors originating from the cluster were structurally different. For example, the cluster encoded tRNALeuTAG isoacceptor has a short variable loop whereas the isoacceptor present in all Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members has an expected "normal" larger variable loop (Additional file 3: Figure S5).
Genes encoding the tRNA isoacceptors tRNAIleTAT and tRNAArgTCG were detected to be present (and part of a larger tRNA gene cluster) only in MmucT and MphoT (see above), and in Msp360, Msp410, MmucCSURP2099, MmucLZSF01 and MmucLZSC01. Analysis of the gene synteny of this cluster in these mycobacteria (not shown for MmucLZSF01 and MmucLZLC01) predicted the presence of an HNH endonuclease gene within this cluster while this ortholog is missing in the other ten mycobacteria (Fig. 3b). The finding that MaubT lacks this tRNA gene cluster, in combination with that it is positioned closer to the ancestor (Fig. 2a, b; Additional file 2: Figure S3a) than the other Mmuc-clade members argues for the possibility that the tRNA gene cluster might have been acquired after MaubT diverged from the other Mmuc-clade members.
To understand whether the tRNA isoacceptors encoded from the tRNA gene cluster are expressed we focused on tRNAIleTAT, tRNAArgTCG and tRNAIleGAT and included the tRNAIleGAT isoacceptor encoded from another location in MmucT. On the basis of the data presented in Fig. 4 we conclude that these four tRNA isoacceptors are expressed and their levels are higher in cells in stationary phase than in exponentially growing cells.
We previously reported the presence of two tRNACysGCA genes, one of which is commonly present in mycobacteria while the other is present in some RGM . Two tRNACysGCA genes were also predicted to be present in the members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades while three were predicted for MaubT with one located within the "32 tRNA gene cluster". Gene alignment revealed that the structure of the third tRNACysGCA gene differs from the other two isoacceptors (see above; Additional file 3: Figures S4c and S5). All three MaubT tRNACys isoacceptor genes were expressed and the levels were similar in exponentially growing and stationary cells, if anything, slightly increased in stationary phase cells (Fig. 4; see also the Discussion).
It should be noted that genes encoding tRNASelCys or selB appear not to be present in any of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clade member genomes. Also, no tRNA genes were predicted to be positioned in the ribosomal RNA operons.
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, AARS
The tRNAs depend on the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) for their function. We therefore analyzed members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades for the presence of AARS genes (Fig. 5a; Additional file 3: Table S6a). While 18 AARS genes were predicted to be present in these genomes we were unable to identify any homologous genes for asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS) and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) in keeping with previous findings [64, 65]. For bacteria that lack AsnRS and GlnRS genes, tRNA charging of asparagine and glutamine can be accommodated using the tRNA-dependent amidotransferase pathway (Adt), which includes GatCAB . Accordingly, gatCAB homologs were predicted in the 16 genomes suggesting that the Adt pathway is operating in these mycobacteria (Additional file 3: Table S6b; of note, gatA was not predicted to be present in Msp410 possibly due to draft genome status).
The Mtb isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) is eukaryotic like . Hence, we were interested in understanding whether this is also the case for the members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades. Only a single IleRS gene copy was predicted to be present in these mycobacteria and our analysis suggested that all encode a eukaryotic like IleRS (Additional file 3: Figure S6a).
We also predicted genes encoding AARS paralogs in some of the mycobacteria (Additional file 3: Supplementary text; Figure S6b-f; Table S6a, c) and genes encoding cyclodipeptide synthetases (CDPSs) in the Mneo strains (Additional file 3: Figure S7a, b). In MtbH37Rv this enzyme can hijack aminoacylated tRNAs resulting in formation of cyclodipeptides that subsequently are used for mycocyclosin biosynthesis [68,69,70,71]. Prediction of the CDPS gene in Mneo strains suggests that it can be present in both SGM and RGM.
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) were predicted for members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades as well as M. sp. URBH0044 using the Rfam database (Fig. 1 and Table 1; Additional file 4: Table S7). Using these 17 mycobacterial genomes, we predicted 46 ncRNAs which grouped into eight different categories: 1) small sRNAs, 2) antisense RNAs, 3) gene, ribozyme (RNase P RNA), 4) cis-regulatory riboswitches, 5) cis-regulatory thermoregulators, 6) cis-regulatory RNAs, 7) Introns and 8) gene, e.g. tmRNA. Of these, 18 ncRNA genes were predicted to be present in all 17 species/strains while others were predicted to be present in and unique to a specific species: ctRNA_p42d and Sar RNA in MmucT, GOLLD (Giant, Ornate, Lake- and Lactobacillales-Derived; ) RNA in MaubT, Intron gpII RNA in MphoT and cis-reg ykkC-yxkD RNA in McosT (Additional file 4: Figure S8; Table S7). The size for the corresponding ncRNAs ranged from approximately 50 nucleotides (Ms_AS-5) to roughly 400 nucleotides (RNase P RNA, tmRNA) and >400 nucleotides (GOLLD RNA; Additional file 4: Figure S8b). Below we focus on RNase P RNA, tmRNA, 4.5S RNA, GOLLD RNA, Ms1 RNA ("6S RNA"), 6C RNA and Sar RNA.
RNase P RNA, tmRNA and 4.5S RNA
As expected genes encoding RNase P RNA (rnpB), tmRNA (ssrA) and 4.5S RNA (ffs) were identified in the genomes for all Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. Alignments suggest that ssrA and ffs are well conserved whereas rnpB show more diversity (Additional file 4: Figure S9a-f) consistent with it being a good biomarker for mycobacterial species identification . We also noted that the ssrA (tmRNA) encoded C-terminal protein tag is well conserved compared to MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 with variation only at the fourth position (His or Asn; Fig. 5b). Analyzing the location of the genes encoding proteins that interact with these RNAs [the C5 protein (rnpA, RNase P), SmpB (smpB, tmRNA) and the Ffh protein (ffh, 4.5S RNA)] revealed that, as in other bacteria (e.g., E. coli), the protein coding genes are separated relative to the chromosomal locations for the respective RNA coding genes rnpB, ssrA and ffs (Additional file 4: Figure S9a, c, e). This raises the question how the expression of these gene pairs is regulated, which warrants further studies. In the meantime, measuring the levels of expression of RNase P RNA, tmRNA and 4.5S RNA by northern analysis showed higher levels in stationary MmucT and MaubT cells than in exponentially growing cells (Fig. 6; Additional file 4: Figure S10; for MaubT we only measured the levels for tmRNA).
