Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Rubisco L-subunit sites candidate to positive selection

From: Exploring molecular evolution of Rubisco in C3 and CAM Orchidaceae and Bromeliaceae

DatasetNaSite modelsM2a vs. M1a testSite modelM8 vs. M8a test
M0M2aM8
ωbp2cω2dSelected sitesep-valuefp1ωSelected sitesp-value
Orchids780.120.890.0289***, 251***, 449**, 461*, 478*, 479**, 481**10.001999.089***, 142*, 225**, 251***, 265*, 449***, 461**, 468**, 470*, 477*, 478*, 479**, 481**1
Bromeliads1300.170.910.0128***, 91***, 142***, 225**, 251*, 449**, 468***, 478***10.001999.028***, 91***, 142***, 225***, 251**, 255*, 270*, 449***, 468***, 478***1
  1. aNumber of species
  2. bdN/dS ratio averaged across all branches and codons
  3. cProportion of codons in a class under positive selection
  4. ddN/dS ratio in a class under positive selection
  5. eSites marked with *, ** and *** are under positive selection with posterior probability higher than 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99, respectively
  6. fp-value refers to likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) calculated between nested models of codon evolution M1a-M2a and M8-M8a