We generated phylogenetic trees for rnpB, ssrA and ffs extracted from 113 mycobacterial genomes (Additional file 4: Figure S9g-i). Interestingly, in comparison to the core phylogeny (Additional file 2: Figure S3a) these three ncRNA genes position the Mmuc-clade and in particular the Mneo strains closer to the mycobacterial ancestor. Moreover, the rnpB and ssrA present in Mmuc-clade members have the Mneo homologs as their ancestors. For ssrA, Mmuc- and M. chelonae-clade members, and McosT share the same ancestor, Mneo. Noteworthy, based on core phylogeny M. chelonae-clade members are considered to be the earliest diverging mycobacterial lineage (Additional file 2: Figure S3a [61,62,63]; unpublished). In conclusion, it appears that the evolutionary route for these ncRNAs is different compared to the core genes.
The large GOLLD (>400 nucleotides long; Additional file 4: Figure S11a) RNA was only predicted to be present in MaubT. The predicted gene is part of two scaffolds. However, its gene synteny is supported by the presence of the GOLLD RNA gene on one contig in two other Mycobacterium spp., e.g. Mycobacterium abscessus M24 and Mycobacterium conceptionense strain MLE (Additional file 4: Figure S11a; NCBI database; we cannot conclusively exclude the presence of multiple GOLLD RNA gene copies; see also the Discussion). The gene is located within the "32 tRNA cluster" with tRNA genes present both up- and downstream of the GOLLD RNA gene. In addition, a pseudo tRNA gene is predicted to be located within the GOLLD RNA gene (Additional file 4: Figure S11b).
Northern blot analysis suggested that GOLLD RNA is expressed in MaubT at a low level, as judged from the weak signal. The level was two-fold higher in stationary phase compared to exponentially growing cells (Fig. 6b, c; Additional file 4: Figure S10) following the same trend as for RNase P RNA, tmRNA and 4.5S RNA (see above). No expression of the predicted pseudo tRNA gene located within the GOLLD RNA gene could be detected, in spite of putative σB promoters upstream of the pseudo tRNA gene (Additional file 4: Figure S11a; see Discussion).
Ms1 RNA ("6S RNA") and 6C RNA
The gene encoding Ms1 RNA was predicted to be present in all members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades as well as in other available mycobacterial and Actinobacteria genomes (Fig. 7a; Additional file 4: Figure S12). Comparing gene synteny for the Ms1 RNA region (and sequence alignment) in mycobacteria and Streptomyces coelicolor revealed that the Ms1 RNA gene is positioned where the 6S RNA gene maps in S. coelicolor  (Additional file 4: Figure S12a, b). This supports the notion that Ms1 RNA might be a mycobacterial variant of 6S RNA ; see Discussion. A phylogenetic Ms1 DNA tree further suggests that the gene present in Mneo strains and Mmuc-clade members is close to the mycobacterial ancestral gene (Additional file 4: Figure S12c). We also note that in this tree the M. chelonae- and Mmuc-clades are positioned close together indicating the evolutionary path of the Ms1 RNA gene.
Northern analysis suggested that Ms1 RNA is expressed in MmucT and that its level of expression is higher in stationary cells (Fig. 7b, c; Additional file 4: Figure S10; the reason for two bands in one of the samples is unknown but might be related to degradation).
Secondary structural models of the Ms1 RNA were generated based on the MmucT Ms1 RNA sequence using the M-fold tool/ RNA-fold (Fig. 7d). Comparing the predicted Ms1 RNA structures of MmucT, MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT revealed nucleotide variations in several regions marked with dashed boxes (Fig. 7d). Several of these changes are consistent with the predicted Ms1 RNA secondary structure. Noteworthy, unconventional base pairing such as G•A base pairs distort the helical structure and these distortions might be part of a protein binding site(s).
Close to the Ms1 RNA gene we identified the presence of the gene encoding 6C RNA, which is widespread among Actinobacteria [76, 77]. Its location relative to the Ms1 RNA gene is conserved, with one gene in between, comparing the mycobacteria studied here and S. coelicolor (Fig. 7a; Additional file 4: Figure S12a). Sequence alignment also suggested that 6C RNA is highly conserved among mycobacteria belonging to the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades (Additional file 4: Figure S12d). Although its function in mycobacteria is unclear it is expressed in exponentially growing MmucT cells and stationary cells with a significantly higher level in stationary cells (Fig. 7b, c; see Discussion).
The 6C RNA secondary structure was manually folded and resulted in a stable structure composed of three helices, P1 to P3, with two C-rich loop structures (Fig. 7e).
Sar antisense RNA
The ncRNA categorized as Sar antisense RNA was predicted to be unique to MmucT (and MmucCSURP2099) and located in a phage region (0.65 Mbp region; Fig. 1b; Additional file 4: Figure S8a, b; Table S7). The homology to other Sar RNA genes is low . The MmucT Sar RNA gene is expressed and the level was modestly higher in stationary cells compared to exponentially growing cells (Fig. 7a, c). In Salmonella typhimurium Sar RNA was identified as a regulator during development of the temperate bacteriophage P22 . Its function in MmucT is unknown. But, the gene is located in the intergenic region between two genes (MUCO_DSM00642 and MUCO_DSM00643) encoding proteins of unknown function where the former encodes a signal peptide, while the Sar RNA gene is transcribed from the opposite strand. It is therefore conceivable that this RNA is involved in regulating the expression of either of these genes or both.
ncRNAs, comparison with other mycobacteria
We also predicted ncRNA genes in MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 using the Rfam data base (Additional file 4: Figure S8; Table S7; see also  and Refs therein). This comparison revealed that 18 (out of 20) ncRNA genes present in the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades are also present in MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155. There are also seven ncRNA genes in MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 for which no orthologs could be found in the 17 genomes (Table 1; Additional file 4: Figure S8). Moreover, the Intron_gpII RNA (Rfam annotation, RF00029), which is present in two copies in MtbH37Rv, is also predicted to be present in MphoT with three copies (Additional file 4: Figure S13a, b). The sequences of the three MphoT gene copies are similar but they differ from the two genes in MtbH37Rv. Comparison of their gene synteny revealed that for MtbH37Rv both Intron_gpII RNA genes are located within genes while for MphoT the three Intron_gpII RNA genes were predicted to be present in intergenic regions (Additional file 4: Figure S13a). Together this suggested that the Intron_gpII RNA ncRNA genes in these two mycobacteria likely are of different origin.
The size of the genomes for Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members including type strains range between 5.4 to 6.5 Mbp. Core gene phylogeny based on 291 core genes present in 109 mycobacterial genomes and genes common to the Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members and M. sp. URHB0044 positioned the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades next to one another (Fig. 2a; Additional file 2: Figure S3). The tree based on 2226 genes present in 17 mycobacteria and ANI values cluster the Mmuc-clade members (Fig. 2) and indicated that MmucLZSF01 is closer to MphoT than it is to MmucT. Hence, MmucLZSF01 should be considered to be a Mpho strain. Consistent with this is also the finding that the numbers of tRNA genes in MphoT and MmucLZSF01 are conserved, as are the structures of 14 tRNA genes encompassing this cluster, while the corresponding cluster in MmucT lacks three tRNA genes (see below). This analysis also indicates that Msp360 and Msp410 are likely to be two Mmuc strains. Considering the Mneo-clade, the positioning of MneoVKMAc-1815D deviates from the other Mneo strains including the type strain MneoT. This raises the question whether MneoVKMAc-1815D should be considered as a subspecies of Mneo or perhaps a different species. For M. sp. URHB0044, our data does not provide any information about which clade it belongs to and possibly it is a new mycobacterial species.
Variation in tRNA among Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members
The number of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) correlates with genome size while the number of tRNA coding genes does not (Table 1). This is also apparent by comparing the number of tRNA genes in the SGM MtbH37Rv (4.4 Mbp; ) and RGM MsmegMC2-155 (7 Mbp; ), which carry 45 and 47 tRNA genes, respectively. Evidently, the number of tRNA genes does not relate to differences in growth rates. Analyzing the tRNA gene organization in the complete MmucT genome, in total 57 tRNA genes, suggests that the majority of the tRNA genes are transcribed from single genes (32 of 46; not considering the cluster having 11 tRNA genes, which are predicted to be transcribed from two operons, one encompassing eight and the other three genes; Fig. 3). The remaining predicted tRNA operons encode two (four operons) and three (two operons) tRNA genes (Fig. 3a; Additional file 3: Figure S4b-e). This is similar to MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 where 31 of 45 and 33 of 47, respectively, appear to be transcribed from single tRNA genes. The remaining tRNA genes in these two mycobacteria are predicted to be transcribed from operons with two or three tRNA genes and these are the same as those predicted in MmucT (Additional file 3: Figure S4a, b). In other bacteria, such as the Gram negative E. coli K12 and the Gram positive Firmicutes (e.g., B. subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus), the tRNA genes are transcribed from large operons [27, 33, 79,80,81,82,83,84]. For example, a cluster of as many as 27 tRNA was identified in S. aureus . This is in contrast to mycobacteria in which tRNAs in general appear to be transcribed mainly from single genes. This is also supported from our analysis of the tRNA genes in the draft genomes of MphoT, MaubT, MneoT and McosT (Additional file 3: Figure S4b-e).
Several of the tRNA genes that are common to MmucT, MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2155 (for which complete genomes are available) are positioned at different locations on the circular chromosome suggesting rearrangements of these tRNA genes after these mycobacteria diverged (Additional file 5: Figure S14a, b). However, the positioning of the tRNA genes near the origin of replication, oriC, appears to be conserved comparing MmucT, MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 (oriC, its location is predicted on the basis of the positioning of dnaA, dnaN and rpmH; [32, 85]; positioning of oriC is also supported by the GC skew, see Fig. 1). In this context, certain intergenic regions in MtbH37Rv have been identified as necessary for optimal growth and 11 specific tRNA genes are located in these regions . The same tRNA genes are located at roughly the same positions (with the same orientation) on the MmucT chromomosome except for the tRNAThr(GGT) and tRNAMet(CAT) genes, which have been re-located (Additional file 5: Figure S14a, b). This raises interesting questions with respect to whether it is the tRNA genes and their expression that are needed for optimal growth or if it is their location on the chromosome in relation to oriC. Thus, it would be interesting to follow the same protocol as Zhang et al.  using other mycobacteria such as MmucT to address these questions.
Horizontally transferred tRNA gene clusters
For MmucT and MphoT (and MmucCSURP2099, Msp360 and Msp410) we identified tRNA gene clusters carrying 11 and 14 tRNA genes, respectively, while MaubT carries a different cluster encoding 32 tRNA genes. On the basis of gene synteny and tRNA gene sequence this latter 32 tRNA gene cluster is likely to be of a different origin than the clusters in MmucT and MphoT (see also below), which are the same apart from that MmucT lacks three tRNA genes. Moreover, compared to the commonly present tRNAs the sequences for the genes encompassing these clusters suggest that they encode for structurally different tRNAs. Hence, it is likely that these tRNA gene clusters are the result of horizontal gene transfer and that this occurred after MmucT and MphoT diverged from MaubT. This is supported by the presence of homing HNH endonuclease genes within these tRNA gene clusters. Homing endonucleases are known to be involved in moving genes [87, 88] including tRNA genes as in E. coli bacteriophages . It is therefore plausible that these large tRNA gene clusters present in MmucT, MphoT and MaubT originate from phages.
In the MmucT-MphoT tRNA cluster, the HNH endonuclease gene is positioned between blocks of eight and three genes (six in MphoT; Fig. 3b). Among the eight tRNA genes, one encodes tRNAIle(TAT). This tRNA gene is not present in members of the Mneo-clade, MaubT or MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 and it reads AUA codons. The AUA codon is rare among members of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades, while it is more abundant in MtbH37Rv (unpublished data). When the tRNAIle(TAT) gene is missing the AUA codon is read by tRNAIle(CAT) carrying a lysidine (L, 2-lysyl-cytidine) instead of C at position 34 (underlined). The enzyme responsible for this modification is TilS  and all the Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members (and MtbH37Rv) have TilS homologs. The MmucT tRNAIle(TAT) is expressed and the level is higher in stationary cells. Taken together, for those mycobacteria having the tRNAIle(TAT) gene there appears to be two ways to decode AUA; whether this arrangement gives any advantage remains to be investigated. Also, since the number of tRNA genes in the MmucT-MphoT tRNA cluster differ makes it possible to use this as a marker to differentiate these two species.
In contrast to the MmucT-MphoT tRNA cluster, the MaubT gene cluster encompasses both tRNA and protein genes. Large tRNA gene clusters have previously been reported to be present in M. abscessus M24 (34 tRNA genes; ) and M. conceptionense MLE (37 tRNA genes; NCBI bioproject id PRJNA288077; see also ). The majority of the tRNA genes encompassing the MaubT cluster are also present in the M. abscessus M24 and M. conceptionense MLE clusters (Additional file 3: Figure S11b; Table S5). In these three mycobacteria, this cluster also encodes GOLLD RNA and HNH endonuclease. This large ncRNA (>400 nucleotides long) was first identified in Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 367 . The GOLLD RNA is expressed in MaubT albeit at a low level. Its function, however, is not known but it is associated with a prophage and its expression is linked to phage production. Interestingly, in many instances the GOLLD RNA gene is present close to the location of tRNA genes and it also encodes a predicted tRNA gene  and for MaubT our data suggests that this gene corresponds to a pseudo tRNA gene. Moreover, our phylogenetic analysis indicates that the mycobacterial GOLLD RNA genes likely are of phage origin (unpublished data). Together, this suggests that this large "32 tRNA gene" cluster in MaubT, which includes the GOLLD RNA gene and a HNH endonuclease gene, is the result of horizontal gene transfer.
The MaubT "32 tRNA gene" cluster harbors an additional tRNACys gene equipping MaubT with three tRNACys genes (that are expressed; Fig. 4). Noteworthy, Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members as well as MsmegMC2-155 all have two while MtbH37Rv has one tRNACys gene (for other RGM, see [31, 32]; Additional files 3 and 5: Figures S4, S5 and S14). Inspection of their secondary structures reveals that the two extra tRNACys both have four base pairs long anticodon stems with the potential to form non-Watson-Crick base pairs, C27-U43 (additional tRNACys gene present in all Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members) and A27-C43 (tRNACys gene present only in MaubT). Whether this influences function or if these extra tRNACys isoacceptors indeed are functional or influence growth remains to be investigated.
RNase P processing and tRNA gene structure
The tRNA genes are transcribed as precursors (pre-tRNAs) and the endoribonuclease P (RNase P) is responsible for generating the tRNA 5' termini. The majority of tRNAs carry a guanosine at their 5' ends, referred to as G+1, and seven base pairs long amino acid acceptor (aa-) stems. The residue immediately 5' (the -1 position; N-1) of G+1 at the RNase P cleavage site in pre-tRNAs has been suggested to interact with the conserved residue A248 (E. coli numbering) in the RNA subunit of RNase P (RPR) while G+1 is suggested to act as a guiding nucleotide ( and Refs therein). The majority (≈60%) of the tRNA genes in E. coli have a U at -1, while in mycobacteria the occurrence of U at this position is below 20%. Interestingly, G at -1 is frequent in mycobacteria and can be as high as 30% (Additional file 5: Figure S15). These observations lead to two important points. First, mycobacteria have A at the corresponding "248 position" in the RPR. It is therefore unlikely that the majority of tRNA precursors form a Watson-Crick base pair between residue -1 and "A248" in mycobacterial RPRs ( and Refs therein). Second, since G at the cleavage site functions as a guiding nucleotide the question is how mycobacterial RNase P handle the processing of those tRNA transcripts with G at -1. The tRNAHis transcript carries G at -1 and is cleaved at -1 instead of +1 generating a functional tRNA with an eight base pair long aa-stem ( and Refs therein). For the other mycobacterial tRNA transcripts carrying G at -1, RNase P might first cleave at -1 and then at the correct site, +1, generating functional tRNAs with seven base pairs long aa-stems. Another possibility, mycobacterial RNase P has an intrinsic capacity to efficiently cleave tRNA transcripts at the correct site +1 despite the presence of G at -1. In this context, we note that the frequency of G-1 for the "HGT tRNA genes" in MmucT, MphoT and MaubT discussed above is low (or absent), while for U-1 it is ≈50% (Additional file 5: Figure S15). This further supports the notion that these tRNA genes have been acquired through horizontal gene transfer.
Stable ncRNAs – RPR, tmRNA, 4.5S RNA, Ms1 RNA ("6S RNA") and 6C RNA
A number of functional ncRNAs have been identified in bacteria and recently several reports document the presence of significant numbers of ncRNAs in MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 using both in silico and experimental approaches (reviewed by [34, 93]). Here we identified several putative ncRNAs in Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. Focusing on the "classical" ncRNAs such as the catalytic RNase P RNA, the scavenging tmRNA and the signal recognition particle 4.5S RNA we showed that their levels in MmucT (and tmRNA in MaubT) are higher in stationary phase compared to exponential phase. This is in keeping with their levels of expression being influenced by growth conditions (see e.g. [94,95,96]). Interestingly, tmRNA is involved in the control of the Caulobacter cell-cycle, sporulation in Bacillus and cell development in Streptomyces species . Given that mycobacteria undergo changes in their cell morphology, including spore formation, upon exposure to environmental changes [97,98,99] it would be interesting to study the impact of tmRNA on cell morphology among mycobacteria.
The 6S RNA is a global transcriptional regulator in bacteria with a role in the adaptation to stationary phase. It binds to the housekeeping σ factor (σA) in the RNA polymerase holoenzyme and thereby preventing the polymerase from binding to DNA promoters that require σA for transcription. The identification of 6S RNA in mycobacteria has been an enigma . We predicted the presence of genes homologous to the Ms1 RNA gene in all Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. In other bacteria the level of 6S RNA increases when the cells enter stationary phase . Our data showed that the level of Ms1 RNA in MmucT cells is significantly higher in stationary phase compared to exponential phase in keeping with what has been reported for MtbH37Rv and MsmegMC2-155 [75, 101]. Moreover, Hnilicová et al.  provided data suggesting that Ms1 RNA binds to the RNA polymerase core enzyme and not to any of the σ factors, including σA. Searching for the presence of the Ms1 RNA gene among the Actinobacteria reveals that homologs are present in several species (Fig. 7a; Additional file 4: Figure S12). The gene synteny for 6S RNA in S. coelicolor [74, 102] and the Ms1 RNA gene in mycobacteria are similar. Together this suggests that Ms1 RNA might be a 6S RNA variant that interacts with RNA polymerase and thereby affect the expression of genes; however, whether it has the same function as 6S RNA in other bacteria remains to be deciphered (see ). In this context, the level of Ms1 RNA accumulates upon infection of mice lungs. Also, overexpression of Ms1 RNA in MtbH37Rv affects the levels of roughly 300 genes [93, 101]. Hence, like 6S RNA, Ms1 RNA appears to be a global regulator with a role in adaptation to stationary phase and growth inside the host cells.
We also identified another known and conserved gene close to the Ms1 RNA gene in the Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members, the 6C RNA gene for which we have little functional information. Its location is conserved relative to the Ms1 RNA gene among different Actinobacteria and the level of 6C RNA is higher in MmucT cells in stationary phase compared to exponentially growing cells, albeit not as pronounced as for Ms1 RNA. The expression of 6C RNA has also been detected in other mycobacteria, Cornynebacterium glutamicum and S. coelicolor [76, 77, 103, 104]. In S. coelicolor, 6C RNA is upregulated during development/sporulation and it has been discussed that it reflects dormancy and slower metabolism . For C. glutamicum, it is suggested to be involved in the SOS response and possibly also in the control of cell division as well as the GlxR, a regulator of carbon source metabolism and energy conversion, regulatory network [77, 105]. The role of mycobacterial 6C RNA is unknown but from the discussion above it is conceivable that it is involved in regulating cell shape and development including dormancy and spore formation in mycobacteria [97, 98], for a review see . Clearly, deciphering the functions of these (and other) ncRNAs will provide information about the way mycobacteria adapts to different growth conditions and perhaps also in relation to cell differentiation.
The genome sizes for Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members range between 5.4 to 6.5 Mbp and phages, IS elements, horizontally transferred tRNA gene clusters, and phage-derived ncRNAs have likely influenced the evolution of the Mmuc- and Mneo-clades. While the number of predicted coding sequences correlates with genome size, the number of tRNA coding genes does not. Among the Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members, 39 tRNA genes are common. Members of the Mmuc-clade harbor several tRNA genes that have been acquired through HGT. The majority of the tRNA genes in mycobacteria are transcribed from single genes. As in other mycobacteria tRNA charging of asparagine and glutamine is accommodated using the tRNA-dependent amidotransferase pathway (Adt) in the Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. The levels of RNase P RNA (essential for the processing of tRNAs), tmRNA, and 4.5S RNA are higher at stationary phase compared to exponentially growing cells. Two new and horizontally transferred ncRNAs are present and expressed in Mmuc-clade members. The levels of the ncRNAs, 6C RNA and Ms1 RNA, are higher in cells at stationary phase compared to exponentially growing cells. The Ms1 RNA likely represents a mycobacterial 6S RNA variant. The evolutionary routes for the ncRNAs RNase P RNA, tmRNA and Ms1 RNA are different from that of the core genes.
Availability of data and materials
All data and materials are available and adheres to BMC Evolutionary Biology policies on sharing data and materials. Genome sequences have been deposited at NCBI, nucleotide sequence accession numbers:
POTL00000000: Mycobacterium mucogenicum DSM 44124
POTM00000000: Mycobacterium phocaicum DSM 45104
POTN00000000: Mycobacterium aubagnense DSM 45150
POTO00000000: Mycobacterium neoaurum DSM 44074
POTP00000000: Mycobacterium cosmeticum DSM 44829
Average Nucleotide Identity
Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen
Horizontal Gene Transfer
The approximately 35 amino acids long peptide carry two conserved histidines and one asparagine (HNH)
- M. sp. URHB0044:
Mycobacterium species URHB0044
- Maub :
- Mbps, kbp and bp:
Million base pairs, thousand base pairs and base pair, respectively
- Mche :
- Mcos :
- Mllat :
Mycobacterium llaterzerense strain CLUC14
- Mmuc :
- Mmuc CSURP2099 :
Mycobacterium mucogenicum strain CSURP2099
- Mmuc LZLC01 :
Mycobacterium mucogenicum strain LZLC01
- Mmuc LZSF01 :
Mycobacterium mucogenicum strain LZSF01
- Mneo :
- Mneo VKMAc-1815D :
Mycobacterium neoaurum strain VKMAc-1815D
- Mpho :
- Msmeg :
M. sp. UNC280 or Mycobacterium species UNC280
M. sp. 360MFT or Mycobacterium species 360MFT
M. sp. UNC410 or Mycobacterium species UNC410
- Mtb :
Database for ncRNA families and structured RNA elements
Ribonuclease P RNA
- rRNA (rDNA):
Ribosomal RNA (DNA)
- T (as superscript):
Vaerewijck MJM, Huys G, Palomino JC, Swings J, Portaels F. Mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems: ecology and significance for human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:911–34.
Primm TP, Lucero CA, Falkinham JO. Health Impacts of Environmental Mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:98–106.
Whitman WB, et al. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2012.
Simões LC, Simões M, Vieira MJ. Biofilm Interactions between Distinct Bacterial Genera Isolated from Drinking Water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6192–200.
Adékambi T, Drancourt M. Dissection of phylogenetic relationships among 19 rapidly growing Mycobacterium species by 16S rRNA, hsp65, sodA, recA and rpoB gene sequencing. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2095–105.
Adékambi T. Mycobacterium mucogenicum group infections: a review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:911–8.
Wallace RJ, Silcox VA, Tsukamura M, Brown BA, Kilburn JO, Butler WR, et al. Clinical significance, biochemical features, and susceptibility patterns of sporadic isolates of the Mycobacterium chelonae-like organism. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:3231–9.
Springer B, Böttger EC, Kirschner P, Wallace RJ. Phylogeny of the Mycobacterium chelonae-like organism based on partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and proposal of Mycobacterium mucogenicum sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:262–7.
Tortoli E. Impact of Genotypic Studies on Mycobacterial Taxonomy: the New Mycobacteria of the 1990s. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:319–54.
Tortoli E. The new mycobacteria: an update. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006;48:159–78.
Adékambi T, Berger P, Raoult D, Drancourt M. rpoB gene sequence-based characterization of emerging non-tuberculous mycobacteria with descriptions of Mycobacterium bolletii sp. nov., Mycobacterium phocaicum sp. nov. and Mycobacterium aubagnense sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:133–43.
Covert TC, Rodgers MR, Reyes AL, Stelma GN. Occurrence of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Environmental Samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:2492–6.
Cooksey RC, Jhung MA, Yakrus MA, Butler WR, Adékambi T, Morlock GP, et al. Multiphasic Approach Reveals Genetic Diversity of Environmental and Patient Isolates of Mycobacterium mucogenicum and Mycobacterium phocaicum Associated with an Outbreak of Bacteremias at a Texas Hospital. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2480–7.
Ben Salah I, Adékambi T, Drancourt M. Mycobacterium phocaicum in therapy pool water. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2009;212:439–44.
Armbruster CR, Forster TS, Donlan RM, O’Connell HA, Shams AM, Williams MM. A biofilm model developed to investigate survival and disinfection of Mycobacterium mucogenicum in potable water. Biofouling. 2012;28:1129–39.
Chen YQ, Chen C, Zhang XJ, Zheng Q, Liu YY. Inactivation of resistant Mycobacteria mucogenicum in water: chlorine resistance and mechanism analysis. Biomed Environ Sci BES. 2012;25:230–7.
Fernandez-Rendon E, Cerna-Cortes JF, Ramirez-Medina MA, Helguera-Repetto AC, Rivera-Gutierrez S, Estrada-Garcia T, et al. Mycobacterium mucogenicum and other non-tuberculous mycobacteria in potable water of a trauma hospital: a potential source for human infection. J Hosp Infect. 2012;80:74–6.
Lorencova A, Klanicova B, Makovcova J, Slana I, Vojkovska H, Babak V, et al. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Freshwater Fish and Fish Products Intended for Human Consumption. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:573–6.
Falkinham JO III. Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107:356–67.
Simkins J, Rosenblatt JD. A case of catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by Mycobacterium phocaicum. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:103–5.
Cooksey RC, de Waard JH, Yakrus MA, Rivera I, Chopite M, Toney SR, Morlock GP, Butler WR. Mycobacterium cosmeticum sp. nov., a novel rapidly growing species isolated from a cosmetic infection and from a nail salon. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2385–91.
Heckman GA, Hawkins C, Morris A, Burrows LL, Bergeron C. Rapidly progressive dementia due to Mycobacterium neoaurum meningoencephalitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:924–7.
Simmon KE, Low YY, Brown-Elliot BA, Wallace RJ Jr, Petti CA. Phylogenetic analysis of Mycobacterium aurum and Mycobacterium neoaurum with redescription of M. aurum culture collection strains. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:1371–5.
Walayat S, Awwal T, Roy M, Ahmad S. Mycobacterium neoaurum line-related bacteremia with pulmonary involvement: Case report and review of literature. IDCases. 2018;11:88–90.
Hacker J, Kaper JB. Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of microbes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:641–79.
Juhas M, van der Meer JR, Gaillard M, Harding RM, Hood DW, Crook DW. Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal genetransfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33:376–93.
Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997;277:1453–74.
Bentley SD. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coeilicolor A3(2). Nature. 2002;417:141–7.
Cole ST. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;393:537–44.
Mohan A, Padiadpu J, Baloni P, Chandra N. Complete genome sequences of a Mycobacterium smegmatis laboratory strain (MC2 155) and isoniazid-resistant (4XR1/R2) mutant strains. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01520–14.
Das S, Pettersson BMF, Behra PRK, Ramesh M, Dasgupta S, Bhattacharya A, et al. Characterization of Three Mycobacterium spp. with Potential Use in Bioremediation by Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genomics. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:1871–86.
Das S, Pettersson BMF, Behra PRK, Ramesh M, Dasgupta S, Bhattacharya A, et al. The Mycobacterium phlei Genome: Expectations and Surprises. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8:975–85.
Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, et al. The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997;390:249–56.
Arnvig KB, Cortes T, Young DB. Noncoding RNA in mycobacteria. Microbiol. Spectr. 2013;2:MGM2–0029.
Kirsebom LA, Trobro S. RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage. IUBMB Life. 2009;61:189–200.
Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2013;10:563–9.
Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:587–9.
Tritt A, Eisen JA, Facciotti MT, Darling AE. An Integrated Pipeline for de Novo Assembly of Microbial Genomes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42304.
Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Stærfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–8.
Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–64.
Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(suppl_1):D121–4.
Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Lindgreen S, et al. Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl_1):D136–40.
Burge SW, Daub J, Eberhardt R, Tate J, Barquist L, Nawrocki EP, et al. Rfam 11.0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D226–32.
Nawrocki EP, Burge SW, Bateman A, Daub J, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, et al. Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D130–7.
Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2933–5.
Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.
Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W29–33.
Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14:1394–403.
Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. PHAST: A Fast Phage Search Tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W347–52.
Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W16–21.
Varani AM, Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Charneau V, Chandler M. ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R30.
Fouts DE, Brinkac L, Beck E, Inman J, Sutton G. PanOCT: automated clustering of orthologs using conserved gene neighborhood for pan-genomic analysis of bacterial strains and closely related species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e172.
Katoh K, Daron M, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: Computing Large Minimum Evolution Trees with Profiles instead of a Distance Matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:1641–50.
Richter M, Rosselló R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–31.
Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2567–72.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (version 3.2.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. 2015. http://www.R-project.org/.
Pettersson BMF, Das S, Behra PRK, Jordan HR, Ramesh M, Mallick A, et al. Comparative Sigma Factor-mRNA Levels in Mycobacterium marinum under Stress Conditions and during Host Infection. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139823.
Pettersson BMF, Kirsebom LA. tRNA accumulation and suppression of the bldA phenotype during development in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79:1602–14.
Fedrizzi T, Meehan CJ, Grottola A, Giacobazzi E, Serpini GF, Tagliazucchi S, Fabio A, Bettua C, Bertolli R, De Sanctis V, Rumplanesi F, Pecorari M, Jousson O, Tortoli E, Segata N. Genomic characterization of nontuberculosis mycobacteria. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45258.
Tortoli E, et al. The new phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: The old and the news. Inf Gene Evol. 2017;56:19–25.
Gupta RS, Lo B, Son J. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies robustly support division of the genus Mycobacterium into an emended genus Mycobacterium and four novel genera. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:article 67.
Gurcha SS, Usha V, Cox JAG, Fütterer K, Abrahams KA, Bhatt A, et al. Biochemical and Structural Characterization of Mycobacterial Aspartyl-tRNA Synthetase AspS, a Promising TB Drug Target. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113568.
Ravishankar S, Ambady A, Swetha RG, Anbarasu A, Ramaiah S, Sambandamurthy VK. Essentiality Assessment of Cysteinyl and Lysyl-tRNA Synthetases of Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147188.
Sheppard K, Söll D. On the Evolution of the tRNA-Dependent Amidotransferases, GatCAB and GatDE. J Mol Biol. 2008;377:831–44.
Sassanfar M, Kranz JE, Gallant P, Schimmel P, Shiba K. A Eubacterial Mycobacterium tuberculosis tRNA Synthetase Is Eukaryote-like and Resistant to a Eubacterial-Specific Antisynthetase Drug. Biochemistry (Mosc). 1996;35:9995–10003.
Belin P, Le Du MH, Fielding A, Lequin O, Jacquet M, Charbonnier J-B, et al. Identification and structural basis of the reaction catalyzed by CYP121, an essential cytochrome P450 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7426–31.
Lahoud G, Hou Y-M. Biosynthesis: A new (old) way of hijacking tRNA. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:795–6.
Vetting MW, Hegde SS, Blanchard JS. The structure and mechanism of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis cyclodityrosine synthetase. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:797.
Fonvielle M, Le Du M-H, Lequin O, Lecoq A, Jacquet M, Thai R, et al. Substrate and Reaction Specificity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cytochrome P450 CYP121. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:17347–59.
Weinberg Z, Perreault J, Meyer MM, Breaker RR. Exceptional structured noncoding RNAs revealed by bacterial metagenome analysis. Nature. 2009;462:656–9.
Herrmann B, Stolt P, Abdeldaim G, Rubin C-J, Kirsebom LA, Thollesson M. Differentiation and Phylogenetic Relationships in Mycobacterium spp with Special Reference to the RNase P RNA Gene rnpB. Curr Microbiol. 2014;69:634–9.
Mikulík K, Bobek J, Zídková J, Felsberg J. 6S RNA modulates growth and antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:7185–97.
Hnilicová J, Jirát Matějčková J, Šiková M, Pospíšil J, Halada P, Pánek J, et al. Ms1, a novel sRNA interacting with the RNA polymerase core in mycobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:11763–76.
Swiercz JP, Hindra BJ, Haiser HJ, Di Berardo C, Tjaden B, et al. Small non-coding RNAs in Streptomyces coelicolor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:7240–51.
Pahlke J, Dostálová H, Holátko J, Degner U, Bott M, Pátek M, et al. The small 6C RNA of Corynebacterium glutamicum is involved in the SOS response. RNA Biol. 2016;13:848–60.
Schaefer KL, McClure WR. Antisense RNA control of gene expression in bacteriophage P22. I. Structures of sar RNA and its target, ant mRNA. RNA. 1997;3:141–56.
Fournier MJ, Ozeki H. Structure and organization of the transfer ribonucleic acid genes of Escherichia coli K-12. Microbiol Rev. 1985;49:379–97.
Vold BS. Structure and organization of genes for transfer ribonucleic acid in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Rev. 1985;49:71–80.
Green CJ, Vold BS. A cluster of nine tRNA genes between ribosomal gene operons in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:3147–51.
Green CJ, Vold BS. Staphylococcus aureus has clustered tRNA genes. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5091–6.
Vold BS, Okamoto K, Murphy BJ, Green CJ. Transcriptional analysis of Bacillus subtilis rRNA-tRNA operons. I. The tRNA gene cluster of rrnB has an internal promoter. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:14480–4.
Vold BS, Green CJ, Narasimhan N, Strem M, Hansen JN. Transcriptional analysis of Bacillus subtilis rRNA-tRNA operons. II. Unique properties of an operon containing a minor 5 S rRNA gene. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:14485–90.
Gao F, Luo H, Zhang C-T. DoriC 5.0: an updated database of oriC regions in both bacterial and archaeal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D90–3.
Zhang YJ, Ioerger TR, Huttenhower C, Long JE, Sassetti CM, Sacchettini JC, et al. Global Assessment of Genomic Regions Required for Growth in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002946.
Gogarten JP, Hilario E. Inteins, introns, and homing endonucleases: recent revelations about the life cycle of parasitic genetic elements. BMC Evol Biol. 2006;6:94.
Edgell DR, Gibb EA, Belfort M. Mobile DNA elements in T4 and related phages. Virol J. 2010;7:290.
Brok-Volchanskaya VS, Kadyrov FA, Sivogrivov DE, Kolosov PM, Sokolov AS, Shlyapnikov MG, et al. Phage T4 SegB protein is a homing endonuclease required for the preferred inheritance of T4 tRNA gene region occurring in co-infection with a related phage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:2094–105.
Suzuki T, Miyauchi K. Discovery and characterization of tRNAIle lysidine synthetase (TilS). FEBS Lett. 2010;584:272–7.
Choo SW, Wee WY, Ngeow YF, Mitchell W, Tan JL, Wong GJ, et al. Genomic reconnaissance of clinical isolates of emerging human pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus reveals high evolutionary potential. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4061.
Behra PRK, Das S, Pettersson BMF, Shirreff L, DuCote T, Jacobsson K-G, Ennis DG, Kirsebom LA. 2019. Extended insight into the Mycobacterium chelonae-abscessus complex through whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium salmoniphilum outbreak and Mycobacterium salmoniphilum-like strains. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4603.
Haning K, Cho SH, Contreras LM. Small RNAs in mycobacteria: an unfolding story. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:96.
Dong H, Nilsson L, Kurland CG. Co-variation of tRNA Abundance and Codon Usage inEscherichia coliat Different Growth Rates. J Mol Biol. 1996;260:649–63.
Andini N, Nash KA. Expression of tmRNAin Mycobacteria is Increased by Antimicrobial Agents that Target the Ribosome. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;322:172–9.
Barends S, Barend K, van Wezel GP. The tmRNA-tagging mechanism and the control of gene expression: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2011;2:233–46.
Ghosh J, Larsson P, Singh B, Pettersson BMF, Islam NM, Sarkar SN, et al. Sporulation in mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:10781–6.
Lamont EA, Bannantine JP, Armién A, Ariyakumar DS, Sreevatsan S. Identification and Characterization of a Spore-Like Morphotype in Chronically Starved Mycobacterium avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis Cultures. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30648.
Kirsebom LA, Dasgupta S, Fredrik Pettersson BM. Pleiomorphism in Mycobacterium. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2012;80:81–112.
Wehner S, Damm K, Hartmann RK, Marz M. Dissemination of 6S RNA among Bacteria. RNA Biol. 2014;11:1467–78.
Arnvig KB, Comas I, Thomson NR, Houghton J, Boshoff HI, Croucher NJ, et al. Sequence-Based Analysis Uncovers an Abundance of Non-Coding RNA in the Total Transcriptome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002342.
Pánek J, Bobek J, Mikulík K, Basler M, Vohradský J. Biocomputational prediction of small non-coding RNAs in Streptomyces. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:217.
Arnvig KB, Young DB. Identification of small RNAs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2009;73:397–408.
Mentz A, Neshat A, Pfeifer-Sancar K, Pühler A, Rückert C, Kalinowski J. Comprehensive discovery and characterization of small RNAs in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:714.
Jungwirth B, Sala C, Kohl TA, Uplekar S, Baumbach J, Cole ST, et al. High-resolution detection of DNA binding sites of the global transcriptional regulator GlxR in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbiol Read Engl. 2013;159:12–22.
Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, Potter SC, Punta M, Qureshi M, Sangrador-Vegas A, Salazar GA, Tate J, Bateman A. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D279–85.
Letunic I, Bork P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D493–6.
Our colleagues are acknowledged for discussions. Sequencing was performed by the SNP&SEQ Technology Platform in Uppsala, which is part of the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI) Sweden and Science for Life Laboratory. The SNP&SEQ Platform is supported by the Swedish Research Council and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.
No permission was required to obtain the strains used in this study.
This work was funded by the Swedish Research Council (M and N/T), the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning (FORMAS), and the Uppsala RNA Research Center (Swedish Research Council Linneus support) to LAK. Neither of the funding bodies were involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing of the manuscript. Funding for open access charge: Swedish Research Council (N/T).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
All authors give their consent to publish this work.
The authors declare no competing interests. LAK holds shares in Bioimics AB. This does not alter our adherence to policies on sharing data and materials.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Introduction. Table and Figure legends. Table S1. Compilation of oligonucleotide probes used in the present study. Table S2. Summary of genome assembly. Table S3. Phage analysis of Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. Table S4a. Annotation of IS elements in MmucT. Table S4b. Annotation of IS elements in Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. Figure S1. Genome alignments. (ZIP 1120 kb)
Introduction. Figure legends. Figure S2a, b. Functional classification of genes. Figure S3a, b. Phylogenetic analysis. (ZIP 151 kb)
Introduction. Table and Figure legends. Table S5. Compilation of predicted tRNA genes in the "32 tRNA gene cluster". Table S6a. Compilation of predicted aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) paralogs. Table S6b. Compilation of predicted genes encoding GatCAB enzymes. Table S6c. Compilation of regular and extra gene copy aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes. Supplementary text information. Prediction of genes encoding aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase paralogs and cyclodipeptide synthetase genes in Mmuc- and Mneo-clade members. Figure S4a-e. Analysis of tRNA genes . Figure S5. tRNA sequence alignment for all tRNA genes. Figure S6a-f. Analysis of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase and selected AARS genes. Figure S7a, b. Cyclodipeptide synthase (CDPS) – PF16715 [106, 107]. (ZIP 166 kb)
Introduction. Table and Figure legends. Table S7. Rfam non-coding RNA annotations. Figure S8a, b. ncRNA genes. Figure S9a-i. RNase P RNA (rnpB), tmRNA and 4.5S RNA. Figure S10. Northern blot analysis of selected tRNAs and ncRNAs with size markers. Figure S11a, b. Analysis of GOLLD RNA. Figure S12a-d. Comparison of Ms1 RNA and 6C RNA genes in mycobacteria. Figure S13a, b. Comparison of a intron Group II gene cluster. (ZIP 7530 kb)
About this article
- Mycobacterial genomes
- Comparative mycobacterial genomics
- Non-coding RNA in mycobacteria
- tRNA genes
- Expression of tRNA and non-coding RNA